Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:10:05.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Expanding Capabilities through Participatory Action Research

from Part II - Methods, Measurement and Empirical Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

By
Alejandra Boni  and
Alexandre Apsan Frediani
Edited by
Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti ,
Siddiqur Osmani  and
Mozaffar Qizilbash
Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti
Affiliation:
University of Pavia
Siddiqur Osmani
Affiliation:
Ulster University
Mozaffar Qizilbash
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

There is a growing amount of work applying qualitative methods for capability research with the objective of increasing the participation of ‘respondents’ in the production of knowledge. In this chapter we want to go a step further and illustrate how participatory approaches in research can contribute towards investigating which capabilities are valued, why certain choices are made, how capabilities are achieved and the role policy interventions can play in enhancing and generating capabilities, especially for vulnerable and marginalized groups. By drawing on the literature on participatory action research (PAR), we present our own theoretical framework to analyse and inform PAR processes from a human development and capability perspective. We named it the ‘participatory research capability cube’ due to its multidimensional perspective: (1) the expansion of the capabilities and agency of co-researchers; (2) the transformative characteristics of the knowledge produced; and (3) the democratic processes that PAR could enable both during and beyond the research process. Cross-cutting dimensions in our three-dimensional framework are issues of power and diversity. We then apply this framework to understand a PAR process in Kisumu, Kenya. We will conclude with some considerations on the suitability of our framework for a better understanding of PAR from a human development and capability perspective.

Keywords

participatory action researchPAR cubeknowledgedemocracycapabilitiesagency
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach , pp. 477 - 496
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. 2004. ‘The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition’, in Rao, V and Walton, M (eds.). Culture and Public Action. Stanford University Press: 179–195.Google Scholar
Biggeri, M. and Ferrannini, A. 2014. Sustainable Human Development 2014: A New Territorial and People-Centred Perspective. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Boni, A. and Gasper, D. 2012. ‘Rethinking the Quality of Universities: How Can Human Development Thinking Contribute?’ Journal of Human Development and Capabilities XIII/3: 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boni, A. and Walker, M. 2016. Global Human Development: Theoretical and Empirical Insights for Social Change. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, H. 2015. ‘Introduction: How to Situate and Define Action Research’, in Bradbury, H (ed.). The Sage Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, C. and Torre, M. 2007. ‘Beyond the Journal Article: Representations, Audience, and the Presentation of Participatory Action Research’, in Kindon, S, Pain, R and Kesby, M (eds.). Connecting People, Participation and Place: Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. London: Routledge: 196–206.Google Scholar
Clark, D. 2012. ‘Adaptation and Development: Issues, Evidence and Policy Relevance’, in Clark, D (ed.). Adaptation, Poverty and Development: The Dynamics of Subjective Well-Being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conradie, I. and Robeyns, I. 2013. ‘Aspirations and Human Development Interventions’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities XIV/4: 559–580.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. 2005. ‘El “Postdesarrollo” Como Concepto y Práctica Social’ [Post-Development as Concept and Social Practice], in Mato, D (ed.). Políticas de Economía, Ambiente y Sociedad en Tiempos de Globalización [Policies of Economics, Environment and Society in Times of Globalization]. Caracas: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Universidad Central de Venezuela: 17–31.Google Scholar
Fernández-Baldor, A., Boni, A., Lillo, P. and Hueso, A. 2014. ‘Are Technological Projects Reducing Social Inequalities and Improving People’s Well-Being? A Capability Approach Analysis of Renewable Energy-Based Electrification Projects in Cajamarca, Peru’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities XV/1: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frediani, A. A. 2015. ‘“Participatory Capabilities” in Development Practice’. DPU Working Paper 178. Available at: www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/development/case-studies/2015/jun/178-participatory-capabilities-development-practice (accessed 24 February 2020).Google Scholar
Frediani, A. A. and Hirst, L. 2016. ‘Critical Urban Learning through Participatory Photography’, in Campkin, B and Duijzings, G (eds.). Engaged Urbanism: Cities and Methodologies. London: I. B. Tauris: 131–138.Google Scholar
Freire, P. 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Continuum (first published 1970).Google Scholar
Freire, P. 1997. ‘Foreword’, in Smith, S. E., Willms, D. G. and Johnson, N. A. (eds.). Nurtured by Knowledge. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 2006a. ‘Finding Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis’. IDS Bulletin 37/6: 23–33.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 2006b. ‘Triumph, Deficit or Contestation? Deepening the “Deepening Democracy” Debate’. Working paper 264. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. and Cornwall, A. 2008. ‘Power and Knowledge’, in Reason, P and Bradbury, H (eds.). Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd ed. London: Sage: 71–81.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J. and Levin, M. 2007. Introduction to AR: Social Research for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, B. 2005. ‘Reflections on Participatory Research from 1970 to 2005’. Convergence XXXVIII/1: 5–24.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2014. ‘Introduction’, in Ibrahim, S and Tiwari, M (eds.). The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 1–28.Google Scholar
Kothari, U. 2002. ‘Feminist and Postcolonial Challenges to Development’, in Minogue, M and Kothari, U (eds.). Development Theory and Practice: Critical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, R. 2002. ‘The Self in Participatory Poverty Research’, in Brock, K and McGee, R (eds.). Knowing Poverty: Critical Reflections on Participatory Research and Policy. London: Earthscan: 14–43.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Z. 2014. The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Penz, P., Drydyk, J. and Bose, P. 2011. Displacement by Development: Ethics, Rights and Responsibilities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 1997. ‘A Weakness of the Capability Approach with Respect to Gender Justice’. Journal of International Development 9/2: 251–262.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.). 2001. Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reason, P. and Bradbury, H.(eds.) 2008. Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sen, A 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Somekh, B. 2006. Action Research: A Methodology for Change and Development. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Vandekinderen, C., Roets, G., Van Keer, H. and Roose, R. 2017. ‘Participation and Participatory Research from a Capability Perspective’, in Otto, H.-U., Egdell, V., Bonvin, J.-M. and Atzmüller, R. (eds.). Empowering Young People in Disempowering Times: Fighting Inequality through Capability-Oriented Policy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar: 274–293.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×