Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T05:44:28.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Colonies and Mandates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Randall Lesaffer
Affiliation:
KU Leuven and Tilburg University
Robert Kolb
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Momchil Milanov
Affiliation:
International Court of Justice
Get access

Summary

Colonies and mandates, along with protectorates, belong to the wider group of ‘dependent’ territories. Colonies were under the total control of a foreign power which decided all aspects of the administrative, executive and legislative organisation. Public international law was mainly relevant for slavery, forced labour and ‘open-door’ policies. The mandates system was certainly inspired by colonialism, especially in the eyes of contemporaries, for whom colonialism was the ‘white man’s burden’ for the benefit of ‘uncivilised peoples’. However, it also had fundamental structural differences: their purpose – the ‘civilising mission’ – and the triangular relationship (League of Nations, territory, mandate), stand in sharp contrast to the colonial institution. In addition, the mandatory power was not the holder of sovereignty over the mandated territory. The triangular relationship refers particularly to the control that is supposed to embody it. The control exercised by the League marks a notable difference from the colonial system, establishing for the first time in the history of international relations a sophisticated form of indirect international administration of territories.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Benton, Lauren, Law and Colonial Cultures. Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Dareste, Pierre, Traité de droit colonial (3 vols., Paris: s.n. 1931).Google Scholar
Mérignhac, Alexandre, Traité de législation et d’économie coloniales (2nd edn, Paris: Sirey 1925).Google Scholar
Moresco, Emmanuel, ‘Les rapports de droit public entre la métropole et les colonies, dominions et autres territoires d’outre-mer’, Recueil des cours, 55 (1936-i) 507–93.Google Scholar
Roberts-Wray, Kenneth, Commonwealth and Colonial Law (London: Stevens & Sons 1966).Google Scholar
van Asbeck, Frederik Mari, ‘Le régime des étrangers dans les colonies’, Recueil des cours, 61 (1937-iii) 195.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Baty, T., ‘Protectorates and mandates’, British Yearbook of International Law, 2 (1921–1922) 109–21.Google Scholar
Comisetti, Louis, Mandats et souveraineté. La notion de souveraineté au sein du système mandataire international. Critique de l’article 22 du Pacte de la Société des Nations (Paris and Geneva: Librairie du Recueil Sirey, 1934).Google Scholar
Diena, Giulio, ‘Les mandats internationaux’, Recueil des cours, 5 (1924-iv) 211–65.Google Scholar
Distefano, Giovanni, ‘Article 22’ in Kolb, Robert (ed.), Commentaire sur le pacte de la Société des Nations (Brussels: Bruylant 2014) 8411002.Google Scholar
Hébié, Mamadou, and da Cruz, Paula Baldini Miranda, ‘Chapter 4: The legacy of the mandates system of the League of Nations’ in Peace through Law. The Versailles Peace Treaty and Dispute Settlement after World War i (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag 2019) 99122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The mandate under international law in the Covenant of the League of Nations’ in International Law. Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, ed. Lauterpacht, Elihu, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1977) 2984.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Susan, The Guardians. The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Jean, Commentaire du Pacte de la Société des Nations (Paris: Sirey 1930).Google Scholar
Rolin, Henri, ‘La pratique des mandats internationaux’, Recueil des cours, 19 (1927-iv) 493628.Google Scholar
Stoyanovsky, Jacob, La théorie des mandats internationaux (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 1925).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×