Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:50:47.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

51 - Combative criticism: Jonson, Milton, and classical literary criticism in England

from NEOCLASSICAL ISSUES: BEAUTY, JUDGEMENT, PERSUASION, POLEMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Colin Burrow
Edited by
Glyn P. Norton
Glyn P. Norton
Affiliation:
Williams College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

English literary criticism between 1580 and 1670 is often regarded as the poor relation of Europe. The classicizing remarks of many English critics in the period might seem on the face of it to justify this opinion. In 1591 Sir John Harington, in his defence of Ariosto's Orlando furioso, claimed that neoclassical critics ‘would have an heroicall Poem (as well as a Tragedie) to be full of Peripeteia, which I interpret an agnition of some unlooked for fortune either good or bad, and a sudden change thereof: of this what store there be the reader shall quickly find’. Aristotle does argue that anagnorisis (Harington's ‘agnition’) and peripeteia (‘reversal of fortune’) should ideally coincide (Poetics 1452a), but he would balk at Harington's conflation of the two into a composite which can be liberally sprinkled over any heroic poem. Edmund Spenser also shows a weak grasp on neoclassical principles and vocabulary in his Letter to Ralegh, appended to The Faerie Queene (1590). He shows some awareness of Horace's recommendation that a heroic poem should not begin ‘ab ovo’ (Ars poetica 147): ‘a Poet thrusteth into the middest, … and there recoursing to the thinges forepast, and diuining of thinges to come, maketh a pleasing analysis of all’. But his critical remarks are belied by his practice: The Faerie Queene does not begin in the middle of a single action in anything like the sense that Spenser, or Horace, claimed it should. In the same period George Puttenham presented his Arte of English poesie (published 1589) in the form of a rhetorical manual, which minimizes the importance of narrative structure in favour of the schemes and tropes of rhetoric.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 485 - 499
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davenant, William Sir, Gondibert, ed. Gladish, D. F., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Dryden, John, Essays, ed. Ker, W. P., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Dürer, AlbrechtThe painter's manual, trans. with comm. by Strauss, W. L. (New York: Abaris, 1977).Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M.The light in Troy: imitation and discovery in Renaissance poetry, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Guillory, JohnPoetic authority: Spenser, Milton and literary history (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Hall, John is described as ‘not altogether left-handed in Prose’, Vacivae, Horae (London: E. G. for J. Rothwell, 1646).Google Scholar
Hardison, O. B. Jr. ‘The orator and the poet: the dilemma of humanist literature’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance studies 1 (1971).Google Scholar
Hardison, O. B. Jr. ‘The two voices of Sidney's Apology for poetry’ in Sidney in retrospect: selections from English literary Renaissance, ed. Kinney, A. F., Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Baxter, The age of criticism: the late Renaissance in Italy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Heinsius, Daniel, On plot in tragedy (De tragoediae constitutione) (1611); trans. and ed. Sellin, P. R. and McManmon, J. J., Northridge, CA: San Fernando Valley State College, 1971.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben, Ben Jonson [Works], ed. Herford, C. H. and , P. and Simpson, E., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925–52, 11 vols. [Edition under reissue with corrections, 1986–].Google Scholar
Ker, W. P.Essays of John Dryden, ed., 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900), vol. i.Google Scholar
Longinus, , Peri hupsous, or Dionysius Longinus of the heights of eloquence, trans. Hall, John, London: R. Daniel for F. Eaglesfield, 1652.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence, Convention: 1500–1700, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
McPherson, D. ‘Ben Jonson's library and marginalia: an annotated catalogue’, Studies in philology 71 (1974), Appendix.Google Scholar
Milton, John, Complete prose works, ed. Wolfe, D. M., et al., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953–82, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Milton, John, Poems, ed. Carey, J. and Fowler, A., Harlow: Longmans, 1968.Google Scholar
Molesworth, William SirEnglish works, ed., 11 vols. (London: John Bohn, 1839–45), vol. vi.Google Scholar
Mueller, Martin, ‘Sixteenth-century Italian criticism and Milton's theory of catharsis’, Studies in English literature 6 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Richard S.Imitation and praise in the poems of Ben Jonson, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Pigman, G. W. III, ‘Versions of imitation in the Renaissance’, Renaissance quarterly 33 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossky, William, ‘Imagination in the English Renaissance: psychology and poetic’, Studies in the Renaissance 5 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, Irene, ‘The development of Milton's poetics’, Publications of the modern language association of America 92 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellin, Paul R. ‘Milton and Heinsius: theoretical homogeneity’, in Medieval epic to the ‘epic theatre’ of Brecht: essays in comparative literature, ed. Amato, R. P. and Spalek, J. M., University of Southern California studies in comparative literature 1, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Sellin, Paul R. ‘Sources of Milton's catharsis: a reconsideration’, Journal of English and Germanic philology 60 (1961).Google Scholar
Smith, G. G. (ed.), Elizabethan critical essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Smith, G. Gregory (ed.), Elizabethan critical essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Snyder, Susan, Pastoral process: Spenser, Marvell, Milton, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund, The Faerie Queene, ed. Hamilton, A. C., London and New York: Longman, 1977.Google Scholar
Spingarn, J. E. (ed.), Critical essays of the seventeenth century, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908–9, 3 vols. [Reprint Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1957].Google Scholar
Steadman, John M.The walls of paradise: essays on Milton's poetics, Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×