Architecture and health

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543579.006

Architecture and health

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2014

Angela Liegey Dougall ,

Stacie Spencer and

Edited by

John Weinman and

Angela Liegey Dougall: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Stacie Spencer: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Andrew Baum: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Susan Ayers: Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus: Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman: Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston: Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman: Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West: Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Overview

Architecture can be considered in many ways, as art or aesthetic stimuli, as an expression of societal pride or aspiration, and as a way of structuring interior and exterior spaces to facilitate their use by human occupants. This latter function of architectural design has strong but modifiable effects on social behaviour and users' mood and productivity and, to some extent, design features also affect health and wellbeing. Too often, however, these important sources of influence are ignored or not recognized, despite repeated demonstrations of these effects. While much remains to be done, research has identified several architectural features that appear to be associated with mood and health. Design characteristics or the way space is structured, presence or absence of windows and illumination all appear to affect people. For some features, the relationship to health is indirect (e.g. small, crowded work spaces may result in stress that may in turn affect health) while for other features the relationship to health is more direct (e.g. eye strain from poor lighting, illness from exposure to fumes).

The structural design or arrangement of space imposes restrictions on behaviour. Doorways determine our access to a room and room dimensions restrict the kinds of behaviours that can take place inside a room. As a result, one of the most important goals when designing a building is to match the built environment with the needs of the individuals for whom the environment is designed.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 23 - 26

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Baum, A., Aiello, J. R. & Calesnick, L. E. (1978). Crowding and personal control: social density and the development of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1000–11.Google Scholar

Baum, A. & Davis, G. E. (1980). Reducing the stress of high-density living: an architectural intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 471–81.Google Scholar

Baum, A., Harpin, R. E. & Valins, S. (1975). The role of group phenomena in the experience of crowding. Environment and Behavior, 7, 185–98.Google Scholar

Baum, A. & Koman, S. (1976). Differential response to anticipated crowding: of social density. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 526–36.Google Scholar

Baum, A. & Paulus, P. B. (1987). Crowding. In Stokols, D. & Altman, I. (Eds.). Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley.

Baum, A. & Valins, S. (1977). Architecture and social behavior: psychological studies of social density. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Baum, A. & Valins, S. (1979). Architectural mediation of residential density and control: social contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 131–75.Google Scholar

Desor, J. A. (1972). Toward a psychological theory of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 79–83.Google Scholar

Devlin, A. S. & Arneill, A. B. (2003). Health care environments and patient outcomes: A Review of the Literature. Environment and Behavior, 35, 665–94.Google Scholar

Evans, G. W., Lepore, S. J. & Schroeder, A. (1996). The role of interior design elements in human responses to crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 41–6.Google Scholar

Evans, G. W., Lercher, P. & Kofler, W. W. (2002). Crowding and children's mental health: the role of house type. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 221–31.Google Scholar

Evans, G. W., Saigert, S. & Harrid, R. (2001). Residential density and psychological health among children in low-income families. Environment and Behavior, 33, 165–80.Google Scholar

Finnegan, M. C. & Solomon, L. Z. (1981). Work attitudes in windowed vs. windowless environments. Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 291–2.Google Scholar

Fuller, T. D., Edwards, J. N., Vorakitphokatorn, S. & Sermsri, S. (1996). Chronic stress and psychological well-being: evidence from Thailand on household crowding. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 265–80.Google Scholar

Grosenick, J. K. & Hatmaker, C. M. (2000). Perceptions of the importance of physical setting in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 29–39.Google Scholar

Harris, P. B., McBride, G., Ross, C. & Curtis, L. (2002). A place to heal: environmental sources of satisfaction among hospital patients. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1276–99.Google Scholar

Heerwagen, J. H. & Orians, G. H. (1986). Adaptations to windowlessness: a study of the use of visual décor in windowed and windowless offices. Environment and Behavior, 18, 623–39.Google Scholar

Keep, P., James, J. and wellness medicine in the intensive therapy unit' 0000 Anesthesia, 35, 257–62.

Maas, J. B., Jayson, J. K. & Kleiber, D. A. (1974). Effects of spectral difference in illumination on fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 524–6.Google Scholar

Paulus, P., Cox, V., McCain, G. & Chandler, J. (1975). Some effects of crowding in a prison environment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 86–91.Google Scholar

Paulus, P., McGain, G. & Cox, V. (1978). Death rates, psychiatric commitments, blood pressure and perceived crowding as a function of institutional crowding. Environmental Psychology and Non-Verbal Behavior, 3, 107–16.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, M. A., Baum, A., Paulus, P. B. & Gaes, G. G. (1988). Architecturally mediated effects of social density in prison. Environment and Behavior, 20, 3–19.Google Scholar

Sperry, L. (1984). Health promotion and wellness medicine in the workplace: programs, promises, and problems. Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research and Practice, 40, 401–11.Google Scholar

Stokols, D. (1972). On the distinction between density and crowding; some implications for future research. Psychological Review, 79, 275–7.Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, 6, 85–125.Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–1.Google Scholar

Verderber, S. & Reuman, D. (1988). Windows, views, and health status in hospital therapeutic environments. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 4, 120–33.Google Scholar

Book contents

Architecture and health

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive