Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:54:43.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Demystifying the Digital

A Case for Hybrid Ethnography in IS

from Part II - Methodological Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

By
Nicola Ens ,
Mari-Klara Stein  and
Tina Blegind Jensen
Edited by
Boyka Simeonova  and
Robert D. Galliers
Boyka Simeonova
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Robert D. Galliers
Affiliation:
Bentley University, Massachusetts and Warwick Business School
Get access

Summary

An increasingly pervasive digital environment, where technologies mediate social interaction within and outside organizations, creates new rich data sources for IS research. Of primacy to IS scholars, who study phenomena at the intersection of technology, people and organization, is how future research designs can capture such ongoing sociotechnical entanglements occurring in hybrid online and offline spaces. Building on lessons learned from a study of platform workers, this chapter explores three key challenges of a hybrid ethnographic approach to IS research: (1) navigating unbounded fieldsites; (2) managing technological opacity; (3) working with diverse data. The chapter guides researchers by demonstrating how hybrid methods can be used in different configurations across diverse settings. Simultaneously, in the age of web crawlers, data scraping and machine learning, processes that are invaluable in their own rights, this chapter resituates a qualitative ethnographic approach to digital data, introducing participatory digital observation to the rich empirics gathered in face-to-face environments. Rather than reproducing the valuable work done by scholars in digital sociology and ethnography, this chapter brings strands of the conversation together, highlighting the benefits of studying IS phenomena as a hybrid that exists both in physical and virtual spaces.

Keywords

ethnographydigital ethnographyhybrid ethnographyqualitative methodsInformation Systems researchdigital methods
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research , pp. 125 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, P. (2015). For Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avital, M., Mathiassen, L. and Schultze, U. (2017). Alternative genres in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(3), 240–247.Google Scholar
Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C. and Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data and Society, 3(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199.Google Scholar
Christin, A. (2020). The ethnographer and the algorithm: Beyond the black box. Theory and Society, 49(5–6), 897–918.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 487–505.Google Scholar
Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, A., Endter, F., Giordano, A. and Somers, P. (2019). Three stages to a virtual workforce. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I. and Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, I. (2019). Working, being, and researching in place: A mixed methodological approach for understanding digital experiences. In Mir, R. and Jain, S. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar
Erickson, I. (2010). Geography and community: New forms of interaction among people and places. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1194–1207.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2014). Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 849–872.Google Scholar
Hafner, K. and Lyon, M. (1998). Where Wizards Stay up Late: The Origins of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hedman, J., Srinivasan, N. and Lindgren, R. (2013). Digital traces of information systems: Sociomateriality made researchable. International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2017). From the virtual to the embedded, embodied, everyday internet. In Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Galloway, A. and Bell, G. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. Abingdon, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Milton Park, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Howison, J., Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 767–797.Google Scholar
Hultin, L. (2019). On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology. Information and Organization, 29(2), 91–104.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Markham, A. and Baym, N. (2009). Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marres, N. (2017). Digital Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Möhlmann, M. and Zalmanson, L. (2018). Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers. International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
Oates, B. J. (2006). Researching Information Systems and Computing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Portland, OR: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, K. (2012). Ethnographic Methods. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østerlund, C., Crowston, K. and Jackson, C. (2020). Building an apparatus: Refractive, reflective, and diffractive readings of trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Ottenberg, S. (2019). Thirty years of fieldnotes: Changing relationships to the text. In Sanjek, R. (ed.), Fieldnotes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 139–160.Google Scholar
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. and Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Postill, J. and Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134.Google Scholar
Przybylski, L. (2020). Hybrid Ethnography: Online, Offline, and in between. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2015). Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2009). The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schultze, U. (2010). Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: A review. Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 434–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 24(1), 3–40.Google Scholar
Scott, S. V. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2012). Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 26–40.Google Scholar
Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data and Society, 4(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Sergeeva, A. V., Faraj, S. and Huysman, M. (2020). Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organization Science, 31(5), 1248–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaast, E. and Urquhart, C. (2018). Building grounded theory with social media data. In Mir, R. and Jain, S. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 408–421.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×