Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-zpzq9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T09:26:02.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital acquired infection

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
Jan Stygall  and
Stanton Newman
Edited by
Susan Ayers ,
Andrew Baum ,
Chris McManus ,
Stanton Newman ,
Kenneth Wallston ,
John Weinman  and
Robert West
Jan Stygall
Affiliation:
University College London
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College London
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Any infection not present or incubating at the time of admission into hospital is classified as a nosocomial infection and is often referred to as a hospital acquired infection (HAI). Approximately 1 in 10 patients acquire an infection after admission into hospital of which it has been estimated that 30% or more could be prevented (Gastmeier, 2004).

Urinary tract infection (usually catheter-associated), surgical-site infection, bloodstream infections and pneumonia (usually ventilator-associated) account for more than 80% of all HAIs. The most frequently occurring infections are urinary tract accounting for approximately 35% of HAIs however they are associated with the lowest mortality and cost (see ‘Urinary tract symptoms’). Surgical-site infections account for around 20% and are third in cost whereas bloodstream infections and pneumonia are less common, explaining about 15% each; however these are linked with much higher mortality and costs. While the rates of both urinary tract and surgical-site infections have recently declined slightly, bloodstream infections and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are rapidly rising. Patients in intensive care units account for 25% of HAI cases with nearly 70% being attributed to micro-organisms that are resistant to one or more antibiotics (Burke, 2003).

Among the factors that promote HAI are underlying diseases and decreased patient immunity, invasive diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, widespread antimicrobial resistance, lack of infection control measures and environmental hygiene (Lazzari et al., 2004). However, the exact extent to which the environment plays a part is largely unknown.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 736 - 738
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). The theory of planned behaviour. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
Burke, J. P. (2003). Infection control – a problem for patient safety. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 651–6.Google Scholar
Dancer, S. J. (2004). How do we assess hospital cleaning? A proposal for microbiological standards for surface hygiene in hospitals. Journal of Hospital Infection, 56, 10–15.Google Scholar
Gastmeier, P. (2004). Nosocomial infection surveillance and control policies. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 17, 295–301.Google Scholar
Girou, E., Chai, S. H., Oppein, F.et al. (2004). Misuse of gloves: the foundation for poor compliance with hand hygiene and potential for microbial transmission?Journal of Hospital Infection, 57, 162–9.Google Scholar
Godin, G., Naccache, H. & Fortin, C. (1998). Understanding physicians' intentions to use a simple infection control measure: wearing gloves. American Journal for Infection Control, 26, 413–17.Google Scholar
Jenner, E. A., Watson, P. W. B., Miller, L., Jones, F. & Scott, G. M. (2002). Explaining hand hygiene practice: an extended application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 7, 311–26.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. M., Elward, A. M. & Fraser, V. J. (2004). Survey of knowledge, beliefs, and practices of neonatal intensive care unit healthcare workers regarding noscomial infections, central venous catheter care, and hand hygiene. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 25, 747–52.Google Scholar
Lazzari, S., Allegranzi, B. & Concia, B. (2004). Making hospitals safer: the need for a global strategy for infection control in health care settings. World Hospital Health Service, 40, 36–42.Google Scholar
Levin, P. F. (1999). Test of the Fishbein and Ajzen models as predictors of health care workers' glove use. Research in Nursing & Health, 22, 295–307.Google Scholar
McGuckin, M., Waterman, R., Storr, J.et al. (2001). Evaluation of patient-empowering hand hygiene programme in the UK. Journal of Hospital Infection, 48, 222–7.Google Scholar
O'Boyle, C. A., Henly, S. J. & Larson, E. (2001). Understanding adherence to hand hygiene recommendations: the theory of planned behavior. American Journal of Infection Control, 29, 352–60.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. (2003). Influences on compliance with standard precautions among operating room nurses. American Journal of Infection Control, 31, 415–23.Google Scholar
Pittet, D., Simon, A., Hugonnet, S.et al. (2004). Hand hygiene among physicians: Performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 1–8.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 94–124.Google Scholar
Sen, R., Keaney, M., Trail, A., Howard, C. & Chadwick, P. (1999). Healthcare workers washed their hands on only a third of occasions. British Medical Journal, 319, 518.Google Scholar
Seto, W. H. (1995). Training the work force – models for effective education in infection control. Journal of Infection Control, 30(Suppl.) 241–7.Google Scholar
Stone, S., Kibbler, C., How, A. & Balestrini, A. (2000). Feedback is necessary in strategies to reduce hospital acquired infection. British Medical Journal, 321, 302.Google Scholar
Williams, C. O., Campbell, S., Henry, K. & Collier, P. (1994). Variables influencing worker compliance with universal precautions in the emergency department. American Journal of Infection Control, 22, 138–48.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×