Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T11:28:28.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The evolution of a theory of artistic prose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
George A. Kennedy
Edited by
George Alexander Kennedy
George Alexander Kennedy
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Get access

Summary

Literary prose first emerges in the middle of the fifth century BC in writings in the Ionic dialect, including the Histories of Herodotus, then in the Attic dialect in the oratory of the Siciliạn Gorgias and the Athenian Antiphon, and is seen at the end of the century in Thucydides' History. Oratory and history, throughout antiquity, remain privileged prose genres, to which is added as a third the philosophical dialogue, developed by Plato in the fourth century. Except for a very few references to the literary epistle, ancient critics ignore all other prose forms as sub-literary. History, with its mixture of narrative and set speeches, may be thought of as corresponding to epic in poetry, the dialogue to drama; epideictic oratorỵ, seen in the display speeches of sophists, such as that attributed to Lysias in Plato's Phaedrus, or in funeral orations or speeches at festivals, has some relationship to lyric forms, such as the hymn, but the chief poetic antecedents of deliberative oratory are found in the debates in epic.

Aristotle claims (Rhetoric of Aristotle 1.1404a20 - 39) that prose became artistic in the first instance by borrowing stylistic features from poetry; a more accurate statement might be that analogies were created to the effects of poetic sound and rhythm, seen in the so-called Gorgianic figures of isocolon, paronomasia, homoeoteleuton, and the like. These are flagrantly indulged by Gorgias himself and found in more restrained form in Thucydides and elsewhere. As pointed out in chapter 1, section 3 above, ‘prose’ assumes the prior existence of ‘poetry’.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 184 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahl, Frederick, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Barry, Studies in Aulus Gellius (Lawrence, Kansas, 1975).Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
Becker, Carl, Das Spätwork des Horaz (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F., Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool, 1949).Google Scholar
Bowersock, Glen, Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. et al., Varron; six exposés (Entretien Hardt, 9) (Geneva, 1963).Google Scholar
Brink, C. O., ‘Philodemus, Peri poiēmatōn, Book IV’, Maia, 24 (1972).Google Scholar
Brink, C. O., Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar
Bulloch, A. W. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.
Cairns, Francis, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar
Cavazza, Franco, Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar
Champlin, E. J., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, Michael, Roman Satire (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Cope, E. M., An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar
D'Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (London, 1931; rpt. New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Dahlmann, Hellfried, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
Dahlmann, Hellfried, Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar
de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLacy, Phillip, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948).Google Scholar
DeLacy, Phillip, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar
Dingel, Joachim, Seneca und die Dichtung (Heidelberg, 1974).Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E., ‘A Ciceronian contribution to rhetorical theory’, Eranos, 55 (1957).Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E., ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
Duret, Luc, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
Eden, Kathy, Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition (Princeton, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, K. V., Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar
Erickson, K. V. (ed.), Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar
Fairweather, Janet, Seneca the Elder (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979).Google Scholar
Flashar, Hellmut (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus on delivery’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985).Google Scholar
Friedlander, Paul, ‘The pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius' De rerum nature’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941).Google Scholar
Gaines, R. N., ‘Qualities of rhetorical expression in Philodemus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 112 (1982).Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M., Understanding Terence (Princeton, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeser, Andreas, ‘The Stoic theory of meaning’, in Rist, J. M. (ed.), The Stoics (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
Greenberg, N. A., ‘Metathesis as an instrument in the criticism of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 89 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, N. A., ‘The use of poiēma and poiēsis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 65 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimal, Pierre, Horace: Art poetique (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Grimaldi, W. M. A., Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric (Hermes Einzelschriften, 25) (Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A., ‘Theodorus of Gadara’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 80 (1959).Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A., ‘Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 73 (1952).Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A., The Greek and Roman Critics (London, 1965).Google Scholar
Guillemin, A. M., Pline et la vie littéraire de son temps (Paris, 1929).Google Scholar
Hellwig, Antje, Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38) (Göttingen, 1973).Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, Leofranc, Aulus Gellius (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M., ‘The collegium poetarum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 23 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, A., ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
Imbert, Claude, ‘Stoic logic and Alexandrian poetics’, in Schofield, Malcolm et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
Innes, D. C., ‘Theophrastus and the theory of style’, Rutgers University Studies, 2(1985).Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner, Early Christianity and Greek Paideia (Cambridge, Mass., 1961).Google Scholar
Jordan, W. J., ‘Aristotle's concept of metaphor in rhetoric’, in Erickson, (ed.), Aristotle (see above).
Kennedy, G. A., ‘Encoplius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times (Chapel Hill, 1980).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., Quintilian (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., The Art of Persuasion in Greece (Princeton, 1963).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World (Princeton, 1972).Google Scholar
Klingner, Friedrich, ‘Horazens Brief an die Pisonem’, Berichte der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 88 (1936).Google Scholar
Latte, Kurt, ‘Reste frühellenistischer Poetik im Pisonembrief des Horaz, Hermes, 60 (1925).Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers (2 vols., Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F., ‘Filodemo: La Rhetorica e la Musica’, in Syzetesis: Studi offerti a Marcello Gigante (Naples, 1983).Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W., ‘The poet, the critic, and the moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 27 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C. W., ‘The poetry of ethics in Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 69 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marache, Rene, La critique littéraire de langue latine et le développement du gout archaïsant au if siècle de notre ère (Rennes, 1952).Google Scholar
Michel, Alain, Le dialogue des orateurs de Tacite et la philosophie de Cicéron (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Michel, Alain, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l'art de persuader (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo, Greek Biography (Cambridge, 1971).Google Scholar
Norden, Eduard, ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes, 40 (1905).Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Rudolf, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
Podlecki, A. J., ‘The Peripatetics as literary critics’, Phoenix, 23 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Karin, Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysius von Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, Franz, ‘Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d.J.’, Wiener Studien, 51 (1958).Google Scholar
Quinn, Kenneth, ‘The poet and his audience in the Augustan age’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
Rawson, Elizabeth, Cicero: A Portrait (London, 1975; rev. ed., Ithaca, 1983).Google Scholar
Rawson, Elizabeth, Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Rollinson, Philip, Allegory. See above, General works.
Rostagni, Arnaldo, ‘Filodemo contro l'estetica classica’, Scritti minori (Turin, 1965).Google Scholar
Rudd, Niall, The Satires of Horace (Cambridge, 1966).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A., ‘Ars poetica’, in Costa, C. D. N. (ed.), Horace (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A., ‘De imitatione’, in West, D. and Woodman, A. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
Sbordone, Francesca, Sui papiri della Poetica di Filodemo (Naples, 1983).Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M., ‘Hoi kritikoi in Philodemus’, Mnemosyne, 21 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M., ‘Strabo on Homer’, Mnemosyne, 29 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M., Studies in Demetrius (Amsterdam, 1964).Google Scholar
Shorey, Paul, ‘Phusis, Meletē, Epistēmē’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 40 (1909).Google Scholar
Skutsch, Otto (ed.), Ennius: sept exposés (Entretien Hardt, 17) (Geneva, 1972).Google Scholar
Slater, W. J., ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus’, Phoenix, 30 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. W., The Art of Rhetoric in Alexandria (The Hague, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J. M., Puns and Poetry in Lucretius' De Rerum Natura (Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941); rpt. in Erickson, (ed.), Classical Heritage, (see above).Google Scholar
Steidle, Wolf, Studien zur Ars poetica des Horaz; Interpretation des auf Dichtkunst und Gedicht bezüglichen Hauptteiles, Verse 1–294 (Würzburg, 1939).Google Scholar
Stroux, Johannes, De Theophrasti Virtutibus Dicendi (Leipzig, 1912).Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P., ‘Petronius, Seneca, and Lucan: A literary feud’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. P., The Satyricon of Petronius: A Literary Study (Bloomington, Indiana, 1968).Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A., The Elder Seneca (Leiden, 1978).Google Scholar
Syme, Ronald, Tacitus (2 vols., Oxford, 1958).Google Scholar
Trimpi, Wesley, Muses of One Mind: The Literary Analysis of Experience and its Continuity (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
Williams, G. W., Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
Williams, G. W., Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry (Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael, ‘Cicero and the silver age’, in Ludwig, Walther (ed.), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron (Entretiens Hardt, 27) (Geneva, 1982).Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W., ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l'époque hellénistique’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 88 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooten, C. W., Cicero's Philippics and their Demosthenic Model (Chapel Hill, 1983).Google Scholar
Zanker, G., ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, Rheinische Museum, 124 (1981).Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G., ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian poet’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×