Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Social Theory
- 2 “What Is a Classic?”
- 3 Karl Marx
- 4 The Marxist Legacy
- 5 Émile Durkheim: Theorist of Solidarity
- 6 What’s in a Name?
- 7 Max Weber
- 8 Weberian Social Theory
- 9 Georg Simmel and the Metropolitization of Social Life
- 10 Pounding on Parsons: How Criticism Undermined the Reputation of Sociology’s Incurable Theorist
- 11 Symbolic Interactionism
- 12 Erving Goffman and Dramaturgical Sociology
- 13 Structuralism
- 14 Norbert Elias, Civilising Processes, and Figurational (or Process) Sociology
- 15 Phenomenology and Social Theory
- 16 Pierre Bourdieu: An Intellectual Legacy
- 17 Developing Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel on the Constitutive Interactional Practices in Social Systems of Interaction
- 18 Jürgen Habermas
- 19 Anthony Giddens, Structuration Theory, and Radical Politics
- Index
- References
18 - Jürgen Habermas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2020
By
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Social Theory
- 2 “What Is a Classic?”
- 3 Karl Marx
- 4 The Marxist Legacy
- 5 Émile Durkheim: Theorist of Solidarity
- 6 What’s in a Name?
- 7 Max Weber
- 8 Weberian Social Theory
- 9 Georg Simmel and the Metropolitization of Social Life
- 10 Pounding on Parsons: How Criticism Undermined the Reputation of Sociology’s Incurable Theorist
- 11 Symbolic Interactionism
- 12 Erving Goffman and Dramaturgical Sociology
- 13 Structuralism
- 14 Norbert Elias, Civilising Processes, and Figurational (or Process) Sociology
- 15 Phenomenology and Social Theory
- 16 Pierre Bourdieu: An Intellectual Legacy
- 17 Developing Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel on the Constitutive Interactional Practices in Social Systems of Interaction
- 18 Jürgen Habermas
- 19 Anthony Giddens, Structuration Theory, and Radical Politics
- Index
- References
Summary
The main purpose of this chapter is to provide a summary of the main intellectual contributions that the German sociologist and philosopher Jürgen Habermas has made to contemporary social theory. To this end, the chapter provides an overview of his life and career; principal areas of research; conception of critical theory; interpretation of relevant intellectual traditions; and his plea for a paradigm shift, commonly known as the “linguistic turn.” The final section grapples with the main limitations and shortcomings of Habermas’s oeuvre, notably with regard to his theory of communicative action.
Simon Susen is Professor of Sociology at City, University of London. He is an Associate Member of the Bauman Institute and, together with Bryan S. Turner, editor of the Journal of Classical Sociology.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 369 - 394Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1991. “Habermas and Critical Theory: Beyond the Marxian Dilemma?” In Axel, Honneth and Hans, Joas (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action (pp. 44–73). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1992. “Normatively Grounding ‘Critical Theory’ through Recourse to the Lifeworld? A Transcendental Attempt to Think with Habermas against Habermas.” In Honneth, Alex, McCarthy, Thomas, Offe, Claus, and Wellmer, Albrecht (eds.), Philosophic Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment (pp. 125–170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bubner, Rüdiger. 1988. Essays in Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. Trans. Matthews, Eric. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Callinicos, Alex. 1989. Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 1994. Language and Reason: A Study of Habermas’s Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Finke, Stale. 2001. “Concepts and Intuitions: Adorno after the Linguistic Turn.” Inquiry 44(2): 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Trans. Hess, G. B. and Palmer, R. E.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas & the Frankfurt School. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1977. Studies in Social and Political Philosophy. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1954. Das Absolute und die Geschichte: Von der Zwiespältigkeit in Schellings Denken. Bonn: H. Bouvier.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Trans. Shapiro, Jeremy J.. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1972. “Einige Bemerkungen zum Problem der Bergündung von Werturteilen.” In Philosophie und Wissenschaft: 9. Deutscher Kongreß für Philosophie. Düsseldorf: Hain.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1982. “A Reply to My Critics.” In Thompson, John B. and Held, David (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (pp. 219–283). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. “Remarks on the Concept of Communicative Action.” In Seebaß, Gottfried and Tuomela, Raimo (eds.), Social Action (pp. 151–178). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987a. The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 volumes. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987b. Knowledge and Human Interests. Trans. Shapiro, Jeremy J.. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987c. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988a. Theory and Practice. Trans. Viertel, John. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988b. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Trans. Weber Nicholsen, Shierry and Stark, Jerry A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989a. The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate. Trans. Weber Nicholsen, Shierry. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989b [1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. “A Reply.” In Honneth, Alex and Hans, Joas (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action (pp. 214–264). Cambridge, UK Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Trans. Hohengarten, William Mark. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996a. “Modernity: An Unfinished Project.” In d’Entrèves, Maruizio Passerin and Benhabib, Seyla (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity (pp. 38–55). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996b. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory. Trans. Fehg, William. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2000. “From Kant to Hegel: On Robert Brandom’s Pragmatic Philosophy of Language.” European Journal of Philosophy 8(3): 322–355.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001b. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. Fultner, Barbara. Cambridge; UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: From Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1991. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kögler, Hans-Herbert. 1996. The Power of Dialogue: Critical Hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 1999. The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 2000. Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Ed. David, McLellan. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Outhwaite, William. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pleasants, Nigel. 1999. Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas, and Bhaskar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ray, Larry. 1993. Rethinking Critical Theory: Emancipation in the Age of Global Social Movements. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Roderick, Rick. 1986. Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2006. Kritik der Kommunikativen Rationalität. Marsberg: Die Deutsche Bibliothek.Google Scholar
Susen, Simon. 2007. The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Theory. Oxford, UK: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Susen, Simon. 2010. “Remarks on the Concept of Critique in Habermasian Thought.” Journal of Global Ethics 6(2): 103–126.Google Scholar
Susen, Simon. 2015. The “Postmodern Turn” in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1981. Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1982. “Universal Pragmatics.” In Thompson, John B. and Held, David (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (pp. 116–133). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar