Augustine. Reason and illumination

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521040549.024

Chapter 23 - Augustine. Reason and illumination

from Part V - MARIUS VICTORINUS AND AUGUSTINE

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Edited by

A. H. Armstrong

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Augustine likes to distinguish different grades in the range of knowledge of which the human mind is capable. We have already noted one distinction, that between belief and understanding. Understanding, Augustine seems to suggest, is the distinctive work of human reason: it is the result of its application and pursuit. When he is concerned to contrast understanding with belief, Augustine normally speaks of intellectus, intelligere, intelligentia; when he discusses the result in the mind of the work of reasoning, he speaks of scientia. Thus one of his definitions of scientia in effect almost identifies it with intellectus: in the course of a lengthy discussion of the distinctive character of human knowledge (scientia) he likens the relationship between reason and knowledge to that between looking and seeing: knowledge is the success of the enterprise of reason. Its chief characteristic is rational cogency; something is known when it is fully clear and transparent to the mind, and is, so to speak, seen by it.

Before we examine the various mental processes involved in different kinds of knowledge, we must note a distinction which Augustine introduces within scientia: he defines wisdom (sapientia) as knowledge of a special kind. He calls it a ‘contemplative knowledge’, and describes it as being concerned with eternal objects, whereas the remainder of scientia, to which he now confines the term in a narrower sense, is concerned with temporal things. Knowledge and wisdom differ only in virtue of the difference in the objects concerned, and Augustine allows that their distinction is not radical: the words may indeed be used interchangeably.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy , pp. 362 - 373

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521040549.024 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andresen, C., Bibliographia Augustiniana. Darmstadt, 1962.Google Scholar

Baynes, N. H.The Political Ideas of St Augustine's ‘De civitate Dei’London, 1936.Google Scholar

Bonner, G.St Augustine of Hippo.London, 1963.Google Scholar

Boyer, C.Christianisme et néo-Platonisme dans la formation de saint Augustin.Paris, 1920.Google Scholar

Boyer, C.L'idée de vérité dans la philosophie de saint Augustin, 2e éd. Paris, 1941.Google Scholar

Burnaby, J.Amor Dei.London, 1938.Google Scholar

Cayré, F.Initiation à la philosophie de saint Augustin.Paris, 1947.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P.Recherches sur les Confessions de saint Augustin.Paris, 1950.Google Scholar

Deane, H. A.The Political and Social Ideas of St Augustine, New York and London, 1963.Google Scholar

Deman, P. T.Le traitement scientifique de la morale chretienne selon saint Augustin.Paris, 1957.Google Scholar

Dinkier, E.Die Anthropologie Augustins.Stuttgart, 1964.Google Scholar

Explanationes in rhetoricam Ciceronis, ed. Halm, O., Rhetores latini minores (Leipzig, 1863).

Fuchs, H.Augustin und der antike Friedensgedanke.Berlin, 1926.Google Scholar

Gilson, E.The Christian Philosophy of Saint Augustine, transl. by Lynch, L. E. M.. London, 1961.Google Scholar

Guitton, J.Le temps et l'éternité chez Plotin et saint Augustin, 2e éd. Paris, 1955.Google Scholar

Holte, R.Béatitude et Sagesse: St. Augustin et le problème de la fin de l'homme dans la philosophie ancienne.Paris, 1962.Google Scholar

Jolivet, R.Dieu soleil des esprits.Paris, 1934.Google Scholar

Kamlah, W.Christentum und Geschichtlichkeit.Stuttgart, 1951.Google Scholar

Lauras, A. and Rondet, H. ‘Le thème des deux cités dans l'ceuvre de s. Augustin,’ in Études augustiniennes (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar

Lorenz, R. ‘Die Wissenschaftslehre Augustins’, in Zeits. f Kirchengesch. 67 (1955–6).Google Scholar

Maier, F. G.Augustin und das antike Rom.Stuttgart, 1956.Google Scholar

,Marius VictorinusAd Candidum, in Traités théologiques sur la Trinité, ed. Henry, P. and Hadot, P. [with introduction, French translation and notes] (Sources Chrétiennes).Paris, 1960.

,Marius VictorinusArs grammatica, ed. Keil, H., Grammatici latini, vol. 6 (Leipzig, 1874).

Marrou, H. I.Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique.Paris, 1938 [and Retractatio, Paris, 1949].

Marrou, H. I.Saint Augustine and his Influence through the Ages.London, 1957.Google Scholar

Mausbach, J.Die Ethik des heiligen Augustinus.Freiburg, 1909.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. E.‘Augustine's theory of progress’ and ‘Augustine and Orosius’, reprinted in Medieval and Renaissance Studies.New York, 1959.Google Scholar

O'Connell, R. J. in a number of recent articles, conveniently summarized in Rev. des études augustiniennes, XI (1965).

O'Connor, D. J.Critical history of Western philosophy, ed. (New York, 1964).CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Meara, J. J.The Young Augustine.London, 1954.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, J.Volk und Haus Gottes in Augustinus' Lehre von der Kirche.München, 1954.Google Scholar

Schmaus, M.Die psychologische Trinitätslehre des Heiligen Augustinus.Münster, 1907.Google Scholar

Straub, J. ‘Augustins Sorge um die regeneratio imperii’, in Histor. Jahrb. 73 (1954).Google Scholar

Straub, J. ‘Christliche Geschichtsapologetik in der Krisis des römischen Reiches’, in Historia, 1 (1950).Google Scholar

Wachtel, A.Beiträge zur Geschichtstheologie des Aurelius Augustinus.Bonn, 1960.Google Scholar