Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:27:08.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Marshall Brown
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans, The study of language in England 1780–1860, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Aarsleff, Hans, ‘Wordsworth, language and Romanticism’, Essays in criticism 30 (1980), pp. 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, M. H., ‘Structure and style in the greater romantic lyric’, in From sensibility to romanticism: essays presented to Frederick A. Pottle, Hilles, F. W. and Bloom, Harold (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1965, pp. 527–60.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H., ‘Structure and style in the greater romantic lyric’, Natural supernaturalism: tradition and revolution in Romantic literature, New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Abrams, Meyer H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H., Natural supernaturalism: tradition and revolution in Romantic literature, New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H., The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Norton, 1958.Google Scholar
Adams, Hazard, ‘Revisiting Reynolds's Discourses and Blake's annotations’, in Essick, Robert E. and Pearce, Donald (eds.), Blake in his time, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1978, pp. 128–44.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., and Horkheimer, Max, Dialectic of Enlightenment, Cumming, John (trans.), London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar
Albert, Georgia, ‘Understanding irony: three essays on Friedrich Schlegel’, MLN, 108 (1993), pp. 825–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, Mary, ‘A receipt for writing a novel’, in Hughes, Joanna (ed.), Poems, London: Dilly, 1799, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
Alford, Steven, Irony and the logic of the Romantic imagination, New York: Lang, 1984.Google Scholar
Alison, Archibald, Essays on the nature and principles of taste, 1790, rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1968.Google Scholar
Allemann, Beda, Ironie und Dichtung, Pfüllingen: Neske, 1956.Google Scholar
Allemann, Beda, ‘Ironie als literarisches Prinzip’, in Ironie und Dichtung, Schaefer, Albert (ed.), Munich: Beck, 1970, pp. 11–37.Google Scholar
Allemann, Beda, Irony and the discourse of modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Allemann, Beda, Ironie und literarische Moderne, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997.Google Scholar
Almeida, Hermione, Romantic medicine and John Keats, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard D., Paintings from books: art and literature in Britain, 1760–1900, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Amarasinghe, Upali, Dryden and Pope in the early nineteenth century, Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Amrine, Frederick, Zucker, Francis J. and Wheeler, Harvey (eds.), Goethe and the sciences: a reappraisal, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Wilda C., Between the library and the laboratory: the language of chemistry in eighteenth-century France, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Anon, ., ‘The living poets of England. Mrs Hemans’, The literary magnet 4 (March 1826), pp. 113–21.Google Scholar
Anon, ., ‘The poetry of Miss Landon’, The literary magnet n.s. 1 (January 1827).Google Scholar
Ansel, Michael, ‘Auf dem Weg zur Verwissenschaftlichung der Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: Heines Abhandlung Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland und Die romantische Schule’, Internationales Archiv för Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur 17.2 (1992)Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, ‘The media of sublimity: Johnson and Lamb on King Lear’, Studies in Romanticism 26 (1987), pp. 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, ‘Hamlet, Little Dorrit, and the history of character’, South Atlantic quarterly 87.2 (Spring 1988), pp. 311–28.Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, Critical genealogies: historical situations for postmodern literary studies, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Arden, Reed (ed.), Romanticism and language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy, Desire and domestic fiction: a political history of the novel, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Isobel, ‘The gush of the feminine: how can we read women's poetry of the Romantic period?’ in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Arnim, Bettina, Die Günderode, in Schmitz, Walter and Steinsdorff, Sibylle (eds.), Werke und Briefe, 4 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1986, I: 295–746.Google Scholar
Arnim, Bettina, Goethes Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde, in Schmitz, Walter and Steinsdorff, Sibylle (eds.), Werke und Briefe, vol. II, Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1992, 4 vols. (trans. Goethe's correspondence with a child, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1868).Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew, The poems of Wordsworth, London: Macmillan, 1879.Google Scholar
Ashfield, Andrew and Bolla, Peter (eds.), The sublime: a reader in eighteenthcentury British aesthetic theory, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, Rosemary, The German idea: four English writers and the reception of German thought, 1800–1860, Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Aske, Martin, ‘Critical disfigurings; the “jealous leer malign” in Romantic criticism’, in Questioning Romanticism, Beer, John (ed.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, Peculiar language, London: Methuen, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ault, Donald, Visionary physics: Blake's response to Newton, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane, Jane Austen's letters to her sister Cassandra and others, Chapman, R. W. (ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane, Persuasion, Spacks, Patricia Ann Meyer (ed.), New York: Norton, 1995.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane, Northanger Abbey, Grogan, Claire (ed.), Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Baer, Marc, Theatre and disorder in late Georgian London, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahti, Timothy, ‘Fate in the past: Peter Szondi's reading of German Romantic genre theory’, Boundary 2 11 (1983), pp. 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, Joanna, ‘Preface’ to A series of plays, 1798, rpt. London: Routledge, 1996: 1–72.Google Scholar
Baillie, Joanna, ‘Introductory discourse’, A series of plays, 1798, rpt. London: Routledge, 1996, I: 1–72.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich, The dialogic imagination, Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (trans.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris, The social mission of English criticism, 1848–1932., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Balzac, Honoré, Preface to La comédie humaine, , Marcel Bouteron (ed.), vol. I, Paris: Gallimard, 1950–6, pp. 3–16 (trans. Marriage, Ellen, The works of Honoré de Balzac, vol. I, Philadelphia, PA: Avil, 1901, pp. liii–lxix).Google Scholar
Balzac, Honoré, ‘A study of M. Beyle’, in The charterhouse of Parma by Stendhal, , 2 vols., Moncrieff, C. K. Scott (trans.), New York: Boni & Liveright, 1925, 1: vii–lxxiii.Google Scholar
Banks, Brenda, ‘Rhetorical missiles and double-talk: Napoleon, Wordsworth, and the invasion scare of 1804’, in Romanticism, radicalism, and the press, Behrendt, Stephen C. (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1997, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Laetitia (ed.), ‘On the origin and progress of novel-writing’, in The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810, 1: 1–62.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia, The works of Anna Lætitia Barbauld, with a memoir by Lucy Aikin, 2 vols., London: Longman, 1825.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia, The poems of Anna Letitia Barbauld, McCarthy, William and Kraft, Elizabeth (eds.), Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia, ‘On the pleasure derived from objects of terror, with Sir Bertrand, a fragment’, Gamer, Michael (ed.), http://www.english.upenn.edu/˜mgamer/Romantic/ barbauldessays.html.
Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), Poetical works of Mr. William Collins, London: Cadell and Davies, 1802.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The correspondence of Samuel Richardson, London: Richard Phillips, 1804.Google Scholar
Barbauld, Anna Letitia (ed.), The British novelists, 50 vols., London: Rivington, 1810.Google Scholar
Barfield, Owen, Saving the appearances: a study in idolatry, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Barilli, Renato, Rhetoric, Menozzi, Giuliana (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Barrell, John, English literature in history, 1730–80: an equal, wide survey, London: Hutchinson, 1983.Google Scholar
Barrell, John, The political theory of painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt: ‘the body of the public’, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Barrell, John, The birth of Pandora and the division of knowledge, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.Google Scholar
Barry, Kevin, Language, music, and the sign: a study in aesthetics, poetics and poetic practice from Collins to Coleridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, Protestant theology in the nineteenth century: its background & history, Valley Forge, PA: Judson Press, 1973. Translation based on 2nd rev. German edn, Zurich: Zollikon, 1952.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, ‘The old rhetoric: an aide-memoire’, in The semiotic challenge, Howard, Richard (trans.), New York: Hill and Wang, 1988, pp. 11–94.Google Scholar
Barzun, Jacques, Classic, Romantic, and Modern, New York: Doubleday, 1961.Google Scholar
Bate, Walter J., From Classic to Romantic: premises of taste in eighteenth century England, New York: Harper, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, Walter J. (ed.), Criticism: the major texts, New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1970.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan (ed.), The Romantics on Shakespeare, London: Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, Shakespeare and the English Romantic imagination, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, Shakespearean constitutions: politics, theatre, criticism, 1730–1830, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bate, Walter Jackson, John Keats, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Bator, Paul G., ‘Rhetoric and the novel in the eighteenth-century British university curriculum’, Eighteenth-century studies 30 (1996–7), pp. 173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles, Baudelaire as a literary critic: selected essays, Hyslop, Lois Boe and Hyslop, Francis E. Jr (trans.), University Park, pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles, Oeuvres complètes, Pichois, Claude (ed.), 2 vols., Paris: Gallimard, 1976, vol. II.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles, La Fanfarlo, Boyd, Greg (trans.), Lappin, Kendall E. (ed.), Berkeley: Donald S. Ellis, 1986.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles, Oeuvres complètes, Dantec, Yves-Gérard (ed.), Paris: Gallimard, 1951.Google Scholar
Bauer, Matthias, Romantheorie, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumer, Konstanze, Bettina, Psyche, Mignon: Bettina von Arnim und Goethe, Stuttgart: Heinz, 1986.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, ‘German philosophy’, in The encyclopedia of philosophy, Edwards, Paul (ed.), 8 vols., New York: Macmillan, 1967, vol. III, pp. 291–309.Google Scholar
Becker, Eva D., Der deutsche Roman um 1780, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, Thomas O., The ideology of genre: a comparative study of generic instability, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beer, John B., Coleridge, the visionary, London: Chatto & Windus, 1959.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘The origins of Romantic literary theory’, Colloquia Germanica 2 (1968), pp. 109–26.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘The impact of Classical antiquity on the formation of the Romantic literary theory of the Schlegel brothers’, in Classical models in literature, Konstantinovic, Zoran, , Warren Anderson and Dietze, Walter (eds.), (Proceedings of the ixth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association), Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck, 1981, pp. 139–43.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Problems of origin in literary history’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, Perkins, David (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Studien zur Romantik und zur idealistischen Philosophie, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1988.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Unendliche Perfektibilität: europäische Romantik und französische Revolution, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Frühromantik, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behler, Ernst and Hörisch, Jochen, Die Aktualität der Frühromantik, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1987.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Die Auffassung der Revolution in der deutschen Frühromantik’, in Essays on European literature in honor of Liselotte Dieckmann, Hohendahl, Peter Uwe, Lindenberger, Herbert and Schwarz, Egon (eds.), St Louis, MO: Washington University Press, 1972, pp. 191–215.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Französische Revolution und Antikekult’, in Europäische Romantik i, Mandelkow, Karl Robert (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft 14, Wiesbaden: Athenaion, 1982, pp. 83–112.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Unendliche Perfektibilität: europäische Romantik und französische Revolution, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Irony and the discourse of Modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, German Romantic literary theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behler, Ernst, and Hörisch, Jochen, Die Aktualität der Frühromantik, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Klassische Ironie, romantische Ironie, tragische Ironie: zum Ursprung dieser Begriffe, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.Google Scholar
Behler, Diana, The theory of the novel in early German Romanticism, Berne: Peter Lang, 1978.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Goethes Wilhelm Meister und die Romantheorie der Frühromantik’, Etudes germaniques 44 (1989), pp. 409–28.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, German Romantic literary theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behler, Ernst, Irony and the discourse of modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Die Poesie in der frühromantischen Theorie der Brüder Schlegel’, in Behler, Ernst (ed.), Athenäum: Jahrbuch für Romantik (1991), pp. 13–40.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Problems of origin in modern literary history’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, Perkins, David (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst, ‘Concepts of literary history in the comparative literary history of the Schlegel brothers’, in Comparative literary history as discourse: in honor of Anna Balakian, Valdés, Mario J., Javitch, Daniel and Aldridge, A. Owen (eds.), Bern: Peter Lang, 1992, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Behrendt, Stephen C., ‘Questioning the Romantic novel’, Studies in the novel 26 (1994), pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Behrendt, Stephen C., Shelley and his audiences, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Behrendt, Stephen, ‘Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the woman writer's fate’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., The fate of reason: German philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (ed. and trans.), The early political writings of the German Romantics, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C., Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: the genesis of modern German political thought, 1790–1820, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Michael Davitt, The development of American romance: the sacrifice of relation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Bender, John, and Wellbery, David E. (eds.), The ends of rhetoric: history - theory - practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations, Arendt, Hannah (ed.), Zohn, Harry (trans.), New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, The concept of criticism in German Romanticism, in Selected writings, vol. I: 1913–26, Bullock, Marcus Paul and Jennings, Michael W. (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1996, pp. 116–200.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, Der Begriff der Kunstkritik in der deutschen Romantik, in Gesammelte Schriften, Tiedemann, Rolf and Schweppenhäuser, Hermann (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974, vol. I, pp. 7–122.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, ‘The storyteller: reflections on the work of Nikolai Leskov’, in Illuminations, Arendt, Hannah (ed.), Zohn, Harry (trans.), New York: Schocken, 1969, pp. 83–109.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, ‘The storyteller: reflections on the work of Nikolai Leskov’, The origin of German tragic drama, Osborne, John (trans.), London: Verso, 1992.Google Scholar
Berghahn, Klaus L., ‘From Classicist to Classical literary criticism, 1730–1806’, Blazer, John R. (trans.), in Hohendahl, Peter Uwe (ed.), A history of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988, pp. 13–98.Google Scholar
Berman, Antoine, The experience of the foreign: culture and translation in Romantic Germany, Heyvaert, S. (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, August Ferdinand, Anfangsgründe der Sprachwissenschaft, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1990.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, August Ferdinand, Sprachlehre, 2 vols., 2nd edn, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973.Google Scholar
Besser, Gretchen R., Germaine de Staël revisited, New York: Twayne, 1994.Google Scholar
Bhéguin, Albert, L'ame romantique et le rêve: essai sur le romantisme allemand et la poésie française, Paris: Corti, 1946.Google Scholar
Bialostosky, Don H. and Needham, Lawrence D. (eds.), Rhetorical traditions and British Romantic literature, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bialostosky, Don H., Wordsworth, dialogics, and the practice of criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bietak, Wilhelm, Romantische Wissenschaft, Deutsche Literatur, ser. 17, vol. 13, Leipzig: Reclam, 1940.Google Scholar
Bishop, Lloyd, Romantic irony in French literature: from Diderot to Beckett, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Black, Max, Models and metaphors: studies in language and philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Blackall, Eric A., Goethe and the novel, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, 1783, rpt. Philadelphia: Troutman & Hayes, 1853.Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, London: W. Tegg, 1879.Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, vol. III, New York: Garland, 1970, 3 vols.Google Scholar
Blake, William, The poetry and prose of William Blake, Erdman, David V. (ed.), Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar
Blake, William, The complete poetry and prose of William Blake, rev. edn, Erdman, David V. and Bloom, Harold (eds.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Blake, William, Poetry and prose, Keynes, Geoffrey (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Blake, William, The poetry and prose of William Blake, Erdman, David V. (ed.), Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar
Blanckenburg, Friedrich, Versuch über den Roman, Lämmert, Eberhard (ed.), Stuttgart: Metzler, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blin, Georges, Stendhal et les problèmes du roman, Paris: Corti, 1990.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, Kabbalah and criticism, New York: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, ‘The internalization of quest romance’, The Yale review 58 (1969), pp. 526–36.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, The visionary company: a reading of English Romantic poetry, rev. edn, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961; 1971.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, Introduction, Mary Shelley, New York: Chelsea House, 1985, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, et al. (eds.), Deconstruction and criticism, New York: Seabury, 1979.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans, ‘Anthropologische Annäherung an die Aktualität der Rhetorik’, in Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben, Stuttgart: Reclam, 1981, pp. 104–36.Google Scholar
Böckmann, Paul, ‘Der Roman der Transzendentalpoesie in der Romantik’, in Geschichte, Deutung, Kritik: Literaturwissenschaftliche Beiträge dargebracht zum 65. Geburtstag Werner Kohlschmidts, Bindschedler, Maria and Zinsli, Paul (eds.), Bern: Francke, 1969, pp. 165–85.Google Scholar
Bohler, Michael, ‘Naturwissenschaft und Dichtung bei Goethe’, in Wittkowski, Wolfgang (ed.), Goethe im Kontext: Kunst und Humanität, Naturwissenschaft und Politik von der Aufklärung bis zur Restauration, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1984, pp. 313–35.Google Scholar
Bohls, Elizabeth, Women travel writers and the language of aesthetics, 1716–1818, Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhme, Jakob, Sämmtliche Werke, Schiebler, K. W. (ed.), 7 vols., Leipzig: Barth, 1922.Google Scholar
Bolla, Peter, The discourse of the sublime: readings in history, aesthetics and the subject, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas P., ‘Electric affinities: Arnim and Schellings Naturphilosophie’, Euphorion 81 (1987), pp. 217–39.Google Scholar
Bono, James J., ‘Science, discourse, and literature: the role/rule of metaphor in science’, in Literature and science: theory and practice, Peterfreund, Stuart (ed.), Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1990, pp. 59–89.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne, A rhetoric of irony, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Bosse, Heinrich, ‘The marvellous and Romantic semiotics’, Studies in Romanticism 14 (1975), pp. 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosse, Heinrich, ‘“Dichter kann man nicht bilden”: zur Veränderung der Schulrhetorik nach 1770’, Jahrbuch für internationale Germanistik 2 (1976), pp. 81–125.Google Scholar
Boulger, James D., Coleridge as religious thinker, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, René, L'ironie romantique: spectacle et jeu de Mme de Staël à Gérard de Nerval, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1974.Google Scholar
Bovenschen, Silvia, Die imaginierte Weiblichkeit: exemplarische Untersuchungen zu kulturgeschichtlichen und literarischen Präsentationsformen des Weiblichen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979.Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew, Aesthetics and subjectivity: from Kant to Nietzsche, Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C., ‘Hegel's theory of tragedy’, in Oxford lectures on poetry, London: Macmillan, 1909, pp. 69–95.Google Scholar
Braider, Christopher, Refiguring the real: picture and modernity in word and image, 1400–1700, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Brantner, Christina E., ‘Frühromantische Frauengestalten in Dorothea Veits Roman Florentin (1801)’, Michigan Germanic studies 17 (1991), pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Brewer, Daniel, ‘Political culture and literary history: La Harpe's Lycée’, Modern language quarterly 58 (1997), pp. 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromwich, David, Hazlitt: the mind of a critic, Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David, ‘Romantic poetry and the Edinburgh ordinances’, Yearbook of English studies 19 (1989), 1–16.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter, The melodramatic imagination: Balzac, Henry James, melodrama, and the mode of excess, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth, ‘Irony as a principle of structure’, in Critical theory since Plato, Adams, Hazard (ed.), New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971, pp. 968–74.Google Scholar
Brown, Huntington, The Classical tradition in English literature: a bibliography, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Brown, Marshall, The shape of German romanticism, Ithaca, NY: Crnell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Brown, Marshall, ‘Romanticism and enlightenment’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Marshall, The shape of German Romanticism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Brown, Jane K.The theatrical mission of the Lehrjahre’, Goethe's narrative fiction: the Irvine Goethe symposium, Lillyman, William J. (ed.), Berlin: de Gruyter, 1983, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
Brown, Marshall, ‘The logic of realism: a Hegelian approach’, PMLA 96 (1981), pp. 224–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chandos Michael, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft, or, the female illuminati: the campaign against women and “modern philosophy” in the early republic’, Journal of the early republic 15 (1995), pp. 389–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nathaniel, Sexuality and feminism in Shelley, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Barry S., ‘Sturm und Drang and the Romantic period in music’, Studies in Romanticism 9 (1970), pp. 269–84.Google Scholar
Brown, Marshall, Turning points: essays in the history of cultural expressions, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bruns, Gerald L., Modern poetry and the idea of language, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Bruns, , ‘Wordsworth at the limits of romantic hermeneutics’, The centennial review 33 (1989), pp. 393–418.Google Scholar
Bryson, Norman, Word and image: French painting of the Ancien Régime, Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bubner, RÜdiger (ed.), Das älteste Systemprogramm: Studien zur FrÜhgeschichte des deutschen Idealismus (Hegel-Studien, suppl. no. 9), Bonn: Bouvier, 1973.Google Scholar
Bull, Malcolm (ed.), Apocalypse theory and the ends of the world, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, A philosophical inquiry into the origins of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful, Boulton, James T. (ed.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, O'Brien, Conor Cruise (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth, The rhetoric of religion: a study in logology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Burney, Fanny, Diary and letters of Madame d'Arblay, Barrett, Charlotte (ed.), 7 vols., London: Henry Colburn.
Burroughs, Catherine B., Closet stages: Joanna Baillie and the theater theory of British Romantic women writers, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burwick, Frederick, ‘Elektrizität und Optik: zu den Beziehungen zwischen wissenschaftlichen und literarischen Schriften Achim von Arnims’, Aurora 46 (1986), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Burwick, Frederick, The damnation of Newton: Goethe's color theory and Romantic perception, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burwick, Frederick (ed.), Approaches to organic form: permutations in science and culture, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Douglas, ‘Wordsworth and the classics’, University of Toronto quarterly 2 (1933), pp. 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Douglas, Mythology and the Romantic tradition in English poetry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937.Google Scholar
Bush, Douglas, Science and English poetry: a historical sketch, 1590–1950, New York: Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Butler, E. M., The tyranny of Greece over Germany: a study of the influence exercised by Greek art and poetry over the great German writers of the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Cambridge University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background, 1760–1830., New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn (ed.), Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution controversy, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Jane Austen and the war of ideas, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background 1760–1830, Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, rebels, and reactionaries: English literature and its background, 1760–1830, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, ‘Culture's medium: the role of the review’, in Curran, Stuart (ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygrave, Stephen, ‘Land of the giants: gaps, limits and audiences in Coleridge's Biographia literaria’, in Beyond Romanticism: new approaches to texts and contexts, 1780–1832, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 32–52.Google Scholar
Byron, George Gordon Lord, Poetical works, McGann, Jerome J. (ed.), 7 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–93.Google Scholar
Byron, George Gordon Lord, The complete works, McGann, Jerome J. (ed.), 7 vols., Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Cambridge history of the Bible, vol. III: The West, from the Reformation to the present day, Greenslade, S. L. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1963, 3 vols.Google Scholar
Campbell, Thomas, Specimens of the British poets: with biographical and critical notices, and an essay on English poetry, 7 vols., London: John Murray, 1819.Google Scholar
Campbell, Thomas, ‘An essay on English poetry’, in Specimens of the British poets: with biographical and critical notices, and an essay on English poetry, London: John Murray, 1819.Google Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger, Affekt und Ausdruck: zur Umwandlung der literarischen Rede im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger, ‘Die zwei Perioden des Stils’, Comparatio 2 (1991), pp. 73–99.Google Scholar
Cantor, Paul A., Creature and creator: myth-making and English Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., In the theatre of Romanticism: Coleridge, nationalism, women, Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., ‘Forever young: Master Betty and the queer stage of youth in English Romanticism’, in Pfau, Thomas and Kercsmar, Rhonda Ray (eds.), Rhetorical and cultural dissolution in Romanticism, Special Issue, South Atlantic quarterly 95 (1996), pp. 575–602.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, On heroes, hero-worship and the heroical in history, Goldberg, Michael K. (ed.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and miscellaneous essays, Traill, Henry DuC (ed.), London: Chapman & Hall, 1899.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, On heroes, hero-worship and the heroic in history, New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and miscellaneous essays, Traill, H. D. (ed.), 5 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Carus, Carl Gustav, Psyche: zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Seele, Pforzheim: Flammer und Hoffmann, 1846.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, The philosophy of the Enlightenment, Koelln, Fritz C. A. and Pettegrove, James P., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Castex, Pierre-Georges, Baudelaire critique d'art, Paris: Sedes, 1969.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard, Art of judgement, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard, A Kant dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Robert, History of the English language and literature, 4th edn, Edinburgh: Chambers 1837.Google Scholar
Chandler, James K., Wordsworth's second nature: a study of the poetry and politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Chandler, James K., ‘Representative men, spirits of the age, and other Romantic types’, in Johnston, Kenneth R. et al. (eds.), Romantic revolutions: criticism and theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990, pp. 104–32.Google Scholar
Chapple, Gerald, Hall, Frederick and Schulte, Hans (eds.), The Romantic tradition: German literature and music in the nineteenth century, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992.Google Scholar
Charity, A. C., Events and their afterlife: the dialectics of Christian typology in the Bible and Dante, Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Chase, Cynthia, Decomposing figures: rhetorical readings in the Romantic tradition, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Chateaubriand, François-René, Génie du christianisme, ou, beautés de la religion chrétienne, Paris: Migneret, 1802 (trans. Shoberl, Frederic, The beauties of Christianity, Philadelphia, pa: Carey, 1815).Google Scholar
Chateaubriand, François-René, Le Génie du christianisme, ou, beautés de la religion chrétienne, Paris: Migneret, 1802 (trans. Shoberl, Frederic, The beauties of Christianity, Philadelphia, PA: Carey, 1815).Google Scholar
Chateaubriand, François-René, The genius of Christianity: or, the spirit and beauty of the Christian religion, White, Charles I. (trans.), New York: Fertig, 1976.Google Scholar
Christensen, Jerome, Coleridge's blessed machine of language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Christensen, Jerome, Practicing enlightenment: Hume and the formation of a literary career, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Christensen, Jerome, Lord Byron's strength: Romantic writing and commercial society, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Clark, Kenneth, The gothic revival: an essay in the history of taste, 3rd edn, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1962.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ted, and Guyer, Paul (eds.), Essays in Kant's aesthetics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Cohen, Paula M., ‘Jane Austen's rejection of Rousseau: a novelistic and feminist initiation’, Papers on language and literature 30 (1994), pp. 215–34.Google Scholar
Cole, Lucinda, ‘(Anti)feminist sympathies: the politics of relationship in Smith, Wollstonecraft, and More’, ELH 58 (1991), pp. 107–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, Watson, George (ed.), New York: Everyman, 1971.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, ‘On the principles of genial criticism’, in Biographia literaria, edited with his aesthetical essays, Shawcross, John (ed.), 2 vols., OxfordUniversity Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Lay sermons, White, Reginald James (ed.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
ColeridgeTaylor, Samuel, The notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Collected letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Griggs, E. L. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1956–71.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. V: Lectures 1808–19 on literature, Foakes, R. H. (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987, 16 vols.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Poetical works, Coleridge, E. H. (ed.), 2 vols., Oxford University Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 5 vols., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957–.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 16 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, On the constitution of the church and state according to the idea of each, Barrell, John (ed.), London: Dent & Sons, 1972.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, ‘Confessions of an inquiring spirit’, in Collected works, vol. 1XI: Shorter works and fragments, Jackson, J. R. J. and Jackson, H. T. (eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 1111–71.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, Shawcross, J. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1907.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The note books of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 3 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia literaria, or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions, Engell, James and Bate, Walter Jackson (eds.), 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. V: Lectures 1808–1819 on literature, Foakes, R. A. (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987, 16 vols.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Coleridge's criticism of Shakespeare, Foakes, R. A. (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., ‘The mysteries of Udolpho, by Radcliffe, Ann’, The critical review 24 (August 1794), pp. 361–72.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., ‘The Italian, by Radcliffe, Ann’, The critical review 28 (June 1798), pp. 166–9.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., ‘Hubert de Sevrac, by Robinson, Mary’, The critical review 28 (August 1798).Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., The complete poetical works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coleridge, Ernest Harley (ed.), 2 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., The notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coburn, Kathleen (ed.), 3 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., The friend, Rooke, Barbara E. (ed.), 2 vols., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., Table-talk, Woodring, Carl (ed.), 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T., Http://www.english.upenn.edu/˜mgamer/Romantic/coleridge.reviews, Gamer, Michael (ed.).
Coleridge, Samuel T., Letters from England 1813–1844, Colvin, Christina (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Comstock, Cathy, ‘“Transcendental buffoonery”: irony as process in Schlegel's “Über die Unverständlichkeit”’, Studies in Romanticism, 26 (1987), pp. 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corngold, Stanley, ‘Nietzsche's moods’, Studies in Romanticism 29 (1990), pp. 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Robert, Devolving English literature, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Crawford, John M., Romantic criticism of Shakespearian drama, Salzburg: Institut für Englische Sprache und Literatur, Universität Salzburg, 1978.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the sciences, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart (ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, T. H., ‘Schleiermacher: true interpreter’, in The interpretation of belief: Coleridge, Schleiermacher and Romanticism, Jasper, David (ed.), London: Macmillan, 19861986, pp. 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, Stuart, Poetic form and British Romanticism, Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Curran, StuartRomantic poetry: the I altered’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 185–207.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, Carl, Esthetics of music, Austin, William W. (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Damrosch, Leopold Jr, ‘God and man’, in Symbol and truth in Blake's myth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980, pp. 244–301.Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph, The critical mythology of irony, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Darwin, Erasmus, The loves of the plants, 1789, facsim., Oxford: Woodstock, 1991.Google Scholar
Daverio, John, ‘Schumann's systems of musical fragments and Witz’, in Nineteenth-century music and the German Romantic ideology, New York: Schirmer Books, 1993, pp. 49–88.Google Scholar
Daverio, John, ‘Schumann's systems of musical fragments and Witz’, in Nineteenth-century music and the German Romantic ideology, New York: Schirmer Books, 1993, pp. 49–88.Google Scholar
Davidson, Cathy N., The revolution of the word: the rise of the novel in America, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dawson, P. M. S., ‘Poetry in an age of revolution’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993pp. 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Paz, Alfredo, Europa romantica: fondamenti e paradigmi della sensibilità moderna, Naples: Liguori, 1994.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas, The collected writings of Thomas de Quincey, new edn, Masson, David (ed.), 14 vols., Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, 1889–90.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas, The collected writings of Thomas De Quincey, new edn, Masson, David (ed.), 14 vols., Edinburgh: Black, 1889–90.Google Scholar
Deane, Seamus, The French Revolution and Enlightenment in England, 1789–1832, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJean, Joan, ‘Portrait of the artist as Sappho’, in Gutwirth, Goldberger and Szmurlo, (eds.), Germaine de Staël, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991, pp. 122–37.Google Scholar
Delacroix, Eugène, The journal of Eugène Delacroix, Pach, Walter (trans.), New York: Crown, 1948.Google Scholar
Delacroix, Eugène, Journal de Eugène Delacroix, Joubin, André (ed.), 2 vols., Paris: Plon, 1932 (trans. Pach, Walter, The journal of Eugène Delacroix, New York: Crown, 1948).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Of grammatology, Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (trans.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, ‘James Marsh and American philosophy’, Journal of the history of ideas, 2 (1941), pp. 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Hondt, Jacques, ‘Lumières et romantisme: le choc de la révolution’, Bulletin de la société américaine de philosophie de langue française 2 (1990–91)pp. 115–26.Google Scholar
Dierkes, Hans, Literaturgeschichte als Kritik: Untersuchungen zu Theorie und Praxis von Friedrich Schlegels frühromantischer Geschichtsschreibung, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1980.Google Scholar
Dierkes, Hans, ‘Ironie und System: Friedrich Schlegels “Philosophische Lehrjahre” (1797–1799)’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 97 (1990)pp. 251–76.Google Scholar
Dierkes, Hans, Literaturgeschichte als Kritik: Untersuchungen zu Theorie und Praxis von Friedrich Schlegels fröhromantischer Literaturgeschichtsschreibung, Studien zur deutschen Literatur 63, Töbingen: Niemeyer, 1980.Google Scholar
Dirk, Delabastita and D'hulst, Lievan (eds.), European Shakespeares: translating Shakespeare in the Romantic age, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993.Google Scholar
D'Israeli, Isaac, Curiosities of literature: consisting of anecdotes, characters, sketches and observations, literary, critical and historical, London: Murray, 1791.Google Scholar
Dockhorn, Klaus, Macht und Wirkung der Rhetorik, Bad Homburg, Berlin and Zurich: Gehlen, 1968.Google Scholar
Donohue, Joseph W. Jr, Dramatic character in the English Romantic age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Du Bos, Jean-Baptiste, Critical reflections on poetry, painting, and music, New York: AMS Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Dunlop, John Colin, History of prose fiction, Wilson, Henry (ed.), new edn, New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Dunlop, John Colin, History of prose fiction: a new edition revised with notes, appendices and index, Wilson, Henry (ed.), new edn, 2 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Dupuis, C. F., Origines de tous les cultes, ou religion universelle, 12 vols., Paris: 1791.Google Scholar
Dyson, A. E., The crazy fabric: essays in irony, London: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, The function of criticism, London: Verso, 1984.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, The ideology of the aesthetic, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry, The ideology of the aesthetic, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Eaves, Morris, William Blake's theory of art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Eaves, Morris, The counter-arts conspiracy: art and industry in the age of Blake, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Eaves, Morris, ‘The sister arts in British Romanticism’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 236–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, Maria, Letters for literary ladies, London: Johnson, 1795.Google Scholar
Eichendorff, Joseph, Der deutsche Roman des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts in seinem Verhältniß zum Christentum, in Sämtliche Werke des Freiherrn Joseph von Eichendorff, Historisch-Kritische Ausgabe, Mauser, Wolfram (ed.), 18 vols., Regensburg: Josef Habbel, 1965, VIII: 5–245.Google Scholar
Eichner, Hans, ‘The rise of modern science and the genesis of Romanticism,’ PMLA 97 (1982), pp. 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitner, Lorenz (ed.), Neoclassicism and Romanticism, 1750–1850: sources and documents, 2 vols., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
Elistratova, A. and Rona, E., ‘Romantic writers and the Classical literary heritage’, in European Romanticism, Soter, I., Neupokoyeva, I. and Rona, E. (eds.), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1977, pp. 91–126.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, Henri F., The discovery of the unconscious: the history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry, New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Ellison, Julie, Delicate subjects: Romanticism, gender, and the ethics of understanding, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo, Representative men, in Essays and lectures, New York: Viking Press, 1983, pp. 611–761.Google Scholar
Emmersleben, August, Die Antike in der romantischen Theorie: die Gebrüder Schlegel und die Antike, Berlin: Ebering, 1937.Google Scholar
Engell, James, Forming the critical mind: Dryden to Coleridge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Engell, James, The creative imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelsing, Rolf, Analphabetentum und Lektüre: zur Sozialgeschichte des Lesens in Deutschland zwischen feudaler und industrieller Gesellschaft, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1973.Google Scholar
Erdman, David V., Blake, prophet against empire: a poet's interpretation of the history of his own times, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Erskine-Hill, Howard, The Augustan idea in English literature, London: Arnold, 1983.Google Scholar
Erskine-Hill, Howard, Poetry of opposition and revolution: Dryden to Wordsworth, Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubanks, Kevin, ‘Minerva's veil: Hemans, critics, and the construction of gender’, European Romantic review 8 (1997), pp. 341–59.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A., ‘Telling tales about genre: poetry in the Romantic novel’, Studies in the novel 26 (1994), pp. 153–72.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A., ‘A woman writes the fiction of science: the body in Frankenstein’, Genders 14 (1992), pp. 50–65.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A., Romantic correspondence: women, politics, and the fiction of letters, Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Feldman, Paula R. and Kelley, Theresa M. (eds.), Romantic women writers: voices and countervoices, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira, Subject to others: British women writers and colonial slavery, 1670–1834, New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira, ‘Janet Little and Robert Burns: the politics of the heart’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 207–22.Google Scholar
Fermon, Nicole, Domesticating passions: Rousseau, woman, and the nation, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1997.Google Scholar
Ferris, Ina, The achievement of literary authority: gender, history, and the Waverley novels, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fetzer, John Francis, ‘Romantic irony’, in European Romanticism: literary cross-currents, modes, and models, Hoffmeister, Gerhart (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1990, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig, The essence of Christianity, Eliot, George (trans.), New York: Harper, 1957.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Addresses to the German nation, Kelly, George Armstrong (ed.), New York & Evanston, IL: Harper & Row, 1968.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, ‘Von der Sprachfähigkeit und dem Ursprung der Sprache’, in Gesamtausgabe I, vol. III: Werke 1794–1796, Lauth, Reinhard and Jacob, Hans (eds.), Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1966, pp. 97–127 (trans. Surber, Jere Paul, Language and German idealism: Fichte's linguistic philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, The characteristics of the present age, in Smith, William (trans.), Popular works of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, London: Trübner, 1889, II: 1–288.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Fichte: early philosophical writings, Breazeale, Daniel (ed. and trans.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Fielding, Joseph, Joseph Andrews, Battestin, Martin C. (ed.), The Wesleyan edition of the works of Henry Fielding, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Fielding, Joseph, The history of Tom Jones, Bowers, Fredson (ed.), Oxford: Wesleyan University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Fiesel, Eva, Die Sprachphilosophie der deutschen Romantik, Tübingen: Mohr, 1927; rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973.Google Scholar
Fink, Gonthier-Louis, ‘Die Revolution als Herausforderung in Literatur und Publizistik’, in Zwischen Revolution und Restauration: Klassik, Romantik 1786–1815, Deutsche Literatur: eine Sozialgeschichte 5, Glaser, Horst Albert (ed.), Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1980, pp. 110–29.Google Scholar
Fink, Gonthier-Louis (ed.), Les romantiques allemands et la révolution française, Strasbourg: Université des sciences humaines de Strasbourg, 1989.Google Scholar
Fink, Karl J., Goethe's history of science, Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Finlay, Marike, The Romantic irony of semiotics: Friedrich Schlegel and the crisis of representation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishelov, David, Metaphors of genre: the role of analogies in genre theory, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Flagg, John S., ‘Shelley and Aristotle: elements of the Poetics in Shelley's theory of poetry’, Studies in Romanticism 9 (1970), pp. 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Gloria, Opera in the development of German critical thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Flitter, Derek, Spanish Romantic literary theory and criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Flitter, Derek, Spanish Romantic literary theory and criticism, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Foerster, Donald M., Homer in English criticism: the historical approach in the eighteenth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Women critics, 1660–1820: an anthology, Folger, Collective on Early Women Critics (ed.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Fontanier, Pierre, Les figures du discours, Paris: Flammarion, 1968.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia, Signs, science and politics: philosophies of language in Europe 1700–1830, Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fort, Bernadette (ed.), Fictions of the French Revolution, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Foscolo, Ugo, Ugo Foscolo's ‘Ultime lettere di Jacopo Ortis’: a translation, RadcliC-Umstead, Douglas (trans.), Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Foster, Gretchen M. (ed.), Pope versus Dryden: a controversy in letters to the Gentleman's magazine 1789–91, Victoria, BC: English Literary Studies, 1989.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair, Kinds of literature: an introduction to the theory of genres and modes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fraiman, Susan, ‘Jane Austen and Edward Said: gender, culture, and imperialism’, Critical inquiry 21 (1995), pp. 805–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Manfred, ‘Philosophische Grundlagen der Frühromantik’, Athenäum 4 (1994), pp. 37–130.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, ‘Philosophische Grundlagen der Frühromantik’, Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik: Vorlesungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, ‘The infinite text’, Glyph: textual studies, vol. VII, Weber, Samuel (ed.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980, pp. 70–101.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred, Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik: Vorlesungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
Franklin, Caroline, ‘“At once above – beneath her sex”: the heroine in Regency verse romance’, Modern language review 84 (1989), pp. 273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Caroline, ‘“Quiet cruising o'er the ocean woman”: Byron's Don Juan and the woman question’, Studies in Romanticism 29 (1990), pp. 603–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, Elke P. and Goodman, Katherine R. (eds.), Bettina Brentano von Arnim: gender and politics, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Fredricks, Nancy, ‘On the sublime and beautiful in Shelley's Frankenstein’, Essays in literature 23 (1996), pp. 178–89.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans W., The eclipse of Biblical narrative: a study in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century hermeneutics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Strachey, James (trans.), London: The Hogarth Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael, Absorption and theatricality: painting and beholder in the age of Diderot, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, ‘Caroline Schlegel-Schelling: “a good woman, and no heroine”’, in Goodman, Katherine R. and Waldstein, Edith (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus: German women writers around 1800, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, The androgyne in German Romanticism: Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis and the metaphysics of love, New York: Lang, 1983.Google Scholar
Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, ‘Caroline Schlegel-Schelling: “a good woman and no heroine”’, in Goodman, and Waldstein, (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop, A study of English Romanticism, Brighton: Harvester Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop, Fearful symmetry: a study of William Blake, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop, The great code: the Bible and literature, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop, ‘Poetry and design in William Blake’, in Blake: a collection of critical essays, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966, pp. 119–26.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop, The stubborn structure: essays on criticism and society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Furet, François, Interpreting the French Revolution, Forster, Elborg (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona (eds.), A critical dictionary of the French Revolution, Goldhammer, Arthur (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, Edmund Burke's aesthetic ideology: language, gender, and political economy in revolution, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, Tom, ‘Nasty tricks and tropes: sexuality and language in Mary Wollstonecraft's Rights of woman’, Studies in Romanticism 32 (1993), pp. 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furst, Lilian R., Romanticism in perspective: a comparative study of the aspects of the Romantic movements in England, France and Germany, London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Furst, Lilian R., Fictions of romantic irony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Furst, Lilian R., ‘Shakespeare and the formation of Romantic drama in Germany and France’, in Gillespie, Gerald (ed.), Romantic drama, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Furst, Lilian, The contours of European Romanticism, London: Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and method, New York: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg, Truth and method, Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G. (trans.), 2nd edn, New York: Crossroad, 1988.Google Scholar
Galperin, William H., The return of the visible in British Romanticism, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Garber, Frederick, ‘Nature and the Romantic mind: egotism, empathy, irony’, Comparative literature 29 (1977), pp. 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Frederick (ed.), Romantic irony, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Frederick, Self, text, and romantic irony: the example of Byron, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Frederick (ed.), Romantic irony, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe, ‘Überlegungen zum Begriff der Hypotypose bei Kant’, in Hart Nibbrig, Christiaan L. (ed.), Was heißt ‘Darstellen’?Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994, pp. 152–74.Google Scholar
Geißler, Rolf (ed.), Romantheorie in der Aufklärung: Thesen und Texte zum Roman des 18. Jahrhunderts in Frankreich, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard, The architext: an introduction, Lewin, Jane E. (ed.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Genlis, Stéphanie-Félicité Comtesse, ‘Le femme auteur’, Nouveaux contes moraux et nouvelles historiques, 3 vols., Paris: Maradin, 1802, III: 51–150.Google Scholar
Genlis, Stéphanie-Félicité Comtesse, De l'influence des femmes sur la littérature française, Paris: Lecointe et Durey, 1826.Google Scholar
Gervinus, Georg Gottfried, Geschichte der poetischen National-Literatur der Deutschen, 5 vols., Leipzig: Engelmann, 1835–42.Google Scholar
Gervinus, Georg Gottfried, ‘Prinzipien einer deutschen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung’, in Literaturwissenschaft und Literaturgeschichte: ein Lesebuch zur Fachgeschichte der Germanistik, Cramer, Thomas and Wenzel, Horst (eds.), Munich: Fink, 1975, pp. 19–64.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward, An essay on the study of literature, New York: Garland, 1970.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward, The decline and fall of the Roman Empire, Womersley, David (ed.), London: Penguin Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Gide, André, Introduction, in Hogg, James, The private memoirs and confessions of a justified sinner, London: Cresset, 1947, pp. ix–xv.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Gerald (ed.), Romantic drama, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles Coulston, Genesis and geology: a study in the relations of scientific thought, natural theology, and social opinion in Great Britain, 1790–1850, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Print politics: the press and radical opposition in early nineteenthcentury England, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gipper, Helmut, ‘Sprachphilosophie in der Romantik’, in Sprachphilosophie: ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössicher Forschung, Dascal, Marcelo et al. (eds.), Berlin: de Gruyter 1992, I: 197–233.Google Scholar
Gipper, Helmut and Schmitter, Peter, Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachphilosophie im Zeitalter der Romantik, Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar
Giuliano, Cheryl Fallon, ‘Gulnare/Kaled's “untold” feminization of Byron's Oriental tales’, Studies in English literature, 1500–1900 33 (1993), pp. 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleckner, Robert F. and Enscoe, Gerald (eds.), Romanticism: points of view, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google Scholar
Gode, Alexander, Natural science in German Romanticism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Godwin, William, Caleb Williams, McCracken, David (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Godwin, William, ‘Of choice in reading’, in The enquirer: reflections on education, manners, and literature in a series of essays, New York: Kelley, 1965, pp. 129–46.Google Scholar
Godwin, William, ‘Of history and romance’, in Things as they are; or, the adventures of Caleb Williams, Hindle, Maurice (ed.), London: Penguin, 1988.Google Scholar
Godwin, William, ‘Of history and romance’, rpt. as ‘Essay on history and romance’, in Political and philosophical writings of William Godwin, Philp, Mark (ed.), 7 vols., London: William Pickering, 1993, VII: 290–301.Google Scholar
Godwin, William, The enquirer: reflections on education, manners, and literature, London: Robinson, 1797.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, ‘On German architecture’, in Essays on art and literature, Gearey, John (ed.), Ellen, and Nordhoff, Ernest (trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, The sorrows of young Werther. The new Melusina. Novelle, Lange, Victor (trans.), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft, Leopoldina-Ausgabe, Gunther Schmid (ed.), Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1947–.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Goethe's color theory, Aach, Herb (ed. and trans.), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Scientific studies, Miller, Douglas (ed. and trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1988.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Sämtliche Werke nach Epochen seines Schaffens, Richter, Karl (ed.), 21 vols., Munich: Hanser, 1985–96.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Goethe's botanical writings, Mueller, Bertha (trans.), Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Elective affinities: a novel, Constantine, David (ed. and trans.), Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre (Gesamtausgabe der Werke und Schriften in zweiundzwanzig Bänden), 22 vols., Stuttgart: Cotta, 1940–1963, VII: 9–708 (trans. Blackall, Eric A., Wilhelm Meister's apprenticeship, New York: Suhrkamp, 1989).Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Wilhelm Meister's apprenticeship, Blackall, Eric A. (ed. and trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, ‘Shakespeare: a tribute’, in Essays on art and literature, Gearey, John (ed.), Nardroff, Ellen and Nardroff, Ernest H. (trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 163–5.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfang, Faust, Arndt, Walter (trans.), New York: Norton, 1976.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfang, Plays, Passage, Charles W. (trans.), New York: Frederick Ungar, 1980.Google Scholar
Goldberg, M. A., The poetics of Romanticism: toward a reading of John Keats, Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Oliver, Collected works of Oliver Goldsmith, Friedman, Arthur (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966, 5 vols.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena, The republic of letters: a cultural history of the French Enlightenment, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Goodman, Katherine R. and Waldstein, Edith (eds.), ‘Introduction’, In the shadow of Olympus: German women writers around 1800, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Goslee, Nancy, ‘Witch or pawn: women in Scott's narrative poetry’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar
Grabo, Carl Henry, A Newton among poets: Shelley's use of science in ‘Prometheus Unbound’, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Graver, Bruce, ‘Wordsworth's georgic beginnings’, Texas studies in literature and language 33 (1991), pp. 137–59.Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta, Shakespeare verbatim: the reproduction of authenticity and the 1790 apparatus, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Susan C., ‘“Abroad and at home”: sexual ambiguity, miscegenation, and colonial boundaries in Edgeworth's Belinda’, PMLA 112 (1997), pp. 214–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Thomas S., ‘Metaphorical modes in nineteenth-century music criticism: image, narrative, and idea’, in Music and text: critical inquiries, Scher, Steven Paul (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Thomas S., Wagner's musical prose: texts and contexts, Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Thomas S., ‘Tableaux vivants: landscape, history painting, and the visual imagination in Mendelssohn's orchestral music’, Nineteenth-century music 31 (1997), pp. 38–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, John, The rise and fall of the man of letters: aspects of English literary life since 1800, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969.Google Scholar
Gubar, Susan, ‘Feminist misogyny: Mary Wollstonecraft and the paradox of “it takes one to know one”’, Feminist studies 20 (1994), pp. 453–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, Claudio, Literature as system: essays toward the theory of literary history, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Guillory, John, Cultural capital: the problem of literary canon formation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundolf, Friedrich, Shakespeare und der deutsche Geist, Berlin: Bondi, 1911.Google Scholar
Gusdorf, Georges, Fondements du savoir romantique, Paris: Payot, 1982.Google Scholar
Gutwirth, Madelyn, Madame de Staël, novelist: the emergence of the artist as woman, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Gutwirth, Madelyn, The twilight of the goddesses: women and representation in the French Revolutionary era, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Gutwirth, Madelyn, Goldberger, Avriel and Szmurlo, Karyna (eds.), Germaine de Staël: crossing the borders, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant and the claims of taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant, Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Burger, Thomas (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Habicht, Werner, ‘Romanticism, antiromanticism, and the German Shakespeare tradition’, in Kishi, Tetsuo, Pringle, Roger, Wells, Stanley (eds.), Shakespeare and cultural traditions, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1994, pp. 243–52.Google Scholar
Hagstrum, Jean H., The sister arts: the tradition of literary pictorialism and English poetry from Dryden to Gray, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Hagstrum, Jean H., William Blake, poet and painter: an introduction to the illuminated verse, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Hall, Jason Y., ‘Gall's phrenology; a Romantic psychology’, Studies in Romanticism 16 (1977), pp. 305–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallam, Henry, Introduction to the literature of Europe in the fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Paris: Baudry, 1839.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Käte, The logic of literature, Rose, Marilynn J. (trans.), 2nd edn, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Paul, ‘Romantic irony and English literary history’, in The Romantic heritage: a collection of critical essays, Engelberg, Karsten (ed.), Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, 1983, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Paul, Coleridge's poetics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Cyrus, ‘The Temporality of selfhood: metaphor and Romantic poetry’, New Literary History 6 (1974), pp. 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Cyrus, ‘Platonic dialogue and romantic irony: prolegomenon to a theory of Romantic narrative’, Canadian review of comparative literature 3 (1976)pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Cyrus, ‘The origins of a philosophical genre theory in German Romanticism’, European Romantic review 5 (1994), pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handwerk, Gary, Irony and ethics in narrative: from Schlegel to Lacan, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Handwerk, Gary, ‘Of Caleb's guilt and Godwin's truth: ideology and ethics in Caleb Williams’, ELH 60 (1993), pp. 939–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Keith and Selden, Ray (eds.), Revolution and English Romanticism: politics and rhetoric, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.Google Scholar
Harding, Anthony J.Felicia Hemans and the effacement of woman’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 138–49.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. F. C., The second coming: popular millenarianism, 1780–1850, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey H., Wordsworth's poetry, 1787–1815, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey, Wordsworth's poetry, 1787–1814, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey H., Beyond formalism: literary essays 1958–1970, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey H., The fate of reading and other essays, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Heinrich, Lord Byrons Stellung zu den Klassizisten seiner Zeit, Bottrop: Postberg, 1932.Google Scholar
Havens, Raymond Dexter, The influence of Milton on English poetry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1922.Google Scholar
Hayden, John O., Polestar of the ancients: the Aristotelian tradition in Classical and English literary criticism, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hays, Mary, Female biography; or memoirs of illustrious and celebrated women, of all ages and countries, London: Phillips, 1803.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., 1930–4, rpt. New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, Selected writings, Cook, Jon (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘Lectures on the English comic writers’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, VI: 1–168.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘Sir Walter Scott, Racine, and Shakespear’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, XII: 336–46.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘The spirit of the age; or contemporary portraits’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, XI: 1–184.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘The Waverley notes’, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967, XX: 231–3.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘Shakespeare and Milton’, in Lectures on the English poets and the English comic writers, Hazlitt, William Carew (ed.), London: Bell, 1894.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, ‘Shakespeare and Milton’, Characters of Shakespeare's plays, London: Oxford University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, Lectures on the English poets, in The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., London: J. M. Dent, 1930–34, V: 1–168.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William, The complete works of William Hazlitt, Howe, P. P. (ed.), 21 vols., New York: AMS Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hedge, Frederic Henry, ‘Classic and Romantic’, Atlantic monthly 57 (1886), pp. 309–16.Google Scholar
Heffernan, James A. W., The re-creation of landscape: a study of Wordsworth, Coleridge, Constable, and Turner, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1985.Google Scholar
Heffernan, James A. W., Museum of words: the poetics of ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Aesthetics: lectures on fine art, Knox, T. M. (trans.), 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Lectures on the philosophy of history, Sibree, J. (trans.), New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Lectures on the philosophy of religion, Speirs, E. B. and Sanderson, J. Burdon (trans.), 3 vols., London: Kegan Paul, 1895.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Early theological writings, Knox, T. M. (trans.), Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Aesthetics: lectures on fine art, Knox, T. M. (trans.), 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Phenomenology of spirit, Miller, A. V. (trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Aesthetics: lectures on fine art, Knox, T. M. (trans.), vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich, The Romantic school and other essays, Hermand, Jost and Holub, Robert C. (eds.), The German library 33, New York: Continuum, 1985.Google Scholar
Helfer, Martha B., ‘Dorothea Veit-Schlegel's Florentin: constructing a feminist Romantic aesthetic’, German quarterly 69 (1996), pp. 144–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemans, Felicia, Records of woman, Reiman, Donald H. (ed.), 1828, rpt. New York: Garland, 1978.Google Scholar
Hemans, Felicia, ‘Scenes and passages from the “Tasso” of Goethe’, New monthly magazine and literary journal n.s. 3 (1834), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Henderson, Andrea, ‘Passion and fashion in Joanna Baillie's “Introductory discourse”’, PMLA 112 (1997), pp. 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, ‘Beauty and freedom: Schiller's struggle with Kant's aesthetics’, in Essays in Kant's aesthetics, Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (eds.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. 237–57.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, The course of remembrance and other essays on Hölderlin, Förster, Eckart (ed.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Reflections on the philosophy of the history of mankind, 1784–91, Manuel, Frank E. (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Sämmtliche Werke, Suphan, Bernhard Ludwig (ed.), 33 vols., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967–8.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, The spirit of Hebrew poetry, Marsh, James (trans.), Burlington, VT: E. Smith, 1833; rpt. Napierville, IL: Aleph Press, 1971. (Earlier trans.: Dialogues, containing the conversation of Eugenius and Alciphron on the spirit and beauties of the sacred poetry of the Hebrews, London: Cadell, T. Jr., and Davies, W., 1801.)Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, God: some conversations, Burkhardt, Frederick H. (ed.), New York: Veritas Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Reflections on the philosophy of the history of mankind, 1800, Churchill, T. O. (trans.), Manuel, Frank E. (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache, in Herders sämmtliche Werke, Suphan, Bernard (ed.), Berlin: Weidmann, 1891, V: 1–154 (trans. (abridged) Moran, John H. and Gode, Alexander, in On the origin of language: two essays by Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Johann Gottfried Herder, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986, pp. 87–166)Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Sämmtliche Werke, Suphan, Bernhard (ed.), Berlin: Weidmann, 1877–1913.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Selected early works, 1764–1767: addresses, essays, and drafts; fragments on recent German literature, , Ernest A. Menze and Menges, Karl (eds.), Menze, Ernest A. and Palma, Michael (trans.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Sämmtliche Werke, Suphan, Bernhard Ludwig (ed.), 33 vols., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967–8.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, ‘Die kritischen Wälder’, Werke, 10 vols., vol. II: Schriften zur Ästhetik und Literatur: 1767–1781, Grimm, Gunter E. (ed.), Bibliothek deutscher Klassiker 95, Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993, pp. 9–442.Google Scholar
Heussler, Alexander, Klassik und Klassizismus in der deutschen Literatur: Studie über zwei literarhistorische Begriffe, Bern: Haupt, 1952.Google Scholar
Heyck, T[homas] W[illiam], The transformation of intellectual life in Victorian England, London: Croom Helm, 1982.Google Scholar
Highet, Gilbert, The Classical tradition: Greek and Roman influences on Western literature, New York: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Hill, Alan G., ‘Wordsworth's “Grand Design” ’, Proceedings of the British Academy 72 (1986), pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D., Wordsworth and Schelling: a typological study of Romanticism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Hitchener, Elizabeth, The weald of Sussex, London: Barlow, 1821.Google Scholar
Hitchener, Elizabeth, Letters of Elizabeth Hitchener to Percy Bysshe Shelley, Philadelphia, PA: West, 1926.Google Scholar
Hodgson, John A., Coleridge, Shelley, and transcendental inquiry: rhetoric, argument, metapsychology, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, E. T. A., Werke, Ellinger, Georg (ed.), 15 vols., Berlin: Deutsches Verlagshaus Bong, 1900.Google Scholar
Hofkosh, Sonia, ‘Sexual politics and literary history: William Hazlitt's Keswick escapade and Sarah Hazlitt's Journal’, in Favret, Mary A. and Watson, Nicola J. (eds.), At the limits of Romanticism: essays in cultural, feminist, and materialist criticism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994, pp. 125–42.Google Scholar
Hogg, James, The private memoirs and confessions of a justified sinner, Carey, John (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Hogle, Jerrold E., Shelley's process: radical transference and the development of his major works, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter (ed.), A history of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hohoff, Curt, ‘Lucinde und die Theorie der Liebe’, in Schnittpunkte: gesammelte Aufsätze, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1963, pp. 123–32.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich, Sämtliche Werke, Große Stuttgarter Ausgabe, Beißner, Friedrich (ed.), Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1943–85.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich, Essays and letters on theory, Pfau, Thomas (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret, Women writers and poetic identity: Dorothy Wordsworth, Emily Brontë, and Emily Dickinson, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret, ‘Keats reading women, women reading Keats’, Studies in Romanticism 29 (1990), pp. 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hort, Fenton John Anthony, ‘Coleridge’, Cambridge essays, vol. II, Cambridge: Parker, 1856.Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel, Traité de l'origine des romans, 1670, rpt. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1966 (trans. Atreatise of romances and their original, London: Battersby, 1672).Google Scholar
Hugo, Victor, Preface to Cromwell, Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1968.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm, Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluβ auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts, in Gesammelte Schriften, Leitzmann, Albert (ed.), vol. VII, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1968, 17 vols. (trans. Heath, Peter, On language: the diversity of human language structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind, Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Hume, David, Essays moral, political and literary, Miller, Eugene F. (ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Liberty, 1985.Google Scholar
Hume, David, ‘Of miracles’, in Enquiries concerning the human understanding and concerning the principles of morals, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975, pp. 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, Dialogues concerning natural religion; and, The natural history of religion, Gaskin, J. C. A. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn, Politics, culture and class in the French Revolution, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hunt, Leigh, Leigh Hunt's literary criticism, Houtchens, Lawrence Huston and Houtchens, Carolyn Washburn (eds.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Hurd, Richard, Letters on chivalry and romance, 1762, rpt. New York: Garland, 1971.Google Scholar
Hurd, Richard, Letters on chivalry and romance, with the third Elizabethan dialogue, Morley, Edith J. (ed.), London: Frowde, 1911.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, Raymond, ‘The subjectivity or objectivity of Friedrich Schlegel's poetic irony’, Germanic review 26 (1951), pp. 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immerwahr, Raymond, ‘Romantic irony and romantic arabesque prior to Romanticism’, German quarterly 42 (1969), pp. 665–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inchbald, Elizabeth Simpson, The British theatre, 25 vols., London: Longman, 1808.Google Scholar
Izenberg, Gerald N., Impossible individuality: Romanticism, revolution, and the origins of modern selfhood, 1787–1802, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobus, Mary, ‘The art of managing books’, in Reed, Arden (ed.), Romanticism and language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984, pp. 215–46.Google Scholar
Jacobus, Mary, Romanticism and sexual difference: essays on ‘The prelude’, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Anna, Characteristics of women, moral, poetical, and historical, 2nd edn, New York: Wiley and Putnam, 1847.Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, Vladimir, L'ironie, ou la bonne conscience, Paris: Alcan, 1936.Google Scholar
Jauß, H. R. (ed.), Nachahmung und Illusion (Kolloquium Gießen Juni 1963), Munich: Eidos, 1964.Google Scholar
Jeanrond, Werner G., ‘The impact of Schleiermacher's hermeneutics on contemporary interpretation theory’, in The interpretation of belief: Coleridge, Schleiermacher and romanticism, Jasper, David (ed.), London: Macmillan, 1986, pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis, Contributions to the Edinburgh Review, Boston: J. C. Derby, 1854.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis, Contributions to The Edinburgh review, The modern British essayists 6, Philadelphia, PA: Hart, 1853.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis, Contributions to the ‘Edinburgh review’, London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1854.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis, ‘“Records of woman” and “The forest sanctuary” by Felicia Hemans’, Edinburgh review 50 (October 1829), pp. 32–47Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis, Contributions to the ‘Edinburgh review’, 3 vols., London: Longman Borown, Green & Longmans, 1846.Google Scholar
Jewsbury, Maria Jane, Phantasmagoria, 2 vols., London: Hurst, 1825.Google Scholar
Jewsbury, Maria Jane, The history of an enthusiast, in The three histories, London: Westley, 1830.Google Scholar
Jewsbury, Maria Jane, Occasional papers, Gillett, Eric W. (ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, Wimsatt, W. K. Jr (ed.), New York: Hill and Wang, 1960.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, The Yale edition of the works of Samuel Johnson, Bate, W. J. et al. (eds.), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958–, 20 vols.Google Scholar
Kahler, Erich, ‘The nature of the symbol’, in Symbolism in religion and literature, May, Rollo (ed.), New York: Braziller, 1960, pp. 50–74.Google Scholar
Kálmán, Győrgy C., ‘Romantic irony as an international phenomenon’, Neohelicon 18 (1991), pp. 289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kames, Henry Home, Lord, , Elements of criticism, 1785, 2 vols., rpt. New York: Garland, 1978.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The critique of judgement, Meredith, James Creed (trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Gesammelte Schriften, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1910–83.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysical foundations of natural science, Ellington, James (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Lectures on metaphysics, Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve (eds. and trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of judgment, 1790, Bernard, J. H. (trans.), New York, 1951.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Foundations of the metaphysics of morals; and What is Enlightenment?, Beck, Lewis White (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1959.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Religion within the limits of reason alone, Greene, Theodore M. and Hudson, Hoyt H. (trans.), New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The critique of pure reason, Smith, Norman Kemp (trans.), New York: Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The critique of practical reason, Beck, Lewis White (trans.), New York: Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge University Press, 1992–.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The metaphysics of morals, Gregor, Mary (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of judgment, Barnard, J. H. (trans.), New York: Hafner, 1966.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der Urteilskraft, Werkausgabe, vol. x, Weischedel, Wilhelm (ed.), Frankfurt am/Main: Suhrkamp, 1974.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of judgment, Pluhar, Werner S. (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Perpetual peace, and other essays on politics, history, and morals, Humphrey, Ted (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of judgment, Pluhar, Werner S. (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kapitza, Peter, Die frühromantische Theorie der Mischung: über den Zusammenhang von romantischer Dichtungstheorie und zeitgenössischer Chemie, Munich: Hueber, 1968.Google Scholar
Kapitza, Peter, ‘Theorie der Mischung und Universalpoesie’, Die frühromantische Theorie der Mischung: über den Zusammenhang von romantischer Dichtungstheorie und zeitgenössischer Chemie, Munich: Hueber, 1968, pp. 157–84.Google Scholar
Keats, John, The poems of John Keats, Stillinger, Jack (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Keats, John, The letters of John Keats: 1814–1821, Rollins, Hyder Edward (ed.), vol. I, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Kelley, Theresa M., Reinventing allegory, Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, English fiction of the Romantic period 1789–1830, London: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, ‘The limits of genre and the institution of literature: Romanticism between fact and fiction’, in Romantic revolutions: criticism and theory, Johnston, Kenneth R., Chaitin, Gilbert, Hanson, Karen and Marks, Herbert (eds.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990, pp. 158–75.Google Scholar
Kelsall, Malcolm, ‘The slave-woman in the harem’, Studies in Romanticism 31 (1992), pp. 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Either/Or, Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H. (eds. And trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, The concept of dread, Lowrie, Walter (trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, The concept of irony, Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H. (eds. and trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Fear and trembling, Lowrie, Walter (trans.), London: Everyman's Library, 1994.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Papers and journals: a selection, Hannay, Alastair (trans.), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, The concept of irony, with constant reference to Socrates, Capel, Lee M. (trans.), New York: Harper, 1965.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, The concept of irony, Capel, Lee M. (trans.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
King-Hele, Desmond, Erasmus Darwin and the Romantic poets, London: Macmillan, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnaird, John, William Hazlitt, critic of power, New York: Columbia University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kipperman, Mark, ‘Fichtean irony and some principles of Romantic quest’, Studies in Romanticism 23, (1984), pp. 223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klancher, Jon, ‘Romantic criticism and the meanings of the French Revolution’, Studies in Romanticism 28 (1989), pp. 463–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klancher, Jon, ‘Godwin and the republican romance: genre, politics, and contingency in cultural history’, Modern language quarterly 56 (1995), pp. 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klancher, Jon P., The making of English reading audiences, 1790–1832, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Knight, D. M., ‘The physical sciences and the Romantic movement’, History of science 9 (1970), pp. 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, Norman, The word ‘irony’ and its context (1500–1755), Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Kohlenbach, Margarete, ‘Women and artists: E. T. A. Hoffmann's implicit critique of early Romanticism’, Modern language review 89 (1994), pp. 659–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Denise, ‘Reading Emma as a lesson on “ladyhood”: a study in the domestic “Bildungsroman”’, Essays in literature 22 (1995), pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Körner, Josef, Romantiker und Klassiker: die Brüder Schlegel in ihren Beziehungen zu Schiller und Goethe, Berlin: Askanischer Verlag, 1924.Google Scholar
Körner, Josef, ‘Friedrich Schlegels “Philosophie der Philologie”’, Logos 17 (1928), 1–72.Google Scholar
Kramer, Lawrence, Music and poetry, the nineteenth century and after, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Karl, Romantic landscape vision: Constable and Wordsworth, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Karl, British romantic art, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kuzniar, Alice, ‘Hearing woman's voices in Heinrich von Ofterdingen’, PMLA 107 (1992), pp. 1196–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzniar, Alice (ed.), Outing Goethe and his age, Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Jean-Luc, Nancy, L'absolu littéraire: théorie de la littérature du romantisme allemand, Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1978 (trans. Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, and Nancy, Jean-Luc, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in early German Romanticism, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Jean-Luc Nancy, , The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc, The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cherel (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors we live by, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lamb, Charles, ‘On the tragedies of Shakespeare, with reference to their fitness for stage representation’, in Complete works and letters, New York: Random House, 1935, pp. 289–303.Google Scholar
Lamennais, Félicité-Robert, Paroles d'un croyant, Paris: Rendeul, 1834 (trans. Words of a believer, London: Cousins, 1834).Google Scholar
Lämmert, Eberhard (ed.), Romantheorie 1620–1880: Dokumentation ihrer Geschichte in Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1988.Google Scholar
Landon, Letitia Elizabeth, The Venetian bracelet, London: Longman, 1829.Google Scholar
Landon, Letitia Elizabeth, Critical writings, Sypher, F. J. (ed.), Delmar, NY: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints, 1996.Google Scholar
Landon, Letitia Elizabeth, Letitia Elizabeth Landon: selected writings, McGann, Jerome J. and Riess, Daniel (eds.), Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Lang, Candace D., Irony/humor: critical paradigms, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Langbauer, LaurieAn early romance: motherhood and women's writing in Mary Wollstonecraft's novels’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 208–19.Google Scholar
Lange, Victor, ‘Friedrich Schlegel's literary criticism’, Comparative literature 7 (1955), pp. 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanson, Gustave, Histoire de la littérature française, remaniée et complétée pour la période 1850–1950, Tuffray, Paul (ed.), Paris: Hachette, 1952.Google Scholar
Larrabee, Stephen A., English bards and Grecian marbles: the relationship between sculpture and poetry, especially in the Romantic period, New York: Columbia University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Laubriet, Pierre, L'intelligence de l'art chez Balzac: d'une esthétique balzacienne, Paris: Didier, 1961.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich, Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft, 2 vols., Munich: Hueber, 1960.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Rachel Mordecai, The education of the heart: the correspondence of Rachel Mordecai Lazarus and Maria Edgeworth, MacDonald, Edgar E. (ed.), Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Leask, Nigel, The politics of imagination in Coleridge's critical thought, New York: St Martin's Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy, The strategy of life: teleology and mechanics in nineteenth-century German biology, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Theological writings: selections in translation, Chadwick, Henry (ed.), London: Adam and Charles Black, 1956.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Laocoön: an essay on the limits of painting and poetry, McCormick, Edward Allen (trans.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Leventhal, Robert S., The disciplines of interpretation: Lessing, Herder, Schlegel and hermeneutics in Germany, 1750–1800, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levere, Trevor Harvey, Poetry realized in nature: Samuel Taylor Coleridge and early nineteenth-century science, Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Harry, The broken column: a study in Romantic Hellenism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Levin, Susan M., Dorothy Wordsworth and Romanticism, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Levin, Susan M., ‘The gypsy is a jewess: Harriet Abrams and theatrical Romanticism’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 236–51.Google Scholar
Levine, George (ed.), Realism and representation: essays on the problem of realism in relation to science, literature and culture, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Levine, George L., The realistic imagination: English fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph M., The battle of the books: history and literature in the Augustan age, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
LeWinter, Oswald (ed.), Shakespeare in Europe, New York: Meridian Books, 1963.Google Scholar
Lindenberger, Herbert, Opera in history: from Monteverdi to Cage, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Linkin, Harriet Kramer, ‘Romanticism and Mary Tighe's Psyche: peering at the hem of her blue stockings’, Studies in Romanticism 35 (1996), pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszt, Franz, ‘Berlioz und seine Harold-Symphonie’, in Gesammelte Schriften, Ramann, Lina (ed.), 6 vols., Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, V.
Lockspeiser, Edward, Music and painting: a study in comparative ideas from Turner to Schoenberg, London: Cassell, 1973.Google Scholar
London, Beth, ‘Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the spectacle of masculinity’, PMLA 108 (1993), pp. 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, Roger (ed.), Introduction, Eighteenth-century women poets, Oxford University Press, 1990, pp. xxi–xlvii.Google Scholar
Lootens, Tricia, ‘Hemans and home: Victorianism, feminine “internal enemies”, and the domestication of national identity’, PMLA 109 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O., ‘On the meaning of “Romantic” in early German RomanticismMLN 31 (1916), pp. 385–96.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O., Essays in the history of ideas, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur, ‘On the discrimination of Romanticisms’, in English Romantic poets: modern essays in criticism, Abrams, M. H. (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 1960, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Low, Lisa and Harding, Anthony John (eds.), Milton, the Metaphysicals, and Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert, Isaiah: a new translation, London: Nichols, Dodsley, and Cadell, 1778.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert, Lectures on the sacred poetry of the Hebrews, 1749; Eng. trans. 1752; Latin: Praelectiones, London: Johnson, 1787.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg, ‘Richness, chaos and form: a dialogue concerning Laurence Sterne’, in Soul and form, Bostock, Anna (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1974, pp. 124–51.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg, ‘The ideology of modernism’, in The meaning of contemporary realism, John, and Mander, Necke (trans.), London: Merlin Press, 1962pp. 17–46.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg, ‘The ideology of modernism’, The theory of the novel: a historico–philosophical essay on the forms of great epic literature, Bostock, Anna (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg, The theory of the novel: a historico–philosophical essay on the forms of great epic literature, Bostock, Anna (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg, ‘Richness, chaos and form: a dialogue concerning Laurence Sterne’, in Bostock, Anna (trans.), Soul and form, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1974, pp. 124–51.Google Scholar
Luther, Susan, ‘A stranger minstrel: Coleridge's Mrs. Robinson’, Studies in Romanticism 33 (1994), pp. 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, Judson S., ‘Romantic psychology and the inner senses: Coleridge’, PMLA 81 (1966), pp. 246–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François, Lessons on the analytic of the sublime, Rottenberg, Elizabeth (trans.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
MacClintock, W. D., ‘The Romantic and the Classical in English literature’, The Chautauquan 14 (1891), pp. 187–91.Google Scholar
Malraux, Clara, Rahel, ma grande soeur: un salon littéraire à Berlin au temps du romantisme, Paris: Ramsay, 1980.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, Aesthetic ideology, Warminski, Andrzej (ed.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, The rhetoric of Romanticism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, Allegories of reading, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, Blindness and insight, expanded edition, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, The rhetoric of Romanticism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘The rhetoric of temporality’, in Blindness and insight: essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism, Theory and History of Literature 7, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983, pp. 187–228.Google Scholar
Mandelkow, Karl Robert, ‘Kunst- und Literaturtheorie der Klassik und Romantik’, in Europäische Romantik I, Mandelkow, Karl Robert (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft 14, Wiesbaden: Athenaion, 1982, pp. 49–82.Google Scholar
Manning, Peter J., Byron and his fictions, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Manzoni, Alessandro, Scritti di teoria letteraria, Casanova, Adelaide Sozzi (ed.), Milan: Rizzoli, 1981.Google Scholar
Manzoni, Alessandro, On the historical novel, Bermann, Sandra (trans.), Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Marino, Adrian, ‘Literature and ideology in the republic of letters’, in Jost, François (ed.), Aesthetics and the literature of ideas: essays in honor of A. Owen Aldridge, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1990, pp. 214–24.Google Scholar
Marlinsky, Aleksandr, ‘On Romanticism and the novel’, in Russian Romantic criticism: an anthology, Leighton, Lauren Gray (ed. and trans.), New York: Greenwood Press, 1987, pp. 137–60.Google Scholar
Marsch, Edgar (ed.), Über Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: die historisierende Methode des 19. Jahrhunderts in Programm und Kritik, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1975.Google Scholar
Marso, Lori, (Un)manly citizens: the subversive feminine presence in J. J. Rousseau and Germaine de Staël, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Mathias, T[homas] J[ames], The pursuits of literature: a satirical poem in four dialogues, with notes, 12th edn, London: Becket, 1808.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F. O., American Renaissance: art and expression in the age of Emerson and Whitman, Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Maurer, Shawn Lisa, ‘The female (as) reader: sex, sensibility and the maternal in Wollstonecraft's fictions’, Essays in literature 19 (Spring 1992), pp. 36–54.Google Scholar
Mayo, Robert D., The English novel in the magazines, 1740–1815, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
McCarthy, William, ‘“We hoped the woman was going to appear”: repression, desire and gender in Anna Letitia Barbauld's early poems’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 113–37.Google Scholar
McCormick, Peter J., Modernity, aesthetics and the bounds of art, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
McFarland, Thomas, Coleridge and the pantheist tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
McFarland, Thomas, ‘Wordsworth on man, on nature, and on human life’, Studies in Romanticism 21 (1982), pp. 601–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, Thomas, ‘The Spinozist crescendo’, in Coleridge and the pantheist tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969, pp. 53–106.Google Scholar
McFarland, Thomas, ‘Coleridge's anxiety’, in Coleridge's variety: bicentenary studies, Beer, John (ed.), London: Macmillan, 1974, pp. 134–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, Thomas, Romanticism and the forms of ruin: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and modalities of fragmentation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome J., Social values and poetic acts: the historical judgment of literary work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome J., The poetics of sensibility: a revolution in literary style, Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. and Rattansi, P. M., ‘Newton and the pipes of Pan’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London 21 (1966), pp. 108–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Patricia, Public and private: gender, class, and the British novel (1764–1878), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
McKillop, Alan Dugald, English literature from Dryden to Burns, New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1948.Google Scholar
McKusick, James C., Coleridge's philosophy of language, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Mee, Jonathan, ‘Is there an antinomian in the house?: William Blake and the afterlife of a heresy’, in Historicizing Blake, Clarke, Steve and Worrall, David (eds.), London, New York: St Martin's Press, 1994, pp. 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meitinger, Serge, ‘Idéalisme et poétique’, Romantisme 14, no. 45, (1984), pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Horst, ‘Die frühe Romantische Dichtung in England: die Geburt einer Romantik aus dem Geiste der Revolution’, in Europäische Romantik ii, Heitmann, Klaus (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft 15, Wiesbaden: Athenaion, 1982.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., English Romantic irony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., ‘A criticism of their own: Romantic women literary critics’, in Questioning Romanticism, Beer, John (ed.), Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., Romanticism & gender, New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., ‘A criticism of their own: Romantic women literary critics’, in Beer, John (ed.), Questioning Romanticism, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., Mary Shelley: her life, her fiction, her monsters, New York: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., ‘Righting the wrongs of woman: Mary Wollstonecraft's Maria’, Nineteenthcentury contexts 19 (1996), pp. 413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., ‘Sex, violence, and slavery: Blake and Wollstonecraft’, Huntington Library quarterly 58 (1996), pp. 345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., ‘The female poet and the poetess: two traditions of British women's poetry, 1780–1830’, Studies in Romanticism 36 (1997), pp. 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Anne K. (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K. and Matlak, Richard E. (eds.), British literature, 1780–1830, Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace, 1996.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman, ‘Hawthorne and his mosses’, in Moby-Dick, Hayford, Harrison and Parker, Hershel (eds.), New York: Norton, 1967.Google Scholar
Menninghaus, Winfried, Unendliche Verdopplung: die frühromantische Grundlegung der Kunsttheorie im Begriff absoluter Selbstreflexion, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1987.Google Scholar
Miles, Josephine, The primary language of poetry in the 1740s and 1840s, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Autobiography, Robson, John M. (ed.), London: Penguin, 1989.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, On Bentham and Coleridge, Chatto & Windus, London: 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Essays on poetry, Sharpless, F. Parvin (ed.), Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Milton, John, The poems of John Milton, Darbishire, Helen (ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Miner, Earl (ed.), Literary uses of typology: from the late Middle Ages to the present, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. Thomas, Blake's composite art: a study of the illuminated poetry, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Mitford, Mary Russell, Narrative poems on the female character in the various relations of human life, London: Rivington, 1813.Google Scholar
Mitford, Mary Russell, The friendships of Mary Russell Mitford as recorded in letters from her literary correspondents, L'Estrange, A. G. (ed.), New York: Harper, 1882.Google Scholar
Modiano, Raimonda, Coleridge and the concept of nature, London: Macmillan, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modiano, Raimonda, Coleridge and the concept of nature, Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, Samuel H., The sublime: a study of the critical theories in eighteenthcentury England, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Monk, Samuel H., The sublime: a study in critical theories in eighteenth-century England, New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1935.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Marshall, Friedrich Hölderlin and the German neo-Hellenic movement, Oxford University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Moody, Jane, ‘“Fine word, legitimate!”: toward a theatrical history of Romanticism’, Texas studies in literature and language 38 (1996), pp. 223–44.Google Scholar
More, Hannah, Hints towards forming the character of a young princess, 2 vols., London: Cadell and Davies, 1805.Google Scholar
More, Hannah, Strictures on the modern system of female education, 1799, rpt. New York: Garland, 1974.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre, Le classicisme des romantiques, Paris: Librairie Plon, 1932.Google Scholar
Morgan, Sydney Owenson LadyMemoirs: autobiography, diaries and correspondence, London: Allen, 1862.Google Scholar
Morton, A. L., The everlasting gospel: a study in the sources of William Blake, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1958.Google Scholar
Moskal, Jeanne, ‘Gender, nationality, and textual authority in Lady Morgan's travel books’, in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 171–93.Google Scholar
Most, Glenn W., ‘Rhetorik und Hermeneutik: zur Konstitution der Neuzeitlichkeit’, Antike und Abendland 30 (1984), pp. 62–79.Google Scholar
Muecke, Douglas C., The compass of irony, London: Methuen, 1969.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt (ed.), The hermeneutics reader: texts of the German tradition from the Enlightenment to the present, New York: Continuum, 1994.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt, ‘Fichte und die romantische Sprachtheorie’ in Der transzendentale Gedanke: die gegenwärtige Darstellung der Philosophie Fichtes, Hammacher, Klaus (ed.), Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1981, pp. 442–59.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt, ‘From aesthetics to linguistics: Wilhelm von Humboldt and the Romantic idea of language’ in Le Groupe de Coppet: Actes et documents du deuxiéme Colloque de Coppet 10–13 juillet 1974, Geneva: Slatkine, 1977, pp. 195–215.Google Scholar
Muirhead, John H., Coleridge as philosopher, London: Macmillan, 1930.Google Scholar
Müller-Sievers, Helmut, Self-generation: biology, philosophy and literature around 1800, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Munsters, Wil, La poétique du pittoresque en France de 1700 à 1830, Geneva: Droz, 1991.Google Scholar
Murray, Hugh, The morality of fiction; or, an inquiry into the tendency of fictitious narratives, with observations on some of the most eminent, Norwood, PA: Norwood, 1977.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, ‘Sensibility and the “walk of reason”: Mary Wollstonecraft's literary reviews as cultural critique’, in Conger, Syndy McMillen (ed.), Sensibility in transformation: creative resistance to sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics, Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990, pp. 120–46.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc (ed.), Du sublime, Paris: Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
Naubert, Benedikte, ‘Sich rettend aus der kalten Würklichkeit’: die Briefe Benedikte Nauberts, Dorsch, Nikolaus (ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1986.Google Scholar
Neubauer, John, The emancipation of music from language: departure from mimesis in eighteenth-century aesthetics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Newlyn, Lucy, ‘Paradise lost’ and the Romantic reader, Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie H., ‘James Marsh and the Vermont transcendentalists’, Philosophical review 34 (1925), pp. 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie H., Mountain gloom and mountain glory: the development of the aesthetics of the infinite, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The birth of tragedy, in The birth of tragedy; and The genealogy of morals, Golffing, Francis (trans.), New York: Anchor Books, 1956pp. 1–146.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The birth of tragedy, Kaufmann, Walter (trans.), New York: Vintage, 1967.Google Scholar
Niggl, Gönter, ‘Die Anfänge der romantischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: Friedrich und August Wilhelm Schlegel’, in Die deutsche literarische Romantik und die Wissenschaften, Saul, Nicholas (ed.), Munich: Iudicium Verlag, 1991, pp. 265–81.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Hugh Barr (ed.), German aesthetic and literary criticism: Winkelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, Goethe, Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Hugh Barr (ed.), ‘The oldest system-program of German idealism’, in Friedrich Hölderlin: essays and letters on theory, Pfau, Thomas (trans. and ed.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1987, pp. 154–6.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Hugh Barr, Goethe and the scientific tradition, London: University of London, 1972.Google Scholar
Nitchie, Elizabeth, ‘Virgil and Romanticism’, Methodist review 113 (1930)pp. 859–67.Google Scholar
Notopoulos, James A., The Platonism of Shelley: a study of Platonism and the poetic mind, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Nottelmann-Feil, Mara, Ludwig Tiecks Rezeption der Antike: literarische Kritik und Reflexion griechischer und römischer Dichtung im theoretischen und poetischen Werk Tiecks, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, Kluckhohn, Paul and Samuel, Richard H. (eds.), 5 vols., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960–88.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Novalis Werke, Schulz, Gerhard (ed.), Munich: Beck, 1987.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, Kluckhohn, Paul and Samuel, Richard H. (eds.), vols. I–III, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 5 vols.
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, Kluckhohn, Paul and Samuel, Richard H. (eds.), 5 vols., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960–88.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Philosophical writings, Stoljar, Margaret Mahony (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, vol. II: Das philosophische Werk, Samuel, Richard H., Hans-Joachim Mähl, and Schulz, G. (eds.), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1965.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, Paul Kluckhohn and Richard Samuel in collaboration with Mähl, Hans-Joachim and Schulz, Gerhard (eds.), Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960–8.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, Kluckhohn, Paul and Samuel, Richard H. (eds.), 5 vols., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960–1988.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Philosophical writings, Stoljar, Margaret Mahony (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, vol. III: Das philosophische Werk II, Samuel, Richard H. (ed.), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968, 5 vols.Google Scholar
Nüsse, Heinrich, Die Sprachtheorie Friedrich Schlegels, Heidelberg: Winter, 1962.Google Scholar
Nuttall, A. D., A common sky: philosophy and the literary imagination, London: Chatto & Windus, 1974.Google Scholar
O'Brien, William Arctander, Novalis: signs of revolution, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
O'Brien, William Arctander, Novalis: signs of revolution, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Odell, George C. D., Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving, New York: Scribner's Sons, 1920.Google Scholar
Ormiston, Gayle L. and Schrift, Alan D. (eds.), The hermeneutic tradition: from Ast to Ricoeur, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Orsini, Gian N. G., Coleridge and German idealism: a study in the history of philosophy, Carbondale, IL and Edwardsville, IL: University of Southern Illinois Press, 1969.Google Scholar
OrsiniGiordano, G. N., Organic unity in ancient and later poetics: the philosophical foundations of literary criticism, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owenson, Sydney Lady Morgan, Memoirs: autobiography, diaries and correspondence, London: W. H. Allen, 1862.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona, Festivals and the French Revolution, Sheridan, Alan (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Paley, William, A view of the evidences of Christianity, London: Faulder, 1794.Google Scholar
Paley, William, Natural theology, Philadelphia, PA: Maxwell, 1802.Google Scholar
Paley, Morton D. (ed.), Twentieth-century interpretations of ‘Songs of innocence and experience’, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.Google Scholar
Paley, Morton D.Energy and the imagination: a study of the development of Blake's thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Paley, Morton D.The apocalyptic sublime, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Paley, Morton D.“These promised years”: Coleridge's “Religious musings” and the millenarianism of the 1790s’, in Revolution and English Romanticism: politics and rhetoric, Hanley, Keith and Selden, Raman (eds.), Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990, pp. 49–65.Google Scholar
Park, Roy, Hazlitt and the spirit of the age: abstraction and critical theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Park, Roy, ‘Ut pictura poesis': the nineteenth-century aftermath’, Journal of aesthetics and art criticism 28 (1969), pp. 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Mark, ‘Measure and counter-measure: the Lovejoy-Wellek debate and Romantic periodization’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, Perkins, David (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991, pp. 227–47.Google Scholar
Pascoe, Judith, Romantic theatricality: gender, poetry, and spectatorship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Paulin, Roger, ‘Die romantische Übersetzung: Theorie und Praxis’ in Die deutsche literarische Romantik und die Wissenschaften, Saul, Nicholas (ed.), Munich: Iudicium Verlag, 1991, pp. 250–64.Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald, Breaking and remaking: aesthetic practice in England 1700–1820, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald, Representations of revolution, 1789–1820., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald, Literary landscape: Turner and Constable, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Paz, Octavio, La otra voz: poesía y fin de siglo, Barcelona: Seix Barral, 1990 (trans. Lane, Helen, The other voice: essays on modern poetry, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1991).Google Scholar
Peacock, Thomas Love, The four ages of poetry, in Shelley, and Peacock, , ‘A defence of poetry’ and ‘The four ages of poetry’, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Peers, E. Allison, A history of the Romantic movement in Spain, 2 vols., New York: Hafner, 1964.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie, The futurist moment: avant-garde, avant guerre, and the language of rupture, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Pfau, Thomas, ‘Rhetoric and the existential: Romantic studies and the question of the subject’, Studies in Romanticism 26 (1987), pp. 487–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Thomas, Wordsworth's profession: form, class, and the logic of early Romantic cultural production, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Pfotenhauer, Helmut and Sprengel, Peter (eds.), Klassik und Klassizismus, Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Pfotenhauer, Helmut, Um 1800: Konfigurationen der Literatur, Kunstliteratur und Ästhetik, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piozzi, Hester, Autobiography, letters and literary remains of Mrs Piozzi, Hayward, A. (ed.), London: Longman, 1861.Google Scholar
Pipkin, James (ed.), English and German Romanticism: cross-currents and controversies, Heidelberg: Winter, 1985.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Edmund Burke and the redefinition of enthusiasm: the context as counter-revolution’, in The French Revolution and the creation of modern political culture, 4 vols., Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1987–89, vol. III: The transformation of political culture, 1789–1848, Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona (eds.), pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Poggi, Stefano and Maurizio, (eds.), Romanticism in science: science in Europe, 1790–1840, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polwhele, Richard, The unsex'd females: a poem, London: Cadell and Davies, 1798.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary, The proper lady and the woman writer: ideology and style in the works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Prang, Helmut, Die romantische Ironie, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.Google Scholar
Preisendanz, Wolfgang, Humor als dichterische Einbildungskraft: Studien zur Erzählkunst des poetischen Realismus, Munich: Fink, 1976.Google Scholar
Preisendanz, Wolfgang and Warning, Rainer (eds.), Das Komische, das Satirische, und das Ironische, Munich: Fink, 1976.Google Scholar
Prickett, Stephen, Romanticism and religion: the tradition of Wordsworth and Coleridge in the Victorian church, Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Prickett, Stephen, Origins of narrative: the Romantic appropriation of the Bible, Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proffitt, Edward, ‘Science and Romanticism’, The Georgia review 34 (1980), pp. 55–80.Google Scholar
Puppo, Mario, ‘Letteratura e scienza nell'età del romanticismo’, in Letteratura e scienza nella storia della cultura italiana: atti del IX congresso dell'Associazione internazionale per gli studi di lingua e letteratura italiana, 1976, Palermo: Manfredi, 1978, pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
Pushkin, Alexander, ‘On classical and romantic poetry’, in The critical prose of Alexander Pushkin, Proffer, Carl R. (ed. and trans.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1969, pp. 35–8.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Ann, ‘On the supernatural in poetry’, The new monthly magazine 16 (1826), pp. 145–52.Google Scholar
Rader, Ralph W., ‘The emergence of the novel in England: genre in history vs history of genre’, Narrative 1 (1993), pp. 69–83.Google Scholar
Rader, Ralph W., ‘From Richardson to Austen: “Johnson's rule” and the development of the eighteenth-century novel of moral action’, in Johnson and his age, Engell, James (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984, pp. 461–83.Google Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama, ‘Displacing post-structuralism: Romantic studies after Paul de Man’, Studies in Romanticism 24 (1985), pp. 451–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama and Wright, Julia M., ‘Introduction’, in Romanticism, history and the possibilities of genre: re-forming literature 1789–1837, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Reardon, Bernard M. G., Religion in the age of Romanticism: studies in early nineteenth-century thought, Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Arden (ed.), Romanticism and language, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Reeve, Clara, The progress of romance through times, countries, and manners, 1785, rpt. New York: Garland, 1970.Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J., The meaning of literature, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Joshua Sir, Discourses on art, Wark, Robert R. (ed.), San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1959.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, ‘Romanticism and colonization of the feminine’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Richter, Helene, ‘Byron: Klassizismus und Romantik’, Anglia 48 (1924), pp. 209–57.Google Scholar
Richter, Jean Paul Friedrich, Horn of Oberon: Jean Paul Richter's school for aesthetics, Hale, Margaret R. (trans.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Richter, Jean Paul Friedrich, Vorschule der Ästhetik, Miller, Norbert (ed.), Hamburg: Meiner, 1990 (trans. Hale, Margaret R., Horn of Oberon: Jean Paul Richter's school for aesthetics, Detroit, MI: Wayne University Press, 1973 pp. 179–95).Google Scholar
Richter, David H., The progress of romance: literary historiography and the gothic novel, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Richter, Jean Paul Friedrich, Vorschule der Ästhetik, in Werke, vol. v, Munich: Carl Hanser, 1963.Google Scholar
Rincé, Dominique, Baudelaire et la modernité poétique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1984.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mary, Sappho and Phaon, 1796, rpt. Delmar, NY: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints, 1995.Google Scholar
Robinson, Daniel, ‘Theodicy vs. feminist strategy in Mary Wollstonecraft's fiction’, Eighteenth-century fiction 9 (1997), pp. 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, Derek, Reviewing before the ‘Edinburgh’, 1788–1802, London: Methuen, 1978.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark, Authors and owners: the invention of copyright, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rosen, Charles, The Romantic generation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rosen, Charles, The Classical style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar
Rosen, Charles and Zerner, Henri, Romanticism and Realism: the mythology of nineteenth-century art, New York: Viking Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Rainer, Zehn Kapitel zur Geschichte der Germanistik: Literaturgeschichtsschreibung, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Robert, Transformations in late eighteenth-century art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Ross, Marlon B., The contours of masculine desire: Romanticism and the rise of women's poetry, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Roston, Murray, Prophet and poet: the Bible and the growth of Romanticism, London: Faber and Faber, 1965.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Julie, ou la nouvelle Héloise, in Oeuvres complètes, vol. II, Paris: Gallimard, 1961 (trans. Stewart, Philip and Vache, Jean, Julie, or the new Heloise, in The collected writings of Rousseau, vol. VI, Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher (eds.), Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1997).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, and Herder, Johann Gottfried, On the origin of language, Moran, John H. and Gode, Alexander (trans.), New York: Ungar, 1966.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John, Modern painters, 6 vols., London: George Allen, 1911.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Andrew (ed.), Byron: the critical heritage, New York: Barnes and Noble, 1970.Google Scholar
Rutter, Joachim, ‘Landschaft: zur Funktion des Ästhetischen in der modernen Gesellschaft’, in Subjektivität: sechs Aufsätze, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
Ryals, Clyde L., A world of possibilities: romantic irony in Victorian literature, Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sabin, Margery, English Romanticism and the French tradition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sade Marquis de, , Idée sur les romans, Glastier, Jean (ed.), Bordeaux: Ducros, 1970, (trans. Wainhouse, Austryn and Seaver, Richard, ‘Refiections on the novel’, in The Marquis de Sade: the 120 days of Sodom and other writings, New York: Grove Press, 1966, pp. 91–116).Google Scholar
Safran, Morri (ed.), ‘Women of the Romantic period’, http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/˜worp.
Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin, Chateaubriand et son groupe littéraire sous l'empire: cours professé a Liège en 1848–1849., Allem, Maurice (ed.), 2 vols., Paris: Garnier, 1948.Google Scholar
Sanders, Charles R., Coleridge and the Broad Church movement, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Sauer, Thomas G., A. W. Schlegel's Shakespearean criticism in England, 1811–1846, Bonn: Bouvier, 1981.Google Scholar
Saul, Nicholas (ed.), Die deutsche literarische Romantik und die Wissenschaften, Munich: Iudicium Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
Sayre, Robert, ‘The young Coleridge: Romantic utopianism and the French Revolution’, Studies in Romanticism 28 (1989), pp. 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Jean-Marie, La naissance de la littérature: la théorie esthétique du romantisme allemand, Paris: Presses de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, 1983.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Jean-Marie, ‘Romantisme et langage poétique’, Poétique 42 (1980), pp. 177–94.Google Scholar
Schanze, Helmut, Rhetorik: Beiträge zu ihrer Geschichte in Deutschland vom 16.–20. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt: Athenäum, 1974.Google Scholar
Schanze, Helmut (ed.), Friedrich Schlegel und die Kunsttheorie seiner Zeit, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar
Schaper, Eva, Studies in Kant's aesthetics, Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Schaper, Eva, ‘Taste, sublimity and genius: the aesthetics of nature and art’, in The Cambridge companion to Kant, Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 367–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, ‘On Dante in relation to philosophy’, and ‘The philosophy of art’, in Simpson, David (ed.), The origins of modern critical thought: German aesthetic and literary criticism from Lessing to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 232–47.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, ‘Concerning the relation of the plastic arts to nature’, Bullock, Michael (trans.), in The true voice of feeling: studies in English Romantic poetry, Read, Herbert (ed.), London: Faber and Faber, 1968pp. 323–58.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, System of transcendental idealism, Heath, Peter (ed.), Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, The philosophy of art, Stott, Douglas W. (ed. and trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, Sämmtliche Werke, Schelling, Karl Friedrich August (ed.), 14 vols., Stuttgart: Cotta, 1856–61.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, Of human freedom, Gutmann, James (trans. and ed.), Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing, 1936.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, The philosophy of art, Stott, Douglas W. (ed. and trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Schelling, Karoline, Caroline: Briefe aus der Frühromantik, Schmidt, Erich (ed.), 2 vols., Leipzig: Insel, 1913.Google Scholar
Schenk, Hans Georg Artur Viktor, The mind of the European Romantics: an essay in cultural history, London: Constable, 1966.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, On the aesthetic education of man, Snell, Reginald (trans.), New York: Ungar, 1965.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, On the aesthetic education of man, Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A. (ed. and trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, ‘On the use of the chorus in tragedy’, in The dramas of Friedrick von Schiller, Boylan, R. D. (trans.), London: Bell, 1920, pp. 517–23.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, ‘The stage as a moral institution’, Friedrich Schiller: an anthology for our time, New York: Ungar, 1959.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, On the aesthetic education of man, in a series of letters, Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A. (ed. and trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Essays, Hinderer, Walter and Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (eds.), The German library 17, New York: Continuum, 1995.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, ‘Über naive und sentimentalische Dichtung’, in Sämtliche Werke, Göpfert, Herbert G. (ed.), vol. V, Munich: Carl Hanser, 1960, pp. 694–780 (trans. Elias, Julius A., Naïve and sentimental poetry, On the sublime, New York: Frederick Ungar, 1966).Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, On the aesthetic education of man, Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A. (eds. and trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Naive and sentimental poetry, in Naive and sentimental poetry; and, On the sublime, Elias, Julius A. (trans.), New York: Ungar, 1966, pp. 81–190.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Naïve and sentimental poetry, On the sublime, Elias, Julius A. (trans.), New York: Ungar, 1966.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, ‘Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen’, in Werke und Briefe, vol. VIII: Theoretische Schriften, Janz, Rolf-Peter (ed.), 12 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1992, pp. 556–676 (trans. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A., On the aesthetic education of man, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, Black, John (trans.), London: Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, , Ernst Behler and Struc, Roman (trans.), Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), 35 vols., Paderborn: Schöningh, 1958–79.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, Black, John (trans.), Morrison, Alexander James William (ed.), London: Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Lectures on the history of literature, ancient and modern, Frost, John (ed.), Philadelphia, PA: Moss & Co., 1863.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Friedrich Schlegel's ‘Lucinde’ and the fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Friedrich Schlegel's ‘Lucinde’ and the fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Über die Sprache und die Weisheit der Indier: ein Beitrag zur BegrÜndung der Altertumskunde, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1977 (trans. Millington, E. J., The aesthetic and miscellaneous works of Frederick von Schlegel, London: Bohn, 1849).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Über das Studium der griechischen Poesie’, in Kritische Schriften und Fragmente: Studienausgabe in sechs Bänden, Behler, Ernst and Eichner, Hans (eds.), 6 vols., Paderborn: Schöningh, 1988, I: 62–136.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Über das Studium der griechischen Poesie’, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), 35 vols., Paderborn: Schöningh, 1958–79.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), 35 vols., Paderborn: Schöningh, 1958–79.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, ‘Briefe über Poesie, Silbenmass und Sprache’, in Kritische Schriften und Briefe, vol. I: Sprache und Poetik, Lohner, Edgar (ed.), Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1962, pp. 141–80.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, Kritische Ausgabe der Vorlesungen, vol. I: Vorlesungen über Ästhetik I (1798–1803), Behler, Ernst (ed.), Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Zur Philologie’, in Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. XVI: Fragmente zur Poesie und Literatur I, Eichner, Hans (ed.), Paderborn: Schöningh, 1981, pp. 33–82.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, London: H. G. Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, Sämmtliche Werke, Böcking, Eduard (ed.), Leipzig: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks, Eichner, Hans (ed.), University of London/Athlone Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Ernst Behler with the collaboration of Anstett, Jean-Jacques, Eichner, Hans, et al. (eds.), Paderborn: Schöningh, 1958–.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, A Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, Behler, Ernst and Struc, Roman (trans.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks (1797–1801), Eichner, Hans (ed.), London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophische Lehrjahre I (1796–1806), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), vol. XVIII, Munich: Schöningh, 1963.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophische Vorlesungen I (1800–1807), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Anstett, Jean-Jacques (ed.), vol. XII, Munich: Schöningh, 1964.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Eichner, Hans (ed.), vol. II, Munich: Schöningh, 1967.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Friedrich Schlegel's ‘Lucinde’ and the fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Charakteristiken und Kritiken II (1802–1829), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Eichner, Hans (ed.), vol. III, Munich: Schöningh, 1975.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Fragmente zur Poesie und Literatur I, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Eichner, Hans (ed.), vol. XVI, Munich: Schöningh, 1981.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, Morrison, Alexander James William (ed.), Black, John (trans.), London: Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks, 1797–1801, Eichner, Hans (ed.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Dialogue on poetry’, in Behler, Ernst and Struc, Roman (trans.), Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1968, pp. 51–117.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks (1797–1801), Eichner, Hans (ed.), University of London, Athlone Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Goethes Werke nach der Cottaschen Ausgabe von 1806’, in Kritische Schriften, Rasch, Wolfdietrich (ed.), Munich: Hanser, 1964, pp. 288–322.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, Behler, Ernst and Struc, Roman (eds. and trans.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Friedrich Schlegel's ‘Lucinde’ and the fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Letter about the novel,’ in German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Wheeler, Kathleen M. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘On Goethe's Meister’, in German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Wheeler, Kathleen M. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 59–73.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Literary notebooks, 1797–1801, Eichner, Hans (ed.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), Munich: Schöningh, 1958–.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Philosophical fragments, Firchow, Peter (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Dorothea Veit, Florentin: Roman, Fragmente, Varianten, Weissberg, Liliane (ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein, 1987 (trans. Lawler, Edwina and Richardson, Ruth, Florentin, Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1988).Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Fragmente’, in Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, 35 vols., Behler, Ernst and Eichner, Hans (eds.), Munich: Schöningh, 1958, II: 147–272.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Lucinde, in Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. V: Dichtungen, Eichner, Hans (ed.), Munich: Schöningh, 1962, 35 vols., pp. 1–9 (trans. Firchow, Peter, Friedrich Schlegel'sLucinde’ and the fragments, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Gespräch über die Poesie, in Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. II: Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801), Eichner, Hans (ed.), Munich: Schöningh, 1967, pp. 284–362 (trans. Behler, Ernst and Struc, Roman, Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1968), pp. 51–117Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, ‘Fragments’, in German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Wheeler, Kathleen (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 40–80.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, Morrison, Alexander James William (ed.), Black, John (trans.), Bohn's Standard Library 46, London: Bell & Sons, 1886.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Geschichte der alten und neuen Literatur, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Eichner, Hans (ed.), vol. VI, Munich: Schöningh, 1961.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Studien des klassischen Altertums, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Behler, Ernst (ed.), vol. I, Munich: Schöningh, 1979.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, Vorlesungen über schöne Litteratur und Kunst, Minor, Jacob (ed.), 3 vols., Heilbronn: Henninger, 1884.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Gespräch über die Poesie, in Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. II: Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801), Eichner, Hans (ed.), Munich: Schöningh, 1967, pp. 284–362.Google Scholar
Schlegel-Schelling, Cardine, Caroline: Briefe aus der Frühromantik, Schmidt, Erich (ed.), 2 vols., Leipzig: Insel, 1913.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich, A critical essay on the Gospel of Luke, Thirlwall, Connop (trans. with an introduction), London: John Taylor, 1825.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich, On religion: speeches to its cultured despisers [1800], Crouter, Richard (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich, Hermeneutik und Kritik: mit einem Anhang sprach-philosophischer Texte, Frank, Manfred (ed.), Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977 (trans. Duke, James and Forstman, Jack, Hermeneutics: the handwritten manuscripts, Kimmerle, Heinz (ed.), Atlanta, GA: Scholar Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich, ‘Roman’, inÄsthetik. Über den Begridff der Kunst, Lehnerer, Thomas (ed.), Hamburg: Meiner, 1984, pp. 142–7.Google Scholar
Schlick, Yael, ‘Beyond the boundaries: Staël, Genlis, and the impossible “femme célèbre”’, Symposium 50 (1996), pp. 50–63.Google Scholar
Schnur, Harald, Schleiermachers Hermeneutik und ihre Vorgeschichte im 18. Jahrhundert: Studien zur Bibelauslegung, zu Hamann, Herder und F. Schlegel, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenbaum, S., Shakespeare's lives, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Schoenfield, Mark, ‘Regulating standards: the Edinburgh review and the circulations of judgement’, Wordsworth circle 24 (1993), pp. 148–51.Google Scholar
Schoenfield, Mark, The professional Wordsworth: law, labor, and the poet's contract, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The world as will and representation, Payne, E. F. J. (trans.), 2 vols., New York: Dover, 1969.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The world as will and representation, Payne, E. F. J. (trans.), vol. I, New York: Dover, 1969, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi, George Sand and idealism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Schubert, Gotthilf Heinrich, Ansichten von der Nachtseite der Naturwissenschaft, Dresden: Arnold, 1808.Google Scholar
Schulte, Rainer and Biguenet, John (eds.), Theories of translation: an anthology of essays from Dryden to Derrida, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen et al. (eds.), Theory as practice: a critical anthology of early German Romantic writings, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen, ‘The concept of literary criticism in German Romanticism, 1795–1810’, in Hohendahl, Peter Uwe (ed.), Ahistory of German literary criticism, 1730–1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1988, pp. 99–177.Google Scholar
Schultz, Franz, Klassik und Romantik der Deutschen. Erster Teil: die Grundlagen der klassisch-romantischen Literatur, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1935.Google Scholar
Schweizer, Niklaus Rudolf, The ut pictura poesis controversy in eighteenth-century England and Germany, Bern: Herbert Lang, 1972.Google Scholar
Scott, Walter, Sir Walter Scott on novelists and fiction, Williams, Ioan M. (ed.), London: Routledge & Paul, 1968.Google Scholar
Scott, Walter, ‘Prefaces to the edition of 1829’, in Waverley; or, 'tis sixty years since, Lamont, Claire (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, David, Pictorialist poetics: poetry and the visual arts in nineteenth-century France, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Scurla, Herbert, Begegnungen mit Rahel: der Salon der Rahel Levin, Berlin: Verlag der Nation, 1978.Google Scholar
Setzer, Sharon, ‘Mary Robinson's sylphid self: the end of feminine self-fashioning’, Philological quarterly 75 (1996), pp. 501–20.Google Scholar
Seward, Anna, Poetical works of Anna Seward with extracts from her literary correspondence, Scott, Walter (ed.), 3 vols., London: Longman, 1810.Google Scholar
Seyhan, Azade, Representation and its discontents: the critical legacy of German Romanticism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Seyhan, Azade, ‘Cannons against the canon: representations of tradition and modernity in Heine's literary history’, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift för Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 63 (1989), pp. 494–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sha, Richard C., The visual and verbal sketch in British Romanticism, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, E. S., ‘Metaphysics of culture: Kant and Coleridge's Aids to reflection’, Journal of the history of ideas 31 (1970), pp. 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, E. S., ‘Kubla Khan’ and ‘The fall of Jerusalem’: the mythological school in Biblical criticism and secular literature, 1770–1880, Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Shaffer, E. S., ‘Coleridge and Schleiermacher: the hermeneutic community’, in The Coleridge connection, Gravil, Richard and Lefebure, Molly (eds.), Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990, pp. 200–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, The complete poetical works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Rogers, Neville (ed.), vol. II, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, Shelley's poetry and prose: authoritative texts, criticism, Reiman, Donald H. and Powers, Sharon B. (eds.), New York: Norton, 1977.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, Frankenstein: the 1818 text, contexts, nineteenth-century responses, modern criticism, Hunter, J. Paul (ed.), New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, ‘Defence of poetry’, in Shelley's prose, or the trumpet of a prophecy, Clark, David Lee (ed.), New York: New Amsterdam Books, 1988pp. 275–97.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary, Frankenstein: or, the modern Prometheus, Joseph, M. K. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, Shelley's Poetry and Prose, Reiman, Donald H. and Powers, Sharon B. (eds.), New York: Norton, 1977.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, ‘Essay on Christianity’, in Shelley's prose, or the trumpet of a prophecy, Clark, David Lee (ed.), New York: New Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 196–214.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, The Poems of Shelley, vol. I, Matthews, Geoffrey and Everest, Kelvin (eds.), London: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, A defence of poetry, in Shelley's poetry and prose: authoritative texts, criticism, Reiman, Donald H. and Powers, Sharon B. (eds.), New York: Norton, 1977, pp. 478–508.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, The prose works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Murray, E. B. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, Shelley's prose, or The trumpet of a prophecy, Clark, David Lee (ed.), Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, The journals of Mary Shelley, 1814–1844, Feldman, Paula and Scott-Kilvert, Diana (eds.), 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, Frankenstein, or, the modern Prometheus, Macdonald, David L. and Scherf, Kathleen (eds.), Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, Shelley's poetry and prose: authoritative texts, criticism, Reiman, Donald H. and Powers, Sharon B. (eds.), New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, ‘Defence of poetry’, in Complete works, Ingpen, Roger and Peck, Walter E. (eds.), vol. VII, New York: Gordian Press, 1965, 10 vols.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, Shelley's poetry and prose: authoritative texts, criticism, Reiman, Donald H. and Powers, Sharon B. (eds.), New York: Norton, 1977.Google Scholar
Shrayer, Maxim D., ‘Rethinking romantic irony: Puškin, Byron, Schlegel and The queen of spades’, Slavic and East European journal 36, (1992), pp. 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, David, Wordsworth and the figurings of the real, London: Macmillan, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, David, Wordsworth's historical imagination: the poetry of displacement, London and New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, nationalism, and the revolt against theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, The academic postmodern and the rule of literature: a report on half-knowledge, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Simpson, David (ed.), German aesthetic and literary criticism: Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Schopenhauer, Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Simpson, David (ed.), The origins of modern critical thought: German aesthetic and literary criticism from Lessing to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Foreword, , The philosophy of art, by Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, Stott, Douglas W. (ed. and trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989, pp. ix–xxiv.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, ‘Romanticism, criticism and theory’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 1–24, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, nationalism and the revolt against theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Irony and authority in Romantic poetry, London: Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, David (ed.), The origins of modern critical thought: German aesthetic and literary criticism from Lessing to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, nationalism and the revolt against theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford, The work of writing: literature and social change in Britain, 1700–1830, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian, Clayton, John C., Katz, Steven and Sherry, Patrick (eds.), Nineteenth century religious thought in the West, 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, Bryce, J. C. (ed.) Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, John, The spirit and the letter: traces of rhetoric in Hegel's philosophy of Bildung, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Charlotte, Desmond, 1792, rpt. New York: Garland, 1974.Google Scholar
Smith, Charlotte, Marchmont, 1796, rpt. Delmar, NY: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints, 1989.Google Scholar
Smith, Charlotte, The poems of Charlotte Smith, Curran, Stuart (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Snelders, H. A. M., ‘Romanticism and Naturphilosophie and the inorganic natural sciences 1787–1840: an introductory survey’, Studies in Romanticism 9 (1970), pp. 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solger, Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand, Erwin: vier Gespräche über das Schöne und die Kunst, Henckmann, Wolfhart (ed.), Munich: Fink, 1971.Google Scholar
Solger, Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand, Vorlesungen über Ästhetik, Heyse, K. W. L. (ed.), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1962.Google Scholar
Southey, Robert (ed.), Specimens of the later English poets, 3 vols., London: Longman, 1807.Google Scholar
Spaethling, Robert, Music and Mozart in the life of Goethe, Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1987.Google Scholar
Sperber, Daniel and Wilson, Deirdre, ‘Irony and the use–mention distinction’, in Radical pragmatics, Cole, Peter (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1981pp. 295–318.Google Scholar
Sperry, Stuart M., ‘Toward a definition of romantic irony in English literature’, in Romantic and Modern: revaluations of literary tradition, Bornstein, George (ed.), Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1977, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, Germany, 2 vols., London: John Murray, 1814.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, De la littérature considérée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales, Paris: Maradan, 1800 (trans. Boileau, Daniel, The influence of literature upon society, Boston, MA: Wells & Wait, 1813).Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, The influence of literature upon society, Boileau, Daniel (trans.), 2nd ed., 2 vols., London: Henry Colburn, 1812.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, Germany, 3 vols., London: John Murray, 1813.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, De l'Allemagne, Pange, Jean and Balay, Simone (eds.), new edn, 5 vols., Paris: Hachette, 1958–60 (trans. Wright, O. W., Germany, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1859).Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, ‘Essay on fictions’, in An extraordinary woman: selected writings of Germaine de Staël, Folkenflik, Vivian (trans.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1987, pp. 60–78.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame, De la littérature considerée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales, Paris: Maradan, 1800 (trans. A treatise on ancient and modern literature, London: George Cawthorn, 1803, 2 vols.).Google Scholar
Staël, Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, Corinne; ou, l'Italie, Paris: Nicolle, 1807 (trans. Goldberger, Avriel H., Corinne, or, Italy, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Staël, Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, De l'Allemagne, 3 vols. Paris: Nicolle, 1813 (Germany, 3 vols., London: John Murray, 1813).Google Scholar
Staël, Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, De la littérature considerée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales, Paris: Charpentier, 1887.Google Scholar
Staël, Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, Essai sur les fictions; De l'influence des passions sur le bonheur des individus et des nations, Tournier, Michel (ed.), Paris: Editions Ramsay, 1979 (A treatise on the influence of the passions upon the happiness of individuals and nations, London: Cawthorn, 1798).Google Scholar
Staël, Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, An extraordinary woman: selected writings of Germaine de Staël, Folkenflik, Vivian (trans.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Staël, Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, Delphine, Goldberger, Avriel H. (trans.), DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Staiger, Emil, Basic concepts of poetics, Burkhard, Marianne and Frank, Luanne T. (eds.), Hudson, Janetta C. and Frank, Luanne T. (trans.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Stendhal, , Racine et Shakespeare, Martineau, Henri (ed.), Paris: Le Divan, 1928 (trans. Daniels, Guy, Racine and Shakespeare, New York: Crowell-Collier Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Stendhal, , Racine and Shakespeare, Daniels, Guy (trans.), New York: Crowell-Collier Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Stephan, Inge, ‘Weibliche und männliche Autorschaft: zum “Florentin” von Dorothea Schlegel und zur “Lucinde” von Friedrich Schlegel’, in ‘Wen kümmert's, wer spricht?’: zur Literatur und Kulturgeschichte von Frauen aus Ost und West, Stephan, Inge, Weigel, Sigrid and Wilhelms, Kerstin (eds.), Cologne: Böhlau, 1991, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie, History of English thought in the eighteenth century, London: Smith, 1881.Google Scholar
Stephens, John C., ‘“Classic” and “Romantic”’, Emory University quarterly 15 (1959), pp. 212–19.Google Scholar
Stephenson, R. H., Goethe's conception of knowledge and science, Edinburgh University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Stern, Bernard S., The rise of Romantic Hellenism in English literature 1732–86, Menash, WI: George Banta, 1940.Google Scholar
Storr, Vernon F., The development of English theology in the nineteenth century, 1800–1860, London: Longmans, Green, 1913.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich, The life of Jesus, critically examined, Eliot, George (trans.), London: Chapman Brothers, 1846.Google Scholar
Strohschneider-Kohrs, Ingrid, Die romantische Ironie in Theorie und Gestaltung, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1960.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere Paul, ‘The historical and systematic place of Fichte's reflections on language’ in Fichte: historical contexts/contemporary controversies, Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1994, pp. 113–27.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere Paul, Language and German idealism: Fichte's linguistic philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Swann, Karen, ‘Literary gentlemen and lovely ladies: the debate on the character of Christabel’, ELH 52 (1985), pp. 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, Karen, ‘Harrassing the Muse’, in Mellor, (ed.), Romanticism and feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
Swedenborg, Emanuel, Swedenborg: essential readings, Stanley, Michael (ed.), Wellingborough: Crucible, 1988.Google Scholar
Swiatecka, M. Jadwiga, The idea of the symbol: some nineteenth century comparisons with Coleridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter, ‘Antike und Moderne in der Ästhetik der Goethezeit’, in Poetik und Geschichtsphilosophie i, Metz, Senta and Hildebrandt, Hans-Hagen (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 11–265.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter, ‘Friedrich Schlegel and romantic irony, with some remarks on Tieck's comedies’, in On textual understanding and other essays, Mendelsohn, Harvey (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1986pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter, ‘Friedrich Schlegel's theory of poetical genres: a reconstruction from the posthumous fragments’, in On textual understanding and other essays, Mendelsohn, Harvey (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter, ‘Antike und Moderne in der Ästhetik der Goethezeit’, in Poetik und Geschichtsphilosophie I, Metz, Senta and Hildebrandt, Hans-Hagen (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 11–265.Google Scholar
Taine, Hippolyte, History of English literature, Laun, Henri (trans.), 4 vols., Philadelphia, PA: Altemus, 1908.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Leslie, Biblical tradition in Blake's early prophecies: the great code of art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘Language and human nature’ in Human agency and language: philosophical papers, Cambridge University Press, 1985, I: 215–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John Tinnan, Early opposition to the English novel: the popular reaction from 1760–1830, New York: King's Crown Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary, Reinventing Shakespeare: a cultural history from the Restoration to the present, New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Irene and Luria, Gina, ‘Gender and genre: women in British Romantic literature’, in Springer, Marlene (ed.), What manner of woman: essays on English and American life and literature, New York: New York University Press, 1977, pp. 98–123.Google Scholar
Thayer, Mary R., The influence of Horace on the chief English poets of the nineteenth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1916.Google Scholar
Thomas, Quincey, Collected Writings, new edn, Masson, David (ed.), 14 vols., Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, 1889–90.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P., The making of the English working class, London: Gollancz, 1965.Google Scholar
Thorslev, Peter, ‘German Romantic idealism’, in The Cambridge companion to. British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, Thomas, ‘To the public’, Analytical review 1 (1788), pp. i–vi.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, 2 vols., New York: Vintage Books, 1945.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Theories of the symbol, Porter, Catherine (trans.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Genres in discourse, Porter, Catherine (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen, Apeliotes oder der Sinn der Sprache: Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprach-Bild, Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1986.Google Scholar
Träger, Claus and Schaefer, Frauke (ed.), Die französische Revolution im Spiegel der deutschen Literatur, Frankfurt am Main: Röderberg, 1979.Google Scholar
Trumpener, Katie, Bardic nationalism: the Romantic novel and the British Empire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Trumpener, Katie, ‘National character, nationalist plots: national tale and historical novel in the age of Waverley, 1806–1830’, ELH 60 (1993), pp. 685–731.Google Scholar
Ueding, Gerd, Schillers Rhetorik: Idealistische Wirkungsästhetik und rhetorische Tradition, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1971.Google Scholar
Ueding, Gerd (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1992ff.Google Scholar
Underwood, Ted, ‘The science in Shelley's theory of poetry’, Modern language quarterly 58 (1997), pp. 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rennes, Jacob Johan, Bowles, Byron, and the Pope controversy, Norwood, PA: Norwood Editions, 1927.Google Scholar
Van Tieghem, Paul, Le romantisme dans la littérature européenne, Paris: Michel, 1948.Google Scholar
Varnhagen, Rahel, Gesammelte Werke, Feilchenfeldt, Konrad, Schweikert, Uwe, and Steiner, Rahel E. (eds.), 10 vols., Munich: Mattes & Seitz, 1983.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Ginette, ‘Friedrich Schlegel's practice of literary theory’, The Germanic review 69, (1994), pp. 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, Giambattista, The new science of Giambattista Vico, Bergin, Thomas Goddard and Fisch, Max Harold (eds. and trans.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Vines, Sherard, The course of English Classicism from the Tudor period to the Victorian age, London: Hogarth Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory, Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, Thomas A., ‘Romanticism and literary periods: the future of the past’, New German critique 38 (1986), pp. 131–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wackenroder, Wilhelm Heinrich, Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, Vietta, Silvio and Littlejohns, Richard (eds.), 2 vols., Heidelberg: Winter, 1991.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard, Gesammelte Schriften, Kapp, Julius (ed.), 14 vols., Leipzig: Hesse & Becker, 1914.Google Scholar
Waldstein, Edith J., Bettina von Arnim and the politics of Romantic conversation, Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1988.Google Scholar
Waldstein, Edith J., ‘Goethe and beyond: Bettina von Arnim's Correspondenic with a child and Günderrode’, in Goodman, and Waldstein, (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Walzel, Oskar, German Romanticism, Lussky, Alma Elise (trans.), New York: Putnam's Sons, 1932.Google Scholar
Walzer, Arthur E., ‘Rhetoric and gender in Jane Austen's Persuasion’, College English 57 (1995), pp. 688–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Orrin N. C.The other reasons: female alterity and Enlightenment discourse in Mary Wollstonecraft's A vindication of the rights of woman’, Yale journal of criticism 5 (1991), pp. 129–49.Google Scholar
Warhol, Robyn, ‘The look, the body, and the heroine: a feminist–narratological reading of Persuasion’, Novel 26 (Fall 1992), pp. 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Jean, ‘Coleridge's androgynous ideal’, Prose studies 6 (1983), pp. 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Timothy, ‘Romantic Hellenism’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, Curran, Stuart (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 148–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Ernst (ed.), Texte zur Romantheorie, vol. II, Munich: Fink, 1981, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Weber, William, The rise of musical classics in eighteenth-century England: a study in canon, ritual, and ideology, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Weigel, Sigrid, ‘Wider die romantische Mode: zur ästhetischen Funktion des Weiblichen in Friedrich Schlegels Lucinde’, in Die verborgene Frau: sechs Beiträge zu einer feministischen Literaturwissenschaft, Berlin: Argument, 1983, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
Weisinger, Herbert, ‘English treatment of the Classical–Romantic problem’, Modern language quarterly 7 (1946), pp. 477–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas, The Romantic sublime: studies in the structure and psychology of transcendence, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas, The Romantic sublime: studies in the structure and psychology of transcendence, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Weissberg, Liliane, ‘Turns of emancipation: on Rahel Varnhagen's letters’, in Goodman, and Waldstein, (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
Weissenberger, Klaus, ‘A morphological genre theory: an answer to a pluralism of forms’, in Theories of literary genre, Strelka, Joseph P. (ed.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1978, pp. 229–53.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude, Protestant thought in the nineteenth century, vol. 1: 1799–1870, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘The concept of “Romanticism” in literary history: the term “Romantic” and its derivatives’, Comparative literature 1 (1949), pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘German and English Romanticism’, Studies in Romanticism 4 (1964), pp. 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellek, René, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, vol. II: The Romantic age, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘The concept of Romanticism in literary history’, in Concepts of criticism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1963, pp. 128–98.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, Immanuel Kant in England, 1793–1838, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, vol. I: The later eighteenth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, vol. II: The Romantic age, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘Romanticism re-examined’, in Romanticism reconsidered, Frye, Northrop (ed.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1963, pp. 107–34.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, Immanuel Kant in England, 1793–1838, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, Confrontations: studies in the intellectual and literary relations between Germany, England, and the United States during the nineteenth century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘Genre theory, the lyric, and Erlebnis’, in Discriminations: further concepts of criticism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970, pp. 225–52.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, vols. I–III, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, The rise of English literary history, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘The concept of Romanticism in literary history’, Concepts of criticism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1963, pp. 128–98.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘The parallelism between literature and the arts’, in English Institute annual: 1941, New York: AMS Press, 1965, pp. 29–63.Google Scholar
Wessell, Leonard P., The philosophical background to Friedrich Schiller's aesthetics of living form, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1982.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Walter D., ‘Aspects of natural science in German Romanticism’, Studies in Romanticism 10 (1971), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, Walter D., Johann Wilhelm Ritter: Physik im Wirkungsfeld der deutschen Romantik, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Kathleen (ed.), German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
White, Gilbert, The natural history of Selborne, Foster, Paul G. M. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
White, Hayden, Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North, Science and the modern world, New York: Macmillan, 1925.Google Scholar
Whyte, Lancelot Law, The unconscious before Freud, London: Freidmann, 1978.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, Culture and society, 1780–1950, London: Chatto & Windus, 1958.Google Scholar
Williams, Ioan M. (ed.), Novel and romance, 1700–1800: a documentary record, New York: Barnes & Noble, 1970.Google Scholar
Williams, Helen Maria, Peru: a poem, London: Cadell, 1784.Google Scholar
Williams, Helen Maria, Julia, Luria, Gina (ed.), 2 vols., 1790, rpt. New York: Garland, 1974.Google Scholar
Wilson, Carol Shiner and Haefner, Joel (eds.), Re-visioning Romanticism: British women writers, 1776–1837, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilt, Judith, Secret leaves: the novels of Walter Scott, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. Jr, ‘The structure of Romantic nature imagery’, in Romanticism and consciousness: essays in criticism, Bloom, Harold (ed.), New York: Norton, 1970, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K., ‘Organic form: some questions about a metaphor’, in Romanticism: vistas, instances, continuities, Thorburn, David and Hartman, Geoffrey (eds.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1973, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
Winn, James A., Unsuspected eloquence: a history of the relations between poetry and music, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph Anthony Jr, Angel of apocalypse: Blake's idea of Milton, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph Anthony Jr, Visionary poetics: Milton's tradition and his legacy, San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1979.Google Scholar
Wolf, F. A., Prolegomena to Homer (1795) (with introduction and notes) Grafton, Anthony, Most, Glenn W. and Zetzel, James E. G. (trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ‘The formings of simile’, in Formal charges: the shaping of poetry in British Romanticism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 63–99.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ‘Feminizing Keats’, in Critical essays on John Keats, Almeida, Hermione (ed.), Boston, MA: Hall, 1990, pp. 317–56.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ‘The “domestic affections” and “the spear of Minerva”: Felicia Hemans and “the dilemma of gender”’, in Wilson, and Haefner, (eds.), Re-visioning Romanticism, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennyslvania Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ‘“A problem few dare imitate”: Sardanapalus and “effeminate character”’, ELH 58 (1991), pp. 867–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ‘Gendering the soul’ in Feldman, and Kelley, (eds.), Romantic women writers, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1995, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ‘Romanticism and gender’, in A companion to Romanticism, Wu, Duncan (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 1998, pp. 385–96.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary, The works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Todd, Janet and Butler, Marilyn (eds.), vol. VII: On poetry: contributions to the Analytical review, London: Pickering, 1989, 7 vols.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary, A vindication of the rights of woman, Kramnick, Miriam Brody (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary, Mary, a fiction and The wrongs of woman, 1798, rpt. Kelly, Gary (ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary, The collected letters of Mary Wollstonecraft, Wardle, Ralph M. (ed.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary, Vindication of the rights of woman, in A vindication of the rights of men, MacDonald, David L. and Scherf, Kathleen (eds.), Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview, 1997.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul S., ‘The opposition to neo-Classicism in England between 1660 and 1700’, PMLA 43 (1928), pp. 182–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha, The author, art, and the market: rereading the history of aesthetics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The prose works of William Wordsworth, Grosart, Alexander Balloch (ed.), rev. edn, vol. II, London: E. Moxon, 1967, 3 vols.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, Wordsworth: poetical works, Hutchinson, Thomas (ed.), Selincourt, Ernest (rev. edn), London: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William and Dorothy, , The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: the middle years, part I: 1806–11, Selincourt, Ernest (ed.), Moorman, Mary (rev.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William and Dorothy, , The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: the later years, part I: 1821–28, Selincourt, Ernest (ed.), Hill, Alan G. (rev.), 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William and Dorothy, , The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: the later years, part II: 1829–34, Selincourt, Ernest (ed.), Hill, Alan G. (rev.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The prose works of William Wordsworth, Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington (eds.), 3 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The prelude 1799, 1805, 1850: authoritative texts, contexts and reception, recent critical essays, Wordsworth, Jonathan, Abrams, M. H. and Gill, Stephen Charles (eds.), New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, Preface to Lyrical ballads, in The prose works of William Wordsworth, Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington (eds.), 3 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974, I: 118–59.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, Poems, Arnold, Matthew (ed.), London: Macmillan, 1879.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, Prose works, Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington (eds.), 3 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The Cornell Wordsworth, Parrish, Stephen (ed.), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth, Hill, Alan G. (ed.), 8 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979–89.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, The prelude 1799, 1805, 1850, Wordsworth, Jonathan, Abrams, M. H. and Gill, Stephen (eds.), New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, Prose Works, Warwick, J. B. O. and Smyser, J. W. (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Worringer, Wilhelm, Abstraction and empathy: a contribution to the psychology of style, Bullock, Michael (trans.), Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Wyatt, John, Wordsworth and the geologists, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wylie, Ian, Young Coleridge and the philosophers of nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Young, Edward, The complete works, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1968, reprint of the 1854 London edition.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H., The genesis of Kant's ‘Critique of judgment’, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zantop, Susanne, ‘The beautiful soul writes herself: Friedrike Helene Unger and the “Grosse Göthe”’, in Goodman, and Waldstein, (eds.), In the shadow of Olympus, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, Theodore, German Romanticism and its institutions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Zionkowski, Linda, ‘Territorial disputes in the republic of letters: canon formation and the literary profession’, The eighteenth century: theory and interpretation 31 (1990), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj, Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel, and the critique of ideology, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marshall Brown, University of Washington
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300100.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marshall Brown, University of Washington
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300100.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marshall Brown, University of Washington
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300100.020
Available formats
×