Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T06:14:04.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Field Experiments and Routine Dynamics

from Part II - Methodological Issues in Routine Dynamics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2021

By
Hari Bapuji ,
Manpreet Hora  and
Huashan Li
Edited by
Martha S. Feldman ,
Brian T. Pentland ,
Luciana D'Adderio ,
Katharina Dittrich ,
Claus Rerup  and
David Seidl
Martha S. Feldman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Brian T. Pentland
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Luciana D'Adderio
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Katharina Dittrich
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus Rerup
Affiliation:
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Get access

Summary

Experimental approaches are gaining in popularity across disciplines, ranging from behavioural sciences to economics. In this chapter, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of field experiments and review their use by scholars to study routine dynamics. Based on these, we suggest that field experiments hold further promise to study routines given their potential to develop and test theory, while achieving internal and external validity. To further the adoption of field experiments to study routines, we outline a five-step procedure, including research questions and hypotheses, context and research setting, treatment and design, measurement and statistical tests, and managing field experiments. We conclude by discussing potential research questions and contexts suitable for field experiments.

Keywords

Routinesroutine dynamicsfield experimentsendogeneityexperimental designinternal validityexternal validitytreatment groupcontrol group
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics , pp. 147 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bapuji, H., Hora, M. and Saeed, A. M. (2012). Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: Examining the emergence of routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1586–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bapuji, H., Hora, M., Saeed, A. and Turner, S. (2019). How understanding-based redesign influences the pattern of actions and effectiveness of routines. Journal of Management, 45(5), 2132–2162.Google Scholar
Buell, R. W., Kim, T. and Tsay, C.-J. (2017). Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Science, 63(6), 1673–1695.Google Scholar
Chatterji, A. K., Findley, M., Jensen, N. M., Meier, S. and Nielson, D. (2016). Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 116–132.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A. (2008). From the editors publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 616–620.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, G., King, A. A. and Verona, G. (2014). Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1645–1670.Google Scholar
Eden, D. (2017). Field experiments in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 91–122.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. and Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.Google Scholar
Gossling, S., Arana, J. E. and Aguiar-Quintana, J. T. (2019). Towel reuse in hotels: Importance of normative appeal designs. Tourism Management, 70, 273–283.Google Scholar
Hauser, O. P., Linos, E. and Rogers, T. (2017). Innovation with field experiments: Studying organizational behaviors in actual organizations. In Staw, B. M. and Brief, A. P., eds., Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 37. Bingley: JAI Press, pp. 185–198.Google Scholar
Holman, D. J., Axtell, C. M., Sprigg, C. A., Totterdell, P. and Wall, T. D. (2010). The mediating role of job characteristics in job redesign interventions: A serendipitous quasi-experiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 84–105.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Smith, V. (2002). Foundations of behavioral and experimental economics. Nobel Prize in Economics Documents, 1(7).Google Scholar
Ketokivi, M. and McIntosh, C. N. (2017). Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Operations Management, 52, 1–14.Google Scholar
Lonati, S., Quiroga, B. F., Zehnder, C. and Antonakis, J. (2018). On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 19–40.Google Scholar
Lu, G., Ding, X. D., Peng, D. X. and Chuang, H. H.-C. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in operations management research: Recent developments, common problems, and directions for future research. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 53–64.Google Scholar
McElroy, J. C. and Morrow, P. C. (2010). Employee reactions to office redesign: A naturally occurring quasi-field experiment in a multi-generational setting. Human Relations, 63(5), 609–636.Google Scholar
Perdue, B. C. and Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 317–326.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M. and Podsakoff, N. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweiger, D. M. and Denisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal-field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110–135.Google Scholar
Semadeni, M., Withers, M. C. and Certo, T. S. (2014). The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1070–1079.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R. and Cook, T. D. (2009). The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 607–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Workman, M. and Bommer, W. (2004). Redesigning computer call center work: A longitudinal field experiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 317–337.Google Scholar
Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×