Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:14:26.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Controversies in the Classification and Diagnosis of Personality Disorders

from Part II - Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2020

Carl W. Lejuez
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Kim L. Gratz
Affiliation:
University of Toledo, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Psychiatry faces the problem of multiple systems of classifying personality disorders, reflecting longstanding controversies as to whether dimensions or categories are the best way of understanding these conditions. The current options are a continuation of the use of categories, a purely dimensional system, or a hybrid model. Most PD research has focused on either borderline personality or antisocial personality. These categories describe severe psychopathology, and do not readily fit into a dimensional model. As it stands, research has focused on the diagnoses with those that are most associated with psychopathology and dysfunction. The choice among current alternatives is unclear. While the DSM-5 Section III alternative system attempts to draw on the best aspects of all models, it may be too complex for clinical use. Some are concerned that a more “scientific” but less user-friendly system could interfere with access to evidence-based treatments for BPD.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Dajani, N., Tralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 6281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Angst, J., & Merikangas, K. (1997). The depressive spectrum: Diagnostic classification and course. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 3139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beitz, K., & Bornstein, R. F. (2010). Dependent personality disorder. In Fisher, J. F. & Dononhue, W. T. (Eds.), Practitioner’s Guide to Evidence Based Psychotherapy (pp. 230237). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Binks, C. A., Fenton, M., McCarthy, L., Lee, T., Adams, C. E., & Duggan, C. (2006). Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Article CD005652].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Houts, R., Belsky, D. W., & Moffitt, T. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coid, J., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Antisocial personality disorder is on a continuum with psychopathy. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 426433.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (Eds.) (2013). Personality Disorders and the Five Factor Model of Personality (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 188207.Google Scholar
Esterberg, M. A., Goulding, S. M., & Walker, E. F. (2010). Cluster A personality disorders: Schizotypal, schizoid and paranoid personality disorders in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 515528.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet, 359(9306), 545550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M. B., Bhat, V., Adler, D., Dixon, L., & Goldman, B. (2014). How do clinicians actually use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in clinical practice and why we need to know more? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202, 841844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frances, A. (2013). Saving Normal. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gunderson, J. G., & Phillips, K. A. (1991). A current view of the interface between borderline personality disorder and depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 967975.Google Scholar
Gunderson, J. G., Stout, R. L., McGlashan, T. H., Shea, T., Morey, L. C., Grilo, C. M., … Skodol, A. E. (2011). Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: Psychopathology and function from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Archives of General Psychiatry68, 827837.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical constructAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology4, 217246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Current Opinion in Psychiatry9, 129132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpertz, S. C., Huuprich, S. K., Bohus, M., Chanen, A., Goodman, M., Mehlum, L., … Sharp, C. (2017). The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 577589.Google Scholar
Horwitz, A. V., & Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, A. V., & Wakefield, J. C. (2012). All We Have to Fear: Psychiatry’s Transformation of Natural Anxieties into Mental Disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., … Wang, P. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748751.Google Scholar
Jablensky, A. (2016). Psychiatric classifications: Validity and utility. World Psychiatry, 15, 2631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., & Bezdjian, S. (2009). Enhancing research and treatment of mental disorders with dimensional concepts: Toward DSM-V and ICD-11. World Psychiatry, 8, 306310.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 18791890.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, C. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477501.Google Scholar
Kupfer, D. J., & Regier, D. A. (2011). Neuroscience, clinical evidence, and the future of psychiatric classification in DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 172174.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., & McTeague, L. M. (2009). The anxiety disorder spectrum: Fear imagery, physiological reactivity, and differential diagnosis. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 22, 525.Google Scholar
Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 553556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livesley, W. J., Jang, K. L., & Vernon, P. A. (1998). Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 941948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., & Markon, K. E. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the personality inventory for DSM-5Psychological Assessment, 27, 11951210.Google Scholar
McArdle, P. (2008). Use and misuse of drugs and alcohol in adolescence. British Medical Journal, 337, 4650.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2009). Borderline Personality Disorder: Recognition and Management (NICE Clinical Guideline No. 78). Retrieved from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG78/Google Scholar
Novalis, F., Araujo, A., & Godinho, P. (2015). Historical roots of histrionic personality disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 14631467.Google Scholar
Olfson, M., Blanco, W., & Greenhill, L. L. (2013). Trends in office-based treatment of adults with stimulants in the United States. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74, 4350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, J. (2012). The Bipolar Spectrum: Diagnosis or Fad? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paris, J. (2013). Anatomy of a debacle: Commentary on “Seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM- 5.” Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, & Treatment, 4, 377378.Google Scholar
Paris, J., Bhat, V., & Thombs, B. (2015). Is adult ADHD being over-diagnosed? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 324328.Google Scholar
Paris, J., Gunderson, J. G., & Weinberg, I. (2007). The interface between borderline personality disorder and bipolar spectrum disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 145154.Google Scholar
Paris, J., & Kirmayer, L. (2016). The NIMH research domain criteria: A bridge too far. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 204, 2632.Google Scholar
Potuzak, M., Ravichandran, C., Lewandowski, K. E., Ongur, D., & Cohen, B. (2014). Categorical vs dimensional classifications of psychotic disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53, 11181129.Google Scholar
Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Czajkowski, N., Torgersen, S., Neale, M. C., Orstavki, R. E., & Kendler, K. S. (2007). The relationship between avoidant personality disorder and social phobia: A population-based twin study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 17221728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossell, D. R., Futterman, S. E., McMaster, A., & Siever, L. J. (2014). Schizotypal personality disorder: A current review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16, 452460.Google Scholar
Schroeder, K., Fisher, H. L., & Schafer, I. (2013). Psychotic symptoms in patients with borderline personality disorder: Prevalence and clinical management. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26, 113119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, K. R. (2016). Personality disorders in DSM-5: A commentary on the perceived process and outcome of the proposal of the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 24, 309310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P., & Alexander, J. (1979). Classificiation of personality disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 163167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrer, P., Crawford, M., Mulder, R., & Blashfield, R. (2011). The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Personality and Mental Health, 5, 246259.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A. (2007). Dimensional models of personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 6, 7983.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (1992). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th revision, ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., & First, M. B. (2015). Transitioning to a dimensional model of personality disorder in DSM 5.1 and beyond. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, 6672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanarini, M. C. (2009). Psychotherapy of borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 120, 3741.Google Scholar
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Dubo, E. D.. Sickel, A. E., Trikha, A., & Levin, A. (1998). Axis I comorbidity of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 17331739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M., & Mattia, J. (1999). Differences between clinical and research practices in diagnosing borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 15701574.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelminski, I. (2005). The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 19111918.Google Scholar
Zoccolillo, M., Pickles, A., Quinton, D., & Rutter, M. (1992). The outcome of childhood conduct disorder: Implications for defining adult personality disorder and conduct disorder. Psychological Medicine, 22, 971986.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×