Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:25:54.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Pierre Bourdieu: An Intellectual Legacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

By
David L. Swartz
Edited by
Peter Kivisto
Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

Globally the most cited sociologist today, Pierre Bourdieu laid the foundations for an enduring intellectual legacy. This chapter explores Bourdieu’s legacy in terms of his career, his innovative and distinctive conceptual framework, his broad multidisciplinary appeal, his enduring contributions, and frequently voiced criticisms.

David L. Swartz is author of the American Sociological Association History of Sociology Section 2014 award-winning book: Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (University of Chicago Press). He is a researcher in the Department of Sociology at Boston University and Senior Editor and Book Review Editor for Theory and Society. His research interests include social theory, education, culture, stratification, and political sociology. He is currently studying divisions between American academic conservatives who support the Trump presidency and those who do not.

Keywords

Bourdieu’s conceptual contributionsBourdieu’s legacyBourdieu’s theorycriticisms of BourdieuUS reception of Bourdieu
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 317 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1961 [1958]. The Algerians. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984 [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988 [1984]. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990 [1980]. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “The Scholastic Point of View.” Cultural Anthropology 5(4): 380–391.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996 [1992]. The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996 [1989]. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Acts of Resistance. Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998 [1996]. On Television. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999a. “The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas.” In Shusterman, Richard (ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader (pp. 220–228). Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (ed.) 1999b [1993]. The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2000 [1997] Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2001 . Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2004 [2001]. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2005 [2000]. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2014 [2012]. On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989–1992. Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2017 [2013]. Manet: A Symbolic Revolution. Cambridge, UK and Medford, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1970. Reproduction: In Education, Society, and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron, Jean-Claude 1979 [1964]. The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relation to Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1985. “Rethinking Classical Sociology: The Sociological Vision of Pierre Bourdieu.” Theory and Society 14 (6):745–775.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1993. “Social Theory as Habitus.” In Calhoun, Craig, LiPuma, Edward, and Postone, Moishe (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (pp. 212–234). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70(February): 4–28.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, and Karl, Von Holdt. 2012. Conversations with Bourdieu: The Johannesburg Moment. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1993. “Habitus, Field, and Capital: The Question of Historical Specificity.” In Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (pp. 61–88). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 2006. “Pierre Bourdieu and Social Transformations: Lesson from Algeria.” Development and Change 37(6): 1403–1415.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 2008. “Pierre Bourdieu.” In Ritzer, George (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Major Contemporary Social Theorists (pp. 274–309). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 2013. “For the Social History of the Present: Bourdieu as Historical Sociologist.” In Gorski, Phillip S. (ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 36–66). Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles. 2013 “Bourdieu’s Two Sociologies of Knowledge.” In Gorski, Phillip S. (ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 183–211). Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Caren, Neal. 2012. “The 102 Most Cited Works in Sociology, 2008–2012.” Neal Caren. Previously available on Neal Caren’s website at https://nealcaren.org/Google Scholar
Carter, Prudence L. 2005. Keepin’ It Real: School Success Beyond Black and White. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2011. “Bourdieu Hits Brussels: The Genesis and Structure of the European Field of Power.” International Political Sociology 5(3): 335–339.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2018. “Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations.” In Medvetz, Thomas and Sallaz, Jeffrey J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 200–246). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2008. Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2014. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conley, Dalton. 2015. You May Ask Yourself, 4th ed. New York and London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Davies, Scott, and Rizk, Jessica. 2018. “The Three Generations of Cultural Capital Research: A Narrative Review.” Review of Educational Research 88(3): 331–365.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul. 1979. “Review Essay on Pierre Bourdieu.” American Journal of Sociology 84(6): 1460–1474.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Mohr, John. 1985. “Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection.” American Journal of Sociology 90(6): 1231–1261.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.Google Scholar
Dumais, Susan A. 2015. “Cultural Capital and Education.” International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavior Sciences 5: 375–381. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10433-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Johnson, Victoria. 2008. “Bourdieu and Organizational Analysis.” Theory and Society 37(1): 1–44.Google Scholar
Eyal, Gil. 2013 “Spaces Between Fields.” In Gorski, Phillip S. (ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 158–182). Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ferris, Kerry, and Stein, Jill. 2016 The Real World: An Introduction to Sociology, 5th ed. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and Doug, McAdam. 2012 A Theory of Fields. Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum, and Deborah Carr. 2016 Introduction to Sociology, 10th ed. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Go, Julian, and Krause, Monika. 2016. Fielding Transnationalism: An Introduction. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Chad Alan. 2003. “Haunted by the Specter of Communism: Collective Identity and Resource Mobilization in the Demise of the Workers Alliance of America.” Theory and Society 32(5–6): 725–773.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H. 2007. “‘Cultural Capital’: Some Critical Observations.” Sociologica (2). DOI:10.2383/24755Google Scholar
Gorski, Phillip S. 2013a. “Bourdieu as a Theorist of Change.” In Gorski, Phillip S. (ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 1–15). Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, Phillip S. 2013b. “Nation-ization Struggles: A Bourdieusian Theory of Nationalism.” In Gorski, Phillip S. (ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 242–265). Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Elliott. 2016. “What Are the Most-Cited Publications in the Social Sciences (according to Google Scholar)?” LSE blog. The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard. 2000. Pierre Bourdieu. Revised ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karabel, Jerome, and Halsey, A. H. (eds.). 1977. Power and Ideology in Education. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo. 2003. “Bourdieu’s Political Sociology and the Politics of European Integration.” Theory and Society 32(5–6): 775–789.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo. 2018. “Transnational Social Fields.” In Medvetz, Thomas and Sallaz, Jeffrey J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 183–199). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo, and Swartz, David. 2015. “Global Bourdieu.” Comparative Sociology 14: 565–586. DOI:10.1163/15691330-12341358Google Scholar
Kingston, Paul W. 2001. “The Unfulfilled Promise of Cultural Capital Theory.” Sociology of Education. Extra Issue: 88–99.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. 2010. The Plural Actor. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Morals, & Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 2010. “Looking Back at Bourdieu.” In Silva, Elizabeth and Warde, Alan (eds.), Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives (pp. 128–141). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Lareau, Annette. 1988. “Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments.” Sociological Theory 6(2): 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lareau, Annette. 2011. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. 2. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lareau, Annette, and Weininger, Elliot. 2003. “Cultural Capital in Educational Research: A Critical Assessment.” Theory and Society 32: 567–606.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2006. “Transnational Fields: Elements of a Reflexive Sociology of the Internationalisation of Law.” Retfoerd 3(114): 23–41.Google Scholar
Medvetz, Thomas, and Sallaz, Jeffrey J. (eds.). 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J., and Orloff, Ann Shola (eds.). 2017. The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ollion, Etienne. 2012. “Pierre Bourdieu.” Oxford Bibliographies. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0083.xml DOI:10.1093/OBO/9780199756384.0083Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard A., and Kern, Roger M.. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review 61(5): 900–907.Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard A., and Simkus, Albert. 1992. “How Musical Taste Groups Mark Occupational Status Groups.” In Lamont, Michèle and Fournier, Marcel (eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 158–162). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sallaz, Jeffrey J., and Zavisca, Jane. 2007. “Bourdieu in American Sociology, 1980–2004.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 21–41.Google Scholar
Santoro, Marco. 2008. “Putting Bourdieu in the Global Field. Introduction to the Symposium.” Sociologica 2 (September–October): 1–32. DOI:10.2383/27719Google Scholar
Santoro, Marco. 2009a. “Introduction to the Second Part.” Sociologica 1(January–April): 1–4. DOI:10.2383/29617Google Scholar
Santoro, Marco. 2009b. “Introduction to the Third Part.” Sociologica 2–3(May–December): 1–4. DOI:10.2383/31369Google Scholar
Santoro, Marco. 2011. “From Bourdieu to Cultural Sociology.” Cultural Sociology 5(1): 3–23. DOI:10.1177/1749975510397861Google Scholar
Sapiro, Gisèle. 2018. “Field Theory from a Transnational Perspective.” In Medvetz, Thomas and Sallaz, Jeffrey J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 161–182). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Gisèle, and Bustamante, Mauricio. 2009. “Translation as a Measure of International Consecration. Mapping the World Distribution of Bourdieu’s Books in Translation.” Sociologica 2–3(May–December): 1–45. DOI:10.2383/31374Google Scholar
Sewell, William H., Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Silva, Elizabeth, and Warde, Alan (eds.). 2010. Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives. London and New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 2011. “Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology.” Cultural Sociology 5(1): 45–66.Google Scholar
Susen, Simon, and Turner, Bryan S.. 2011. The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, David L. 1977. “Pierre Bourdieu: The Cultural Transmission of Social Inequality.” Harvard Educational Review 47(November): 545–554.Google Scholar
Swartz, David. 1997. Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, David. 2005. “Central Concepts of Bourdieusian Analysis.” In Conference on “Bourdieuian Theory and Historical Analysis.” April 28–May 1, 2005, Yale University.Google Scholar
Swartz, David. 2006. “Pierre Bourdieu and North American Political Sociology: Why He Doesn’t Fit In But Should.” French Politics 4: 84–89.Google Scholar
Swartz, David L. 2013a. “Metaprinciples for Sociological Research in a Bourdieusian Perspective.” In Gorski, Phillip S. (ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 19–35). Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, David L. 2013b. Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, David L. 2016. “Bourdieu’s Concept of Field.” Oxford Bibliographies. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0164.xmlGoogle Scholar
Swartz, David L. 2018. “Cultural Capital.” Oxford Bibliographies. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0209.xmlGoogle Scholar
Swartz, David L., and Zolberg, Vera L. (eds.). 2004. After Bourdieu. Influence, Critique, Elaboration. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 2002. “In Memoriam: Pierre Bourdieu.” Account: A Newsletter of Economic Sociology 2(2): 1–2.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine. 2008. “The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (For a Renewed Research Agenda).” International Political Sociology 2(2): 128–144.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine. 2011. “Interstitial Power in Fields of Limited Statehood: Introducing a ‘Weak Field’ Approach to the Study of Transnational Settings.” International Political Sociology 5(3): 340–345.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 2008. “Bourdieu and Organizations: The Empirical Challenge.” Theory and Society 37(1): 65–81.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2003. Body and Soul: Notes of an Apprentice Boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1989. “Towards a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu.” Sociological Theory 7(1): 26–63.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1992. “Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu’s Sociology.” In Pierre, Bourdieu and Loïc J. D. Wacquant (eds.), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (pp. 2–59). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weininger, Elliot, and Lareau, Annette. 2018. “Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology of Education.” In Medvetz, Thomas and Sallaz, Jeffrey J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 253–272). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Kerry. 2013 Pimping the Welfare System: Empowering Participants with Economic, Social, and Cultural Capital. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Woodward, Kerry. 2018. “The Relevance of Bourdieu’s Concepts for Studying the Intersections of Poverty, Race, and Culture.” In Thomas Medvetz and Jeffrey J. Sallaz (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 629–644) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yosso, Tara J. 2005. “Whose Culture Has Capital? A Critical Race Theory Discussion of Community Cultural Wealth.” Race Ethnicity and Education 8(1): 69–91. DOI:10.1080/1361332052000341006Google Scholar
Zavisca, Jane, and Sallaz, Jeffrey J.. 2008. “From the Margins to the Mainstream: The Curious Convergence of Pierre Bourdieu and US Sociology.” Sociologica 2: 1–20. DOI:10.2383/27721Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×