Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Editors
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Overview of the Handbook
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Models and Measures
- Part III Linguistic Theories and Frameworks
- Part IV First Language Processing
- Part V Bilingual Acquisition and Processing
- Part VI Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
- 33 Specific Learning Disorders as a Working Memory Deficit
- 34 A New Perspective on the Connection between Memory and Sentence Comprehension in Children with Developmental Language Disorder
- 35 Working Memory and Childhood Deafness
- 36 Working Memory Training in the Classroom
- 37 Working Memory and Classroom Learning
- 38 Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design for Language Learning
- 39 Working Memory Training
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
38 - Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design for Language Learning
from Part VI - Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Editors
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Overview of the Handbook
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Models and Measures
- Part III Linguistic Theories and Frameworks
- Part IV First Language Processing
- Part V Bilingual Acquisition and Processing
- Part VI Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
- 33 Specific Learning Disorders as a Working Memory Deficit
- 34 A New Perspective on the Connection between Memory and Sentence Comprehension in Children with Developmental Language Disorder
- 35 Working Memory and Childhood Deafness
- 36 Working Memory Training in the Classroom
- 37 Working Memory and Classroom Learning
- 38 Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design for Language Learning
- 39 Working Memory Training
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Cognitive load theory is an instructional theory based on our knowledge of evolutionary psychology and human cognitive architecture. It can be used to provide instructional guidelines for the acquisition of all aspects of a second language by adults and some aspects, primarily reading and writing, of a first language by both children and adults. The theory assumes that knowledge can be divided into biologically primary knowledge that we have evolved to learn easily without conscious effort and biologically secondary knowledge that we have not specifically evolved to learn but can acquire with explicit instruction and conscious effort. Learning to listen to and speak a first language are biologically primary with all other aspects of language learning being biologically secondary. A general cognitive architecture governs the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge. That architecture includes a working memory that is limited in capacity and duration when dealing with novel information but with no known limits when dealing with familiar information transferred from long-term memory. This architecture governs how we learn and accordingly, also determines the effectiveness of instructional designs.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 859 - 880Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R., & Levelt, W. (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 241–256). Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2013). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011Google Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.Google Scholar
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2017). The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 393–405.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dallinger, S., Jonkmann, K., Hollm, J., & Fiege, C. (2016). The effect of content and language integrated learning on students’ English and history competences: Killing two birds with one stone? Learning and Instruction, 41, 23–31.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee, & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35, 213–218.Google Scholar
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council.Google Scholar
De Groot, A., & Gobet, F. (1996). Perception and memory in chess: Heuristics of the professional eye. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Diao, Y., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2007). The effect of written text on learning to comprehend spoken English as a foreign language. American Journal of Psychology, 120, 237–261.Google Scholar
Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007). Redundancy in foreign language reading instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations. Learning and Instruction, 17, 78–88.Google Scholar
Egan, D. E., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory & Cognition, 7, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance; Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., Chinn, C. A., Engelmann, K., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (2018). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The roles of domain-specific and domain-general knowledge. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D. (2014a). Issues in the assessment of bilingually educated students: Expressing subject knowledge through L1 and L2. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D. (2014b). Learning and retaining specialized vocabulary from textbook reading: Comparison of learning outcomes through L1 and L2. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 976–991.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175–199). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Geary, D. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43, 179–195.Google Scholar
Geary, D. (2012). Evolutionary educational psychology. In Harris, K., Graham, S., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 597–621). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Geary, D., & Berch, D. (2016). Evolution and children’s cognitive and academic development. In Geary, D. & Berch, D. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 217–249). Springer.Google Scholar
Hüttner, J., & Smit, U. (2014). CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning): The bigger picture. A response to: A. Bruton (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why…and why not. System, 41, 587–597. System, 44, 160–167.Google Scholar
Jeffries, R., Turner, A., Polson, P., & Atwood, M. (1981). Processes involved in designing software. In Anderson, J. R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 255–283). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jiang, D., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2018). The curious case of improving foreign language listening skills by reading rather than listening: An expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1139–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Human Factors, 46, 567–581.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (2000). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kyun, S., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2013). The effect of worked examples when learning to write essays in English literature. Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (p. 39–52). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2020). Altering element interactivity and variability in example-practice sequences to enhance learning to write Chinese characters. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 837–843.Google Scholar
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51, 36–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moussa-Inaty, J., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Improving listening skills in English as a foreign language by reading rather than listening: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 391–402.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). CLIL classroom discourse: Research from Europe, Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 70–100.Google Scholar
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In Doughty, C., & Long, M. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–662). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roussel, S., Joulia, D., Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2017). Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: A cognitive load theory approach. Learning and Instruction, 52, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussel, S., Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (in press). The advantages of listening to academic content in a second language may be outweighed by disadvantages: A cognitive load theory approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
Roussel, S. (2019). Comprendre un contenu disciplinaire en allemand L2: quels ajustements pédagogiques? Études en didactique des langues (EDL), 32, 89–100Google Scholar
Rumlich, D. (2016). Evaluating bilingual education In Germany. Clil students’ general English proficiency, Efl self-concept and interest. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (p. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spilich, G., Vesonder, G., Chiesi, H., & Voss, J. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (2015). In academe, what is learned and how is it learned? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 190–194.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (2016). Working memory, long-term memory and instructional design. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.Google Scholar
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition & Instruction, 2, 59–89.Google Scholar
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42, 115–121.Google Scholar
Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 434–458.Google Scholar
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.Google Scholar
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292.Google Scholar
Thornton, A., & Raihani, N. (2008). The evolution of teaching. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1823–1836.Google Scholar
Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & Sweller, J. (Eds.). (2020). Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 265–283.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in society, The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1–21.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by