Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:27:03.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Commitment Processes in Personal Relationships

from Part VIII - Relational Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

By
Christopher R. Agnew  and
Laura E. VanderDrift
Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti  and
Daniel Perlman
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Get access

Summary

Why do people stay in a personal relationship? For decades, scholars have attempted to answer this deceptively simple question. In doing so, they have often invoked the concept of commitment. Relationship commitment is a core construct within relationship science, and theorizing and research on it, including its antecedents and consequences, has been active for years. This chapter reviews what is known currently about commitment processes, including why it remains a particularly important construct in understanding relationships today. We begin by providing basic conceptualizations offered for the construct, highlighting why the construct seems of importance given shifts in how people relate with one another at the current time. We then review particularly generative extant theoretical models of commitment (including the Cohesiveness Model, the Tripartite Model, and the Investment Model of Commitment Processes), before turning to a detailed review of known antecedents of commitment. We also review known consequences of commitment (including cognitive, affective and behavioral consequences). We end the chapter by considering topics for potential future exploration.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 437 - 448
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, C. R. (2009). Commitment, theories and typologies. In Reis, H. T. & Sprecher, S. K. (eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 245–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (2000). Cognitive interdependence and the experience of relationship loss. In Harvey, J. H. & Miller, E. D. (eds.), Loss and trauma: General and close relationship perspectives (pp. 385–398). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (2014, July). Relationship receptivity: Commitment in a changing world. Invited keynote address presented at the 2014 International Association of Relationship Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (2016, July). Relationship receptivity and stability: Being ready for commitment. Paper presented at the 2016 International Association of Relationship Research Conference, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Arriaga, X. B., & Wilson, J. E. (2008). Committed to what? Using the Bases of Relational Commitment Model to understand continuity and changes in social relationships. In Forgas, J. P. & Fitness, J. (eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective and motivational processes (pp. 147–164). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Hoffman, A. M., Lehmiller, J. J., & Duncan, N. T. (2007). From the interpersonal to the international: Understanding commitment to the War on Terror. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1559–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly-formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Reed, J. T., Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. R., McNulty, J. K., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2017). Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 700–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, L. E., Eastwood, M. M., Sprenkle, D. H., & Smith, E. (1991). An exploratory analysis of the construct of leavers versus left as it relates to Levinger’s social exchange theory of attractions, barriers, and alternative attractions. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 15, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, S. E., Wilson, K. M., & Agnew, C. R. (2013). Committed to Oprah, Homer, or House: Using the investment model to understand parasocial relationships. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickman, P., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Abbey, A. (1987). The development of commitment. In Brickman, P. (ed.) Commitment, conflict, and caring (pp. 145–221). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brown, S., Manning, W. D. & Payne, K. K. (2015). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0192513X15622236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, K. T., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1996). Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1244–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrere, S., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J. A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 42–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, A. M., Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Monner, L. J. (2013). Investigating the interface of the investment model and adult attachment theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 661–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics 10. Retrieved online: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_252.pdf [PDF – 3.8 Mb]Google Scholar
Cheung, I., Campbell, L., LeBel, E., … Yong, J. C. (2016). Registered Replication Report: Study 1 from Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 750–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connolly, S., & Gregory, M. (2009). The PT pay penalty: Earnings trajectories of British women. Oxford Economic Papers, 61, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailey, R. M., Hampel, A. D., & Roberts, J. B. (2010). Relational maintenance in on-again/off-again relationships: An assessment of how relational maintenance, uncertainty, and commitment vary by relationship type and status. Communication Monographs, 77, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dardis, C. M., Kelley, E. L., Edwards, K. M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2013). A mixed-methodological examination of investment model variables among abused and nonabused college women. Journal of American College Health, 61, 36–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dix, E. L., Emery, L. F., & Le, B. (2014). Committed to the honor code: An investment model analysis of academic integrity. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E. (2004). Commitment as a superordinate goal in romantic relationships. (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 11B (ISBN 9780496151493).Google Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2004). Subjective norms and the prediction of relationship state and fate. Personal Relationships, 11, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E., & Le, B. (2005). Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and prediction of relationship persistence, accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice. Personal Relationships, 12, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T.-F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20, 546–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, M. A., & Harvey, J. H. (2005). Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkenauer, C., Wijngaards de Meij, L., Reis, H. T., & Rusbult, C. E. (2010). The importance of seeing what is not there: A quasi-signal detection analysis of positive and negative behavior in newlywed couples. Personal Relationships, 17, 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & VanDellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, W., Lorenz, B., & Kempe, M. (2014). An extended search for generic consumer-brand relationships. Psychology and Marketing, 31, 976–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gere, J., MacDonald, G., Joel, S., Spielmann, S. S., & Impett, E. A. (2013). The independent contributions of social reward and threat perceptions to romantic commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 961–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gettings, P. E., & Wilson, S. R. (2014). Examining commitment and relational maintenance in formal youth mentoring relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 1089–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639–1652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hui, C., Finkel, E. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., Kumashiro, M., & Hofmann, W. (2014). The Manhattan Effect: When relationship commitment fails to promote support for partners’ interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 546–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioerger, M., Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2016). Patient–physician commitment and continuity of care: An investment model analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Jackson, B., Gucciardi, D., & Dimmock, J. A. (2014). Toward a multidimensional model of athletes’ commitment to coach–athlete relationships and interdependent sport teams: A substantive-methodological synergy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36, 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. Sociological Quarterly, 14, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In Jones, W. H. & Perlman, D. W. (eds.) Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 117–143). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Horton, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M. (2013). Adult children’s relationships with married parents, divorced parents, and stepparents: Biology, marriage, or residence? Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1181–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1983). Love and commitment. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (eds.) Close relationships (pp. 265–312). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Gouin, J. P., & Hantsoo, L. V. (2010). Close relationships, inflammation, and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knopp, K. C., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J. (2015). Stuck on you: How dedication moderates the way constraints feel. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurkek, L. A. (2008). A general model of relationship commitment: Evidence from same-sex partners. Personal Relationships, 15, 391–405.Google Scholar
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J. (2010). Differences in relationship investments between gay and heterosexual men. Personal Relationships, 17, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J., & Konkel, K. E. (2013). Commitment to the GLBT community: An investment model analysis of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr. (2016). The forecast model of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinger, G. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinger, G. (1976). A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinger, G. (1999). Duty toward whom? Reconsidering attractions and barriers as determinants of commitment in a relationship. In Adams, J. M. & Jones, W. H. (eds). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 37–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mercer, C. H., Jones, K. G., Johnson, A. M., Lewis, R., Mitchell, K. R., Gravningen, K., … Estcourt, C. S. (2017). How can we objectively categorise partnership type? A novel classification of population survey data to inform epidemiological research and clinical practice. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. L., Bellavia, G. M., Rose, P., & Griffin, D. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2015). Maintaining mutual commitment in the face of risk. Current Opinions in Psychology, 1, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, S. A., & Bryant, L. E. (2008). The use of behavioral indicators of sibling commitment among emerging adults. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odrowska, A. M., & Massar, K. (2014). Predicting guild commitment in World of Warcraft with the investment model of commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A. L., & Cashwell, C. S. (2013). Moral commitment in intimate committed relationships: A conceptualization from cohabiting same-sex and opposite-sex partners. Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2003). Genuine giving or selfish sacrifice? The role of commitment and cost level upon willingness to sacrifice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, A. Jr. (2008). An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An actor–partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relational maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 943–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robles, T. R., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, D., & Lopes, D. (2013). The Investment Model Scale (IMS): Further studies on construct validation and development of a shorter version (IMS-S). Journal of General Psychology, 140, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, D. F. L., & Lopes, D. M. F. (2015). Validating the measurement of components of commitment in a Portuguese sample. Social Indicators Research, 121, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The Investment Model of Commitment Processes. In van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Coolsen, M. K., Kirchner, J. L., & Clarke, J. (2006). Commitment. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (eds.) Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 615–635). New York, NY: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Farrell, D. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1230–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, N., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Broadening the investment model: An intensive longitudinal study on attachment and perceived partner responsiveness in commitment dynamics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomonson, W. L. (2015). Should I stay or should I go? Client factors affecting relationship commitment in the consultative relationship. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Metts, S., Fehr, B., & Vanni, D. (1998). Factors associated with distress following the breakup of a close relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. H. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of relationship initiation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada (2016). The rise of the dual earner family with children. Retrieved from: www5.statcan.gc.ca/olc-cel/olc.action?ObjId=11–630-X2016005&ObjType=46Google Scholar
Strachman, A., & Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance relationship commitment. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K., & Agnew, C. R. (2016). Ease of retrieval effects on relationship commitment: The role of future plans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, K., Agnew, C. R., VanderDrift, L. E., & Harvey, S. M. (2015). Committed to us: Predicting relationship closeness following non-marital romantic relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 456–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2016). Running on empty: Measuring psychological dependence in close relationships devoid of satisfaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Tang, C-Y. (2012). Routine housework and tripartite marital commitment. Personal Relationships, 19, 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Troiano, R. P., Berrigan, D., Dodd, K. W., Mâsse, L. C., Tilert, T., & McDowell, M. (2008). Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Census Bureau (2015). Current Population Survey, March and Annual Social and Economic Supplements, 2015 and earlier. Retrieved from www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/marital.htmlGoogle Scholar
US Department of Labor Statistics (2015). Employment characteristics of families survey. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.nr0.htmGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F., & Steemers, G. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanderDrift, L. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2014). Relational consequences of personal goal pursuits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 927–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C. R., & Wilson, J. E. (2014). Spanish version of the Investment Model Scale. Personal Relationships, 21, 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., Lehmiller, J. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2012). Commitment in friends with benefits relationships: Implications for relational change and safer sex practices. Personal Relationships, 19, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., Lewandowski, G. W., & Agnew, C. R. (2011). Reduced self-expansion in current romance and interest in relationship alternatives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., Wilson, J. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2013). On the benefits of valuing being friends for non-marital romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesselmann, E. D., VanderDrift, L. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2016). Religious commitment: An interdependence approach. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yovetich, N. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×