Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:39:19.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - Human Rights and Reconciliation

Theoretical and Empirical Connections

from Part V - Future Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

By
Gabriel Velez ,
Gabriel Twose  and
Wilson López López
Edited by
Neal S. Rubin  and
Roseanne L. Flores
Neal S. Rubin
Affiliation:
Adler University
Roseanne L. Flores
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Reconciliation requires individuals and groups to address past and present inequality, injustice, and violence to construct better futures based on stronger social bonds and a respect for human rights. Yet, the theoretical threads connecting the concepts are rarely unraveled. This chapter uses psychological frameworks to better understand reconciliation in relation to human rights. The authors propose that in postconflict settings, reconciliation and human rights are interdependent and mutually reinforcing, and neither is truly possible without the other. First, the authors briefly review understandings of reconciliation and how they are advanced by postconflict mechanisms such as truth commissions. Second, the authors explain how reconciliation may be connected to greater respect for human rights. Third, Colombia is used as a case study to demonstrate the complex relationships between forgiveness, reconciliation, and human rights. Finally, the chapter offers future directions for research at the intersection of human rights, psychology, and reconciliation.

Keywords

reconciliationtransitional justicememoryforgivenesstruthtruth commissionsColombia
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights , pp. 537 - 552
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, I. M. O. (2017). Seeking truth in Colombia: Perspectives on a truth commission. Razón Crítica, 2, 21–50.Google Scholar
Aiken, N. T. (2010). Learning to live together: Transitional justice and intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(2), 166–188.Google Scholar
Afonso, C., & Beristain, C. M. (2013). Memoria para la vida una comisión de la verdad desde las mujeres para Colombia. Bilbao: Universidad del País. http://rutapacifica.org.co/documentos/memoriaparalavida.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Alzate, M., & Dono, M. (2017). Reconciliación social como estrategia para la transformación de los conflictos socio-políticos, variables asociadas e instrumentos de medición. Universitas Psychologica, 16(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Y. (2004). The role of forgiveness in reconciliation. In Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 149–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.). (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (2004). Nature, rationale and effectiveness of education for coexistence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 253–271.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (2009). Reconciliation as a foundation of a culture of peace. In de Rivera, J. (Ed.), Handbook on building cultures of peace (pp. 363–378). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Bell, C. (2009). Transitional justice, interdisciplinarity, and the state of the “field” or “non-field.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3, 5–27.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T., & Huyse, L. (Eds.). (2003). Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Borja, H., Barreto, I., Alzate, M., Sabucedo, J. M., & López López, W. (2009). Creencias sobre el adversario, violencia política y procesos de paz. Psicothema, 21(4), 622–627.Google Scholar
Byrne, C. (2004). Benefit or burden: Victims’ reflection on TRC participation. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10(3), 237–256.Google Scholar
Chapman, A. (2007). Truth commissions and intergroup forgiveness: The case of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Peace and conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13(1), 51–69.Google Scholar
Daniels, J. P. (2018). Mental health in post-conflict Colombia. Lancet Psychiatry, 5, 199.Google Scholar
De La Rey, C., & Owens, I. (1998). Perceptions of psychosocial healing and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 4(3), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisikovits, N. (2010). Sympathizing with the enemy: Reconciliation, transitional justice, negotiation. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 133–155). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, L. E., & Weinstein, H. M. (2002). Violence and social repair: Rethinking the contribution of justice to reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 24(3), 573–639.Google Scholar
Galindo, J. (2018, March 12). ¿Fragmentación o polarización? El País. https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/03/12/colombia/1520862830_961463.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gardner Feldman, L. (1999). The principle and practice of “reconciliation” in German foreign policy: Relations with France, Israel, Poland and the Czech Republic. International Affairs, 75, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. L. (2004). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 201–217.Google Scholar
Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2003). A human being died that night: A South African story of forgiveness. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldstone, R. J. (1996). Justice as a tool for peacemaking: Truth commissions and international criminal tribunals. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 28, 485–503.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, K. (2000). Amnesty’s justice. In Rotberg, R. & Thompson, D. (Eds.), Truth v. justice: The morality of truth commissions (pp. 189–210). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guttman, A., & Thomson, D. (2000). The moral foundations of truth commissions. In Rotberg, R. & Thompson, D. (Eds.), Truth v. justice: The morality of truth commissions (pp. 22–44). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, G. (1998). We suffer our memories: Thinking about the past, healing, and reconciliation. American Imago, 55, 29–50.Google Scholar
Hayner, P. (2011). Unspeakable truths: Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hermann, T. (2004). Reconciliation: Reflections on the theoretical and practical utility of the term. In Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Idrobo, F., Hessel, P., Harker, A., Evans-Lacko, S., & Avendaño, M. (2018). Mental health of victims and ex-FARC members: A challenge for the peace process in Colombia. Lancet Psychiatry, 5(6), 467–468.Google Scholar
Jaramillo Marín, J. (2011). Experts and commissions study on violence in Colombia. Estudios Políticos, 39, 231–258.Google Scholar
Kacowicz, A. M., Bar-Siman-Tov, Y., Elgstrom, O., & Jerneck, M. (Eds.). (2000). Stable peace among nations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kalach Torres, G. (2016). Las comisiones de la verdad en Colombia. Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D’Filippo, 8(16), 106–124.Google Scholar
Kim, H., & Sikkink, K. (2010). Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions for transitional countries. International Studies Quarterly, 54(4), 939–963.Google Scholar
Kordon, D., Edelman, L., Lagos, D., Nicoletti, E., & Bozzolo, R. C. (1988). Psychological effects of political repression. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana/Planeta.Google Scholar
Kriesberg, L. (2004), Comparing reconciliation actions within and between countries. In Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 81–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landsman, S. (1996). Alternative responses to serious human rights abuses: Of prosecution and truth commissions. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4), 81–92.Google Scholar
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Leebaw, B. A. (2003). Legitimation or judgment? South Africa’s restorative approach to transitional justice. Polity, 36(1), 23–51.Google Scholar
Lie, T. G., Binningsbø, H. M., & Gates, S. (2007, April). Post-conflict justice and sustainable peace. Post-Conflict Transition Working Paper No. 5; World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4191. www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/04/09/000016406_20070409111614/Rendered/PDF/wps4191.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lira, I. K. (1991). Psicología de la amenaza política y el miedo. Santiago: Centro de Estudios Sociales (CESOC).Google Scholar
López López, W., Pineda Marín, C. P., Murcia León, M. C., Perilla Garzón, D. C., & Mullet, E. (2013). Forgiving perpetrators of violence: Colombian people’s positions. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 287–301.Google Scholar
López López, W., Sandoval Alvarado, G., Rodríguez, S., Ruiz, C., León, J. D., Pineda-Marín, C., & Mullet, E. (2018). Forgiving former perpetrators of violence and reintegrating them into Colombian civil society: Noncombatant citizens’ positions. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, W. J., & Brecke, P. (2003). War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marrow, D. (1999). Seeking peace amid memories of war: Learning from the peace process in Northern Ireland. In Rothstein, R. L. (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 111–138). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Martín-Beristain, C., Páez, D., Rimé, B., & Kanyangara, P. (2010). Psychosocial effects of participation in rituals of transitional justice: A collective-level analysis and review of the literature of the effects of TRCs and trials on human rights violations in Latin America. Revista de Psicología Social, 25(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
Meertens, D., & Zambrano, M. (2010). Citizenship deferred: The politics of victimhood, land restitution and gender justice in the Colombian (post?) conflict. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, J. (2008). Varieties of reconciliation. Law and Social Enquiry, 33(1), 195–231.Google Scholar
Millar, G. (2010a). Local evaluations of justice through truth telling in Sierra Leone: Postwar needs and transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(3), 477–496.Google Scholar
Millar, G. (2010b.) Healing and justice through truth-telling: Local perceptions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Sierra Leone. Social Science: Dissertations and Theses. Paper 167. http://surface.syr.edu/socsci_etd/167Google Scholar
Millar, G. (2011). Between Western theory and local practice: Cultural impediments to truth-telling in Sierra Leone. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 29(2), 177–199.Google Scholar
Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press Books.Google Scholar
Moosa, S. (2000). Truth and reconciliation as performance: Spectres of eucaristic redemption. In Villa-Vicencio, C. & Verwoerd, W. (Eds.), Looking back, reaching forward: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (pp. 113–122). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Mutumba, J., & Izabliliza, J. (2005). The role of women in reconciliation and peace building in Rwanda: Ten years after genocide. National Unity and Reconciliation Commission. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan031033.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: The instrumental and socio-emotional paths and the need based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In Nadler, A., Malloy, T., & Fisher, J. D. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56).New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (1974, December 14). Declaration on the Protection of Women and Children in Emergency and Armed Conflict. A/RES/3318(XXIX). www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/ProtectionOfWomenAndChildren.aspxGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (1977a, June 8). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1). www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/ProtocolI.aspxGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (1977b, June 8). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 2). www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/ProtocolII.aspxGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (1979, December 18). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CEDAW.aspxGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2004, August 23). The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies: Report of the secretary-general. www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/2004%20report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2006, February 8). Study on the right to the truth. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/106/56/PDF/G0610656.pdf?OpenElementGoogle Scholar
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2014, April 9). OHCHR investigation on Sri Lanka. www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/OISL.aspx.Google Scholar
Olsen, T., Payne, L., & Reiter, A. (2010). The justice balance: When transitional justice improves human rights and democracy. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4), 980–1007.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. (1962). An alternative to war or surrender. Urbana, IL: University of Urbana Press.Google Scholar
Rettberg, A., & Ugarriza, J. E. (2016). Reconciliation: A comprehensive framework for empirical analysis. Security Dialogue, 47, 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, R. I., & Thompson, D. F. (2000). Truth v. justice: The morality of truth commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349–356.Google Scholar
Silove, D. (1999). The psychosocial effects of torture, mass human rights violations, and refugee trauma: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187(4), 200–207.Google Scholar
Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), 5–44.Google Scholar
Stein, D. J., Seedat, S., Kaminer, D., Moomal, H., Herman, A., Sonnega, J., & Williams, D. R. (2007). The impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on psychological distress and forgiveness in South Africa. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(6), 462–468.Google Scholar
Stover, E., & Weinstein, H. M. (2004). My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stromseth, J. E., Wippman, D., & Brooks, R. (2006). Can might make rights? Building the rule of law after military interventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N., & Lavik, N. J. (2000). Psychological aspects of human rights violations: The importance of justice and reconciliation. Nordic Journal of International Law, 69(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. K., & Lederach, J. P. (2014). Practicing peace: Psychological roots of transforming conflicts. Global Journal of Peace Research and Praxis, 1(1), 12–31.Google Scholar
Teitel, R. (2003). Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 69–94.Google Scholar
Theidon, K. (2012). Intimate enemies: Violence and reconciliation in Peru. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Theissen, G. (2008). Object of trust and hatred: Public attitudes toward the TRC. In Chapman, A. & van der Merwe, H. (Eds.), Truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Did the TRC deliver? (pp. 191–216). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Thoms, O. N. T., Ron, J., & Paris, R. (2008). The effects of transitional justice mechanisms: A summary of empirical research findings and implications for analysts and practitioners. Working paper for the Center for International Policy Studies, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Twose, G. (2010). Going beyond truth in reconciliation. Review of International Affairs, LXI(2), 41–70.Google Scholar
Twose, G., & Mahoney, C. (2015). The trouble with truth-telling: Preliminary reflections on truth and justice in post-war Liberia. Peace and Conflict Studies, 22(2), Article 1.Google Scholar
Unidad para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas (RUV). (2019, January 1). Registro Único de Víctimas: Red Nacional de Información. www.unidadvictimas.gov.co/es/registro-unico-de-victimas-ruv/37394Google Scholar
Valji, N. (2007). Gender justice and reconciliation. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
van der Merwe, H., & Chapman, A. (2008). Did the TRC deliver? In Chapman, A. & van der Merwe, H. (Eds.), Truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Did the TRC deliver? (pp. 241–279). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Villa-Vicencio, C. (2004). Reconciliation. In Villa-Vicencio, C. & Doxtader, E. (Eds.), Pieces of the puzzle: Keywords on reconciliation and transitional justice (pp. 3–9). Cape Town: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.Google Scholar
Villa-Vicencio, C., & Verwoerd, W. (Eds.). (2000). Looking back, reaching forward: Reflections on the truth and reconciliation commission of South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Warner, G. (2016). It’s the no. 1 country for women in politics – but not in daily life. National Public Radio. www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2016/07/29/487360094/invisibilia-no-one-thought-this-all-womans-debate-team-could-crush-it.Google Scholar
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010). Truth commissions and transitional societies: The impact on human rights and democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×