Sources

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.002

1 - Sources

from PART I - INTRODUCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Edited by

Jaap Mansfeld and

Jaap Mansfeld: Affiliation:
University of Utrecht
Keimpe Algra: Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes: Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld: Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Why so much has been lost

We know a good deal about Hellenistic philosophy, but by no means as much as we would like to know. The reason is that with very few exceptions no works written by the Hellenistic philosophers themselves survive. The situation is therefore quite different from that in which we find ourselves with regard to the great classical philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. Plato's complete works have been preserved. Much of Aristotle's vast output has perished, but the philosophically more important part of his writings is still available. The reason for the preservation of these Platonic and Aristotelian corpora is that these works continued to be taught and studied in the philosophical schools. Treatises of Aristotle were taught by the late Neoplatonists as a preparation for the study of a set of dialogues by Plato, and those of his works which were not part of the curricula have mostly perished. The professional teachers of philosophy themselves were required to have perfect knowledge of practically everything these great masters had written.

But by the end of the third century AD the schools (in the sense both of institutions and schools of thought) which had been founded in the early Hellenistic period had died out. The works of Epicurus and his immediate followers, or of the great early Stoics for example, were no longer taught, though a preliminary instruction in the views of the main schools could still be part of a decent pagan education in the fourth and to a much lesser extent in the fifth and sixth centuries AD.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy , pp. 1 - 30

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackroyd, P. R. (1970) ‘The Old Testament in the making’, in Ackroyd, & Evans, (1970).CrossRef Google Scholar

Algra, K. A. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: The ethical divisiones in Cicero's Lucullus’, in Inwood, & Mansfeld, (1997).Google Scholar

Angeli, A. (1986) ‘Compendi, eklogai, tetrapharmakos: due capitoli di dissenso nell'Epicureismo’, CErc 16.Google Scholar

Annas, J. E. (1992b) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the Peripatetics’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Arnim, J. von, ed. (1903–24) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, Bd. I–III; Bd. IV, indices by Adler, M. (Leipzig, later repr.).Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1994) ‘Riflessione sulla letteratura e biografia presso i Greci’, in Montanari, (1994).Google Scholar

Aune, D. E (1987) The New Testament in its Literary Environment, Library of Early Christianity 8 (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le Stoïcisme, Publications de l'Université de Lyon (Paris).Google Scholar

Barker, A. (1989) Greek Musical Writings, vol. II: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: The philosophy of Pyrrhonism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.6 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Berger, K. (1984) ‘Hellenistische Gattungen im Neuen Testament’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 25.2 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Bernheim, E. (1908) Lehrbuch der historischen Methode und der Geschichtsphilosophie, mit Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hilfsmittel zum Studium der Geschichte, 5th and 6th edn, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Bichler, R. (1983) ‘Hellenismus’, Geschichte und Problematik eines Epochenbegriffs (Darmstadt).Google Scholar

Blomqvist, J. (1974) ‘Die skeptika des Sextus Empiricus’, GB 2.Google Scholar

Boulluec, A. Le (1994) ‘Clément d'Alexandrie’, in Goulet, (1989–94) II.

Boyancé, P. (1936) ‘Les méthodes de l'histoire littéraire. Cicéron et son œuvre philosophique’, REL 14 ; repr. in id. (1970) Etudes sur l'humanisme cicéronien, Collection Latomus 21 (Brussels).Google Scholar

Brent, A. (1993) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the apostolic succession’, JEH 44.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1980) ‘On historical fragments and epitomes’, Classical Quarterly 30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burkert, W., Gemelli Marciano, L., Matelli, E. & Orelli, L., edd. (1998) Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike – Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi, Aporemata 3 (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1993) The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes (Oxford).Google Scholar

Cancik, H. (1984b) ‘Die Gattung Evangelium. Das Evangelium des Markus im Rahmen der antiken Historiographie’, in Cancik, H., d. (1984a) Markus-Philologie (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1993) Vita di Lucrezio (Palermo).Google Scholar

Capasso, M. (1988b) ‘Gli epicurei e il potere della memoria (PHerc. 1041 e 1040)’, in Mandilaras, B. G. et al., edd., Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Congress of Papyrology I (Athens).Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (1983) Libri scritture scribi a Ercolano, CErc, suppl. 1 (Naples).Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (1989) ‘Libro e cultura scritta’, in Momigliano, A. & Schiavone, A., edd., Storia di Roma, vol. 4, Caratteri e morfologia (Turin).Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (1994) ‘Discorsi sul libro’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L. & Lanza, D., Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica vol. I, La produzione e la circolazione del testo, T. 3, I Greci e Roma (Rome).Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1992) ‘L'esposizione dei Sofisti e della Sofistica in Sesto Empirico’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Corssen, P. (1878) De Posidonio Rhodio M. Tulli Ciceronis in libro I. Tusc. disp. et in Somnio Scipionis auctore (Bonn).Google Scholar

Cortassa, G. (1989) ‘Un'ipotesi sulla formazione del corpus di Sesto Empirico: La ricerca sulla tarda antichità’, in Garzya, A., ed., Metodologie della ricerca sulla tarda antichità, Atti del primo convegno dell' associazione di studi tardoantichi (Naples).Google Scholar

Crouzel, H., ed. (1969) Grégoire le Thaumaturge: Remerciement à Origène, suivi de la lettre d'Origène à Grégoire, SC 148 (Paris).Google Scholar

Daiber, H., ed. (1980) Aetius Arabus. Die Vorsokratiker in arabischer Überlieferung, Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz 33 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Decleva Caizzi, F. (1992b) ‘Sesto e gli Scettici’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K. (1930 (repr. w. add. 1965)) Die Griechische Empirikerschule. Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre (Berlin/Zürich).Google Scholar

Deuse, W. (1993) ‘Celsus im Prooemium von “De medicina”: Römische Aneignung griechischer Wissenschaft’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 37.1 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci (Berlin, later repr.).Google Scholar

Diels, H., ed. (1893) Anonymi Londinensis Ex Aristotelis Iatricis Menoniis et aliis medicis Eclogae, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, suppl. Arist. 3.1 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Diels, H., ed. (1901) Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta (Berlin).Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1970) Studien zur Griechischen Biographie, 2nd edn, NAWG 3. F. Nr. 37 (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1982b) ‘Filodemo, Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339)’, CErc 12.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T., ed. (1990a) ‘Filodemo: gli orientamenti della ricerca attuale’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1990b) ‘Filodemo storico del pensiero antico’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T., ed. (1991b) Filodemo: Storia dei Filosofi [.]: Platone e l'Academia (PHerc. 1021 e 164), La Scuola di Epicuro 12 (Naples).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1991d) ‘Den Autoren über die Schulter geschaut: Arbeitsweise und Autographie bei den antiken Schriftstellern’, ZPE 87.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1992a) ‘Considerazioni sull' index locupletior di Diogene Laerzio’, Prometheus 18.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1992b) ‘Il quarto libro delle “Vite” di Diogene Laerzio’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1994b) ‘Bryson d'Achaïe’, in Goulet, (1989–94) II.

Dorandi, T. (1995a) ‘Prolegomena per una edizione dei frammenti di Antigono di Caristo. III’, ZPE 106.Google Scholar

Döring, K. (1992) ‘Die sog. kleinen Sokratiker und ihre Schulen bei Sextus Empiricus’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Dorival, G. (1992) ‘L'apport d'Origène pour la connaissance de la philosophie grecque’, in Daly, R. J., ed. (1992) Origeniana quinta, BETL 105 (Leuven).Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. & Baltes, M. (1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike IV (Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt).Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. & Baltes, M. (1993) Der Platonismus in der Antike: Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung III: Der Platonismus im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert nach Christus (Stuttgart/Bad Canstatt).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1995) ‘Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell, (1995a).Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Einarson, B. & De Lacy, P. H., edd. (1967) Plutarch's Moralia, vol. XIV, LCL (London/Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1992b) ‘Cicero und “unorthodoxer” Epikureismus’, Anregung 38.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans. Wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. & Althoff, J., edd., Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions, Etudes et commentaires 94 (Paris).Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Gallo, I., ed. (1980) Frammenti biografici da papiri II: La biografia dei filosofi (Rome).Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. (1986b) ‘Socrate e i Socratici in Diogene Laerzio’, in Giannantoni (1986a).Google Scholar

Giannattasio Andria, R. (1989) I frammenti delle ‘Successioni dei filosofi’, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità, Università degli studi di Salerno 5 (Naples).Google Scholar

Gigante, M., ed. (1979) Catalogo dei papiri Ercolanesi (Naples).Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1983c) ‘Frammenti di Ippoboto. Contributo alla storia della storiografia filosofica’, in Mastrocinque, A., ed., Studi P. Treves (Padua).Google Scholar

Giusta, M. (1964–7) I dossografi di etica, 2 vols., Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia, Università di Torino vol. 15, fasc. (Turin).Google Scholar

Glibert-Thirry, A., ed. (1977) Pseudo-Andronicus de Rhodes: ‘ΠEPI ΠAΘΩN’, Corpus latinum commentariorum in Aristotelem graecorum, suppl. 2 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy, Hypomnemata 56 (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Πρòζτòν ∊ιπóντα – Sources and credibility of De Stoicorum repugnantiis 8’, ICS 13.Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1991) ‘Images of Plato in late antiquity’, in Unguru, S., ed., Physics, Cosmology and Astronomy, 1300–1700: Tension and Accommodation, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 126 (Dordrecht).Google Scholar

Göransson, T. (1995) Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothobutgensia 61 (Gothenburg).Google Scholar

Görler, W. & Gawlick, G. (1994) ‘6. Cicero’, in Flashar (1994).Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (1989) ‘Aulu Gelle’, in Goulet, (1989–94) 1.

Goulet, R., ed. (1989–94) Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vols. (Paris).Google Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1986) L’ascèse cynique: un commentaire de Diogène Laerce VI (Paris).Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (1969a) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleiting, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (1969b) ‘Epicure et l'enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé (1968).Google Scholar

Hadot, I., ed. (1990) Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories, fasc. 1: Introduction, première partie (3 Kalbfleisch). Traduction de Ph. Hoffmann (avec la collaboration d' I. et P. Hadot), Commentaire et notes à la traduction par I. Hadot, PhA 50 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (1991) ‘The role of the commentaries on Aristotle in the teaching of philosophy according to the prefaces of the Neoplatonic commentaries on the Categories’, in Blumenthal, H. & Robinson, H., edd., Aristotle and the Later Tradition, OSAP, suppl. vol. (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1979) ‘Les divisions des parties de la philosophie dans l'antiquité’, Museum Helveticum 36.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1987) ‘Théologie, exégèse, révélation, écriture dans la philosophie grecque’, in Tardieu, (1987).Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1958) Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study on the Apologists, Jerome and Other Christian Writers (Gothenburg).Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 20 (Gothenburg).Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1972) ‘Chrysippus' solution to the Democritean dilemma of the cone’, Isis 63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1990) ‘The ethical doxography of Arius Didymus’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1992) ‘Galen's philosophical eclecticism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Heine, O. (1869) ‘Kritische Beiträge zum siebenten Buche des Laertios Diogenes’, Jahrbücher für classische Philologie 99.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1974) ‘Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie im PHerc. 1428’, CErc 4.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (1992a) ‘Plutarch and Stoicism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (1992b) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Hülser, K.-H. (1992) ‘Sextus Empiricus und die Stoiker’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (1993b) ‘The Stoic division of philosophy’, Phronesis 38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M. (1992) ‘Sesto Empirico e l'Accademia scettica’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1994) ‘Les éditions de textes’, in Montanari, (1994).Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. (1985–6) ‘Filosofia postaristotelica o filosofia ellenistica: storia di un concetto storiografico’, Annali dell'Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 9.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. (1992) ‘Sesto, Platone, l'Accademia antica e i Pitagorici’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Kahn, Ch. (1983) ‘Arius as a doxographer’, in Fortenbaugh (1983).Google Scholar

Kienle, W. von (1961) Die Berichte über die Sukzessionen der Philosophen in der hellenistischen und spätantiken Literatur (Berlin).Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1989) ‘Lucretius in Herculaneum’, CErc 19.Google Scholar

Knoepfler, D. (1991) La Vie de Ménédème d'Erétrie de Diogène Laërce. Contribution à l'histoire et à la critique du texte des Vies des philosophes, Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 21 (Basle).Google Scholar

Knorr, W. R. (1989) Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry (Boston/Basle/Berlin).CrossRef Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. (1966) ‘Zur Geschichte des medizinischen Lehrbuchs in der Antike’, in Blaser, R. & Buess, H., edd., Aktuelle Probleme aus der Geschichte der Medizin (Basle/New York).Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. (1973) Untersuchungen zu den pseudogalenischenDefinitiones medicae, Schriften zur Geschichte und Kultur der Antike 7 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Kraus, H.-J. (1982) Geschichte der historisch-kritischen Erforschung des Alten Testaments (Neukirschen-Vluyn, 3rd edn).Google Scholar

Kristeller, P. O. (1993) Greek Philosophers of the Hellenistic Age (New York), transl. of Filosofi greci dell' età ellenistica (Pisa 1991).Google Scholar

Küchler, M. (1979) Frühjüdische Weisheitstraditionen, Orbis biblicus et orientalis 26 (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Kümmel, W. G. (1970) Das Neue Testament, Geschichte der Erforschung seiner Probleme (Freiburg/Munich, orig. edn 1958).Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G., ed. (1993) Plutarque: Œuvres morales, T. 12.2: Opinions des philosophes (Paris).Google Scholar

Laks, A. (1996) ‘Du témoignage comme fragment’, in Most (1996).Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. & Pinkster, H. (1981) M. Tullius Cicero: De Oratore libri III. Kommentar, 1. Bd.: Buch I (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Leo, F. (1901) Die Griechisch-Römische Biographie nach ihrer literarischen Form (Leipzig; repr. Darmstadt 1965).Google Scholar

Lilla, S. R. C. (1970) Clement of Alexandria: A Study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991b) ‘Galen on Hellenistics and Hippocrateans: contemporary battles and past authorities’, in Lloyd, (1991a) ; also pr. in Kollesch & Nickel (1993).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1983a) ‘Arius Didymus and the exposition of Stoic ethics’, in Fortenbaugh (1983) ; repr. in Long (1996).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1986a) ‘Diogenes Laertius, life of Arcesilaus’, in Giannantoni (1986a).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).Google Scholar

MacKendrick, P. (1989) The Philosophical Books of Cicero (London; repr. 1995).Google Scholar

Manetti, D. (1986) ‘Note di lettura dell’Anonimo Londinese – Prolegomena ad una nuova edizione’, ZPE 63.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius on Stoic philosophy’, in Giannantoni, (1986a) ; repr. in Mansfeld, (1990b).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1988a) ‘Philosophy in the service of Scripture: Philo's exegetical strategies’, in Dillon, & Long, (1988) ; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study x.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1989c) ‘Chrysippus and the Placita’, Phronesis 34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1990a) ‘Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the “Placita”’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992a) Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus' Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy, PhA 56 (Leiden).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992c) ‘Physikai doxai and problemata physika from Aristotle to Aëtius (and beyond)’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1994a) ‘Epicurus peripateticus’, in Alberti, A., ed., Realtà e ragione, Studi di filosofia antica (Florence).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1994b) Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text, PhA 61 (Leiden).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1998) ‘Doxographical studies, Quellenforschung, tabular presentation, and other varieties of comparativism’, in Burkert, et al. (1998).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. & Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. I: The Sources, PhA 73 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Martini, E. (1899) ‘Analecta laertiana’, pt. 1, Leipziger Studien zur classischen Philologie 19.Google Scholar

Mau, J., ed. (1971) Plutarchi Moralia, vol. v 2.1: x oratorum vitae; Placita philosophorum, Bibl. teubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Méhat, A. (1966) Etudes sur les ‘Stromates’ de Clément d’Alexandrie, Patristica Sorbonensia 7 (Paris).Google Scholar

Mejer, J. (1978) Diogenes Laertius and his Hellenistic Background, Hermes Einzelschr. 40 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Mejer, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the transmission of Greek philosophy’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1993) The Development of Greek Biography, expanded edn (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1973) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos von Rhodos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias Bd. 1, Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I. Jh. v. Chr., Peripatoi 5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1986) ‘Diogène Laërce et le Peripatos’, in Giannantoni, (1986a).Google Scholar

Most, G. W., ed. (1996) Collecting Fragments — Fragmente Sammeln (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Mudry, Ph. (1982) La préface du De Medicina de Celse, Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana 19 (Rome).Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H. (1911a) ‘Inhaltsangabe und Kapitelüberschrift im antiken Buch’, Hermes 46.Google Scholar

Nassen Poulos, P. (1981) ‘Form and function of the pronouncement story in Diogenes’ Lives', in Tannehill, R. C., ed., Pronouncement Studies (Missoula).Google Scholar

Nautin, P. (1976) ‘La fin des Stromates et les hypotyposes de Clément d’Alexandrie’, VChr 30.Google Scholar

Obbink, D., ed. (1996) Philodemus On Piety, Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1978) The Library of Lactantius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F., ed. (1995a) Cicero the Philosopher, Twelve Papers (Oxford).Google Scholar

Puglia, E., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali e esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), La Scuola di Epicuro 8 (Naples).Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1975) Cicero: A Portrait (London).Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. & Wilson, N. G. (1978) Scribes & Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek & Latin Literature, 2nd edn (Oxford).Google Scholar

Ridings, D. (1995) The Attic Moses: The Dependency Theme in Some Early Christian Writers (Gothenburg).Google Scholar

Roselli, A. (1990) ‘Appunti per una storia dell'uso apologetico della filologia: la nuova edizione di Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012)’, SCO 40.Google Scholar

Rubin Pinault, J. (1992) Hippocratic Lives and Legends, Studies in Ancient Medicine 4 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Ruland, H.-J. (1976) Die arabische Fassung zweier Schriften des Alexander von Aphrodisias: Über die Vorsehung und Über das liberum arbitrium (Saarbrücken).Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1990) Exegesis and Philosophy: Studies in Philo of Alexandria, Variorum CSS 332 (Aldershot).Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1993) Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey, Compendia Rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum III.3 (Assen/Minneapolis).Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D. & Westerink, L. G., eds. (1968) Proclus: Théologie Platonicienne, t. I, Coll. Budé (Paris).Google Scholar

Schäfer, K. Th. (1959) ‘Eisagoge’, RAC Bd. 4 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Schäublin, C. (1977) ‘Homerum ex Homero’, MH 34.Google Scholar

Schmidt, P. L. (1978) ‘Cicero's place in Roman philosophy: a study of his prefaces’, CJ 74.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1986b) ‘Cicero for and against divination’, JRS 76.Google Scholar

Schwartz, E. (1905) ‘Diogenes (40) Laertios’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 5, cols.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1989a) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989).Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1992a) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the atomist criteria of truth’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1983) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Fate, Text, Translation, Commentary (London; repr. 1987).Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: scholasticism and innovation’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.2 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Smend, R. (1984) Die Entstehung des Alten Testaments 3rd edn (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Smith, M. F., ed. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, La scuola di Epicuro, suppl. 1 (Naples).Google Scholar

Smith, W. D. (1979) The Hippocratic Tradition, Cornell Publications in the History of Science (Ithaca, N.Y./London).Google Scholar

Sollenberger, M. G. (1992) ‘The lives of the Peripatetics: an analysis of the contents and structure of Diogenes Laertius' “Vitae philosophorum” book 5’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.6 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Sorabji, R., ed. (1990) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (London).Google Scholar

Spanneut, M. (1957) Le Stoïcisme des Pères de l'Eglise de Clément de Rome à Clément d'Alexandrie (Paris).Google Scholar

Staden, H. von (1982) ‘Hairesis and heresy: the case of the haireseis iatrikai’, in Meyer, B. F. & Sanders, E. P., edd., Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, 3: Self-Definition in the Graeco-Roman World (London).Google Scholar

Staden, H. von, ed. (1989) Herophilus, The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Staden, H. von (1991) ‘Galen as historian: his use of sources on the Herophileans’, in López Férez, J. A., ed., Galeno: Obra, pensamiento e influencia (Madrid).Google Scholar

Steinmetz, P. (1990) ‘Planung und Planänderung der philosophischen Schriften Ciceros’, in Steinmetz, P., ed., Beiträge zur hellenistischen Literatur und ihrer Rezeption in Rom (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Throm, H. (1932) Die Thesis (Paderborn).Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. L. (1996) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul, Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III, PhA 68 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Timpanaro, S. (1972) ‘Friedrich Schlegel e gli inizi della linguistica indoeuropea in Germania’, Critica Storica N.S. 10, 72–105, rev. transl. in Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Ser. 1, Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, vol. I (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Todd, R. B. (1976) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A Study of the De mixtione with Preliminary Essays, Text, Translation and Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar

Trillitzsch, W. (1971) Seneca im literarischen Urteil der Antike. Darstellung und Sammlung der Zeugnisse, 2 vols. (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Usener, H., ed. (1887) Epicurea (Leipzig; repr. Stuttgart 1966).Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1986) ‘Tradizione e verità. Forme della storiografia filosofico-scientifica nel De placitis di Galeno’, in Cambiano, G., ed., Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica (Turin).Google Scholar

Wehrli, F., ed. (1978) Sotion, Die Schule des Aristoteles, Suppl. Bd. 2 (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-MoellendorffU., von U., von (1881) Antigonos von Karystos (Berlin; repr. 1965).Google Scholar

Wilson, N. G. (1983) Scholars of Byzantium (London).Google Scholar

Woltjer, J. (1877) ‘Lucretii philosophia cum fontibus comparata’ (dissertation Groningen; repr. in Greek and Roman Philosophy 45, New York/London 1987).Google Scholar

Wotke, K., ed. (1888) ‘Epikurische Spruchsammlung’, WS 10 (1888).Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - Sources

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive