Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T03:58:40.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Dispute Settlement, Particularly Adjudication and Arbitration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Randall Lesaffer
Affiliation:
KU Leuven and Tilburg University
Robert Kolb
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Momchil Milanov
Affiliation:
International Court of Justice
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, the authors frame the interwar period as instrumental for the institutionalisation of international dispute settlement, with respect to both the establishment of institutions and the development of new applicable law. The chapter focuses on the institutions, but equally emphasises the foundational principles which govern the field, with the principle of consent at the forefront; with all their characteristic features and limitations, such principles are conspicuous and remain valid today. The chapter gives context to the creation of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and the subsequent establishment and the main features of the Permanent Court; last but not least, it pays homage to the mixed arbitral tribunals, with their impressive machinery and cases decided. The interwar period was undoubtedly a time of experimentation, but it would be naïve to believe that it has come to an end: experiments remain ongoing.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Further Reading

Caron, David, ‘Framing political theory of international courts and tribunals: reflections at the centennial/The American Society of International Law and the rise of international courts and tribunals: an eventful century’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 100 (2006) 5562.Google Scholar
Caron, David, ‘War and international adjudication: reflections on the 1899 peace conference’, American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000) 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Gerard, ‘The Arbitral Tribunal for Upper Silesia: an early success in international adjudication’ in de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Experiments in International Adjudication. Historical Accounts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019) 98123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘The General Claims Commission (Mexico/US) and the invention of international responsibility’ in de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Experiments in International Adjudication. Historical Accounts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019) 150–68.Google Scholar
de la Rasilla, Ignacio, ‘The turn to the history of international adjudication’ in de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Experiments in International Adjudication. Historical Accounts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019) 3251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erpelding, Michel, Hess, Burkhard and Ruiz Fabri, Hélène (eds.), Peace through Law. The Versailles Peace Treaty and Dispute Settlement after World War i (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2023).Google Scholar
Fachiri, Alexander P., The Permanent Court of International Justice. Its Constitution, Procedure and Work (2nd edn, London: Oxford University Press 1932).Google Scholar
Hernández, Gleider I., The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Manley O., The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920–1942 (New York: Macmillan 1943).Google Scholar
Kaeckenbeeck, Georges, ‘The character and work of the Arbitral Tribunal of Upper Silesia’, Transactions of the Grotius Society: Problems of Peace and War, Papers Read before the Society in the Year 1935, 21 (1935) 2744.Google Scholar
Kaeckenbeeck, Georges, The International Experiment of Upper Silesia. A Study in the Working of the Upper Silesian Settlement, 1922–1937 (London: Oxford University Press 1942).Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, ‘Article 14’ in Kolb, Robert (ed.), Commentaire du Pacte de la Société des Nations (Brussels: Bruylant 2014) 587–98.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, The International Court of Justice (transl. Perry, Alan, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons and New York: Frederick A. Praeger 1958).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1933).Google Scholar
Lorca, Arnulf Becker, Mestizo International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Mixed claims commissions and the once centrality of the protection of aliens’ in de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Experiments in International Adjudication. Historical Accounts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019) 127–49.Google Scholar
Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, and Erpelding, Michel (eds.), The Mixed Arbitral Tribunals, 1919–1939. An Experiment in the International Adjudication of Private Rights (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skouteris, Thomas, The Notion of Progress in International Law Discourse (The Hague: TMC Asser Press 2010).Google Scholar
Spiermann, Ole, ‘Historical introduction’ in Zimmermann, A., Tomuschat, C., Oellers-Frahm, K. and Tams, C. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice (3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019) 92116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiermann, Ole, International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiermann, Ole, ‘Who attempts too much does nothing well: the 1920 Advisory Committee of Jurists and the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice’, British Yearbook of International Law, 73 (2002) 187260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, Christian J., and Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (eds.), Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2013).Google Scholar
Theus, Willem, ‘International commercial courts: a new frontier in international commercial dispute resolution?’ Lessons from the mixed courts of the colonial era’, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 10 (2022) 275308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollmann, Jakob, ‘Mixed arbitral tribunals: post-World War i peace treaties’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (2022), at https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3355.013.3355/law-mpeipro-e3355?prd=OPIL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×