Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T05:51:58.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Identity

from Part IV - Individual Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
Ron Darvin  and
Bonny Norton
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

In language learning research, different terms have been used to refer to identity: “self”; “position”; “role”; “subjectivity”; “subject”; and “agent”. Scholars in the 1970s and 1980s interested in this research area tended to draw distinctions between social identity and cultural identity. Social identity referred to the relationship between the learner and the larger social world, mediated through institutions like families, schools, workplaces, social services, and law courts (e.g., Gumperz, 1982). On the other hand, cultural identity referred to the relationship between an individual and members of a particular ethnic group who share a common history and language, and similar ways of understanding the world. Past theories of cultural identity, however, tended to essentialize and reify identities in problematic ways (Atkinson, 1999). In more recent years, the difference between social and cultural identity is seen to be theoretically more fluid, and the intersections between social and cultural identities are considered more significant than their differences. Contemporary identity research has been consistently marked by a social constructionist paradigm that pays attention to the micro-level of interaction and meaning making. Recognizing that identity is socioculturally constructed, educators draw on both institutional and community practices to understand the conditions under which language learners speak, read, and write the target language.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 451 - 474
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andema, S. (2014). Promoting digital literacy in African education: ICT innovations in a Ugandan primary teachers’ college. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0167565.Google Scholar
Arkoudis, S., & Davison, C. (guest eds.) (2008). Chinese students: Perspectives on their social, cognitive, and linguistic investment in English medium interaction [Special issue]. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 18(1).Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (1999). TESOL and culture. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 625–654.Google Scholar
Baker, S. (2013). Conceptualising the use of Facebook in ethnographic research: As tool, as data and as context. Ethnography & Education, 8(2), 131–145.Google Scholar
Ballinger, S. (2017). Examining peer language use and investment in a distinct North American immersion context. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 184–198.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. (2016). A short story approach to analyzing teacher (imagined) identities over time. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 655–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearse, C., & de Jong, E. J. (2008). Cultural and linguistic investment: Adolescents in a secondary two-way immersion program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(3), 325–340.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2007). The rise of identity in SLA research, post Firth and Wagner (1997). The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 863–876.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2010). Researching language and identity. In Paltridge, B. & Phakti, A. (eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 337–349). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2014). Social class and applied linguistics. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Information, 16(6), 645–668.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. F. (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Büscher, M., & Urry, J. (2009). Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 99–116.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Negotiating translingual literacy: An enactment. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 40–67.Google Scholar
Clark, J. B. (2009). Multilingualism, citizenship, and identity: Voices of youth and symbolic investments in an urban, globalized world. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). New media, new learning. In Cole, D. and Pullen, D. (eds.), Multiliteracies in motion: Current theory and practice (pp. 87–104). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2006). Identity texts: The imaginative construction of self through multiliteracies pedagogy. In García, O., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Torres-Guman, M. (eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and glocalization (pp. 51–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R. (2015). Representing the margins: Multimodal performance as a tool for critical reflection and pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 590–600.Google Scholar
Darvin, R. (2016). Language and identity in the digital age. In Preece, S. (ed.), Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 523–540). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darvin, R. (2017). Language, power and critical digital literacy. In Thorne, S. & May, S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Language and Education (Vol. 9, pp. 1–14) New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2014). Social class, identity, and migrant students. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 13(2), 111–117.Google Scholar
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56.Google Scholar
Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools: Learning and social participation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2010). Reconceptualizing language, language learning, and the adolescent immigrant language learner in the age of postmodern globalization. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(9), 769–781.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (2017), Introduction: Identity, transdisciplinarity, and the good language teacher. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 3–14.Google Scholar
Deters, P., Gao, X., Miller, E., & Vitanova, G. (2015). Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (eds.) (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19–47.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (eds.) (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (Vol. 1). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A., Moyer, M., & Roberts, C. (eds.) (2013). Language, migration and social inequalities: A critical sociolinguistic perspective on institutions and work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Early, M., & Norton, B. (2014). Revisiting English as medium of instruction in rural African classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(7), 1–18.Google Scholar
Eynon, R., Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2008). The ethics of internet research. In Fielding, N., Lee, R., & Blank, G. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 23–41). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics (trans. G. Burchell). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gao, X., Cheng, H., & Kelly, P. (2008). Supplementing an uncertain investment? Mainland Chinese students practising English together in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 18(1), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearing, N., & Roger, P. (2017). “I’m never going to be part of it”: Identity, investment and learning Korean. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(2), 155–168.Google Scholar
Gu, M. (2008). Identity construction and investment transformation: College students from non-urban areas in China. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 18(1), 49–70.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982). Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685.Google Scholar
Haneda, M. (2005). Investing in foreign-language writing: A study of two multicultural learners. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(4), 269–290.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. (ed.) (2011). Identity formation in globalizing contexts: Language learning in the new millennium (Vol. 1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., …, Tripp, L. (2010) Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kamada, L. (2010). Hybrid identities and adolescent girls. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (eds.) (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities [Special edition]. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4).Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2013). Afterword. In Norton, B., Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd edn.) (pp. 192–201). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44–65.Google Scholar
Lam, W. S. E. (2013). Multilingual practices in transnational digital contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 820–825.Google Scholar
Leander, K. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., and Leu, D. (eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33–65). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lewis, C., & Tierney, J. D. (2011). Mobilizing emotion in an urban English classroom. Changing English, 18(3), 319–329.Google Scholar
Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397–403.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L., & Wong, S. L. C. (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 577–609.Google Scholar
Menard-Warwick, J. (2009). Gendered identities and immigrant language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, S., & Williams, M. (eds.) (2014). Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Miller, E., & Kubota, R. (2013). Second language identity construction. In Herschensohn, J. & Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 230–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moje, E., & Luke, A. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 415–437.Google Scholar
Motha, S., & Lin, A. (2014). “Non-coercive rearrangements”: Theorizing desire in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 331–359.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. E., Hull, G. A., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self-presentation taking, and mistaking the show on the road. Written Communication, 25(4), 415–440.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd edn.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (guest ed.) (2014). Multilingual literacy and social change in African communities [Special issue]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. (2015). Identity, investment, and faces of English internationally. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 375–391.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2018). Identity and the ownership of English. In Fuad, A. (ed). The nonnative English teacher. TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Norton, B., & Gao, Y. (2008). Identity, investment, and Chinese learners of English. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 18(1), 109–120.Google Scholar
Norton, B., Jones, S., & Ahimbisibwe, D. (2011). Learning about HIV/AIDS in Uganda: Digital resources and language learner identities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(4), 568–589.Google Scholar
Norton, B., & Williams, C. J. (2012). Digital identities, student investments and eGranary as a placed resource. Language and Education, 26(4), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (eds.) (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pittaway, D. S. (2004). Investment and second language acquisition. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 1(4), 203–218.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. (2004). Student Spanish use and investment in a dual immersion classroom: Implications for second language acquisition and heritage language maintenance. The Modern Language Journal, 88(1), 75–101.Google Scholar
Preece, S. (ed.) (2016). Routledge handbook of language and identity. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rojo, L. M. (2013). Capitalising students through linguistic practices: A comparative analysis of new educational programmes in a global era. In Duchêne, A., Moyer, M., & Roberts, C. (eds.), Language, migration and social inequalities: A critical sociolinguistic perspective on institutions and work (pp. 118–146). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2002). Should I stay or should I go? Investigating Cambodian women’s participation and investment in adult ESL programs. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 9–26.Google Scholar
Stornaiuolo, A., & Hall, M. (2014). Tracing resonance: Qualitative research in a networked world. In Gudmundsdottir, G. & Vasbø, K. (eds.), Methodological challenges when exploring digital learning spaces in education (pp. 29–43). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Stornaiuolo, A., Higgs, J., & Hull, G. (2013). Social media as authorship: Methods for studying literacies and communities online. In Albers, P., Holbrook, T., & Flint, A. (eds.), New literacy research methods (pp. 224–237). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stranger-Johannessen, E. (2017). The African Storybook, teachers’ resources and pedagogical practices. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 26–36.Google Scholar
Stranger-Johannessen, E., & Norton, B. (2017). The African Storybook and language teacher identity in digital times. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 45–60.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). “New” mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. The Modern Language Journal, 91(S1), 820–836.Google Scholar
Temples, A., & Nelson, G. (2013). Intercultural computer-mediated communication: insights from corpus-based analysis. In Belcher, D. and Nelson, G. (eds.), Critical and corpus-based approaches to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 154–179). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L., & Black, R. W. (2011). Identity and interaction in internet-mediated contexts. In Higgins, C. (ed.), Identity formation in globalizing contexts: Language learning in the new millennium (Vol. 1, pp. 257–278). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Trent, J. (2008). Promoting investment by Chinese learners in classroom discourse: Integrating content and language in the undergraduate classroom. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 18(1), 30–48.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2009). Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects, in Baynham, M. and Prinsloo, M. (eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 123–140). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.Google Scholar
Weber, S., and Mitchell, C. (2008). Imaging, keyboarding, and posting identities: Young people and new media technologies. In Buckingham, D. (ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 25–47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wohlwend, K. E., & Lewis, C. (2011). Critical literacy, critical engagement, and digital technology: Convergence and embodiment in glocal spheres. In Lapp, D. & Fisher, D. (eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd edn.) (pp. 188–194). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×