Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T23:14:14.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender issues and women's health

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
Jane M. Ussher
Edited by
Susan Ayers ,
Andrew Baum ,
Chris McManus ,
Stanton Newman ,
Kenneth Wallston ,
John Weinman  and
Robert West
Jane M. Ussher
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

The legacy of early critiques of women's health

Thirty years ago Women's Health was a field fighting for recognition in a world dominated by androcentric research, theory and clinical intervention. Today it is a rich and vibrant body of work, spanning many diverse disciplines. The health of women is now firmly on the agenda of the World Health Organization, government and research funding bodies, providers of health services and educators. Researchers, theorists and social activists continue to move knowledge and practice forwards, improving service provision for women, at the same time as we reach a greater understanding of ‘what women want’ regarding their health.

Yet it hasn't always been this way. The last few decades of the twentieth century have seen the publication of a number of groundbreaking studies and critical polemics which highlighted the paucity of knowledge about the health and wellbeing of women. They documented how women's bodies, women's minds, and by extension, women's lives have historically been marginalized, ignored or dealt with in a detrimental way by mainstream health professions. Whole disciplines such as medicine, psychology and psychiatry were subjected to critical scrutiny. It was argued that women's mental health was defined in relation to man as the norm, and inevitably found wanting as a result. Femininity was pathologized, with mental health treatments merely serving as vehicles of social control, pushing women back into patterns of behaviour and social roles which were sources of distress and despair in the first place.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 92 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C.D. (2002). Female survivors of sexual abuse. London: Routledge.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: the truth about the male and female brain. London: Perseus.
Bebbington, P. (1996). The origins of sex differences in depressive disorder: bridging the gap. International Review of Psychiatry, 8, 295–332.Google Scholar
Bebbington, P. E. (1998). Sex and depression, Psychological Medicine, 28, 1–8.Google Scholar
Brown, G. W., Andrews, B., Harris, T. O. & Adler, Z. (1986). Social support, self-esteem and depression. Psychological Medicine, 16, 813–31.Google Scholar
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. P. (1990). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Chesler, P. (1998). Women and Madness. New York: Doubleday.
Crown, S. & Lee, A. (1999). The handbook of child and adolescent clinical psychology: a contextual approach. London: Routledge.
Ehrenriech, B. & English, D. (1979). For her own good: 150 years of expert advice for women. London: Pluto Press.
Epstein, M. (1995). Thoughts without a thinker: Buddhism and psychoanalysis, Psychoanalytic Review, 82, 391–406.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and civilisation: A history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Tavistock.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jack, D. C. (1991). Silencing the self: women and depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lee, C. (1998). Women's heath: psychological and social persepctives. London: Sage.
Mauthner, N. (2000). Feeling low and feeling really bad about feeling low. Women's experience of motherhood and post-partum depression, Canadian Psychology, 40, 143–61.Google Scholar
O'Grady, H. (2004). Women's relationships with themselves: gender, Foucault, therapy. London: Routledge.
Rutter, M. & Hersov, L. (1987). Child and adolescent psychiatry: modern approaches. London: Blackwell.
Sayers, J. (1982). Biological politics: feminist and anti-feminist perspectives. London: Tavistock.
Showalter, E. (1987). The female malady: women, madness and english culture 1830–1940. London: Virago.
Stanton, A. L. & Gallant, S. (1995). The psychology of women's health. Progress and challenges in research and application. Washington, DC: Amercian Psychological Association.
Stoppard, J. (1999). Women's depression: a social constructionist account, London: Routledge.
Stoppard, J. & McMullen, L. M. (2003). Situating sadness. Women and depression in social context. New York: New York University Press.
Studd, J. (1997). Depression and the menopause, British Medical Journal, 314, 977.Google Scholar
Ussher, J. M. (1989). The psychology of the female body. Florence, KY, US: Taylor and Francis/Routledge.
Ussher, J. M. (1991). Women's madness: misogyny or mental illness?Amherst, MA, US: University of Massachusetts Press.
Ussher, J. M. (1997a). Fantasies of femininity: reframing the boundaries of sex. London: Penguin.
Ussher, J. M. (1997b). Body talk: the material and discursive regulation of sexuality, madness and reproduction. London: Routledge.
Ussher, J. M. (2006). Managing the monstrous feminine: regulating the reproductive body. London: Routledge.
Yardley, L. (1997). Material discourses in health and illness. London: Routledge.
Yodanis, C. L. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women and fear. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 655–75.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×