Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Chapter 26 Using Ethnography in Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Chapter 27 Action Research as an Impactful Approach to Study Strategy with Practice
- Chapter 28 Studying Strategizing through Biographical Interviews or Narratives of Practices
- Chapter 29 Using Photographic Methods in Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Chapter 30 A Critical Discursive Approach to Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Chapter 31 Studying Strategy as Practice through Historical Methods
- Chapter 32 Quantitative Methods in Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Chapter 29 - Using Photographic Methods in Strategy-as-Practice Research
from Part IV - Methodological Resources
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2025
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Chapter 26 Using Ethnography in Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Chapter 27 Action Research as an Impactful Approach to Study Strategy with Practice
- Chapter 28 Studying Strategizing through Biographical Interviews or Narratives of Practices
- Chapter 29 Using Photographic Methods in Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Chapter 30 A Critical Discursive Approach to Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Chapter 31 Studying Strategy as Practice through Historical Methods
- Chapter 32 Quantitative Methods in Strategy-as-Practice Research
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Summary
Anne Smith, Ace Beorchia, and Jaewoo Jung respond to calls for more innovative methods in SAP research by elaborating on the foundations of photographic methods and exploring their relevance for the study of strategizing activities and practices. The authors begin by discussing the increasing interest in visuals in management and organizational research and explain why photographic methods provide unique benefits for advancing strategy as practice research. They then review the use of photography in SAP research – identifying and discussing six SAP research projects in which photographs played a prominent role. Next, they develop and explain a framework to categorize the use of photography in strategy as practice research. Considering two dimensions – the photographs’ creators and the photographs’ role in research – this framework identifies four ways photographs can be used in a research project: outside-in supportive approach, outside-in integrated approach, inside-out supportive approach, and inside-in integrative approach. Based on this framework, the authors highlight the main considerations when undertaking systematic analysis of photographic data. To illustrate how SAP research can benefit from using photographs, they provide an example from longitudinal research studying how daily activities and changes to space are connected to strategic changes and provide a structured analysis of one photo image set extracted from this research project. They conclude by discussing different options in pursuing photographic methods in SAP research.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 526 - 540Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abdallah, C., Basque, J. and Rouleau, L. (2017), ‘Designing strategy as practice research’, in Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., and Grandy, G. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: 328–44. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1981), Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, 1st American edn. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bell, E. and Davison, J. (2013), ‘Visual management studies: empirical and theoretical approaches’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 15/2: 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. and Vachhani, S. J. (2020), ‘Relational encounters and vital materiality in the practice of craft work’, Organization Studies, 41/5: 681–701. *CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, A., Isermann, H. and Knieper, T. (2011), ‘Quantitative content analysis of the visual’, in Margolis, E., and Pauwels, L. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: 265–82. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. and Svejenova, S. (2015), ‘The material and visual turn in organization theory: objectifying and (re)acting to novel ideas’, Organization Studies, 36: 133–8.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D. A. (1997), ‘The limits and opportunities of business process reengineering in a politicized organizational environment’, Human Relations, 50/1: 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, D. A. (2001), ‘The role of photography in organizational research’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 10/2: 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, C., Radcliffe, L. and Malik, F. (2020), ‘Participant reflexivity in organizational research design’, Organizational Research Methods, 23/4: 750–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, J. and Collier, M. (1986), Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Collier, M. (2001), ‘Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology’, in van Leeuwen, T., and Jewitt, C. (eds), Handbook of Visual Analysis: 35–60. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Comi, A. and Whyte, J. (2018), ‘Future making and visual artefacts: an ethnographic study of a design project’, Organization Studies: 39/8: 1055–83. *CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, J. (2010), ‘[In] visible [in] tangibles: visual portraits of the business élite’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35/2: 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, J., McLean, C. and Warren, S. (2012), ‘Exploring the visual in organizations and management’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 7/1: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, S. and Guillemin, M. (2014), ‘From photographs to findings: visual meaning-making and interpretive engagement in the analysis of participant-generated images’, Visual Studies: 29/1: 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstead, A., Jewson, N. and Walters, S. (2004), ‘Images, interviews and interpretations: making connections in visual research’, in Pole, C. (ed.), Seeing Is Believing? Approaches to Visual Research: 105–22. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Flum, M. R., Siqueira, C. E., DeCaro, A. and Redway, S. (2010), ‘Photovoice in the workplace: a participatory method to give voice to workers to identify health and safety hazards and promote workplace change’, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 53/11: 1150–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (eds) (2015), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2nd edn. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, H., Elias, S. R., Stevenson, A., Smith, A., Alexander, B. and Barros, M., (2022), ‘Keeping qualitative research weird: prevalent silences in interview-based research and practices to unsilence non-interview data, researchers, and context’, Presentation at annual meeting of Academy of Management, Seattle, WA, Research Methods Division.Google Scholar
Hassard, J., Burns, D., Hyde, P. and Burns, J. P. (2018), ‘A visual turn for organizational ethnography: embodying the subject in video-based research’, Organization Studies, 39/10: 1403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höllerer, M., van Leeuwen, T., Jancsary, D., Meyer, R., Anderson, T. H. and Vaara, E. (2019). Visual and Multimodal Research in Organization and Management Studies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, P., Wright, A. L. and Middleton, S. (2022), ‘How material objects shape student team learning processes’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 21/1: 35–60. *CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, M. J. (2022), We get them running through walls: crafting emotion work through Strategizing. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Warwick. *Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Constructing spaces for strategic work: a multimodal perspective’, British Journal of Management, 26: S26–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, A. P. and Smets, M. (2013), ‘Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with “stuff”’, European Management Journal, 31/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellstrand, I. and Vince, R (2020), ‘A trip down memory lane: how photograph insertion methods trigger emotional memory and enhance recall during interviews’, in Crook, T. R., Lê, J., and Smith, A. D. (eds), Advancing Methodological Thought and Practice, vol. 12: 39–53. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A., Bell, E., Bliese, P., LeBaron, C. and Gruber, M. (2023), ‘From the editors: opening up AMJ’s research methods repertoire’, Academy of Management Journal, 66/3: 711–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Pratt, M. G. and Fetzer, G. (2018), ‘An introduction to video methods in organizational research’, Organizational Research Methods, 21/2: 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F., Jarrett, M. and Rouleau, L. (2021). ‘Doing video-ethnography research in top management teams’, in Grosjean, S., and Matte, F. (eds), Organizational Video-Ethnography Revisited: Making Visible Material, Embodied and Sensory Practices: 133–54. Gewerbestrasse: Switzer Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Maier, J. (2005), ‘Photo essay: after life–survival of a Ph.D’, Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 4/4: 88–116.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. and Rowe, J. (2011), ‘Methodological approaches to disclosing historical photographs’, in Margolis, E., and Powels, L. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods: 337–58. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D. and van Leeuwen, T. (2013), ‘The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues’, Academy of Management Annals, 7/1: 489–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyler, D., Stimpson, J. P. and Cutchin, M. P. (2007), ‘Landscapes of risk: Texas City and the petrochemical industry’, Organization and Environment, 20/2: 204–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, C. (2022), ‘The stuff of strategy: the potential of the material turn in strategy studies’, Doctoral Dissertation. University of Glasgow. *Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2001), Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G., Sonenshein, S. and Feldman, M. S. (2022), ‘Moving beyond templates: a bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research’, Organizational Research Methods, 25/2: 211–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, J. and Schwartz, D. (1998), ‘Photographs within the sociological research process’, in Prosser, J. (ed.), Image-Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Research: 115–30. Bristol, PA: Falmer.Google Scholar
Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/7: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, J. L. and Smith, A. D. (2012), ‘Using photographs to research organizations: evidence, considerations, and application in a field study’, Organizational Research Methods, 15/2: 288–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2015), ‘Studying strategizing through biographical methods: narratives of practices and life trajectories of practitioners’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 462–76. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SAP Interest Group (2013). Three Year Review Report Submitted to the Academy of Management DIGR Committee, https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AOM/b8658241-5115-4e29-8704-eb913192a55e/UploadedImages/SAP/Documents/SAPReviewReport_2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shortt, H. (2012), ‘Identityscapes of a hair salon: work identities and the value of visual methods’, Sociological Research Online, 17/2: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shortt, H. L. and Warren, S. K. (2019), ‘Grounded visual pattern analysis: photographs in organizational field studies’, Organizational Research Methods, 22/2: 539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slutskaya, N., Game, A. M. and Simpson, R. C. (2018), ‘Better together: examining the role of collaborative ethnographic documentary in organizational research’, Organizational Research Methods, 21/2: 341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slutskaya, N., Simpson, A. and Hughes, J. (2012), ‘Lessons from photoelicitation: encouraging working men to speak’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 7/1: 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Ende, L. and van Marrewijk, A. (2018), ‘The point of no return: ritual performance and strategy making in project organizations’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 451–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vince, R. and Warren, S. (2012), ‘Participatory visual methods’, in Cassell, C., and Symon, G. (eds), The Practice of Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges: 275–96. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wang, C. and Burris, M. A. (1997), ‘Photo-voice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment’, Health Education and Behavior, 24/3: 369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S. (2002), ‘‘Show me how it feels to work here’: using photography to research organizational aesthetics’, Theory and Politics in Organizations, 2: 224–45.Google Scholar
Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26: S67–S89. *CrossRefGoogle Scholar