Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:16:10.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited in the Text

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Edited by
E. J. Kenney  and
W. V. Clausen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Classical Literature , pp. 940 - 958
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, K. (1967). Bauformen in Senecas Dialogen. Heidelberg.
Adams, J. N. (1973). ‘The vocabulary of the speeches in Tacitus' historical works’, B.I.C.S. 20: 124–44.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. (1976). Lucan, an introduction. New York.
Allen, W. (1972). ‘Ovid's cantare and Cicero's Cantores Euphorionis’, T.A.Ph.A. 103: 1–14.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1973). Accent and rhythm: prosodic features of Latin and Greek. Cambridge.
Altevogt, H. (1952). Labor improbus. Münster, Westf.
Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. and Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979). ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, J.R.S. 69: 125–55.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1964). Anger in Juvenal and Seneca. Berkeley.
Anderson, W. B. (1933). ‘Gallus and the Fourth Georgic’, C.Q. 27: 36–45, 73.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1961). ‘Venusina Lucerna. The Horatian model for Juvenal’, T.A.Ph.A. 92: 1–12.Google Scholar
André, J. (1949). Étude sur les termes de couleur dans la langue latine. Paris.
André, J.-M. (1967). Mécène. Essai de biographie spirituelle. Paris.
Anliker, K. (1960). Prologe und Akteinteilung in Senecas Tragödien. Bern & Stuttgart.
Arnheim, M. T. W. (1972). The senatorial aristocracy in the later Roman Empire. Oxford.
Arnott, W. G. (1970). ‘Phormio Parasitus’, G. & R. n.s. 17: 32–57.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1972). ‘Targets, techniques, and tradition in Plautus' Stichus’, B.I.C.S. 19: 54–79.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1975). Menander, Plautus, and Terence. Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics ix. Oxford.
Arns, E. (1953). La technique du livre d'après Saint Jérôme. Paris.
Astin, A. E. (1967). Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.
Auerbach, E. (1953). Mimesis, tr. Trask, W. R.. Princeton.
Austin, R. G. (1961). ‘Virgil, Aeneid 2.567–88’, C.Q. n.s. 11: 185f.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1964). (ed.). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber secundus. Oxford.
Axelson, B. (1945). Unpoetische Wörter. Lund.
Axelson, B. (1958). ‘Der Mechanismus des ovidischen Pentameterschlusses: eine mikro-philologische Causerie’, in Herescu, (1958) 121–35.
Axelson, B. (1967). Korruptelenkull: Studien zur Textkritik der unechten Seneca- Tragödie Hercules Oetaeus. Lund.
Aymard, J. (1951). Quelques séries de comparaisons chez Lucain. Montpellier.
Badian, E. (1966). ‘The early historians’, in Dorey, T. A. (ed.), Latin historians 1–38. London.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1970). Titus Quinctius Flamininus: Philhellenism and Realpolitik. Lectures in Memory of Louisa Taft Semple, Second Series. Cincinnati.
Badian, E. (1971).‘Ennius and his Friends’, in Ennius., Entretiens Hardt xvii 149–208. Geneva.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1935). Religion in Virgil. Oxford.
Barchiesi, M. (1962). Nevio epico. Turin.
Bardon, H. (1940). Les empereurs et les lettres latines d'Auguste à Hadrien. Paris.
Bardon, H. (1956). La littérature latine inconnue. ii. L'époque impériale. Paris.
Barlow, C. W. (1938). (ed.). Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam quae vocantur. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy x. Rome.
Barnes, J. W. B. and Lloyd-Jones, H. (1963). ‘Un nuovo frammento papiraceo dell' elegia ellenistica’, S.I.F.C. 35: 205–27.Google Scholar
Bayet, J. (1930). ‘Les premières “Géorgiques” de Virgile’, R.Ph. 3me sér. 4: 128–50; 227–47.Google Scholar
Bayet, J. (1955). ‘Un procédé virgilien: la déscription synthétique dans les Géorgiques’, in Studi in onore di G. Funaioli 9–18. Rome.Google Scholar
Beare, W. (1964). The Roman stage. 3rd edn. London.
Beazley, J. D. (1951). The development of Attic black-figure. Berkeley.
Bentley, R. (1726). ‘De metris Terentianis schediasma’, in P. Terenti Afri Comoediae i–xix. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Besslich, S. (1973).‘Die “Hörner” des Buches. Zur Bedeutung von cornua im antiken Buchwesen’, Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 44–50.Google Scholar
Bickel, E. (1950). ‘De elegis in Maecenatem, monumentis biographicis et historicis’, Rh. Mus. 93: 97–133.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. (1942–50). Storia della letteratura latina. 3 vols. Florence.
Birt, T. (1882). Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur mit Beiträgen zur Textgeschichte des Theokrit, Catull, Properz und anderer Autoren. Berlin.
Birt, T. (1913). Kritik und Hermeneutik nebst Abriss des antiken Buchwesens. Munich.
Blakeney, E. H. (1933). Ausonius. The Mosella. London.
Bolgar, R. (1954). The Classical heritage and its beneficiaries. Cambridge.
Bonner, S. F. (1949). Roman declamation in the late Republic and early Empire. Liverpool.
Bonner, S. F. (1977). Education in ancient Rome from the elder Cato to the younger Pliny. London.
Bourgery, A. (1922). Sénèque prosateur. Paris.
Bowersock, G. W. (1971). ‘A date in the Eighth Eclogue’, H.S.C.Ph. 75: 73–80.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1929). ‘Some Ennian phrases in the Aeneid’, C.Q. 23: 65f.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1933–4). ‘Aeneas and the Stoic Ideal’, G. & R. 3: 8f.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1955).‘M. Fulvius Nobilior et le dieu ineffable’, R.Ph. 29: 172–92.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1970). Études sur l' humanisme cicéronien. Collection Latomus cxxi. Brussels.
Bramble, J. C. (1974). Persius and the programmatic satire: a study inform and imagery. Cambridge.
Brisset, J. (1964). Les idées politiques de Lucain. Paris.
Brooks, C. and Warren, R. P. (1960). Understanding poetry. 3rd edn. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto.
Brower, R. A. (1959). Alexander Pope: the poetry of allusion. Oxford.
Brunt, P. A. (1963). Review of Meyer, H. D., Die Aussenpolitik des Augustus und die Augusteische Dichtung (Cologne 1961). J.R.S. 53: 170–6.
Buchheit, V. (1962). Studien zum Corpus Priapeorum. Zetemata xxviii. Munich.
Büchner, K. (1936). Beobachtungen über Vers- und Gedankengang bei Lukrez. Hermes, Einzelschrift i. Berlin.
Büchner, K. (1955). ‘P. Vergilius Maro’, Real-Encyclopädie viiia. Sep. publ. 1956.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1961). ‘Überlieferungsgeschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Altertums’, in Geschichte der Textüberlieferung i. Zürich.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1964). Cicero: Bestand und Wandel seiner geistigen Welt. Heidelberg.
Bühler, W. (1960). Die Europa des Moschos. Wiesbaden.
Bulloch, A. W. (1973). ‘Tibullus and the Alexandrians’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 19: 85ff.Google Scholar
Burck, E. (1929). ‘Die Komposition von Vergils Georgica’, Hermes 64: 279–321.Google Scholar
Burr, V. (1959). ‘Editionstechnik’, Reallexicon für Antike und Christentum (Stuttgart, 1941–) iv 597–610.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. (1909). Post-Augustan poetry from Seneca to Juvenal. Oxford.
Cairns, F. J. (1969). ‘Propertius 1.18 and Callimachus' Acontius and Cydippe’, C.R. n.s. 19: 131–4.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. J. (1972). Generic composition in Greek and Roman poetry. Edinburgh.
Callmer, C. (1944). ‘Antike Bibliotheken’, Acta Inst. Rom. regni Sueciae 10: 145–93.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1964). ‘Literary allusions in the Historia Augusta’, Hermes 92: 363–77.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1970). Claudian: poetry and propaganda at the court of Honorius. Oxford.
Cameron, A. (1976). Circus factions. Blues and Greens at Rome and Byzantium. Oxford.
Camps, W. A. (1954). ‘A note on the structure of the Aeneid’, C.Q. n.s. 4: 214f.Google Scholar
Camps, W. A. (1959). ‘A second note on the structure of the Aeneid’, C.Q. n.s. 9: 53f.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (1969). ‘Zur Geschichte des Aedes (Herculis) Musarum auf dem Marsfeld’, M.D.A.I. (R.) 76: 323–8.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (1970). ‘Die Statue des L. Accius im Tempel der Camenen’, in Albrecht, M. and Heck, E. (eds.), Silvae: Festschrift für E. Zinn zum 60. Geburtstag 7–17. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Canter, H. V. (1925). Rhetorical elements in the tragedies of Seneca. University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature x.i. Urbana.
Caplan, H. (1954). (ed.). Rhetorica ad Herennium. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass. (1970). On eloquence. Cornell.
Cavenaile, R. (1958). (ed.). Corpus papyrorum Latinorum. Wiesbaden.
Cèbe, J.-P. (1960). ‘Le niveau culturel du public plautinien’, R.E.L. 38: 101–6.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. (1908). Studien zu Lucilius. Leipzig.
Cizek, E. (1972). L'époque de Néron et ses controverses idéologiques. Roma Aeterna iv. Leiden.
Clarke, M. L. (1953). Rhetoric at Rome: a historical survey. London.
Classen, C. J. (1968). ‘Poetry and rhetoric in Lucretius’, T.A.Ph.A. 99: 77–118.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1959). A. Persi Flacci et D. lunii Iuvenalis Saturae. Oxford.
Clausen, W. V. (1964). ‘Callimachus and Latin poetry’, G.R.B.S. 5: 181–96.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1972). ‘On the date of the First Eclogue’, H.S.C.Ph. 76: 201–5.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1976a). ‘Virgil and Parthenius’, H.S.C.Ph. 80: 179.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1976b). ‘Ariadne's leave-taking: Catullus 64.116–20’, Ill.Cl.S. 2: 219–23.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1976c). ‘Catulli Veronensis Liber’, C.Ph. 71: 37–43.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1976d). ‘Virgil and Juvenal’, H.S.C.Ph. 80: 181–6.Google Scholar
Clift, E. H. (1945). Latin pseudepigrapha. Baltimore.
Coffey, M. (1957). ‘Seneca tragedies, 1922–1955’, Lustrum 2: 113–86.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. (1976). Roman satire. London & New York.
Cole, A. T. (1972). ‘The Saturnian verse’, Y.Cl.S. 21: 3–73.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. G. G. (1962). ‘Gallus, the Bucolics, and the ending of the Fourth Georgic’, A.J.Ph. 83: 55–71.Google Scholar
Conington, J. (1881). P. Vergilii Maronis Opera 1. London.
Costa, C. D. N. (1973). (ed.). Horace. London.
Crowther, N. B. (1971). ‘Valerius Cato, Furius Bibaculus, and Ticidas’, C.Ph. 66: 108–9.Google Scholar
Crump, M. M. (1920). The growth of the Aeneid. Oxford.
Dahlmann, H. (1951). ‘Zur Überlieferung über die “altrömischen Tafellieder”’, A.A.M. 17: 1191ff.Google Scholar
D'Alton, J. F. (1931). Roman literary theory and criticism. London.
Day Lewis, C. (1966). The Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid of Virgil. (Trans.) Oxford.
De Decker, J. (1913). Juvenalis declamans. Ghent.
De Lacy, P. (1948). ‘Lucretius and the history of Epicureanism’, T.A.Ph.A. 79: 12–23.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1957). ‘Process and value: an Epicurean dilemma’, T.A.Ph.A. 88: 114–26.Google Scholar
Derow, P. S. (1973). ‘The Roman calendar, 190–168 B.C.’, Phoenix 27: 345–56.Google Scholar
Devoto, J. (1954). Tabulae Iguvinae. Rome.
Dickinson, R.J. (1973). ‘The Tristia: poetry in exile’, in Binns, J. W. (ed.), Ovid 154–90. London.Google Scholar
Dilke, O. A. W. (1960), (ed.). Lucan book VII. Revision of Postgate's edition (Cambridge 1913). Cambridge.
Doblhofer, E. (1966). Die Augustuspanegyrik des Horaz in formalhistorischer Sicht. Heidelberg.
Dorey, T. A. (1965). (ed.). Cicero. Studies in Latin literature and its influence. London.
Douglas, A. E. (1966). M. Tullii Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford.
Douglas, A. E. (1968). Cicero. Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics ii. Oxford.
Douglas, A. E. (1973). ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica: a study in method’ in Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.3 95–138. Berlin & New York.Google Scholar
Douglas, F. L. (1929). A study of the Moretum. New York.
Drabkin, I. E. (1930). The Copa. New York.
Drew, D. L. (1923). ‘The Copa’, C.Q. 17: 73–81.Google Scholar
Drew, D. L. (1925). ‘The Copa–ii’, C.Q. 19: 37–42.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1932/3). Plautinische Akzentstudien. 2 vols. Breslau.
Drexler, H. (1967). Einführung in die römische Metrik. Darmstadt.
Drexler, H. (1969). Die Iambenkürzung. Hildesheim.
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le M. (1976). ‘Vergil's Fourth Eclogue’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 1976. ARCA 2. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Duckett, E. S. (1925). Catullus in English poetry. Smith College Class. Stud. vi. Northampton, Mass.
Duckworth, G. E. (1952). The nature of Roman comedy. Princeton.
Duckworth, G. E. (1954). ‘The architecture of the Aeneid’, A.J.Ph. 75: 1f.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1957). ‘The Aeneid as a trilogy’, T.A.Ph.A. 88: 1f.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1959). ‘Virgil's Georgics and the Laudes Galli’, A.J.Ph. 80: 225–37.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1962). Structural patterns and proportions in Vergil's Aeneid. Michigan.
Duckworth, G. E. (1969). Vergil and classical hexameter poetry: a study in metrical variety. Ann Arbor.
Due, O. S. (1962). ‘An essay on Lucan’, Class, et Med. 22: 68–132.Google Scholar
Duff, J. D. (1928). (ed.). Lucan. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Dziatzko, K. (1899a). ‘Buch’, Pauly, A.–Wissowa, G.–Kroll, W., Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) iii 939–71.Google Scholar
Dziatzko, K. (1899b).‘Buchhandel’, Pauly, A.–Wissowa, G.–Kroll, W., Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) iii 973–85.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, L. (1936). Exkurse und Ekphraseis bei Lucan. Heidelberg.
Edwards, M. W. (1960). ‘The expression of Stoic ideas in the Aeneid’, Phoenix 14: 151f.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1927). Introduction to Seneca his tenne tragedies translated into English, edited by Newton, Thomas, anno 1581. London & New York.
Elliott, R. C. (1960). The power of satire, magic, ritual, art. Princeton.
Ellis, R. (1891). Noctes Manilianae. Oxford.
Enk, P. J. (1918). (ed.). Gratti Cynegeticon quae supersunt. 2 vols. Zutphen.
Enk, P. J. (1919). ‘De Lydia et Diris carminibus’, Mnemosyne n.s. 47: 382–409.Google Scholar
Enk, P. J. (1953).‘The Latin accent’, Mnemosyne 4.6: 93–109.Google Scholar
Enmann, H. (1884). Eine verlorene Geschichte der römischen Kaiser und das Buch De viris illustribus urbis Romae. Philologus Suppl. IV 337–501.
Ewbank, W. W. (1933). (ed.). The poems of Cicero. London.
Fairclough, H. R. (1934). (ed.). Virgil II: Aeneid VI–XII and the minor poems. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Fedeli, P. (1972). ‘Sulla prima bucolica di Virgilio’, G.I.F. 24: 273–300.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1975). Utopias of the classical world. London.
Fiske, G. C. (1920). Lucilius and Horace. Madison.
Fraenkel, E. (1922). Plautinisches im Plautus. Berlin.
Fraenkel, E. (1927). ‘Zur Vorgeschichte des versus quadrants’, Hermes 62: 357–70.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1928). Iktus und Akzent im lateinischen Sprechvers. Berlin.
Fraenkel, E. (1937). Review of Pasquali (1936), in J.R.S. 27: 262ff.
Fraenkel, E. (1951a). ‘Additional notes on the prose of Ennius’, Eranos 49: 50ff.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1951b). ‘The pedigree of the Saturnian metre’, Eranos 49: 170f.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1956). ‘Catulls Trostgedicht für Calvus’, W.S. 69: 279–88.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1957). Horace. Oxford.
Fraenkel, E. (1960). Elementi plautini in Plauto, tr. Munari, F.. Florence. (Rev. version of Plautinisches im Plautus. Berlin 1922.)Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1964). Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie. 2 vols. Rome.
Fraenkel, E. (1966). ‘The Dirae’, J.R.S. 56: 142–55.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1968). Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos. Sussidi eruditi xxii. Rome.
Frank, T. (1928). Catullus and Horace. Oxford.
Fraser, P. M. (1972). Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Oxford.
Friedländer, L. (1886). (ed.). M. Valeri Martialis Epigrammaton Libri. 2 vols. Leipzig.
Friedländer, L. (1908–28). Roman life and manners under the early Empire, tr. Magnus, L. A., Freese, J. H., Gough, A. B.. 4 vols. London.
Friedländer, P. (1912). Johannes von Gaza und Paulus Silentiarius. Leipzig & Berlin.
Friedrich, W. H. (1933). Untersuchungen zu Senecas dramatischer Technik. Leipzig.
Friedrich, W. H. (1954). ‘Sprache und Stil des Hercules Oetaeus’, Hermes 82: 51–84. Repr. in Lefèvre (1972) 500–44.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (1946). The poems of Robert Frost. New York.
Furley, D. J. (1966). ‘Lucretius and the Stoics’, B.I.C.S. 13: 13–33.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1956). Appiano e la storia delle guerre civile. Florence.
Gaiser, K. (1970). ‘Die plautinischen Bacchides und Menanders Dis exapaton’, Philologus 114: 51–87.Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. (1972).‘Zur Eigenart der römischen Komödie: Plautus und Terenz gegenüber ihren griechischen Vorbildern’, Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.2 1027–1113.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. (1975). Ovid's Metamorphoses: an introduction to the basic aspects. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Galletier, E. (1920). Epigrammata et Priapea. Paris.
Garson, R. W. (1964). ‘Some critical observations on Valerius Flaccus' Argonautica, 1’, C.Q. n.s. 14: 267–79.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. (1911). ‘Studien zur griechischen Satire’, Neue Jahrbücher für das klassiche Altertum 27: 393–411, 469–93.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1968). Caesar, tr. Needham, P.. Cambridge, Mass.
Georgii, H. (1891). Die antike Äneiskritik. Stuttgart.
Getty, R. J. (1955). (ed.). M. Annaei Lucani De bello ciuili Liber I. Corr. repr. Cambridge.
Giancotti, F. (1959). Il preludio di Lucrezio. Messina, Florence.
Giardina, I. C. (1966). L. Annaei Senecae tragoediae. 2 vols. Bologna.
Gigon, O. (1938). ‘Bemerkungen zu Senecas Thyestes’, Philologus 93: 176–83.Google Scholar
Giussani, C. (1896). Studi lucreziani. Turin.
Gomme, A. W. (1937). ‘Menander’, in Essays in Greek history and literature 249–95. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (1971). ‘The Dirae’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 17: 30–43.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1970). ‘Servius and the Helen Episode’, H.S.C.Ph. 74: 101f.Google Scholar
Gossage, A. J. (1972). ‘Statius’, in Neronians and Flavians: Silver Latin 1. Greek and Latin Studies, ed. Dudley, D. R.. London.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. (1950). (ed.). Theocritus. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Gow, A. S. F. (1952). (ed.). Theocritus. 2 vols. 2nd edn. Cambridge.
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1965). (eds.). Hellenistic epigrams. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Gow, A. S. F. (1968). (eds.). The Greek Anthology. The Garland of Philip. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Granrud, J. E. (1913). ‘Was Cicero successful in the art oratorical?’, C.J. 8: 234–43.Google Scholar
Grant, M. A. (1924). Ancient rhetorical theories of the laughable. Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature xxi. Madison.
Green, P. (1967). Juvenal, the sixteen satires. (Trans.) Harmondsworth.
Grenade, P. (1950). ‘Le mythe de Pompée et les Pompéiens sous les Césars’, R.E.A. 52: 28–67.Google Scholar
Gresseth, G. K. (1957). ‘The quarrel between Lucan and Nero’, C.Ph. 52: 24–7.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1979). ‘The Fourth Georgic, Virgil and Rome’, G. & R. n.s. 26: 61–8.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. G. (1969). ‘Juvenal, Statius, and the Flavian establishment’, G. & R. n.s. 16: 134–50.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1949). ‘L'episode d'Antée dans la Pharsale’, Latomus 8: 55–61.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1960). ‘L'éloge de Néron au début de la Pharsale’, R.E.L. 38: 296–305.Google Scholar
Grisart, A. (1959). ‘La publication des “Métamorphoses”: une source du récit d'Ovide (Tristes 1, 7, 11–40)’, in Atti del convegno Internazionale ovidiano II 125–56. Rome.Google Scholar
Gronovius, J. F. (1661). (ed.). L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae. Leiden.
Gronovius, J. F. (1682). (ed.). L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae. 2nd edn. rev. Gronovius, J.. Amsterdam.
Grube, G. M. A. (1965). The Greek and Roman critics. London.
Guillemin, A.-M. (1937). Le public et la vie littéraire à Rome. Paris.
Guillemin, A.-M. (1951). ‘L'inspiration virgilienne dans la Pharsale’, R.E.L. 29: 214–27.Google Scholar
Gwynn, A. (1926). Roman education from Cicero to Quintilian. Oxford.
Haase, F. (1852). (ed.). L. Annaei Senecae Opera quae supersunt. 3 vols. Leipzig.
Haffter, H. (1934). Untersuchungen zur altlateinischen Dichtersprache. Berlin.
Haffter, H. (1935). Die altlateinische Dichtersprache. Problemata x. Leipzig.
Hafner, G. (1968). Das Bildnis von Q. Ennius. Baden-Baden.
Haines, C. R. (1919). (ed.). The correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Handley, E. W. (1968). Menander and Plautus. London.
Harder, R. (1929). ‘Über Cicero's “Somnium Scipionis”’, Königsb. Abh., Geistesw. Kl. Heft III, 115–l50 = Kleine Schriften, ed. Marg, W. (1960) 354–95. Munich.Google Scholar
Harding, D. P. (1962). The club of Hercules. Urbana.
Haupt, M. (1875). Opuscula i. Leipzig.
Haupt, M. (1876). Opuscula iii. Leipzig.
Haury, A. (1955). Ironie et humour chez Cicéron. Leiden.
Helm, R. (1934). ‘Die Praetexta Octavia’, Sitz.-Ber. Berlin 283–347.Google Scholar
Helm, R. (1954). ‘Praetexta’, Pauly, A.–Wissowa, G.–Kroll, W., Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) xliv 1569–75.Google Scholar
Henry, J. (1873–89). Aeneidea, or critical, exegetical, and aesthetical remarks on the Aeneis. 4 vols. London, Edinburgh & Dublin.
Herescu, N. I. (1958). (ed.). Ovidiana: recherches sur Ovide. Paris.
Herington, C. J. (1961). ‘Octavia praetexta: a survey’, C.Q. n.s. 11: 18–30. Repr. in Lefèvre (1972) 376–401.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1966). ‘Senecan tragedy’, Arion 5: 422–71.Google Scholar
Herrmann, L. (1924). Le théâtre de Sénèque. Paris.
Heseltine, M. (1913). (ed.). Petronius. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Highet, G. (1954). Juvenal the satirist. Oxford.
Highet, G. (1972). The speeches in Vergil's Aeneid. Princeton.
Holleman, A. W. J. (1971). ‘Ovid and politics’, Historia 20: 458–66.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1970). (ed.). Ovid, Metamorphoses Book VIII. Oxford.
Hollis, A. S. (1973). ‘Aemilius Macer, Alexipharmaca?’, C.R. n.s. 23: 11.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1977). ‘L. Varius Rufus, De Morte (Frs. 1–4 Morel)’, C.Q. n.s. 27: 187–96.Google Scholar
Hornsby, R. A. (1970). Patterns of action in the Aeneid. Iowa.
Horsfall, N. M. (1969). ‘Aclys and Cateia’, Class. et. Med. 30: 297–9.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1976). ‘The Collegium Poetarum’, B.I.C.S. 23: 79–95.Google Scholar
Hosius, C. (1893). ‘Lucan und seine Quellen’, Rh. Mus. 48: 380–97.Google Scholar
Hosius, C. (1922). (ed.). Octavia Praetexta cum elementis commentarii. Bonn.
Housman, A. E. (1903–30). M. Manilii Astronomicon Libri. 5 vols. Cambridge. (Repr. in 2 vols. Olms 1972.)
Housman, A. E. (1972). Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F. R. D., (eds.). The classical papers of A. E. Housman. 3 vols. Cambridge.
Hubaux, J. (1930). ‘Une Epode d'Ovide’, Serta Leodiensia 187–245. Liège.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. (1969). ‘The Oedipus of Seneca’ (poetic translation), Arion 7: 324–71.Google Scholar
Humbert, J. (1925). Les plaidoyers écrits et les plaidoiries réelles de Cicéron. Paris.
Hunt, H. A. K. (1954). The humanism of Cicero. Melbourne.
Ihm, M. (1893). ‘Die Bibliotheken im alten Rom’, Centralbl.für Bibliothekswesen 10: 513–32.Google Scholar
Immisch, O. (1923). ‘Zur Frage der plautinischen Cantica’, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie (Phil.-Hist. Kl.) 14: 7. Abhandlung 41.Google Scholar
Jahn, O. (1851a). (ed.). Junii Juvenalis Saturarum libri V. Berlin.
Jahn, O. (1851b). ‘Über die Subscriptionen in den Handschriften römischer Classiker’, Ber. d. sächs. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Leipzig (Phil. -Hist. Kl.) 3: 327–72.Google Scholar
Jahn, P. (1908). ‘Vergil und die Ciris’, Rh. Mus. 63: 79–106.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (1963). La guerre civile à Rome. Paris.
Jellicoe, S. (1968). The Septuagint and modern study. Oxford.
Jocelyn, H. D. (1964). ‘Ancient scholarship and Virgil's use of republican Latin poetry. I’, C.Q. n.s. 14: 280–95.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1969). ‘The poet Cn. Naevius, P. Cornelius Scipio, and Q. Caecilius Metellus’, Antichthon 3: 32–47.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1972). ‘The poems of Quintus Ennius’, Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.2 987–1026.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1973). ‘Greek poetry in Cicero's prose writings’, Y.Cl.S. 23: 61–111.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1973). ‘The emotions of patriotism: Propertius 4.6’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 6: 151–80.Google Scholar
Jordan, H. (1860). M. Catonis praeter librum de re rustica quae extant. Leipzig.
Juhnke, H. (1972). Homerisches in römischer Epik flavischer Zeit: Untersuchungen zu Szenennachbildungen und Strukturentsprechungen in Statius' Thebais und Achilleis und in Silius' Punica. Zetemata liii. Munich.
Kennedy, G. (1972). The art of rhetoric in the Roman world, 300 B.C. to A.D. 300. Princeton.
Kenney, E. J. (1963). Review of Buchheit (1962), in C.R. n.s. 13: 72–4.
Kenney, E. J. (1965). ‘The poetry of Ovid's exile’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 11: 37–49.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1970a). ‘Doctus Lucretius’, Mnemosyne 4.23: 366–92.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1970b). ‘Love and legalism: Ovid, Heroides 20 and 21’, Arion 9: 388–414.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1973). ‘The style of the Metamorphoses’, in Binns, J. W. (ed.), Ovid 116–53. London.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1976). ‘Ovidius prooemians’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 22: 46–53.Google Scholar
Kenyon, F. G. (1951). Books and readers in ancient Greece and Rome. 2nd edn. Oxford.
Keseling, P. (1941). ‘Horaz in den Tragödien des Seneca’, Philologische Wochenschrift 61: 190–2.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. A. (1977). ‘Virgil's voyage’, Prudentia 9: 97–103.Google Scholar
Kienast, D. (1954). Cato der Zensor. Heidelberg.
Kirkwood, G. M. (1961). ‘The authorship of the Strasbourg Epodes’, T.A.Ph.A. 92: 267–82.Google Scholar
Kleberg, T. (1967). Buchhandel und Verlagswesen in der Antike. Darmstadt.
Kleve, K. (1969). ‘Lucrèce, l'épicurisme et l'amour’, Actes du viii Congrè G. Budé 376–83.Google Scholar
Klingner, F. (1963). Virgils Georgica. Zurich & Stuttgart.
Klotz, A. (1947). ‘Zur Verskunst des römischen Dramas’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 2: 301–57.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. N. (1964). Die Aeneis und Homer. Göttingen.
Knight, W. F. Jackson (1939). Accentual symmetry in Vergil. Oxford.
Knight, W. F. (1966). Roman Vergil. 2nd edn. London.
Knoche, U. (1975). Roman satire, tr. Ramage, E. S.. Bloomington.
Knowles, M. D. (1958). ‘The preservation of the classics’, in The English library before 1700. London.Google Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. (1968). ‘Silent reading in antiquity’, G.R.B.S. 9: 421–35.Google Scholar
Koep, L. (1954). ‘Buch 1 (technisch)’, Reallexicon für Antike und Christentum (Stuttgart, 1941–) II 664–88.Google Scholar
Kost, K. (1971). Musaios, Hero und Leander. Bonn.
Krenkel, W. (1970). Lucilius, Satiren. Leiden.
Kroll, W. (1926). (ed.). Historia Alexandri Magni (Pseudo-Callisthenes) I: Recensio vetusta. Berlin.
Kroll, W. (1929). C. Valerius Catullus. Stuttgart.
Kruuse, J. (1941). ‘L'originalité artistique de Martial’, Class, et Med. 4: 248–300.Google Scholar
La Cerda, I. L. (1608). P. Vergilii Maronis Bucolica et Georgica. Frankfurt am Main.
Latte, K. (1960). Römische Religionsgeschichte. Munich.
Laughton, E. (1951). ‘The prose of Ennius’, Eranos 2: 35ff.Google Scholar
Laughton, E. (1960). ‘Observations on the style of Varro’, C.Q. n.s. 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
Laurand, L. (1907; 4th edn. 1936–8). Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron. 3 vols. Paris.
Lawall, G. (1966). ‘Apollonius' Argonautica: Jason as anti-hero’, Y.Cl.S. 19: 116–69.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963). Orationis ratio. Amsterdam.
Lefèvre, E. (1972). (ed.). Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt.
Lejay, P. (1925). Plaute. Paris.
Lelièvre, F. J. (1958). ‘Parody in Juvenal and T. S. Eliot’, C.Ph. 53: 22–5.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1878). (ed.). L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae, i (Observationes criticae), ii (critical text). Berlin.
Leo, F. (1897a). Die plautinischen Cantica und die hellenistische Lyrik. Berlin.
Leo, F. (1897b). ‘Die Composition der Chorlieder Senecas’, Rh. Mus. 52: 509–18.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1906). ‘Diogenes bei Plautus’, Hermes 41: 441–6 (= Ausgewählte Kleine Schriften 1, Rome 1960, 185–90).Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1912). Plautinische Forschungen. 2nd edn. Berlin.
Leo, F. (1913). Geschichte der römischen Literatur i: Die archaische Literatur. Berlin.
Levin, H. (1952). Christopher Marlowe: the Overreacher. Cambridge, Mass.
Lewis, C. S. (1936). The allegory of love: a study in medieval tradition. Oxford.
Lewis, C. S. (1942). A preface to Paradise Lost. London, New York & Toronto.
Lewis, N. (1974). Papyrus in classical antiquity. Oxford.
Lindsay, W. M. (1904). Ancient editions of Plautus. Oxford & St Andrews.
Lindsay, W. M. (1907). Syntax of Plautus. Oxford.
Lindsay, W. M. (1922). Early Latin verse. Oxford.
Lişcu, M. O. (1937). L'expression des idées philosophiques chez Cicéron. Paris.
Longi, E. (1955). ‘Tre episodi del poema di Lucano’, in Studi in onore di G. Funaioli 181–8. Rome.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. and Boas, G. (1935). Primitivism and related ideas in antiquity. Baltimore.
Luck, G. (1959). Die römische Liebeselegie. Heidelberg.
Luck, G. (1968). (ed.). P. Ovidius Naso. Tristia. ii. Kommentar. Heidelberg.
Luck, G. (1974). ‘The woman's role in Latin elegiac poetry’, in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), Perspectives of Roman poetry 23ff. University of Texas.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (1961). ‘Die Anordnung des vierten Horazischen Odenbuches’, Mus. Helv. 18: 1–10.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (1968). ‘The originality of Terence and his Greek models’, G.R.B.S. 9: 169–82.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1971). ‘The dating of the Ciris’, C.Q. n.s. 21: 233–53.Google Scholar
Maas, P. and Lloyd-Jones, H. (tr.) (1962). Greek metre. Oxford.
MacCary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (1976). (eds.). Plautus, Casina. Cambridge.
Mackail, J. W. (1930). The Aeneid of Virgil. Oxford.
MacKay, L. A. (1961). ‘The vocabulary of fear in Latin epic poetry’, T.A.Ph.A. 92: 308–16.Google Scholar
Magie, D. (1921–32). (ed.). The Historiae Augustae. 3 vols. London & Cambridge, Mass.
Malcovati, H. (1943). Cicerone e la poesia. Padua.
Malcovati, H. (1955). Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae. 2nd edn. (1st edn. 1930). 3 vols. Turin.
Mariotti, S. (1952). Livio Andronico e la traduzione artistica. Milan.
Mariotti, S. (1955). Il ‘Bellum Poenicum’ el'arte di Nevio. Rome.
Marouzeau, J. (1949). Quelques aspects de la formation du Latin littéraire. Paris.
Marrou, H. I. (1956). A history of education in antiquity, tr. Lamb, G.. London.
Marrou, H. I. (1958). Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique. 4th edn. Paris.
Marti, B. (1945). ‘The meaning of the Pharsalia’, A.J.Ph. 66: 352–576.Google Scholar
Marti, B. (1968). ‘La structure de la Pharsale’, in Lucain, Entretiens Hardt xv 1–50. Geneva.Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. (1976). (ed.). Terence, Adelphoe. Cambridge.
Martini, E. (1933). Einleitung zu Ovid. Prague.
Marx, F. (1904). C. Lucilii carminum reliquiae. 2 vols. Leipzig.
Mason, H. A. (1959). Humanism and poetry in the early Tudor period. London.
Mason, H. A. (1963). ‘Is Juvenal a classic?’, in Sullivan (1963) 93–167.
Matthews, J. (1975). Western aristocracies and Imperial court. Oxford.
Maurois, A. (1957). Les trois Dumas. Paris.
Meillet, A. (1928: 4th edn. 1948). Esquisse d'une histoire de la langue latine. Paris.
Mendell, C. W. (1967). Latin poetry: the age of rhetoric and satire. Hamden.
Mette, H.-J. (1964). ‘Die römische Tragödie’, Lustrum 9: 5–212.Google Scholar
Meuli, K. (1955). ‘Altrömische Maskenbrauch’, Mus.Helv. 12: 206–35.Google Scholar
Meyer, W. (1886). ‘Ueber die Beobachtung des Wortaccentes in der altlateinischen Poesie’, Abhandlungen der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. -Hist. Kl.) 17: 3–120.Google Scholar
Michels, A. K. (1967). The calendar of the Roman Republic. Princeton.
Miniconi, P. J. (1951). Étude des thèmes guerriers de la poèsie greco-romaine. Publ. Fac. Lettr. Algér. 11 sér. 19. Paris.
Miniconi, P. J. (1962). ‘La joie dans l'Éneide’, Latomus 21: 503–11.Google Scholar
Mohrmann, C. (1961). Études sur le latin des Chrétiens. ii: Latin chrétien et médiéval. Rome.
Momigliano, A. (1941). Review of Farrington, B., Science and politics in the ancient world, in J.R.S. 31: 149–57.
Momigliano, A. (1957). ‘Perizonius, Niebuhr and the character of early Roman tradition’, J.R.S. 47: 104–14.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1962). (ed.). The conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the fourth century. Oxford.
Momigliano, A. (1969). ‘Il trapasso fra storiografia antica e storiografia medievale’, Rivista storica italiana 81: 286–303.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1975). Alien wisdom: the limits of Hellenization. Cambridge.
Morford, M. P. O. (1967). The poet Lucan. Oxford.
Motto, A. L. (1970). Seneca sourcebook: guide to the thought of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Amsterdam.
Motto, A. L. (1973). Seneca. New York.
Mountford, J. F. and Schultz, J. T. (1930). Index rerum et nominum in scholiis Servii et Aelii Donati tractatorum. Ithaca, New York.
Müller, G. (1953). ‘Senecas Oedipus als Drama’, Hermes 81: 447–64. (Repr. in Lefevre (1972) 376–401.)Google Scholar
Müller, R. (1969). ‘Lukrez v iioiff und die Stellung der epikureischen Philosophic zum Staat und zu den Gesetzen’, in Jurewicz, O. and Kuch, H. (eds.), Die Krise der griechischen Polis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. (1922). Senecas Werke: Untersuchungen zur Abfassungszeit und Echtheit. Philologus Suppl.-Band xvi, Heft 1.
Mynors, R. A. B. (1958). (ed.). C. Valerii Catulli carmina. Oxford.
Nachmanson, E. (1941). Der griechische Buchtitel. Einige Beobachtungen. Gothenburg.
Nash, E. (1961–2). A pictorial dictionary of ancient Rome. London.
Nettleship, H. (1890). ‘Literary criticism in Latin antiquity’, Journal of Philology 18: 225–70.Google Scholar
Neumeister, C. (1964). Grundsätze der forensischen Rhetorik. Munich.
Newman, J. K. (1967). Augustus and the New Poetry. Collection Latomus lxxxviii. Brussels.
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1963). ‘Persius’, in Sullivan, (1963) 39–71.
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970). A commentary on Horace: Odes Book I. Oxford.
Norden, E. (1898; repr. Stuttgart 1973). Die antike Kunstprosa. 2 vols. Leipzig.
Norden, E. (1913). Agnostos Theos. Berlin.
Norden, E. (1915). Ennius und Vergilius. Kriegsbilder aus Roms grosser Zeit. Leipzig & Berlin.
Norden, E. (1916). (ed.). P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI. Berlin.
Norden, E. (1926). (ed.). P. Vergilius Maro, Aeneis Buch VI. 3rd edn. Leipzig & Berlin.
Norden, E. (1939). Aus altrömischen Priesterbüchem. Lund.
Nougaret, L. (1943). ‘La métrique de Plaute et de Térence’, Mémorial des études latines … offert.… à J. Marouzeau 123–48. Paris.Google Scholar
Nougaret, L. (1948). Traité de métrique latine classique. Paris.
Ogilvie, R. M. (1965). A commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.
Ollfors, A. (1967). Studien zum Aufbau des Hexameters Lucans. Gothenburg.
Opelt, I. (1957).‘Die Seeschlacht vor Massilia bei Lucan’, Hermes 85: 435–45.Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1969). ‘Zu Senecas Phoenissen’, in Lefevre, (1972) 272–85.
Otis, B. (1959). ‘Three problems of Aeneid 6’, T.A.Ph.A. 90: 165f.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1963). Virgil: a study in civilized poetry. Oxford.
Otis, B. (1966). Ovid as an epic poet. Cambridge.
Packard, D. W. (1968). A concordance to Livy. 4 vols. Cambridge, Mass.
Page, D. L. (1940). (ed.). Select papyri iii. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Page, D. L. (1950). (ed.). Select papyri iii. Literary papyri: poetry. Revised repr. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Page, D. L. (1972). ‘Early Hellenistic elegy’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 18: 63–4.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. (1971). ‘A Greek Satyricon?’, B.I.C.S. 18: 53–68.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1936). Preistoria della poesia romana. Florence.
Patin, H. J. G. (1883). Études sur la poèsie latine. 3rd edn. Paris.
Patzer, H. (1955).‘Zum Sprachstil des neoterischen Hexameters’, Mus. Helv. 12: 77–95.Google Scholar
Pearce, T. E. V. (1966). ‘The enclosing word-order in the Latin hexameter’, C.Q. n.s. 16: 140–71, 298–320.Google Scholar
Pearce, T. E. V. (1968). ‘A pattern of word-order in Latin poetry’, C.Q. n.s. 18: 334–54.Google Scholar
Pecchiura, P. (1965). La figura di Catone Uticense nella letteratura latina. Turin.
Peiper, R. and Richter, G. (1902). (eds.). L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae. Leipzig.
Perry, B. E. (1965). Babrius and Phaedrus. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Peter, H. (1901). Der Brief in der römischen Literatur. Leipzig.
Peter, H. (1914). Historicorum Romanorum fragmenta. 2nd edn. Leipzig.
Peterson, W. (1891). (ed.). M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutions oratoriae Liber decimus. Oxford.
Petersson, T. (1920). Cicero: a biography. Berkeley.
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of classical scholarship from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age. Oxford.
Phillips, O. C. (1968). ‘Lucan's Grove’, C.Ph. 62: 296–300.Google Scholar
Philp, R. H. (1968). ‘The manuscript tradition of Seneca's tragedies’, C.Q. n.s. 18: 150–79.Google Scholar
Pichon, R. (1906). Les derniers écrivains profanes. Paris.
Pichon, R. (1912). Les sources de Lucain. Paris.
Pierleoni, G. (1906). ‘Fu poeta Grattius?’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzone Classica 34: 580–97.Google Scholar
Pighi, G. B. (1963). ‘Seneca metrico’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 91: 170–81.Google Scholar
Platnauer, M. (1922). (ed.). Ctaudian. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Platnauer, M. (1951). Latin elegiac verse. A study of the metrical usages of Tibullus, Propertius & Ovid. Cambridge.
Poncelet, R. (1957). Cicéron traducteur de Platon. Paris.
Portalupi, F. (1955). Bruto e i neo-atticisti. Turin.
Posch, S. (1969). Beobachtungen zur Theokritnachwirkung bei Vergil. Comm. Aenipont. xix. Innsbruck.
Pöschl, V. (1950). Die Dichtkunst Virgils: Bild und Symbol in der Aeneis. Innsbruck; tr. Seligson, G., Michigan 1962.
Poultney, J. W. (1959). The Bronze Tables of lguvium. A.P.A. Monograph xviii.
Pound, E. (1918). In The little review, ed. Anderson, M.. Chicago.
Préchac, M. (1934). ‘La date de la naissance de Sénèque’, R.E.L. 11: 360–75.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1960). ‘Catullus 66. 75–88’, C.Ph. 55: 223–8.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1965). The poetry of the Aeneid. Harvard.
Questa, C. (1967). Introduzione alla metrica di Plauto. Rome.
Questa, C. (1970). ‘Alcune strutture sceniche di Plauto e Menandro’, in Ménandre, Entretiens Hardt xvi 181–228. Geneva.Google Scholar
Qyinn, K. (1963). Latin explorations. London.
Qyinn, K. (1965).‘The Fourth Book of the Aeneid: a critical description’, G. & R. n.s. 12: 16f.Google Scholar
Radford, R. S. (1928). ‘Ovid's Carmina furtiva’, Phil. Quart. 7: 45–59.Google Scholar
Radford, R. S. (1930). ‘The Culex and Ovid’, Philologus. 86: 18–66.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1953). Cicéron et l'histoire romaine. Paris.
Raven, D. S. (1965). Latin metre. London.
Rawson, E. (1973). ‘The interpretation of Cicero's “De Legibus’”, Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.4, 334–56. Berlin & New York.Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. (1927/8). ‘Schmerz und Tod in den Tragödien Senecas’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg vii 167–218. (Repr. as monograph with same title, Darmstadt 1963).Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. (1932). Lukrez, seine Gestalt in seinem Gedicht. Neue Wege zur Antike ii.i Leipzig & Berlin. (Repr. (1961) in Kleine Schriften. Munich.)
Reitzenstein, R. (1912). ‘Zur Sprache der lateinischen Erotik’, S.H.A.W. 12: 9–36.Google Scholar
Rennie, W. (1921). ‘Satira tota nostra est’, C.R. 35: 21.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1965). The medieval tradition of Seneca's letters. Oxford.
Reynolds, L. D. and Wilson, N. G. (1974). Scribes and scholars. A guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature. 2nd edn. Oxford.
Rhys Roberts, W. (1901). (ed.). Dionysius of Halicarnassus: the three Literary Letters. Cambridge.
Ribbeck, O. (1865). Der echte und der unechte Juvenal. Berlin.
Ribbeck, O. (1866). Prolegomena critica ad P. Vergili Maronis opera maiora. Leipzig.
Richter, W. (1957). (ed.). Vergil, Georgica (edn. with commentary).
Ricks, C. (1968). (ed.). A. E. Housman. New Jersey.
Rieth, C. (1964). Die Kunst Menanders in den Adelphen des Terenz. Hildesheim.
Rieu, E. V. (1950). Homer, the Iliad. (Trans.) Harmondsworth.
Rist, J. M. (1969). Stoic philosophy. Cambridge.
Roberts, C. H. (1954). ‘The Codex’, P.B.A. 40: 169–204.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. H. (1956). Greek literary hands 350 B.C.–A.D. 400. Corr. repr. Oxford.
Robinson, R. P. (1923). ‘Valerius Cato’, T.A.Ph.A. 54: 98–116.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. (1914). Der griechische Roman. 2nd edn. Leipzig.
Rose, H. J. (1934). A handbook of Greek literature. London.
Rose, K. F. C. (1971). The date and author of the Satyricon. Leiden.
Ross, D. O. jr. (1969a). Style and tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, Mass.
Ross, D. O. jr. (1969b). ‘Nine epigrams from Pompeii (Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (Berlin, 1863–) 4.4966–73)’, Y.Cl.S. 21: 127–42.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. jr. (1975a). Backgrounds to Augustan poetry; Gallus, elegy and Rome. Cambridge.
Ross, D. O. jr. (1975b). ‘The Culex and Moretum as post-Augustan literary parodies’, H.S.C.Ph. 79: 235ff.Google Scholar
Rowell, H. T. (1947).‘The original form of Naevius' Bellum Poenicum’, A. J.Ph. 68: 35ff.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1960a). ‘Horace on the origins of Satire’, Phoenix 14: 36–44.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1960b). ‘Patterns in Horatian lyric’, A.J.Ph. 81: 373–92.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1976). Lines of enquiry: studies in Latin poetry. Cambridge.
Russell, D. A. (1964). ‘Longinus’ on the sublime. Oxford.
Rutz, W. (1965). ‘Lucan 1943–1963’, Lustrum 9: 243–340.Google Scholar
Sabine, G. H. and Smith, H. B. (1929). Cicero on the Commonwealth. Columbus, Ohio.
Saint-Denis, E. (1956). Virgile, Géorgiques (Collection des Universités de France, publiée sous le patronage de l'Association Guillaume Budé (Paris)). Paris.
Sanford, E. M. (1931).‘Lucan and his Roman critics’, C.Ph. 26: 233–57.Google Scholar
Sassoon, S. (1945). Siegfried's journey 1916–1920. London.
Scazzoso, P. (1956). ‘Reflessi misterici nelle Georgiche’, Paideia 11: 5–28.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. and Hosius, C. (1927). Geschichte der römischen Literatur i: Die römische Literatur in der Zeit der Republik. 4th edn. Munich.
Schmid, W. (1944). Review of Mewaldt, J., Der Kampf des Dichters Lukrez gegen die Religion, Gnomon 20: 97–100.
Schöpsdau, K. (1974). ‘Motive der Liebesdichtung in Vergils Dritter Ekloge’, Hermes 102: 268ff.Google Scholar
Schubart, W. (1921). Das Buch bei den Griechen und Römern. 2nd edn. Berlin & Leipzig.
Schulze, K. P. (1898). ‘Ovid Trist. iv.10.43f.’, Rh. Mus. 53: 541–5.Google Scholar
Schutter, K. H. E. (1952). Quibus annis comoediae Plautinae primum actae sint quaeritur. Groningen.
Scivoletto, N. (1966). ‘Quando nacque Seneca?’, G.I.F. 19: 21–31.Google Scholar
Scott, I. G. (1927). The grand style in the satires of Juvenal. Northampton, Mass.
Scriverius, P. (1621). (ed.). L. Annaeus Seneca Tragicus. 2 vols. Leiden.
Segal, C. (1966). ‘Orpheus and the Fourth Georgic’, A.J.Ph. 87: 307–25.Google Scholar
Seitz, K. (1965). ‘Der pathetische Erzählstil Lucans’, Hermes 93: 204ff.Google Scholar
Sellar, W. V. (1889). The Roman poets of the Republic. 3rd edn. Oxford.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70). (ed.). Cicero's Letters to Atticus. 7 vols. Cambridge.
Sherk, R. K. (1969). Roman documents from the Greek East: Senatus consulta and Epistulae to the age of Augustus. Baltimore.
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: a historical and social commentary. Oxford.
Shipp, G. P. (1953). ‘Greek in Plautus’, W.S. 66: 105–12.Google Scholar
Shipp, G. P. (1955). ‘Plautine terms for Greek and Roman things’, Glotta 34: 139–52.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M. (1967). Studies in the history of Hellenistic drama. London.
Skutsch, O. (1968). Studia Enniana. London.
Skydsgaard, J. E. (1968). Varro the scholar. Copenhagen.
Slater, D. A. (1912). ‘Was the Fourth Eclogue written to celebrate the marriage of Octavia to Mark Antony?’, C.R. 26: 114.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Th. H. (1949). (ed.). Octavia fabula praetexta. Leiden.
Small, S. G. P. (1959). ‘The Arms of Turnus: Aeneid. 7. 783–92’, T.A.Ph.A. 90: 243f.Google Scholar
Smith, K. F. (1913). (ed.). The Elegies of Albius Tibullus. New York.
Solmsen, F. (1948). ‘Propertius and Horace’, C.Ph. 43: 105–9.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. (1926). ‘T. Pomponius Atticus und Ciceros Werke’, Hermes 61: 389–422.Google Scholar
Sparrow, J. (1931). Half-lines and repetitions in Virgil. Oxford.
Speyer, W. (1971). Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum. Ein Versuch ihrer Deutung. Munich.
Steele, R. B. (1933). The Nux, Maecenas and Consolatio ad Liviam. Nashville.
Steyns, D. (1906). Étude sur les métaphores et les comparaisons dans les oeuvres en prose de Sénèque le philosophe. Gand.
Stroh, W. (1968). ‘Ein missbrauchtes Distichon Ovids’, in Albrecht, M. and Zinn, E. (eds.), Ovid 567–80. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1971). Die römische Liebeselegie als werbende Dichtung. Amsterdam.
Strzelecki, L. (1935). De Naeviano ‘Belli Punici’ carmine quaestiones selectae. Krakow.
Suerbaum, W. (1968). Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter, Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Ennius. Hildesheim.
Sullivan, J. P. (1963). (ed.). Critical essays on Roman literature. Satire. London.
Summers, W. C. (1910). Select letters of Seneca. London.
Süss, W. (1965). ‘Cicero: eine Einführung in seine philosophischen Schriften’, Abh. Mainz Geistes- und Sozialw. Kl. 5: 210–385. Wiesbaden 1966.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939). The Roman revolution. Oxford.
Syme, R. (1958). Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford.
Tandoi, V. (1969). ‘Il ricordo di Stazio “dolce poeta” nella sat. 7 di Giovenale’, Maia 21: 102–22.Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. (1932). ‘Alexander Helios and the golden age’, J.R.S. 22: 135–60.Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. (1948). Alexander the Great, I Narrative; II Sources and Studies. Cambridge.
Taylor, L. R. (1937). ‘The opportunities for dramatic performances in the time of Plautus and Terence’, T.A.Ph.A. 68: 284–304.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1949). Party politics in the age of Caesar. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Thompson, L. and Bruère, R. T. (1968). ‘Lucan's use of Virgilian reminiscence’, C.Ph. 63: 1–21.Google Scholar
Thulin, C. (1906). Italische sakrale Poesie und Prosa. Berlin.
Till, R. (1936). Die Sprache Catos. Philologus Suppl.-Band xxviii, Heft 2.
Tillyard, E. M. (1943). The Elizabethan world picture. London.
Townend, G. B. (1961). ‘Traces in Dio Cassius of Cluvius, Aufidius, and Pliny’, Hermes 89: 227–48.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1964). ‘Cluvius Rufus in the Histories of Tacitus’, A.J.Ph. 85: 337–77.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1969). ‘Some problems of punctuation in the Latin hexameter’, C.Q. n.s. 19: 330–44.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1973). ‘The literary substrata to Juvenal's satires’. J.R.S. 63: 148–60.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C. (1971). Death and burial in the Roman world. London.
Traina, A. (1970). Vortit barbare. Le traduzioni poetiche da Livio Andronico a Cicerone. Rome.
Tränkle, H. (1967). ‘Neoterische Kleinigkeiten’, Mus.Helv. 24: 87–103.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. (1967). Phlyax vases. B.I.C.S. Suppl. xix. 2nd edn. London.
Trillitzsch, W. (1971). Seneca im literarischen Urteil der Antike. Darstellung und Sammlung der Zeugnisse. 2 vols. Amsterdam.
Turner, E. G. (1968). Greek papyri: an introduction. Oxford.
Turner, E. G. (1971). Greek manuscripts of the ancient world. Oxford.
Tyrrell, R. Y. and Purser, L. C. (1933). The correspondence of Cicero vi. 2nd edn. Dublin.
Valéry, P. (1962). ‘Variations sur les Bucoliques’, Oeuvres 1: 207–22.Google Scholar
van de Woestijne, P. (1929). ‘Haud mollia iussa’, R.B.Ph. 8: 523–30.Google Scholar
van Groningen, B. A. (1963). ‘Ἔκδοσιζ’, Mnemosyne 4.16: 1–17.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, C. A. (1965). Studies in classical satire and related literary theory. Leiden.
Van Sickle, J. (1975). ‘The new erotic fragment of Archilochus’, Quadri Urbinati di cultura classica 20: 123–56.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1970). ‘Statius and Antimachus: a review of the evidence’, Philologus 114: 118–43.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1972). ‘Aspects of Statius' epithalamion: Silvae 1.2’, Mnemosyne 4.25: 172–87.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1972–3). ‘The myth of Falernus in Silius, Punica 7’, C.J. 68: 240–6.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1973). Statius and the Thebaid. Cambridge.
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1975). ‘Silius Italicus: the shield of Hannibal’, A.J.Ph. 96: 391–405.Google Scholar
Warmington, B. H. (1957). Remains of Old Latin III: Lucilius, The Twelve Tables. 2nd edn. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Waszink, J.-H. (1950). ‘The Proem of the Annales of Ennius’, Mnemosyne 3. 3: 215–40.Google Scholar
Waszink, J.-H. (1972). ‘Zum Anfangsstadium der römischen Literatur’, Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.2, 869–927.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1971). Roman private law around 200 B.C. Edinburgh.
Watts, W. J. (1971). ‘The birthplaces of Latin writers’, G. & R. n.s. 18: 91–101.Google Scholar
Welsford, E. (1935). The Fool, his social and literary history. London.
Wendel, C. (1949). Die griechisch-römische Buchbeschreibung verglichen mit der des Vorderen Orients. Halle.
Wendel, C. (1954). ‘Bibliothek’, Reallexicon für Antike und Christentum (Stuttgart, 1941–) II 664–88.Google Scholar
Wessner, P. (1929). ‘Lucan, Statius und Juvenal bei den römischen Grammatikern’, P.Ph.W. 49: 296–303, 328–35.Google Scholar
West, D. A. (1969). ‘Multiple-correspondence similes in the Aeneid’, J.R.S. 59: 40–9.Google Scholar
Westendorp Boerma, R. E. H. (1949). (ed.). P. Vergili Maronis Catalepton. 2 vols, (vol. 11 1963). Assen.
Westendorp Boerma, R. (1958). ‘Virgil's debt to Catullus’, Acta Classica 1: 55f.Google Scholar
White, P. (1974). ‘The presentation and dedication of the Silvae and the Epigrams’, J.R.S. 64: 40–61.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. (1975). ‘The political background to Ovid's Tristia 2’, C.Q. n.s. 25: 264–71.Google Scholar
Wiesen, D. (1963). ‘Juvenal's moral character, an introduction’, Latomus 22: 440–71.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1924). Hellenistiche Dichtung. 2 vols. Berlin.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1928). Erinnerungen 1848–1914. Leipzig.
Wili, W. (1947). ‘Die literarischen Beziehungen des Properz zu Horaz’, Festschrift Tiéche. Bern.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1955). Ovid recalled. Cambridge.
Wilkinson, L. P. (1963). Golden Latin artistry. Cambridge.
Wilkinson, L. P. (1969). The Georgics of Virgil: a critical survey.
Williams, G. W. (1956). ‘Some problems in the construction of Plautus' Pseudolus’, Hermes 84: 424–55.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1958). ‘Evidence for Plautus' workmanship in the Miles Gloriosus’, Hermes 86: 79–105.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1968). Tradition and originality in Roman poetry. Oxford.
Williams, R. D. (1960), (ed.). Virgil, Aeneid V. Oxford.
Williams, R. D. (1961). ‘The function and structure of Virgil's Catalogue in Aeneid 7’, C.Q. n.s. 11: 146–53.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. (1962). (ed.). Virgil, Aeneid III. Oxford.
Williams, R. D. (1963). ‘Virgil and the Odyssey’, Phoenix 17: 266f.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. (1972). ‘The pageant of Roman heroes’, in Cicero and Virgil: Studies in honour of Harold Hunt. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Williamson, G. (1951). The Senecan amble: prose form from Bacon to Collier. Chicago.
Wimmel, W. (1960). Kallimachos in Rom. Hermes Einzelschrift XVI. Wiesbaden.
Wingo, E. O. (1972). Latin punctuation in the classical age. The Hague & Paris.
Winterbottom, M. (1974). (ed.). The Elder Seneca. Declamations. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London). London & Cambridge, Mass.
Wirszubski, C. (1950). Libertas as a political idea at Rome during the late Republic and early Principate. Cambridge.
Wiseman, T. P. (1969). Catullan questions. Leicester.
Wissowa, G. (1917). ‘Das Prooemium von Vergils Georgica’, Hermes 52: 92–104.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1974). Dancing in chains: the stylistic unity of the comoedia palliata. Papers and monographs of the American Academy in Rome xxv. Rome.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1973). ‘Emendavi ad Tironem: some notes on scholarship in the second century A.D.’, H.S.C.Ph. 77: 215–43.Google Scholar
Zieliński, Th. (1904). Das Clauselgesetz in Ciceros Reden: Grundzüge einer oratorischen Rhythmik. Philologus Suppl. -Band IX 589–875.
Zwierlein, O. (1966). Die Rezitationsdramen Senecas. Meisenheim am Glan.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×