Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:25:41.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part Three - Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

Edited by
Adam Ledgeway  and
Martin Maiden
Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 319 - 488
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Becker, M., Clemens, L., and Nevins, A. (2017). ‘Generalization of French and Portuguese plural alternations and initial syllable protection’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35: 299–345.Google Scholar
Cristófaro-Silva, T. (2002). ‘Organização fonológica de marcas de plural no português brasileiro: uma abordagem multirrepresentacional’, Revista da Abralin 11: 273–306.Google Scholar
Dokulil, M. ([1958] 1994). ‘On morphological oppositions’. In Luelsdorff, P. A., Panenová, J., and, Sgall, P. (eds), Praguiana 1945–1990, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 113–30.Google Scholar
Hualde, I. and Chițoran, I. (2016). ‘Surface sound and underlying structure: the phonetics–phonology interface’, In Fischer, S. and Gabriel, C. (eds), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M. (2001). ‘Di nuovo sulle alternanze “velari” nel verbo italiano e spagnolo’, Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 8: 39–61.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1965). ‘De la morphonologie’, La Linguistique 1: 1–30.Google Scholar
Nevins, A. (2011). ‘Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection’. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2357–82.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. (2015). ‘The origin and spread of velar allomorphy in the Spanish verb: a morphomic approach’, Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 92: 489–518.Google Scholar
Salvioni, C. (1900). ‘A proposito di amiś’, Romania 29: 546–58.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, P. (1972). ‘Sull’alternanza morfematica nel verbo italiano’, Linguistica 12: 269–300.Google Scholar
Touratier, C. (1987). ‘Morphologie du verbe italien dans une perspective contrastive’, Cahiers d’Etudes Romanes 12: 267–82.Google Scholar
Tuttle, E. (1995). ‘On placing northern Italian noun singulars from plurals of the type amís “friend” within a theory of optimality and markedness’, Romance Philology 48: 389–415.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baerman, M., Brown, D., and Corbett, G. (eds) (2015). Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2016). Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. and Blevins, J. (eds) (2009). Analogy in Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2010). The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruschina, S., Maiden, M., and Smith, J. C. (eds) (2013). The Boundaries of Pure Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luís, A. and Bermúdez-Otero, R. (eds) (2016). The Morphome Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (2018). The Romance Verb. Morphomic Structure and Diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M., Smith, J. C., Goldbach, M., and Hinzelin, M.-O. (eds) (2011). Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sims, A. (2016). Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, G. (2016). Inflectional Paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Aski, J. (1995). ‘Verbal suppletion: an analysis of Italian, French and Spanish to go’, Linguistics 33: 403–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börjars, K. and Vincent, N. (2011). ‘The pre-conditions for suppletion’. In Galani, A., Hicks, G., and Toulas, G. (eds), Morphology and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 239–65.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2007). ‘Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words’. Language 83: 8–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985). ‘Sur le statut de la suppléance dans la Morphologie Naturelle’, Langages 78: 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fertig, D. (1998). ‘Suppletion, natural morphology and diagrammaticity’, Linguistics 36: 1065–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juge, M. (1999). ‘On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 25: 183–94.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (2004). ‘When lexemes become allomorphs: on the genesis of suppletion’, Folia Linguistica 38: 227–56.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (2014). ‘Two suppletive adjectives in Megleno-Romanian’. Revue Romane. 49: 32–51.Google Scholar
Melčuk, I. (2000). ‘Suppletion’. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C., & Mugdan, J. (eds), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 510–22.Google Scholar
Nurmio, S. (2017). ‘The development and typology of number suppletion in adjectives’, Diachronica 34: 127–74.Google Scholar
Rudes, B. (1980). ‘On the nature of verbal suppletion’, Linguistics 18: 655–76.Google Scholar
Veselinova, L. (2006). Suppletion in Verb Paradigms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical Plurals. A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baerman, M. (2015). ‘Introduction’. In Baerman, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Inflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–8.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2006). ‘Inflection and derivation’. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 654–61.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985a). Morphonology. The Dynamics of Derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Forza, F. and Scalise, S. (2016). ‘Compounding’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 524–37.Google Scholar
Hacken, P. Ten (2014). ‘Delineating derivation and inflection’. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10–25.Google Scholar
Karlsson, K. E. (1981). Syntax and Affixation. The Evolution of mente in Latin and Romance. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., and Rainer, F. (eds) (2015). Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. (2014). ‘Delineating derivation and compounding’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31.Google Scholar
Rainer, F. (2016). ‘Derivational morphology’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 513–23.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. and Bisetto, A. (2009). ‘The classification of compounds’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34–53.Google Scholar
Štekauer, P. (2015a). ‘The delimitation of derivation and inflection’. In Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., and Rainer, F. (eds), Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 218–34.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Alonso, A. (1954). Estudios lingüísticos: temas españoles. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Bello, A. (1847). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Santiago de Chile: Imprenta del Progreso.Google Scholar
Camproux, C. (1951). ‘Déficience et vitalité de la dérivation’, Le Français moderne 19: 181–86.Google Scholar
Cazacu, B. (1950). ‘Despre unele forme verbale cu sufixe diminutivale’, Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 1: 91–98.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. and Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1994). Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eddington, D. (2017). ‘Dialectal variation in Spanish diminutives: a performance model’, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10: 39–66.Google Scholar
Hasselrot, B. (1957). Étude sur la formation diminutive dans les langues romanes. Uppsala: Lundequist.Google Scholar
Maurer, T. Jr. (1969). ‘Um sufixo de comportamento original: o diminutivo em -zinho’. In Barbadinho Neto, R. (ed.), Estudos em homagem a Cândido Jucá (filho). Rio de Janeiro: Simões, 233–46.Google Scholar
Napoli, D. J., and Reynolds, B. (1995). ‘Evaluative affixes in Italian’. In Booij, G. and van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Dordrecht: Springer, 151–78.Google Scholar
Stump, G. (1993). ‘How peculiar is evaluative morphology?’, Journal of Linguistics 29: 1–36.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. L. (1952). ‘Das ‟Diminutiv” im Portugiesischen’, Orbis 1: 460–76.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A., and Pullum, G. (1987). ‘Plain morphology and expressive morphology’. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1987: 330–40.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Bauer, B. (2004). ‘Vigesimal numerals in Romance: an Indo-European perspective’. In Drinka, B. (ed.), Indo-European Language and Culture in Historical Perspective: Essays in Memory of Edgar C. Polomé. General Linguistics 41, 21–46.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. (2017). Nominal Apposition in Indo-European. Forms, Functions and Its Evolution in Latin-Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. (2021). ‘The formation of numerals in the Romance languages’. In Loporcaro, M. and Gardani, F. (eds), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.685Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (1992). ‘Italic’. In Gvozdanović, J. (ed.), Indo-European Numerals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 389–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (2003). ‘Numeral systems in the languages in Europe and North and Central Asia: preliminary results from the WALS database’. In Suihkonen, P. and Comrie, B. (eds), Collection of Papers, International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Izhevsk: Udmurt State University, 32–41.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1978). ‘Numeral systems’. In Greenberg, J. (ed), Universals of Human Language. 3. Word Structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 251–95.Google Scholar
Klein, H. A. (1974). The Science of Measurement. A Historical Survey. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1973 [1904]). Manual de gramática histórica española, 14th ed. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Price, G. (1992). ‘Romance’. In Gvozdanović, J. (ed.), Indo-European Numerals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 447–97.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. 3. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before Writing. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zeshan, U., Delgado, C., Dikyuva, D., Panda, C., and de Vos, C. (2013). ‘Cardinal numerals in rural sign languages: approaching cross-modal typology’, Linguistic Typology 17: 357–96.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Morphology
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Morphology
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Morphology
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.012
Available formats
×