Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Foundations of Political Psychology
- Part II The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
- 11 Authoritarianism
- 12 A Political Psychology of Ethnocentrism
- 13 Collective Narcissism
- 14 Demographic Change, White Decline, and the Changing Nature of Racial Politics in Election Campaigns
- 15 Macro-diversity and Intergroup Attitudes
- 16 The Persistence of Gender in Campaigns and Elections
- 17 The Politics of Abortion, Pregnancy, and Motherhood
- 18 Religiosity and Openness to Authoritarian Governance
- 19 The Consequences of Moral Conviction in Politics
- 20 The Political Psychology of National Identity
- 21 The Political Dynamics of Immigration Opinion Worldwide
- 22 International and Individual Differences in Support for Human Rights
- Part III Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
- Part IV Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
- Index
- References
15 - Macro-diversity and Intergroup Attitudes
from Part II - The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Foundations of Political Psychology
- Part II The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
- 11 Authoritarianism
- 12 A Political Psychology of Ethnocentrism
- 13 Collective Narcissism
- 14 Demographic Change, White Decline, and the Changing Nature of Racial Politics in Election Campaigns
- 15 Macro-diversity and Intergroup Attitudes
- 16 The Persistence of Gender in Campaigns and Elections
- 17 The Politics of Abortion, Pregnancy, and Motherhood
- 18 Religiosity and Openness to Authoritarian Governance
- 19 The Consequences of Moral Conviction in Politics
- 20 The Political Psychology of National Identity
- 21 The Political Dynamics of Immigration Opinion Worldwide
- 22 International and Individual Differences in Support for Human Rights
- Part III Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
- Part IV Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
- Index
- References
Summary
Many Western societies are becoming increasingly ethnically diverse. In this chapter, we focus on whether diversity at a macro level (that is, diversity of individuals’ social contexts) is beneficial or disadvantageous for intergroup relations. We therefore review research in political and social psychology on the consequences of macro-diversity for majority members of the host societies, looking at social trust, intergroup attitudes, and political behaviour as the main outcome variables. First, we start by conceptualising macro-level diversity and outlining some methodological considerations. Next, we briefly review the evidence on the question whether ethnic diversity has positive or negative consequences for intergroup relations. We then focus on two potential psychological mechanisms explaining effects of increased macro-diversity on individual outcomes: perception of threat versus intergroup contact. Moreover, we discuss individual and contextual moderators of the relation between ethnic diversity and intergroup attitudes. Finally, we end this chapter by outlining future directions for research.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 243 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, M., & Knauss, S. (2012). Explaining membership in the British National Party: Multilevel analysis of contact and threat. European Sociological Review, 28(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blalock, H. M. Jr. (1957). Per cent non-white and discrimination in the South. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 677–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089197Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388607Google Scholar
Bobo, L. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5Google Scholar
Budescu, D. V., & Budescu, M. (2012). How to measure diversity when you must. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027129Google Scholar
Christ, O., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., et al. (2017). Advanced multilevel modeling for a science of groups: A short primer on multilevel structural equation modeling. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 21(3), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, M. A., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2018). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727860Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Haas, H., Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2020). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (6th ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dinesen, P. T., Schaeffer, M., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2020). Ethnic diversity and social trust: A narrative and meta-analytical review. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052918-020708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, P. T., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2015). Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 550–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415577989Google Scholar
Dinesen, P. T., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2018). Ethnic diversity and social trust: A critical review of the literature and suggestions for a research agenda. In Uslaner, E. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on social and political trust (pp. 175–204). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.13Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.xGoogle Scholar
Eurostat. (2004). European regional statistics reference guide. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fasel, N., Green, E. G. T., & Sarrasin, O. (2013). Facing cultural diversity: Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe. European Psychologist, 18(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. J. (2010). Angry white men: Individual and contextual predictors of support for the British National Party. Political Studies, 58(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.xGoogle Scholar
Green, E. G. T., Fasel, N., & Sarrasin, O. (2010). The more the merrier? The effects of type of cultural diversity on exclusionary immigration attitudes in Switzerland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2824Google Scholar
Green, E. G. T., Sarrasin, O., Baur, R., & Fasel, N. (2016). From stigmatized immigrants to radical right voting: A multilevel study on the role of threat and contact. Political Psychology, 37(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12290Google Scholar
Green, E. G. T., Visintin, E. P., & Sarrasin, O. (2018). From ethnic group boundary demarcation to deprovincialization: The interplay of immigrant presence and ideological climate. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 59(5–6), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715218801422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, E. G. T., Visintin, E. P., Sarrasin, O., & Hewstone, M. (2020). When integration policies shape the impact of intergroup contact on threat perceptions: A multilevel study across 20 European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimond, S., de la Sablonnière, R., & Nugier, A. (2014). Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 142–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.957578Google Scholar
Gundelach, B., & Manatschal, A. (2017). Ethnic diversity, social trust and the moderating role of subnational integration policy. Political Studies, 65(2), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716644613Google Scholar
Hewstone, M. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71(2), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12120Google Scholar
Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Hamberger, J., & Niens, U. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of ‘The Troubles’ in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00441.xGoogle Scholar
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Dovidio, J. F., Jiménez, T. R., & Schildkraut, D. J. (2018). Local policy proposals can bridge Latino and (most) white Americans’ response to immigration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(5), 945–950. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711293115Google Scholar
International Organisation for Migration. (2019). World migration report 2018. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/f45862f3-en.Google Scholar
Jones, J. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2018). Change, challenge, and prospects for a diversity paradigm in social psychology. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12(1), 7–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, R., & Schaeffer, M. (2013). De-composing diversity: In-group size and out-group entropy and their relationship to neighbourhood cohesion. Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Migration, Integration, Transnationalization, SP VI 2013-104. WZB Berlin Social Science Center.Google Scholar
Laurence, J., Schmid, K., Rae, J. R., & Hewstone, M. (2019). Prejudice, contact, and threat at the diversity-segregation nexus: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of how ethnic out-group size and segregation interrelate for inter-group relations. Social Forces, 97(3), 1029–1066. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy079Google Scholar
Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M., & Scheepers, P. (2002). Extreme right‐wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41(3), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00015Google Scholar
Lucassen, G., & Lubbers, M. (2012). Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threats. Comparative Political Studies, 45(5), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011427851Google Scholar
Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (2018). The emergence of contextual social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218756033Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751Google Scholar
Pottie‐Sherman, Y., & Wilkes, R. (2017). Does size really matter? On the relationship between immigrant group size and anti‐immigrant prejudice. International Migration Review, 51(1), 218–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12191Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty‐first century – The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 586–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelkoul, M., Scheepers, P., Tolsma, J., & Hagendoorn, L. (2011). Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and intergroup contact theory. European Sociological Review, 27(6), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, M. (2013). Can competing diversity indices inform us about why ethnic diversity erodes social cohesion? A test of five diversity indices in Germany. Social Science Research, 42(3), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.018Google Scholar
Schaeffer, M. (2014). Ethnic diversity and social cohesion: Immigration, ethnic fractionalization and potentials for civic action. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
Schlueter, E., & Scheepers, P. (2010). The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research, 39(2), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.006Google Scholar
Schlueter, E., & Wagner, U. (2008). Regional differences matter: Examining the dual influence of the regional size of the immigrant population on derogation of immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49(2–3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020815207088910Google Scholar
Schmid, K., Ramiah, A. A., & Hewstone, M. (2015). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956Google Scholar
Stein, R. M., Post, S. S., & Rinden, A. L. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024450Google Scholar
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., & Cairns, E. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325004Google Scholar
Van Assche, J., Asbrock, F., Dhont, K., & Roets, A. (2018). The diversity challenge for high and low authoritarians: Multilevel and longitudinal effects through intergroup contact and threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(8), 1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218764653Google Scholar
Van Assche, J., Roets, A., Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). Diversity and out-group attitudes in the Netherlands: The role of authoritarianism and social threat in the neighbourhood. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(9), 1414–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.876895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Assche, J., Roets, A., Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2016). The association between actual and perceived ethnic diversity: The moderating role of authoritarianism and implications for outgroup threat, anxiety, and mistrust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2211.Google Scholar
Van Assche, J., Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2019). Diverse reactions to ethnic diversity: The role of individual differences in authoritarianism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419857769Google Scholar
Van der Meer, T., & Tolsma, J. (2014). Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020). Cultural diversity and its implications for intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.010.Google Scholar
Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. (2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900406Google Scholar
Wagner, U., Christ, O., Wolf, H., et al. (2008). Social and political context effects on intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes. In Wagner, U., Tropp, L. R., Finchilescu, G., & Tredoux, C. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (Social Issues and Interventions. pp. 195–209). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444303117.ch13Google Scholar
Werts, H., Scheepers, P., & Lubbers, M. (2013). Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics, 14(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512469287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, B. E., & Webster, G. D. (2019). The relationships of intergroup ideologies to ethnic prejudice: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318761423Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by