Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- READING AND INTERPRETATION: AN EMERGING DISCOURSE OF POETICS
- POETICS
- I Humanist classifications
- II The rediscovery and transmission of materials
- 9 Literary imitation in the sixteenth century: writers and readers, Latin and French
- 10 Petrarchan poetics
- 11 Translatio and translation in the Renaissance: from Italy to France
- 12 Invention
- III Rhetorical poetics
- IV Literary forms
- THEORIES OF PROSE FICTION
- CONTEXTS OF CRITICISM: METROPOLITAN CULTURE AND SOCIO-LITERARY ENVIRONMENTS
- VOICES OF DISSENT
- STRUCTURES OF THOUGHT
- NEOCLASSICAL ISSUES: BEAUTY, JUDGEMENT, PERSUASION, POLEMICS
- A SURVEY OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
9 - Literary imitation in the sixteenth century: writers and readers, Latin and French
from II - The rediscovery and transmission of materials
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- READING AND INTERPRETATION: AN EMERGING DISCOURSE OF POETICS
- POETICS
- I Humanist classifications
- II The rediscovery and transmission of materials
- 9 Literary imitation in the sixteenth century: writers and readers, Latin and French
- 10 Petrarchan poetics
- 11 Translatio and translation in the Renaissance: from Italy to France
- 12 Invention
- III Rhetorical poetics
- IV Literary forms
- THEORIES OF PROSE FICTION
- CONTEXTS OF CRITICISM: METROPOLITAN CULTURE AND SOCIO-LITERARY ENVIRONMENTS
- VOICES OF DISSENT
- STRUCTURES OF THOUGHT
- NEOCLASSICAL ISSUES: BEAUTY, JUDGEMENT, PERSUASION, POLEMICS
- A SURVEY OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Renaissance concepts of the relationship between artistically composed language and the true nature of things are usually bound almost inextricably with the presupposition that the genesis of literary composition lies in rhetoric and in the imitation of model authors. As Scaliger puts it (Poetices libri septem, v.x): ‘We have a method of expressing the nature of things, for we imitate what our predecessors have said in exactly the same way as they imitated nature’. Even so, not all sixteenth-century concepts of literature entail literary imitation. It is, for example, virtually absent from writing which primarily invites an allegorical rather than a rhetorical reading. Allegorical interpretation may draw on other authors as repositories of information, but it is an essentially non-rhetorical mode in that it fundamentally depends on the reader's freedom to substitute one sign for another or one signified for another according to associative formulae which have nothing to do with concepts of style found in classical rhetoric. In rhetorically constituted discourse, meaning is derived from the choice and arrangement of words. In the sixteenth century the influence of classical rhetoric was paramount, and the lessons of humanist rhetoric were largely lessons in how to write like admired exemplars of literary expression in the ancient languages. The history of literary criticism in our period is therefore to a large extent a history of which models were recommended for imitation, of instructions as to how they were to be imitated, and of the side-effects of such prescriptions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 107 - 118Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999
References
Laura tra Petrarca e Bembo: studi sul commento umanistico-rinascimentale al ‘Canzoniere’, Padua: Antenore, 1992.Google Scholar
‘Der Streit des Alonso von Cartagena mit Leonardo Bruni Aretino’, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, 20 (1922).Google Scholar
The classical heritage and its beneficiaries from the Carolingian Age to the end of the Renaissance; 1954; reprint New York: Harper & Row, 1964.Google Scholar
(ed.), Traduction et adaptation en France à la fin du Moyen Age et à la Renaissance: actes du colloque organisé par l'Université de Nancy II, 23–25 mars 1995, Paris: H. Champion, 1997.Google Scholar
De interpretatione recta, in Leonardo Bruni Aretino Humanistisch-Philosophische Schriften, ed. ; reprint Wiesbaden: M. Sandig, 1969.Google Scholar
, and (ed.), Dichtungslehren der Romania aus der Zeit der Renaissance und des Barock, Frankfurt: Athenäum, 1972.Google Scholar
Pléiade poetics: a study in sixteenth-century thought and terminology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
The cornucopian text: problems of writing in the French Renaissance, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Traducteurs d'autrefois. Moyen Age et Renaissance. Dictionnaire des traducteurs et de la littérature traduite en ancien et moyen français (842–1600), Paris and Geneva: Champion-Slatkine, 1988, 2 vols.Google Scholar
The Gallo-Roman muse: aspects of Roman literary tradition in sixteenth-century France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
The first English translators of the classics, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Dialogus De imitatione Ciceroniana adversus Desiderium Erasmum Roterodamum, pro Christophoro Longolio; 1535; facs. reprint Geneva: Droz, 1974.Google Scholar
La manière de bien traduire d'une langue en autre; 1540; reprint Paris: J. Tastu for Téchener, 1830.Google Scholar
Dialogus Ciceronianus, ed. , in , Opera omnia, vol. 1, 2, Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1971.Google Scholar
and , Catalogue of the Petrarch collection in the Cornell University Library, 2nd edn, Millwood, NJ: Kraus-Thomson, 1974.Google Scholar
Le umane parole: imitazione nella lirica europea del Rinascimento, da Bembo a Ben Jonson, Milan: Mondadori, 1997.Google Scholar
, Il Petrarcha colla spositione di misser Giovanni Andrea Gesualdo, Venice: Fratelli da Sabbio, 1533.Google Scholar
The light in Troy: imitation and discovery in Renaissance poetry, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Sujet de l'écriture et traduction autour de 1540, Paris: Atelier National Reproduction des Thèses, 1988.Google Scholar
Interpretatio linguarum: seu de ratione convertendi et explicandi autores tam sacros quam prophanos, Basle: H. Frobenius and N. Episcopius, 1559.Google Scholar
and (ed.), Translation in the Renaissance, special issue, Canadian review of comparative literature, 8, 2, Spring 1981.Google Scholar
Translation from the classics into English from Caxton to Chapman (1477–1620), Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1933.Google Scholar
De interpretatione recta, in Apologeticus (Adversus suae novae Psalterii traductionis obtrectatores apologetici libri V), Vatican Library Pal. lat. 41.
Translation: an Elizabethan art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhétorique et poétique au XVIe siècle en France. Du Bellay, Ramus et les autres, Leiden: Brill, 1986.Google Scholar
Ovid in Renaissance France: a survey of the Latin editions of Ovid and commentaries printed in France before 1600, London: The Warburg Institute, 1982.Google Scholar
Poetry and fable: studies in mythological narrative in sixteenth-century France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
The ideology and language of translation in Renaissance France and their humanist antecedents, Geneva: Droz, 1984.Google Scholar
De elocutionis imitatione ac apparatu … Io. Francisci Pici Mirandulae ad Petrum Bembum et Petri Bembi ad Io. Franciscum Picum Mirandulam de imitatione epistolae duae, Paris: G. Julianus, 1555. First edition of Omphalius, De elocutionis imitatione, Paris: S. de Colines, 1537.Google Scholar
Three centuries of French poetic theory: a critical history of the chief arts of poetry in France (1328–1630), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1935, 2 vols.Google Scholar
‘Le teorie umanistiche del tradurre e l' “Apologeticus” di Giannozzo Manetti’, Bibliothèque d'humanisme et Renaissance 37 (1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Neo-Latin imitation of the Latin classics’, in Latin Poetry and the classical tradition, ed. and , Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
, , , , and (ed.), Creative imitation: new essays on Renaissance literature in honor of Thomas M. Greene, Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance texts and studies, 1992.Google Scholar
‘Interpretatio’: language and translation from Cicero to Tytler, Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1989.Google Scholar
, prefaces to La Franciade, in Œuvres complètes, ed. , , and , rev. edn, vol. XVI, Paris: Nizet, 1983.Google Scholar
Erasmus as a translator of the classics, Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Poetices libri septem; 1561; facs. reprint and Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1987, ed. Google Scholar
‘The theory of translation in 16th-century Germany’, Modern language review 40 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Translation into German in the 15th century’, Modern language review 39 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, An apology for poetry, ed. , Manchester: Manchester University Press; New York: Barnes and Noble, 1973.Google Scholar
, Miscellaneous prose of Sir Philip Sidney, ed. and , Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traités de poétique et de rhétorique de la Renaissance, ed. , Paris: Librairie générale française, 1990.Google Scholar
Le volgari opere del Petrarcha con la espositione di Alessandro Vellutello da Lucca, Venice: Fratelli da Sabbio, 1525.Google Scholar
A history of literary criticism in the Italian Renaissance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Arte of rhetorique (1553), ed. , The Renaissance imagination 1, New York: Garland, 1982.Google Scholar
Fifteenth-century translation as an influence on English prose, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by