Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Russian Formalism
- STRUCTURALISM: ITS RISE, INFLUENCE AND AFTERMATH
- READER-ORIENTED THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION
- 9 Hermeneutics
- 10 Phenomenology
- 11 Reception theory: School of Constance
- 12 Speech act theory and literary studies
- 13 Other reader-oriented theories
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
13 - Other reader-oriented theories
from READER-ORIENTED THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Russian Formalism
- STRUCTURALISM: ITS RISE, INFLUENCE AND AFTERMATH
- READER-ORIENTED THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION
- 9 Hermeneutics
- 10 Phenomenology
- 11 Reception theory: School of Constance
- 12 Speech act theory and literary studies
- 13 Other reader-oriented theories
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
It is by now commonplace to point out that unlike such tightly organized schools as structuralism or Marxism, reader-oriented criticism, taking its major forms up until around 1990, is neither united by a common methodology nor directed toward a common goal. As Susan Suleiman notes, it ‘is not one field but many, not a single widely trodden path but a multiplicity of crisscrossing, often divergent tracks’ (‘Varieties of audience-oriented criticism’, p. 6).
Jane Tompkins, it is true, argues, in the introduction to her influential anthology, that there has been a ‘coherent progression’ from formalism to the belief that ‘reading and writing … [are] two names for the same activity’ (‘Introduction’, p. ix). But while this description accurately charts the trajectory of Stanley Fish, reader-oriented criticism as a whole exhibits little historical progression and offers little sense of ultimate arrival. Indeed, there does not even seem to be a common point of origin for the divergent tracks. Even Steven Mailloux's general claim that reader-response critics ‘all share the phenomenological assumption that it is impossible to separate perceiver from perceived, subject from object’ would seem to exclude such important figures as Wayne Booth (Interpretive Conventions, p. 20).
Reader-oriented critics seem at one in their opposition to certain traditional formalist practices – especially, in the United States, to the decontextualization demanded by New Criticism. This hostility to New Criticism, however, is common to most other contemporary theorists as well. Moreover, even if there seems to be a single subject of inquiry ('the reader'), the term, as we shall see, takes on so many different meanings in current discourse that it serves less as a unifying banner than as a trophy to be wrested from the opposition.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 375 - 403Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
References
, Readings and Feelings: An Introduction to Subjective Criticism (Providence,IL, 1975).Google Scholar
(ed.), ‘In defense of authors and readers: a discussion by Wayne Booth, Wolfgang Iser, et al.’, Novel, 11 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On the value of Hamlet’, in (ed.), Reinterpretations of Elizabethan Drama: Selected Papers from the English Institute (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
, ‘Psychology and form’ (1924), in Counter-Statement (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1968).Google Scholar
, ‘Do readers make meaning?’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Some doubts about the reader of Paradise Lost’, College English, 37 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘The Fisher King: Wille zur Macht in Baltimore,’ Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ideal reader: a critical fiction’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 93 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Reading about reading: “A Jury of Her Peers”, “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”, and “The Yellow Wallpaper'”, in and (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
, *‘Pragmatism and literary theory I: consequences’, Critical Inquiry, 11 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘Profession despise thyself: fear and self-loathing in literary studies’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘Working on the chain gang: interpretation in the law and in literary criticism’, Critical Inquiry, 9 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘No bias, no merit: the case against blind submission’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 103 (1988).Google Scholar
, Doing What Come Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham, NC, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
, Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers’, College English 11 (1950); rpt. in (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Culture and anarchy’, review of Is There a Text in this Class? by , New Republic, 184 (14 February, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘Narrative and the unofficial interpretive culture’, in (ed.), Reading Narrative: Form, Ethics, Ideology (Columbus, OH, 1989).Google Scholar
‘Recovering “The Purloined Letter”: reading as a personal transaction’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
‘The miller's wife and the professors: questions about the transactive theory of reading’, New Literary History, 17 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Unity Identity Text Self’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poems in Persons: An Introduction to the Psychoanalysis of Literature (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Ourself behind ourself: a theory for lesbian readers’, in and (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
and , ‘Against theory’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982); rpt. in (ed.), Against Theory (Chicago, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A map for rereading: or, gender and the interpretation of literary texts,’ New Literary History, 11 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Dancing through the minefield: some observations on the theory, practice, and politics of a feminist literary criticism,’ Feminist Studies, 6 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Reading the Yvain/Charrette: Chretien's inscribed audiences at Noauz and Pesme Aventure’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 19, no. 2 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
, Dostoevsky and The Idiot: Author, Narrator, and Reader (Providence, MA, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer and the Traditions of Literary Utopia (Austin, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘Teleology and taxonomy in critical explanation’, Bucknell Review, 26, no. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
, ‘The writer's audience is always a fiction,’ Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Audience Oriented Criticism and the Classics, Special Issue of Arethusa, 19, no. 2 (1986).Google Scholar
, Reading People, Reading Plots: Character, Progression, and the Interpretation of Narrative (Chicago, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘Interpretive strategies/strategic interpretations: on Anglo-American reader response criticism,’ Boundary 2, 11 (1981/1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Introduction à l'étude du narrataire,’ Poetique no. 14 (1973); rpt. as ‘Introduction to the Study of the Narratee’, trans. , in (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Notes on the text as reader’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
, review of Is There a Text in This Class? by , Journal of Aesthetic Education, 17 (1983).
, ‘Truth in fiction: a reexamination of audiences’, Critical Inquiry, 4 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘"What's Hecuba to Us?: the audience's experience of literary borrowing,’ in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
‘Circumstantial evidence: musical analysis and theories of reading’, Mosaic, 18, no. 4 (1985).Google Scholar
Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘Review of An Introduction to Literary Semiotics by Maria Cort and The Role of the Reader by Umberto Eco’, Clio, 10 (1980).Google Scholar
The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work (Providence, IL, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Reading ourselves: toward a feminist theory of reading,’ in and (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
, review of Subjective Criticism by , Criticism, 21 (1979).
, review of Fish et al, Modern Fiction Studies, 27 (1981).
, ‘Reading Robbe-Grillet: sadism and text in Projet pour une revolution à New York’, Romanic Review, 68 (1977).Google Scholar
and , eds., The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘An introduction to reader-response criticism’, in (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. ix–xxvi.Google Scholar
Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790–1860 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
(ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980).Google Scholar
, Gendered Interventions: Narrative Discourse in the Victorian Novel (New Brunswick, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘The debt of criticism: notes on Stanley Fish's Is There a Text in This Class?’, in Institution and Interpretation [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 31] (Minneapolis, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The professor knows’, Review of Is There a Text in This Class? by , New York Review of Books, 28 (17 December 1981).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by