Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:04:24.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Politics in Brazil Under Military Rule, 1964–1985

from PART ONE - POLITICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

Celso Castro
Affiliation:
Director, Centro de Pesquisa e Documentaçãao de História Contemporâ Brasil, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro
Leslie Bethell
Affiliation:
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The golpe militar (military coup) of 31 March–1 April 1964 which overthrew the legally constituted government of President João Goulart made use of a good deal of democratic rhetoric: one of the principal aims of what the instigators of the coup called the ‘Revolution’ of 1964, besides ending the ‘chaos, corruption and communism’ of the Goulart administration and restoring discipline and respect for hierarchy in the Armed Forces, was the elimination of the threat, as they saw it, that the Goulart administration posed to Brazilian democracy. The coup was, in this sense, a countercoup for democracy. In the aftermath of the coup, however, by means of a series of so-called Atos Institucionais (Institutional Acts), complementary acts, a new Constitution, a revised Constitution, constitutional amendments and various so-called pacotes (packages of arbitrary measures), the military regime established in April 1964, while never entirely destroying them, radically remodelled and severely undermined the democratic institutions, albeit limited and flawed, established in Brazil at the end of the Second World War.

For twenty-one years, until the transition to civilian rule (though not yet to a fully fledged democracy) in March 1985, Brazilians lived under authoritarian military rule. During this period a succession of five presidents, all of them senior (four-star) generals, were first selected by the military high command (after 1967 formally constituted as the Alto Comando das Forças Armadas) and then indirectly ‘elected’, at first by Congress, later by an Electoral College, a majority of whosemembers were guaranteed to support the military’s chosen candidate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castro, Celso and D’Araújo, Maria Celina, Ernesto Geisel (Rio de Janeiro, 1997).Google Scholar
Castro, Celso and D’Araújo, Maria Celina, Dossiê Geisel (Rio de Janeiro, 2002).Google Scholar
Castro, CelsoD’Araújo, Maria Celina, Ernesto Geisel (Rio de Janeiro, 1997).Google Scholar
Costa Couto, Ronaldo, História indiscreta da ditadura e da abertura. Brasil: 1964–85 (Rio de Janeiro, 1999)Google Scholar
D’Alva Gil Kinzo, Maria, Legal opposition politics under authoritarian rule: the MDB, 1966–79 (Oxford, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, Adyr Fiúza, in Dillon Soares, Gláucio Ary, D’Araújo, Maria Celina and Castro, Celso (eds.), Os anos de chumbo: A memória militar sobre a repressão (Rio de Janeiro, 1994).Google Scholar
Dillon Soares, Gláucio Ary, D’Araújo, Maria Celina and Castro, Celso (eds.), Visões do golpe (3 vols, 1994–1995).
Fleischer, David, ‘Brazil at the crossroads: the elections of 1982 and 1985’, in Drake, Paul W. and Silva, Eduardo (eds.), Elections and democratization in Latin America, 1980–85 (San Diego, 1986).Google Scholar
Gaspari, Elio, A ditadura escancarada (São Paulo, 2002).Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, ‘The international dimensions of democratization in Latin America: the case of Brazil’, in Whitehead, Laurence (ed.), The international dimensions of democratisation (Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar
Lemos, Renato, ‘Poder judiciário e poder militar (1964–69)’, in Castro, Celso, e Victor Izecksohn, Hendrik Kraay (eds.), Nova história militar brasileira (Rio de Janeiro, 2004).Google Scholar
Motley, L. A., ‘Letting off steam’, in Binnendijk, H. (ed.), Authoritarian regimes in transition (Washington DC, 1987).Google Scholar
Ridenti, Marcelo, ‘As mulheres na política brasileira: os anos de chumbo’, Tempo Social 2/2, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serbin, Kenneth P., Secret dialogues. Church-state relations, torture and social justice in authoritarian Brazil (Pittsburgh, PA, 2000).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×