Augustine. Sense and imagination

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521040549.025

Chapter 24 - Augustine. Sense and imagination

from Part V - MARIUS VICTORINUS AND AUGUSTINE

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Edited by

A. H. Armstrong

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Sense-knowledge, as Augustine always insists, is, like all knowledge, a work of the soul, not of the bodily organs; it is a work ‘of the soul by means of the body’. All his more sustained discussions of this type of knowledge are attempts to make comprehensible the way in which the mind uses the bodily organs of sense in obtaining knowledge from sense-experience. His treatment of sensation (sentire) is therefore in line with his view of man as a soul using a body, and the analogy of the craftsman using his tools is the model on which it is constructed. Thus he begins the long discussion of this topic in his De quantitate animae with the following definition: ‘sensation consists in the mind's awareness of the body's experience’. A necessary condition of sensation, according to this definition, is the encounter between the bodily sense-organ and the object perceived; but sensation is more than this physical encounter on which it depends, and involves the mind's awareness. The definition assimilates sensation to the category of passio or, more precisely, to an awareness by the mind of what the body ‘suffers’. Augustine deals at length with the difficulties of treating sensation in these terms. What, he asks, do the eyes ‘suffer’ in seeing something? Evodius, his interlocutor in the dialogue, invokes the analogy of feeling pain and emotions: what the eyes suffer when seeing is sight itself, just as a sick man suffers sickness or a rejoicing man joy.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy , pp. 374 - 379

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521040549.025 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andresen, C., Bibliographia Augustiniana. Darmstadt, 1962.Google Scholar

Baynes, N. H.The Political Ideas of St Augustine's ‘De civitate Dei’London, 1936.Google Scholar

Bonner, G.St Augustine of Hippo.London, 1963.Google Scholar

Boyer, C.Christianisme et néo-Platonisme dans la formation de saint Augustin.Paris, 1920.Google Scholar

Boyer, C.L'idée de vérité dans la philosophie de saint Augustin, 2e éd. Paris, 1941.Google Scholar

Burnaby, J.Amor Dei.London, 1938.Google Scholar

Cayré, F.Initiation à la philosophie de saint Augustin.Paris, 1947.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P.Recherches sur les Confessions de saint Augustin.Paris, 1950.Google Scholar

Deane, H. A.The Political and Social Ideas of St Augustine, New York and London, 1963.Google Scholar

Deman, P. T.Le traitement scientifique de la morale chretienne selon saint Augustin.Paris, 1957.Google Scholar

Dinkier, E.Die Anthropologie Augustins.Stuttgart, 1964.Google Scholar

Explanationes in rhetoricam Ciceronis, ed. Halm, O., Rhetores latini minores (Leipzig, 1863).

Fuchs, H.Augustin und der antike Friedensgedanke.Berlin, 1926.Google Scholar

Gilson, E.The Christian Philosophy of Saint Augustine, transl. by Lynch, L. E. M.. London, 1961.Google Scholar

Guitton, J.Le temps et l'éternité chez Plotin et saint Augustin, 2e éd. Paris, 1955.Google Scholar

Holte, R.Béatitude et Sagesse: St. Augustin et le problème de la fin de l'homme dans la philosophie ancienne.Paris, 1962.Google Scholar

Jolivet, R.Dieu soleil des esprits.Paris, 1934.Google Scholar

Kamlah, W.Christentum und Geschichtlichkeit.Stuttgart, 1951.Google Scholar

Lauras, A. and Rondet, H. ‘Le thème des deux cités dans l'ceuvre de s. Augustin,’ in Études augustiniennes (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar

Lorenz, R. ‘Die Wissenschaftslehre Augustins’, in Zeits. f Kirchengesch. 67 (1955–6).Google Scholar

Maier, F. G.Augustin und das antike Rom.Stuttgart, 1956.Google Scholar

,Marius VictorinusAd Candidum, in Traités théologiques sur la Trinité, ed. Henry, P. and Hadot, P. [with introduction, French translation and notes] (Sources Chrétiennes).Paris, 1960.

,Marius VictorinusArs grammatica, ed. Keil, H., Grammatici latini, vol. 6 (Leipzig, 1874).

Marrou, H. I.Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique.Paris, 1938 [and Retractatio, Paris, 1949].

Marrou, H. I.Saint Augustine and his Influence through the Ages.London, 1957.Google Scholar

Mausbach, J.Die Ethik des heiligen Augustinus.Freiburg, 1909.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. E.‘Augustine's theory of progress’ and ‘Augustine and Orosius’, reprinted in Medieval and Renaissance Studies.New York, 1959.Google Scholar

O'Meara, J. J.The Young Augustine.London, 1954.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, J.Volk und Haus Gottes in Augustinus' Lehre von der Kirche.München, 1954.Google Scholar

Schmaus, M.Die psychologische Trinitätslehre des Heiligen Augustinus.Münster, 1907.Google Scholar

Straub, J. ‘Augustins Sorge um die regeneratio imperii’, in Histor. Jahrb. 73 (1954).Google Scholar

Straub, J. ‘Christliche Geschichtsapologetik in der Krisis des römischen Reiches’, in Historia, 1 (1950).Google Scholar

Wachtel, A.Beiträge zur Geschichtstheologie des Aurelius Augustinus.Bonn, 1960.Google Scholar