Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:03:26.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Case Study Research Revisited

from Part II - Methodological Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

By
Boyka Simeonova  and
Guy Fitzgerald
Edited by
Boyka Simeonova  and
Robert D. Galliers
Boyka Simeonova
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Robert D. Galliers
Affiliation:
Bentley University, Massachusetts and Warwick Business School
Get access

Summary

The chapter re-examines the case study research method and its role and contribution to the IS discipline and focuses on the current status of the case study research and the increased digitalization. The advantages of qualitative interpretive cases studies are identified, recent case studies are described and analyzed, and their contributions highlighted. These examples continue to enhance the discipline and sustain the traditional benefits of the case study research through rich data, analysis and understanding the links between people, organizations and technologies, the advancement and expansion of theory, the identification of hidden aspects, and the emergence of new concepts and theorization. Two of the cases use trace data, a type of data emerging as a product of digitalization. While these cases provide contributions, they also challenge the traditional understanding of what a case study is, and the benefits that accrue. The chapter emphasizes the need for mixed-method and multi-method case studies research in addition to trace data to enhance the benefits of the case study research.

Keywords

case study researchqualitative methoddigitalizationtrace datamixed-method researchmulti-method research
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research , pp. 140 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aczel, P. (2016). Case study method. International Journal of Sales, Retailing and Marketing, 4(9), 15–22.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. V. and Bogusz, C. I. (2019). Self-organizing in blockchain infrastructures: Generativity through shifting objectives and forking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(9), 1242–1275.Google Scholar
Avgerou, C. (2019). Contextual explanation: Alternative approaches and persistent challenges. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 977–1006.Google Scholar
Avgerou, C. (2001). The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Information Systems Journal, 11(1), 43–63.Google Scholar
Baskerville, R. (1999). Investigating information systems with action research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(19), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. and Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 368–386.Google Scholar
Bryant, A., Black, A., Land, F. and Porra, J. (2013). Information systems history: What is history? What is IS history? What IS history? … and why even bother with history? Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975). The case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 178–193.Google Scholar
Cavaye, A. L. (1996). Case study research: A multi‐faceted research approach for IS. Information Systems Journal, 6(3), 227–242.Google Scholar
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2011). On methods, methodologies and how they matter. European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Chanias, S., Myers, M. D. and Hess, T. (2019). Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
Chen, W. and Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M., Kahn, D. and Steeves, R. (2000). How to analyze the data. In Cohen, M., Kahn, D. and Steeves, R. (eds), Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research: A Practical Guide for Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Darke, P., Shanks, G. and Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273–289.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (2000). Information systems conceptual foundations: Looking backward and forward. In Baskerville, R., Stage, J. and DeGross, J. (eds), Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology. Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1983). Interpretive interactionism. In Morgan, G. (ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar
Diefenbach, T. (2009). Are case studies more than sophisticated storytelling?: Methodological problems of qualitative empirical research mainly based on semi-structured interviews. Quality & Quantity, 43(6), 875–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, W. D., Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E. and Ying, W. (2019). Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: A blockchain implementation study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 50–65.Google Scholar
Dubé, L. and Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597–636.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Faraj, S. and Johnson, L. (2011). Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organization Science, 22(6), 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, G. and Russo, N. (2005). The turnaround of the London ambulance service computer-aided despatch system. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 244–257.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 301–316.Google Scholar
Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating case study and survey research methods: An example in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112–126.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Y. (2010). The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook. Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyttinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2014). Towards generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 850–871.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1965). Temporal aspects as a non-scheduled status passage. American Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 48–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grover, V., Lindberg, A., Benbasat, I. and Lyytinen, K. (2020). The perils and promises of big data research in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(2), 268–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanseth, O. and Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R. and Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. K. (2012). A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howison, J., Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 767–787.Google Scholar
Johansson, R. (2003). Case study methodology. A keynote speech at the International Conference ‘Methodologies in Research’ organized by the Royal Institute of Technology in cooperation with the International Association of People–Environment Studies, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B. and Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 571–586.Google Scholar
Kenny, M. and Fourie, R. (2014). Tracing the history of grounded theory methodology: From formation to fragmentation. Qualitative Report, 19(52), 1–9.Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data Society, 1(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Klein, H. and Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.Google Scholar
Kling, J. L. (2004). Rob Kling and the Irvine School. Information Society: An International Journal, 20(2), 97–99.Google Scholar
Lee, A. S. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
Lee, A. S. and Baskerville, R. (2012). Conceptualizing generalizability: New contributions and a reply. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 749–761.Google Scholar
Lee, A. S. and Baskerville, R. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221–243.Google Scholar
Lengermann, P. (1978). The founding of the American Sociological Review: The anatomy of a rebellion. American Sociological Review, 44(2), 185–198.Google Scholar
Leong, C., Pan, S., Bahri, S. and Fauzi, A. (2019). Social media empowerment in social movements: Power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 173–204.Google Scholar
Mann, F. C. and Williams, L. K. (1960). Observations on the dynamics of a change to electronic data-processing equipment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(2), 216–256.Google Scholar
Markus, M. L. (1981). Implementation politics: Top management support and user involvement. Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 1(4), 203–215.Google Scholar
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (1978). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 590–601.Google Scholar
Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 234–249.Google Scholar
Modell, S. (2005). Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 231–254.Google Scholar
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative Research in Business and Management, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Myers, M. D. (1999). Investigating information systems with ethnographic research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(23), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. and Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, S. L. and Tan, B. (2011). Demystifying case research: A structured–pragmatic–situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Information and Organization, 21(3), 161–176.Google Scholar
Peng, G. C. and Nunes, M. (2009). Identification and assessment of risks associated with ERP post‐implementation in China. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(5), 587–614.Google Scholar
Peng, G. C., Nunes, M. and Annansingh, F. (2011). Investigating information systems with mixed-methods research. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Systems Research Trends, Approaches and Methodologies, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Pentland, T., Recker, J., Wolf, J. R. and Wyner, G. (2020). Bringing context inside process research with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(5), 1214–1236.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (2012). Context and action in the transformation of the firm: A reprise. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1304–1328.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649–670.Google Scholar
Pinsonneault, A. and Kraemer, K. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems: An assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockart, J. and Flannery, L. (1983). The management of end-user computing. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 776–785.Google Scholar
Sarker, S., Xiao, X., Beaulieu, T. and Lee, A. S. (2018a). Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (part 1/2). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(8), 752–774.Google Scholar
Sarker, S., Xiao, X., Beaulieu, T. and Lee, A. S. (2018b). Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (part 2/2). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(9), 909–923.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Steel, D., Gonnerman, C. and O’Rourke, M. (2017). Scientists’ attitudes on science and values: Case studies and survey methods in philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 63(2017), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 273–285.Google Scholar
Swanborn, P. G. (2010). Case Study Research, What, Why and How? London: Sage.Google Scholar
Tellis, W. (1997). The Qualitative Report, https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol3/iss2/4/.Google Scholar
Tsang, E. W. (2014). Case studies and generalization in information systems research: A critical realist perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 174–186.Google Scholar
Tumele, S. (2015). Case study research. International Journal of Sales, Retailing & Marketing, 4(9), 68–78.Google Scholar
Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L. and Negoita, B. (2017). Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1178–1205.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Brown, A. and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guide for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 855–878.Google Scholar
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.Google Scholar
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. and Starr, R. H. (2004). Sociological Rob: How Rob Kling brought computing and sociology. Information Society: An International Journal, 20(2), 91–95.Google Scholar
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications, 6th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). How to do better case studies. In Bickman, L. and Rog, D. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 256–280.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×