Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T05:06:40.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Grammatica and literary theory

from I - THE LIBERAL ARTS AND THE ARTS OF LATIN TEXTUALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Martin Irvine  and
David Thomson
Edited by
Alastair Minnis  and
Ian Johnson
Alastair Minnis
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Ian Johnson
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

No single medieval discipline embraced all that we call literary criticism or theory today, but the discipline closest to literary criticism – in the sense of the interpretation of a traditional literary canon and the description of literary language – was grammatica. The scope and cultural effects of grammatica are large topics, embracing literacy, linguistic theory, traditions of commentary and exegesis, and the development of a literary canon, but here we must limit the field to those aspects of grammatica that had a direct bearing on the practice of literary criticism and interpretation.

Grammatica was traditionally defined as having two main methodological divisions and subject-areas: ‘the science of interpreting the poets and other writers and the systematic principles [ratio] for speaking and writing correctly’, that is, the methods for reading, interpreting and evaluating literary works, especially the canon of classical poets, and the rules or principles for speaking and writing according to normative Latin conventions. The literary division of the discipline, scientia interpretandi, was understood to have four main parts or methodological divisions – lectio, the principles for reading a text aloud from a manuscript, including the rules of prosody; enarratio, exposition of content and the principles for interpretation, including the analysis of figurative language; emendatio, the rules for establishing textual authenticity and linguistic correctness, and iudicium, criticism or evaluation of writings. In the linguistic division, the object of analysis was the language of classical literary texts, the auctores, not ordinary speech. From its beginnings, then, grammatica was a science of the text, embracing a systematic description of the authoritative textual language (Greek or Latin) and the methods for reading and interpreting an established literary canon.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 13 - 41
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbo, Fleury (Abbo Floriacensis), Quaestiones grammaticales, Apologeticus, Epistulae, PL 139.
Abbo, Fleury (Abbo Floriacensis), Quaestiones grammaticales, ed. Guerreau-Jalabert, A. (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter, Glosses on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias, ed. Geyer, B., Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften, 1.2, Die Glossen zu Peri Hermeneias, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelaltes, Texte und Untersuchungen, 21, 3 (Münster i.W., 1927); tr. in Arens, H., Aristotle's Theory of Language and its Tradition: Texts from 500–1750 (Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter, Dialectica: First Complete Edition of the Parisian Manuscript, ed. Rijk, L. M. (2nd edn, Assen, 1956).Google Scholar
Ad habendam materiam, ed. Gieben, Sint AnthonisServus, O.F.M.Cap., ‘Preaching in the Thirteenth Century: A Note on Ms. Gonville and Caius 439’, Collectanea franciscana, 32 (1962).Google Scholar
Adalbert, Samaria, Praecepta dictaminum, ed. Schmale, F.-J., Monumenta germaniae historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 3 (Weimar, 1961).Google Scholar
Aimeric, , Ars lectoria, ed. Reijnders, H. F., Vivarium, 9 (1971) ; 10 (1972).Google Scholar
Alan, Lille, De planctu naturae, ed. Häring, N. M., Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 19 (1978) ; tr. Sheridan, J. J. (Toronto, 1980).Google Scholar
Alan, Lille, Anticlaudianus, ed. Bossuat, R. (Paris, 1955); tr. Sheridan, J. J. (Toronto, 1973).Google Scholar
Alan, Lille, Liber parabolarum (seu Parvum doctrinale), PL 210.
Alberic, Monte Cassino, Flores rhetorici, ed. Inguanez, D.M. and Willard, H. M., Miscellanea cassinese, 14 (Montecassino, 1938); tr. Miller in Miller, Prosser, J. N. and Benson, (eds.), Readings in Medieval Rhetoric.Google Scholar
Alberic, Monte Cassino, Restauri Albericiani, ed. Alessio, G. C., Medioevo romanzo, 2 (1975).Google Scholar
Alberic, Monte Cassino, De rithmis, ed. Davis, H. H., Mediaeval Studies, 28 (1966).Google Scholar
Alcok, Simon, De modo dividendi themata, ed. Boynton, M. F., ‘Simon Alcok on Expanding the Sermon’, Harvard Theological Review, 34 (1941).Google Scholar
Alcuin, (?) and Charlemagne, , ‘De litteris colendis’, Monumenta germaniae historica, Leges, Sect. II, Capitularia Regum Francorum, no. 29, p. ; also ed. Wallach, L., in Alcuin and Charlemagne: Studies in Carolingian History and Literature (Ithaca NY, 1959).Google Scholar
Alcuin, , De rhetorica, ed. Howell, W. S., The Rhetoric of Alcuin and Charlemagne (1941; rpt. New York, 1965); also ed. Halm, G., Rhetores latini minores, and PL 101.Google Scholar
Alcuin, , De dialectica, Patrologia cursus completus, series latina, ed. Migne, J.-P. (217 vols. and 4vols. of tables, Paris, 1841–64) 101.Google Scholar
Alcuin, , De grammatica, Patrologia cursus completus, series latina, ed. Migne, J.-P. (217 vols. and 4vols. of tables, Paris, 1841–64) 101.Google Scholar
Alcuin, , Disputatio Pippini regalis et nobilissimi iuvenis cum Albino scholastico, Patrologia cursus completus, series latina, ed. Migne, J.-P. (217 vols. and 4vols. of tables, Paris, 1841–64) 101.Google Scholar
Alcuin, , Orthographia, ed. Keil, H., Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig, 1857–80), 7 ; also ed. Marsili, A. (Pisa, 1952).Google Scholar
Aldhelm, , Opera, ed. Ehwald, R., MGH, AA 15 (3 vols. ; rpt. Berlin, 1961).Google Scholar
Aldhelm, , The Prose Works, tr. Lapidge, M. and Herren, M. (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
Alessio, , Gian Carlo, , ‘Brunetto Latini e Cicerone (e i dettatori)’, Italia medioevale e umanistica, 22 (1979).Google Scholar
Alexander, Nequam, Corrogationes Promethei. Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 550, fols. Ir–Ioor; MS Bodley 760, fols. 99r–I7IV; Auct. F.5.23, fols. 7r–86r.
Alexander, Villa Dei, Doctrinale, ed. Reichling, D., Monumenta germaniae paedagogica, 12 (Berlin, 1893).Google Scholar
Alexander, Villa Dei, Ecclesiale, ed. Lind, L. R. (Lawrence KS, 1958).Google Scholar
Alfonso, d'Alprao, Ars praedicandi, ed. Hauf, A. G., ‘El Ars Praedicandi de Fr. Alfonso d'Alprao, O.F.M.: Aportación al estudio de la teoría de la predicación en la Península Ibérica’, AFH, 72 (1979).Google Scholar
Alford, John A., ‘The Grammatical Metaphor: A Survey of its Use in the Middle Ages’, Speculum, 57 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John A., ‘The Role of the Quotations in Piers Plowman’, Speculum, 52 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ælfric, , Aelfrics Grammatik und Glossar, ed. Zupitza, J., 2nd edn intro. Gneuss, H. (Berlin, 1966).Google Scholar
Allen, Judson B., The Ethical Poetic of the Later Middle Ages: A Decorum of Convenient Distinction (Toronto, 1980).Google Scholar
Allen, Judson B., The Ethical Poetic of the Later Middle Ages: A Decorum of Convenient Distinction (Toronto, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Judson B., The Friar as Critic (Nashville TN, 1971).Google Scholar
Anderson, J. J.Patience, (Manchester, 1969).Google Scholar
Anderson, J. J., ‘The Prologue of Patience’, Modern Philology, 63 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglade, J.Las Leys d'Amors (4 vols., Toulouse, 1919–20).Google Scholar
Anhorn, Judy Schaaf, ‘Sermo Poematis: Homiletic Tradition of Purity and Piers Plowman’, Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1976.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Bologna, Rationes dictandi, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher ; tr. Murphy in Murphy, J. J. (ed.), Three Medieval Rhetorical Arts.
Anselm, , De grammatico, ed. Henry, D. P. (Notre Dame IN, 1964).Google Scholar
Antonio, Tempo, Summa artis rithmici vulgaris dictaminis, ed. Andrews, R., Collezione di opere inedite o rare, 136 (Bologna, 1977).Google Scholar
Arbusow, Leonid, Colores rhetorici: Eine Auswahl rhetorischer Figuren und Gemeinplätze als Hilfsmittel für akademische übungen an mittelalterlichen Texten (Göttingen, 1948).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De arte poetica, tr. William, Moerbeke, ed. Valgimigli, E., Aristoteles Latinus, 33 (Bruges, 1953).Google Scholar
Arnaud, Mareuil, Les Saluts d'amour, ed. Bec, P. (Toulouse, 1961).Google Scholar
Ars dictandi aurelianesis, in Rockinger, (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Arsegino, , Quadriga and Proverbi, ed. Marangon, P., Quaderni per la storia dell'Università di Padova (1976–7).Google Scholar
Arts libéraux et philosophie au Moyen Âge: Actes du quatrième congrès international de philosophie médiévale (Montreal, 1969).
Astell, Ann, ‘Cassiodorus' Commentary on the Psalms as an Ars rhetorica’, Rhetorica, 17 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, , Contra academicos; De beata vita; De ordine; De magistro; De libero arbitrio, ed. Green, W. M. and Daur, K.-D., Corpus Christianorum, series latina 29 (Turnhout, 1970).Google Scholar
Augustine, , De dialectica, ed. Pinborg, J. and tr. Jackson, B. D. (Dordrecht and Boston MA, 1975).Google Scholar
Augustine, , De doctrina christiana, ed. Martin, J., Corpus Christianorum, series latina 32 (Turnhout, 1962); tr. Robertson, D. W. Jr. (New York, 1958).Google Scholar
Auvray, Lucien, ‘Documents orléanais du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle: Extraits du formulaire de Bernard de Meung’, Mémoires de la société archéologique et historique de l'Orléanais, 23 (1892).Google Scholar
Averroes, , Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle's ‘Topics’, ‘Rhetoric’, and ‘Poetics’, ed. and tr. Butterworth, C. E. (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger, Summa gramatica Magistri Rogeri Bacon necnon Sumule dialectices, ed. , R. Steele, in Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, 15 (Oxford, 1940).Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger, Bachonis grammatica graeca: The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar, ed. Nolan, E. and Hirsch, S. A. (Cambridge, 1902).Google Scholar
Baerwald, Herman, Das Baumgartenberger Formelbuch: Eine Quelle zur Geschichte des XIII. Jahrhunderts vornehmlich der Zeiten Rudolfs von Habsburg, Fontes rerum austriacarum, Abt. 2, 25 (Vienna, 1866).Google Scholar
Bagliani, Agostino Paravicini, ‘Eine Briefsammlung für Rektoren des Kirchenstaates (1250–1320)’, Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 35 (1979).Google Scholar
Bagni, Paolo, La costituzione della poesia nelle artes del XII–XIII secolo, Università degli Studi di Bologna facolta di lettere e filosofia: Studi e ricerche, n.s. 20 (Bologna, 1968).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Viktring, Ars dictaminis, ed. Schaller, D., Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 35 (1979).Google Scholar
Baldwin, John W., Masters, Princes, and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter and his Circle (2 vols., Princeton NJ, 1970).Google Scholar
Baldwin, , Liber dictaminum, ed. Dursza, S., Quadrivium, 13 (1972).Google Scholar
Bataillon, Louis Jacques, ‘De la lectio à la predicatio: Commentaires bibliques et sermons au XIIIe siècle’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 70 (1986).Google Scholar
Bede, , Libri II de arte metrica et de schematibus et tropis: The Art of Poetry and Rhetoric, ed. and tr. Kendall, C. B. (Saarbrücken, 1991).Google Scholar
Bene, Florence, Candelabrum, ed. Alessio, G. C. (Padua, 1983).Google Scholar
Benson, Robert L., et al. (eds.), Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge MA, 1982).Google Scholar
Bériou, Nicole, ‘La Prédication au béguinage de Paris pendant l'année liturgique 1272–1273’, Recherches augustiniennes, 13 (1978).Google Scholar
Bernard, Silvester, (?) Commentum super sex libros Eneidos Virgilii, ed. , J. W. and Jones, E. F. (Lincoln NE and London, 1977); tr. Schreiber, E. G. and Maresca, T. E., Commentary on the First Six Books of Vergil's ‘Aeneid’ (Lincoln NE and London, 1979).Google Scholar
Bernard, Silvester, (?) Dictamen, ed. Brini Savorelli, M., Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 20 (1965).Google Scholar
Bernard, Pseudo-, Cartula (De contemptu mundi), Patrologia cursus completus, series latina, ed. Migne, J.-P. (217 vols. and 4vols. of tables, Paris, 1841–64) 184.Google Scholar
Bernold, Kaisersheim (Kaisheim), Summula dictaminis, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Beyer, Heinz-Jurgen, ‘Die Frühphase der ars dictandi’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 18 (1977).Google Scholar
Bichilino da, Spello, Pomerium rethorice, ed. Licitra, V., Quaderni del Centro per il collegamento degli studi medievali e umanistici nell'Università di Perugia, 5 (Florence, 1979).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W., ‘Patience and the Mashal’, in Bessinger, J. B. Jr. and Raymo, R. R. (eds.), Medieval Studies in Honor of L. H. Hornstein (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Boethius, Dacia, Modi significandi sive quaestiones super Priscianum maiorem, ed. Pinborg, J. and Roos, H., Corpus philosophorum danicorum medii ævi, 4 (Copenhagen, 1969).Google Scholar
Boethius, , Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ‘Perihermeneias’, ed. Meiser, G. (Leipzig, 1887); tr. in Arens, H., Aristotle's Theory of Language and its Tradition: Texts from 500–1750 (Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
Bonaventure, Brother, ‘The Teaching of Latin in Later Medieval England’, Mediaeval Studies, 23 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonaventure, , St, Sermones dominicales, ed. Bougerol, J. G., Bibliotheca franciscana scholastica medii ævi, 27 (Grottaferrata, 1977).Google Scholar
Boncompagno da, Signa, Cedrus, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher, pp. 121–7.
Boncompagno da, Signa, Palma, in Carl, S. (ed.), Aus Leben und Schriften des Magisters Boncompagno (Freiburg-im-Breisgau and Leipzig, 1894).Google Scholar
Boncompagno da, Signa, Rhetorica novissima, ed. Gaudenzi, A., Scripta anecdota antiquissimorum glossatorum, Bibliotheca iuridica medii ævi, ed. Palmerio, G. (Bologna, 1892), II.Google Scholar
Boncompagno da, Signa, Rota Veneris: A Facsimile Reproduction of the Strassburg Incunabulum with Introduction, Translation, and Notes, ed. Purkart, J. (Delmar NY, 1975).Google Scholar
Bondi, John, of Aquilegia, Practica sive usus dictaminis, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Bono da, Lucca, Cedrus libanus, ed. Vecchi, G., Istituto di filologia romanza dell'Università di Roma, Testi e manuali, 46 (Modena, 1963).Google Scholar
Brearley, Denis G., ‘A Bibliography of Recent Publications Concerning the History of Grammar During the Carolingian Renaissance’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 21 (1980).Google Scholar
Bremond, C., LeGoff, J., and Schmitt, J.-C., L'Exemplum, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, 40 (Turnhout, 1982).Google Scholar
Bresslau, Harry, Handbuch der Urkundenlehre für Deutschland und Italien (4th edn, 2 vols., Berlin, 1968–9).Google Scholar
Briggis, John, Compilacio de arte dictandi, in , Camargo (ed.), Rhetorics of Prose Composition, pp. 88–104.
Brinton, Thomas, Sermones, ed. Devlin, M. A., The Sermons of Thomas Brinton, Bishop of Rochester (1373–1389), Camden Third Series (2 vols., London, 1954).Google Scholar
Briscoe, Marianne G., ‘Preaching and Medieval English Drama’, in Briscoe, M. G. and Coldewey, J. C. (eds.), Contexts for Early English Drama (Bloomington IN, 1989).Google Scholar
Briscoe, Marianne G., Artes praedicandi, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, 61 (Turnhout, 1992).Google Scholar
Brown, C.Les Douze dames de rhétorique, ed. and tr. Allegorica, 16 (1995).Google Scholar
Brown, C., ‘Du nouveau sur la “mystere” des Douze Dames de Rhetorique: Le role de Georges Chastellain’, Bulletin de la Commission Royale d'Histoire, 153 (1987).Google Scholar
Brown, Carleton (ed.), The Pardoner's Tale (Oxford, 1935).Google Scholar
Bultot, Robert, ‘Grammatica, Ethica et Contemptus mundi aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles’, in Arts libéraux.
Burke, James F., ‘The Libro del cavallero Zifar and the Medieval Sermon’, Viator, 1 (1970).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L., ‘Johannes de Garlandia – Forgotten Grammarian and the Manuscript Tradition’, Hist. Ling., 3 (1976).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L., ‘Medieval Donatus Commentaries’, in Hist. Ling., 8 (1981).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L., ‘Teaching Grammars of the Middle Ages: Notes on the Manuscript Tradition’, Hist. Ling., 4 (1977).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L., ‘The Middle Ages’, Current Trends in Linguistics, 13 (1975).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L., ‘Towards a History of Linguistics in the Middle Ages, 1100–1450’, in Hymes, D. (ed.), Studies in the History of Linguistics (Bloomington IN, 1972).Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L., Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages (The Hague, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, Regina sedens rhetorica, in (ed.), Rhetorics of Prose Composition.
Camargo, Martin, ‘Toward a Comprehensive Art of Written Discourse: Geoffrey of Vinsauf and the Ars dictaminis’, Rhetorica, 6 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, Martin, ‘Tria sunt: The Long and the Short of Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi’, Speculum, 74 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, Martin, Ars dictaminis, ars dictandi, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, 60 (Turnhout, 1991).Google Scholar
Camargo, Martin, The Middle English Verse Love Epistle, Studien zur englischen Philologie, n.F. 28 (Tübingen, 1991).Google Scholar
Camargo, Martin (ed.), Medieval Rhetorics of Prose Composition: Five English ‘Artes Dictandi’ and Their Tradition, Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 115 (Binghamton NY, 1995).Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry, ‘A Late-Mediaeval Tractate on Preaching’, in Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James A. Winans (New York, 1925).Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry, ‘Classical Rhetoric and the Mediaeval Theory of Preaching’, Classical Philology, 28 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Harry, ‘Rhetorical Invention in Some Mediaeval Tractates on Preaching’, Speculum, 2 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Harry, ‘The Four Senses of Scriptural Interpretation and the Mediaeval Theory of preaching’, Speculum, 4 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Harry, Mediaeval ‘artes praedicandi’: A Hand-List, Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, 24 (Ithaca NY, 1934).Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry, Mediaeval ‘artes praedicandi’: A Supplementary Hand-List, Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, 25 (Ithaca NY, 1936).Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry, Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Mediaeval Rhetoric, ed. King, A. and North, H. (Ithaca NY, 1970). [A collection of the essays listed here as published 1927–33].Google Scholar
Capua, Francesco di, Fonti ed esempi per lo studio dello ‘stilus curiae romanae’ medioevale, Testi medievali, 3 (Rome, 1941).Google Scholar
Capua, Francesco di, Scritti minori (2 vols., Rome, 1959).Google Scholar
Cartellieri, Alexander, Ein Donaueschinger Briefsteller: Lateinische Stilübungen des XII. Jahrhunderts aus der Orléans'schen Schule (Innsbruck, 1898).Google Scholar
Cassiodorus, , Expositio psalmorum, ed. Adriaen, M., Corpus Christianorum, series latina (2 vols., Turnhout, 1958).Google Scholar
Cassiodorus, , Institutiones, ed. Mynors, R. A. B. (Oxford, 1937); tr. Jones, L. W., An Introduction to Divine and Human Readings by Cassiodorus Senator (New York, 1946).Google Scholar
Chance, Jane, ‘Allegory and Structure in Pearl: The Four Senses of the ars praedicandi and Fourteenth-Century Homiletic Poetry’, in Blanch, R. J., Miller, M. Y. and Wasserman, J. N. (eds.), Text and Matter: New Critical Perspectives of the Pearl-Poet (Troy NY, 1991).Google Scholar
Chapman, C. O., ‘Chaucer on Preachers and Preaching’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 44 (1928).Google Scholar
Chapman, C. O., ‘The Pardoner's Tale: A Medieval Sermon’, Modern Language Notes, 41 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. O., ‘The Parson's Tale: A Medieval Sermon’, Modern Language Notes, 42 (1927).Google Scholar
Chapman, Janet A., ‘Juan Ruiz's “Learned Sermon”’, in Gybbon-Monypenny, (ed.), ‘Libro de buen amor’ Studies.
Charland, T.-M. (ed.), Artes praedicandi: contribution à l'histoire de la rhétorique au Moyen Âge (Paris, 1936).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey, The Riverside Chaucer, gen. ed. Benson, L. D. (Boston MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Chenu, M.-D., ‘Auctor, actor, autor’, Archivum latinitatis medii ævi (Bulletin du Cange), 3 (1927).Google Scholar
Chenu, M.-D., ‘Grammaire et théologie au XIIe et XIII siècles’, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge, 10–11 (1935–6) ; rpt. in Chenu, Théologie au douzieme siècle.Google Scholar
Chenu, M.-D., La Théologie au douzieme siècle (Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
Christine de, Pizan, The Epistle of Othea, translated from the French Text of Christine de Pisan by Stephen Scrope, ed. Bühler, G. L., Early English Text Society, Original Series 264 (London, 1937).Google Scholar
Clark, Albert C., Fontes prosae numerosae (Oxford, 1909).Google Scholar
Clark, Albert C., Prose Rhythm in English (Oxford, 1913).Google Scholar
Clark, Albert C., The Cursus in Mediaeval and Vulgar Latin (Oxford, 1910).Google Scholar
Clark, Donald L., John Milton at St Paul's School (New York, 1948).Google Scholar
Clogan, Paul M., ‘Literary Genres in a Medieval Textbook’, Medievalia et humanistica, n.s. 11 (1982).Google Scholar
Cola di, Rienzo, Briefwechsel des Cola di Rienzo, ed. Burdach, K. and Piur, P., Vom Mittelalter zur Reformation: Forschungen zur Geschichte der deutschen Bildung, 2.4 (Berlin, 1912).Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L., The Mirror of Knowledge: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge (rev. edn, Lincoln NA, 1983).Google Scholar
Compendium rhetoricae venustatis, ed. Dursza, S.Filológiai közlöny, 20 (1974).Google Scholar
Constable, Giles, Letters and Letter-Collections, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, 17 (Turnhout, 1976).Google Scholar
Coulter, Cornelia G., ‘Boccaccio's Knowledge of Quintilian’, Speculum, 33 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington, M. A., Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure (Cambridge, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Alverny, Marie-Thérèse, ‘La Sagesse et ses sept filles: Recherches sur les allégories de la philosophie et des arts libéraux du IXe au XIIe siècle’, in Mélanges dédiées à la mémoire de Félix Grat (2 vols., Paris, 1946–9), 1.Google Scholar
Dalzell, A.Transmundus, Introductiones dictandi, ed. (Toronto, 1995).Google Scholar
Dalzell, Ann, ‘The Forma dictandi attributed to Alberto of Morra and Related Texts’, Mediaeval Studies, 39 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dati, Agostino, Senensis clarissimi oratoris atque philosophi de elegantia et de conficiendis epistolis (Paris, 1508).Google Scholar
Davy, M. M., Les Sermons universitaires parisiens de 1230–1231: Contribution à l'histoire de la prédication médiévale, Eacute;tudes de philosophie médiévale, 15 (Paris, 1931).Google Scholar
Rijk, L. M., Logica modernorum: A Contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic (2 vols., Assen, 1962–7).Google Scholar
Delcorno, Carlo, ‘Origini della predicazione francescana’, in Francesco d'Assisi e Francescanesimo dal 1216 al 1226: Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale, Assisi 1976 (Assisi, 1977).Google Scholar
Delcorno, Carlo, ‘Rassegna di studi sulla predicazione medievale e umanistica (1970–1980)’, Lettere italiane, 33 (1981).Google Scholar
Delhaye, Philippe, ‘“Grammatica” et “Ethica” au XIIe siècle’, Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 25 (1958).Google Scholar
Delhaye, Philippe, ‘L'Organisation scolaire au XIIe siècle’, Traditio, 5 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delisle, Léopold, ‘Des Recueils épistolaires de Bérard de Naples’, Notices et extraits, 27 (1879).Google Scholar
Delisle, Léopold, ‘Le Formulaire de Tréguier et les écoliers bretons des écoles d'Orléans au commencement du XIVe siècle’, Mémoires de la société archéologique et historique de I'Orléans, 23 (1892).Google Scholar
Delisle, Léopold, ‘Notice sur une Summa dictaminis jadis conservée à Beauvais’, Notices et extraits, 36 (1899).Google Scholar
Denholm-Young, Noel, ‘The Cursus in England’, in Denholm-Young, Collected Papers (Cardiff, 1969).Google Scholar
Deschamps, Eustache, L'Art de dictier, in Œuvres complètes, VII, ed. Saint-Hilaire, Marquis Queux and Raynaud, C., Société des anciens textes français (Paris, 1891).Google Scholar
Deyermond, Alan D., ‘Some Aspects of Parody in the Libro de buen amor’, in Gybbon-Monypenny, (ed.), ‘Libro de buen amor’ Studies.
Deyermond, Alan D., ‘The Sermon and its Use in Medieval Castilian Literature’, La Corónica, 8 (1980).Google Scholar
Diomedes, , Ars grammatica, ed. Keil, H.Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig, 1857–80), 4.
Dominicus Dominici, Viseu, Summa dictaminis secundum quod notarii episcoporum et archyepiscoporum debeant officium exercere, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Donatus, Aelius, Ars grammatica (Ars minor, Ars maior), ed. Holtz, L., Donat et la tradition de l'enseignement grammatical (Paris, 1981); also ed. Keil, H., Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig, 1857–80), 4.Google Scholar
Dörrie, Heinrich, Der heroische Brief: Bestandsaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung (Berlin, 1968).Google Scholar
Dursza, S. (ed.), ‘L'ars dictaminis di un maestro italiano del secolo XII’, Acta literaria academiae scientiarum Hungaricae [Budapest], 12 (1970).Google Scholar
Dybinus, Nicolaus, Declaratorio oracionis de beata Dorothea, ed. Jaffe, S. P., Beiträge zur Literatur des XV. bis XVIII. Jahrhunderts, 5 (Wiesbaden, 1974).Google Scholar
Engels, J.Kneepkens, C. H. and Reijnders, H. F.Siguinus, Magister, Ars lectoria, ed. (Leiden, 1979).Google Scholar
Erdmann, Carl, ‘Leonitas: Zur mittelalterlichen Lehre von Kursus, Rhythmus und Reim’, in Corona quernea: Festgabe Karl Strecker zum 80. Geburtstage dargebracht, Schriften des Reichsinstituts für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde, MGH, 6 (1941; rpt. Stuttgart, 1952).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R., ‘St. Anselm's Technical Terms of Grammar’, Latomus, 38 (1979).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R., ‘The Place of Peter the Chanter's De tropis loquendi’, Analecta cisterciensia, 39 (1983).Google Scholar
Evans, G. R., Alan of Lille: The Frontiers of Theology in the Later Twelfth Century (Cambridge, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Évrard, Béthune, Graecismus, ed. Wrobel, J., Corpus grammaticorum medii ævi, 1 (Breslau, 1887).Google Scholar
Faral, Eberhard the German (Everardus Alemannus), in (ed.), Les Arts poétiques.
Faral, Edmond (ed.), Les Arts poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle, Bibliothèque de l'École des hautes études, 238 (1923; rpt. Geneva, 1982).Google Scholar
Faulhaber, Charles B., ‘Las retóricas clásicas y medievales en bibliotecas castellanas’, Abaco, 4 (1973).Google Scholar
Faulhaber, Charles B., ‘Las retóricas hispanolatinas medievales siglos XII–XIII’, in Repertorio de historia de las ciencias eclesiásticas en España, 7 (1979).Google Scholar
Fisher, John H., ‘Chancery Standard and Modern Written English’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 6 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, John V., ‘Hoccleve's “Letter of Cupid” and the “Quarrel” over the Roman de la Rose’, Medium Ævum, 40 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Alan J., ‘The Preaching of the Pardoner’, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 11 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forti, Fiorenzo, ‘La transumptio nei dettatori bolognesi e in Dante’, in Dante e Bologna nei tempi di Dante (Bologna, 1967).Google Scholar
Francigena, Henry, ‘Die Briefmuster des Henricus Francigena’, ed. Odebrecht, B., Archiv für Urkundenforschung, 14 (1936).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘Petrus Helias on Rhetoric’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 13 (1974).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘Some Notes on the Grammar of William of Conches’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 37 (1981).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘The Commentaries on Cicero's De inventione and Rhetorica ad Herennium by William of Champeaux’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 17 (1976).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘The Commentaries on Thierry of Chartres on Cicero's De inventione’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 7 (1971).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘The Dependence of Petrus Helias' Summa Super Priscianum on William of Conches' Glose super Priscianum’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 11 (1973).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘Tractaus Glosarum Prisciani in MS Vat. Lat. 1486’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 21 (1977).Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., ‘Universal Grammar according to some Twelfth-Century Grammarians’, in KoernerNiederehe, K. H.-J. and , R. H. Robins (eds.), Studies in Medieval Linguistic Thought Dedicated to G. L. Bursill-Hall (Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
Friis-Jensen, Karsten, ‘The Ars poetriae in Twelfth-Century France: The Horace of Matthew of Vendôme, Geoffrey of Vinsauf, and John of Garland’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 60 (1990).Google Scholar
Fulgentius, , Opera, ed. Helm, R. (Leipzig, 1898); tr. Whitbread, L. G.Fulgentius the Mythographer (Columbus OH, 1971).Google Scholar
Gallick, Susan, ‘Artes Praedicandi: Early Printed Editions’, Mediaeval Studies, 39 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallick, Susan, ‘A Look at Chaucer and his Preachers’, Speculum, 50 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallick, Susan, ‘The Continuity of the Rhetorical Tradition: Manuscript to incunabulum’, Manuscripta, 23 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudenzi, Augusto, ‘Sulla cronologia delle opere dei dettatori Bolognesi da Buoncompagno a Bene di Lucca’, Bullettino dell'Istituto storico italiano, 14 (1895).Google Scholar
Gehl, Paul F., ‘From Monastic Rhetoric to Ars dictaminis: Traditionalism and Innovation in the Schools of Twelfth-Century Italy’, The American Benedictine Review, 34 (1983).Google Scholar
Gehl, Paul F., A Moral Art: Grammar, Society and Culture in Trecento Florence (Ithaca NY, 1993).Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Vinsauf, Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi, ed. , Faral, Les Arts poétiques ; tr. Parr, R. P. (Milwaukee WI, 1968).Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Vinsauf, Poetria nova, ed. , Faral, Les Arts poétiques ; tr. Nims, M. F. (Toronto, 1967); also Kopp, J. B. in Murphy, (ed.), Three Medieval Rhetorical Arts ; ed. and tr. Gallo, E., The ‘Poetria Nova’ and its Sources in Early Rhetorical Doctrine (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Vinsauf, Summa de arte dictandi, ed. Licitra, V., Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 7 (1966).Google Scholar
Geraldus, Piscario (or Girardus), Ars faciendi sermones, ed. Delorme, F. M., ‘L'Ars faciendi sermones de Géraud du Pescher’, Antonianum, 19 (1944).Google Scholar
Ghellinck, Joseph, L'Essor de la littérature latine au XIIe siècle (2 vols., Brussels and Paris, 1946).Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret, ‘The Collected Works of Priscian: The Printed Editions, 1470–1859’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 18 (1977).Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret, ‘The Early Scholastic Glosule to Priscian, Institutiones grammaticae: The Text and its Influence’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 20 (1979).Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne, ‘Michel Menot et la technique du sermon médiéval’, in Les idées et les lettres (Paris, 1932).Google Scholar
Giovanni, del Virgilio, Ars dictaminis, ed. Kristeller, P. O., Italia medioevale e umanistica, 4 (1961).Google Scholar
Glauche, Günter, Schullektüre im Mittelalter: Entstehung und Wandlungen des Lektürekanons bis 1200 nach den Quellen dargestellt, Münchener Beiträge zur Mediävistik und Renaissance-Forschung, 5 (Munich, 1970).Google Scholar
Grabmann, M., ‘Die Kommentar des seligen Jordanus von Sachsen zum Priscianus minor’, in Mittelalterliches Geistesleben III (Munich, 1959).Google Scholar
Grabmann, M., Die Geschichte der scholastischen Methode (2 vols., Basel, 1961).Google Scholar
Grisdale, D. M.Three Middle English Sermons from the Worcester Chapter Manuscript F. 10, ed. (Leeds, 1939).Google Scholar
Grondeux, Anne, Le ‘Graecismus’ d'Évrard de Béthune à travers ses gloses: entre grammaire positive et grammaire spéculative du XIIIe au XVe siècle, Studia artistarum: Études sur la Faculté des arts dans les universités médiévales, 8 (Turnhout, 2000).Google Scholar
Guido, Faba, ‘Un trattato inedito di Guido Fava’, ed. Chirico, L., Biblion: Rivista di bibliofilia e di erudizione varia, 1 (1946–7).Google Scholar
Guido, Faba, Dictamina rhetorica, ed. Gaudenzi, A., Propugnatore, n.s. 25 (1892), 1:, 2.Google Scholar
Guido, Faba, Doctrina ad inveniendas incipiendas et formandas materias et ad ea que circa huiusmodi requiruntur, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Guido, Faba, Epistole, ed. Gaudenzi, A., Propugnatore, n.s. 26 (1893), 1:, 2.Google Scholar
Guido, Faba, Summa de vitiis et virtutibus, ed. Pini, V., Quadrivium, 1 (1956).Google Scholar
Guido, Faba, Summa dictaminis, ed. Gaudenzi, A., Propugnatore, n.s. 3, 1 (1890) ; 2 (1890).Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus, De divisione philosophiae, ed. Baur, L., Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Texte und Untersuchungen, 4 (Munich, 1903).Google Scholar
Gybbon-Monypenny, G. B. (ed.), ‘Libro de buen amor’ Studies (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Harbert, B.A Thirteenth-Century Anthology of Rhetorical Poems: Glasgow Mediaeval Studies Hunterian V.8.14, ed. (Toronto, 1975).Google Scholar
Haskins, Charles H., ‘Early Bolognese Formulary’, in Mélanges d'historie offerts à Henri Pirenne (Brussels, 1926).Google Scholar
Haskins, Charles H., ‘Italian Master Bernard’, in Davis, H. W. C. (ed.), Essays in History Presented to Reginald Lane Poole (Oxford, 1927).Google Scholar
Haskins, Charles H., ‘The Life of Medieval Students as Illustrated by Their Letters’, in Haskins, Studies in Mediaeval Culture.
Haskins, Charles H., Studies in Mediaeval Culture (Oxford, 1929).Google Scholar
Hendley, Brian P., ‘John of Salisbury's Defense of the Trivium’, in Arts libéraux.
Henri, d'Andeli, La Bataille des VII ars, ed. and tr. Paetow, L. J., in Two Medieval Satires on the University of Paris: ‘La Bataille des VII ars’ of Henri d'Andeli and the ‘Morale scolarium’ of John of Garland (Berkeley CA, 1914).Google Scholar
Herman, Gerald, ‘Henri d'Andeli's Epic Parody: La bataille des sept ars’, Annuale medievale, 18 (1977).Google Scholar
Higden, Ralph, Ars componendi sermones, ed. Jennings, M., The ‘Ars componendi sermones’ of Ranulph Higden, O.S.B. (Leiden, 1991).Google Scholar
Hilary, Christine Ryan, Notes on the Pardoner's Tale, in The Riverside Chaucer, gen. ed. Benson, L. D. (Boston MA, 1987).Google Scholar
Hilke, Alfons, ‘Die anglonormannische Kompilation didaktisch-epischen Inhalts der Hs. Bibl. nat. nouv. acq. fr. 7517’, Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur, 47 (1925).Google Scholar
Hill, Ordelle G., ‘The Audience of Patience’, Modern Philology, 66 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz, Louis, ‘Irish Grammarians and the Continent in the Seventh Century’, in Columbanus and Merovingian Monasticism, ed. Clarke, H. B. and Brennan, M. (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis, Donat et la tradition de l'enseignement grammatical: Étude sur l'Ars Donati et sa diffusion, IVe–IXe siècles, et édition critique (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Holtzmann, Walther, ‘Eine oberitalienische Ars dictandi und die Briefsammlung des Priors Peter von St. Jean in Sens’, Neues Archiv, 46 (1926).Google Scholar
Honorius, Autun, De animae exsilio et patria, alias de artibus, PL 172.
Honorius, Autun, De imagine mundi, PL 172.
Honorius, Autun, Philosophia mundi, PL172, 39–102.
Hugh, Bologna, Rationes dictandi prosaice, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Hugh, Victor, De grammatica and Epitome Dindimi in philosophiam, ed. Baron, R., Hugonis de Sancto Victore opera propaedeutica (Notre Dame IN, 1966).Google Scholar
Hugh, Victor, Didascalicon, ed. Buttimer, G. H. (Washington DC, 1939); tr. Taylor, J. (New York, 1961).Google Scholar
Humbert, Romans, De eruditione praedicatorum, ed. Berthier, J. J., B. Humberti de Romanis, De vita regulari (Rome, 1888–9), II ; tr. Tugwell, S., Treatise on the Formation of Preachers, in , Tugwell (ed.), Early Dominicans: Selected Writings (Ramsey NJ and London, 1982).Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., ‘Oxford Grammar Masters in the Middle Ages’, in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus, Oxford Historical Society, n.s. 16 (Oxford, 1964) ; rpt. in Hunt, History of Grammar.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., ‘Studies on Priscian in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries, I: Petrus Helias and his Predecessors’, Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 1 (1941–3) ; rpt. in Hunt, History of Grammar.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., ‘Studies on Priscian in the Twelfth Century, II: The School of Ralph of Beauvais’, Medieval and Renaissance Studies 2 (1950) ; rpt. in Hunt, History of Grammar.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., ‘The Introductions to the Artes in the Twelfth Century’, Studia mediaevalia in honorem admodum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin (Bruges, 1948) ; rpt. in Hunt, History of Grammar.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages: Collected Papers, ed. Bursill-Hall, G. L. (Amsterdam, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. W., The Schools and the Cloister: The Life and Writings of Alexander Nequam (1157–1217), ed. and rev. Gibson, M. (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
Hunt, Tony, Teaching and Learning Latin in Thirteenth-Century England (3 vols., Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Huntsman, Jeffrey F., ‘Grammar’, in Wagner, D. L. (ed.), The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages (Bloomington IN, 1983).Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin, ‘A Guide to the Sources of the Medieval Theories of Interpretation, Signs, and the Arts of Discourse: Aristotle to Ockham’, Semiotica, 63 (1987).Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin, ‘Bede the Grammarian and the Scope of Grammatical Studies in Eighth-Century Northumbria’, Anglo-Saxon England, 15 (1986).Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin, ‘Interpretation and the Semiotics of Allegory in the Works of Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Augustine’, Semiotica, 63 (1987).Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin, ‘Medieval Grammatical Theory and Chaucer's House of Fame’, Speculum, 60 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Martin, The Making of Textual Culture: ‘Grammatica’ and Literary Theory, 350–1100 (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin, The Making of Textual Culture: ‘Grammatica’ and Literary Theory (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
Isidore, Seville, Etymologiae sive origines, ed. Lindsay, W. M. (2 vols., Oxford, 1911).Google Scholar
Isidore, Seville, Etymologiae, ed. Lindsay, W. M. (2 vols., Oxford, 1911).Google Scholar
Isidore, Seville, Opera, PL.
Jacques, Dinant, Summa dictaminis, ed. Polak, E., Études de philologie et d'historie, 28 (Geneva, 1975).Google Scholar
Janson, Tore, Prose Rhythm in Medieval Latin from the Ninth to the Thirteenth Century, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Studia Latina Stockholmiensia, 20 (Stockholm, 1975).Google Scholar
Jeauneau, Édouard, ‘Deux Rédactions des gloses de Guillaume de Conches sur Priscian’, Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 27 (1960) ; rpt. in Lectio philosophorum.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, Édouard, Lectio philosophorum: Recherches sur l'École de Chartres (Amsterdam, 1973).Google Scholar
Jennings, Margaret, ‘Rhetor redivivus? Cicero in the artes praedicandi’, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge, 61 (1989).Google Scholar
John Balbus, Genoa, Catholicon (1460; rpt. Westmead, Hants., 1971).Google Scholar
John, Bologna, Summa notarie, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
John, Dacia, Summa grammatica, in Johannis Daci opera, ed. Otto, A., Corpus philosophorum danicorum medii ævi, 1 (Copenhagen, 1955).Google Scholar
John, Garland, Clavis compendii and Compendium grammatice. Cambridge, Gonville and Gaius College, MSS 385/605, 593/453, 136/76; Bruges, Biblioth`eque publique, MS 546.
John, Garland, Compendium gramatice, ed. Haye, T. (Cologne, 1995).Google Scholar
John, Garland, Dictionarius, pr. in facs. and tr. Rubin, B. B. (Lawrence KA, 1981).Google Scholar
John, Garland, Multo[rum] vocabulo[rum] equiuoco[rum] interpretatio (London, [1514]).Google Scholar
John, Garland, Parisiana poetria, ed. and tr. Lawler, T. (New Haven CT and London, 1974).Google Scholar
John, Garland, Synonyma (London, [1502]).Google Scholar
John, Limoges, Libellus de dictamine et dictatorio syllogismorum, ed. Horváth, C., Johannis lemovicensis opera omnia (3 vols., Veszprém, 1932), I.Google Scholar
John, Salisbury, Metalogicon, ed. Webb, G. G. J. (Oxford, 1929); tr. McGarry, D. D. (Berkeley CA, 1955).Google Scholar
John, Rochelle, Processus negociandi themata sermonum, ed. Cantini, G., ‘Processus negociandi themata sermonum di Giovanni della Rochella O.F.M.’, Antonianum, 26 (1951).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean, ‘Comparaison des théories du langage chez Abélard et chez les nominalistes du XIVe siècle’, in Buytaert, E. M. (ed.), Peter Abelard: Proceedings of the International Conference, Medievalia Lovaniensia, Ist ser. pt. 2 (Leuven, 1974).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean, ‘L'Enjeu de la grammaire pour Godescalc’, in Jean Scot Érigène et l'histoire de la philosophie, Actes du colloques internationaux, 561 (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean, Arts du langage et théologie chez Abélard, Études de philosophie médiévale, 57 (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Juan Gil de, Zamora, Dictaminis epithalamium, ed. Faulhaber, C., Biblioteca degli studi mediolatini e volgari, n. s. 2 (Pisa, 1978).Google Scholar
Julian, Toledo, Ars grammatica, ed. Maestra Yenes, M. A. H. (Toledo, 1973).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H.‘Petrus de Vinea in England’, Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Instituts für Geschichtsforschung, 51 (1937).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H., ‘Anonymi Aurea Gemma’, Medievalia et humanistica, 1 (1943).Google Scholar
Keil, H.Sergius, In Artem Donati, ed. Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig), 4.
Keil, H.Servius, In Artem Donati, ed. Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig), 4.
Keil, H. In Vergilii carmina commentarii, ed. Thilo, G. and Hagen, H. (2 vols., Leipzig, 1923).Google Scholar
Kelly, Douglas, ‘The Scope of the Treatment of Composition in the Twelfth- and Thirteenth Century Arts of Poetry’, Speculum, 41 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Douglas, The Arts of Poetry and Prose, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, 59 (Turnhout, 1991).Google Scholar
Kemmler, Fritz, ‘Exempla’ in Context: A Historical and Critical Study of Robert Mannyng of Brunne's ‘Handling Synne’ (Tübingen, 1984).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A., Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times (Chapel Hill NC, 1980).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A., New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism (Chapel Hill NC, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilwardby, Robert, De ortu scientiarum, ed. Judy, A. G. (Oxford, 1976).Google Scholar
Kilwardby, Robert, Tractatus super Priscianum maiorem. Selections ed. by Fredborg, K. M. et al., ‘The Commentary on Priscianus Maior ascribed to Robert Kilwardby’, Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin, 15 (Copenhagen, 1975).Google Scholar
Kindrick, Robert L., ‘Henryson and the ars praedicandi’, in Kindrick, Henryson and the Medieval Arts of Rhetoric (New York, 1993).Google Scholar
Kittendorf, Doris E., ‘Cleanness and the Fourteenth–Century artes praedicandi’, Michigan Academician, II (1979).Google Scholar
Klopsch, Paul, Einführung in die Dichtungslehren des lateinischen Mittelalters (Darmstadt, 1980).Google Scholar
Koch, J. (ed.), Artes liberales: Von der antiken Bildung zur Wissenschaft des Mittelalters, Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 5 (Leiden, 1959).Google Scholar
Konrad, Mure, Summa de arte prosandi, in Rockinger, (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Kretzman, Norman, ‘The Culmination of the Old Logic in Peter Abelard’, in Benson (ed.), Renaissance and Renewal.
Kretzman, Norman Kenny Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, Pinborg, Jan, and Stump, Eleanor (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O., ‘Matteo de Libri, Bolognese Notary of the Thirteenth Century and his Artes dictaminis’, in Miscellanea Giovanni Galbiati, Fontes ambrosiani, 26 (Milan, 1951), II.Google Scholar
Kühnel, J.Dû bist mîn, ih bin dîn: Die lateinischen Liebes-(und Freundschafts-) Briefe des clm 19411: Abbildungen, Text und Übersetzung, ed. Litterae: Göppinger Beiträge zur Textgeschichte, 52 (Göppingen, 1977).Google Scholar
Ladner, Gerhart, ‘Formularbehelfe in der Kanzlei Kaiser Friedrichs II. und die Briefe des Petrus de Vinea’, Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Institut für Geschichtsforschung, Ergänzungsband, 12.1 (1932).Google Scholar
Laistner, M. L. W., Thought and Letters in Western Europe, A. D. 500 to 900 (2nd edn, Ithaca NY, 1957).Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo, Formulario di epistole volgare, missive, e responsive e altri fiori di ornati parliamenti (Milan, 1500).Google Scholar
Langkabel, Hermann, Die Staatsbriefe Coluccio Salutatis (Vienna, 1981).Google Scholar
Langlois, Charles V., ‘Formulaires de letters du XIIe du XIIIe, et du XIV siécles’, Notices et extraits, 34.1 (1891) ; 34.2 (1895) ; 35.2 (1897).Google Scholar
Latini, Brunetto, Li Livers dou Tresor, ed. Chabaille, P. (4 vols., Bologna, 1878).Google Scholar
Latini, Brunetto, Li Livres dou tresor, ed. Carmody, F. J., University of California Publications in Modern Philology, 22 (Berkeley CA, 1948).Google Scholar
Laurence, Aquilegia, Practica dictaminis, ed. Capdevila, S., Analecta sacra tarraconensia, 6 (1930).Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich, Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (2 vols., 1960; 2nd edn, Munich, 1973); tr. Bliss, M. T., Jansen, A. and Orton, D. E., ed. Orton, D. E. and Dean, R., as A Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study (Leiden, 1998).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien, ‘Anglo–Saxon England: Ælfric's Excerptiones de arte grammatica anglice’, Histoire epistémologie langage, 9 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Vivien, ‘Late Latin Grammars in the Early Middle Ages: A Typological History’, Historiographia linguistica, 13 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Vivien, ‘Linguistics in the Early Middle Ages: The Insular and Carolingian Grammarians’, Transactions of the Philological Society (1985).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien, ‘Originality in the Medieval Normative Tradition’, in Bynon, T. and Palmer, F. R. (eds.), Studies in the History of Western Linguistics in Honor of R. H. Robins (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien, The Insular Latin Grammarians (Woodbridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Lawton, David A., ‘Gaytryge's Sermon, Dictamen, and Middle English Alliterative Verse’, Modern Philology, 76 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Saulnier de Saint–Jouan, Henri–Georges, ‘Pons le Provençal maître en “Dictamen” (XIIIe siécle)’, diss., École nationale des chartes (2 vols., Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
Le Stile et manière de composer, dicter, et escrire toute sorte d'epistres, ou lettres missives, tant par réponse que autrement, avec epitome de la poinctuation françoise (Lyon, 1555?).
Leach, Arthur F. (ed. and tr.), Educational Charters and Documents (Cambridge, 1911).Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean, ‘Le Genre épistolaire au Moyen Âge’, Revue du moyen Âge latin, 2 (1946).Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean, ‘Smaragde et la grammaire chrétienne’, Revue du moyen âge latin, 4 (1948).Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God, tr. Misrahi, K. (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
Lecoy, Félix, Recherches sur le ‘Libro de buen amor’ de Juan Ruiz, Archiprêtre de Hita (Paris, 1938).Google Scholar
Lehmann, Paul, Erforschung des Mittelalters (4 vols., Leipzig).
Lehmann, Paul, Mittelalterliche Bibliothekskataloge Deutschlands und der Schweiz (Munich, 1918–).Google Scholar
Lerner, R. E., ‘A Collection of Sermons Given in Paris c. 1267, including a New Text by Saint Bonaventura on the Life of Saint Francis’, Speculum, 49 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letson, D. R., ‘The Form of the Old English Homily’, ABR, 30 (1979).Google Scholar
Licitra, Vincenzo, ‘La Summa de arte dictandi di Maestro Goffredor’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 7 (1966).Google Scholar
Lindholm, Gudrun, Studien zum mittellateinischen Prosarythmus: Seine Entwicklung und sein Abklingen in der Briefliteratur Italiens, Studia latina stock-holmiensia, 10 (Stockholm and Uppsala, 1963).Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus, Conscribendis latine epistolis (Magdeburg, 1594).Google Scholar
Löfstedt, B.Sedulius Scottus, In Donati Artem Maiorem, ed. Corpus Christianorum, continuatio medievalis (Turnhout, 1977).Google Scholar
Löfstedt, Bengt, and Lanham, Carol D., ‘Zu den neugefundenen Salzburger Formelbüchern und Briefen’, Eranos, 73 (1975).Google Scholar
Longère, Jean, Œuvres oratoires de maîtres parisiens au XIIe sièpcle: Étude historique et doctrinale (2 vols., Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
Longère, Jean, La Prédication médiévale (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
Loserth, J., ‘Formularbücher der Grazer Universitätsbibliothek’, Neues Archiv, 21 (1895–6) ; 22 (1896–7) ; 23 (1897–8).Google Scholar
Ludolf, Hildesheim, Summa dictaminum, in Rockinger, (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Luscombe, D. E., The School of Peter Abelard: The Influence of Abelard's Thought in the Early Scholastic Period (Cambridge, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Eckard Conrad, Rhetorica divina: Mittelhochdeutsches Prologgebete und die rhetorische Kultur des Mittelalters, Quellen and Forschungen zur Sprach- und Kulturgeschichte der germanischen Volker, n.F. 82 (206) (Berlin, 1984).Google Scholar
Maccagnolo, Enzo (ed.), Il Divino e il megacosmo: Testi filosofici e scientifici della scuola di Chartres: Teodorico di Chartres, Guglielmo di Conches, Bernardo Silvestre (Milan, 1980).Google Scholar
Manitius, M., Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters (3 vols., Munich, 1911–31).Google Scholar
Marbod, Rennes, De ornamentis verborum, PL 171, 1687–92; also ed. Leotta, R. (Florence, 1998).Google Scholar
Mari, G.I trattati medievali di ritmica latina, ed. Memorie del reale Istituto lombardo di science e lettere, 20 (Milan, 1899).Google Scholar
Martianus, Capella, De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii, ed. Willis, J. (Leipzig, 1983); tr. Stahl, W. H. et al., Martianus Capella and the Seven Liberal Arts (2 vols., New York, 1971–7).Google Scholar
Martin, Cordova, Ars praedicandi, ed. Rubio, F., ‘Ars praedicandi de Fray Martin de Cordoba’, La Ciudad de Dios, 172 (1959).Google Scholar
Martin, Dacia, Opera, ed. Roos, H., Corpus philosophorum danicorum mediiævi, 2 (Copenhagen, 1961).Google Scholar
Matonis, Ann T. E., ‘The Welsh Bardic Grammars and the Western Grammatical Tradition’, Modern Philology, 79 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, Vendôme, Ars versificatoria, in Faral, (ed.), Les Arts poétiques ; also in Opera, ed. Munari, F. (3 vols., Rome 1977–88), III. tr. Galyon, A. E. (Ames IA, 1980); also tr. Parr, R. P. (Milwaukee WI, 1981).Google Scholar
Matthew, Vendôme, In Tobiam paraphrasis metrica, in Opera, ed. , Munari, II.
McKeon, Richard, ‘Rhetoric in the Middle Ages’, Speculum, 17 (1940) ; rpt. in , R. S. S. (ed.), Critics and Criticism (Chicago, 1952).Google Scholar
Means, Michael H., ‘The Homiletic Structure of Cleanness’, Studies in Medieval Culture, 5 (1975).Google Scholar
Melli, Elio, ‘I salut e I'epistolografia medievale’, Convivium, 30 (1962).Google Scholar
Meredith, Peter, ‘Nolo Mortem and the Ludus Coventriae Play of the Woman Taken in Adultery’, MÆ, 38 (1969).Google Scholar
Merke, Thomas, Formula moderni et usitati dictaminis, in , Camargo (ed.), Rhetorics of Prose Composition.
Merrix, Robert P., ‘Sermon Structure in the Pardoner's Tale’, ChR, 17 (1983).Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul, ‘Notice sur les Corregationes Promethei d'Alexandre Neckham’, Notices et extraits, 35 (1897).Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Prosser, M. H., and Benson, T. W. (eds.), Readings in Medieval Rhetoric (Bloomington IN and London, 1973).Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair J., ‘Chaucer's Pardoner and the “Office of Preacher”’, in Boitani, P. and Torti, A. (eds.), Intellectuals and Writers in fourteenth-Century Europe (Tübingen, 1986).Google Scholar
Mroczkowski, Przemyslaw, ‘The Friar's Tale and its Pulpit Background’, in English Studies Today, Second Series, ed. Bonnard, G. A. (Bern, 1961).Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. (ed.), Three Medieval Rhetorical Arts (Berkeley CA, 1971).Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., ‘The Arts of Discourse, 1050–1400’, Mediaeval Studies, 23 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, James J., ‘The Discourse of the Future: Towards an Understanding of Medieval Literary Theory’, in Busby, K. and Lacy, N. J. (eds.), Conjunctures: Medieval Studies in Honor of Douglas Kelly (Amsterdam, 1994).Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., ‘The Middle Ages’, in Winifred Bryan Horner (ed.), The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric (Columbia MO, 1983).Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., ‘The Teaching of Latin as a Second Language in the Twelfth Century’, Hist. Ling., 7 (1980).Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., Medieval Rhetoric: A Select Bibliography (2nd edn, Toronto, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, James J., Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance (Berkeley CA, 1974).Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., (ed.), Medieval Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Medieval Rhetoric (Berkeley CA, 1978).Google Scholar
Myers, Doris E. T., ‘The Artes Praedicandi and Chaucer's Canterbury Preachers’, Ph.D. diss., University of Nebraska, 1967.Google Scholar
Nicolau, Mathieu G., L'Origine du ‘cursus’ rhythmique et les débuts de l'accent d'intensité en latin (Paris, 1930).Google Scholar
Nims, Margaret F., ‘Translatio: “Difficult Statement” in Medieval Poetic Theory’, University of Toronto Quarterly, 43 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norden, Eduard, Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance (5th edn, 2 vols., Stuttgart, 1958).Google Scholar
Ó Cuilleanáin, Cormac, Religion and the Clergy in Boccaccio's ‘Decameron’ (Rome, 1984).Google Scholar
O'Donnell, James J., Cassiodorus (Berkeley CA, 1979).Google Scholar
Olsson, Kurt, ‘Grammar, Manhood, and Tears: The Curiosity of Chaucer's Monk’, Modern Philology, 76 (1978–9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onulf, Speyer, Colores rhetorici, ed. Wattenbach, W., ‘Magister Onulf von Speier’, Sitzungsberichte der königlichen preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 20 (1894).Google Scholar
Orme, Nicholas, English Schools in the Later Middle Ages (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Owen, Nancy H., ‘The Pardoner's Introduction, Prologue, and Tale: Sermon and Fabliau’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 66 (1967).Google Scholar
Paetow, Louis J., The Arts Course at Medieval Universities with Special Reference to Grammar and Rhetoric (Champaign IL, 1910).Google Scholar
Pantin, William A. (ed.), ‘A Medieval Treatise on Letter-writing with Examples from the Rylands Latin Mediaeval Studies 394’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 13 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papias, , Ars grammatica, ed. Cervani, R. (Bologna, 1998).Google Scholar
Papias, , Vocabulista (Elementarium) (Venice, 1469; rpt. Turin, 1966).Google Scholar
Paret, G., Brunet, A., and Tremblay, P., La Renaissance du XIIe siècle: Les écoles et l'enseignement (Paris, 1933).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., ‘Punctuation, or Pause and Effect’, in Murphy (ed.), Medieval Eloquence.
Parkes, M. B., ‘The Contribution of Insular Scribes of the Seventh and Eighth Centuries to the ”Grammar of Legibility”’, in Maierù, A. (ed.), Grafia e interpunzione del latino nel medioevo (Rome, 1985).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., ‘The Literacy of the Laity’, in Daiches, D. and Thorlby, A. K. (eds.), Literature and Western Civilization (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West (Aldershot, 1992).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Scribes, Scripts and Readers: Studies in the Communication, Presentation, and Dissemination of Medieval Texts (London, 1991).Google Scholar
Parodi, Ernesto G., ‘Osservazioni sul cursus nelle opere latine e volgari del Boccaccio’, Miscellanea storica della Valdelsa, 21 (1913).Google Scholar
Passalacqua, Marina, I Codici di Prisciano (Rome, 1978).Google Scholar
Patt, William D., ‘Early Ars dictaminis as Response to a Changing Society’, Viator, 9 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Warner R., ,Three Centuries of French Poetic Theory: A Critical History of the Chief Arts of Poetry in France (1328–1630), University of Michigan Publications in Language and Literature – (2 vols., Ann Arbor MI, 1935).Google Scholar
Pattison, W. T.Raimbaut d'Aurenga, The Life and Works of the Troubadour Raimbaut d'Orange, ed. (Minneapolis MN, 1952).Google Scholar
Paul, Camadoli, ed. Sivo, V.Introductiones dictandi, Studi e ricerche dell'Istituto di Latino, 3 (Genoa, 1980).Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek, The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography (1992; rpt. Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar
Peek, George S., ‘Sermon Themes and Sermon Structure in Everyman’, South Central Bulletin, 40 (1983) –.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K., ‘The Grammatical Tradition and the Rise of the Vernaculars’, Current Trends in Linguistics, 13 (1975) –.Google Scholar
Perottus, Nicolaus, Rudimenta grammatices (Rome, 1473).Google Scholar
Peter, Helias, Summa super Priscianum, ed. Tolson, J. E., intro. Gibson, M., Cahiers de l'Institut du moyen âge grec et latin (Copenhagen, 1978) ; also ed. Reilly, L. (2 vols., Turnhout, 1993).Google Scholar
[Peter, Blois], Libellus de arte dictandi rhetorice, in , Camargo (ed.), Rhetorics of Prose Composition.
Pfander, Homer G., The Popular Sermon of the Medieval Friar in England (New York, 1937).Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan, ‘Speculative Grammar’, in Kretzman, et al.(eds.), Cambridge History of Late Medieval Philosophy,pp. –.
Pinborg, Jan, Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter (Münster, 1967).Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan, Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter: Ein Überblick (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1972).Google Scholar
Plechl, Hellmut, ‘Studien zur Tegernseer Briefsammlung des 12. Jahrhunderts’, Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 11 (1955) – ; 12 (1956) – – ; 13(1957). – –.Google Scholar
Plezia, Marian, ‘L'Origine de la théorie du cursus rythmique au Xlle siècle’, Archivum latinitatis medü æevi, 32 (1972) –.Google Scholar
Polak, Emil, ‘Dictamen’, in Stayer, J. R. (ed.), A Dictionary of the Middle Ages (10 vols., New York, 1982), IV –.Google Scholar
Polak, Emil, Medieval and Renaissance Letter Treatises and Form Letters: A Census of Manuscripts Found in Eastern Europe and the Former U.S.S.R.,Davis (Cal.) Medieval Texts and Studies, 8 (Leiden and New York, 1993).Google Scholar
Polak, Emil, Medieval and Renaissance Letter Treatises and Form Letters: A Census of Manuscripts Found in Part of Western Europe, Japan, and the United States of America,Davis (Cal.) Medieval Texts and Studies, 9 (Leiden and New York, 1994).Google Scholar
Polheim, Karl, Die lateinische Reimprosa (Berlin, 1963).Google Scholar
Pons, Provence, in Fierville, C., Une Grammaire latine inédite du XIIIe siécle (Paris, 1886).Google Scholar
Poole, Reginald L., Lectures on the History of the Papal Chancery down to the Time of Innocent III (Cambridge, 1915).Google Scholar
Pratt, Robert A., ‘Chaucer and the Hand that Fed Him’, Speculum,41 (1966) –.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priscian, , Institutio de nomine et pronomine et verbo, ed. Passalacqua, M., Testigrammaticali latini, 2 (Urbino, 1992).Google Scholar
Priscian, , Institutiones grammaticae, ed. Hertz, M. in Keil, H., Grammatici latini, ed. H. Keil (8 vols, Leipzig, 1857–80), 2, 1–597, and 3.
Priscian, , Opuscula, ed. Passalacqua, M. (2 vols., Rome, 1987–99).Google Scholar
Priscian, Quintilian, Institutio oratoria, ed. and tr. as The Orator's Education by Russell, D. A. (5 vols., Cambridge, MA and London, 2001).Google Scholar
Purcell, William M., ‘Ars poetriae’: Rhetorical and Grammatical Invention at the Margin of Literacy (Columbia SC, 1996).Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, Franz, ‘Zur Theorie der Komposition in der mittelalterlichen Rhetorik und Poetik’, in Vickers, B. (ed.), Rhetoric Revalued: Papers from the International Society for the History of Rhetoric (Binghamton NY, 1982) –.Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, Franz, Die antike Theorie der Genera dicendi im lateinischen Mittelalter, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophischhistorische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 241, 2 (Vienna, 1962).Google Scholar
Quilligan, Maureen, ‘Allegory, Allegoresis, and the Deallegorization of Language: The Roman de la Rose, the De planctu naturae, and the Parlement of Foules’, in Bloomfield, M. (ed.), Allegory, Myth, and Symbol, Harvard English Studies, 9 (1981) –.Google Scholar
Quilligan, Maureen, ‘Words and Sex: The Language of Allegory in the De planctu naturae, the Roman de la Rose, and Book III of The Faerie Queen’, Allegorica, 2 (1977) –.Google Scholar
Rabanus, Maurus, De clericorum institutione, Patrologia cursus completus, series latina, ed. Migne, J.-P. (217 vols. and 4 vols. of tables, Paris, 1841–64). 107.Google Scholar
Ralph, Beauvais, Close super Donatum, ed. Kneepkens, C. H. (Nijmegen, 1982).Google Scholar
Reinsma, Luke, ‘The Middle Ages’, in Horner, W. B. (ed.), Historical Rhetoric: An Annotated Bibliography of Sources in English (Boston MA, 1980) –.Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentum in Donati artem maiorem, ed. Hagen, H., Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig, 1857–80) Suppl. (vol. 8), and Elder, J. P., ‘The Missing Portions of the Commentum Einsidlense on Donatus's Ars Grammatica’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 56 (1947).Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Glosses on Bede, De arte metrica, ed. King, M. H., Bedae opera didascalica, Corpus Christianorum, series latina 123A (Turnhout, 1975).Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Glosses on Prudentius, ed. Burnam, J. M., Commentaire anonyme sur Prudence d'après le manuscrit 413 de Valenciennes (Paris, 1910).Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Glosses on Sedulius, Carmen paschale, in Sedulius, Opera omnia, ed. , Huemer.
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentarius in Phocam, ed. Manitius, M., Didaskaleion, 2 (1913).
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentarius in Prisciani institutionem de nomine, ed. Marco, M., Aevum, 26 (1952).
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentarius in Boetii consolationem philosophiae (extracts), ed. Silk, E. T., Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome, 9 (Rome, 1935).Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentarius in Disticha Catonis, ed. Mancini, A., Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, 5th ser. II (1902).Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentum in Donati artem minorem, ed. Fox, W. (Leipzig, 1902).Google Scholar
Remigius, Auxerre, Commentum in Martianum Capellam, Libri I–II, ed. Lutz, C. E. (Leiden, 1962).Google Scholar
Richard, Pophis, ed. Batzer, E., ‘Zur Kenntnis der Formularsammlung des Richard von Pofi’, Heidelberger Abhandlungen zur mittleren und neueren Geschichte, 28 (1910).Google Scholar
Richard, Thetford, Ars dilatandi sermones, ed. and tr. Engelhardt, G. J., ‘A Treatise on the Eight Modes of Dilatation’, Allegorica, 3 (1978).Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry Gerald, ‘Business Training in Medieval Oxford’, American Historical Review, 46 (1941) –.Google Scholar
Rickert, Edith, ‘Chaucer at School’, Modern Philology, 29 (1932) –.Google Scholar
Rico, Francisco, Predicación y literatura en la España medieval (Cadiz, 1977).Google Scholar
Riessner, C., Die ‘Magnae derivationes’ des Uguccione da Pisa und ihre Bedeutung für die romanische Philologie (Rome, 1965).Google Scholar
Robert, Basevorn, Forma praedicandi, ed. , Charland, Artes praedicandi ; tr. in Murphy, , Three Medieval Rhetorical Arts.
Roberts, Phyllis Barzillay, Stephanus de Lingua-Tonante: Studies in the Sermons of Stephen Langton (Toronto, 1968).Google Scholar
Robins, R. H., A Short History of Linguistics (2nd edn, London, 1979).Google Scholar
Robins, R. H., Ancient and Medieval Grammatical Theory in Europe (London, 1951).Google Scholar
Robson, C. A., Maurice of Sully and the Medieval Vernacular Homily (Oxford, 1952).Google Scholar
Rockinger, Summa de arte prosandi, in (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Rockinger, Summa de ordine et processu iudicii spiritualis, in (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Rockinger, , Formularius de modo prosandi, in (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Rockinger, Ludwig (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher des 11. bis 14. Jahrhunderts, Quellen und Erörterungen zur bayerischen und deutschen Geschichte, 9 (2 vols., 1863; rpt. New York, 1961).Google Scholar
Rollinson, Philip, Classical Theories of Allegory and Christian Culture (Pittsburg PA, 1980).Google Scholar
Roos, Heinrich, ‘Die Stellung der Grammatik im Lehrbetrieb des 13. Jahrhunderts’, in Koch, (ed.), Artes libérales,pp. –.
Roos, Heinrich, ‘Le Trivium à Xllle siècle’, Arts libéraux,pp. –.
Rosier, I., La Grammaire spéculative des modistes(Lille, 1983).Google Scholar
Rosier, Catach I., ‘Roger Bacon: Grammar’, in Hackett, J. (ed.), Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 57 (Leiden, 1997) –.Google Scholar
Ross, W. O.Middle English Sermons, Early English Text Society, Original Series 209 (London, 1940).Google Scholar
Ross, W. O., ‘A Brief Forma predicandi’, Modern Philology, 34 (1936–7) –.Google Scholar
Roth, Dorothea, Die mittelalterliche Predigttheorie und das ‘Manuale curatorum’ des Johann Ulrich Surgant (Basel, 1956).Google Scholar
Ruhe, Ernstpeter, De amasio ad amasiam: Zur Gattungsgeschichte des mittelalterlichen Liebesbriefes, Beiträge zur romanischen Philologie des Mittelalters, 10(Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
Ruiz, Juan, Libra de buen amor, ed. Gybbon-Monypenny, G. B. (Madrid, 1988).Google Scholar
Samaran, Charles, ‘Une Summa grammaticalis du Xllle siècle avec gloses provençales’, Archivum latinitatis medii aevi (Bulletin du Cange), 31 (1961) –.Google Scholar
Sambin, Paolo, ‘Un certame dettatorio tra due notai pontifici (1260): Lettere inedite di Giordano da Terracina e di Giovanni da Capua’, Note e discussioni erudite,5 (Rome, 1955) –.Google Scholar
Sampson, , , Thomas, Modus dictandi, in , Camargo (ed.), Rhetorics of Prose Composition.
Scaglione, Aldo, ‘Ars grammatica’: A Bibliographic Survey, Two Essays on the Grammar of the Latin and Italian Subjunctive, and A Note on the Ablative Absolute, Janua linguarum, series minor, 77 (The Hague, 1970).Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo, The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present: A Historical Survey, University of North Carolina Studies in Comparative Literature, 53 (Chapel Hill NC, 1972).Google Scholar
Schalk, Fritz, ‘Zur Entwicklung der Artes in Frankreich und Italien’, in Koch, (ed.), Artes liberales.
Schaller, Dieter, ‘Probleme der Überlieferung und Verfasserschaft lateinischer Liebesbriefe des hohen Mittelalters’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch, 3 (1966).Google Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin, ‘Ars dictaminis, Ars dictandi’, Lexikon des Mittelalters, I (Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin, ‘Dichtungslehren und Briefsteller’, in Weimar, P. (ed.), Die Renaissance der Wissenschaften im 12. Jahrhundert (Zurich, 1981).Google Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin, ‘Die Kanzlei Kaiser Friedrichs II: Ihr Personal und ihr Sprachstil. I. Teil: Das Personal der Kanzlei’, Archiv für Diplomatik, Schriftgeschichte, Siegel- und Wappenkunde, 4 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin, ‘Studien zur Briefsammlung des Kardinals Thomas von Capua’, Deutsches Archiv, 21 (1965).Google Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin, ‘Zur Entstehung der sogenannten Briefsammlung des Petrus de Vinea’, Archiv, 12 (1956).Google Scholar
Schiaffini, Alfredo, Tradizione e poesia nella prosa d'arte italiana dalla latinità medievale al Boccaccio (2nd edn, 1943; rpt. Rome, 1969).Google Scholar
Schmale, F.-J.Precepta prosaici dictaminis secundum Tullium, (Bonn, 1950).Google Scholar
Schmale, Franz-Josef, ‘Der Briefsteller Bernhards von Meung’, Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Instituts für Geschichtsforschung, 66 (1958).Google Scholar
Schmale, Franz-Josef, ‘Die Bologneser Schule der Ars dictandi’, Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 13 (1957).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Wolfgang O., ‘Die Ianua (Donatus): Ein Beitrag zur lateinischen Schulgrammatik des Mittelalters und der Renaissance’, Beiträge zur Inkunabelkunde, 3.4 (1969).Google Scholar
Schneyer, Johannes Baptist, ‘Eine Sermonesliste des Nicolaus de Byard OFM’, AFH, 60 (1967).Google Scholar
Schneyer, Johannes Baptist, Geschichte der katholischen Predigt (Freiburg i. Br., 1969).Google Scholar
Schroeder, C.Facetus (incipit: ‘Cum nihil utilius’), in Der deutsche Facetus, ed. Palaestra 86 (Berlin, 1911).Google Scholar
Scolari, A.Il Trattatello di colori rettorici, ed. ‘Un volgarizzamento trecentesco della Rhetorica ad Herennium’, Medioevo romanzo, 9 (1984).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Walter B., ‘The Style and Vocabulary of the Latin Arts of Poetry of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, Speculum, 3 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedulius, , Opera omnia, ed. Huemer, J., CSEL 10 (Vienna, 1885).Google Scholar
Shain, C. E., ‘Pulpit Rhetoric in Three Canterbury Tales’, Modern Language Notes, 70 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siger, Courtrai, Summa modorum significandi, ed. Pinborg, J., (Amsterdam, 1977).Google Scholar
Simon, Dacia, Opera, ed. Otto, A., Corpus philosophorum danicorum medii ævi, 3 (Copenhagen, 1963).Google Scholar
Simon, , Master, , Notabilia super summa de arte dictandi, in , Rockinger (ed.), Briefsteller und Formelbücher.
Smalley, Beryl, ‘Oxford University Sermons 1290–1293’, in Alexander, J. J. G. and Gibson, M. T. (eds.), Medieval Learning and Literature: Essays Presented to R. W. Hunt (Oxford, 1976).Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl, English Friars and Antiquity in the Early Fourteenth Century (Oxford, 1960).Google Scholar
Southern, R. W., ‘From Schools to University’, in Catto, J. I. (ed.), The History of the University of Oxford, I: The Early Oxford Schools (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
Southern, R. W., Medieval Humanism and Other Studies (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Spallone, Mario, ‘La trasmissione della Rhetorica ad Herennium nell' Italia meridionale tra il'XI e il XII secolo’, Bolletino del comitato par la preparazione dell'edizione nazionale dei classici greci e latini, I (1980).Google Scholar
Spearing, A. C., ‘The Art of Preaching and Piers Plowman’, in Spearing, Criticism and Medieval Poetry (London, 1964) ; (2nd edn, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Stobbe, Otto, ‘Summa curiae regis: Ein Formelbuch aus der Zeit König Rudolf's I und Albrechts I’, Archiv für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde, 32 (1907; rpt. 1984).Google Scholar
Stock, Brian, The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Princeton NJ, 1983).Google Scholar
Stockton, Eric W., ‘The Deadliest Sin in The Pardoner's Tale’, Tennessee Studies in Literature, 6 (1961).Google Scholar
Szarmach, Paul E., and Huppé, Bernard F. (eds.), The Old English Homily and its Backgrounds (Albany NY, 1978).Google Scholar
Szklenar, Hans, Magister Nicolaus de Dybin, Vorstudien zu einer Edition seiner Schriften: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der literarischen Rhetorik im späteren Mittelalter (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Taylor, John, ‘Letters and Letter-Collections in England, 1300–1420’, Nottingham Medieval Studies, 28 (1980).Google Scholar
The First Grammatical Treatise [Icelandic], ed. Benediktsson, H.University of Iceland Publications in Linguistics, 1 (Reykjavik, 1972).Google Scholar
Thiry, Claude, ‘Rhétorique et genres littéraires au XVe siècle’, in Wilmet, M. (ed.), Sémantique lexicale et sémantique grammaticale en moyen français: Colloque organisé par le Centre d'études linguistiques et littéraires de la Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Septembre, 1978) (Brussels, 1980).Google Scholar
Thomas, Capua, Ars dictandi, ed. Heller, E., Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, 4 (Heidelberg, 1929).Google Scholar
Thomas, Chobham, Summa de arte praedicandi, ed. Morenzoni, F., Corpus Christianorum, continuatio medievalis 82 (Turnhout, 1988).Google Scholar
Thomas, Erfurt, Grammatica speculativa, ed. and tr. Bursill-Hall, G. L. (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Thomson, David, ‘The Oxford Grammar Masters Revisited’, Mediaeval Studies, 45 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, David, A Descriptive Catalogue of Middle English Grammatical Texts (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
Thomson, David, An Edition of Middle English Grammatical Texts (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Thomson, David, and Murphy, J. J., ‘Dictamen as a Developed Genre: The Fourteenth-Century Brevis doctrina dictaminis of Ventura da Bergamo’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 23 (1982).Google Scholar
Thomson, , Ian, , and Perraud, , Louis, (tr.), Ten Latin Schooltexts of the Later Middle Ages (Lewiston ME and Queenston, 1990).Google Scholar
Thomson, S. Harrison, ‘Robert Kilwardby's Commentaries In Priscianum and In Barbarismum Donati’, New Scholasticism, 12 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurot, Charles, ‘Notices et extracts de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l'histoire des doctrines grammaticales au Moyen Âge’, Notices et extraits, 22 (1869; rpt. 1964).Google Scholar
Tibber, P., ‘The Origins of the Scholastic Sermon, c. 1130–1210’, D. Phil. diss., Oxford University, 1983.Google Scholar
Tilliette, Jean-Yves, Des Mots à la parole: Une lecture de la ‘Poetria nova’ de Geoffroy de Vinsauf (Geneva, 2000).Google Scholar
Tommasino, Armannino, Microcosmus, ed. Bertoni, G., Archivum romanicum, 5 (1921).Google Scholar
Travis, Peter W., ‘Chaucer's Trivial Fox Chase and the Peasant's Revolt’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 18 (1988).Google Scholar
TravisW., Peter, ‘Reading Chaucer ab ovo: Mock-exemplum in the Nun's Priest's Tale’, in Paxson, J. J., Clopper, L. M. and Tomasch, S. (eds.), The Performance of Middle English Culture: Essays on Chaucer and the Drama in Honor of Martin Stevens (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Tunberg, Terence O., ‘What is Boncompagno's “Newest Rhetoric”?’, Traditio, 42 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Pierre L., ‘Juan Ruiz's Prologue’, Modern Language Notes, 82 (1967).Google Scholar
Usher, Jonathan, ‘Frate Cipolla's ars praedicandi or a “récit du discours” in Boccaccio’, Modern Language Review, 88 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valois, Noël, De arte scribendi epistolas apud Gallicos medii aevi scriptores rhetoresve (Paris, 1880).Google Scholar
Vantuono, W.The ‘Pearl’ Poems: An Omnibus Edition, (2 vols., New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Vantuono, William, ‘The Structure and Sources of Patience’, Mediaeval Studies, 34 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchi, Giuseppe, ”Il “proverbio” nella pratica letteraria dei dettatori della scuola di Bologna’, Studi mediolatini e volgari, 2 (1954).Google Scholar
Vecchi, Giuseppe, Il magistero delle ‘Artes’ latine a Bologna nel medioevo, Publicazioni della Facoltà di Magistero Università di Bologna, 2 (Bologna, 1958).Google Scholar
Ventura da, Bergamo, Brevis doctrina dictaminis, ed. Thomson, D. and Murphy, J. J., Studi medievali, 3rd ser. 23 (1982).Google Scholar
Vergilius, Maro Grammaticus, Epitomi ed Epistole, ed. Polara, G., (Naples, 1979).Google Scholar
Victorinus, Marius, Ars grammatica, ed. Keil, H., Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig), 6.
Victorinus, Maximus, Ars grammatica, ed. Keil, H., Grammatici latini, ed. Keil, H. (8 vols, Leipzig), 6.
Vinaver, Eugene, Études sur le ‘Tristan’ en prose: les sources, les manuscripts, bibliographie critique (Paris, 1925).Google Scholar
Vincent, Beauvais, Speculum quadruplex sive Speculum maius (1624; rpt. Graz, 1965).Google Scholar
Voigts, Linda E., ‘A Letter from a Middle English Dictaminal Formulary in Harvard Law Library MS 43’, Speculum, 56 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, David (ed.), The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages (Bloomington IN, 1983).Google Scholar
Waleys, , Thomas, , De modo componendi sermones, ed. , Charland, Artes praedicandi. Grosser, D. E., tr. M.A. diss., Cornell University, 1949.Google Scholar
Ward, John O., Ciceronian Rhetoric in Treatise, Scholion and Commentary (Turnhout, 1995).Google Scholar
Wendehorst, Alfred, Tabula formarum curie episcope: Das Formularbuch der Würzburger Bischofskanzlei von ca. 1324, Quellen und Forschungen zur Geschichte des Bistums und Hochstifts Würzburg, 13 (Würzburg, 1957).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘A Sermon in Praise of Philosophy’, Traditio, 50 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘Academic Sermons at Oxford in the Early Fifteenth Century’, Speculum, 70 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘Chaucer and the Language of Contemporary Preaching’, Studies in Philology, 73 (1976).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘Medieval Sermons and the Study of Literature’, in Boitani, P. and Torti, A. (eds.), Medieval and Pseudo-Medieval Literature (Tübingen, 1984).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘Medieval Sermons’, in Alford, John A. (ed.), A Companion to Piers Plowman (Berkeley CA, 1988).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘Notes on the Parson's Tale’, The Chaucer Review, 16 (1982).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘The Joyous Art of Preaching; or, the Preacher and the Fabliau’, Anglia, 97 (1979).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, ‘Macaronic Sermons: Bilingualism and Preaching in Late-Medieval England (Ann Arbor MI, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, Preachers, Poets, and the Early English Lyric (Princeton NJ, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried, Verses in Sermons: ‘Fasciculus Morum’ and its Middle English Poems (Cambridge MA, 1978).Google Scholar
Wieruszowski, Helen, ‘A Twelfth-Century Ars dictaminis in the Barberini Collection of the Vatican Library’, in Wieruszowski, Politics and Culture in Medieval Spain and Italy (Rome, 1971).Google Scholar
Wieruszowski, Helen, ‘Arezzo as a Center of Learning and Letters in the Thirteenth Century’, Traditio, 9 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieruszowski, Helen, ‘Rhetoric and the Classics in Italian Education of the Thirteenth Century’, Studia graziana, II (1967).Google Scholar
Wieruszowski, Helen, ‘Ars dictaminis in the Time of Dante’, Medievalia et humanistica, I (1943).Google Scholar
William, Auvergne, Ars praedicandi, ed. Poorter, A., ‘Un manuel de prédication médiévale: Le ms. 97 de Bruges’, Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie, 25 (1923).Google Scholar
William, Ockham, Summa Logicae, pars prima, pars secunda, tertiae prima, ed. Boehner, P. (2 vols., St Bonaventure NY). partially tr. Loux, M. J., Ockham's Theory of Terms: Part 1 of the ‘Summa logicae’ (Notre Dame IN, 1974).Google Scholar
Williams, David, ‘The Point of Patience’, Modern Philology, 68 (1970–71).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Edward, The Gawain-Poet (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar
Witt, Ronald, ‘Boncompagno and the Defense of Rhetoric’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 16 (1986).Google Scholar
Witt, Ronald, ‘Medieval Ars dictaminis and the Beginnings of Humanism: A New Construction of the Problem’, Renaissance Quarterly, 35 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Ronald, ‘Medieval Italian Culture and the Origins of Humanism as a Stylistic Ideal’, in Rabil, A. Jr. (ed.), Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy (2 vols., Philadelphia PA, 1988), I.Google Scholar
Witt, Ronald, ‘On Bene of Florence's Conception of the French and Roman Cursus’, Rhetorica, 3 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M. C.An Early Commentary on the ‘Poetria nova’ of Geoffrey of Vinsauf, ed. (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Worstbrock, Franz Josef, ‘Die Antikenrezeption in der mittelalterlichen und der humanistischen Ars dictandi’ in Buck, A. (ed.), Die Rezeption der Antike: zum Problem der Kontinuität zwischen Mittelalter und Renaissance, Wolfenbütteler Abhandlungen zur Renaissance-Forschung, I (Hamburg, 1981).Google Scholar
Worstbrock, Franz Josef, Repertorium der ‘Artes dictandi’ des Mittelalters, I: Von den Anfängen bis um 1200, Münstersche Mittelalter-Schriften, 66 (Munich, 1992).Google Scholar
Wright, Roger, ‘Late Latin and Early Romance: Alcuin's De orthographia and the Council of Tours (813 A.D.)’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, 3 (1981).Google Scholar
Wright, Roger, Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France (Liverpool, 1982).Google Scholar
Zaccagnini, Guido, ‘Lettere ed orazioni dei grammatici dei secc. XIII e XIV’, Archivum romanicum, 7 (1923).Google Scholar
Zaccagnini, Guido, La vita dei maestri e degli scholari nello studio di Bologna nei secoli XIII e XIV, Biblioteca dell’Archivum romanicum, Ist ser. 5 (Geneva, 1926).Google Scholar
Zafarana, Zelina, ‘La predicazione francescana’, in Atti dell' VIII Congresso della Società internazionale de studi francescani, 1980 (Assisi, 1981).Google Scholar
Zink, Michel, La prédication en langue romane avant 1300 (Paris, 1976xs).Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, Jan, Alan of Lille's Grammar of Sex: The Meaning of Grammar to a Twelfth-Century Intellectual (Cambridge MA, 1985).Google Scholar
Zöllner, Walter, ‘Eine neue Bearbeitung der Flores dictaminum des Bernhard von Meung’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 13, 5 (1964).Google Scholar
Zöllner, Walter (ed.), ‘Die Halberstädter Ars Dictandi aus den Jahren 1193–94’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Halberstadter Universität, 13 (1964).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×