Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:57:13.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Other Legal Decision-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2024

Edited by
Monica K. Miller ,
Logan A. Yelderman ,
Matthew T. Huss  and
Jason A. Cantone
Monica K. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Logan A. Yelderman
Affiliation:
Prairie View A & M University, Texas
Matthew T. Huss
Affiliation:
Creighton University, Omaha
Jason A. Cantone
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making , pp. 523 - 674
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

8 CFR § 214.14(b)(1).Google Scholar
8 CFR § 208.16.Google Scholar
8 CFR § 204.2 (c).Google Scholar
8 USC § 1101 (a).Google Scholar
8 USC § 1101(f).Google Scholar
8 USC § 1101(f).Google Scholar
8 USC § 1182(a)(1)(A)(iv).Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889.Google Scholar
Balsamo, D. N., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Competency in immigration proceedings. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 44(1), 132–134.Google Scholar
Barber-Rioja, V., Akinsulure-Smith, A. M. & Vendzules, S. (2022). Mental health evaluations in immigration court: A guide for mental health and legal professionals. NYU Press.Google Scholar
Barber-Rioja, V. & Garcia-Mansilla, A. (2019). Special considerations when conducting forensic psychological evaluations for immigration court. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(11), 2049–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22863.Google Scholar
Barber-Rioja, V. & Garcia-Mansilla, A. (2023). Forensic mental health assessment in immigration court. In DeMatteo, D. & Scherr, K. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychology and law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barber-Rioja, V., & Rosenfeld, B. (2018). Addressing linguistic and cultural differences in the forensic interview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1495280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basterra, M., Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (Eds.) (2011). Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. Routledge.Google Scholar
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Owusu Ananeh-Firempong, I. I. (2016). Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Reports, 118(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/118.4.293.Google Scholar
Boehnlein, J., Westermeyer, J., & Scalco, M. (2015). Supplementary Module 11: Immigrants and refugees. In Lewis-Fernández, R, Aggarwal, N, Hinton, L, Hinton, D., & Kirmayer, L (Eds.), DSM-5® Handbook on the Cultural Formulation Interview (pp. 173–181). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bouza, J., Camacho-Thompson, D. E., Carlo, G., et al. (2018). The science is clear: Separating families has long-term damaging psychological and health consequences for children, families, and communities. Society for Research in Child Development. www.srcd.org/.Google Scholar
Capps, R., Fix, M., & Zong, J. (2016). A profile of US children with unauthorized immigrant Parents. Migration Policy Institute. www.migrationpolicy.org/research/profile-us-children-unauthorized-immigrant-parents.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2001). Errors of recall and credibility: Can omissions and discrepancies in successive statements reasonably be said to undermine credibility of testimony? Medico-Legal Journal, 69(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1258/rsmmlj.69.1.25.Google Scholar
De Jesús-Rentas, G., Boehnlein, J., & Sparr, L. (2010). Central American victims of gang violence as asylum seekers: The role of the forensic expert. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(4), 490–498.Google Scholar
Department of Justice (2012). FY 2021. Statistical Yearbook. www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2021.Google Scholar
Department of Justice (2018). FY 2018. Statistical Yearbook. Retrieved from www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2018.Google Scholar
Dusky v. United States, 362 US 402 (1960).Google Scholar
Evans III, F. B., & Hass, A. G. (2018). Forensic psychological assessment in immigration court: A guidebook for evidence-based and ethical practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Executive Office of Immigration Review (2013). Phase 1 Guidance. Department of Justice,Washington, DC. http://immigrationreports.files.wordpress.com/.Google Scholar
Filone, S., & DeMatteo, D. (2017). Testimonial inconsistencies, adverse credibility determinations, and asylum adjudication in the United States. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000112.Google Scholar
Filone, S., & King, C. M. (2015). The emerging standard of competence in immigration removal proceedings: A review for forensic mental health professionals. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000032.Google Scholar
Frederick, L. T. L., Lui, P., & Kalibatseva, Z. (2020). Multicultural issues in psychological assessment. In Selbom, M. & Suhr, J. A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of clinical assessment and diagnosis (pp. 25–37). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frumkin, I. B., & Friedland, J. (1995). Forensic evaluations in immigration cases: Evolving issues. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13(4), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370130404.Google Scholar
Galatzer-Levy, I. R., & Bryant, R. A. (2013). 636,120 ways to have posttraumatic stress disorder. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504115.Google Scholar
Hake, B. A., & Banks, D. L. (2005). The Hake hardship scale: A quantitative system for assessment of hardship in immigration cases based on a statistical analysis of AAO decisions. Bender’s Immigration Bulletin, 10, 403–420.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.Google Scholar
Herlihy, J., Scragg, P., & Turner, S. (2002). Discrepancies in autobiographical memories – Implications for the assessment of asylum seekers: Repeated interviews study. British Medical Journal, 324(7333), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7333.324.Google Scholar
Hinton, D. E., & Lewis‐Fernández, R. (2011). The cross-cultural validity of posttraumatic stress disorder: Implications for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28(9), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20753.Google Scholar
INA § 212(h).Google Scholar
INA § 240A(b)(1).Google Scholar
In re M-A-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 474 (B. I. A. 2011).Google Scholar
Kagan, M. (2002). Is truth in the eye of the beholder-objective credibility assessment in refugee status determination. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 17(3), 367–415.Google Scholar
Kissane, M., Szymanski, L., Upthegrove, R., & Katona, C. (2014). Complex posttraumatic stress disorder in traumatised asylum seekers: A pilot study. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 28(3), 137–144. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0213-61632014000300001.Google Scholar
Koch, W. K., Nader, R., & Harring, (2009). The science and pseudoscience of assessing psychological injuries. In Skeem, J., Douglas, K., & Lilienfeld, S. (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Controversies and consensus (pp. 263–283). Guilford.Google Scholar
Lopez, S. R., & Guarnaccia, P. J. (2000). Cultural psychopathology: Uncovering the social world of mental illness. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.571.Google Scholar
Lustig, S. L., Kureshi, S., Delucchi, K. L., Iacopino, V., & Morse, S. C. (2008). Asylum grant rates following medical evaluations of maltreatment among political asylum applicants in the United States. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 10(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-007-9056-8.Google Scholar
Matter of Castro-Tum, 27 I&N Dec. 271 (A.G. 2018).Google Scholar
Matter of M-A-M, 25 I&N Dec. (BIA 2011).Google Scholar
Matter of Ngai, 19 I&N Dec. 245, BIA 1984.Google Scholar
Matto, M., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2019). A systematic approach to the detection of false PTSD. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 47(3), 325–334.Google Scholar
Marouf, F. E. (2014). Incompetent but deportable: The case for a right to mental competence in removal proceedings. Hastings Law Journal, 65(4), 929–998.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G. et al. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Musalo, K., Meffert, S. M., & Abdo, A. O. (2010). The role of mental health professionals in political asylum processing. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 38(4), 479–489.Google Scholar
Neuman, G. L. (2005). Discretionary deportation. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20(4), 611–655.Google Scholar
New York Immigrant Representation Study (2011). Accessing Justice, The Availability and Adequacy of Counsel in Immigration Proceedings. https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/109/.Google Scholar
Niang v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 505, 512 (4th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2020). Key Findings About US Immigrants. www.pewresearch.org/.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. R. & Suzuki, L. A. (2013). Bias in psychological assessment: An empirical review and recommendations. In Graham, J. R., Naglieri, J. A., & Weiner, I. B (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (pp. 82–113). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Soto, A., Bottone, R., Waters, J., et al. (2021). Charting a new regional course of action: The complex motivations and costs of Central American Migration. Migration Policy Institute. www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/mpi-wfp-mit_migration-motivations-costs_exec-sum-eng_final.pdf.Google Scholar
USCIS Policy Manual Vol. 1 Part E Ch. 8 (2021). Discretionary analysis, US Citizenship and Immigration Services. www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-1-part-e-chapter-8#:~:text=The%20discretionary%20analysis%20involves%20the,reliance%20on%20biases%20or%20assumptions.Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office (2016). Asylum: Variation exists in outcomes of applications across immigration courts and judges. www.gao.gov/products/gao-17-72#:~:text=After%20statistically%20controlling%20for%20certain,across%20immigration%20courts%20and%20judges.Google Scholar
Vallières, F., Ceannt, R., Daccache, F., et al. (2018). ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD amongst Syrian refugees in Lebanon: The factor structure and the clinical utility of the International Trauma Questionnaire. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 138(6), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12973.Google Scholar
Varela, J. G., Boccaccini, M. T., Gonzalez, J. E., Gharagozioo, L., & Johnson, S. M. (2011). Do defense attorney referrals for competence to stand trial evaluations depend on whether the client speaks English or Spanish? Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9253-1.Google Scholar
Wilson, A., Prokop, N. H. & Robins, S. (2015) Addressing all heads of the hydra: Reframing safeguards for mentally impaired detainees in immigration removal proceedings. New York Review of Law & Social Change, 39(2), 313–368.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision). https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en.Google Scholar

References

Beltrani, A., Reed, A. L., Zapf, P. A., & Otto, R. K. O. (2018). Is hindsight really 20/20? The impact of outcome information on decision making. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1505790.Google Scholar
Brady, K. T., Back, S. E., & Coffey, S. F. (2004). Substance abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(5), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00309.x.Google Scholar
Brown, L. B. (2020). Complex trauma and the question of reasonableness of response in sexual harassment cases: Issues for treatment providers and forensic evaluators. Psychological Injury and Law, 13, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09378-7.Google Scholar
Bucich, M., Steel, Z., & Berle, D. (2022). Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom profiles among people who have experienced abuse: Findings from the NESARC-III study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001193.Google Scholar
Fokas, K. F., & Brovko, J. M. (2020). Assessing symptom validity in psychological injury evaluations using the MMPI-2-RF and the PAI: An updated review. Psychological Injury and Law, 13, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09393-8.Google Scholar
Foote, W. E. (2007). Psychological evaluation and testimony in cases of clergy and teacher sex abuse. In Goldstein, A. M. (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Advanced topics for forensic mental experts & attorneys (pp. 571–604). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Foote, W. E. (2020). Trauma assessment in personal injury and employment discrimination cases. In Rafael, A. J., Owen, E., & Maddox, J. (Eds.), Trauma and its vicissitudes in forensic contexts: An introduction (pp. 297–324). Springer.Google Scholar
Foote, W. E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2021). Understanding sexual harassment: Evidence-based forensic practice. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Foote, W. E., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Young, C. (2021). Civil forensic evaluation: Professional and ethical considerations in litigation related assessment. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(4), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09398-3.Google Scholar
Foote, W. E., & Lareau, C. R. (2013). Psychological evaluation of emotional damages in tort cases. In Otto, R. K. & Weiner, I. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology Vol. 1: Forensic psychology (pp. 172–200). John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Greenberg, S. A., Otto, R. K., & Long, A. C. (2003). The utility of psychological testing in assessing emotional damages in personal injury litigation. Assessment, 10(4), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103259532.Google Scholar
Gutheil, T. G., Bursztajn, H., Brodsky, A., & Strasburger, L. H. (2000). Preventing “critogenic” harms: Minimizing emotional injury from civil litigation. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 28(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318530002800102.Google Scholar
Hagenaars, M. (2016). Tonic immobility and PTSD in a large community sample. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 7(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.051915.Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Comparing victim attributions and outcomes for workplace aggression and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020070.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., et al. (2017). Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8 (Suppl. 5), 1353383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1353383.Google Scholar
Liebman, R. E., Van Buren, B., & Grasso, D. (2022). Assessment and clinical decision-making with adult survivors of interpersonal violence. In Geffner, R., White, J. W., Hamberger, L. K., et al. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan (pp. 4351–4382). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_175-1.Google Scholar
Lucassen, N., de Haan, A. D., Helmerhorst, K. O. W., & Keizer, R. (2021). Interrelated changes in parental stress, parenting, and coparenting across the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Psychology. https://doi-org.libproxy.unm.edu/10.1037/fam0000908.supp (Supplemental).Google Scholar
Marino, V. R., Badana, A. N. S., & Haley, W. E. (2020). Care demands and well-being of primary and secondary non-spousal caregivers of aging adults. Clinical Gerontologist: The Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 43(5), 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2020.1759748.Google Scholar
McCaslin, S. E., Cloitre, M., Neylan, T. C., et al. (2019). Factors associated with high functioning despite distress in post-9/11 veterans. Rehabilitation Psychology, 64(3), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000271.Google Scholar
Messman, B. A., Rafiuddin, H. S., Slavish, D. C., Weiss, N. H., & Contractor, A. A. (2022). Examination of daily-level associations between posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and COVID-19 worries. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(3), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001170.Google Scholar
Neal, T. M. S., Lienert, P., Denne, E., & Singh, J. P. (2022). A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health. Law and Human Behavior, 46(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000482.Google Scholar
Pietrzak, R. H., Feder, A., Singh, R., et al. (2014). Trajectories of PTSD risk and resilience in World Trade Center responders: An 8-year prospective cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713000597.Google Scholar
Renka, C. (2007). The presumed eggshell plaintiff rule: Determining liability when mental harm accompanies physical injury. Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 29, 289–311.Google Scholar
Rodriguez v Bethlehem Steel Corporation et al., 12 Cal.3d 382, 115 Cal. Rptr. 765, 525 P.2d 669 (1974). https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/12/382.html.Google Scholar
Schiewe, M. (2019). Tonic immobility: The fear-freeze response as a forgotten factor in sexual assault laws. DePaul Journal of Women, Gender and Law, 8, 1–28.Google Scholar
Simon, D., Ahn, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Read, S. J. (2020). The adversarial mindset. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(3), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000226.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. P., & Moran, T. A. (2004). Forensic/clinical assessment of psychological trauma and PTSD in legal settings. In Wilson, J. P. & Keane, T. M. (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 603–636). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

References

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x.Google Scholar
Agnew, R., Piquero, N. L., & Cullen, F. T. (2009). General Strain Theory and white-collar crime. In Simpson, S. S & Weisburd, D (Eds.) The criminology of white-collar crime (pp. 35–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09502-8_3.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00270.x.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In Smith, K. G. & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P., & Klein, U. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology, 55(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00226.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummelman, E., Thomaes, S., Nelemans, S. A., et al. (2015). Origins of narcissism in children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(12), 3659–3662. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420870112.Google Scholar
Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. D., & Dunaway, R. G. (1994). Reconsidering strain theory: Operationalization, rival theories, and adult criminality. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(3), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02221211.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J., Bonacci, A. M., van Dijk, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Narcissism, sexual refusal, and aggression: Testing a narcissistic reactance model of sexual coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1027.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04.Google Scholar
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2015). The privileged defense: Affluenza’s potential impact on counselors in court proceedings. VISTAS Online. www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/vistas/article_7317cd23f16116603abcacff0000bee5e7.pdf?sfvrsn=4.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589.Google Scholar
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: Study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.Google Scholar
Czibor, A., & Bereczkei, T. (2012). Machiavellian people’s success results from monitoring their partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.005.Google Scholar
DeShong, H. L., Grant, D. M., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2015). Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The five-factor model and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.001.Google Scholar
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374.Google Scholar
Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.11.Google Scholar
Galvin, M. A., Logan, M., & Snook, D. W. (2021). Assessing the validity of white-collar crime definitions using experimental survey data. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(1), 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09455-6.Google Scholar
Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., et al. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 261–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038231.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C., & Denniss, R. (2005). Affluenza: When too much is never enough (Illustrated ed.). Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854896023001004.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903.Google Scholar
Hystad, S. W., Mearns, K. J., & Eid, J. (2014). Moral disengagement as a mechanism between perceptions of organisational injustice and deviant work behaviours. Safety Science, 68, 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.012.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G., Belschak, F. D., & den Hartog, D. N. (2014). (Un)Ethical behavior and performance appraisal: The role of affect, support, and organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1687-1.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N. (2014a). Predatory personalities as behavioral mimics and parasites. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614535936.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N. (2014b). Risk in the face of retribution: Psychopathic individuals persist in financial misbehavior among the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.030.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N., & Mueller, S. M. (2021). Is Machiavellianism dead or dormant? The perils of researching a secretive construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 176, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04708-w.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139.Google Scholar
Kaseem, R., & Higson, A. W. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.Google Scholar
Klein, G., & Shtudiner, Z. (2020). Judging severity of unethical workplace behavior: Attractiveness and gender as status characteristics. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420916100.Google Scholar
Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. (2017). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems. In Lewin, G. (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (pp. 201–216). Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lingnau, V., Fuchs, F., & Dehne-Niemann, T. E. (2017). The influence of psychopathic traits on the acceptance of white-collar crime: Do corporate psychopaths cook the books and misuse the news? Journal of Business Economics, 87(9), 1193–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0864-6.Google Scholar
Listwan, S. J., Piquero, N. L., & van Voorhis, P. (2010). Recidivism among a white-collar sample: Does personality matter? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.43.1.156.Google Scholar
Marks, J. (2012, October). The mind behind the fraudsters crime: Key behavioral and environmental elements. ACFE Global Fraud Conference, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Međedović, J. (2017). The profile of a criminal offender depicted by HEXACO personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.015.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). Supplemental material for a meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679.supp.Google Scholar
Patrice, J. (2014, August 6). The affluenza kid and privilege (this time the evidentiary kind). Above the Law. https://abovethelaw.com/2014/08/the-affluenza-kid-and-privilege-this-time-the-evidentiary-kind/.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6.Google Scholar
Piquero, N. L., Exum, M. L., & Simpson, S. S. (2005). Integrating the desire-for-control and rational choice in a corporate crime context. Justice Quarterly, 22(2), 252–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500089034.Google Scholar
Piquero, N. L., Piquero, A. R., Narvey, C., Boutwell, B., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Are there psychopaths in white-collar jobs? Deviant Behavior, 42(8), 979–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1708537.Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2020). PWC’s Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2020. PwC. www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/forensics/economic-crime-survey.html.Google Scholar
Ragatz, L. L., Fremouw, W., & Baker, E. (2012). The psychological profile of white-collar offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 978–997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812437846.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (1966) Relative deprivation and social justice. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schoepfer, A., Piquero, N. L., & Langton, L. (2013). Low self-control versus the desire-for-control: An empirical test of white-collar crime and conventional crime. Deviant Behavior, 35(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.834758.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832Google Scholar
Simpson, S. S. (2013). White-collar crime: A review of recent developments and promising directions for future research. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145546.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (1939). White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083937.Google Scholar
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195.Google Scholar
Threadgold, S., & Nilan, P. (2009). Reflexivity of contemporary youth, risk and cultural capital. Current Sociology, 57(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108097452.Google Scholar
Turner, M. J. (2014). An investigation of Big Five personality and propensity to commit white-collar crime. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 17, 57–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1475-148820140000017002.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007.Google Scholar
Webber, C. (2007). Revaluating relative deprivation theory. Theoretical Criminology, 11(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480607072737.Google Scholar
Williams, K. M., & Paulhus, D. L. (2004). Factor structure of the self-report psychopathy scale (SRP-II) in non-forensic samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.004.Google Scholar
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. CPA Journal, 38–42.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Kong, D. (2020). Employee treatment and corporate fraud. Economic Modelling, 85, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.10.028.Google Scholar

References

Administrative Office of the US Courts (2021). US district courts – Judicial business 2020. www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/us-district-courts-judicial-business-2020.Google Scholar
Albiston, C., Edelman, L. B., & Milligan, J. (2014). The dispute tree and the legal forest. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826.Google Scholar
Alicke, M. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556.Google Scholar
Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Intentional harms are worse, even when they’re not. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480507.Google Scholar
Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference points and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1070.Google Scholar
Bavli, H. J., & Mozer, R. (2019). The effects of comparable-case guidance on awards for pain and suffering and punitive damages: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Yale Law & Policy Review, 37, 405–458.Google Scholar
Bovbjerg, R. R., Sloan, F. A., & Blumstein, J. F. (1989). Valuing life and limb in tort: Scheduling pain and suffering. Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 908–976.Google Scholar
Burch, E. C. (2019). Mass tort deals: Backroom bargaining in multidistrict litigation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burch, E. C., & Williams, M. S. (2022). Perceptions of justice in multidistrict litigation: Voices from the crowd. Cornell Law Review, 107(7), 1835–1925.Google Scholar
Bystranowski, P., Bartosz, J., Próchnicki, , & Skórska, P. (2021). Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000438.Google Scholar
Cantone, J. A. (2020). Counterfactual thinking, causation, and covariation in mock juror assessments of negligence: Twenty-five years later. Psychological Reports, 123, 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118816945.Google Scholar
Cecil, J. S., Rindskopf, D., Eyre, R. N., & Miletich, D. (2007). A quarter-century of summary judgment practice in six federal district courts, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 861–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00109.x.Google Scholar
Chua, L. J. & Engel, D. M. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717.Google Scholar
Coates, D., & Penrod, S. (1980–1981). Social psychology and the emergence of disputes. Law & Society Review, 15, 655–680. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053506.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. R. (1999). Advising clients to apologize. Southern California Law Review, 72, 1009–1069. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/648.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. R. (2005). The culture of legal denial. Nebraska Law Review, 84, 247–312. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/39.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. H. (2009). Tort bench and jury trials in state courts, 2005. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. H., & Harbacek, K. (2011). Punitive damage awards in state courts, 2005. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Court Statistics Project (2020). State Court Caseload Digest: 2018 Data. National Center for State Courts. www.courtstatistics.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/40820/2018-Digest.pdf.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens’ sense of justice and the legal system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00103.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., & Huff, C. W. (1990). Heightened damage assessment as a result of the intentionality of the damage-causing act. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00898.x.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M. & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T., Heise, M., Waters, N. L., & Wells, M. T. (2010). The decision to award punitive damages: An empirical study. Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(2), 577–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/2.2.577.Google Scholar
Engel, D. M. (2016). The myth of the litigious society: Why we don’t sue. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980–1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming … Law & Society Review, 15, 631–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. (1984). Worlds of deals: Using negotiation to teach about legal process. Journal of Legal Education, 34, 268–276. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42892685.Google Scholar
Goodman-Delahunty, J., Granhag, P. A., Hartwig, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2010). Insightful or wishful: Lawyers’ ability to predict case outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019060.Google Scholar
Greene, E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10464-000.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C. (2000). Framing frivolous litigation: A psychological theory. University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 163–216. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600328.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2007). Blinking on the bench: How judges decide cases. Cornell Law Review, 93, 1–43. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/917.Google Scholar
Hadfield, G. K. (2008). Framing the choice between cash and the courthouse: Experiences with the 9/11 compensation fund. Law and Society Review, 42, 645–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00354.x.Google Scholar
Hannaford-Agor, P., Graves, S., & Miller, S. (2015). The landscape of civil litigation in state courts. National Center for State Courts. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2700745.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P. (2000). Business on trial: The civil jury and corporate responsibility. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., Helm, R. K., & Reyna, V. F. (2018). From meaning to money: Translating injury into dollars. Law and Human Behavior, 42, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000282.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., Reed, K. M., Reyna, V. R., Garavito, D., & Helm, R. K. (2022). Guiding jurors’ damage award decisions: Experimental investigations of approaches based on theory and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(2), 188–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000342.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2011). To dollars from sense: Qualitative to quantitative translation in jury damage awards. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 120–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01233.x.Google Scholar
Helm, R. K., Hans, V. P., Reyna, V. R., & Reed, K. (2020). Numeracy in the jury box: Numerical ability, meaning, and damage award decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3629.Google Scholar
Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2012). An intentionality bias in social judgment: Its precursors and consequences. Paper presented at the 24th annual convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Hyman, D. (2006). Rescue without law: An empirical perspective on the duty to rescue. Texas Law Review, 84, 653–737.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., & Braman, D. (2009). Whose eyes are you going to believe? Scott v. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review, 122, 837–906. https://harvardlawreview.org/2009/04/whose-eyes-are-you-going-to-believe-scott-v-harris-and-the-perils-of-cognitive-illiberalism/.Google Scholar
Kamin, K. A. & Rachlinski, J. J. (1995). Ex post ≠ ex ante: Determining liability in hindsight. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499075.Google Scholar
Karlovac, M. & Darley, J. M. (1988). Attribution of responsibility for accidents: A negligence law analogy. Social Cognition, 6, 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1988.6.4.287.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R., & Guthrie, C. (1994). Psychological barriers to litigation settlement: An experimental approach. Michigan Law Review, 93, 107–192. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol93/iss1/3.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. (1997). Contingency fee lawyers as gatekeepers in the civil justice system. Judicature, 81, 22–29.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. (2007). Defending torts: What should we know? Journal of Tort Law, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-9148.1047.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. (2011). The antecedents of disputes: Complaining and claiming. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/6.Google Scholar
MacCoun, R. (1996). Differential treatment of corporate defendants by juries: An examination of the deep-pockets hypothesis. Law & Society Review, 30, 121–161.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1314.Google Scholar
Miller, R. E., & Sarat, A. (1981). Grievances, claims, and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture. Law and Society Review, 15, 525–566. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053502.Google Scholar
Mott, N. L., Hans, V. P., & Simpson, L. (2000). What’s half a lung worth? Civil jurors’ accounts of their award decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005540229224.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. J. & Spier, K. E. (2016). A comprehensive theory of civil settlement. NYU Law Review, 91, 59–143. www.nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-91-number-1/a-comprehensive-theory-of-civil-settlement/.Google Scholar
Rachlinski, J. J. (1996). Gains, losses and the psychology of litigation. Southern California Law Review, 70, 113–186. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/795.Google Scholar
Rachlinski, J. J. (2003). Misunderstanding ability, misallocating responsibility. Brooklyn Law Review, 68, 1055–1092. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol68/iss4/.Google Scholar
Rahmati, M., Hyman, D. A., Black, B., Liu, J., & Silver, S. (2018). Screening plaintiffs and selecting defendants in medical malpractice litigation: Evidence from Illinois and Indiana. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 15, 41–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12173.Google Scholar
Reed, K., Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2019). Accounting for awards: An examination of juror reasoning behind pain and suffering damage award decisions. Denver Law Review, 96, 841–867.Google Scholar
Relis, T. (2009). Perceptions in litigation and mediation: Lawyers, defendants, plaintiffs, and gendered parties. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Physical and Emotional Harms (2010). American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2000). Outcome severity and judgments of “responsibility”: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2575–2609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02451.x.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement. Michigan Law Review, 102, 460–516.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2006). Apologies and settlement levers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 3(2), 333–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00072.x.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2008). Attorneys, apologies, and settlement negotiation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13, 349–398.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2014). Litigation and settlement. In Zamir, E. & Teichman, D. (Eds.), Handbook on behavioral economics and the law (pp. 623–642). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K., & Eisenberg, T. (2017). Juries compared with what? The need for a baseline and attention to real-world complexity. In Kovera, M. B. (Ed.), The psychology of juries (pp. 109–129). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000026-006.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K., & Hans, V. P. (2016). The psychology of tort law. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. & Sternlight, J. R. (2021). Psychology for lawyers: Understanding the human factors in negotiation, litigation, and decision making (2nd ed.). American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Saks, M. J. (1992). Do we really know anything about the behavior of the tort litigation system – and why not? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 1147–1292. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312403.Google Scholar
Saks, M. J., Hollinger, L. A., Wissler, R. L., Evans, D. L., & Hart, A. J. (1997). Reducing variability in civil jury awards. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834614312.Google Scholar
Sanders, J., Kugler, M. B., Solan, L. M., & Darley, J. M. (2014). Must torts be wrongs? An empirical perspective. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 1–45.Google Scholar
Scott v. Harris, 550 US 372 (2007).Google Scholar
Sevier, J. (2017). Vicarious windfalls. Iowa Law Review, 102, 651–707. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-102-issue-2/vicarious-windfalls/.Google Scholar
Tobia, K. P. (2018). How people judge what is reasonable. Alabama Law Review, 70, 293–359. www.law.ua.edu/lawreview/files/2018/12/1-Tobia-293-359.pdf.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2015). The psychology of aggregation: Promise and potential pitfalls. DePaul Law Review, 64, 711–736. https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol64/iss2/20/.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N. & Schuller, R. A. (1987). Individual differences and the pursuit of legal rights: A preliminary inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044743.Google Scholar
Wiener, R. L., Gaborit, M., Pritchard, C. C., et al. (1994). Counterfactual thinking in mock juror assessments of negligence: A preliminary investigation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370120108.Google Scholar
Wilking, E. (2022). Independent contractors in law and in fact: Evidence from US tax returns. Northwestern University Law Review, 117(3), 731–820.Google Scholar
Williams, M. S., & Cantone, J. A. (2020). An empirical evaluation of proposed civil rules for multidistrict litigation. Georgia Law Review, 55, 221–286. www.georgialawreview.org/article/18635-an-empirical-evaluation-of-proposed-civil-rules-for-multidistrict-litigation.Google Scholar
Witman, A. B., Park, D. M., & Hardin, S. B. (1996). How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes? Archives of Internal Medicine, 156, 2565–2569. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440210083008.Google Scholar

References

Adoption and Safe Families Act, P. L. 105–89 (1997).Google Scholar
Ballou, M., Barry, J., Billingham, K., et al. (2001). Psychological model for judicial decision making in emergency or temporary child placement. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(4), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.71.4.416.Google Scholar
Brady v. United States, 397 US 742 (1970).Google Scholar
Brank, E. M., Williams, A. L., Weisz, V., & Ray, R. E. (2001). Parental compliance: Its role in termination of parental rights cases. Nebraska Law Review, 80, 335.Google Scholar
Britner, P. A., & Mossler, D. G. (2002). Professionals’ decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00311-3.Google Scholar
Buffington, K., Dierkhising, C. B., & Marsh, S. C. (2010). Ten things every juvenile court judge should know about trauma and delinquency. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 61(3), 13–23.Google Scholar
Cabell, J. J., & Marsh, S. C. (2020). Swing and a miss: Reflections on the “voluntariness” of pleas in juvenile court. Children and Youth Services Review, 117, Article 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105300.Google Scholar
Children’s Bureau. (2021). The AFCARS report: Preliminary FY 2020 estimates as of October 4, 2021, No 28. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
Czaja, A. S. (2016). Children are not just little adults … Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 17(2), 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000597.Google Scholar
Dierkhising, C. B., Ko, S. J., Woods-Jaeger, B., et al. (2013). Trauma histories among justice-involved youth: Findings from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4, Article 20274. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20274.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J. & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412.Google Scholar
Doyle, Jr., J. J. (2007). Child protection and child outcomes: Measuring the effects of foster care. The American Economic Review, 97(5), 1583–1610. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1583.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. & Miller, M. K. (2019). An assessment of judges’ self‐reported experiences of secondary traumatic stress. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 70(2), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12134.Google Scholar
Edwards, L. P. (1992). The juvenile court and the role of the juvenile court judge. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 43(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.1992.tb00721.x.Google Scholar
Edwards, L. P. (2005). The role of the juvenile court judge revisited. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 56(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2005.tb00101.x.Google Scholar
Feld, B. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. NYU Press.Google Scholar
Felthous, A. R. (2011). Commentary: Competence to stand trial in juveniles and the judgment model. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39(3), 327–331.Google Scholar
Festinger, T., & Pratt, R. (2002). Speeding adoptions: An evaluation of the effects of judicial continuity. Social Work Research, 26(4), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/26.4.217.Google Scholar
Fraidin, M. I. (2013). Decision-making in dependency court: Heuristics, cognitive biases, and accountability. Cleveland State Law Review, 60, 913–974. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2358602.Google Scholar
Gatowski, S., Miller, N., Rubin, S., Escher, P., & Maze, C. (2016). Enhanced resource guidelines: Improving court practice in child abuse and neglect cases. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, C., & Summers, A. (2014). Assessing the long-term effects of courts catalyzing change preliminary protective hearing benchcard. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J., (2007). Blinking on the bench: How judges decide cases. Cornell Law Review, 93, 1-44.Google Scholar
Hahn, R., McGowan, A., Liberman, A., et al. (2007). Effects on violence of laws and policies facilitating the transfer of youth from the juvenile to the adult justice system: A report on recommendations of the task force on community preventive services. MMWR, Recommendations and Reports, 56(9), 1–11.Google Scholar
Hockenberry, S., & Puzzanchera, C. (2020). Juvenile court statistics 2018. National Center for Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., et al. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8.Google Scholar
Hielbrun, K., DeMatteo, D., & Goldstein, N. (2014). APA Handbook of psychology and juvenile justice. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
James v. Supreme Court, 77 Cal.App.3d 169 (1978).Google Scholar
Karatekin, C., Gehrman, R., & Lawler, J. (2014). A study of maltreated children and their families in juvenile court. III. Case Plans. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 65(3–4), 47–66.Google Scholar
Kerig, P. (2018). Polyvictimization and girls’ involvement in the juvenile justice system: Investigating gender-differentiated patterns of risk, recidivism, and resilience. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(5), 789–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517744843.Google Scholar
Knoche, V., Marsh, S. C., & Skinner-Ling, T. (2022). Exploring juvenile court outcomes as a function of judge-youth characteristics and interactions. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 73(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12213.Google Scholar
Lam, C. M. (2012). Prosocial involvement as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. The Scientific World Journal, Article ID# 769158. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/769158.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. E., Landsverk, J., Ellis-Macleod, E., et al. (2004). Race, ethnicity, and case outcomes in child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 447–461. www.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.02.002.Google Scholar
Lund, T. R., & Renne, J. (2009). Child safety: A guide for judges and attorneys. American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Macgill, S., & Summers, A. (2014). Assessing the relationship between the quality of juvenile dependency hearings and foster care placements. Family Court Review, 52(4), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12120.Google Scholar
Marsh, S. C., & Byer, J. (2013). Toward a conceptual framework for trauma-responsive practice in courts. Criminal Law Practitioner, 1(1), 101–103.Google Scholar
May, J. G., (2015). Decision-making processes of judges in family court: An investigation of salient features relating to termination of parental rights hearings. Doctoral dissertation. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3141.Google Scholar
McGaha, A., Otto, R. K., McClaren, M. D., & Petrila, J. (2001). Juveniles adjudicated incompetent to proceed: A descriptive study of Florida’s competence restoration program. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 427–437.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S., McWey, L. M., McKendrick, W., & Henderson, T. L. (2010). Substance using parents, foster care, and termination of parental rights: The importance of risk factors for legal outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(5), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.12.011.Google Scholar
Miller, M. K., Reichert, J., Bornstein, B. H., & Shulman, G. (2018). Judicial stress: The roles of gender and social support. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 25(4), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1469436.Google Scholar
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges [NCJFCJ]. (2011). Right from the start: The CCC preliminary protective hearing benchcard study report. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. (2018). Enhanced juvenile justice guidelines: Improving court practice in juvenile justice cases. www.ncjfcj.org/publications/enhanced-juvenile-justice-guidelines/.Google Scholar
Nolan, M. (2015). Extralegal factors important to judges’ decisions in child abuse custody cases. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/1203.Google Scholar
Puzzanchera, C., Adams, B., & Sickmund, M. (2011). Juvenile Court Statistics 2008. National Center for Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
Redding, R., & Frost, L. (2001). Adjudicative competence in the modern juvenile court. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 9, 353–410. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/law_articles/636.Google Scholar
Redlich, A. D., Zottoli, T., & Daftary-Kapur, T. (2019). Juvenile justice and plea bargaining. In Edkins, V. A., & Redlich, A. D. (Eds.). A system of pleas: Social science’s contributions to the real legal system (pp. 107–131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190689247.003.0007.Google Scholar
Rovner, J. (2016). How tough on crime became tough on kids: Prosecuting teenage drug charges in adult court. The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Russell, J., & Summers, A. (2013). Reflective decision-making and foster care placements. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031582.Google Scholar
Ryon, S. B., Early, K. W., Hand, G. & Chapman, S. (2013). Juvenile justice interventions: System escalation and effective alternatives to residential placement. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52(5), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2013.801385.Google Scholar
Sankaran, V., Church, C., & Mitchell, M. (2019). A cure worse than the disease? The impact of removal on children and their families. Marquette Law Review, 102(4), 1161–1194.Google Scholar
Sicafuse, L. L., Wood, S. M., Summers, A., & DeVault, A. (2015). Evaluating the child abuse and neglect institute: Does training affect decision-making? Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 66(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12023.Google Scholar
Siegel, G., & Hurst, H. (2020). An initial study of the second judicial district court’s (Washoe County, NV) Project ONE Program. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
Summers, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship between hearing quality and case outcomes in New York. New York State Unified Court System Child Welfare Improvement Project.Google Scholar
Summers, A., & Gatowski, S. (2018). Nevada hearing quality study: Examining the quality of child welfare court hearing practice in Nevada. Administrative Office of the Courts, Nevada Court Improvement Program.Google Scholar
Summers, A., Gatowski, S., & DeVault, A. (2016). Research Report: Child abuse and neglect institute evaluation: Training impact on hearing practice. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
Summers, A., Gatowski, S., & Dobbin, S. (2012). Terminating parental rights: The relation of judicial experience and expectancy-related factors to risk perceptions in child protection cases. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.589388.Google Scholar
Summers, A., & Shdaimah, C. (2013). Improving juvenile dependency case timelines through use of the One Family, One Judge Model. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 64(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12001.Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office. (2007). African-American children in foster care: Additional HHS assistance needed to help states reduce the proportion in care (GAO-07-816). www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-816.Google Scholar
Warren, J. I., DuVal, J., Komarovskaya, I., et al. (2009). Developing a forensic service delivery system for juveniles adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8(4), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999011003635670.Google Scholar
Wood, S., Russell, J., Macgill, S., & Summers, A. (2014). The effects of judicial personnel on hearing and outcome timeliness in juvenile dependency cases. Family Court Journal, 52(1), 90–99. http://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12072.Google Scholar
Yi, Y., Edwards, F. R., & Wildeman, C. (2020). Cumulative prevalence of confirmed maltreatment and foster care placements for US children by race/ethnicity, 2011–2016. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 704–709. www.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305554.Google Scholar
Zill, N. (2011). Adoption from foster care: Aiding children while saving public money. Brookings Center on Children and Families.Google Scholar
Zinn, A., & Orlebeke, B. (2017). Juvenile court judicial expertise and children’s permanency outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 77, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.03.011.Google Scholar

References

Ansolabehere, S., De Figueiredo, J. M., & Snyder Jr, J. M. (2003). Why is there so little money in US politics? Journal of Economic perspectives, 17(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164976.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., Lindstädt, R., & Vander Wielen, R.J. (2016). The influence of news media on political elites: Investigating strategic responsiveness in Congress. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12171.Google Scholar
Arnold, L. W., Deen, R. E., & Patterson, S. C. (2000). Friendship and votes: The impact of interpersonal ties on legislative decision making. State and Local Government Review, 32(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X0003200206.Google Scholar
Banerjee, T., & Murray, J. (2021). Class dominance or fracturing? Sources of broad interest in lobbying by Fortune 500 corporations. Sociological Perspectives, 64(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420921883.Google Scholar
Barnello, M. A. (1999). Gender and roll call voting in the New York state assembly. Women & Politics, 20(4), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v20n04_04.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bergan, D. E., & Cole, R. T. (2015). Call your legislator: A field experimental study of the impact of a constituency mobilization campaign on legislative voting. Political Behavior, 37(1), 27–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43653416.Google Scholar
Broockman, D. E., & Skovron, C. (2019). Bias in perceptions of public opinion among political elites. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000011.Google Scholar
Burkett, T. L. (1997). Cosponsorship in the United States Senate: A network analysis of Senate communication and leadership, 1973–1990. Doctoral dissertation. University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (1998). Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy? Social Forces, 77(1), 27–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006009.Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219881.Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2006). Why estimates of the impact of public opinion policy are too high: Empirical and theoretical implications. Social Forces, 84(4), 2273–2289. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3844500.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00099.x.Google Scholar
Cardoso, E., & Helwege, A. (1991). Populism, profligacy, and redistribution. In Dornbusch, R & Edwards, S, The macroeconomics of populism in Latin America (pp. 45–74). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carmichael, J. T., & Brulle, R. J. (2017). Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 232–252. http://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433.Google Scholar
Conniff, M. L. (2020). A historiography of populism and neopopulism in Latin America. History Compass, 18(9), e12621. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12621.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1978). Pluralism revisited. Comparative Politics, 10(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/421645.Google Scholar
De Blasio, E., & Sorice, M. (2018). Populism between direct democracy and the technological myth. Palgrave Communications, 4(15). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0067-y.Google Scholar
De la Torre, C. (2010). Populist seduction in Latin America. Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. W. (2014). Who rules America? The triumph of the corporate rich. McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice, 155(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9871-2.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000500.Google Scholar
Felmlee, D. & Faris, R. (2013). Interaction in social networks. In DeLamater, J. & Ward, A. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.; pp. 465–490). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_15.Google Scholar
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., & Oliveros, V. (2019). Clientelism in Latin American politics. Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1677.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L., & Wayman, F. W. (1990). Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 797–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962767.Google Scholar
Heerwig, J. A., & Murray, J. (2019). The political strategies and unity of the American corporate inner circle: Evidence from political donations, 1982–2000. Social Problems, 66(4), 580-608. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spy014.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, A., Mildenberger, A., & Stokes, L. C. (2019). Legislative staff and representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000606.Google Scholar
Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure: A study of decision makers. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E., & Kingdon, J. W. (1992). Ideology, interest group scores, and legislative votes. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 805–823. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111592.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalaf-Hughes, N., & Kear, A. R. (2018). Framed for compromise? The role of bill framing in state legislative behavior on natural gas policy. The Policy Studies Journal, 46(3), 598–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12208.Google Scholar
Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2016). Campaign contributions facilitate access to Congressional officials: A randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 545–558. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24877480.Google Scholar
Knight, A. (1998). Populism and neo-populism in Latin America, especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X98005033.Google Scholar
Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303.Google Scholar
Leys, C. (1965). What is the problem about corruption? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 3(2), 215–230. http://www.jstor.org/stable/158703.Google Scholar
Manzetti, L., & Wilson, C. J. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005285759.Google Scholar
Méon, P. G., & Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122(1–2), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0.Google Scholar
Méon, P. G., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004.Google Scholar
Miliband, R. (1969). The state in capitalist society. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, A. D. (1979). Consistency between public preferences and national policy decisions. American Politics Research, 7(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7900700101.Google Scholar
Nakatani, Y. (2018). Global syndrome of neopopulism: A symptom of authoritarian reaction in the era of “after globalization.” Ritsumeikan Law Review, 36, 75–93. www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/rlr36/006nakataniyoshikazu.pdf.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018.Google Scholar
Peoples, C. D. (2008). Interlegislator relations and policy making: A sociological study of roll-call voting in a state legislature. Sociological Forum, 23(3), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00086.x.Google Scholar
Peoples, C. D. (2009). Reviving power structure research: Present problems, their solutions and future directions. Political Power and Social Theory, 20, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-8719(2009)0000020007.Google Scholar
Peoples, C. D. (2010). Contributor influence in congress: Social ties and PAC effects on US house policymaking. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(4), 649–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01187.x.Google Scholar
Peoples, C. D. (2020). The undermining of American democracy: How campaign contributions corrupt our system and harm us all. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324802.Google Scholar
Peoples, C. D., & Gortari, M. (2008). The impact of campaign contributions on policymaking in the US and Canada: Theoretical and public policy implications. Politics and Public Policy, 17, 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-9935(08)17003-6.Google Scholar
Poelmans, E., Dove, J. A., & Taylor, J. E. (2018). The politics of beer: Analysis of the congressional votes on the beer bill of 1933. Public Choice, 174, 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0493-1.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W. (1960). How to study community power: The pluralist alternative. Journal of Politics, 22(3), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126892.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111172.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 228–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111445.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. (1974). Political power and social classes. New Left Books.Google Scholar
Powell, L. W. (2012). The influence of campaign contributions in state legislatures: the effects of institutions and politics. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (1995). Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America: The Peruvian case. World Politics, 48(1), 82–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1995.0004.Google Scholar
Roscoe, D. D., & Jenkins, S. (2005). A meta-analysis of campaign contributions’ impact on roll call voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00290.x.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. E. (1979). Ideological coalitions in congress. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Segal, E. A., & Brzuzy, S. (1995). Gender and congressional voting: A legislative analysis. Affilia, 10(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/088610999501000103.Google Scholar
Shor, B. (2018). Ideology, party, and opinion: Explaining legislator ACA implementation votes in the states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 18(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440018786734.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1980). Political response to capitalist crisis: Neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal. Politics and Society, 10(2), 155–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928001000202.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683.Google Scholar
Stratmann, T. (2005). Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature. In Shughart, W. F. & Tollison, R. D. (Eds.), Policy challenges and political responses (pp. 135—156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28038-3_8.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. (1989). Voting patterns in the California assembly: Role and gender. Women & Politics, 9(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v09n04_03.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. (2004). An introduction to African politics (pp. 107–128). Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. (n.d.). Glossary: Clientelism. www.u4.no/terms#clientelism.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. F. (1978). Evaluating theories of congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 554–577. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110461.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (1999). Neoliberal populism in Latin America and eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/422236.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2003). Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: How much affinity? Third World Quarterly, 24(6), 1095–1115. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3993445.Google Scholar
Wright, S. D. (2000). The Tennessee black caucus of state legislators. Journal of Black Studies, 31(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193470003100101.Google Scholar

References

American Arbitration Association. (2021). ADR Rules. American Arbitration Association. www.adr.org/Rules.Google Scholar
Arad, S., & Carnevale, P. J. (1994). Partisanship effects in judgments of fairness and trust in third parties in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(3), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002794038003004.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Mnookin, R., Ross, L., Tversky, A., & Wilson, R. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers to conflict resolution. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., Bloom, D., & Dahl, G. (2013, February). Lawyers as agents of the devil in a prisoner’s dilemma game: Evidence from long run play. (NBER Working Paper No. w18834). https://doi.org/10.3386/w18834.Google Scholar
Berman, G. (1995). Facilitated negotiation: An effective ADR technique. Dispute Resolution Journal, 50(2), 18–29.Google Scholar
Best, A., & Andreasen, A. R. (1977). Consumer response to unsatisfactory purchases: Survey of perceiving defects, voicing complaints, and obtaining redress. Law & Society Review, 11(4), 701–744. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053179.Google Scholar
Beverland, M. B., Chung, E., & Kates, S. M. (2009). Exploring consumers’ conflict styles: Grudges and forgiveness following marketer failure. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 438–443.Google Scholar
Brett, J., & Thompson, L. (2016). Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.003.Google Scholar
Bush, R., & Folger, J. (1994). The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bush, R., & Folger, J. (2004). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cheung, S. O. (1999). Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00027-1.Google Scholar
Cheung, S. O., Li, K., & Chow, O. Y. (2020). Reactive devaluation as a psychological impediment to construction dispute negotiation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4), 04020025–1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000787.Google Scholar
Cobb, S. (2013). Speaking of violence: The politics and poetics of narrative in conflict resolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199826209.001.0001.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.945Google Scholar
Cole, S. (2001). Uniform arbitration: “One size fits all” does not fit. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 16(3), 759–789.Google Scholar
Cominelli, L., & Lucchiari, C. (2017). Italian mediators in action: The impact of style and attitude. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21206.Google Scholar
Conklin, C. N. (2016). Beyond the FAA: Arbitration procedure, practice, and policy in historical perspective. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 16(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
de Dreu, C. K., Koole, S. L., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.975.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1995). William James: The first peace psychologist. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac0101_5.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T., & Lanvers, C. (2009). What is the settlement rate and why should we care? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(1), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01139.x.Google Scholar
Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, H.R. 4445, 117th Cong. (2022). www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4445.Google Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. (1984). Against settlement. Yale Law Journal, 93(6), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.2307/796205.Google Scholar
Frenkel, D. & Stark, J. (2015). Improving lawyers’ judgment: Is mediation training de-biasing? Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 21, 1–58.Google Scholar
Friend, W., & Malhotra, D. (2019). Psychological barriers to resolving intergroup conflict: An extensive review and consolidation of the literature. Negotiation Journal, 35(4), 407–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12299.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. (1984). Value creation by business lawyers: Legal skills and asset pricing. Yale Law Journal, 94(2), 239–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/796226.Google Scholar
Golann, D. (2013). Sharing a mediator’s powers: Effective advocacy in settlement. American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2004). Let’s arbitrate a deal. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 11(27), 27–28.Google Scholar
Goldfien, J. H., & Robbennolt, J. K. (2007). What if the lawyers have their way? An empirical assessment of conflict strategies and attitudes toward mediation styles. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 22(2), 277–319. https://doi.org/1811/77125.Google Scholar
Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C. (2003). Panacea or Pandora’s box? The costs of options in negotiation. Iowa Law Review, 88(3), 601–653.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. (2009). Consumer decision making in low‐income families: The case of conflict avoidance. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 8(5), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.285.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280.Google Scholar
Harth, N. S., & Shnabel, N. (2015). Third-party intervention in intergroup reconciliation: The role of neutrality and common identity with the other conflict party. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(5), 676–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583151.Google Scholar
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game; a case study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057880.Google Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, R. (2010). Just negotiation. Washington University Law Review, 88, 381–431.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. (1997/1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 110(5), 991–1009.Google Scholar
Holt, J. L., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002.Google Scholar
Islami, H. (2016). Marital conflicts resolution styles. CBU International Conference Proceedings, 4, 569–572. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v4.815.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Conflict resolution and peer mediation programs in elementary and secondary schools: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 459–506. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004459.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., Evans, D., & Rachlinski, J. (2012). “They saw a protest”: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64(4), 851–906.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90015-Y.Google Scholar
Lande, J. (2009). A recent innovation, “cooperative” negotiation can promote early and efficient settlement through joint case management. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 27(7), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/alt.20288.Google Scholar
Leung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002188019001009.Google Scholar
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231.Google Scholar
Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive devaluation of an “Israeli” vs. “Palestinian” peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(4), 515–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046004003.Google Scholar
Melnikoff, D. E., & Strohminger, N. (2020). The automatic influence of advocacy on lawyers and novices. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1258–1264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00943-3.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2001). Aha? Is creativity possible in legal problem solving and teachable in legal education? Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 6, 97–144.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002). The lawyer as consensus builder: Ethics for a new practice. Tennessee Law Review, 70(1), 63–119.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. (1993). Why negotiations fail: An exploration of barriers to the resolution of conflict. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 8(2), 235–249.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. & Gilson, R. (1994). Disputing through agents: Cooperation and conflict between lawyers in litigation. Columbia Law Review, 94(2), 509–566. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123202.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88(5), 950–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/795824.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R., Peppet, S., & Tulumello, D. (2000). Beyond winning: Negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (1997). Casting light on the black box of mediation: Should mediators make their conduct more transparent? Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 13(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2005). Schmediation and the dimensions of definition. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 10(69), 69–102.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2010). Islands, vitamins, salt, germs: Four visions of the future of ADR in law schools (and a data-driven snapshot of the field today). Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 25(1), 25–85.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2019). Settlement malpractice. University of Chicago Law Review, 86(7), 1825–1900.Google Scholar
Mosten, F. (2008). Collaborative law practice: An unbundled approach to informed client decision making. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2008(1), 163–190.Google Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.Google Scholar
Nicotera, A. M. (2021). Nursing and conflict communication: A review. Nursing Communication, 1(1), 60–79.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, L. (2016). Mediation as regulation: Expanding state governance over private disputes. Utah Law Review, 2016(2), 361–415.Google Scholar
Poppe, E. S. T. (2019). Why consumer defendants lump it. Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, 14(2), 149–190.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. & Kim, S. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/2559855.Google Scholar
Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786482.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. (2012). Games, dystopia, and ADR. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 27(3), 477–538.Google Scholar
Riedy, M., & Greenwald, N. (2015). Mediating discovery disputes: When “meet and confer” alone is not enough. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 307–322.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. (2008). Attorneys, apologies, and settlement negotiation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13(2), 349–397.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2014). Litigation and settlement. In Zamir, E. & Teichman, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law (pp. 623–642). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, H. (1980). Settled out of court: The social process of insurance claims adjustment (2nd ed.). Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
Ross, L. (1995). Reactive devaluation in negotiation and conflict resolution. In Arrow, K., Mnookin, R., Ross, L., Tversky, A., & Wilson, R. (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution (pp. 27–42). W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Saucier, D. A., Miller, S. S., Martens, A. L., O’Dea, C. J., & Jones, T. L. (2018). Individual differences explain regional differences in honor-related outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.046.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1999). The intersection of therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and alternative dispute resolution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.5.4.1084.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. L. & Rosen, B. (1994). An investigation of managerial interventions in employee disputes. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 7(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621059.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. (2014). The psychology of procedural preference: How litigants evaluate legal procedures ex ante. Iowa Law Review, 99, 638–710.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. (2016). How litigants evaluate the characteristics of legal procedures: A multi-court empirical study. University of California at Davis Law Review, 49(3), 792–841.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. (2017). When ignorance is not bliss: An empirical study of litigants’ awareness of court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution programs. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 22, 189–239.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2(3), 883–947.Google Scholar
Sovern, J., Greenberg, E., Kirgis, P., & Liu, Y. (2015). “Whimsy little contracts” with unexpected consequences: An empirical analysis of consumer understanding of arbitration agreements. Maryland Law Review, 75(1), 1–133.Google Scholar
Sternlight, J. (2005). Creeping mandatory arbitration: Is it just? Stanford Law Review, 57(5), 1631–1675.Google Scholar
Stone, D., Heen, S., & Patton, B. (2010). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most (2nd ed.). Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Szalai, I. S. (2013). Outsourcing justice: The rise of modern arbitration law in America. Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020). Personality traits and conflict resolution styles: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109794.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J.W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1978). Comparison of four instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psychological Reports, 42(3), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3c.1139.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. (1995). “They saw a negotiation”: Partisanship and involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.839.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100458.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions, and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(2), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022872.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., & Lind, E. (2001). Procedural justice. In Sanders, J. & Hamilton, V. (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65, 69–70). Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-351ss4.49.3.577.Google Scholar
Voss, C. (2016). Never split the difference: Negotiating as if your life depended on it. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. (2001). Making deals in court-connected mediation: What’s justice got to do with it? Washington University Law Quarterly, 79(3), 787–861.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. (2004). Stepping back through the looking glass: Real conversations with real disputants about institutionalized mediation and its value. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 19(2), 573–578.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. (2017). Do you believe in magic?: Self-determination and procedural justice meet inequality in court-connected mediation. SMU Law Review, 70(3), 721–762.Google Scholar
Wissler, R. (1997). The effects of mandatory mediation: Empirical research on the experience of small claims and common pleas courts. Willamette Law Review, 33(3), 565–604.Google Scholar

References

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x.Google Scholar
Armstrong, T. A., & Boutwell, B. B. (2012). Low resting heart rate and rational choice: Integrating biological correlates of crime in criminological theories. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.001.Google Scholar
Blakemore, S. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2012). Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nature Neuroscience, 15(9), 1184–1191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3177.Google Scholar
Boivin, R. (2018). Routine activity, population(s), and crime: Spatial heterogeneity and conflicting propositions about the neighborhood crime-population link. Applied Geography, 95, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.016.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31(4), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.673632.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Turchan, B. S., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2019). Hot spots policing and crime reduction: An update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09372-3.Google Scholar
Buchen, L. (2012, April 18). Arrested development. Nature, 484, 304–306.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. G., & Newman, G. R. (Eds.). (2005). Designing out crime from products and systems: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 18). Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589Google Scholar
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer.Google Scholar
Crone, E. A., Bullens, L., van der Plas, E. A. A., Kijkuit, E. Z., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 20(4), 1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579408000588.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam.Google Scholar
de Jong, E., Bernasco, W., & Lammers, M. (2020). Situational correlates of adolescent substance use: An improved test of the routine activity theory of deviant behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(4), 823–850. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.2038c252.Google Scholar
Delpech, D., Barrion, H., & Johnson, S. (2021). Systematic review of situational prevention methods for crime against species. Crime Science, 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00138-1.Google Scholar
Erickson, M. L., Gibbs, J. P., & Jensen, G. F. (1977). The deterrence doctrine and the perceived certainty of legal punishments. American Sociological Review, 42(2), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094607.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. P. (1975) Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grasmick, H. G., & Bryjak, G. J. (1980). The deterrent effect of perceived severity of punishment. Social Forces, 59(2), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/59.2.471.Google Scholar
Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology, 47(4), 1331–1368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00177.x.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. (2007). Situational crime prevention and its discontents: Rational choice theory versus the “culture of now.” Social Policy and Administration, 41(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00550.x.Google Scholar
Hill, B., & Paynich, R. (2014). Fundamentals of crime mapping (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. B., Dariotis, J. K., & Wang, C. (2012). Adolescent risk-taking under stressed and non-stressed conditions: Conservative, calculating and impulsive types. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(2 suppl), S34–S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.021.Google Scholar
Lindegaard, M. R., Bernasco, W., Jacques, S., & Zenebergen, B. (2014). Posterior gains and immediate pains: Offender emotions before, during and after robberies. In van Gelder, J.-L., Elffers, H., Reynald, D., & Nagin, D. (Eds.), Affect and cognition in criminal decision-making (pp. 58–76). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W., Wilson, D. B., & Cothern, L. (2000, April). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Office of Justice Program, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Little, G. L. (2004). Treating juvenile offenders and at-risk youth with MRT: Comprehensive review of outcome literature. Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Review, 13(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
Little, G. L. (2005). Meta-analysis of moral reconation therapy recidivism results from probation and parole implementations. Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Review, 14(1–2), 14–16.Google Scholar
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, E. S. (2010). Twenty-year recidivism results for MRT-treated offenders: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Community Corrections, 19(3–4), 15–16, 34.Google Scholar
Loughran, T. A., Paternoster, R., Chalfin, A., & Wilson, T. (2016). Can rational choice be considered a general theory of crime? Evidence from individual-level panel data. Criminology, 54(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12097.Google Scholar
Lynch, M., Stretesky, P. B., & Long, M. A. (2018). Situational crime prevention and the ecological regulation of green crime: A review and discussion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 679(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218789080.Google Scholar
Miljkovic, D. (2005). Rational choice and irrational individuals or simply an irrational theory: A critical review of the hypothesis of perfect rationality. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(5), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2003.12.031.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2013). Individual offending, routine activities, and activity settings: Revisiting the routine activity theory of general deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(3), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811432641.Google Scholar
Mulford, C. F., Blachman-Demner, D. R., Pitzer, L., et al. (2018). Victim offender overlap: Dual trajectory examination of victimization and offending among young felony offenders over seven years. Victims and Offenders, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1196283.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263. https://doi.org/10.1086/670398.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review, 27(3), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054102.Google Scholar
Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 765–824. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol100/iss3/6.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C. (2008). Rational choice theory, crime control policy, and criminological relevance. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00489.x.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450. https://doi.org/10.1086/655357.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C., & Turanovic, J. J. (2018). Celerity and deterrence. In Nagin, D. S., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (Eds.), Deterrence, choice, and crime: Contemporary perspectives – Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 23, pp. 187–210). Routledge.Google Scholar
Raine, A., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (1997). Low resting heart rate at age 3 years predisposes to aggression at age 11 years: Evidence from the Mauritius Child Health Project. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(10), 1457–1464. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199710000-00029.Google Scholar
Sharp, C. (2008). Theory of mind and conduct problems in children: Deficits in reading the “emotions of the eyes.” Cognition and Emotion, 22(6), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701667586.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 2). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, H., Blennow, K., Sjodin, A.-K., & Forsman, A. (2003). New evidence for an association between the CSF HVA:5-HIAA ratio and psychopathic traits. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 74(7), 918–921. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.7.918.Google Scholar
Stafford, M. C., & Warr, M. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030002001.Google Scholar
van Gelder, J.-L., de Vries, R. E., Demetriou, A., van Sintemaartensdijk, I., & Donker, T. (2019). The virtual reality scenario method: Moving from imagination to immersion in criminal decision-making research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(3), 451–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818819696.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (2015). The decision to commit crime: Rational or nonrational? Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law, & Society, 16(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (2017). Modelling the criminal lifestyle: Theorizing at the edge of chaos. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (2020). Neutralization, moral disengagement, and delinquency in adolescence: Testing the reciprocal effects of proactive criminal thinking and guilt on future offending. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1537401.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D., & Morgan, R. D. (2019). Certainty of punishment and criminal thinking: Do the rational and non-rational parameters of a student’s decision to cheat on an exam interact? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 30(2), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2018.1488982.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D., Morgan, R. D., & Scanlon, F. (2019). The moderating effect of criminal thinking on certainty of apprehension in decisions to engage in antisocial behavior: Replication and extension. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(3), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13905.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D., Ponce, R., Piñero, M. A., & Ernest, K. D. (2021). Criminal thinking, certainty of apprehension, and the decision to engage in antisocial behavior: A study of day treatment program clients. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 66(2), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14633.Google Scholar
Weaver, F. M., & Carroll, J. S. (1985). Crime perceptions in a natural setting by expert and novice shoplifters. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786696.Google Scholar
Zafirovski, M. (2012). Beneath rational choice: Elements of “irrational choice theory.” Current Sociology, 61(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112465872.Google Scholar

References

Banks, S. (2013). Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: Professional wisdom and ethics work. European Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.732931.Google Scholar
Bingham, T. (2011). The rule of law. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Braye, S. & Preston-Shoot, M. (1999). Accountability, administrative law and social work practice: Redressing or reinforcing the power imbalance? Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 21(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069908410571.Google Scholar
Braye, S. & Preston-Shoot, M. (2006a). Broadening the vision: Law teaching, social work and civil society. International Social Work, 49(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872806063411.Google Scholar
Braye, S. & Preston-Shoot, M. (2006b). The role of law in welfare reform: critical perspectives on the relationship between law and social work practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00603.x.Google Scholar
Braye, S. & Preston-Shoot, M. (2016). Practising social work law (4th ed). Palgrave.Google Scholar
Braye, S. & Preston-Shoot, M. (2020). Legal literacy: Change project. Research in Practice.Google Scholar
Braye, S., Orr, D. and Preston-Shoot, M. (2013a). A scoping study of workforce development for self-neglect work. Skills for Care.Google Scholar
Braye, S., Preston-Shoot, M., Johns, R., Cull, L-A. & Roche, J. (2005). Knowledge review: Teaching, learning and assessment of law in social work education. Social Care Institute for Excellence.Google Scholar
Braye, S., Preston-Shoot, M. & Wigley, V. (2013b). Deciding to use the law in social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017311431476.Google Scholar
Brisebois, K., Kernsmith, P. D., & Idalski Carcone, A. (2013). The relationship between caseworker attitudes about kinship care and removal decisions. Journal of Family Social Work, 16(5), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2013.832459.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J., Langan, J., Patsios, D. & Jepson, M. (2014). Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards: What determines the judgements of Best Interests Assessors? A factorial survey. Journal of Social Work, 14(6), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017313504180.Google Scholar
Carson, D. (2012). Reviewing reviews of professionals’ risk-taking decisions. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2012.753729.Google Scholar
DeNard, C., Garcia, A., & Circo, E. (2017). Caseworker perspectives on mental health disparities among racial/ethnic minority youth in child welfare. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1299827.Google Scholar
DeRoma, V. M., Kessler, M. L., McDaniel, R., & Soto, C. M. (2006). Important risk factors in home-removal decisions: Social caseworker perceptions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-006-0047-8.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. (2011). Explicit argumentation as a supervisory tool for decision making in child protection cases involving human rights issues. Practice, 23(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2010.532546.Google Scholar
Elmaliach-Mankita, H., Weiss-Gal, I. & Gal, J. (2019). Preparing social workers to affect policy: the parliament as a venue for training. Social Work Education, 38(4), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1542423.Google Scholar
Everson, M. D., & Sandoval, J. M. (2011). Forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Assessing subjectivity and bias in professional judgements. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.001.Google Scholar
Hope-Hailey, V. Searle, R. & Dietz, G. (2012). Where has all the trust gone? Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
International Federation of Social Workers [IFSW] & International Association of Schools of Social Work [IASSW] (2014). Global definition of social work. IFSW.Google Scholar
Lynch, D. & Forde, C. (2016). “Moral distress” and the beginning practitioner: Preparing social work students for ethical and moral challenge in contemporary contexts. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2016.1155634.Google Scholar
Mason, B. (2019). Re-visiting safe uncertainty: Six perspectives for clinical practice and the assessment of risk. Journal of Family Therapy, 41(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12258.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. (2007). Emotional intelligence, emotion and social work: context, characteristics, complications and contribution. British Journal of Social Work, 37(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl016.Google Scholar
Munro, E. (2010). Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq024.Google Scholar
Munro, E. (2012). The Munro review of child protection. Progress report: Moving towards a child centred system. The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life (1995). The seven principles of public life. The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
O’Connor, L. and Leonard, K. (2014). Decision-making in children and families social work: The practitioner’s voice. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct051.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M. J., Stritch, J. M., & Thuesen, F. (2018). Punishment on the frontlines of public service delivery: Client ethnicity and caseworker sanctioning decisions in a Scandinavian welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy018.Google Scholar
Phillippo, K. L., Kelly, M. S., Shayman, E., & Frey, A. (2017). School social worker practice decisions: The impact of professional models, training, and school context. Families in Society, 98(4), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2017.98.40.Google Scholar
Pike, L. and Wilkinson, K. (2013). How to get Learning into Practice. Research in Practice for Adults.Google Scholar
Preston-Shoot, M. (2010). On the evidence for viruses in social work systems: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 13(4) 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903471211.Google Scholar
Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903471229.Google Scholar
Preston-Shoot, M. (2019). Making good decisions: Law for social work practice (2nd ed). Red Globe Press/Macmillan International.Google Scholar
Preston-Shoot, M., McKimm, J. & Thurnham, A. (2013). Outcomes of law teaching in social work education: Further findings from a cohort study. Social Work Education, 32(5), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.695344.Google Scholar
Preston-Shoot, M., Roberts, G. and Vernon, S. (2001) Values in social work law: strained relations or sustaining relationships? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 20(2), 137–150.Google Scholar
Sachs, A (2009). The strange alchemy of life and law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, C. (1977). Social workers’ orientations: an action perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 7(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a056811.Google Scholar
Zifcak, S. (2009). Towards a reconciliation of legal and social work practice. In Swain, P. & Rice, S. (Eds.), In the shadow of the law: The legal context of social work practice (pp. 427–438). The Federation Press.Google Scholar

References

Altimus., C. M. , Marlin, B. J., Charalambakis, N. E., et al. (2020). The next 50 years of neuroscience. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0744-19.2019.Google Scholar
Antusch, S., Custers, R., Marien, H., & Aarts, H. (2021). Intentional action and limitation of personal autonomy: Do restrictions of action selection decrease the sense of agency? Consciousness and Cognition, 88, 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103076.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 319(25), 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198812223192504.Google Scholar
Avila, A., & Leeper, E. (2022). Assessment of barriers to effective use of psychiatric advance directives: Providers’ knowledge and attitudes. Psychological Services, 19(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000525.Google Scholar
Baisch, S., Abele, C., Theile-Schurholz, A., et al. (2022). Project DECIDE, part 1: Increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning – a prospective double‑arm intervention study. BMC Medical Ethics, 23, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00854-0.Google Scholar
Bazzano, L. A.., Durant, J., & Brantley, P. R. (2021). A modern history of informed consent and the role of key information. Ochsner Journal, 21(5), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0105.Google Scholar
Bester, J., Cole, C. M., & Kodish, E. (2016). The limits of informed consent for an overwhelmed patient: Clinicians’ role in protecting patients and preventing overwhelm. AMA Journal of Ethics, 18(9), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.peer2-1609.Google Scholar
Bitenc, U. M. , Grad, O. T. , & De Leo, D. (2020). Understanding suicide from survivors’ perspective – psychological autopsy outcomes: The model of a hot air balloon. In De Leo, D & Poštuvan, V (Eds.), Reducing the toll of suicide: Resources for communities, groups, and individuals (pp. 185–201). Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Borecka-Biernat, D. (2018). The role of emotional reactions and retrospective assessment of parental attitudes in controlling destructive strategies for coping with a social conflict situation by junior high school students. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 6(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.75709Google Scholar
Bush, S. S., & Heck, A. L. (2018). Psychology’s role in guardianship and conservatorship evaluations. In Dudley, K. C. & Edmonds, N. (Eds.), Forensic geropsychology: Practice essentials (pp. 257–279). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. J. (2009). Campbell’s psychiatric dictionary (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canterbury v. Spence, 150 US App. D.C. 263, 464 F.2d 772 (1972).Google Scholar
Chase, R. H. (1918). To make a valid will. In Chase, R. H., The ungeared mind (pp. 135–147). F. A. Davis. https://doi.org/10.1037/14447-007.Google Scholar
Chipidza, F. E., Wallwork, R. S., & Stern, T. A. (2015). Impact of the doctor–patient relationship. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 17(5), e10.4088/PCC.15f01840. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15f01840.Google Scholar
Convie, L. J., Carson, E., McCuster, D., et al. (2020). The patient and clinician experience of informed consent for surgery: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMC Medical Ethics, 21, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00501-6.Google Scholar
Dayton, A. K. (2012). Standards for health care decision-making: Legal and practical considerations. Utah Law Review, 2002(3), 1329–1444.Google Scholar
Drogin, E. Y., & Barrett, C. L. (2013). Civil competencies. In Otto, R. K. & Weiner, I. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (pp. 295–307). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Drogin, E. Y., & Dattilio, F. M. (2015). Forensic psychiatry and psychology: Fraternal twins of courtroom science. In Sadoff, R. L. (Ed.), The evolution of forensic psychiatry: History, current developments, future directions (pp. 205–211). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199393435.003.0019.Google Scholar
Elzakkers, I. F. F. M., Danner, U. N., Grisso, T., Hoek, H. W., & van Elburg, A. A. (2018). Assessment of mental capacity to consent to treatment in anorexia nervosa: A comparison of clinical judgment and MacCAT-T and consequences for clinical practice. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 58, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.001.Google Scholar
Fleischner, R. D. (2021). Adult guardianship, conservatorship, substituted judgement, and alternatives. In Legal Rights of Individuals with Disabilities (3rd ed.) (pp. 1–18). MCLE New England, Inc.Google Scholar
Foubister, N., & Connell, M. (2011). Competency to consent to treatment. In Drogin, E. Y., Dattilo, F. M., Sadoff, R. L., & Gutheil, T. G. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic assessment: psychological and psychiatric perspectives (pp. 503–519). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Garner, B. A. (2019). Black’s law dictionary (11th ed.). Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
Gerstenecker, A., Martin, R. C., Hebert, K., Triebel, K., & Marson, D. C. (2022). Cognitive correlates of impaired testamentary capacity in Alzheimer’s dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(6), 1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac034.Google Scholar
Gold, L. H. (2002). Psychiatric diagnoses and the retrospective assessment of mental states. In Simon, R. I. & Shuman, D. W. (Eds.), Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past (pp. 335–367). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Grisso, T. (2006). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). Springer.Google Scholar
Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. K. B., Phelan, C. H., Chin, N. A., et al. (2020). The U-ARE protocol: A pragmatic approach to decisional capacity assessment for clinical research. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 73(2), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190457.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. (1978). The Roman law of guardianship in England, 1300–1600. Tulane Law Review, 52(2), 223–257.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A. J. (2017). Testation and the mind. Washington and Lee Law Review, 74(1), 285–267.Google Scholar
Karel, M. J., Gurrera, R. J., Hicken, B., & Moye, J. (2010). Reasoning in the capacity to make medical decisions: The consideration of values. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(1), 58–71.Google Scholar
Kilbride, M. K., & Joffe, S. (2018). The new age of patient autonomy: Implications for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 320(19), 1973–1974. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14382.Google Scholar
Kiriaev, O., Chacko, E., Jurgens, J. D., et al. (2018). Should capacity assessments be performed routinely prior to discussing advance care planning with older people? International Psychogeriatrics, 30(8), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217002836Google Scholar
Knoll, J. L. IV. (2009). The psychological autopsy, part 2: Toward a standardized protocol. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 15(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000344920.36157.95.Google Scholar
Lai, J. M., Gill, T. M., Cooney, L. M., et al. (2008). Everyday decision-making ability in older persons with cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16(8), 693–696. https://doi.org/10.1097/jgp.0b013e31816c7b54.Google Scholar
Leenaars, A. A., Dieserud, G., Wenckstern, S., et al. (2018). A multidimensional theory of suicide: A psychological autopsy corroborative study. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 39(6), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000508.Google Scholar
McSwiggan, S., Meares, S., & Porter, M. (2016). Decision-making capacity evaluation in adult guardianship: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(3), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610215001490.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., et al. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Azar, A. R., & Gurrera, R. J. (2004). Capacity to consent to treatment: Empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. The Gerontologist, 44(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.2.166.Google Scholar
Moye, J., & Naik, A. D. (2011). Preserving rights for individuals facing guardianship. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 305(9), 936–937, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.247.Google Scholar
Nijhawan, L., Janodia, M., Muddukrishna, B., et al. (2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 4(3), 134–140.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. J. (2015). Psychiatric advance directives. In Corrigan, P. W. (Ed.), Person-centered care for mental illness: The evolution of adherence and self-determination (pp. 103–116). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14644-006.Google Scholar
Pereira, F. S., Yassuda, M. S., Oliveria, A. M., & Forlenza, O. V. (2008). Executive dysfunction correlates with impaired functional status in older adults with varying degrees of cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 20(6), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610208007631.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., & Wendler, D. (2015). Clarifying substituted judgment: The endorsed life approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(9), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101852.Google Scholar
Rabinovici, G. D., Stephens, M. L., & Possin, K. L. (2015). Executive dysfunction. Continuum, 21(3), 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000466658.05156.54.Google Scholar
Ramos, G., Ponting, C., Labao, J. P., & Sobowale, K. (2021). Considerations of diversity, equity, and inclusion in mental health apps: A scoping review of evaluation frameworks. Behavior Research and Therapy, 147, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103990.Google Scholar
Read, S. L., & Spar, J. E. (2018). Capacity, informed consent, and guardianship. In Holzer, J. C., Kohn, R., Ellison, J. M., & Recupero, P. R. (Eds.), Geriatric forensic psychiatry: Principles and practice (pp. 75–81). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 154 Cal. App. 2d 560; 317 P.2d 170 (1957).Google Scholar
Selinger, P. (2009). The right to consent: Is it absolute? British Journal of Medical Practitioners (BJMP), 2(2), 50–54.Google Scholar
Shuman, D. W. (2002). Retrospective assessment of mental states and the law. In Simon, R. I. & Shuman, D. W. (Eds.), Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past (pp. 21–45). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Tinland, A., Loubière, S., Mougeot, F., et al. (2022). Effect of psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers on compulsory admission among people with mental illness: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 79(8), 752–759. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1627.Google Scholar
Torke, A. M., Alexander, G. C., & Lantos, J. (2008). Substituted judgment: The limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision-making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(9), 1514–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0688-8.Google Scholar
Tseng, W. S., Matthews, D., & Elwyn, T. S. (2004). Cultural competence in forensic mental health: A guide for psychiatrists, psychologists and attorneys. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ubel, P. A., Scherr, K. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2018). Autonomy: What’s shared decision making got to do with it? American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), W11–W12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409844.Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission. (n.d.). Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act. https://tinyurl.com/laws-UAGPPJA.Google Scholar
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Williamson, B. (2019). Brain data: Scanning, scraping and sculpting the plastic learning brain through neurotechnology. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0008-5.Google Scholar
Zietlow, K., Dubin, L., Battles, A., & Vitale, C. (2022) Guardianship: A medicolegal review for clinicians. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70, 3070–3079. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17797.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×