Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Chapter 17 An Institutional Perspective on Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 18 Identity Work as a Strategic Practice
- Chapter 19 Sensemaking in Strategy as Practice: From a Phenomenon towards a Theory?
- Chapter 20 Routine Dynamics and Connections to Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 21 The Communicative Constitution of Strategy-Making: Exploring Fleeting Moments of Strategy
- Chapter 22 A Social-Symbolic Work Perspective on Strategy as Practice: The Objects of Strategy Work
- Chapter 23 Relating Strategy as Practice to the Resource-Based View, Capabilities Perspectives and Micro-Foundations Approaches
- Chapter 24 Analytical Frames for Studying Power in Strategy as Practice and Beyond
- Chapter 25 Strategy as Practice and the Critical Eye
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Chapter 22 - A Social-Symbolic Work Perspective on Strategy as Practice: The Objects of Strategy Work
from Part III - Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2025
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Chapter 17 An Institutional Perspective on Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 18 Identity Work as a Strategic Practice
- Chapter 19 Sensemaking in Strategy as Practice: From a Phenomenon towards a Theory?
- Chapter 20 Routine Dynamics and Connections to Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 21 The Communicative Constitution of Strategy-Making: Exploring Fleeting Moments of Strategy
- Chapter 22 A Social-Symbolic Work Perspective on Strategy as Practice: The Objects of Strategy Work
- Chapter 23 Relating Strategy as Practice to the Resource-Based View, Capabilities Perspectives and Micro-Foundations Approaches
- Chapter 24 Analytical Frames for Studying Power in Strategy as Practice and Beyond
- Chapter 25 Strategy as Practice and the Critical Eye
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Summary
Tyson Rallens, Tom Lawrence and Nelson Phillips adopt a social-symbolic perspective on strategy work. Thereby, they offer a sorely needed analysis of what strategy work consists of. More specifically, the authors use the social-symbolic approach to illuminate the ‘objects’ that strategy practitioners work on. They identify three types of objects: strategy objects, strategic objects and strategists (as objects). They also explain how this work amounts to programmes of action and how objects of strategy work are embedded in ecologies of social-symbolic objects. They conclude by discussing how this approach can benefit future strategy as practice research and how such work can add to research on social-symbolic work more generally.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 401 - 416Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Adner, R. and Kapoor, R. (2010), ‘Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations’, Strategic Management Journal, 31/3: 306–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Blom, M. (2022), ‘The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organization studies’, Human Relations, 75/1: 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, M. B. and Rousseau, D. M. (eds) (2001), The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Awad, M. H. (2023), ‘Emplacing category dynamics: houselessness and the emergence of transitional micro-housing villages’, Strategic Organization, 21/1: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberá-Tomás, D., Castelló, I., de Bakker, F. G. A. and Zietsma, C. (2019), ‘Energizing through visuals: how social entrepreneurs use emotion-symbolic work for social change’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/6: 1789–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1986), ‘Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy’, Management Science, 32/10: 1231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J. and d’Aunno, T. A. (2009), ‘Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency’, in Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 31–58. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinhocker, E. D. and Kaplan, S. (2002), ‘Tired of strategic planning?’, McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 48–57.Google Scholar
Beyes, T. and Holt, R. (2020), ‘The topographical imagination: space and organization theory’, Organization Theory, 1/2, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T. (2012), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Anniversary edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2015), ‘Identities and identity work in organizations’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 17/1: 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2017), ‘Identity work and organizational identification’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 19/3: 296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. (2022), ‘Identities in and around organizations: towards an identity work perspective’, Human Relations, 75/7: 1205–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. and Law, J. (1997), ‘After the individual in society: lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society’, The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 22/2: 165–82.Google Scholar
Carlile, P. R. (2002), ‘A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development’, Organization Science, 13/4: 442–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlile, P. R. (2004), ‘Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries’, Organization Science, 15/5: 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, G. (2020), ‘How assemblages change when theories become performative: the case of the Blue Ocean Strategy’, Organization Studies, 41/10: 1417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chudzikowski, K. and Mayrhofer, W. (2011), ‘In search of the blue flower? Grand social theories and career research: the case of Bourdieu’s theory of practice’, Human Relations, 64/1: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, L. and Tracey, P. (2020), ‘Making change from behind a mask: how organizations challenge guarded institutions by sparking grassroots activism’, Academy of Management Journal, 63/4: 965–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, M. (2011), The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall, S., 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denrell, J., Fang, C. and Winter, S. G. (2003), ‘The economics of strategic opportunity’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/10: 977–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M. and Bednar, J. (2010), ‘Pathways for positive identity construction at work: four types of positive identity and the building of social resources’, Academy of Management Review, 35/2: 265–93.Google Scholar
Etter, M., Ravasi, D. and Colleoni, E. (2019), ‘Social media and the formation of organizational reputation’, Academy of Management Review, 44/1: 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2004), ‘Resources in emerging structures and processes of change’, Organization Science, 15/3: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. and Worline, M. (2016), ‘The practicality of practice theory’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15/2: 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehman, J., Treviño, L. K. and Garud, R. (2013), ‘Values work: a process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices’, Academy of Management Journal, 56/1: 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L. and Krikorian, F. (2018), ‘How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility’, Strategic Organization, 16/3: 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Arcos, C., Joubert, A. M., Scaraboto, D., Guesalaga, R. and Sandberg, J. (2021), ‘“How do I carry all this now?” Understanding consumer resistance to sustainability interventions’, Journal of Marketing, 85/3: 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A. (2003), ‘When “the show must go on”: surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery’, Academy of Management Journal, 46/1: 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2013), ‘Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: the role of emotion regulation in employee voice’, Academy of Management Journal, 56/6: 1703–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001), ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment’, Psychological Review, 108/4: 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2007), ‘The new synthesis in moral psychology’, Science, 316/5827: 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, G. (2010), ‘Technology, objects and things in Heidegger’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34/1: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1979), ‘Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure’, American Journal of Sociology, 85/3: 551–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstein, J. and Rantakari, A. (2023), ‘Space and the dynamic between openness and closure: open strategizing in the TV series Borgen’, Organization Studies, 44/1: 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, H. (2004), Working Identity: Unconventional Strategies for Reinventing Your Career. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2008), ‘Shaping strategy as a structuration process’, Academy of Management Journal, 51/4: 621–50.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Constructing spaces for strategic work: a multimodal perspective’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S26–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3, https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211029665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannan-Narasimhan, R. and Lawrence, B. S. (2018), ‘How innovators reframe resources in the strategy-making process to gain innovation adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 720–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karadag, R. and Poppo, L. (2023), ‘Strategic resource decay’, Strategic Management Journal, 44/6: 1534–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. C. (2005), Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. and Phillips, N. (2019), Constructing Organizational Life: How Social-Symbolic Work Shapes Selves, Organizations, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. and Suddaby, R. (2006), ‘Institutions and institutional work’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Nord, W. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies: 215–54. 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2011), ‘Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20/1: 52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Schlindwein, E., Jalan, R. and Heaphy, E. D. (2023), ‘Organizational body work: efforts to shape human bodies in organizations’, Academy of Management Annals, 17/1: 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R. and Tagney, J. P. (2003), ‘The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences’, in Leary, M. R., and Tagney, J. P. (eds), Handbook of Self and Identity: 1–18. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Liu, F. and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livne-Tarandach, R. and Jazaieri, H. (2021), ‘Swift sense of community: resourcing artifacts for rapid community emergence in a temporary organization’, Academy of Management Journal, 64/41127–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Whittington, R. (2021), ‘Becoming a strategist: the roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work’, Strategic Organization, 19/4: 553–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and van der Heyden, L. (1999), ‘Organigraphs: drawing how companies really work’, Harvard Business Review, 77/5: 87–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pandza, K., Whittington, R. and Hautz, J. (2022), ‘In praise of fractionated trading zones: respectful partnerships in management innovation’, Strategic Management Review, 3/1: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T. B. (2012), ‘The turn to work in organization and management theory: some implications for strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 10/3: 223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. and Hardy, C. (2004), ‘Discourse and institutions’, Academy of Management Review, 29/4: 635–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68/3: 79–91.Google Scholar
Ravasi, D., Rindova, V., Etter, M. and Cornelissen, J. (2018), The formation of organizational reputation’, Academy of Management Annals, 12/2: 574–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Cloutier, C. (2022), ‘It’s strategy. But is it practice? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research. Strategic Organization, 20/4: 722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, I., Kotlar, J., Ravasi, D. and Vaara, E. (2020), ‘Dealing with revered past: historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 41/3: 590–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and Savigny, E. von. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shepherd, D. A., Seyb, S. and George, G. (2023), ‘Grounding business models: cognition, boundary objects, and business-model change’, Academy of Management Review, 48/1: 100–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. A. and Anderson, L. (1987), ‘Identity work among the homeless: the verbal construction and avowal of personal identities’, American Journal of Sociology, 92/6: 1336–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2014), ‘How organizations foster the creative use of resources’, Academy of Management Journal, 57/3: 814–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, E. Y. (2021), ‘Protect to damage? Institutional work, unintended consequences and institutional dynamics’, Organization Studies, 42/3: 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009), ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’, Strategic Organization, 7/2: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989), ‘Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science, 19/3: 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, R. I. and Rafaeli, A. (1988), ‘Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: the case of convenience stores’, Academy of Management Journal, 31/3: 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, S. and Arthur, M. B. (2010), ‘New directions for boundaryless careers: agency and interdependence in a changing world’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31/5: 629–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, P. and Phillips, N. (2016), ‘Managing the consequences of organizational stigmatization: identity work in a social enterprise’, Academy of Management Journal, 59/3: 740–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26: S67–S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ‘A resource‐based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5/2: 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2003), ‘The work of strategizing and organizing: for a practice perspective’, Strategic Organization, 1/1: 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2019), Opening Strategy: Professional Strategists and Practice Change, 1960 to Today, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J., and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M. and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategising/organising: broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, I. (2018), ‘Identity work and emotions: a review’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 20/1: 120–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zietsma, C. and Lawrence, T. B. (2010), ‘Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55/2: 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuzul, T. W. (2019), ‘“Matter battles”: cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/3: 739–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar