6 - The agrarian structures of Latin America, 1930–1990
from PART THREE - ECONOMY AND SOCIETY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Summary
The period from the 1930s to the 1980s was marked by far-reaching changes in agrarian structures throughout Latin America. Indeed, it could be argued that the magnitude of change was greater during this half century than in the preceding four centuries. Agricultural production increased dramatically but, by 1990, in almost all Latin American countries, agriculture had become a less important contributor to the gross national product than industry. The social and political significance of agriculture altered sharply. In the 1930s most people in Latin America made their living from the land. Land ownership was still the key to political and economic power at the regional and national level. Many presidents and key political figures were members of the landed elite. By the 1980s those working directly in agriculture were only a quarter of the total labour force. Urban interests and occupations based on industry and services (which included a wide range of financial and administrative services) had become politically dominant.
Crucial changes in the process of agricultural production accompanied this shift in the economic, political and social significance of agriculture and landholding. In the 1930s agricultural production, though usually market-orientated, was largely decentralized. Cropping practices and the organization of agricultural inputs varied from region to region, depending upon ecology, the availability of labour and the nature of the market. This had given rise to a diversity of agrarian structures that generated distinctive regional identities. By the early 1980s agricultural production had become increasingly centralized through the state or large-scale agribusinesses, usually linked to international marketing and financial institutions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Latin America , pp. 325 - 390Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
References
, A Community in the Andes: Problems and Progress in Muquiyauyo (Seattle, Wash., 1959).Google Scholar
et al., ‘Life in a Mexican Village: a SAM perspective’, Journal of Development Studies, 25 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , Coffee in Colombia 1850–1970; an Economic, Social and Political History (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
and , Explotación familiar y acumulación de capital en el campo argentino (Buenos Aires, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Relay Migration and the Survival of the Peasant Household’, in (ed.), Toward a Political Economy of Urbanization in Third World Countries (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar
, El Abandono rural: un modelo explicativo de la emigración de trabajadores en el occidente de México (Guadalajara, 1989).Google Scholar
, ONGS, Sociedad Civil y Estado en Guatemala: elementos para el debate (Guatemala City, 1990).
, ‘Producers and Reproducers: Andean marketwomen in the economy’, in and (eds), Women and Change in Latin America (South Hadley, Mass., 1985)Google Scholar
and , Regional Economic Development: the River Basin Approach in Mexico (Cambridge, 1970).Google Scholar
, Desarrollo regional y reorganización campesina: la Chontalpa como reflejo del problema agropecuario Mexicano (Mexico, D. F., 1978).Google Scholar
, Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies of the Third World (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
and , Women of the Andes: Patriarchy and Social Change in Two Peruvian Villages (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Economics and Prestige in a Mayan Community: the Religious Cargo System of Zinacantan (Stanford, Cal., 1965)Google Scholar
and , ‘Chile's Three Land Reforms: the inheritors’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 1, 2 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Social and Economic-political Evolution of the Communities of Central Peru’, in (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. II (Washington, D.C., 1946)Google Scholar
, Boletin Demográfuo, No. 23 (Santiago, 1979).
, ‘Los mercados de insumos tecnológicos y su adecuación a las economias campesinas; agroindustrias y agricultura campesina.’ Estudios e Informes (Santiago, 1984).
, Transformation ocupacional y crisis social en América Latina (Santiago, 1989).
, Unseasonal Migrations: the Effects of Rural Labour Scarcity in Peru (Princeton, N.J., 1988).Google Scholar
, ‘The Mechanics of Internal Domination and Social Change in Peru’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 3, 12 (1967–8).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
points out that only a small part of the spectacular advances in rural technology since the 1930s found their way to Argentina: Essays on the Economic History of the Argentine Republic (New Haven, Conn., 1970).Google Scholar
, The Modernization of Mexican Agriculture: Socioeconomic Implications of Technological Change 1940–1970 (Geneva, 1976).Google Scholar
and , Women in Andean Agriculture: Peasant Production and Rural Wage Employment in Colombia and Peru (Washington, D.C., 1982)Google Scholar
, , and , ‘The Peasantry and the Development of Sandinista Agrarian Policy. 1979–1984’, Latin American Research Review, 20, 3 (1985).Google Scholar
, and (eds), Peasants, Power and Applied Social Change: Vicos as a Model (Beverly Hills, Cal., 1971).Google Scholar
, Harvesting Change: Labor and Agrarian Reform in Nicaragua 1979–1990 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1991)Google Scholar
, Production Yearbook, Vol. II. (1949).
, Production Yearbook, (1983).
, Strawberry Imperialism: an Enquiry into the Mechanisms of Dependency in Mexican Agriculture (The Hague, 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Agroindustries and rural underdevelopment’, in (ed.), Environment, Society and Rural Change in Latin America (London, 1980)Google Scholar
, The Struggle for Land: a Political Economy of the Pioneer Frontier in Brazil from 1930 to the Present Day (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Boom’ cenalero y cambios en la estructura socio-politica de Santa Fe (1870–1895) (Buenos Aires, 1974).Google Scholar
, Peasants, Entrepreneurs, and Social Change: Frontier Development in Lowland Bolivia (Boulder, Colo., 1987)Google Scholar
and , ‘The ‘Boias-frias’ – Rural Proletarianization and Urban Marginality in Brazil’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1, 2 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Agro-industry, State Policy, and Rural Social Structures: recent analyses of proletarianization in Brazilian agriculture’, in and (eds), Proletarianization in the Third World (London, 1984).Google Scholar
, and , From Farming to Biotechnology: a Theory of Agroindustrial Development (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘Estructura tenencial y relaciones de producción en el camp o brasileno’, Estudios Rurales Latinoamericanos (Bogotá) 5, 2, (1982)Google Scholar
, Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Peasants in Mexico: a Case Study in Public Policy (Berkeley, Cal., 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Labour and Produce in an Ethnic Economy, Northern Potosi, Bolivia’, in (ed.), Ecology and Exchange in the Andes (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘The Palm and the Pleaides: initiation and cosmology in Northwest Amazonia’, in Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 24 (1987).Google Scholar
, Revolution from Without: Yucatan, Mexico and the United States, 1880–1924 (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
, Chile: an Appraisal of Popular Unity's Agrarian Reform, Occasional Paper no. 13, , Glasgow, 1974.Google Scholar
, ‘Achievements and Contradictions of the Peruvian Agrarian Reform’, Journal of Development Studies, 182 (1982).Google Scholar
, Modernization, Dislocation and Aprismo: Origins of the Peruvian Aprista Party 1879–1932 (Austin, Tex., 1973).Google Scholar
Colonialism and Agrarian Transformation in Bolivia, Cochabamba, 1500–1900 (Princeton, N.J. 1988).Google Scholar
, Debate sobre la mujer en América Latina y el Caribe: discución acerca de la unidad producción-reproducción (Bogotá, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Family, Fungibility and Formality: rural advantages of informal non-farm enterprise versus the urban-formal state’, in (ed.), Human Resources, Employment and Development (London, 1984).Google Scholar
and , Miners, Peasants and Entrepreneurs: Regional Development in the Central Highlands of Peru (Cambridge, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Capitalist development and agrarian structure in Brazil’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2, 1 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Interhousehold Cooperation in Peru's Southern Andes: a case of multiple sibling group marriage’, in (ed.), Family and Work in Rural Societies: Perspectives on Non-Wage Labour (London, 1984)Google Scholar
, The Defence of Community in Peru's Central Highlands: Peasant Struggle and Capitalist Transition, 1860–1940 (Princeton, N.J., 1983)Google Scholar
, El costo social de un exito politico: la politica expansionista del estado Mexicano en el agro lagunero (Chapingo, Mexico, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Reform Governments and Policy Implementation: Lessons from Peru’, in (ed.), The Politics and Policy of Implementation (Princeton, N.J., 1980).Google Scholar
and , ‘Una cuestion regional en la Argentina: burguesias provinciates y el mercado nacional en el desarrollo argoexportador’, Desarrollo Económico, 18, 69 (1978).Google Scholar
, , The Cristero Rebellion: the Mexican People between Church and State, 1926–1929 (Cambridge, 1976)Google Scholar
reaches similar conclusions in his study of the Peruvian village of Quinua: Peasants on the Edge: Crops, Cult, and Crisis in the Andes (Austin, Tex., 1991).Google Scholar
and , ‘Mixtec Ethnicity: social identity, political consciousness, and political activism’, Latin American Research Review, 25, 2, (1990).Google Scholar
, ‘La agriculture campesina en América Latina’, Revista de la CEPAL No. 16, (Santiago, 1982).Google Scholar
, Estado boliviano y ayllu andino: tierra y tributo en el norte de Potosi (Lima, 1982).Google Scholar
, Development and the Environmental Crisis: Red or Green Alternatives? (London, 1984).Google Scholar
, The Transformation of Mexican Agriculture: International Structure and the Politics of Rural Change (Princeton, N.J., 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘“Corn Fever”: Italian tenant farming families in Argentina (1895–1912)’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3, 1 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Rancheros of Pisaflores: the History of a Peasant Bourgeoisie in Twentieth-century Mexico (Toronto, 1980)Google Scholar
, ‘Transnational Corporations and Asymmetries in the Latin American Food System’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3, 1 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The End of a Tradition: Culture Change and Development in the Municipio of Cunha, Sāo Paulo, Brazil (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘Estructura tenencial y relaciones de producción en el camp o brasileno’, Estudios Rurales Latinoamericanos (Bogotá) 5, 2, (1982)Google Scholar
, Livelihood and Resistance: Peasants and the Politics of Land in Peru (Berkeley, Cal., 1989).Google Scholar
, ‘From Cooperative to Hacienda: the Case of the Agrarian Society of Pucara’, in and (eds), Peasant Cooperation and Capitalist Expansion in Central Peru (Austin, Tex., 1978).Google Scholar
, Coffee Planters, Workers, and Wives: Class Conflict and Gender Relations on Sāo Paulo Plantations, 1850–1980 (Oxford, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Peasant economies and capitalist development of agriculture in the Cauca Valley, Colombia’, in (ed.), Rural Development: Theories of Peasant Economies and Agrarian Change (London, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Peasants and the Shaping of the Revolutionary State, 1910–1940’, in (ed.), Riot, Rebellion, and Revolution: Rural Social Conflict in Mexico (Princeton, N.J., 1988).Google Scholar
, Statistical Yearbook for Latin America (1984).
, Migration, Ethnicity, and Adaptation: Bolivian Migrant Workers in Northwest Argentina (Austin, Tex., 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico’, American Anthropologist, 58, 6 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Rural Development (Washington, D.C., 1975).
, ‘Agricultural policy in Mexico: the limits of a growth model’, in , and (eds), State, Capital, and Rural Society: Anthropological Perspectives on Political Economy in Mexico and the Andes (Boulder, Colo., 1989).Google Scholar