The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 1: Building a Program of Research
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I From Idea to Reality: The Basics of Research
- Part II The Building Blocks of a Study
- Part III Data Collection
- Part IV Statistical Approaches
- Part V Tips for a Successful Research Career
- 29 Designing a Line of Research
- 30 Successfully Publishing Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- 31 Presenting Your Research
- 32 Building Fruitful Collaborations
- 33 Performing a Good Peer Review
- 34 Handling Submitted Manuscripts: As Editor and Author
- 35 Grant Writing Basics
- 36 Teaching Research Methods and Statistics
- 37 Working Outside Academia
- Index
- References
36 - Teaching Research Methods and Statistics
from Part V - Tips for a Successful Research Career
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I From Idea to Reality: The Basics of Research
- Part II The Building Blocks of a Study
- Part III Data Collection
- Part IV Statistical Approaches
- Part V Tips for a Successful Research Career
- 29 Designing a Line of Research
- 30 Successfully Publishing Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- 31 Presenting Your Research
- 32 Building Fruitful Collaborations
- 33 Performing a Good Peer Review
- 34 Handling Submitted Manuscripts: As Editor and Author
- 35 Grant Writing Basics
- 36 Teaching Research Methods and Statistics
- 37 Working Outside Academia
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter can serve either as a starting point or a recharging point for instructors who are preparing to teach research methods and/or statistics at the college or graduate level. Using empirical work and experience, I’ll discuss the importance of these classes and then provide a list of what I perceive to be the most important recommendations and biggest challenges related to teaching these courses. Because so many classes include projects, I have dedicated half of the recommendations and challenges to the ones that involve student projects. It is my hope that a person reading this takes away a set of ideas and feels empowered to teach these courses well. For all the challenges, teaching these classes can be rewarding for the instructor and transformative for the student.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral SciencesVolume 1: Building a Program of Research, pp. 773 - 792Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adam, H. & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P. J. & Baughman, F. D. (2016). Active learning in research methods classes is associated with higher knowledge and confidence, though not evaluations or satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, March 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., et al. (2015). A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092Google Scholar
Burkley, E. & Burkley, M. (2009). Mythbusters: A tool for teaching research methods in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, D. M., Fox, E. L., Greenstein, M., Olbright, G., & Montgomery, D. (2019). An old task in new clothes: A preregistered direct replication attempt of enclothed cognition effects on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: A consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659Google Scholar
Chen, J., Hui, L. S., Yu, T., et al. (2021). Foregone opportunities and choosing not to act: Replications of inaction inertia effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619900570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corts, D. P. & Tatum, H. E. (2019). Ethics in Psychological Research: A Practical Guide for the Student Scientist. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Cuccolo, K. (2019). Engaging in cross-cultural research with Psi Chi’s Network for International Collaborative Exchange (NICE). Eye on Psi Chi, 23(4), 46–47. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-9812.Eye23.4.46Google Scholar
Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Zlokovich, M. S., Grahe, J., & Edlund, J. E. (2021). What crowdsourcing can offer to cross-cultural psychological science. Cross-Cultural Research, 55(1), 3-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBruine, L. (2020). faux: Simulation for factorial designs (0.0.1.2) [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2669586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flake, J. K. & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393Google Scholar
Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., et al. (2017). A collaborative approach to infant research: Promoting reproducibility, best practices, and theory-building. Infancy: The Official Journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, 22(4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, M. C. & Saxe, R. (2012). Teaching replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 600–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460686Google Scholar
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319030111Google Scholar
Friedrich, J., Buday, E., & Kerr, D. (2000). Statistical training in psychology: A national survey and commentary on undergraduate programs. Teaching of Psychology, 27(4), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahe, J. E. (2017). Authentic research projects benefit students, their instructors, and science. In Obeid, R., Schwartz, A., Shane-Simpson, C., & Brooks, P. J. (eds.), How We Teach Now: The GSTA Guide to Student-Centered Teaching (pp. 351–367). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Available at: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/howweteachnow.Google Scholar
Grahe, J. E., Reifman, A., Hermann, A. D., et al. (2012). Harnessing the undiscovered resource of student research projects. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 605–607. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurung, R. A. R. & Stoa, R. (2020). A national survey of teaching and learning research methods: Important concepts and faculty and student perspectives. Teaching of Psychology, 47(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320901374Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. X. D., Smith, E. N., Au, C., et al. (2018). Improving the replicability of psychological science through pedagogy. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917740427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heene, M. & Ferguson, C. J. (2017). Psychological science’s aversion to the null, and why many of the things you think are true, aren’t. In Lilienfeld, S. O. & Waldman, I. D (eds.), Psychological Science under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions (pp. 34–52). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzahan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., Allstadt Torras, R., et al. (2020). How to teach open science principles in the undergraduate curriculum: The Hagen Cumulative Science Project. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719868149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuh, G. D. 2008. High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
LaCosse, J., Ainsworth, S. E., Shepherd, M. A., et al. (2017). An active-learning approach to fostering understanding of research methods in large classes. Teaching of Psychology, 44(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317692614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrum, R. E. & Clark, J. (2005). Graduate admissions criteria in psychology: An update. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.2.481-484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langkjӕr-Bain, R. (2019). The troubling legacy of Francis Galton. Significance, 16(3), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, O. & Chalk, H. M. (2020). Belonging and marital perception variances in emerging adults with differing disability identities. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 25(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN25.1.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & Spence, J. C. (2000). Effects of within-class grouping on student achievement: An exploratory model. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598748Google Scholar
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., et al. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058Google Scholar
O’Neill, G. & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In Neill, B. O, Moore, S., & McMullin, B. (eds.), Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (pp. 27–36). All Ireland Society for Higher Education.Google Scholar
Olson-McBride, L., Hassemer, H., & Hoepner, J. (2016). Broadening participation: Engaging academically at-risk freshmen in undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 37(1), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Science Collaboration (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, B. & McCann, L. I. (2005). Undergraduate research experiences in psychology: A national study of courses and curricula. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3201_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintana, D. S. (2021). Replication studies for undergraduate theses to improve science and education. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1117–1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01192-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajecki, D. W., Appleby, D., Williams, C. C., Johnson, K., & Jeschke, M. P. (2005). Statistics can wait: Career plans activity and course preferences of American psychology undergraduates. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 4(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2004.4.2.83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reifman, A. & Grahe, J. E. (2016). Introduction to the special issue of emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815588022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, A. S. & Hagan, L. K. (2011). promoting higher level thinking in psychology: Is active learning the answer? Teaching of Psychology, 38(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311401581Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108Google Scholar
Sizemore, O. J. & Lewandowski, G. W. (2011). Lesson learned: Using clinical examples for teaching research methods. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2011.10.1.25Google Scholar
Skulborstad, H. M. & Hermann, A. D. (2016). Individual difference predictors of the experience of emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815579820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for the Teaching of Psychology (n.d.) Project syllabus description. Available at: http://teachpsych.org/otrp/syllabi/index.php.Google Scholar
Stowell, J. R. & Addison, W. E. (eds.). (2017). Activities for Teaching Statistics and Research Methods: A Guide for Psychology Instructors. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000024-000Google Scholar
Sutherland, C. L., Hildebrandt, L., Wagge, J. R., et al. (2021). Troy, Ford, McRae, Zarolia, & Mauss (2017). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9SR2KGoogle Scholar
Wagge, J. R., Brandt, M. J., Lazarevic, L. B., et al. (2019). Publishing research with undergraduate students via replication work: The Collaborative Replications and Education Project. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00247Google Scholar
Wagge, J. R., Hurst, M. A., Brandt, M. J., Lazarevic, L. B., Legate, N., & Grahe, J. E. (2022). Teaching research in principle and in practice: What do psychology instructors think of research projects in their Courses? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221101942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, J. D., Mills, A. S., & Raffa, E. R. (2016). An effective intervention in research methods that reduces psychology majors’ sexist prejudices. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316649314Google Scholar