Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PART I READERS AND CRITICS
- PART II EARLY REPUBLIC
- PART III LATE REPUBLIC
- 8 Predecessors
- 9 The new direction in poetry
- 10 Lucretius
- 11 Cicero and the relationship of oratory to literature
- 12 Sallust
- 13 Caesar
- 14 Prose and mime
- PART IV THE AGE OF AUGUSTUS
- PART V EARLY PRINCIPATE
- PART VI LATER PRINCIPATE
- PART VII EPILOGUE
- Appendix of authors and works
- Metrical appendix
- Works Cited in the Text
- Plate Section
- References
8 - Predecessors
from PART III - LATE REPUBLIC
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- PART I READERS AND CRITICS
- PART II EARLY REPUBLIC
- PART III LATE REPUBLIC
- 8 Predecessors
- 9 The new direction in poetry
- 10 Lucretius
- 11 Cicero and the relationship of oratory to literature
- 12 Sallust
- 13 Caesar
- 14 Prose and mime
- PART IV THE AGE OF AUGUSTUS
- PART V EARLY PRINCIPATE
- PART VI LATER PRINCIPATE
- PART VII EPILOGUE
- Appendix of authors and works
- Metrical appendix
- Works Cited in the Text
- Plate Section
- References
Summary
The short poems of Catullus, which he himself calls nugae ‘trifles’ (1.4), confront the critic with a paradox: poetry of obviously major significance and power which belongs formally to a minor genre. Only poems 11 and 51, written in the metre associated with Sappho herself, were entitled to lay claim to real lyric status; Catullus' preferred metres – the elegiac couplet, the hendecasyllabic, the scazon (limping) iambus – belonged outside the grand tradition. Narrative elegy had of course been written by Callimachus, Philetas and Hermesianax; and Propertius in particular (3.1.1) acknowledged Callimachus and Philetas as his masters. It was, however, the short elegiac epigram that first served Roman poets as a model for a new kind of personal poetry, as it eventually became. Aulus Gellius and Cicero have preserved five short epigrams by a trio of accomplished amateurs, Valerius Aedituus, Porcius Licinus and Quintus Lutatius Catulus. These are freely adapted from Hellenistic Greek originals, most of which can be identified in the Greek Anthology. This trio may have been writing as early as 150 B.C.; the fact that they are cited as a group by Gellius does not prove that they formed a literary coterie, but at least it shows that there existed in the latter part of the second century B.C. a class of Roman literati who were actively interested in exploiting the short personal poem in Latin. That this was not a flash in the pan and that this sort of piece continued to be written during the first century is shown by the fragments of nine similar, though less polished compositions unearthed among the Pompeian graffiti. There must have been also continuing stimulation from Greece.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Classical Literature , pp. 173 - 177Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1982