Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:10:16.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - Qualitative Analysis

from Part IV - Statistical Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2023

By
Nicky Hayes
Edited by
Austin Lee Nichols  and
John Edlund
Austin Lee Nichols
Affiliation:
Central European University, Vienna
John Edlund
Affiliation:
Rochester Institute of Technology, New York
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we will discuss the “big four” approaches to qualitative analysis – qualitative content analysis, thematic analysis, grounded theory, and discourse analysis – before briefly describing four additional commonly used approaches. Some of these approaches are empirical, either theory-driven or inductive, identifying observable concepts in the data. In others, research is from a social constructionist perspective, incorporating the researcher’s interpretation as an essential part of the analysis. Some methods, such as thematic analysis, can be used for either approach. This epistemological range means that, as with quantitative analyses, it is essential to select the appropriate method for analyzing the data, and the rigorous procedures involved in qualitative methodology must be followed meticulously.

Keywords

Thematic AnalysisGrounded TheoryQualitative Content AnalysisDiscourse AnalysisEpistemology
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
Volume 1: Building a Program of Research
 , pp. 606 - 626
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadvand, M. (2011). Critical discourse analysis an introduction to major approaches. Dinamika Bahasa Dan Budaya, 5(1), 82–90 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_4Google Scholar
Andrews, M., Squire, S., & Tamboukou, M. (2013). Doing Narrative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Atawneh, A. M. (2008). The discourse of war in the Middle East: Analysis of media reporting. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2),263–278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbie, E. (1992). The Practice of Social Research. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beloff, H. (1997). Making and un-making identities: A psychologist looks at art-work. In Hayes, N. (ed.), Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology (pp. 55–68). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bieneck, S. (2009). How adequate is the vignette technique as a research tool for psycho-legal research? In Oswald, M. E., Bieneck, S., & Hupfeld-Heinemann, J. (eds.), Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. & Harris, T. (1978). The Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. (2019). The Varieties of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A. & Charmaz, K. (2010). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cho, J. Y. & Lee, E-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Daghigh, A. J & Rahim, H. A. (2020). Representation of Muslim minorities in politicians’ discourse: Jacinda Ardern vs. Donald Trump. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1773099Google Scholar
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gill, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: Practical implementation. In Richardson, J. T. E. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods. BPS Books.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.Google Scholar
Graneheim, U. H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2),105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001Google Scholar
Grounded Theory Institute (2008). What is grounded theory? Available at: www.groundedtheory.com/what-is-gt.aspx.Google Scholar
Hayes, N. (2021). Doing Psychological Research, 2nd ed. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, N. (ed.) (1997a). Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, N. (1997b). Theory-led thematic analysis. In Hayes, N. (ed.), Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology (pp. 93–114). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (2011). The Practice of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Hseih, H-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687Google Scholar
Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Zeisel, H. (1932). Marienthal: The Sociography of an Unemployed Community. Aldine. (English ed. 1971, Routledge).Google Scholar
Kiernan, M. D. and Hill, M. (2018). Framework analysis: a whole paradigm approach.Qualitative Research Journal, 18(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00008Google Scholar
Krauss, S. E. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The Qualitative Report. 10(4), 758–770. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1831Google Scholar
Masroor, F., Khan, Q. N., Aib, I., & Ali, Z. (2019). Polarization and ideological weaving in Twitter discourse of politicians. Social Media and Society. October–December, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119891220.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. William Morrow.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B. (1990). New methods for qualitative data collection: Vignettes and pre-structured cases. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839900030104Google Scholar
Miller, T., Velleman, R., Rigby, K., et al. (1997). The use of vignettes in the analysis of interview data: Relatives of people with drug problems. In Hayes, N. (ed.), Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology (pp. 201–226). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nortio, E., Varjonen, S. Mähönen, T. A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2016). Interpretive repertoires of multiculturalism: Supporting and challenging hierarchical intergroup relations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 2195–3325. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.639Google Scholar
Parker, I. (1994). Discourse analysis. In Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (eds.), Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N. & Henwood, K. (1997). Using grounded theory in psychological research. In Hayes, N. (ed.), Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology (pp. 245–274). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N. & Henwood, K. (2004). Grounded theory. In Hardy, M. A. & Bryman, A. (eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. In: Richardson, J. T. E. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods. BPS Books.Google Scholar
Potter, W. J. & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (eds.), Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Huberman, M. A. & Miles, M. B. (eds.), The Qualitative Research Companion. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton-Nicholls, C. & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (pp. 769–802. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569Google Scholar
Sherrard, C. (1997). Repertoires in discourse: Social identification and aesthetic taste. In Hayes, N. (ed.), Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology (pp. 69–92). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Singh, S. & Estefan, A. (2018). Selecting a grounded theory approach for nursing research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/333393618799571Google Scholar
Smith, T. (2020). The Root and Uses of Marketing Knowledge. deGruyter.Google Scholar
Squire, C. (2013). From experience-centred to socially-oriented approaches to narrative. In Andrews, M., Squire, S., & Tamboukou, M. (eds.), Doing Narrative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Srivastava, A. & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance, 4(2), 72–79.Google Scholar
Stenner, P. (1993). Discoursing jealousy. In E. Burnam & A. Parker (eds.), Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. Routledge.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020Google Scholar
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686Google Scholar
Thornberg, R. Perhamus, L. M., & Charmaz, K. (2015). Grounded theory. In Saracho, O. (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Early Childhood Education. Volume 1 (pp. 405–439). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M.D. (2010). Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20, 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.xGoogle Scholar
Ussher, J. M. & Mooney-Somers, J. (2000). Negotiating desire and sexual subjectivity: Narratives of young Lesbian Avengers. Sexualities. 3, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346000003002005Google Scholar
Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17, 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250Google Scholar
Weber, R. P. (1990) Basic Content Analysis. SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts, and its development. In Wodak, R. and Meyers, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230288423_3Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Qualitative Analysis
  • Edited by Austin Lee Nichols, Central European University, Vienna, John Edlund, Rochester Institute of Technology, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Online publication: 25 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010054.029
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Qualitative Analysis
  • Edited by Austin Lee Nichols, Central European University, Vienna, John Edlund, Rochester Institute of Technology, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Online publication: 25 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010054.029
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Qualitative Analysis
  • Edited by Austin Lee Nichols, Central European University, Vienna, John Edlund, Rochester Institute of Technology, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Online publication: 25 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010054.029
Available formats
×