Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T15:07:45.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Moral Character

from Part I - Building Blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2025

By
Geoffrey P. Goodwin  and
Justin F. Landy
Edited by
Bertram Malle  and
Philip Robbins
Bertram Malle
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Philip Robbins
Affiliation:
University of Missouri
Get access

Summary

This chapter of the handbook reviews empirical research on moral character, which has only recently attained a prominent role in psychology, in contrast to long traditions in ethics and education. A person’s moral character comprises their dispositions to think, feel, and act morally, and these dispositions are cross-situationally and temporally fairly consistent. Against a long-standing belief in psychology that the personality disposition of warmth most strongly influences people’s impressions of one another, the evidence suggests that moral character occupies this central position. Moral character exerts its influence on impressions quite independently of other personality traits, and it features prominently in people’s representations of their own personality as well. Moral character is also a central element in a person’s perceived identity – who the person is perceived to be “deep down.” The authors close by charting some of the features from which people infer another’s moral character, including their actions but also, critically, their mental states such as their goals and intentions.

Keywords

moral characterperson perceptionimpression formationpersonalityidentitywarmthintentions
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology , pp. 33 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abele, A. E., & Brack, S. (2013). Preference for other persons’ traits is dependent on the kind of social relationship. Social Psychology, 44(2), 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44(2), 61–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. M. (2006). A theory of virtue. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amos, C., Zhang, L., & Read, D. (2019). Hardworking as a heuristic for moral character: Why we attribute moral values to those who work hard and its implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 1047–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 1230–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsieker, H. B., Leslie, L. M., Constantine, V. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1214–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2018). Discipline and desire: On the relative importance of willpower and purity in signaling virtue. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleidorn, W., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2015). Virtues in action – The new look of character traits. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 700–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bocian, K., Baryla, W., Kulesza, W. M., Schnall, S., & Wojciszke, B. (2018). The mere liking effect: Attitudinal influences on attributions of moral character. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollich, K. L., Doris, J. M., Vazire, S., Raison, C. L., Jackson, J. J., & Mehl, M. R. (2016). Eavesdropping on character: Assessing everyday moral behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Goodwin, G. P. (2021). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. In Gawronski, B. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 187–262). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celniker, J., Gregory, A., Koo, H., Piff, P. K., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. (2022). The moralization of unproductive effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. B., & Rozin, P. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 697–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2013). Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 816–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., & Li, N. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 208–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critcher, C. R., Helzer, E. G., & Tannenbaum, D. (2020). Moral character evaluation: Testing another’s moral-cognitive machinery. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article 103906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critcher, C. R., Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2013). How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, M. J., Everett, J. A. C., Gill, M., & Siegel, J. Z. (2021). The relational logic of moral inference. In Gawronski, B. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 1–64). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, D. E., Hook, H. N., Worthington, E. L. Jr, Van Tongeren, D. R., Gartner, A. L.,Jennings, D. J. II, & Emmons, R. A. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doris, J. M. (1998). Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs, 32(4), 504–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Jayawickreme, E., Helzer, E. G., Hartley, A. G., & Meidl, P. (2015). Personality science and the foundations of character. In Miller, C. B., Furr, R. M., Knobel, A., & Fleeson, W. (Eds.), Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology (pp. 41–71). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., & Helzer, E. G. (2014). Character: The prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(4), 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gert, B. (2004). Common morality: Deciding what to do. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B. (2005). Morality: Its nature and justification (revised ed.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B., & Gert, J. (2020). The definition of morality. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/morality-definition/Google Scholar
Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Moral character in person perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromet, D. M., Goodwin, G. P., & Goodman, R. A. (2016). Pleasure from another’s pain: The influence of a target’s hedonic states on attributions of immorality and evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(8), 1077–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, A. G., Furr, R. M., Helzer, E. G., Jayawickreme, E., Velasquez, K. R., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 648–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: Vol. 1. Studies in deceit. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heiphetz, L., Strohminger, N., Gelman, S., & Young, L. (2018). Who am I? The role of moral beliefs in children’s and adults’ understanding of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiphetz, L., Strohminger, N., & Young, L. (2017). The role of moral beliefs, memories, and preferences in representations of identity. Cognitive Science, 41(3), 744–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, E. G., & Critcher, C. R. (2018). What do we evaluate when we evaluate moral character? In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 99–107). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Helzer, E. G., Furr, R. M., Hawkins, A., Barranti, M., Blackie, L. E., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Agreement on the perception of moral character. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1698–1710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, E. G., Jayawickreme, E., & Furr, R. M. (2018). Moral character: Current insights and future directions. In Zeigler-Still, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Vol. 2. Origins of individual and personality differences (pp. 278–300). SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirozawa, P. Y., Karasawa, M., & Matsuo, A. (2020). Intention matters to make you (im)moral: Positive-negative asymmetry in moral character evaluations. Journal of Social Psychology, 160(4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J. S. (2017). In a moral dilemma, choose the one you love: Impartial actors are seen as less moral than partial ones. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(3), 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2018). Virtue ethics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/Google Scholar
Judd, C., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). The innuendo effect: Hearing the positive but inferring the negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupperman, J. J. (1991). Character. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landy, J., Piazza, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2016). When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1272–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, J. F., Piazza, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2018). Morality traits still dominate in forming impressions of others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25), Article E5636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, J. F., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2018). Morality is personal. In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 121–132). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lapsley, D. K., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity, 1(4), 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louden, R. B. (1984). On some vices of virtue ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(3), 227–236.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. W., & Cushman, F. (2015). To punish or to leave: Distinct cognitive processes underlie partner control and partner choice behaviors. PLoS ONE, 10(4), Article e0125193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J. W., Leddy, K., Young, L., & McAuliffe, K. (2022). An earlier role for intent in children’s partner choice versus punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(3), 597–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J.-A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, J. (1979). Virtue and reason. The Monist, 62(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meindl, P., Jayawickreme, E., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2015). A foundation beam for studying morality from a personological point of view: Are individual differences in moral behaviors and thoughts consistent? Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnikoff, D. E., & Bailey, A. H. (2018). Preferences for moral vs. immoral traits are conditional. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(4), E592–E600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2003). Social psychology and virtue ethics. Journal of Ethics, 7(4), 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooijman, M., Meindl, P., Oyserman, D., Monterosso, J., Dehghani, M., Doris, J. M., & Graham, J. (2018). Resisting temptation for the good of the group: Binding moral values and the moralization of self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, I. (1998). Gordon Allport, character, and the “culture of personality,” 1897–1937. History of Psychology, 1(1), 52–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peabody, D. (1984). Personality dimensions through trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, J., Goodwin, G. P., & Rozin, P, & Royzman, E. B. (2014). When a virtue is not a virtue: Conditional virtues in moral evaluation. Social Cognition, 32(6), 528–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizarro, D. A., & Tannebaum, D. (2011). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, G. D., & Coovert, M. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, G. D., Kumar, S., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Trafimow, D. (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 789–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeder, G. D., & Spores, J. M. (1983). The attribution of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 736–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riskey, D. R., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). Compensatory effects in moral judgment: Two rights don’t make up for a wrong. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(1), 171–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, S., & Olshan, K. (1970). Evaluative and descriptive aspects in personality perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(4), 619–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royzman, E. B. & Hagan, J. P. (2017). The shadow and the tree: Inference and transformation of content in psychology of moral judgment. In Bonnefon, J.-F. & Tremoliere, B. (Eds.), Moral inferences (pp. 56–74). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaumberg, R. L., & Mullen, E. (2017). From incidental harms to moral elevation: The positive effect of experiencing unintentional, uncontrollable, and unavoidable harms on perceived moral character. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M. D., & Taylor, S. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, J. Z., Mathys, C., Rutledge, R. B., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). Beliefs about bad people are volatile. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 750–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slote, M. A. (1983). Goods and virtues. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 141(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2015). Neurodegeneration and identity. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1468–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2020). Do people want to be more moral? Psychological Science, 31(3), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, L. J., & Hennig, K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 629–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, L. J., & Pitts, R. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1251–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojciszke, B., Dowhyluk, M., & Jaworski, M. (1998). Moral and competence-related traits: How do they differ? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 29(4), 283–294.Google Scholar
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Steward, N., & Joseph, S. (2008). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×