Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-4ks9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T11:48:37.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amputation and phantom limb pain

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
Ronald Melzack  and
Kartz Joel
Edited by
Susan Ayers ,
Andrew Baum ,
Chris McManus ,
Stanton Newman ,
Kenneth Wallston ,
John Weinman  and
Robert West
Ronald Melzack
Affiliation:
McGill University
Kartz Joel
Affiliation:
York University
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Phantom limbs occur in 95–100% of amputees who lose an arm or leg. The phantom limb is usually described as having a tingling feeling and a definite shape that resembles the somatosensory experience of the real limb before amputation. It is reported to move through space in much the same way as the normal limb would move when the person walks, sits down, or stretches out on a bed. At first, the phantom limb feels perfectly normal in size and shape, so much so that the amputee may reach out for objects with the phantom hand, or try to step on to the floor with the phantom leg. As time passes, however, the phantom limb begins to change shape. The arm or leg becomes less distinct and may fade away altogether, so that the phantom hand or foot seems to be hanging in mid-air. Sometimes, the limb is slowly ‘telescoped’ into the stump until only the hand or foot remain at the stump tip (Solonen, 1962). However, the neural basis of the phantom does not disappear. Injury of the stump years or decades after fading or telescoping may suddenly produce a phantom as vivid and full-sized as that felt immediately after amputation (Cohen, 1944).

Amputation is not essential for the occurrence of a phantom. After avulsion of the brachial plexus of the arm, without injury to the arm itself, most patients report a phantom arm (the ‘third arm’) which is usually extremely painful (Wynn-Parry, 1980).

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 548 - 550
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bors, E. (1951). Phantom limbs of patients with spinal cord injury. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 66, 610–31.Google Scholar
Bromage, P. R. & Melzack, R. (1974). Phantom limbs and the body schema. Canadian Anesthetists' Society Journal, 21, 267–74.Google Scholar
Brugger, P. & Regard, T. (1997). Illusory reduplication of one's own body: phenomenology and classification of autoscopic phenomena. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 2, 19–38.Google Scholar
Burke, D. C. & Woodward, J. M. (1976). Pain and phantom sensation in spinal paralysis. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 26, 489–99.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1944). The mechanism of visceral pain. Transactions of the Medical Society of London, 64, 65–99.Google Scholar
Conomy, J. P. (1973). Disorders of body image after spinal cord injury. Neurology, 23, 842–50.Google Scholar
Denny-Brown, D., Meyer, J. S. & Horenstein, S. (1952). The significance of perceptual rivalry resulting from parietal lesion. Brain, 75, 433–71.Google Scholar
Dorpat, T. L. (1971). Phantom sensations of internal organs. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 12, 27–35.Google Scholar
Heusner, A. P. (1950). Phantom genitalia. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 75, 128–31.Google Scholar
Ingvar, M. & Hsieh, J. C. (1999). The image of pain. In: Wall, P. D. & Melzack, R. (Eds.). Textbook of Pain (4th edn.) (pp. 215–33). Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone.
Jankovic, J. & Glass, J. P. (1985). Metoclopramide-induced phantom dyskinesia. Neurology, 35, 432–5.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. S. & Nikolajsen, L. (1999). Phantom pain and other phenomena after amputation. In Wall, P. D. and Melzack, R. (Eds.). Textbook of Pain (4th edn.). (pp. 799–814). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Kallio, K. E. (1950). Phantom limb of forearm stump cleft by kineplastic surgery. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, 99, 121–32.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Melzack, R. (1990). Pain ‘memories’ in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. Pain, 43, 319–26.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Melzack, R. (2003). Phantom limb pain. In: Grafman, J. & Robertson, I. H. (Eds.). Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 205–30). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Krebs, B., Jensen, T. S., Kroner, K., Nielsen, J. & Jorgensen, H. S. (1985). Phantom limb phenomena in amputees seven years after limb amputation. In Fields, H. L., Dubner, R. & Cervero, F. (Eds.). Advances in pain research and therapy, (Vol. 9) (pp. 425–9). New York: Raven Press.
Kroner, K., Krebs, B., Skov, J. & Jorgensen, H. S. (1989). Immediate and long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-mastectomy breast pain. Pain, 36, 327–34.Google Scholar
Lacroix, R., Melzack, R., Smith, D. & Mitchell, N. (1992). Multiple phantom limbs in a child. Cortex, 28, 503–7.Google Scholar
McKenna, J. E. & Melzack, R. (1992). Analgesia produced by lidocaine microinjection into the dentate gyrus. Pain, 49, 105–12.Google Scholar
Melzack, R. (1989). Phantom limbs, the self and the brain. Canadian Psychology, 30, 1–16.Google Scholar
Melzack, R. & Bromage, P. R. (1973). Experimental phantom limbs. Experimental Neurology, 39, 261–9.Google Scholar
Melzack, R., Israel, R., Lacroix, R. & Schultz, G. (1997). Phantom limb in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain, 120, 1603–20.Google Scholar
Melzack, R. & Loeser, J. D. (1978). Phantom body pain in paraplegics: evidence for a central ‘pattern generating mechanism’. Pain, 4, 195–210.Google Scholar
Mesulam, M. M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 19, 309–15.Google Scholar
Money, J. (1964). Phantom orgasm in the dreams of paraplegic men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 3, 373–82.Google Scholar
Poeck, K. (1964). Phantoms following amputation in early childhood and in congenital absence of limbs. Cortex, 1, 269–75.Google Scholar
Riddoch, G. (1941). Phantom limbs and body shape. Brain, 64, 197–222.Google Scholar
Saadah, E. S. M. & Melzack, R. (1994). Phantom limb experiences in congenital limb-deficient adults. Cortex, 30, 479–85.Google Scholar
Simmel, M. (1956). On phantom limbs. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 75, 69–78.Google Scholar
Solonen, K. A. (1962). The phantom phenomenon in amputated Finnish war veterans. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 54 (Suppl.), 7–37.Google Scholar
Tasker, R. A. R., Choinière, M., Libman, S. M. & Melzack, R. (1987). Analgesia produced by injection of lidocaine into the lateral hypothalamus. Pain, 31, 239–48.Google Scholar
Vaccarino, A. L. & Melzack, R. (1989). Analgesia produced by injection of lidocaine into the anterior cingulum bundle of the rat. Pain, 39, 213–19.Google Scholar
Vaccarino, A. L. & Melzack, R. (1991). The role of the cingulum bundle in self-mutilation following peripheral neurectomy in the rat. Experimental Neurology, 111, 131–4.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, A. (1969). Sexual function in paraplegia and tetraplegia. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 4, 437–65.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S., Sersen, E. A. & Vetter, R. T. (1964). Phantoms and somatic sensation in cases of congenital aplasia. Cortex, I, 276–90.Google Scholar
White, J. C. & Sweet, W. H. (1969). Pain and the neurosurgeon. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
Wynn-Parry, C. B. (1980). Pain in avulsion lesions of the brachial plexus. Pain, 9, 41–53.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×