Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Modern Moral Psychology
- Part I Building Blocks
- Part II Thinking and Feeling
- Part III Behavior
- Part IV Origins, Development, and Variation
- Part V Applications and Extensions
- Index
- References
Part I - Building Blocks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 February 2025
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Modern Moral Psychology
- Part I Building Blocks
- Part II Thinking and Feeling
- Part III Behavior
- Part IV Origins, Development, and Variation
- Part V Applications and Extensions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology , pp. 31 - 150Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
References
Abele, A. E., & Brack, S. (2013). Preference for other persons’ traits is dependent on the kind of social relationship. Social Psychology, 44(2), 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44(2), 61–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amos, C., Zhang, L., & Read, D. (2019). Hardworking as a heuristic for moral character: Why we attribute moral values to those who work hard and its implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 1047–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 1230–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsieker, H. B., Leslie, L. M., Constantine, V. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1214–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2018). Discipline and desire: On the relative importance of willpower and purity in signaling virtue. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleidorn, W., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2015). Virtues in action – The new look of character traits. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 700–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bocian, K., Baryla, W., Kulesza, W. M., Schnall, S., & Wojciszke, B. (2018). The mere liking effect: Attitudinal influences on attributions of moral character. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollich, K. L., Doris, J. M., Vazire, S., Raison, C. L., Jackson, J. J., & Mehl, M. R. (2016). Eavesdropping on character: Assessing everyday moral behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Goodwin, G. P. (2021). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. In Gawronski, B. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 187–262). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celniker, J., Gregory, A., Koo, H., Piff, P. K., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. (2022). The moralization of unproductive effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. B., & Rozin, P. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 697–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2013). Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 816–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., & Li, N. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 208–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critcher, C. R., Helzer, E. G., & Tannenbaum, D. (2020). Moral character evaluation: Testing another’s moral-cognitive machinery. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article 103906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critcher, C. R., Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2013). How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, M. J., Everett, J. A. C., Gill, M., & Siegel, J. Z. (2021). The relational logic of moral inference. In Gawronski, B. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 1–64). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, D. E., Hook, H. N., Worthington, E. L. Jr, Van Tongeren, D. R., Gartner, A. L.,Jennings, D. J. II, & Emmons, R. A. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doris, J. M. (1998). Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs, 32(4), 504–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Jayawickreme, E., Helzer, E. G., Hartley, A. G., & Meidl, P. (2015). Personality science and the foundations of character. In Miller, C. B., Furr, R. M., Knobel, A., & Fleeson, W. (Eds.), Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology (pp. 41–71). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., & Helzer, E. G. (2014). Character: The prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(4), 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B. (2004). Common morality: Deciding what to do. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B. (2005). Morality: Its nature and justification (revised ed.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B., & Gert, J. (2020). The definition of morality. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/morality-definition/Google Scholar
Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Moral character in person perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromet, D. M., Goodwin, G. P., & Goodman, R. A. (2016). Pleasure from another’s pain: The influence of a target’s hedonic states on attributions of immorality and evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(8), 1077–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, A. G., Furr, R. M., Helzer, E. G., Jayawickreme, E., Velasquez, K. R., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 648–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: Vol. 1. Studies in deceit. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heiphetz, L., Strohminger, N., Gelman, S., & Young, L. (2018). Who am I? The role of moral beliefs in children’s and adults’ understanding of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiphetz, L., Strohminger, N., & Young, L. (2017). The role of moral beliefs, memories, and preferences in representations of identity. Cognitive Science, 41(3), 744–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, E. G., & Critcher, C. R. (2018). What do we evaluate when we evaluate moral character? In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 99–107). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Helzer, E. G., Furr, R. M., Hawkins, A., Barranti, M., Blackie, L. E., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Agreement on the perception of moral character. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1698–1710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, E. G., Jayawickreme, E., & Furr, R. M. (2018). Moral character: Current insights and future directions. In Zeigler-Still, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Vol. 2. Origins of individual and personality differences (pp. 278–300). SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirozawa, P. Y., Karasawa, M., & Matsuo, A. (2020). Intention matters to make you (im)moral: Positive-negative asymmetry in moral character evaluations. Journal of Social Psychology, 160(4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J. S. (2017). In a moral dilemma, choose the one you love: Impartial actors are seen as less moral than partial ones. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(3), 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2018). Virtue ethics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/Google Scholar
Judd, C., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). The innuendo effect: Hearing the positive but inferring the negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, J., Piazza, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2016). When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1272–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, J. F., Piazza, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2018). Morality traits still dominate in forming impressions of others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25), Article E5636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, J. F., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2018). Morality is personal. In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 121–132). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lapsley, D. K., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity, 1(4), 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louden, R. B. (1984). On some vices of virtue ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(3), 227–236.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. W., & Cushman, F. (2015). To punish or to leave: Distinct cognitive processes underlie partner control and partner choice behaviors. PLoS ONE, 10(4), Article e0125193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J. W., Leddy, K., Young, L., & McAuliffe, K. (2022). An earlier role for intent in children’s partner choice versus punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(3), 597–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J.-A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meindl, P., Jayawickreme, E., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2015). A foundation beam for studying morality from a personological point of view: Are individual differences in moral behaviors and thoughts consistent? Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnikoff, D. E., & Bailey, A. H. (2018). Preferences for moral vs. immoral traits are conditional. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(4), E592–E600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, C. (2003). Social psychology and virtue ethics. Journal of Ethics, 7(4), 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooijman, M., Meindl, P., Oyserman, D., Monterosso, J., Dehghani, M., Doris, J. M., & Graham, J. (2018). Resisting temptation for the good of the group: Binding moral values and the moralization of self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, I. (1998). Gordon Allport, character, and the “culture of personality,” 1897–1937. History of Psychology, 1(1), 52–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peabody, D. (1984). Personality dimensions through trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, J., Goodwin, G. P., & Rozin, P, & Royzman, E. B. (2014). When a virtue is not a virtue: Conditional virtues in moral evaluation. Social Cognition, 32(6), 528–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizarro, D. A., & Tannebaum, D. (2011). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, G. D., & Coovert, M. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, G. D., Kumar, S., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Trafimow, D. (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 789–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeder, G. D., & Spores, J. M. (1983). The attribution of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 736–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riskey, D. R., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). Compensatory effects in moral judgment: Two rights don’t make up for a wrong. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(1), 171–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, S., & Olshan, K. (1970). Evaluative and descriptive aspects in personality perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(4), 619–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royzman, E. B. & Hagan, J. P. (2017). The shadow and the tree: Inference and transformation of content in psychology of moral judgment. In Bonnefon, J.-F. & Tremoliere, B. (Eds.), Moral inferences (pp. 56–74). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaumberg, R. L., & Mullen, E. (2017). From incidental harms to moral elevation: The positive effect of experiencing unintentional, uncontrollable, and unavoidable harms on perceived moral character. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M. D., & Taylor, S. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, J. Z., Mathys, C., Rutledge, R. B., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). Beliefs about bad people are volatile. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 750–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 141(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2015). Neurodegeneration and identity. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1468–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, J., & Goodwin, G. P. (2020). Do people want to be more moral? Psychological Science, 31(3), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, L. J., & Hennig, K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 629–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, L. J., & Pitts, R. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1251–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojciszke, B., Dowhyluk, M., & Jaworski, M. (1998). Moral and competence-related traits: How do they differ? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 29(4), 283–294.Google Scholar
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Steward, N., & Joseph, S. (2008). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Aharoni, E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Kiehl, K. A. (2012). Can psychopathic offenders discern moral wrongs? A new look at the moral/conventional distinction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(2), 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharoni, E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Kiehl, K. A. (2014). What’s wrong? Moral understanding in psychopathic offenders. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barger, B., & Derryberry, W. P. (2013). Do negative mood states impact moral reasoning? Journal of Moral Education, 42(4), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoz, S., Artiges, E., Van De Moortele, P.-F., Poline, J.-B., Rouquette, S., Consoli, S. M., & Martinot, J.-L. (2002). Effect of impaired recognition and expression of emotions on frontocingulate cortices: An fMRI study of men with alexithymia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(6), 961–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björnsson, G., Eriksson, J., Strandberg, C., Olidner, R., & Björklund, F. (2015). Motivational internalism and folk intuitions. Philosophical Psychology, 28(5), 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1998). Ruling passions: A theory of practical reasoning. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, R. (1997). Moral reasoning and the child with psychopathic tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (Ed.), Essays on moral realism (pp. 181–228). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cholbi, M. (2006). Belief attribution and the falsification of motive internalism. Philosophical Psychology, 19(5), 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. (2018). Realist-expressivism and the fundamental role of normative belief. Philosophical Studies, 175(6), 1333–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusimano, C., Thapa, S., & Malle, B. F. (2017). Judgment before emotion: People access moral evaluations faster than affective states. In Gunzelmann, G., Howes, A., Tenbrink, T., & Davelaar, E. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1848–1853). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Damasio, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioral Brain Research, 41, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreier, J. (2015). Another world. In Smith, R. N. & Johnson, M. (Eds.), Passions and projections: Themes from the philosophy of Simon Blackburn (pp. 155–171). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamez-Djokic, M., & Molden, D. (2016). Beyond affective influences on deontological moral judgment: The role of motivations for prevention in the moral condemnation of harm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1522–1537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2018). Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Emotion, 18(7), 989–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgment. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2016). No absolutism here: Harm predicts moral judgment 30× better than disgust–commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L., Engell, A., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), Article 5537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J., Björklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason [Unpublished manuscript. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d415/e7fa2c2df922dac194441516a509ba5eb7ec.pdf]. University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Heekeren, H. R., Wartenburger, I., Schmidt, H., Schwintowski, H.-P., & Villringer, A. (2003). An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making. NeuroReport, 14(9), 1215–1219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hieronymi, P. (2005). The wrong kind of reason. Journal of Philosophy, 102(9), 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. (2008). What neuroscience can (and cannot) contribute to metaethics. In Sinnot-Armstrong, W. (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 371–394). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Stich, S., Haley, K., Eng, S., & Fessler, D. (2007). Harm, affect, and the moral-conventional distinction. Mind & Language, 22, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature, 446, 908–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1986). Skepticism about practical reason. Journal of Philosophy, 83(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 518–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, S. (2017a). In defense of practical reasons for belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95(3), 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, S. (2017b). Defending internalists from acquired sociopaths. Philosophical Psychology, 30(7), 878–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, B., & Schwenkler, J. (2018). Intending is believing: A defense of strong cognitivism. Analytic Philosophy, 59(3), 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Bramati, I. E., & Grafman, J. (2002). Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage, 16(3, Part A), 696–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, S. (2002). How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral? The Monist, 85(2), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. (2004). Sentimental rules: On the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan, K., Wager, T., Taylor, S., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16(2), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, J. (2015). An empirical case for motivational internalism. In Strandberg, C., Björklund, F., Björnsson, G., Eriksson, J., & Olinder, R. F. (Eds.), Motivational internalism (pp. 61–84). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of “meaning.” In Putnam, H., Philosophical papers (pp. 215–271). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. (2003). Are ethical judgments intrinsically motivational? Lessons from ‘acquired sociopathy.’ Philosophical Psychology, 16(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. (2009). How to be a cognitivist about practical reason. Oxford Studies in Meta-Ethics, 4, 243–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royzman, E. B., Kim, K., & Leeman, R. F. (2015). The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saver, J., & Damasio, A. (1991). Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1241–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, T., Roskies, A., & Nichols, S. (2010). Moral motivation. In Doris, J. and The Moral Psychology Research Group (Eds.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 72–110). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueler, G. F. (2009). The Humean theory of motivation rejected. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N. (2006). A new argument for evidentialism. Philosophical Quarterly, 56(225), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinhababu, N. (2009). The Humean theory of motivation reformulated and defended. Philosophical Review, 118, 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (1981). Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52, 1333–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (2007). The truth about internalism. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 3. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 207–215). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, T., Zaal, M. P., & Skitka, L. J. (2016). Moralized rationality: Relying on logic and evidence in the formation and evaluation of belief can be seen as a moral issue. PLoS ONE, 11(11), Article e0166332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandberg, C., & Björklund, F. (2013). Is moral internalism supported by folk intuitions? Philosophical Psychology, 26(3), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Roojen, M. (2018). Moral cognitivism vs. non-cognitivism. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-cognitivism.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2006). Moral motivation. In Dreier, J. (Ed.), Contemporary debates in moral theory (pp. 182–195). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Way, J. (2016). Two arguments for evidentialism. Philosophical Quarterly, 66(265), 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Álvarez-Benjumea, A., & Winter, F. (2018). Normative change and culture of hate: An experiment in online environments. European Sociological Review, 34(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J., Nikiforakis, N., & Siegenthaler, S. (2021). Predicting social tipping and norm change in controlled experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(16), Article e201489118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, K. (2020). Naïve normativity: The social foundation of moral cognition. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 6(1), 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrighetto, G., Brandts, J., Conte, R., Sabater-Mir, J., Solaz, H., & Villatoro, D. (2013). Punish and voice: Punishment enhances cooperation when combined with norm-signalling. PLoS ONE, 8(6), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrighetto, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2013). Norm compliance: The prescriptive power of normative actions. PARADIGMI, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrighetto, G., & Vriens, E. (2022). A research agenda for the study of social norm change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380, Article 20200411.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balafoutas, L., Nikiforakis, N., & Rockenbach, B. (2014). Direct and indirect punishment among strangers in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(45), 15924–15927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkowitz, A. D. (2010). Fostering health norms to prevent violence and abuse: The social norms approach. In Kaufman, K. (Ed.), The prevention of sexual violence: A practitioner’s sourcebook (pp. 147–171). NEARI Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2017). Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A. (2010). Behaving as expected: Public information and fairness norms. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C., Dimant, E., Gächter, S., & Nosenzo, D. (2022). Social proximity and the erosion of norm compliance. Games and Economic Behavior, 132, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C., & Funcke, A. (2018). Norm change: Trendsetters and social structure. Social Research, 85(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C., Lindemans, J. W., & Jiang, T. (2014). A structured approach to a diagnostic of collective practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicchieri, C., & Xiao, E. (2009). Do the right thing but only if others do so. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 291–208.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (2010). Social norms or social preferences?. Mind & Society, 9, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., & Bowles, S. (2010). Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science, 328(5978), 617–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bursztyn, L., González, A. L., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2020). Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in Saudi Arabia. American Economic Review, 110(10), 2997–3029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelfranchi, C. (1998). Simulating with cognitive agents: The importance of cognitive emergence. In Sichman, J. S., Conte, R., & Gilbert, N. (Eds.), Multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation: First international workshop MABS ’98 (pp. 26–44). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castioni, P., Andrighetto, G., Gallotti, R., Polizzi, E., & De Domenico, M. (2022). The voice of few, the opinions of many: Evidence of social biases in Twitter COVID-19 fake news sharing. Royal Society Open Science, 9(220716), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centola, D. (2021b). Influencers, backfire effects, and the power of the periphery. In Small, M. L. & Perry, B. L. (Eds.), Personal networks (1st ed., pp. 73–86). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D., & Baronchelli, A. (2018). Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science, 360(6393), 1116–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaurand, N., & Brauer, M. (2008). What determines social control? People’s reactions to counternormative behaviors in urban environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(7), 1689–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(5), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1242–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cislaghi, B., & Berkowitz, A. D. (2021). The evolution of social norms interventions for health promotion: Distinguishing norms correction and norms transformation. Journal of Global Health, 11, Article 03065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constantino, S. M., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Scaling up change: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(2), 50–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, R., Andrighetto, G., & Campennì, M. (2014). Minding norms: Mechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Savoia, A. (2012). Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekmann, A., Przepiorka, W., & Rauhut, H. (2015). Lifting the veil of ignorance: An experiment on the contagiousness of norm violations. Rationality and Society, 27(3), 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimant, E. (2019). Contagion of pro- and anti-social behavior among peers and the role of social proximity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73, 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1989). Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (2015). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensminger, J., & Henrich, J. (Eds.). (2014). Experimenting with social norms: Fairness and punishment in cross-cultural perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., Gelfand, M., Wu, J., Abernathy, J., Akotia, C. S., Aldashev, A., Andersson, P. A., Andrighetto, G., Anum, A., Arikan, G., Aycan, Z., Bagherian, F., Barrera, D., Basnight-Brown, D., Batkeyev, B., Belaus, A., Berezina, E., Björnstjerna, M., … Van Lange, P. A. M. (2021). Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Etzioni, A. (2000). Toward a theory of public ritual. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faillo, M., Grieco, D., & Zarri, L. (2013). Legitimate punishment, feedback, and the enforcement of cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 77, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., & Schurtenberger, I. (2018). Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 458–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2017). Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 6068–6073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiger, N., & Swim, J. K. (2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, M. J. (2018). Rule makers, rule breakers: How culture wires our minds, shapes our nations and drive our differences. Robinson.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D’Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., … Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Getzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. The School Review, 65(4), 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H. (2010). Social norms as choreography. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 9(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2021). Understanding cultural persistence and change. Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 1541–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J., & Vostroknutov, A. (2022). Why do people follow social norms? Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2023). Rethinking norm psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(1), 12–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgs, S., Liu, J., Collins, E. I. M., & Thomas, J. M. (2019). Using social norms to encourage healthier eating. Nutrition Bulletin, 44(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, C., & Mollborn, S. (2020). Norms: An integrated framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachimowicz, J. M., Hauser, O. P., O’Brien, J. D., Sherman, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). The critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 757–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science, 328(5978), 613–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681–1685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimbrough, E. O., & Vostroknutov, A. (2018). A portable method of eliciting respect for social norms. Economics Letters, 168, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupka, E. L., & Weber, R. A. (2013). Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 495–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapinski, M. K. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legros, S., & Cislaghi, B. (2020). Mapping the social-norms literature: An overview of reviews. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 62–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2013). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S. M. (2008). Social norms: What happens when they become more abstract? In Diekmann, A., Eichner, K., Schmidt, P., & Voss, T. (Eds.), Rational choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate: Festschrift für Karl-Dieter Opp zum 70. Geburtstag [Theoretical analyses and empirical results: Festschrift for Karl-Dieter Opp for his 70th birthday] (pp. 63–81). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F. (2023). What are norms and how is norm compliance regulated? In Berg, M. & Chang, E. (Eds.), Motivation and morality: A biopsychosocial approach (pp. 46–75). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. (2019). Learning how to behave: Moral competence for social robots. In Bendel, O. (Ed.), Handbuch Maschinenethik [Handbook of machine ethics]. Springer.Google Scholar
Masclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S., & Villeval, M.-C. (2003). Monetary and nonmonetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism. American Economic Review, 93(1), 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlaney, J., Bewick, B. M., & Bauerle, J. (2010). Social norms guidebook: A guide to implementing the social norms approach in the UK. University of Bradford Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Balliet, D. (2020). Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 3432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortensen, C. R., Neel, R., Cialdini, R. B., Jaeger, C. M., Jacobson, R. P., & Ringel, M. M. (2019). Trending norms: A lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforakis, N. (2008). Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyborg, K., Anderies, J. M., Dannenberg, A., Lindahl, T., Schill, C., Schlüter, M., Adger, W. N., Arrow, K. J., Barrett, S., Carpenter, S., Chapin, F. S., Crépin, A. S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Folke, C., Jager, W., Kautsky, N., Levin, S. A., Madsen, O. J., … De Zeeuw, A. (2016). Social norms as solutions. Science, 354(6308), 42–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyborg, K., & Rege, M. (2003). On social norms: The evolution of considerate smoking behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(3), 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofosu, E. K., Chambers, M. K., Chen, J. M., & Hehman, E. (2019). Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(18), 8846–8851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2012). Putting the social into social learning: Explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children’s copying behavior. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 182–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paluck, E. L. (2009). What’s in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 594–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluck, E. L., & Shepherd, H. S. (2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 899–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H., & Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9–10), 961–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentice, D., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentice, D., & Paluck, E. L. (2020). Engineering social change using social norms: Lessons from the study of collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pristl, A.-C., Kilian, S., & Mann, A. (2021). When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 635–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procter-Scherdtel, A., & Collins, D. (2013). Smoking restrictions on campus: Changes and challenges at three Canadian universities, 1970–2010. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21(1), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Przepiorka, W., Szekely, A., Andrighetto, G., Diekmann, A., & Tummolini, L. (2022). How norms emerge from conventions (and change). Socius, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221124556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabellino, D., Morese, R., Ciaramidaro, A., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M. (2016). Third-party punishment: Altruistic and anti-social behaviours in in-group and out-group settings. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 486–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelpfennig, R., Vogt, S., Ehret, S., & Efferson, C. (2021). Promotion of behavioural change for health in a heterogeneous population. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 99(11), 819–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C. M., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(23), 2150–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverblatt, A. (2004). Media as social institution. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, S., & Agerström, J. (2021). Do social norms influence young people’s willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine? Health Communication, 38(1), 152–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparkman, G., Howe, L., & Walton, G. (2020). How social norms are often a barrier to addressing climate change but can be part of the solution. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(4), 528–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sripada, C., & Stich, S. (2006). A framework for the psychology of norms. In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., & Stich, S. P. (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 2. Culture and cognition (pp. 285–310). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strimling, P., De Barra, M., & Eriksson, K. (2018). Asymmetries in punishment propensity may drive the civilizing process. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szekely, A., Lipari, F., Antonioni, A., Paolucci, M., Sánchez, A., Tummolini, L., & Andrighetto, G. (2021). Evidence from a long-term experiment that collective risks change social norms and promote cooperation. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 5452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traxler, C. (2010). Social norms and conditional cooperative taxpayers. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummolini, L., Andrighetto, G., Castelfranchi, C., & Conte, R. (2013). A convention or (tacit) agreement betwixt us: On reliance and its normative consequences. Synthese, 190(4), 585–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tverskoi, D., Guido, A., Andrighetto, G., Sánchez, A., & Gavrilets, S. (2023). Disentangling material, social, and cognitive determinants of human behavior and beliefs. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kleef, G. A., Gelfand, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2019). The dynamic nature of social norms: New perspectives on norm development, impact, violation, and enforcement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Miltenburg, N., Buskens, V., Barrera, D., & Raub, W. (2014). Implementing punishment and reward in the public goods game: The effect of individual and collective decision rules. International Journal of the Commons, 8(1), 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villatoro, D., Andrighetto, G., Brandts, J., Nardin, L. G., Sabater-Mir, J., & Conte, R. (2014). The norm-signaling effects of group punishment: Combining agent-based simulation and laboratory experiments. Social Science Computer Review, 32(3), 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villatoro, D., Andrighetto, G., Conte, R., & Sabater-Mir, J. (2015). Self-policing through norm internalization: A cognitive solution to the tragedy of the digital commons in social networks. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Rohr, C. R., Burkart, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2011). Evolutionary precursors of social norms in chimpanzees: A new approach. Biology & Philosophy, 26(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vriens, E., Tummolini, L., & Andrighetto, G. (2023). Vaccine-hesitant people misperceive the social norm of vaccination. PNAS Nexus, 2(5), Article pgad132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinschenk, A. C., Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Democratic norms, social projection, and false consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(3–4), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, E., & Houser, D. (2011). Punish in public. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 1006–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(10), 1782–1801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barcan Marcus, R. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., & Gürcay, B. (2017). A meta-analysis of response-time tests of the sequential two-systems model of moral judgment. Memory & Cognition, 45, 566–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Cushman, F. A., Pizarro, D. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2015). Moral judgment and decision making. In Keren, G. & Wu, G. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (Vol. 1; pp. 478–515). Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, J. Z., & Kupor, D. (2020). Moral choice when harming is unavoidable. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1294–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialek, M., & De Neys, W. (2016). Conflict detection during moral decision-making: Evidence for deontic reasoners’ utilitarian sensitivity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2(5), 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, L. M., Barnes, S. M., Farnsworth, J. K., Frescher, K. D., & Walser, R. D. (2020). A contextual behavioral approach for responding to moral dilemmas in the age of COVID-19. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 17, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, H., & Roets, A. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1084–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capraro, V., Everett, J. A. C., & Earp, B. D. (2019). Priming intuition disfavors instrumental harm but not impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R. (Ed.). (1997). Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Critcher, C. R., Helzer, E. G., & Tannenbaum, D. (2020). Character evaluation: Testing another’s moral-cognitive machinery. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article 103906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, M. (2013). Models of morality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F. (2013). Action, outcome, and value: A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F. A., Gray, K., Gaffey, A., & Mendes, W. (2012). Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action. Emotion, 12, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F. A., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Social Neuroscience, 7(3), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, J. A., Pizarro, D.A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 772–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamez-Djokic, M., & Molden, D. (2016). Beyond affective influences on deontological moral judgment: The role of motivations for prevention in the moral condemnation of harm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1522–1537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein-Greenwood, J., Conway, P., Summerville, A., & Johnson, B. N. (2020). (How) do you regret killing one to save five? Affective and cognitive regret differ after utilitarian and deontological decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(9), 1303–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. & Miller, C. B. (Eds.), Moral psychology: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 35–79). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2014). Beyond point-and-shoot morality: Why cognitive (neuro)science matters for ethics. Ethics, 124(4), 695–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, B. J., Purcell, N., Burkman, K., Litz, B. T., Bryan, C. J., Schmitz, M., Villierme, C., Walsh, J., & Maguen, S. (2019). Moral injury: An integrative review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32, 350–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gürcay, B., & Baron, J. (2017). Challenges for the sequential two-system model of moral judgement. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(1), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanselmann, M., & Tanner, C. (2008). Taboos and conflicts in decision making: Sacred values, decision difficulty, and emotions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., & Powell, D. (2016). Deontological coherence: A framework for commonsense moral reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1179–1203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, Z., & Powell, D. (2016). How large is the role of emotion in judgments of moral dilemmas? PLOS ONE, 11(7), Article e0154780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, A. I., Robbins, P., Friedman, J., & Meyers, C. (2014). More than a feeling: Counterintuitive effects of compassion on moral judgment. In Sytsma, J. (Ed.), Advances in experimental philosophy of mind (pp. 125–179). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kahane, G. (2012). On the wrong track: Process and content in moral psychology. Mind & Language, 27(5), 519–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahane, G. (2014). Intuitive and counterintuitive morality. In D’Arms, J. and Jacobson, D. (Eds.), Moral psychology and human agency: Philosophical essays on the science of ethics (pp. 9–39). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, G. (2015). Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 551–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N., Farias, M., Savulescu, J., & Tracey, I. (2012). The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314(5800), 829–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Körner, A., & Volk, S. (2014). Concrete and abstract ways to deontology: Cognitive capacity moderates construal level effects on moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosch, A., Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2012). Choice processes and their post-decisional consequences in morally conflicting decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(3), 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & Fein, D. (2012). Hamilton vs. Kant: Pitting adaptations for altruism against adaptations for moral judgment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, J. F., & Royzman, E. B. (2018). The moral myopia model: Why and how reasoning matters in moral judgment. In Pennycook, G. (Ed.), The new reflectionism in cognitive psychology (pp. 70–92). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Holyoak, K. J. (2020). “But he’s my brother”: The impact of family obligation on moral judgments and decisions. Memory & Cognition, 48, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, M., Sul, S., & Kim, H. (2018). Social observation increases deontological judgments in moral dilemmas. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, D. R., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Taboo or tragic: Effect of tradeoff type on moral choice, conflict, and confidence. Mind & Society, 7, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mata, A. (2019). Social metacognition in moral judgment: Decisional conflict promotes perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 117(6), 1061–1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPhetres, J., Conway, P., Hughes, J. S., & Zuckerman, M. (2018). Reflecting on God’s will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples’ deontological dilemma responses, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R., & Cushman, F. (2013). Aversive for me, wrong for you: First-person behavioral aversions underlie the moral condemnation of harm. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(10), 707–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molendijk, T. (2018). Toward an interdisciplinary conceptualization of moral injury: From unequivocal guilt and anger to moral conflict and disorientation. New Ideas in Psychology, 51, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. B., Clark, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19(6), 549–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. (2021). Rational rules: Towards a theory of moral learning. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S., & Mallon, R. (2006). Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition, 100(3), 530–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). The costs of tragedy: Some moral limits of cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 1005–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S., & Finkbeiner, M. (2020). Examining the unfolding of moral decisions across time using the reach-to-touch paradigm. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(2), 218–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, I., Zucchelli, M. M., Kool, W., Campbell, S., Fornasier, F., Calò, M., Silani, G., Cikara, M., & Cushman, F. (2021). Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 443–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, J. M., Bruni, T., & Greene, J. D. (2014). Are “counter-intuitive” deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to Kahane et al. (2012). Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1368–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, J. M., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 511–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, J., & Landy, J. (2013). “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(6), 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C. J., & Conway, P. (2018). Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas. Emotion, 18(7), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C. J., Knighten, K. R., & Conway, P. (2019). Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who is deontological? Completing moral dilemmas in front of mirrors increases deontological but not utilitarian response tendencies. Cognition, 192, Article 103993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rom, S. C., & Conway, P. (2018). The strategic moral self: Self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royzman, E. B., Goodwin, G. P., & Leeman, R. F. (2011). When sentimental rules collide: “Norms with feelings” in the dilemmatic context. Cognition, 121, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Leeman, R. F. (2015). Are thoughtful people more utilitarian? CRT as a unique predictor of moral minimalism in the dilemmatic context. Cognitive Science, 39(2), 325–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, H. (2012). Morally irrelevant factors: What’s left of the dual process-model of moral cognition? Philosophical Psychology, 25(6), 783–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shortland, N., & Alison, L. (2020). Colliding sacred values: A psychological theory of least-worst option selection. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 118–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trémolière, B., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2014). Efficient kill–save ratios ease up the cognitive demands on counterintuitive moral utilitarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 923–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlmann, E. L., Zhu, L., & Tannenbaum, D. (2013). When it takes a bad person to do the right thing. Cognition, 126(2), 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (1965). Ethical consistency. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplement), 39, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Ahmed, M. M., Chung, K. Y., & Eichenseher, J. W. (2003). Business students’ perception of ethics and moral judgment: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues. In Wyer, R. & Srull, T. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1–40). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, D. M., & Medin, D. L. (2007). Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychological Science, 18(1), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, E., & Kteily, N. (2017). The enemy as animal: Symmetric dehumanization during asymmetric warfare. PLoS ONE, 12(7), Article e0181422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchtel, E. E., Guan, Y., Peng, Q., Su, Y., Sang, B., Chen, S. X., & Bond, M. H. (2015). Immorality East and West: Are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1382–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. D., Lindquist, K. A., & Gray, K. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciuk, D. J. (2018). Assessing the contextual stability of moral foundations: Evidence from a survey experiment. Research & Politics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/205316801878174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, F. (2015). Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, F., Gray, K., Gaffey, A., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action. Emotion, 12(1), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P., Turiel, E., & Black, A. (1983). The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children’s social reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). The speed of morality: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(11), 3068–3072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2018). Interpersonal harm aversion as a necessary foundation for morality: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 30(1), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, J. A. C., Clark, C. J., Meindl, P., Luguri, J. B., Earp, B. D., Graham, J., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. F. (2020). Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 461–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Antonenko, O., & John, O. P. (2012). Liberating reason from the passions: Overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotion reappraisal. Psychological Science, 23(7), 788–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgas, J. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R., & Jackson, J. C. (2017). The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 800–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewirth, A. (1978). The basis and content of human rights. Georgia Law Review, 13, 1143–1170.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34(3), 223–237.Google Scholar
Goodwin, G. P., & Darley, J. M. (2012). Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. (2015). Explaining away differences in moral judgment: Comment on Gray and Keeney (2015). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 869–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Motyl, M., Meindl, P., Iskiwitch, C., & Mooijman, M. (2019). Moral foundations theory: On the advantages of moral pluralism over moral monism. In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 211–222). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, K., & Keeney, J. E. (2015). Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 859–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., MacCormack, J. K., Henry, T., Banks, E., Schein, C., Armstrong-Carter, E., Abrams, S., & Muscatell, K. A. (2022). The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(6), 1199–1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, K., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1600–1615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerra, V. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). The Community, Autonomy, and Divinity Scale (CADS): A new tool for the cross-cultural study of morality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., Bjorklund, D. F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason [Unpublished].Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of Conservatives and Liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., & Stich, S. (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2011). How moral foundations theory succeeded in building on sand: A response to Suhler and Churchland. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2117–2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Attitudes and Social Cognition, 65(4), 613–628.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, X., Zhou, S., Fahoum, N., Wu, T., Gao, T., Shamay-Tsoory, S., Gelfand, M. J., Wu, X., & Han, S. (2021). Cognitive and neural bases of collateral damage during intergroup conflict. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(9), 1214–1225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannikainen, I. R., Miller, R. M., & Cushman, F. A. (2017). Act versus impact: Conservatives and liberals exhibit different structural emphases in moral judgment. Ratio, 30(4), 462–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, E., Mikulan, E., Decety, J., Sigman, M., Garcia, M. del C., Silva, W., Ciraolo, C., Vaucheret, E., Baglivo, F., Huepe, D., Lopez, V., Manes, F., Bekinschtein, T. A., & Ibanez, A. (2016). Early detection of intentional harm in the human amygdala. Brain, 139(1), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, N., & Gray, K. (2020). The moral psychology of raceless, genderless strangers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 216–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345(6202), 1340–1343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: An Appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3(3), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2012). Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men. Emotion, 12(1), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglehart, R. F., Basanez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izard, C. E. (1992). Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations. Psychological Review, 99(3), 561–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jambon, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2018). Individual differences in prototypical moral and conventional judgments and children’s proactive and reactive aggression. Child Development, 89(4), 1343–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, K. (2010). Is the “Harry Potter…” series truly harmless? ChristianAnswers.Net. https://christiananswers.net/q-eden/harrypotter.htmlGoogle Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2016). Social justice and social order: Binding moralities across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 11(3), Article e0152479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, L. A. (2015). Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. (M. Gregor, Ed. and Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivikangas, J. M., Fernández-Castilla, B., Järvelä, S., Ravaja, N., & Lönnqvist, J.-E. (2021). Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(1), 55–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16(2), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Contributions to Human Development, 10, 174.Google Scholar
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, F., & Hoffman, M. (2016). The emerging neuroscience of third-party punishment. Trends in Neurosciences, 39(8), 499–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 518–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Guen, O., Samland, J., Friedrich, T., Hanus, D., & Brown, P. (2015). Making sense of (exceptional) causal relations. A cross-cultural and cross-linguistic study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2015, August 11). How trigger warnings are hurting mental health on campus. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F. (2004). The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. (2009). Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: A formal model of unconscious moral and legal knowledge. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 50, pp. 27–100). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1988). When do American children and adults reason in social conventional terms? Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, S. (2012). The panic virus: The true story behind the vaccine-autism controversy. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Moore, J. W., Teufel, C., Subramaniam, N., Davis, G., & Fletcher, P. C. (2013). Attribution of intentional causation influences the perception of observed movements: Behavioral evidence and neural correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulvey, K. L. (2016). Evaluations of moral and conventional intergroup transgressions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 489–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, S. (2021). Rational rules: Towards a theory of moral learning. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, L., & Young, L. (2014). Blaming the victim in the case of rape. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Westview.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. (1994). Emergent properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(2), 91–104.Google Scholar
Oldridge, D. (2017). Strange histories: The trial of the pig, the walking dead, and other matters of fact from the Medieval and Renaissance worlds (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, J. M., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 511–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1–24). Springer.Google Scholar
Rai, T., & Fiske, A. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royzman, E. B., & Borislow, S. H. (2022). The puzzle of wrongless harms: Some potential concerns for dyadic morality and related accounts. Cognition, 220, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royzman, E. B., Kim, K., & Leeman, R. F. (2015). The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1147–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, C., Ritter, R. S., & Gray, K. (2016). Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link. Emotion, 16(6), 862–876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27(2), 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (2012). Relativism and universalism. In Fassin, D. (Ed.), A companion to moral anthropology (pp. 85–102). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). The emergence of morality in young children. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In Brandt, A. M. & Rozin, P. (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2018). Asking the right questions in moral psychology. In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 565–571). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J., Washburn, A. N., & Carsel, T. S. (2015). The psychological foundations and consequences of moral conviction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (1981). Reasoning in the personal and moral domains: Adolescent and young adult women’s decision-making regarding abortion. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 424–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. (2018). The moral domain. In Gray, K. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 547–555). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E., Edwards, C. P., & Kohlberg, L. (1978). Moral development in Turkish children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E., Hildebrandt, C., Wainryb, C., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1991). Judging social issues: Difficulties, inconsistencies, and consistencies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(2), i–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions, and vagaries. In Kagan, J. & Lamb, S. (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 155–243). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). The importance of moral construal: Moral versus non-moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions. PLoS ONE, 7(11), Article e48693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Hamlin, J. K. (2018). The early emergence of sociomoral evaluation: Infants prefer prosocial others. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitell, S. J., & Patwardhan, A. (2008). The role of moral intensity and moral philosophy in ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the European Union. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2018). Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 825–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, D. R., & Turiel, E. (1980). Act-rule relations: Children’s concepts of social rules. Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, S. F., Zhao, H., Leong, K. K., Smetana, J. G., Nucci, L. P., & Blair, R. J. R. (2017). Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(6), 1114–1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoder, K. J., & Decety, J. (2018). The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(3), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L., Scholz, J., & Saxe, R. (2011). Neural evidence for “intuitive prosecution”: The use of mental state information for negative moral verdicts. Social Neuroscience, 6(3), 302–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yucel, M., Hepach, R., & Vaish, A. (2020). Young children and adults show differential arousal to moral and conventional transgressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed