Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 404 - 465Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
References
All except you, ‘Repères’, Galerie Maeght (1983).
Alors, la Chine? (1975).
, ‘Idéologic et appareils idéologiques d'Etat’, (1970), in Positions (Paris, 1976), pp. 67–125; ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses’, trans. , in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (London, 1971), pp. 121–73.Google Scholar
, ‘Freud et Lacan’ in Positions (Paris, 1976) pp. 9–34; ‘Freud and Lacan’, trans. , in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 177–202.Google Scholar
, ‘Letter on Art’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 203–8.
, ‘Cremonini, painter of the abstract’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 209–20.
, ‘The hermeneutics of literary indeterminancy: a dissenting from the orthodoxy’, New Literary History, 10 (1978–1979), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning and Humanistic Understanding (Amherst, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘The poem as act: a way to reconcile presentation and mimetic theories’, Iowa Review, 6 (1975), 103–24.Google Scholar
, ‘The qualities of action: a theory of middles in literature’, Boundary 2, 5 (1977), 323–50, 899–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The hermeneutics of literary indeterminacy: a dissent from the new orthodoxy’, New Literary History, 10 (1978), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning and Humanistic Understanding (Amherst, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘Erwartungshorizont: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag zu H. R. Jauβ’ Begründung einer Rezeptionsästhetik der Literatur’, Euphorion, 70 (1976), 398–408.Google Scholar
, Critical Genealogies: Historical Situations for Postmodern Literary Studies (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The conflict of interpretations and the limits of pluralism’, Publication of the Modern Language Association, 98 (1983), 341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Notes sur le métalangage et la d´négation lacanienne’, in and , Aims and Prospects, pp. 99–112.
, and (eds.), Writing and Reading Differently: Deconstruction and the Teaching of Composition and Literature (Lawrence, KS, 1985).Google Scholar
, Peculiar Language: Literature as Difference from the Renaissance to James Joyce (London and Ithaca, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, La Psychanalyse du feu (Paris, 1938); The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar
, L'Eau et les rêves (Paris, 1942); Water and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Matter, trans. (Dallas, 1983).Google Scholar
, La Poétique de la Rêverie (Paris, 1960); The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language and the Cosmos, trans. (Boston, 1969).Google Scholar
, On Poetic Imagination and Reverie: Selections from the Works of Gaston Bachelard, trans. (Indianapolis, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays on the Novel, ed. , trans. and (Austin, TX, 1981).Google Scholar
, Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Works, ed. and , trans. (Austin, TX, 1990).Google Scholar
, ‘The narrating and the focalizing: a theory of the agents in narrative’, Style, 17 (1983), 234–69.Google Scholar
, Les Français fictifs: le rapport des styles littéraires au franqais national (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘An example of literary work in France: Georges Sand's “La Mare au diable'V “The Devil's Pool” of 1846’, in 1848: The Sociology of Literature, ed. et al. (Colchester, 1978), pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
, ‘National language, education, literature’, in Literature, Politics and Theory, ed. et al. (London, 1986), pp. 126–47.Google Scholar
, and , Le Français national: politique et practique de la language nationale sur la Révolution (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘An example of literary work in France: Georges Sand's “La Mare au diable'V “The Devil's Pool” of 1846’, in 1848: The Sociology of Literature, ed. et al. (Colchester, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘National language, education, literature’, in Literature, Politics and Theory, ed. et al. (London, 1986).Google Scholar
, and , Le Français national: politique et practique de la language nationale sur la Révolution (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘Deconstructive practice and legal theory’, Yale Law Journal, 96 (1987), 743–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
, Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Russian Formalism: A Collection of Articles and Texts in Translation (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar
, , Eléments de Sémiologie (Paris, 1964); Elements of Semiology, trans. and (London, 1967).Google Scholar
, ‘Structuralism and the revival of rhetoric’, in and (eds.), The Sociology of Literature: Theoretical Approaches, Sociological Review monograph 25 (Keele, 1977), pp. 68–84.Google Scholar
, ‘The career of Tel Quel: Tel Quel becomes L'lnfin’, Comparative Criticism, 6 (1984), pp. 327–39.Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeptionsästhetik und soziale Funktion der Literatur’, Weimarer Beiträge, 31, (1985), 1131–49.Google Scholar
, and , ‘Von der Rezeptions asthetik zur literarischen Hermeneutik’, Weimarer Beiträge, 32 (1986), 333–42.Google Scholar
et al. (eds.), Literature, Society, and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977).Google Scholar
et al. (eds.), Literature, Society, and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeptions- und Wirkungsgeschichte’, in and (eds.), Literatur wissenschaft: Grundkurs 2, (Reinbeck, 1981)81), pp. 102–24.Google Scholar
, ‘Uncanny criticism in the United States’, in Tracing Literary Theory, ed. (Urbana IL, 1987).Google Scholar
, Mythologies (Paris, 1957); Mythologies, trans. (London, 1972); The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies, trans. (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
, Eléments de sémiologie (Paris, 1964); Elements of Semiology, trans. and (London, 1967).Google Scholar
, ‘Introduction à l'analyse structurale des réciks’, Communications, 8 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives’, trans. , in (ed.), Image-Music-Text, pp. 79–124.
, ‘Introduction à l'analyse structurale des réeks’, Communications, 8 (1966), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits’, Communications, 8 (1966), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Fragments d'un discours amoureux (Paris, 1977); A Lover's Discourse. Fragments, trans. (New York, 1978; London, 1979).Google Scholar
Barthes après Barthes, une actualité en question 5. Actes du colloque international de Paris, ed. and (1994).Google Scholar
‘Barthes critique le “Barthes” de Barthes’, also entitled ‘Barthes puissance trois’ (Barthes to the third power), La Quinzaine littéraire 1–15 March, 1975.
(ed.), Sens et usage du terme structure dans les sciences humaines et sociales, 2nd edn (The Hague, 1972).Google Scholar
, L'Erotisme (Paris, 1957); Eroticism: Death and Sensuality, trans. (San Francisco, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘La Point de vue de la réception: Prestiges et problèmes d'une perspective’, Revue des Sciences Humaines, 40, n. 189, (1983), 21–36.Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistique et production textuelle’, in Tel Quel: Th´orie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 351–64.Google Scholar
‘The concept of literature’, in , , and (eds.), Literary Theory and Structure: Essays in Honor of William K. Wismatt (New Haven, 1973), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
, Les fabliaux: études de littérature populaire et d'histoire littéraire du moyen-âdge (1893; 6th edn Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
, L'Ame romantique et le rêve: essai sur la romantisme allemand et la poésie francaise, 2 vols. (Marseilles, 1937).Google Scholar
, ‘The new hermeneutics and comparative literature’, Neohelicon, 10 (1983), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Epistemologies of postmodernism: a rejoinder to Jean-Francois Lyotard’, New German Critique, 33 (1984), 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London, 1985).Google Scholar
, ‘The Romantic construction of the unconscious’, Literature, Politics, and Theory, ed. et al. (London, 1986), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
, Problèmes de linguistique générale (2 vols.) vol. I, (Paris, 1966), vol. 2, (Paris, 1974); Problems in General Linguistics, trans. (Coral Gables, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘La philosophic analytique et le language’, in Problems de linguistique generale, Volume I (Paris, 1966), pp. 267–76; trans, as ‘Analytical philosophy and language; in Problems in General Linguistics, Volume I (Coral Gables, FL, 1971), pp. 231–8.Google Scholar
, ‘Serious play: the ethico-political horizon of Jacques Derrida’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 1 (1987), 93–117.Google Scholar
, Beyond Objectivity and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis, (Philadelphia, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘La Problématique de la “réception” dans les deux Allemagnes’, Revue d'Histoire Littér aire de la France, 81 (1981), 109–20.Google Scholar
, Readings and Feelings: An Introduction to Subjective Criticism (Providence,IL, 1975).Google Scholar
, Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique (London, 1980).Google Scholar
, The Hermeneutic Imagination: Outline of a Positive Critique of Scientism and SociologyLondon, 1982).Google Scholar
(ed.), ‘In defense of authors and readers: a discussion by Wayne Booth, Wolfgang Iser, et al.’, Novel, 11 (1977), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, review of Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale, Modern Language Journal, 8 (1924), 317–19. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure (Geneva, 1941– ).
, Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der philologischen Wissenschaften, 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1886); On Interpretation and Criticism, trans. (Norman, OK, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and Roman Jakobson, ‘Slavjanskaja filologija v Rosii za gg. 1914–1921’, Slavia, 1 (1922), 171–84, 457–69, 626–36.Google Scholar
, Funkcie kroja na Maravskom Slovensku (Turčiansky sv. Martin, 1937); The Functions of Folk Costume in Moravian Slovakia, trans. (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘Die hermeneutische Spirale: überlegungen zu einer integrativen Literaturtheorie’, Poetica, 17 (1985), 355–71.Google Scholar
, ‘On the value of Hamlet’, in (ed.), Reinterpretations of Elizabethan Drama: Selected Papers from the English Institute (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
, ‘Peter Szondi: “Studies on Hölderlin"; exemplarity of a path’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Boundary 2, 5, no. 2 (1977).
, ‘Variations on authority: some deconstructive transformations of the new criticism’, in , , (eds.), The Yale Critics: Deconstruction in America (Minneapolis, 1983), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
, The Word's Body: An Incarnational Aesthetic of Interpretation (University, AL, 1979).Google Scholar
‘La logique des possibles narratifs’,
, ‘The Other and the One: Psychoanalysis, reading, the Sympo sium’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 396–456.Google Scholar
, ‘A loosening of tongues: from narrative economy to women writing’, Modern Language Notes, 99 (1984), 1141–161.Google Scholar
, ‘Zvukovye povtory’, in Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka, II (Petersburg, 1917).Google Scholar
, ‘Ritm i sintaksis: Materialy k izuceniju poeticeskoj reci’, Novyj Lef, 3–6 (1927).15–20, 23–9, 32–7, 33–9.Google Scholar
, Ishmael's White Whale: A Phenomenological Reading of ‘Moby Dick’, (New Haven, 1965).Google Scholar
, ‘Pour une esthétique de la production de la réception’, Etudes Francoises, 19 (1983/1984), 65–82.Google Scholar
, Inventions, Writing, Textuality, and Understanding in Literary History (New Haven, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Von der Texthermeneutik zur Handlungshermeneutik’, in et al. (ed.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literaturwissenschaft im hermeneutischen Gespräch (Munich, 1981), pp. 525–36.Google Scholar
,, ‘Hermeneutics of texts and hermeneutics of action’, New Literary History, 4 (1980), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure of hermeneutic experience and the problem of tradition’, New Literary History, 10 (1981), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Pražskaja lingvističeskaja škola’ [The Prague Linguistic School], and (eds.), Osnovnye napravlenija strukturalizma (Moscow, 1964), 46–126.Google Scholar
, Jan Mukařovský. Genese und System der tschechischen strukturalen Asthetik (Munich, 1985).Google Scholar
, Cinema Semiotics and the Work of Christian Metz, Screen special double issue, 14 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Psychology and form’ (1924), in Counter-Statement (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1968), pp. 29–44.Google Scholar
and , ‘Ideology, subjectivity and the artistic text’, in Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, On Ideology (London, 1978), pp. 216–22.Google Scholar
, ‘Professor Fish on the Milton Variorum’, Critical Inquiry, 3 (1976), 179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Criticism Without Boundaries: Directions and Crosscurrents in Postmodern Critical Theory (Notre Dame, 1987).Google Scholar
‘Ça prend’ (on Proust), Le Magazine littéraire, 144 (December 1978).
, ‘The book of signs: writing and visual difference in Gothic manuscript illuminations’, Word & Image, 1 (1985), 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction and the Hermeneutic Project (Bloomington, 1987).Google Scholar
Comparative Criticism, 5 (1983).
Carte e segni. A catalogue of an exhibition of Barthes' paintings and drawings (Milan, 1981).
, Surrealism and the Literary Imagination: A Study of Breton and Bachelard (The Hague, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, On Ideology (London, 1978) (Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 10).
, ‘O Vodicčkově metodologii literárnich dejin’ [On Vodička's methodology of literary history], in F. Vodička, Struktura vývoje (Prague, 1969), 329–50.Google Scholar
, ‘Die Grundkategorien des Prager literaturwissenschaftlichen Strukturalismus’, in and (eds.), Kritik, 137–68.
, and (eds.), The Prague Structuralist School Its History and Future (forthcoming).
, Le récit féminin. Contribution sémiologique à l'analyse du courrier du coeur et des entrevues ou ‘enquêtes’ sur la femme dans la presse féminine actuelle (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
, Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction (Minneapolis, 1984).Google Scholar
, Literary History in the wake of Roland Barthes: Re-Defining the Myths of Reading (Birmingham, AL, 1984).Google Scholar
, ‘The decomposition of the elephants: double-reading Daniel Deronda’ in Decomposing Figures: Rhetorical Readings in the Romantic Tradition (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 157–74.Google Scholar
, and , ‘Linguistics and literature’, in (ed.), Trends, X 250–94.
, ‘De l'histoire de la réception à l'histoire des mentalités: l'example du naturalisme français en Allemagne au tournant siécle’, Synthesis, 10 (1983). 53–64.Google Scholar
, ‘Théories de la réception: Perspectives comparatistes’, Degrés, 12, no. 39–40 (1984), j1–j15.Google Scholar
, ‘Méthodologie de la recéption: de la recherche à l'enseignement’, Neohelicon, 12, n. 1 (1985). 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Champs des études comparatistes de réception: Etat des recherches’, Oeuvres & Critiques, 11 (1986), 147–60.Google Scholar
, Einleitung zur richtigen Auslegung vernunftiger Reden and Schriften (Leipzig, 1742).Google Scholar
, ‘Gaston Bachelard's phenomenology of the imagination’, Romantic Review, 52 (1961), 36–47.Google Scholar
‘Bachelard's aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20 (1962), 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Semiotics of a literary work of art. Dedicated to the 90th birthday of Jan Mukařovský (1981–1975)’, Semiotica, 37 (1981)193–214.Google Scholar
, The Art of Discrimination. Thomson's The Seasons and the Language of Criticism (London, 1964).Google Scholar
, Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction (Princeton, 1978).Google Scholar
, Critique, 20 (1964), 1007–64 [On-Merleau-Ponty].
Communications, 36 (1982).
(ed.), Prétexte: Roland Barthes, Acts of a Colloquium at Cerisy-la-Salle (1977), 1978.Google Scholar
‘Lacan, Poe, and narrative repression’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), pp. 983–1005.Google Scholar
, ‘Gadamer and the author's authority: a language–game approach’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 44 (1986), 272–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Der ästhetische Gegenstand: Eine ph¨nomenologische Studie’, Zeitschriftfur Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 3 (1908) and 4 (1909), 400–55.Google Scholar
and , Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Critique, 302 (1972), 423–4 (1982)
, ‘Some doubts about the reader of Paradise Lost’, College English, 37 (1975), 372–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Do readers make meaning?’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 149–64.Google Scholar
, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (London, 1975).Google Scholar
, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
Cultural Hermeneutics, special issue on hermeneutics and critical theory, 2, no. 4 (1975).
, ‘On linguistic strata (levels)’, in Travaux linguistiques de Prague, IV (1971)127–43.Google Scholar
, ‘Wissenschaftstheorie, Hermeneutik, Literaturwissenschaft: Anmerkungen zu einem unterbliebenen und Beiträge zu einem künftigen Dialog über die Methodologie des Verstehens’, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift, 58 (1984), 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘The Fisher King: Wille zur Macht in Baltimore,’ Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984), 668–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Offending the profession (after Peter Handke)’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984), 706–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On first looking into Ricoeur's Interpretation Theory: a beginner's guide’, Pre/Text, 4 (1983), 225–36.Google Scholar
, ‘The ideal reader: a critical fiction’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 93 (1978), 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven, CT, 1979).Google Scholar
, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism (1971; rpt. Minneapolis, 1983).Google Scholar
, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, 2nd ed. (London, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Limited Inc abc’, Glyph, 2 (1977), 162–254; rpt. in Limited Inc (Evanstone, IL, 1988) along with ‘Afterword: toward an ethic of discussion’.Google Scholar
, ‘But Beyond…(letter to Anne McClintock and Rob Nixon)’, Critical Inquiry, 13 (Autumn, 1986), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘But, beyond …. (Open Letter to Anne McClintock and Rob Nixon)’, trans. , Critical Inquiry, 13 (1986), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Signature evenement contexte’, in Marges de la Philosophie (Paris, 1972), pp. 365–93Google Scholar
, Story, Sign, and Self: Phenomenology and Structuralism as Literary Critical Methods (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar
‘Deux femmes’, in Actes d'un procès pour viol en 1612, Editions des Femmes (1984), pp. xiii–xvii.
, Logics of Disintegration: Post-Structuralist Thought and the Claims of Critical Theory (London, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The index of the absent wound’, in et al. (eds.), October – The First Decade (London, 1987), pp. 39–57.Google Scholar
‘Digressions’ in Le bruissement (omitted in Rustle) Rustle), pp. 83–96.
, ‘Tracing hermeneutics’, in (ed.), Tracing Literary Theory (Urbana, 1987), pp. 54–79.Google Scholar
, ‘Roman Jakobson as a student of communication’, in Proceedings of the Roman Jakobson Colloquium (Rome, 1990)103–12.Google Scholar
, ‘Language, vision and phenomenology: Merleau-Ponty as a test case’, Modern Language Notes, 85 (1970), 803–14.Google Scholar
, Historik: Vorlesungen über Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte (Munich, 1858); Outline of the Principles of History, trans. (Boston, 1897).Google Scholar
, and , Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, trans. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, Phénoménologie de Vexpérience esthétique (Paris, 1952); The Phenom enology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
, ‘On the phenomenology and semiology of art’, Phenomenology and Natural Existence, ed. (Albany, 1973p83–94).Google Scholar
, In the Presence of the Sensuous: Essays in Aesthetics, trans. and (Atlantic Highlands, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘On aphanisis: a note on the dramaturgy of the subject in narrative analysis’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), 860–70.Google Scholar
, ‘Ecriture and 18th century fiction’, in et al. (eds.), Literature, Society and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977), pp. 55–8.Google Scholar
, ‘Tennyson: politics and society in “The Princess” and “In Memorian”’, in et al. (eds.), 1848: The Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1978), pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
, ‘The revolt of the reader’, in Against the Grain: Essays 1975–1985 (London, 1986), pp. 181–84.Google Scholar
, ‘Art, artifacts, and intentions’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 6 (1969), 165–9.Google Scholar
‘The truth value of literary statements,’ British Journal of Aesthetics, 12 (1972), 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘James's turn of the speech-act’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 23 (1983), 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutik’, in Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3rd edn, vol. 3 (Tübingen, 1962), pp. 242–64.Google Scholar
, ‘The influence of Roman Jakobson on the development of semiotics’, in and (eds.), Roman Jakobson39–58.
, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between two wars’, American Journal of Semiotics, 2, (1983), 3 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Formalizm v russkom hteraturovedenii’, Smolenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet: Naucnye izvestija, vol. 5, pt. 3 (Smolensk, 1925).Google Scholar
, Das dynamische System: Zur Entwicklung von Begriffund Metaphorik des System bei Jurij Tynjanov (New York, 1992).Google Scholar
(ed), Structuralism (New York, 1970) (first pub. as Yale French Studies, 36–7 (1966)).
, Lermontov: A Study in Literary-Historical Evaluation, trans. and (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘O'Henry and the theory of the short story’, in and (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics (Cambridge, MA, 1971), pp. 227–70.Google Scholar
‘The theory of the formal method’, in and (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics (Cambridge, MA, 1971), pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
Eléments de sémiologie (1964), reprinted with Le degré zéro de l'écriture with a new foreword (1965); Elements of Semiology, trans. and (London, 1964).Google Scholar
, ‘Disremembering Dedalus: “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man’”, in (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post–Structuralist Reader (London, 1981), pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
, ‘The effectiveness of the aesthetic function’, in , and (eds.), Structure137–59.
, Russian Formalism: History–Doctrine, 3rd edn (The Hague, 1969); American edn (New Haven, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘Bühlers Organon-Modell und die Semiotik der Kunst’, in (ed.), Bühler-Studien, I, pp. 161–205.
, et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature (Manchester, 1987).Google Scholar
, The Aims of Phenomenology: The Motives, Methods, and Impact of Husserl's Thought (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
, Jacques Lacan and the Adventure of Insight: Psychoanalysis in Contemporary Culture., (Cambridge, MA, 1987)Google Scholar
, ‘Turning the screw of interpretation’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 94–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On reading poetry: reflections on the limits and possibilities of psychoanalytic approaches’, in Psychiatry and the Humanities vol. 4: ‘The literary Freud: mechanisms of defense and the poetic will’, ed. (New Haven, 1980), pp. 119–43.Google Scholar
, Le Scandale du corps parlant: Don Juan avec Austin ou La seduction en deux langues (Paris, 1980); The Literary Speech Act; Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages, trans. (Ithaca, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Reading about reading: “A Jury of Her Peers”, “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”, and “The Yellow Wallpaper'”, in and (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 147–64.Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeption contra falsches und richtiges Lesen? Oder Missverstä-nisse mit Ingarden’, Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 37 (1971)142–59.Google Scholar
, ‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 693–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham, NC, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 693–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1972).Google Scholar
, Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
, *‘Why no one's afraid of Wolfgang Iser,’ Diacritics, 11 (Spring, 1981), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 693–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘Working on the chain gang: interpretation in the law and in literary criticism’, Critical Inquiry, 9 (1982), 201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘Profession despise thyself: fear and self-loathing in literary studies’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983), 349–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Fear of Fish: a reply to Walter Davis’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1984), 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, *‘Pragmatism and literary theory I: consequences’, Critical Inquiry, 11 (1985), 433–ndash;58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘No bias, no merit: the case against blind submission’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 103 (1988), 739–48.Google Scholar
, Doing What Come Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham, NC, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Der russische Formalismus – Theorie und Wirkung’, in and (eds.), Zur Kritik115–36.
, ‘Oedipus Wrecks: Lacan, Stendhal, and the narrative form of the real’, Modern Language Notes, 98 (1983), 910–40.Google Scholar
, and , ‘The reception of literature: theory and practice of “Rezeptionsästhetik”’, in Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1977), pp. 136–64.Google Scholar
, Les mots et les choses (Paris, 1966); The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Fragments d'un discours amoureux (1977); A Lover's Discourse: Fragments, trans. (New York, 1978).Google Scholar
, Das individuelle Allgemeine: Textstrukturierung und–interpretation nach Schleiermacher (Frankfurt, 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Grenzen der Beherrschbarkeit der Sprache’, in (ed.), Text und Interpretation: Deutsch-franzüsische Debatte (Munich, 1984), pp. 181–213.Google Scholar
, Zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Literaturwissenschaft: Eine Kritik der transzendentalen Hermeneutik (Munich, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Identification, interpretation, and explanation: some problems in the philosophy of literary studies’, Poetics, 9 (1980), 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Point of view in fiction: the development of a critical concept’, PMLA, 70 (1955), 1, 160–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Critical relation: Peter Szondi's studies on Celan’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 139–67.
,, Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, 4th edn. (Tü bingen, 1972); Truth and Method, trans. and (New York, 1975); rev. by and (1989).Google Scholar
, ‘Philosophie und Literature’, in (ed.), Was ist Literatur? (Freiburg, 1981), pp. 18–45.Google Scholar
, ‘The eminent text and its truth’, in (ed.), The Horizon of Literature (Lincoln, NE, 1982), pp. 337–67.Google Scholar
, On Education, Poetry and History: Applied Hermeneutics, ed. and , trans. and (Albany, 1992).Google Scholar
, Hermeneutik, ästhetic, praktische Philosophie: Hans–Georg Gadamer im Gesprdch (Hei delberg, 1993).Google Scholar
(ed. and trans.), A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style (Washington, 1964).Google Scholar
, ‘Karl Bühler's contribution to the theory of linguistics’, The Journal of General Psychology, 75, (1966), 212–15.Google Scholar
‘Rôle des linguistes de l'Ecole de Prague dans le développment de la norme linguistique tchèque’ in and (eds.), La norme linguistique (Québec, 1983), 143–52.Google Scholar
, The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Cambridge, MA, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘LTmagination et la rêverie: remarques sur la poétique de Gaston Bachelard’, Symposium, 20 (1966)), 207–25.Google Scholar
, Die Bedeutung der Kunst: Zugänge zu einer materialen Wertästhetik, ed. and (Munich, 1976). (Collection of published and unpublished writings on aesthetics.)
, ‘Beiträge zur Phänomenologie des ästhetischen Genusses’, Jahrbuch für Philosophic und phänomenologische Forschung, 1 (1913), 567–684.Google Scholar
, Elements of Narrativics: Grammar in Narrative, Narrative in Grammar (Hamburg, 1979).Google Scholar
Genre, A symposium on Validity in Interpretation, 1, no. 3 (1968).
, The Question of Belief in Literary Criticism: An Introduction to the Hermeneutic Theory of Paul Ricoeur (Stuttgart, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers’, College English 11 (1950); rpt. in (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Les rapports texte-histoire et I'esthétique de la réception en RFA’, La Pensée, no. 233 (1983), 117–25.Google Scholar
, ‘Texte, lecture de texte et critique de “l'esthétique de la réception en RDA’, La Pensée, no. 240 (1984), 119–23.Google Scholar
, ‘The role of episodic structure and story length in children's recall of simple stories’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17 (1978), 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On concretization’, in (ed.), Language.
, Les sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure (Geneva and Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘F. de Saussure's theory oflanguage’, in Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 3, Theoretical Foundations, ed. (The Hague, 1966), pp. 479–93.Google Scholar
, ‘The domestication of Derrida’, in , , (eds.), The Yale Critics: Deconstruction in America (Minneapolis, 1983), pp.20–40.Google Scholar
, ‘Marx et l'inscription du travail’, in Tel Quel: Théorie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 188–211.Google Scholar
, ‘Narrative and the unofficial interpretive culture’, in (ed.), Reading Narrative: Form, Ethics, Ideology (Columbus, OH, 1989), pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
, ‘Culture and anarchy’, review of Is There a Text in this Class? by , New Republic, 184 (14 February, 1981), pp. 36–8.Google Scholar
, intro., ‘A symposium: hermeneutics, post-structuralism, and “objective interpretation'” Papers on Language and Literature, 17 (1981), 48–87.Google Scholar
, European Literary Theory and Practice: From Existential Phenomenology o Structuralism (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
and Joseph Courtés, ‘The cognitive dimension of narrative discourse’, New Literary History, 7 (1976), 433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Roland Barthes: une biographie à construire’, Bulletin du Groupe derecherches sémio-linguistiques, 13(1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Life, death, and language: some thoughts on Wittgenstein and Derrida’, in her Philosophy in and out of Europe (Berkeley, 1976), pp. 142–54.Google Scholar
, ‘Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning, and word meaning’, Foundations of Language, 4 (1968), 225–42.Google Scholar
‘Logic and conversation’, in and (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Volume III: Speech Acts (New York, 1975), pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeptionsgeschichte: Prämissen und Möglichkeiten historischer Darstellung,’ Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, 2 (1977).Google Scholar
(ed.), Literatur und Leser: Theorien und Modelle zur Rezeption literarischer Werke (Stuttgart, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Theory and practice of philology: reflections on the public statements of Peter Szondi’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983), 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Semantische Mehrdeutigkeit des dichterischen Textes. Zur strukturellen Analyse der Dichtung “Mai” von K. H. Mácha’, Tijdschrift voor slavische taal- en letterkunde, 1 (1972), 30–50.Google Scholar
, ‘The role of personality in literary development’, in , and (eds.), Structure, 187–210.
, ‘Deconstruction deconstructed: transformations of French logocentrist criticism in American literary theory’, Philosophische Rund schau, 33 (1986), 1–35.Google Scholar
, ‘Soziologie und Rezeptionsäk:Ügenstand nd Chancen interdisziplinäsammenarbeit’, in (ed.), Neue nsichten einer kün Germanistik (Munich, 1973)73), pp. 48–74.Google Scholar
, ‘Konsequenzen der Rezeptionsä oder Literaturwissenschaft als Kom- unikationssoziologie’, Poetica, 7 (1975), 388–413.Google Scholar
, ‘Philological understanding: a note on the writings of Peter Szondi’, Comparative Criticism, 5 (1983), 245–50.Google Scholar
, (ed.), Zeichen und Funktion. Beiträge zur ästhetischen Konzeption Jan Mukařovskýs (Munich, 1986).Google Scholar
, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. (Cambridge, MA, 1987), pp. 185–210 [the section called ‘Excursus on leveling the genre distinction between philosophy and literature’].Google Scholar
,, ‘Die Universalitätsanspruch der Hermeneutik’, in Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik (Frankfurt, 1971), pp. 120–59.Google Scholar
, ‘A review of Gadamer's Truth and Method”, in Understanding and Social Inquiry, ed. and (Notre Dame, 1977), pp. 335–63.Google Scholar
, ‘The hermeneutic claim to universality’, in Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique, ed. (London, 1970), pp. 181–211.Google Scholar
, ‘Culture, the media and the “ideology effect”’, in , and (eds.), Mass Communication and Society (London, 1977)Google Scholar
and , ‘Chaucer and the study of prosody’, College English, 28 (1966), 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding's “The Inheritors'”, in (ed.), Literary Style, pp. 330–68.
, ‘Beyond a speech-act theory of literary discourse’, Modern Language Notes, 92 (1977), 1081–98.Google Scholar
, Der russische Formalismus: Methodologische Rekonstruktion seiner Entwicklung aus dem Prinzip der Verfremdung (Vienna, 1978).Google Scholar
, Reading Saussure: A Critical Commentary on the ‘Cours de linguistique générale” (London, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The fulness and nothingness of literature’, Yale French Studies, 16 (1955), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutik’, in (ed.), Methoden–diskussion: Arbeits– buch zur Literaturwissenschaft, vol. 2 (Frankfurt, 1972), pp. 1–81.Google Scholar
, ‘Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura’ [The tasks of standard language and its culture] (1932), Studie,30–59; Eng. trans, in (ed.), Reader,; rpt. in and (eds.), Praguiana, 143–64.Google Scholar
, ‘K funkčnímu rozvrstvení spisovného jazyka’ [On functional differentiation of standard language] (1942), Studie, 60–8.Google Scholar
, ‘Letter on humanism’, in (ed.), Basic Writings of Heidegger (New York and London, 1977), pp. 193–242.Google Scholar
, ‘The end of philosophy and the task of thinking’, in Basic Writings, pp. 369–92.
, ‘The word of Nietzsche: “God is Dead”’, in (trans.), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York, 1977), pp. 51–112.Google Scholar
, Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen, 1959); On the Way to Language, trans. (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
, Bibliographic der Hermeneutik und ihre Anwendungsbereiche seit Schleiermacher (Düsseldorf, 1968).Google Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutics and the “crisis” of literature’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 24 (1984), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Entertaining commitments: a reception theory of literary genres’, Poetics, 10 (1981), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Literary theory: a compass for critics’, Critical Inquiry, 3 (1976), 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Doing, making, meaning: toward a theory of verbal practice’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 103 (1988), 749–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Althusser and the theory of ideology’, Economy and Society, 4 (1976), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Omkring sprogteoriens grundlaeggelse (Copenhagen, 1943); Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, trans. (Baltimore, 1953).Google Scholar
(ed.), Sozialgeschichte und Wirkungsäk: Dokumente zur mpirischen und marxistischen Rezeptionsforschung (Frankfurt, 1974).Google Scholar
, Roman Jakob son's Approach to Language. Phenomenological Structuralism (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
, ‘On the poetry and the plurifunctionality of language’, in (ed.), Structure and Gestalt, 1–43.
, Jakobson ou le structuralism phénoménologique (Paris, 1974); Roman Jakobson's Approach to Language: Phenomenological Structuralism, trans. and (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
, ‘The structure of understanding: structuralism versus hermeneutics’, Poetics and the Theory of Literature, 1 (1976), 223–38.Google Scholar
Poems in Persons: An Introduction to the Psychoanalysis of Literature (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
‘Unity Identity Text Self’, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90 (1975), 813–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Recovering “The Purloined Letter”: reading as a personal transaction’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 350–70.Google Scholar
‘The miller's wife and the professors: questions about the transactive theory of reading’, New Literary History, 17 (1986), 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The American reception of reception theory’, German Quarterly, 55 (1982), 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Les fonctions de la langue et de la parole’, in Travaux linguistiques de Prague, I (Prague, 1964),41–6.Google Scholar
, Three Faces of Hermeneutics: An Introduction to Current Theories of Understanding (Berkley, 1982).Google Scholar
, The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Poetics, criticism, science’, PTL – A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, (1976).Google Scholar
, Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. (Halle, 1900 and 1901); Logical Investigations, trans , 2 vols. (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie undphänomenologischen Philosophic (Halle, 1913); Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. (New York, 1931).Google Scholar
, Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie (The Hague, 1950); Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. (The Hague, 1960).Google Scholar
, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie (Bel grade, 1936); The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. (Evanston, 1970).Google Scholar
, ‘Leserrollen, Bedeutungstypen und literarische Kommunikation’, Amsterdarner Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 15 (1982), 335–49.Google Scholar
, ‘On the empirical validation of hypotheses concerning reception aesthetics’, Neohelicon, 13 (1986), 235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Reception aesthetics versus empirical research of reader's response’, Cahiers Roumains d'Etudes Littéraires, 3 (1986), 38–48.Google Scholar
Image-Music-Text. Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath (London, 1977)
, Das literarische Kunstwerk (Tübingen, 1930); The Literary Work of Art, trans. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
, Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks (Tübingen, 1968); The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, trans. and (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Revoke des Lesers order Rezeption versus Interpretation: Zu Fragen der Interpretation und der Rezeptionsästhetik’, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 3 (1974) 83–147.Google Scholar
’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
, Die Appellstruktur der Texte: Unbestimmtheit als Wirkungsbedingung iterarischer Prose (Constance, 1970); ‘Indeterminacy and the reader's response n prose fiction’, in (ed.), Aspects of Narrative: Selected Papers from he English Institute (New York, 1971)), pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
, Der implizite Lesser: Kommunkationsformen der Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett (Munich, 1972); Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to eckett (Baltimore, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘The reading process: a phenomenological approach’, in (ed.), New Directions in Literary History (Baltimore, 1974)), pp. 125–45.Google Scholar
, ‘The reality of fiction: a functionalist approach to literature’, New History, (1975), 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Der Akt des Le sens: Theorie äscher Wirkung (Munich, 1976); The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Narrative strategies as a means of communication’, in and (eds.), Interpretation of Narrative (Toronto, 1978), pp. 100–17.Google Scholar
, ‘The current situation of literary theory: key concepts and the imaginary’, New iterary History, 11 (1979), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The indeterminacy of the text: a critical reply’, Comparative Criticism, 2 (1980), 174–89.Google Scholar
, ‘Interaction between text and reader’, in and eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 106–19.Google Scholar
, ‘The interplay between creation and interpretation’, New Literary History, 15 1983/1984), 387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Changing functions of literature’, REAL: The Yearbook of Research in English nd American Studies, 3 (1985), 1–21 and in London Germanic Studies, 3 1986), 162–79.Google Scholar
, ‘Feigning in fiction’, in (eds.), Identity of he Literary Text (Toronto, 1985). 204–28.Google Scholar
, Der Akt des Lesens: Theories asthetischer Wirkung (Munich, 1976); The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Growth of the theoretical framework of modern poetics’, in (ed.), Trends, XII, 835–61.
Über den tschechischen Vers. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des russischen Verses (= Postilla Bohemica 8–10, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘Staročeský verš’ [Old Czech verse] (1934); Eng. trans, in Selected Writings (SW), VI, 417–65.Google Scholar
, ‘Randbemerkungen zur Prosa des Dichters Pasternak’ (1935); Eng. trans, in Language, 301–17.Google Scholar
, ‘Socha v symbolice Puškinově’ [The statue in Pushkin's poetic mythology] (1937); Eng. trans, in Language, 318–67.Google Scholar
, ‘On linguistic aspects of translation’, in (ed.), On Translation (Cambridge, MA, 1959), 232–39, SW, II, 260–6.Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in (ed.), Style in Language (New York, 1960), 350–77, SW, III, 18–51.Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistics and communication theory’, in Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects (Providence, RI, 1961), 245–52, SW, II, 272–9.Google Scholar
, ‘Language in operation’, in L'Aventure de l'esprit. Mélanges Alexandre Koyré (Paris, 1964), II, 269–81, SW, III, 7–17.Google Scholar
, ‘On the relation between visual and auditory signs’, in Proceedings of the AFCRL Symposium on Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form (Boston, 1967), SW, II, 338–44.Google Scholar
, ‘Efforts towards a means-ends model of language in European linguistics of the inter-war period’, in , and (eds.), Trends in Modern Linguistics (Utrecht-Antwerp, 1963), pp. 104–8.Google Scholar
, Selected Writings(SW) (The Hague–Paris–Berlin, 1962–). (vols. 3, 6–8 ed. ; vol. 5 prepared by Stephen Rudy and Martha Taylor.)Google Scholar
, ‘Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb’, SW, II, pp. 130–47.
, ‘La théorie saussurienne en rétrospection’, SW, VIII, pp. 391–435.
, Six leçons sur le son et le sens (Paris, 1976); Six Lectures on Sound and Meaning, trans. (Hassocks, Sussex, 1978).Google Scholar
, The Framework of Language (Michigan Studies in the Humanities no. 1) (Ann Arbor, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Closing statement: linguistics and poetics’, in (ed.), Style in Language (New York, 1960), pp. 350–77.Google Scholar
, ‘Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances’, in and , Fundamentals of Language (The Hague, 1956), pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
, ‘Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbance’ (1956), reprinted in Jakobson: Studies in Child Language and Aphasia, Janua Linguarum, (The Hague, 1971), pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
, ‘O zvukach stichotvornogo jazyka’, in Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka, I (Petersburg, 1916).Google Scholar
, ‘Skoplenie odinakovych plavnych v prakticeskom i poeticeskom jazykach’, ibid., II (Petersburg, 1917).Google Scholar
, ‘O poeticeskom glossemosočetanii’, in Poetika: Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka (Petersburg, 1919).Google Scholar
, The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, 1974).Google Scholar
, The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘Imaginary and Symbolic in Lacan: Marxism, psychoanalytic criticism and the problem of the subject’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 338–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Religion and ideology: a political reading of Paradise Lost’, in et al. (eds.), Literature, Politics and Theory (London, 1986), pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
, ‘Foreword’, in , The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. and [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10] (Minneapolis, 1984), pp. vii–xxi.Google Scholar
, The Ideologies of Theory, Essays 1971–1986: Volume I: Situations of Theory [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 48] (Minneapolis, 1988).Google Scholar
, Hermeneutik: Der theoretische Diskurs, die Literatur und die Konstruktion ihres Zusammenhanges in den philologischen Wissenschaften (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutik’, in and (eds.), Literaturwissen– schaft: Grundkurs 2 (Reinbeck, 1981), pp. 451–63.Google Scholar
, Literaturgeschichte als Provokation, 2nd edn (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1970), Eng. trans. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Zur Abgrenzung und Bestimmung einer literarischen Hermeneutik’, in et al. (ed.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literatur– wissenschaft (Munich, 1981), pp. 551–60.Google Scholar
‘Racines und Goethes Iphigenie: Mit einem Nachwort füe Partialitä ezeptionsäschen Methode’, Neue Hefte fur Philosophic, 4 (1973), 1–46.Google Scholar
‘Levels of identification of hero and audience’, New Literary History, 5 (1974), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Der Leser als Instanz einer neuen Geschichte der Literatur’, Poetica, 7 (1975).), 325–44.Google Scholar
‘The idealist embarrassment: observations on Marxist aesthetics’, New Literary istory, 7 (1975), 192–208.Google Scholar
‘Zur Fortsetzung des Dialogs zwischen ‘bücher’ und ‘materialistischer’ ezeptionsäk’, in (ed.), Rezeptionsäk: Theorie und raxis (Munich, 1975), pp. 343–52.Google Scholar
‘La douceur du foyer –des Jahres 1857 als Muster der Vermittlung sozialer Normen’, in (ed.), Rezeptionsäk: Theorie und Praxis Munich, 1975), pp. 401–34.Google Scholar
‘Goethes und Valéust: Zur Hemeneutik von Frage und Antwort’, omparative Literature, 28 (1976), 201–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Theses on the transition from the aesthetics of literary works to a theory f aesthetic experience’, in (eds.), nterpretation of Narrative (Toronto, 1978)pp. 137–47.Google Scholar
‘Rezeptionsäk und literarische Kommunikation’, in and (eds.), Auf dem Weg gebracht–d Wirklichkeit der Griü er Universitätanz (Konstanz 1979), pp. 387–97Google Scholar
‘Sur l'expéesthégénéral et littéraire en particulier: Entre- tien avec Charles Grivel’, Revue des science humaines, 49, no. 177 (1980), 7–21.Google Scholar
‘Die Mythe vom Siündenfall (Gen. 3): Interpretation im Lichte der literarischen Hermeneutik’, in , , and (eds.), Text und Applikation (Munich, 1980), pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
‘Zur Abgrenzung und Bestimmung einer literarischen Hermeneutik’, in Text und Applikation (Munich, 1981), pp. 459–82.Google Scholar
‘Das fragende Adam: Zur Funktion von Frage und Antwort in literarischen Tradition’, in Text und Applikation (Munich 1981), pp. 551–60.Google Scholar
‘Job's questions and their distant reply: Goethe, Nietzsche, Heidegger’, Com parative Literature, 34 (1982), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Der Gebrauch der Fiktion in Formen der Anschauung und Darstellung der Geschichte’, in , , and (eds.), Formen der Geschichtsschreibung (Munich, 1982), pp. 415–51.Google Scholar
‘Zum Problem des dialogischen Verstehens’, in (ed.), Dialogizität (Munich, 1982), pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
‘Norwid and Baudelaire as contemporaries: a notable case of overdue concreti- zation’, in , , and (eds.), The Structure of the Literary Process: Studies Dedicated to the memory of Felix Vodička (Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics, Theory and History of Literature 3 (Minneapolis, 1982).Google Scholar
Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, Theory and History of Literature 2 (Minneapolis, 1982).Google Scholar
‘Thesen zur Position Baudelaires in der ästhetischen Moderne’, Weimarer Beiträge, 31, no. 1 (1985), 15–23.Google Scholar
‘The identity of the poetic text in the changing horizon of understanding’, in and (eds.) Identity of the Literary Text (Toronto, 1985), pp. 146–74.Google Scholar
‘Die Theorie der Rezeption – Riückschau auf ihre unerkannte Vorgeschichte’, Cahiers Roumains d'Etudes Littéraires, 3 (1986), 4–20.Google Scholar
Art Social und art industriel: Funktionen der Kunst im Zeitalter des Industrialismus (Munich, 1987), 4–20.Google Scholar
Question and Answer: Forms of Dialectical Understanding, ed. and trans. (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘Should intellectual history take a linguistic turn? Reflections on the Habermas–Gadamer debate’, in and (eds.), Modern Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives (Ithaca, 1982), pp. 86–110.Google Scholar
, ‘The impact of Schleiermacher's hermeneutics on contem porary interpretation theory’, in (ed.), The Interpretation of Belief: Coleridge, Schleiermacher and Romanticism (London, 1986), pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Structuralism and posts tructuralism’, in and (eds.), Modern Literary Theory, pp. 84–112.
, ‘The Critical Difference’, in (ed.), Untying the Text (Boston and London, 1981), pp. 162–74.Google Scholar
, The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading (Baltimore, Maryland, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Poetry and performative language: Mallarmé and Austin’, in , The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 52–66.Google Scholar
, Einfache Formen: Legende, Sage, Mythe, Rätsel, Spruch, Kasus, Memorabile, Märchen, Witz (1930; 6th edn, Tubingen, 1982).Google Scholar
, Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Cambridge, MA, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘"L'Esthétique de la réception": Une Nouvelle Approche de la litterature?’, Les Lettres Romanes, 37, no. 3 (1983), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Tm Namen des Lesers: Zur Rezeptionsdebatte in der deutschen Romanistik (1965–1975)’, Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift, 60, 29 NF (1979), 1–26.Google Scholar
, An Existentialist Aesthetic: The Theories of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty (Madison, 1962).Google Scholar
, ‘Zur Typologie der Funktionen und zum Konzept eines totalen Funktionalismus’, in (ed.), Zeichen, pp. 62–95
, ‘Marxism's Althusser: towards a politics of literary theory’, Diacritics, 12, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Ourself behind ourself: a theory for lesbian readers’, in and (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
, ‘Transzendentale-hermeneutische Literaturwissenschaft’, in and (eds.), Methodische Praxis der Literaturwissenschaft (Kronberg/Ts., 1975), pp. 85–115.Google Scholar
, Beyond Hermeneutics: Zur Philosophic der Literatur– und Geisteswissen– schaften (Essen, 1985).Google Scholar
, ‘Escape into reception: the scientist and hermeneutic schools of German literary theory’, Poetics Today, 3, no. 2 (1982), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Against theory 2: hermeneutics and deconstruction’, Critical Inquiry, 14 (1987), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Against theory’, Critical Inquiry, 8 (1982), 723–42; rpt. in (ed.), Against Theory (Chicago, 1985), pp. 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Roland Barthes: an intertextual figure’, in and (eds.), Intertextuality: Theories and Practices (Manchester, 1990).Google Scholar
(ed.), Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Its Interpretation (New York, 1967).Google Scholar
, Ferdinand de Saussure: The Origin and Development of His Linguistic Thought in Western Studies of Language (Braunschweig, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Dancing through the minefield: some observations on the theory, practice, and politics of a feminist literary criticism,’ Feminist Studies, 6 (1980), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A map for rereading: or, gender and the interpretation of literary texts,’ New Literary History, 11 (1980), 451–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., (eds.), Literary Communication and Reception: Proceedings of the IXth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association (Innsbruck, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Notes on the index’, in et al. (eds.), October – The First Decade (London, 1987), pp. 2–15.Google Scholar
, Das Werk “rein für sich": Zur Geschichte des Verhältnisses von Phänomenologie, Ästhetik und Literaturwissenschaft (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
(ed.), Contemporary Literary Hermeneutics and Interpretation of Classical Texts (Ottawa, 1981).Google Scholar
, La révolution de la langage poétique (Paris, 1974); Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
, La Revolution du langage poetique (Paris, 1974); Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. , (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, trans. et al. (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘La Sémiologie: science critique ou critique de la science’, in Tel Quel Théorie d'ensemble (Paris, 1968), pp. 80–93; ‘Semiotics: a critical science and/or a critique of science’, trans. , in (ed.), The Kristeva Reader, pp. 74–88.Google Scholar
, ‘The system and the speaking subject’ (1973), reprinted in The Kristeva Reader, pp. 24–33.Google Scholar
, La Révolution du langage poeiique (Paris, 1974). Parts of this have been translated by as ‘Revolution in poetic language’ in The Kristeva Reader, pp. 89–136.Google Scholar
, ‘Pratique signifiante et mode de production’, in La Traversée des signes (Paris, 1975), pp. 11–30; ‘Signifying practice and mode of production’, trans. , Edinburgh ‘76 Magazine, 1 (1976), 64–75.Google Scholar
, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Reading the Yvain/Charrette: Chretien's inscribed audiences at Noauz and Pesme Aventure’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 19, no. 2 (1983), 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The intersubjective structure of the reading process: a communication-oriented theory of literature’, Diacritics, 10, no. 2 (1980), 47–56.Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeptions for schung: Konstanten und Varianten eines literaturwissenschaftlichen Konzepts in Theorie und Praxis’, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 3 (1974), 1–36.Google Scholar
, ‘The critical method of Gaston Bachelard’, in (ed.), Myth and Symbol (Lincoln, NE, 1963), pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
La chambre claire (1980); Camera Lucida, trans. (New York and London, 1982; Fontana edition, 1984).Google Scholar
‘La dernière des solitudes’, two interviews (1975 and 1979) by for Radio-Canada, in Revue d'esthétique, nouvelle serie, 2 (1981), 105–9.Google Scholar
La Tour Eiffel (1964). See Mythologies above.
, Ecrits (Paris, 1966). Parts of this have been translated by Alan Sheridan as Ecrits: A Selection, (London, 1977).Google Scholar
, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 11: Les Quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1973); The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. (London, 1977).Google Scholar
, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 20: Encore (Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 1: Les écrits techniques de Freud 1953–4 (Paris, 1975); Freud's Papers on Technique 1953–4, trans. and (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 2: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1978); The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954–5, trans. and (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 3: Les Psychoses (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan–texte établi par Jacques–Alain Miller: Livre 7: L'Ethique de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘Desire and the interpretation of desire in Hamlet’, Yale French Studies, 55/56 (1977), 11–52. Trans, by .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hommage fait à Marguerite Duras’, 1965, reprinted in Marguerite Duras, ed. and (Paris, 1979), pp. 131–37.Google Scholar
, Hermeneutik, Ideologiekritik, ästhetik: über Gadamer und Adorno sowie Fragen einer aktuellen ästhetik (Königstein/Ts., 1981).Google Scholar
, , Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse (Paris, 1967); The Language of Psycho-Analysis, trans. (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Vie et mort enpsychanalyse (Paris, 1970), Life and Death in Psychoanalysis, trans. (Baltimore and London, 1979).Google Scholar
L'Arc, 56 (1974).
, Critics of Consciousness: The Existential Structures of Literature (Cambridge, MA, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Event and repeatability: Ricoeur and Derrida in debate’, Pre/Text, 4 (1983), 317–34.Google Scholar
Le bruissement de la langue, Essais critiques IV (1984); The Rustle of Language, trans. (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Le degré zéro de écriture (1953); Writing Degree Zero, trans. and (London and New York, 1967).Google Scholar
Le grain de la voix. Entretiens 1962–1980 (1981); The Grain of the Voice: Interviews 1962–1980, trans. (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Le Magazine littéraire, 97 (1975).
, ‘Un tableau de Titien: un essai de Panofsky’, Critique, 29, nos. 315–16, (1973), 821–42.Google Scholar
Leçon: leçon inaugurale de la chaire de sémiologie littéraire du Colleàe de France, prononcée le 7 Janvier 1977 (1978); Inaugural Lecture; trans. , in , A Barthes Reader (1982).Google Scholar
, Literarische Hermeneutik: Eine Einführung in ihre Geschichte und Probleme (Tübingen, 1980).Google Scholar
, Kritische Wissenschaft vom Text: Manipulation. Reflexion, transparente Poetologie (Stuttgart, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), The French New Criticism: An Introduction and a Sampler (University Park, 1967).Google Scholar
, Metamorphosis des Subjekts: Hermeneutische Reaktionen auf die (post–) strukturalistische Herausforderung (Frankfurt, 1987).Google Scholar
, Anthropologic structurale (Paris, 1958): Structural Anthropology, trans. and (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
, ‘The structural study of myth’ Journal of American Folklore, 78 (1955), 428–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘La structure et la forme. Réflexions sur un ouvrage de Vladimir Propp’, Cahiers de l’Institut de Science économique appliquée, serie M, 7 (1960), 3–36.Google Scholar
, ‘Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenology of language’, Yale French Studies, 36–37 (1966)), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Proximity, Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille, and Consciousness (The Hague, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘La place de Roman Jakobson dans la vie littéraire et artistique Tchécoslovaque’, in and (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 219–35.
, ‘"Die Appellstruktur der Texte” und “ein Paradigmawechsel in der Literaturwissenschaft'”, Jarhbuch der deutschen Schillergesellschaft, 17 (1973), 532–83.Google Scholar
L‘esprit créateur (1982).
, The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'obvie et Vobtus, Essais critiques III (1982); The Responsibility of Forms: Critical Essays on Music, Art and Representation, trans. (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature (London, 1977)Google Scholar
, Analiz poètičeskogo teksta (Leningrad, 1972); Analysis of the Poetic Text, trans. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1976).Google Scholar
, ‘Jane Austen and gentry society’, in et al. (eds.), Literature, Society and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977), pp. 118–32.Google Scholar
, ‘The social relations of cultural production: absent centre of a new discourse’, in One–Dimensional Marxism, ed. , (London, 1980), pp. 232–56.Google Scholar
, La Condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir (Paris, 1979); The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. and [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10] (Minneapolis, 1984).Google Scholar
and , Au Juste (Paris, 1979); Just Gaming [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 20], trans. (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
, Pour une theorie de la production litteraire (Paris, 1966); A Theory of Literary Production, trans. (London, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Problems of reflection’ in et al. (eds.), Literature, Society and the Sociology of Literature (Colchester, 1977), pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
, ‘An Interview with Pierre Macherey’, trans, and ed. and , Red Letters, 5 (1977), 3–9.Google Scholar
, and , ‘Sur la littérature comme forme idéologique’, Littérature, 13 (1974), 29–48; reprinted as preface to , Les Francais fictifs (Paris, 1974); ‘On Literature as an ideological form; trans. , and , in (ed.), Untying the Text, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
et al., ‘Marxism and deconstruction: symposium at the conference on contemporary genre theory and the Yale School, 1 June 1984’, in and (eds.), Rhetoric and Form: Deconstruction at Yale (Norman, OK, 1985), pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
, and (eds.), The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy (Baltimore, 1970) rpt. 1972 as The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man).Google Scholar
, ‘How to be persuasive in literary theory: the case of Wolfgang Iser’, Centrum, n.s., 1 (1981), 65–73.Google Scholar
, Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
, Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction (Ithaca, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Wirkungsästhetik’, Jahrbuch für Internationale Germanistik, 2 (1970), 71–84.Google Scholar
‘Rezeptionsästhetik und marxistische Literaturtheorie’, in (ed.), Historizität in Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft (Munich, 1974), pp. 379–88.Google Scholar
(ed.), ‘Schleiermacher among the theorists of language and interpretation’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 45 (1987), 361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philosophy Looks at the Arts: Contemporary Readings in Aesthetics (Philadelphia, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The logic and structures of fictional narrative’, Philosophy and Literature, 7 (1983), 168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Textstrukturen aus rezeptionsästhetischer Sicht. Perspektiven einer Textästhetik auf der Grundlage des Prager Strukturalismus’, Wirkendes Wort, 25 (1973), 359–79.Google Scholar
, ‘The hermeneutic circle and the art of interpretation’ Comparative Literature 24 (1972), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Interpretation, modern’, in (ed.), Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (Princeton, 1974), pp. 943–7, pp. 943–7.Google Scholar
, ‘Austin, art, and anxiety’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29 (1970), 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Paul Ricoeur's theory of interpretation: some implications for critical inquiry in art education’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 16 (1982), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views (Cambridge, MA, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘Postscript: Prague School semiotics’, in and (eds.), Semiotics of Art. Prague School Contributions (Cambridge, MA, 1976), pp. 265–98.Google Scholar
(ed.), Sound, Sign and Meaning. Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle (Ann Arbor, MI, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘The roots of Russian semiotics of art’, in , and (eds.) The Sign, pp. 146–72.
‘Deset let Pražskeho linguistickeℏo kroužku’ [Ten years of the Prague Linguistic Circle] (1936), qtd. from Eng. trans, in , The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966).Google Scholar
, ‘Classic statements of the semiotic theory of art: Mukařovský and Morris’, in (ed.), Sound, pp. 425–32.
, Meaning in Texts: The Historical Shaping of a Narrative Hermeneutics (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar
(attributed to M. Bakhtin), The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics, trans. (Cambridge, MA, 1985).Google Scholar
, ‘Trimethylamin: notes on Freud's specimen dream’, in (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post–Structuralist Reader (London, 1981), pp. 177–88.Google Scholar
, ‘Baudelaire and the City: 1848 and the inscription of Hegemony’, in et al. (eds), Literature, Politics and Theory (London, 1986), 17–34.Google Scholar
, ‘The semantic gesture and the guinea pigs’, in et al. (eds.), Voz'mi na radosf. To Honour Jeanne van der Eng-liedmeier (Amsterdam, 1980)1980), pp. 309–22.Google Scholar
, Ph7eacute;noménologie de la perception (Paris, 1945); Phenomenology of Perception, trans. (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
, ‘Le Primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques’, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, 41 (1947), 119–53.Google Scholar
, The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
, Le Visible et l'invisible: suivi de notes de travail (Paris, 1964); The Visible and the Invisible, trans. (Evanston, 1968).Google Scholar
, From Prague to Paris. A Critique of Structuralist and Post-structuralist Thought (London, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘Zur phänomenologischenÄsthetik Moritz Geigers’, Studia Philosophica, 28 (1968), 68–92.Google Scholar
, Le signifiant imaginaire. Psychanalyse et cinéma (1984); Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, The Imaginary Signifier, trans. , , and (London, 1982).Google Scholar
, Le Signifiant imaginaire (Paris, 1977); Psychoanalysis and Cinema: The Imaginary Signifier (London, 1982).Google Scholar
The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James, and Benjamin (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The literary criticism of Georges Poulet’, Modern Language Notes, 78 (1963), 471–88.Google Scholar
‘The Geneva School: the criticism of Marcel Raymond, Albert Béguin, Georges Poulet, Jean Rousset, Jean-Pierre Richard, and Jean Starobinski’, Critical Quarterly, 8 (1966)), 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Geneva or Paris: the recent work of Georges Poulet’, University of Toronto Quarterly, 39 (1970), 212–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘But are things as we think they are?’ Times Literary Supplement (9–15 October 1987), 1104–5.Google Scholar
, Dostoevsky and The Idiot: Author, Narrator, and Reader (Providence, MA, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Einfluss- und Rezeptions for schung’, in (ed.), Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft: Theorie und Praxis (Wiesbaden, 1981), PP. 49–72.Google Scholar
, The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer and the Traditions of Literary Utopia (Austin, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘La Terminologie françhise des études de réception’, Oeuvres … Critiques, 11 (1986), 143–5.Google Scholar
, A Recent Imagining: Interviews with Harold Bloom, Geoffrey Hartman, J. Hillis Miller, Paul de Man (Hamden, CN, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘Slovak theory of literary communication: notes on the Nitra school of literary criticism’, PTL – A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 4 (1979), 371–84.Google Scholar
, Máchuv Máj. Estetická studie [Maácha's May. An aesthetic study] (1928), Kapitoly, III, 7–201.
, ‘Jazyk spisovný a jazyk básnický’ [Standard language and poetic language], in and (eds.), Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura (Prague, 1932), 123–56; Eng. trans, (part) in , Reader17–30.Google Scholar
, ‘Obecné zaásady a vývoj novocečeského verše’ [General principles and evolution of modern Czech verse] (1934), Kapitoly, II, 9–90.Google Scholar
, ‘Polákova Vznešenost přfrody’ [Polák's Sublimity of Nature] (1934), Kapitoly, II 91–176.Google Scholar
, ‘K českému překladu Šklovského Teorie prózy’ [A note on the Czech translation of Shklovsky's Theory of Prose] (1934), Kapitoly, I, 344–50; Eng. trans. in and (eds.), Word, 134–42;Google Scholar
, ‘L'Art comme fait sémiologique’, in Actes du huitième Congrès international de philosophic (Prague, 1936), 1065–72; , in Studie zestetiky; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Structure, 82–8.Google Scholar
, Estetická funkce, norma a hodnota jako sociálmífakty (1936), Studie z estetiky, 17–54; Eng. trans. Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts (Ann Arbor, MI, 1970).Google Scholar
, ‘K problému funkci v architektuře’ [On the problem of functions in architecture] (1937/1938), Studie z estetiky; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Structure.Google Scholar
, ‘Dénomination poétique et la fonction esthétique de la langue’, in et al. (eds.), Actes du IVe Congrès international des linguistes (Copenhagen, 1936), 98–104; Czech trans, in Kapitoly, I 157–63; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Word, 65–73.Google Scholar
, ‘Genetika smyslu v Máchově poesii’ [Genesis of sense in Mácha's poetry] (1938), Kapitoly, III, 239–310.Google Scholar
, ‘Nové nèmecké dílo o základech literárni vědy’ [A new German work on the foundations of the science of literature] (1939), Studie z poetiky, 337–46.Google Scholar
, ‘Strukturalismus v estetice a ve vědě o literatuře’ [Structuralism in aesthetics and in the science of literature] (1939/1940), Kapitoly, II, 13–28; Eng. trans. (ed.), Prague School, 65–82.Google Scholar
, ‘Ojazyce básnickém’ [On poetic language] (1940), Kapitoly, I, 78–128; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Word, 1–64.Google Scholar
, ‘Dialog a monolog’ [Dialogue and monologue] (1940), Kapitoly, I, 129–53; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Word, 81–112.Google Scholar
, ‘Básník’ [The poet] (1941), Studie z estetiky, 144–52; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Word, 143–60.Google Scholar
, ‘Mfísto estetické funkce mezi ostatními’ [The place of the aesthetic function among the other functions] (1942), Studie z estetiky, 65–73; Eng. trans. in and (eds.), Structure, 31–48.Google Scholar
, ‘Význam estetiky’ [The significance of aesthetics] (1942), Studie z estetiky, 55–61; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Structure17–30.Google Scholar
, ‘O strukturalismu’ [On structuralism] (1946), Studie z estetiky, 109–16; Eng. trans, in and (eds.), Structure, 3–16.Google Scholar
, ‘K pojmosloví československé teorie uměni’ [On the conceptural system of the Czechoslovak theory of art] (1947), Kapitoly, I,29–40.Google Scholar
, ‘Psychosis and mourning in Lacan's Hamlet’, New Literary History, 12 (1980), 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Understanding and interpretation: toward a definition of literary hermeneutics’, Yearbook of Comparative Criticism, 10 (1983, 41–77).Google Scholar
, ‘The conflict between poetry and literature’, Philosophy and Literature, 9 (1985), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mythologies (1957); a selection of Mythologies, trans. (London and New York, 1972). The other original essays except ‘Astrologie’ and five new essays were translated by Richard Howard as The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Text, history and the critical subject: notes on Peter Szondi's theory and praxis of hermeneutics’, Boundary 2, 11 (1983, 29–51).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Narrative macro-structures: logical and cognitive foundations’, PTL, 1 (1976), 547–68.Google Scholar
, ‘Literary production and reception’, New Literary History, 8 (1976), 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Bemerkungen zur Literaturrezeption als geschichtliches und gesellschaftliches Ereignis’, in and (eds.), Komparatistik: Theoretische UÜberlegungen und südosteuropäische Wechselseitigkeit. Festschrift fur Zoran Konstantinovic (Heidelberg, 1981), pp. 159–68.Google Scholar
et al., Gesellschaft – Literatur – Lesen: Literaturrezeption in theoretischer Sicht (Weimar, 1973).Google Scholar
Poetik und Hermeneutik: Arbeitsergebnisse einer Forschungsgruppe, Fink, Miünchen, 1964 ff.Google Scholar
New Literary History, ‘On interpretation I’, 3, no. 2 (1972); ‘On interpretation II’, 4, no. 2 (1973); ‘Literary hermeneutics’, 10, no. 1 (1978).
, ‘Schumann and late eighteenth century narrative strategies’, 9th-Century Music, 9 (1987), 164–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Paul de Man, Deconstruction and the Critique of Aesthetic Ideology (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
, ‘"That the truest philosophy is the most feigning": Austin on the margins of literature’, in The Deconstructive Turn: Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosophy (London, 1983), pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
, ‘Teleology and taxonomy in critical explanation’, Bucknell Review, 26, no. 1 (1981), 102–27.Google Scholar
Nouveaux essais critiques, collected with Le degré zéro de Vécriture (1972); New Critical Essays, trans. (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
(ed.), Language, Literature and Meaning, I – Problems of Literary Theory (Amsterdam, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Speech acts and definition of literature’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 4 (1971), 1–19.Google Scholar
, ‘Instrumental style: notes on the theory of speech as action’, in and (eds.), Current Trends in Stylistics (Champaign, IL, 1972). PP. 115–41.Google Scholar
, ‘Speech, literature, and the space between,’ New Literary History, 4 (1972), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The writer's audience is always a fiction,’ Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90 (1975), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Receptions-aesthetics as a tool in literary criticism and historiography’, Language Quarterly, 21, no. 3–4 (1983), 35–36, 52.Google Scholar
, ‘Paradox and negation in the criticism of Maurice Blanchot’, Symposium, 16 (1962)), 36–44.Google Scholar
, Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer (Evanston, 1969).Google Scholar
‘Phenomenology as foundation for a post–modern philosophy of literary inter pretation’, Cultural Hermeneutics, 1 (1973), 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Toward a postmodern hermeneutics of performance’, in and (eds.), Performance in Post–modern Culture (Madison, 1977), 19–32.Google Scholar
‘Postmodern hermeneutics and the act of reading’, Religion and Literature, 15 (1983), 55–84.Google Scholar
Paragraph, 11, Nos 2 and 3 (July, November 1988).
, Theoriebildung in der Literaturwissenschaft: Einführung in Grund– fragen des Interpretationspluralismus (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
, Les Vérités de la Palice (Paris, 1975); Language, Semantics and Ideology: Stating the Obvious, trans. (London, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Bibliography of hermeneutics: literary and biblical interpretation’, Comparative Criticism, 5 (1983), 347–56.Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Audience Oriented Criticism and the Classics, Special Issue of Arethusa, 19, no. 2 (1986).Google Scholar
Peinture du signe, Maison Descartes (Amsterdam, 1982).
, Collected Papers, ed. , , and , 8 vols., Vols. 1–6 (Cambridge, MA, 1931–1935), vols. 7–8 (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar
, ‘Castration, speech acts, and the realist difference: S/Z versus Sarrasine’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 102 (1987), 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Reading People, Reading Plots: Character, Progression, and the Interpretation of Narrative (Chicago, 1989).Google Scholar
(ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Poétique, 47 (1981).
, ‘Po povodu “zvukovych zestov” japonskogo jazyka’, Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka (Petersburg, 1916), I.Google Scholar
, ‘Roman Jakobson and the new poetics’, in and (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 363–78.
et al. (eds.), Language, Poetry and Poetics. The Generation of the 1890s: Jakobson, Trubeckoj, Majakovskij (Proceedings of the First Roman Jakobson Colloquium) (Berlin, 1987).Google Scholar
‘Perspectives du structuralisme’, Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VIII (1939), 71–8.Google Scholar
, Etudes sur le temps humain (Edinburgh, 1949); Studies in Human Time, trans. (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar
, La Distance intérieure: Etudes sur le temps humain II (Paris, 1952); The Interior Distance, trans. (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar
, Les Métemorphoses du cercle (Paris, 1961); The Metamorphoses of the Circle, trans. and (Baltimore, 1967).Google Scholar
, ‘Poulet on Poulet: the self and the other in critical consciousness’, Diacritics, 2, no. 1 (1971), 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, La poésie éclatée: Baudelaire, Rimbaud (Paris, 1980); Exploding Poetry: Baudelaire, Rimbaud, trans. (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Bachelard et la critique contemporaine’, in Currents of Thought in French Literature (Oxford, 1965)1965), pp. 353–7.Google Scholar
, ‘Interpretive strategies/strategic interpretations: on Anglo-American reader response criticism,’ Boundary 2, 11 (1981/1982), 201–31.Google Scholar
Pre/text, 4, nos. 3–4 (1983) (Ricoeur and Rhetoric).
, La Force du dehors: extériorité, limit et nonpouvoir à partir de Maurice Blanchot (Fontenay-sous-Bris, 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Introduction à l'étude du narrataire,’ Poetique no. 14 (1973); rpt. as ‘Introduction to the Study of the Narratee’, trans. , in (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 7–25.Google Scholar
, ‘Notes on the text as reader’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 225–40.Google Scholar
, Příspěvek k problematice sémiologie literatury a umění [A Contribution to the semiology of literature and art] (Prague, 1969).Google Scholar
, review of Is There a Text in This Class? by , Journal of Aesthetic Education, 17 (1983), 123–25.
, ‘Truth in fiction: a reexamination of audiences’, Critical Inquiry, 4 (1977)), 121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘"What's Hecuba to Us?: the audience's experience of literary borrowing,’ in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 241–63.Google Scholar
‘Circumstantial evidence: musical analysis and theories of reading’, Mosaic, 18, no. 4 (1985), 159–73.Google Scholar
Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The magnetism between reader and text: prolegomena to a Lacanian poetics’, Poetics, 13 (1984), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutics and literary research’, in and (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, II (Stuttgart, 1980), pp. 605–9.Google Scholar
, De Baudelaire au surréalisme (Paris, 1933); From Baudelaire to Surrealism (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
, ‘De l'irrecevabilité de l'esthétique de la réception mais encore’ Revue des Sciences Humaines, 1, no. 189 (1983), 159–180.Google Scholar
, ‘But that was in another ball park: a reply to Stanley Fish’, Critical Inquiry, 6 (1979). 164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Roman Jakobson and the Prague school’, in and (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 379–89.
‘Réponses’, Tel Quel, 47 (Autumn, 1971),89–107. An interview by in a special issue on Barthes. Essential reading.Google Scholar
, ‘Review of An Introduction to Literary Semiotics by Maria Cort and The Role of the Reader by Umberto Eco’, Clio, 10 (1980), 93–5.Google Scholar
Revue d'esthétique, 2 (1981). Special issue on Sartre and Barthes.
, De L'interprétation: essai sur Freud (Paris, 1965); Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, trans. (New Haven, 1970).Google Scholar
, Le Conflit des interprétation (Paris, 1969); The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, trans. (Evanston, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’, Philosophy Today, 17 (1973), 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Ethics and culture: Habermas and Gadamer in dialogue’, Philosophy Today, 17 (1973)> 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Philosophical hermeneutics and theological hermeneutics’, Studies in Religion, 5 (1975), 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Writing as a problem for literary criticism and philosophical hermeneutics’, Philosophical Exchange, 2 (1977), 3–15.Google Scholar
, ‘Constructing and constructing, Book Review: E. D. Hirsch, Jr., The Aims of Interpretation’, The Times Literary Supplement, 197 (25 February 1977), 216.Google Scholar
, ‘On interpretation’, in (ed.), Philosophy in France Today (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 175–97.Google Scholar
, ‘Narrative and hermeneutics’, in (ed.), Essays on Aesthetics: Perspec tives on the Work of Monroe C. Beardsley (Philadelphia, 1983), 149–60.Google Scholar
, Temps et récit, 3 vols. (Paris, 1983–1985); Time and Narrative, trans. and (Chicago, 1984–1988).Google Scholar
, ‘The Text as dynamic identity’, in (ed.), Identity of the Literary Text (Toronto, 1985), pp. 175–86.Google Scholar
, Essais de stylistique structurale (Paris, 1971). Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Describing poetic structures: two approaches to Baudelaire's “Les chats'”, Yale French Studies 36–7 (1966). 200–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland Barthes, 1915–1980 (1990)
Roland Barthes: le texte et Vimage, Pavilion des Arts (1986). Incidents (1987).
, ‘The higher nominalism in a nutshell: a reply to Henry Staten’, Critical Inquiry, 12 (1986), 462–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Pragmatism, Davidson and truth’, in (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford, 1986), PP 333–55.Google Scholar
, ‘Two senses of “logocentrism": a reply to Norris’, in (ed.), Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory (Minneapolis, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘Is Derrida a transcendental philosopher?’, Yale Journal of Criticism, 2 (April, 1989), 207–17.Google Scholar
, ‘The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy,’ Language in Society, 11 (1982), 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The limits of interpretation’, in (ed.), Literature and the Question of Philosophy (Baltimore, 1987), pp. 213–41.Google Scholar
The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work (Providence, IL, 1978).Google Scholar
, L'Intérieure et l'extérieure: Essais sur la poésie et sur le théâtre du XVIIe siécle (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutik’, in and (eds.), Grundziüge der Literature- und Sprach-wissenschaft, vol. 1 (Munich, 1973), pp. 89–105.Google Scholar
, ‘Sur les notions de texte et de lecture dans une théorie de la réception’, Revue des Sciences Humaines, 49, no. 177 (1980), 67–83.Google Scholar
‘The modal structure of narrative universes’, Poetics Today, 6 (1985), 717–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Labyrinth of incarnations: the essays of Maurice Merleau- Ponty’, Kenyon Review, 29 (1967), 54–68.Google Scholar
, Cours de linguistique générale, (1916) ed. and ; critical edition prepared by (Paris, 1972). (Pagination identical with earlier editions from the same publisher.) Cours de linguistique générale (Critical edn), ed. , 2 vols. (Wiesbaden, 1967–1974).Google Scholar
, Course in General Linguistics, ed. and in collaboration with , trans. (1959; rpt. Glasgow, 1974). , Protocols of Reading (New Haven, CT, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘Mukařovský (1891–1975)’, in (ed.), Klassiker der Literaturtheorie (Munich, 1979), pp. 238–50.Google Scholar
, ‘On some problems in the semiotics of visual art: field and vehicle in image-signs’, Semiotica, 1 (1969) 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Words and Pictures: On the Literal and the Symbolic in the Illustration of a Text (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Recent German contributions to literary theory’, in Société des Anglicistes de l’nseignment Supérieur. Echanges: Actes du Congrès de Strasbourg (Paris, 1982), pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
, ‘Applikationsverständnis der literarischen Hermeneutik’, in et al. (eds.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literaturwissenschaft (Munich, 1981), pp. 577–8.Google Scholar
, Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts by F. D. Schleiermacher, ed. , trans. and (Missoula, 1977).Google Scholar
, Wirkungsästhetische Analysen: Poetologie und Prosa in der neueren DDR-Literatur (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Zum Begriff der ästhetischen Konkretisation im tschechischen Strukturalismus’, Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 36 (1970), 290–318.Google Scholar
, ‘Der Funktionsbegriff des tschechischen Strukturalismus in der Theorie und in der literaturwisseschaftlichen Analyse am Beispiel von Havel's Horský hotel’, in , and (eds.), Structure, pp. 455–81.
, ‘Die “semantische Geste” als Schlüsselbegriff des Proger literaturwissenschaft-lichen Strukturalismus’, in (ed.), Schwerpunkte der Literaturwissenschajt (Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 209–59.Google Scholar
, Abbild, Sinnbild, Wertung: Aufsätze zur Theorie und Praxis literarischer Kommunikation (Berlin, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Réception et historicité de la littérature’, Revue des science humaines, 60, no. 189 (1983), 8–20.Google Scholar
, Rettende Kritik und antizipierte Utopie. Zur geschichtlichen Gehalt-ästhetischen Erfahrung in den Theorien von J an Mukařovský, Walter Benjamin und Theodor W. Adorno (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘Reading ourselves: toward a feminist theory of reading,’ in and (eds.), Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts (Baltimore, 1986), pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
, ‘Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts,’ Philosophical Review, 77 (1968), 405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Karl Bühler: a neglected figure in the history of semiotic inquiry’, in The Play of Musement (Bloomington, 1981), pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
, ‘The semiotic web: a chronicle of prejudices’, Bulletin of Literary Semiotics, 2 (1975), 1–65; 3 (1975), 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Readers, text and author: some implications of Rezeptions as thetik’, Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature, 24 (1975), 15–24.Google Scholar
‘An interview with Hans Robert Jauss’, New Literary History, 11 (1979), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘La Determination idéologique du lecteur: A Propos de la nécessité de la collaboration entre la sémiotique et l'esthétique de la réception’, Degrés, 24–25 (1980–1981), h1–h14.Google Scholar
, ‘Semiology and Rhetoric’, in (ed.), Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-structuralist Criticism (London, 1980), pp. 121–40.Google Scholar
, review of Subjective Criticism by , Criticism, 21 (1979), p. 153
, ‘Zaumnyj jazyk i poezija’, Sborniki po teorii po`tičeskogo jazyka. I (Petersburg, 1916).Google Scholar
, ‘Art as technique’, in and (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism (Lincoln, NE, 1965), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
, ‘Sterne's Tristram Shandy: stylistic commentary’, in and (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism, pp. 25–57.
, ‘Lotman: the dialectic of a semiotician’, in , and (eds.), The Sign, pp. 194–206.
(ed.), Modern French Criticism: From Proust and Valeéy to Structuralism (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘The formalization of Husserl's theory of wholes and parts’, in (ed.), Parts, pp. 113–59
, ‘Kodaňský strukturalismus a “Pražská sǩola'” [Copenhagen Structuralism and the ‘Prague School'], Slovo a slovesnost, 10 (1947/1948), 135–42.Google Scholar
, ‘Motives, intentions, and the interpretation of texts’, New Literary History, 3 (1971–1972), 321–42.Google Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutics and the role of history’, New Literary History, 7 (1975), 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Motives, intentions and the interpretation of texts’, New Literary History, 3 (1972), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hermeneutics and the role of history’, New Literary History, 7 (1975), 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Structure and Gestalt: Philosophy and Literature in Austria-Hungary and Her Successor States (Amsterdam, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Pieces of a theory’, in (ed.), Parts, pp. 15–109.
, ‘Narrative versions, narrative theories’, in (ed.), On Narrative (Chicago, 1981), pp. 209–32.Google Scholar
, Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory (Cambridge, MA, 1988), pp. 116–24 (a section called ‘Changing places: truth, error and deconstruction’).Google Scholar
, On the Margins of Discourse: The Relation of Literature to Language (Chicago, 1978).Google Scholar
, and , ‘Rezeptions as thetik’, in and (eds.) Literaturwissenschaft heute (Munich, 1979), 154–96.Google Scholar
, Some Aspects of Text Grammars: A Study in Theoretical Linguistics and Poetics (The Hague, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. (eds.), Funktion und Wirkung: Soziologische Untersuchungen zur Literatur und Kunst (Berlin, 1978).Google Scholar
, review of Fish et al, Modern Fiction Studies, 27 (1981), 753–58.
, Martin Heidegger and the Question of Literature: Towards a Postmodern Literary Hermeneutics (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
‘Towards a fallen poetics: talking on the measure of occasion’, in (ed.), Coherence (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 201–8.Google Scholar
, The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 3rd rev. edn (The Hague, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft. Stilforschung, Rhetorik, Textlinguistik (Stuttgart, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘Meaning and truth in the theory of speech acts’, in and (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Volume III: Speech Acts (New York, 1975), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
, ‘Structural poetics and linguistics’, in (ed.), Trends, XII, pp. 629–59.
, ‘Roman Jakobson: teacher and scholar’, in A Tribute to Roman Jakob son, 1896–1982 (Berlin, 1983), pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
, Die typischen Erzählsituationen im Roman daroestellt an ‘Tom Jones’, ‘Moby Dick’, ‘The Ambassadors’, ‘Ulysses’ (Vienna, 1955).Google Scholar
, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la transparence et l'obstacle (Paris, 1957); Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction, trans. (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar
, ‘Consideration on the present state of literary criticism’, Diogenes, 74 (1971), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On the fundamental gestures of criticism’, New Literary History, 5 (1974), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds. and trans.), The Word and Verbal Art. Selected Essays by Jan Mukaíovský (New Haven, 1977).Google Scholar
‘Theèses présentées au Premier Congrès des philologues slaves’, in Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, I (Prague, 1929), 7–29; Eng. trans, in (ed.), Prague School3–31.Google Scholar
, ‘The conceptual basis of Prague structuralism’, in (ed.), Sound, pp. 351–85.
, and (eds.), The Structure of the Literary Process.CrossRef
, and Wendy Steiner, ‘The axes of poetic language’, in (ed.), Language, pp. 35–70.
, ‘Modern American semiotics’, in , and (eds.), The Sign, pp. 99–118.
, Pictures of Romance: Form against Context in Painting and Literature (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar
, ‘Perlocutionary acts and the interpretation of literature,’ Centrum, 3 (1975), 112–16.Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeption und Interpretation: Versuch einer Abgrenzung’, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, 3 (1974), 37–81.Google Scholar
, Gestalt, Ganzheit, Struktur. Aus Vor- und Frühgeschichte des Strukturalismus in Deutschland (Göttingen, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘But is it life? some thoughts on modern critical theory’, Modern Language Studies, 14, no. 3 (1984), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Text als Handlung: Perspektiven einer systematischen Literaturwissen- schaft (Munich, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘The reading of fictional texts’, in and (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980), pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
: ‘The horrors of power: a critique of Kristeva’, in The Politics of Theory, ed. et al. (Colchester, 1983), pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
, ‘Women's words as weapons: speech as action in “The Wife's Lament'”, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 23 (1981), 268–85.Google Scholar
‘Intention and convention in speech acts’, Philosophical Review, 73 (1964), 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Einleitung’ to , Die Struktur der literarischen Entwick-lung, ed. et al. (Munich, 1976), pp. vii–ciii.Google Scholar
, Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Cambridge, MA, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studien zur Entwicklung einer materialen Hermeneutik (Munich, 1979).
, ‘Reading Robbe-Grillet: sadism and text in Projet pour une revolution à New York’, Romanic Review, 68 (1977), 43–62.Google Scholar
and , eds., The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Political Hermeneutics: The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer (University Park, 1989).Google Scholar
Sur la littérature (dialogue with Maurice Nadeau) (Grenoble, 1980).
, ‘On the genetic preconditions of Czech structuralist semiology and semantics. An essay on Czech and German thought’, Poetics, 4 (1972), 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Theoretical poetics in the twentieth century’, in (ed.), Trends, XII, pp. 863–941.
, On Textual Understanding and Other Essays, trans. , Theory and History of Literature 15 (Manchester, 1986).Google Scholar
Tel Quel, 47 (Autumn 1971).
, ‘Reading Wolfgang Iser or responding to a theory of response’, Comparative Literature Studies, 19 (1982), 54–66.Google Scholar
, Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jiürgen Habermas (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Qu'est-ce que le structuralisme: Poétique (Paris, 1968); Introduction to Poetics, trans. (Minneapolis, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘The birth of occidental semiotics’, in , and (eds.), The Sign, pp. 1–42.
, ‘A marvellous chemical laboratory …. and its deeper meaning: notes on Roman Jakobson and the Czech avant-garde between the two wars’, in et al. (eds.), Language, pp. 313–46.
, Teorija literatury. Po`tika [Theory of Literature. Poetics], 4th edn (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar
, ‘An introduction to reader-response criticism’, in (ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980), pp. ix–xxvi.Google Scholar
Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790–1860 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
(ed.), Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistics and the ideological structure of the period’, qtd. from Eng. trans, in Vachek, The Linguistic School of Prague (Bloomington, 1966), pp. 152–65.Google Scholar
, ‘Wahrheit oder Methode? H. G. Gadamers “Grundziüge einer Philosophischen Hermeneutik”’, in (ed.), Hermeneutische Positionen (Göttingen, 1982).Google Scholar
, Die literarischen Kunstmittel und die Evolution der Literatur, trans. (Frankfurt, 1967).Google Scholar
, Das Problem der Verssprache: Zur Semantik des poetischen Textes, trans. (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar
, A Poetics of Composition: The Structure of the Artistic Text and Typology of a Compositional Form, trans. and (Berkeley, 1973).Google Scholar
and (eds.), Praguiana. Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistics (Amsterdam, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Karl Bühler und die Prager Linguistenschule’, in (ed.), Bühler-Studien, II, pp. 247–53.
, Shadows in the Cave: A Phenomenological Approach to Literary Criticism Based on Hispanic Texts (Toronto, 1982).Google Scholar
‘Gadamer and Kant: the critique of modern aesthetic consciousness’, Interpretation, 9 (1981), 353–64.Google Scholar
, ‘Jan Mukařfovský;'s structural poetics and aesthetics’, Poetics Today, 2 (1980/1981), 117–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Poetika, lingvistika, sociologija: Metodologiceskaja spravka’, Lef 3 (1923), 104–13.Google Scholar
, Visible language, 11, no. 4 (1977).
, ‘Problematika ohlasu Nerudova dila’ [Problems of the echo of Neruda's work] (1941), Struktura, 193–219; Eng. trans, in (ed.), Prague School103–34.Google Scholar
, ‘Literární historic Její problémy a úkoly’ [Literary history. Its problems and tasks] (1942), Struktura, 13–53; Eng. trans, (part) in and (eds.), Semiotics, 197–208.Google Scholar
, Počátky krásné prózy novocěeské [The beginnings of Czech artistic prose] (Prague, 1948).Google Scholar
, ‘The integrity of the literary process: notes on the development of theoretical thought in J. Mukřfovský's work’, Poetics, 4 (1972), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Metastructuralismo. Poética moderna, semiotica narrativa y filosojia de las ciencias sociales (Madrid, 1985).Google Scholar
(attributed to ), Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. and (Cambridge, MA, 1986).Google Scholar
, Marksizm i jilosofija jazyka:Osnovnye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda v nauke ojazyke (Leningrad, 1929); Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. and (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
, Das Verstehen: Grundziüge einer Geschichte der nermeneutischen Theorie im 19. Jahrhundert, 3 vols. (Tübingen, 1926ü1933).Google Scholar
, ‘Literary art and linguistic meaning’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 12 (1972). 32l–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Gendered Interventions: Narrative Discourse in the Victorian Novel (New Brunswick, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘Rezeptionsästhetik als literaturwissenschaftliche Pragamatik’, in (ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis (Munich, 1975), pp. 9–41.Google Scholar
, ‘The poetic function and the nature of language’, in and (eds.), Roman Jakobson. Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time (Minneapolis, 1985), pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
, ‘Saussure and the apparition oflanguage: the critical perspective’, Modern Language Notes, 91 (1976), 913–38.Google Scholar
, ‘Caught in the act of reading’, in (ed.), Demarcating the Disciplines: Philosophy Literature Art, Glyph Textual Studies 1 (Minneapolis, 1986), pp. 181–214.Google Scholar
, ‘The debt of criticism: notes on Stanley Fish's Is There a Text in This Class?’, in Institution and Interpretation [Theory and History of Literature, Volume 31] (Minneapolis, 1987), pp. 33–9.Google Scholar
, ‘"Rezeption sästhetik” oder das Ungenügen an der bürgerlichen Bildung: Zur Kritik einer Theorie literarischer Kommunikation’, in Kunstensemble und Öffentlichkeit (Halle-Leipzig, 1982), pp. 85–133.Google Scholar
, Historische Einleitung zur literaturwissenschaftlichen Hermeneutik (Tuübingen, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘"London” and the fundamental problem of hermeneutics’, Critical Inquiry, 9 (1982), 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The theory of literary history’, in Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VI (Prague, 1936), 173–91.Google Scholar
, The Literary Theory and Aesthetics of the Prague School (Ann Arbor, MI, 1969), rpt. in Discriminations: Further Concepts of Criticism (New Haven, 1970), pp. 275–303.Google Scholar
‘Indeterminacy of French interpretation: Derrida and Davidson’, in (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford, 1986), pp. 477–94.Google Scholar
, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘The ambiguity of Henry James’, in The Triple Thinkers (Harmondsworth, 1962), pp. 102–50.Google Scholar
(ed.) About Interpretation. From Plato to Dilthey: A Hermeneutic Anthology (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘The creative personality as viewed by the Prague linguistic circle: theories and implications’, in (ed.), American Contributions to the Seventh International Congress of Slavists, I - Linguistics and Poetics (The Hague, 1973), pp. 361–76.Google Scholar
‘Roman Jakobson and avant-garde art’, in and (eds.), Roman Jakobson, pp. 503–14.
‘Jan Mukařfovský: the beginnings of structural and semiotic aesthetics’, in (ed.), Sound, pp. 433–55.
, ‘On the relation of verbal and non-verbal art in early Prague semiotics: Jan Mukařrovsǩy’, in , and (eds.), The Sign, pp. 227–37.
, ‘Der intendierte Leser: Überlegungen und Beispiele eines literatur wissenschaftlichen Begriffs’, Poetica, 4 (1971), 141–66.Google Scholar
, ‘The professor knows’, Review of Is There a Text in This Class? by , New York Review of Books, 28 (17 December 1981), 64–6.Google Scholar
, ‘Speech-act theory and the perpetuation of the dogma of literary autonomy’, Centrum, 6 (1978), 75–89.Google Scholar
, ‘Derrida, Searle, contexts, games, riddles’, New Literary History, 13 (1982), 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, ‘Phänomenologie und Herme- neutik’, no. 5, Heft 17 (1975).
, ‘Moritz Geiger zum Gedachtnis’, Zeitschrift füosophische orschung, 7 (1960), 452–66.Google Scholar
, ‘Der Leser als Produzent: Zur Problematik der rezeptionsästhetischen Methode’, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 4 (1974), 12–26.Google Scholar
, Literaturrezeption im historischen Prozeβ: Zur Theorie einer Rezeptionsgeschichte der Literatur (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar
and (eds.), Zur Kritik literaturwissenschaftlicher Methodologie (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1973).Google Scholar