Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Maps Volume I
- Figures Volume I
- Tables Volume I
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part One Language Contact and Genetic Linguistics
- Part Two Linguistic Areas
- Part Three Language Spread
- Part Four Emergence and Spread of Some European Languages
- Part Five Language Diasporas
- Author Index
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
Part Two - Linguistic Areas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 June 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Maps Volume I
- Figures Volume I
- Tables Volume I
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part One Language Contact and Genetic Linguistics
- Part Two Linguistic Areas
- Part Three Language Spread
- Part Four Emergence and Spread of Some European Languages
- Part Five Language Diasporas
- Author Index
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language ContactVolume 1: Population Movement and Language Change, pp. 187 - 324Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Adamou, Evangelia. 2008. Armenian. In Le patrimonie plurilingue de la Grèce (Le nom des langues II), ed. by Adamou, Evangelia, 71–6. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Ronelle. 2000. In honor of diversity: The linguistic resources of the Balkans (Kenneth E. Naylor Memorial Lecture Series in South Slavic Linguistics, No. 2). Columbus, OH: Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Literatures, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S.P. 2014. Pre-Greek: Phonology, morphology, lexicon. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyavski-Frank, Masha. 2003. The Balkan conditional in South Slavic. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1952. La construction passive du parfait transitif. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 48.52–62.Google Scholar
Bersirov, B.M. & Tlebzu, D.A.. 1981. Osobennosti sklonenija imen v reči jugoslavskix i iordanskix adygov. In Padezhnyj sostav i sistema sklonenija v iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykax. (IX regional’naja nauchnaja sessija.) Tezisy dokladov, ed. by Abdullaev, A.G., Abdullaev, I.X., Ibragimov, G.X., Magomedov, A.G., & Mikailov, K.Sh., 39–40. Maxachkala: Dag. Fil. AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert & Igla, Birgit. 2004a. Komentierter Dialektatlas des Romani. Teil 1: Vergleich der Dialekte. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert, & Igla, Birgit. 2004b. Komentierter Dialektatlas des Romani. Teil 2: Dialektkarten mit einer CD Rom. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Boykov, Grigor. 2016. The human cost of warfare: Population loss during the Ottoman conquest and the demographic history of Bulgaria in the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Era. In The Ottoman conquest of the Balkans: Interpretations and research debates, ed. by Schmitt, Oliver Jens, 103–66. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence, & Smith-Stark, Thomas C.. 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62.530–70.Google Scholar
Charanis, Peter. 1961. The Transfer of Population as a Policy in the Byzantine Empire. Comparative Studies in Society and History 3.2.140–54.Google Scholar
Danforth, Loring & van Boeschoeten, Riki. 2012. Children of the Greek Civil War: Refugees and the politics of memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Domoselickaja, M.V. 2002. Albansko-vostočnoromanskij sopostavitel’nyj ponjatnjy slovar’: Skotovodčeskaja leksika. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
DuNay, André. 1996. The origins of the Rumanians: The early history of the Rumanian language. Buffalo, NY: Matthias Corvinus.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2003. Linguistic epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fielder, Grace E. 2008. The status of discourse markers as Balkanisms in South Slavic. In American contributions to the 14th International Congress of Slavists, Ohrid, September 2008, vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. by Bethin, Christina Y., 111–29. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Fielder, Grace E. 2018. The semiotics of ideology: The Bulgarian definite article. In Чекај: Papers for Christina E. Kramer on the occasion of her retirement, ed. by Donald L. Dyer & Jane Hacking, special edition of Balkanistica 32.2.45–70.Google Scholar
Fine, John V.A. 1983. The Early Medieval Balkans. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Fine, John V.A. 1987. The Late Medieval Balkans: A critical survey from the late twelfth century to the Ottoman Conquest. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1996. The Turkish lexical element in the languages of the Republic of Macedonia from the Ottoman period to independence. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 32.2.133–50.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1998. The Albanian language in its eastern diaspora. In Arvanitika kai Ellēnika: Zētēmata polyglōssikōn kai polypolitismikōn koinotētōn, vol. 2, ed. by Tsitsipis, Loukas, 215–31. Livadeia: European Union & The Prefecture of Levadeia.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1999. Macedonian language and identity: Recent history and recent historiography. In Guard the word well bound: Proceedings of the Third North American-Macedonian Conference on Macedonian Studies (Indiana Slavic Studies 10), ed. by Kramer, Christina & Cook, Brian, 71–86. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2000. Romani in the Balkan Linguistic League. In Valkanikē Glōssologia: Sygkhronia kai Diakhronia/Balkanlinguistik: Synchronie und Diachronie, ed. by Tzitzilis, Chr. & Symeonidēs, Kh., 95–105. Thessaloniki: University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2002/3. Boundaries and borders in Balkan Slavic. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 44–5.161–73. (Actually published 2006.)Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2003. Language in Macedonia as an identity construction site. In When languages collide: Perspectives on language conflict, language competition, and language coexistence, ed. by Joseph, Brian D., DeStafano, Johanna, Jacobs, Neil, & Lehiste, Ilse, 257–95. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2006. Dialectological perspectives on Romani in the Balkan Linguistic League. Balkansko ezikoznanie – Linguistique balkanique 45.1.45–54.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2007. Balkanizing the Balkan sprachbund: A closer look at grammatical permeability and feature distribution. In Grammars in contact: A cross linguistic typology, ed. by Aikhenvald, A. and Dixon, R.F.W., 201–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2008a. Macedonian dialectology and eurology: Areal and typological perspectives. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61.2.139–46.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2008b. Balkan object reduplication in areal and dialectological perspective. In Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, ed. by Kallulli, Dalina & Tasmowski, Liliane, 25–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2011a. The Balkan languages and Balkan linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 40.275–91.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2011b. Families, leagues, and hybridity: The past and future of Slavic and East European languages. Distinguished Professor Lecture, AATSEEL Keynote Address. Slavic and East European Journal 55.1–13.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2012a. A tantrum from the cradle of democracy: On the dangers of studying Macedonian. In Macedonia: The political, social, economic and cultural foundations of a Balkan state, ed. by de Munck, Victor C. & Risteski, Ljupcho, 22–43. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2012b. Conjunction calquing – a heartland Balkanism. In Balkanismen heute – Balkanisms today –Balkanizmy segodnja, ed. by Kahl, Thede, Metzelin, Michael, & Schaller, Helmut, 31–7. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2014. Languages are wealth: The sprachbund as linguistic capital. In Proceedings: 38th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Lionnet, Florian, Carpenter, Kayla, David, Oana, Stark, Tammy, Wauters, Vivian, & Sheil, Christine, 163–77. Berkeley, CA: LSA eLanguage.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2015. The effects of the 1913 Treaty of Bucharest on the languages spoken in Macedonia. In On Macedonian matters: From the partition and annexation of Macedonia to the present, ed. by Friedman, Victor A. & Hlavač, Jim, 133–60. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2018a. Reflexes of common Slavic nasal vowels in Southwest Macedonian dialects revisited: An areal and Balkanological account. In American contributions to the XVI International Congress of Slavists: Linguistics, ed. by Bethin, Christina, 85–98. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2018b. Where do evidentials come from? In The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 124–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2019a. Turkisms in the Macedonian “bombs” of 2015: On language as flag in the Balkans in the 21st century. Balkanistika 32.1.1–17.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2019b. Parallel universes and universal parallels: Balkan Romani evidential strategies. In Balkan syntax and (universal) principles of grammar, ed. by Joseph, Brian D. & Krapova, Iliana, 37–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. & Dankoff, Robert. 1991. The earliest text in Balkan (Rumelian) Romani: A passage from Evliya Çelebi’s Seyāhat‑nāme. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society (Fifth Series) 1.1.1–20.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. & Joseph, Brian D.. 2014. Lessons from Judezmo about the Balkan sprachbund and contact linguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 226.3–23.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. & Joseph, Brian D.. 2017. Reassessing sprachbunds: A view from the Balkans. In The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, ed. by Hickey, Raymond, 55–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. & Joseph, Brian D.. 2018. Non-nominative and depersonalized subjects in the Balkans: Areality vs. genealogy. In Non-canonically case-marked subjects. The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers, ed. by Barðdal, Johanna, Pat-El, Na’ama, & Carey, Stephen Mark, 22–53. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. & Joseph, Brian D.. forthcoming. The Balkan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan & Irvine, Judith T.. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 64.967–1001.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zbigniew. 1964. Conditionalis typu bałkańskiego w językach południowosłowiańskich. Krakow: Polska Akademia Nauk.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zbigniew. 1976. On the mechanism of Slavic–Rumanian linguistic interference in the Balkans. In Bulgaria, past and present: Studies in history, literature, economics, music, sociology, folklore & linguistics, ed. by Butler, Thomas, 296–309. Columbus, OH: AAASS.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zigniew. 1984. The Arumanian dialect of Kruševo SR Macedonia. Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zbigniew. 1997. The ethnic background and internal linguistic mechanism of the so-called Balkanization of Macedonian. Balkanistica 10.13–19.Google Scholar
Gradeva, Rossitza. 2011. Conversion to Islam in Bulgarian historiography: An overview. In Religion, ethnicity and contested nationhood in the former Ottoman space, ed. by Nielsen, J., 187–222. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Robert. 1996. Politics of dialects among Serbs, Croats, and Muslims in the Former Yugoslavia. East European Politics and Societies 10.3.393–415.Google Scholar
Grigoriadis, Ioannis N. 2013. Instilling religion in Greek and Turkish nationalism: A “sacred synthesis.” New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1989. Yugoslavia – A crossroads of Sprachbünde. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 25.1.44–7.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric. P. 1992. Albanian. In Indo-European numerals, ed. by Gvozdanović, Jadranka, 835–921. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1994. Albanian. In The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, ed. by Asher, R.E., 65–7. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 2008. Studime për gjuhën shqipe. Paper presented at the International Symposium Vepra Themelore në Albanologji – Çmimi i Albanologjisë 2008, Center for Albanology, Tirana, December 18, 2008. Reported in Shekulli (December 19, 2009), 12–13.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 2010. On the etymology of Crimean Gothic apel. North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 58–9.453–80.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20.271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Uwe. 2004. Südosteuropa-Linguistik und Kreolisierung. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 40.1.1–16.Google Scholar
Höeg, C. 1925. Les Saracatsans: une tribu nomade grecque I. Étude linguistique. Paris: Édouard Champion.Google Scholar
Holzer, Georg. 1995. Die Einheitlichkeit des Slavischen um 600 n. Chr. und ihr Zerfall. Wiener Slavistisches Jahbuch 41.55–89.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1997. Greek: A history of a language and its speakers. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ilievski, Petar. 1973. Kon interpretacijata na modelot na udvoeniot objekt vo makedonskiot jazik. Godišen zbornik, Filozofski fakultet na Univerzitetot Skopje 205–20.Google Scholar
Illič-Svityč, Vladislav M. 1962. O studiiakh utraty rinezma v iugozapadnykh makedonskikh govorakh. Voprosy slavianskogo iazykoznaniia 6.77–88.Google Scholar
Isaac, Benjamin. 2004. The invention of racism in classical antiquity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ismajli, Rexhap. 2015. Studime për historinë e shqipes në kontekst ballkanik. Prishtina: Akademia e Shkencave dhe e Arteve e Kosovës.Google Scholar
Jaranov, D. 1932. Preselničkoto dviženie na bălgari ot Makedonija i albanija kăm istočnite bălgarski zemi prez XV do XIX vek. Makedonski pregled 7.2/3.63–118.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1931/1962/1971. Kharakteristike evrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza. Reprinted in Selected Writings, vol. 1 (The Hague: Mouton). Reprinted again in 2nd ed. of Selected Writings, vol. 1.143–201, which is the version cited here.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahl, Thede. 2006. The Islamisation of the Meglen Vlachs (Megleno-Romanians): The village of Nânti (Nótia) and the “Nântinets” in present-day Turkey. Nationalities Papers 34.71–90.Google Scholar
Kahl, Thede. 2008. Does Aromanian have a chance of survival? In The Romance Balkans, ed. by Sikimić, Biljana & Ašić, Tijana, 123–40. Belgrade: Institute for Balkans Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Kaimio, Jorma. 1979. The Romans and the Greek language (Comentationes Humanarum Litterarum 64). Helsiniki: Societa Scientarium Fennica.Google Scholar
Kănčov, Vasil. 1900. Makedonija: Etnografija i statistika. Sofia: Bălgarsko knižovno družestvo.Google Scholar
Kazazis, Kostas. 1972. The status of Turkisms in the present-day Balkan languages. In Aspects of the Balkans: Continuity and change. Contributions to the International Balkan Conference held at UCLA, October 23–28, 1969, ed. by Birnbaum, Henrik & Vryonis, Speros Jr., 87–116. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kočev, Ivan (ed.). 2001. Bălgarski dialekten Atlas. Obobštavašt tom: I–III Fonetika, Akcentologija, Leksika. Sofia: Trud.Google Scholar
Koneski, Blaže. 1983. A historical phonology of the Macedonian language. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Koneski, Blaže, Vidoeski, Božo, & Jašar-Nasteva, Olivera. 1968. Distribution des balkanismes en macédonien. In Actes du premier congrès international des études balkaniques et sud-est européens, vol. 6, ed. by Gălăbov, Ivan, Georgiev, Vladimir, & Zaimov, Jordan, 517–46. Sofia: Bălgarska Akademija na Naukite.Google Scholar
Kopitar, Jernej. 1829. Albanische, walachische und bulgarische Sprache. Jahrbücher der Literatur 46.59–106.Google Scholar
Kostopoulos, Tasos. 2000. Hē apagoreumenē glōssa: kratikē katastolē tōn Slavikōn dialektōn stēn Hellēnikē Makedonia. Athens: Maure Lista.Google Scholar
Kramer, Christina E. 2019. Anglicisms in colloquial Macedonian: What the Bombi tell us. In And thus you are everywhere honored: Papers in honor of Brian D. Joseph, ed. by Penninton, James J., Friedman, Victor A., Grenble, Lenore A., & Collins, Daniel, 163–74. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1941. Some relations of linguistics and ethnology. Language 17.4.287–91.Google Scholar
Krstić, Tijana. 2016. New directions in the study of conversion to Islam in Ottoman Rumeli between the fourteenth and the seventeenth centuries: Reconsidering methods, theories and terminology. In The Ottoman conquest of the Balkans: Interpretations and research debates, ed. by Schmitt, Oliver Jens, 167–87. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Ladas, S.P. 1932. The exchange of minorities: Bulgaria, Greece and Turkey. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2016. South Macedonian decomposed nasal vowels are not an archaism but an early Balkanism, Paper presented at the Eleventh Meeting of the Slavic Linguistic Society, September 24–26, 2016, Toronto.Google Scholar
Lithoksoou, Dimitris. 2013. The Greek anti-Macedonian struggle, from St. Elias’ day to Zagorichani (1903–1905). Melbourne: Salient Publishing.Google Scholar
Lunt, Horace G. 1985. Slavic, Common Slavic, and Old Church Slavonic. In Litterae slavicae medii aevi Francisco Venceslao Mareš sexagenario oblatae, ed. by Reinhart, Johannes, 185–204. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2016. Romanian. In The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, ed. by Ledgeway, Adam & Maiden, Martin, 91–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markovikj, Marjan. 2007. Aromanskiot i makedonskiot govor od ohridsko-struškiot region (vo balkanski kontekst). Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 1994. Structural Balkanisms in Romani. In Sprachlicher Standard und Substandard in Südosteuropa und Osteuropa, ed. by Reiter, Norbert, Hinrichs, Uwe, & van Leeuwen-Turnovcová, Jiřina, 195–210. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2002. Romani: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2005. The classification of Romani dialects: A historical-geographic perspective. In General and applied Romani linguistics: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Romani Linguistics, ed. by Schrammel, Barbara, Halwachs, Dieter, & Ambrosch, Gerd, 7–26. Munich: LinCom Europa.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2010. Romani in Britain: The afterlife of a language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Miklosich, Franz. 1862. Die slavischen Elemente im Rumunischen. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 12.1–70.Google Scholar
Mladenova, Olga. 2007. Definiteness in Bulgarian: Modelling the process of language change. Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Mošin, Vladimir 1963. O periodizacii russko-južnoslavjanskih literaturnyh svjazej X–XV vv. Trudy otdela drevnerusskoj literatury 19.28–106.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2004. Language birth and death. Annual Review of Anthropology 33.201–22.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Obolensky, Dimitri. 1971. The Byzantine commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Pippidi, Andrei. 2016. Taking possession of Wallachia: Facts and interpretations. In The Ottoman conquest of the Balkans: Interpretations and research debates, ed. by Schmitt, Oliver Jens, 189–208. Vienna: ÖsterreichischeAkademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine. 2019. Language contact continues: Bulgarian–Turkish code switching in the 21st century. Balkanistika 32.1.233–55.Google Scholar
Sampson, John. 1926. The dialect of the Gypsies of Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandfeld, Kristian. 1930. Linguistique balkanique: problèmes et résultats. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2002. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In The handbook of language variation and change, ed. by Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, & Natalie Schilling-Estes, 638-668. Malden, MA / Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sawicka, Irena. 2014. Fonetskite problemi vo arealnata lingvistika (vrz osnova na jazičnata situacija vo jugoistočna Evropa). Skopje: MANU.Google Scholar
Schallert, Joseph. 2017. Conev’s Macedonians: The Aegean Macedonian emigree dialect of Derekjoj/Voden in southeastern Bulgaria. In Proceedings from the Ninth Macedonian-North American Conference on Macedonian Studies, ed. by Friedman, Victor A., Markovikj, Marjan, & Dyer, Donald L., special edition of Balkanistica 30.2.295–321.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1850. Die Sprachen Europas in systematischer Übersicht. Bonn: König.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Oliver Jens (ed.). 2016. Introduction. In The Ottoman conquest of the Balkans: Research questions and interpretations. Interpretations and research debates, ed. by Schmitt, Oliver Jens, 7–45. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1884. Slawo-Deutsches und Slawo-Italienisches. Graz: Leuschner & Lubesnky.Google Scholar
Seliščev, Afanasij M. 1925. Des traits linguistiques communs aux langues balkaniques: un balkanisme ancien en bulgare. Révue des études slaves 5.38–57.Google Scholar
Skok, Petar. 1972. Etimologijski rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika, vol. 1. Zagreb: Jugoslovenska akademija znanosti i umjetnost.Google Scholar
Skok, Petar. 1973. Etimologijski rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika, vol. 3. Zagreb: Jugoslovenska akademija znanosti i umjetnost.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove & Bucak, Sertaç. 1994. Killing a mother tongue – how the Kurds are deprived of linguistic human rights. In Linguistic human rights: Overcoming linguistic discrimination, ed. by Skutnabb-Kanagas, Tove & Philipson, Robert, 347–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sobolev, Andrej N. (ed.). 2009. Malyi dialektologičeskij atlas balkanskih iazykov: Serija leksičeskaja. Tom III: Životnovodstvo. Munich: Biblion Verlag.Google Scholar
Solta, Georg R. 1980. Einführung in die Balkanlinguistik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Substrats und des Balkanlateinischen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2006. All or nothing. In Linguistic areas: Convergence in historical and typological perspective, ed. by Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April, & Vincent, Nigel, 32–50. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1923. Vavilonskaja bašnja i smešenie jazykov. Evrazijskij vremennik 3.107–24.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1930. Proposition 16. In Actes du Premier Congrès International des Linguistes à La Haye, du 10–15 Avril 1928, ed. by de Boer, Cornelis, van Ginneken, Jacobus, & van Hamel, Anton G., 17–18. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Trummer, Manfred. 1983. “Südslavische Sprachgeographie und Balkanlinuistik.” In Ziele und Wege der Balkanlinguistik, ed. by Reiter, Norbert, 245–54. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Tsitsipis, Lukas D. 1998. A linguistic anthropology of praxis and language shift: Arvanítika (Albanian) and Greek in contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuite, Kevin. 1999. The myth of the Caucasian Sprachbund: The case of ergativity. Lingua 108.1–26.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 1998a. Revisiting the Balkan and Meso-American linguistic areas. Language Sciences 20.3.259–70.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 1998b. Conclusions. In Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, ed. by van der Auwera, Johan, 813–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max. 1941. Die Slaven in Griechenland. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Reprinted Leipzig 1970.)Google Scholar
Wace, Alan J.B. & Thompson, Maurice S.. 1914. The Nomads of the Balkans: An account of life and customs among the Vlachs of Northern Pindus. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Wahlström, Max. 2015. Loss of case inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wissemann, Heinz. 1939. Die Syntax der nominalen Determination im Grossrussischen. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Wittek, Paul. 1951/2. Les gagaouzes – gens de Kaykāūs. Rocznik orientalistyczny 17.12–24. (Actually published 1953.)Google Scholar
Woodard, Roger D. 2008. The ancient languages of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ylli, Xhelal. 1997. Die Slavische Lehngut im Albanischen. 1. Teil: Lehnworter. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Ylli, Xhelal. 2000. Die Slavische Lehngut im Albanischen. 2. Teil: Ortsnamen. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
References
Adelaar, W.F.H. 2000. La diversidad lingüística y la extinción de las lenguas. In As línguas amazônicas hoje, ed. by Queixalós, F. & Renault-Lescure, O., 29–38. São Paulo: IRD.Google Scholar
Adelaar, W.F.H. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, W.F.H. 2006. The Quechua impact on Amuesha, an Arawak language of the Peruvian Amazon. In Grammars in contact, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W., 290–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999a. The Arawak language family. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999, 65–105.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999b. Areal diffusion and language contact in the Içana-Vaupés basin, North West Amazonia. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999, 385–415.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2001. Areal diffusion, genetic inheritance and problems of subgrouping: A North Arawak case study. In Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W., 167–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003a. A grammar of Tariana, from north-west Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003b. Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: New morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics 39.1–29.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Semantics and pragmatics of grammatical relations in the Vaupés linguistic area. In Grammars in contact, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W., 237–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2011. Areal features and linguistic areas: Contact-induced change and geographical typology. In Geographical typology and linguistic areas, with special focus on Africa, ed. by Hieda, Osamu, König, Christa, & Nakagawa, Hirosi, 13–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012a. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012b. Invisible loans: How to borrow a bound form. In Morphology: Between copies and cognates, ed. by Johanson, Lars & Robbeets, Martine, 167–85. Leiden: Bril.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Amazonia: Linguistic history. In Encyclopedia of migrations, ed. by Bellwood, Peter, 1.384–91. London: Routledge-Wiley.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2014. Language contact, and language blend: Kumandene Tariana of north-west Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 80.323–70.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. Oxford Bibliography Online: Arawak languages (refereed updateable resource with summaries and evaluation for each entry). General Editor: Mark Aronoff. Available at www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0119.xml.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2018. “Me”, “us” and “others”: Expressing the self in Arawak languages of South America. In Expressing the self: Cultural diversity and cognitive universals, ed. by Huang, Minyao & Jaszczolt, Kasia, 13–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2019a. Bridging linkage in Tariana, an Arawak language of north-west Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 85.455–96.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2019b. A view from the North: Genders and classifiers in Arawak languages of north-west Amazonia. In Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic study, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Mihas, Elena, 103–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W. (eds.). 2006. Grammars in contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Christopher. 2010. Pragmatic multilingualism in the Upper Xingu speech community. In Franchetto 2010, 87–112.Google Scholar
Barnes, Janet. 2009. Tucanoan languages. In Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world, ed. by Brown, Keith & Ogilvie, Sarah, 1091–102. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Basso, Ellen B. 2007. The Kalapalo affinal civility register. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 17.161–83.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Ciucci, Luca. 2012. Parataxis, hypotaxis, and para-hypotaxis in the Zamucoan languages. Linguistic Discovery 10.89–111.Google Scholar
Birchall, Joshua. 2014. Verbal argument marking patterns in South American languages. In The native languages of South America, ed. by O’Connor, L. & Muysken, P., 223–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolaños Quiñónes, Katherine Elizabeth. 2018. Nominalization in Kakua and the Tukanoan influence. Nominalization: STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (Language Typology and Universals) 71.47–72.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. 2006. Feeling the need: The borrowing of Cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). In Aikhenvald & Dixon 2006, 193–266.Google Scholar
Chacon, Thiago. 2013. Kubeo: Linguistic and cultural interactions in the Upper Rio Negro. In Epps & Stenzel 2013b, 403–40.Google Scholar
Chernela, J. 1993. The Wanano Indians of the Brazilian Amazon: A sense of space. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ciucci, Luca. 2014. Trace di contatto tra la famiglia zamuco (ayoreo, chamacoco) e altre lingue del Chaco: prime prospezioni. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 13 n.s.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Golluscio, Lúcia, González, Hebe, & Vidal, Alejandra. 2010. El Chaco como área lingüística. In Estudios de lenguas amerindias. 2. Lenguas indígenas, ed. by Estrada, Z. & Arzapalo, R., 88–130. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Cook, Dorothy M, Gralow, Frances L., & de Young, Carolyn Muller. 2001. Diccionario bilingüe Koreguaje-Español/Español-Koreguaje. Santafé de Bogotá: Editora Alberto Lleras.Google Scholar
Crevels, Mily & van der Voort, Hein. 2008. The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In From linguistic areas to areal linguistics, ed. by Muysken, Pieter, 151–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cruz, Aline da. 2011. Fonologia e Gramática do Nheengatú: A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. Amsterdam: LOT.Google Scholar
Dean, Bartholomew. 2009. Urarina society, cosmology, and history in Peruvian Amazonia. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1987. Morphosyntactic areal characteristics of Amazonian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 53.311–26.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1986. Introduction. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, volume 1, ed. by Derbyshire, D. C. & Pullum, G. K., 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 2004a. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1999a. Introduction. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999b, 1–22.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.). 1999b. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Echeverri, Juan Alvaro. 1997. The people of the center of the world. A study in culture, history and orality in the Colombian Amazon. PhD dissertation, New School for Social Research, New York.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2006a. Growing a numeral system. The historical development of numerals in an Amazonian language family. Diachronica 23.259–88.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2006b. The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In Aikhenvald & Dixon 2006, 267–89.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience and Bolaños, Katherine. 2017. Reconsidering the “Makú” language family of northwest Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 83.467–507.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience & Stenzel, Kristine. 2013a. Introduction. In Epps & Stenzel 2013b, 13–52.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience & Stenzel, Kristine (eds.). 2013b. Upper Rio Negro. Cultural and linguistic interaction in northwestern Amazonia. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional. Museu do Índio – Funai.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. 1986. Falar kuikuro: estudo etnolingüístico de um grupo karibe do Alto Xingu. PhD dissertation, Rio de Janeiro, PPGAS/MN/UFRJ, Volume 2.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. 1995. Processos fonológicos em Kuikúro: uma visão auto-segmental. In Estudos fonológicos das línguas indígenas brasileiras, ed. by Wetzels, L., 53–83. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. 2000. Línguas e história no Alto Xingu. In Franchetto & Heckenberger 2000b, 111–56.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna (ed.). 2010. Alto Xingu. Uma sociedade multilíngue. Rio de Janeiro: Museu do Índio.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna & Heckenberger, Michael. 2000a. Introdução: História e cultura xinguana. In Franchetto & Heckenberger 2000b, 7–20.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna & Heckenberger, Michael (eds.). 2000b. Os povos do Alto Xingu. História e cultura. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.Google Scholar
Galvão, Eduardo. 1960. Áreas culturais do Brasil: 1900–1959. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 8.1–41.Google Scholar
Goldman, I. 1979. The Cubeo: Indians of the Northwest Amazon, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gomez-Imbert, Elsa. 1996. When animals become “rounded” and “feminine”: Conceptual categories and linguistic classification in a multilingual setting. In Rethinking linguistic relativity, ed. by Gumperz, J.J. & Levinson, S.C., 438–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
González, Hebé A. 2015. El Chaco como área lingüística: una evaluación de los rasgos fonológicos. In Language contact and documentation, ed. by Comrie, Bernard & Golluscio, Lucía, 193–266. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gregor, Thomas. 1977. Mehinaku: The drama of daily life in an Upper Xingu village. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine & Rose, Françoise. 2010. Sociative causative markers in South-American languages: A possible areal feature. In Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale. Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, ed. by Floricic, F., 383–402. Lyon: Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon.Google Scholar
Haynie, Hannah, Bowern, Claire, Epps, Patience, Hill, Jane, & McConvell, Patrick. 2014. Wanderwörter in languages of the Americas and Australia. Ampersand 1.1–18.Google Scholar
Heckenberger, Michael J. 1998. Manioc agriculture and sedentism in Amazonia: The Upper Xingu example. Antiquity 72.633–58.Google Scholar
Heckenberger, Michael J. 2000. Estrutura, história e transformação: a cultura xinguana na longue durée, 1000–2000 b.c. In Franchetto & Heckenberger 2000b, 21–62.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Nurse, Derek. 2008. Introduction. In A linguistic geography of Africa, ed. by Heine, Bernd & Nurse, Derek, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hemming, John. 1987. Amazon frontier. The defeat of the Brazilian Indians. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hill, Jonathan D. 2001. The variety of fertility cultism in Amazonia: A closer look at gender symbolism in northwestern Amazonia. In Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia. An exploration of the comparative method, ed. by Gregor, Thomas A. & Tuzin, Donald, 45–68. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, Christine O. 1979. From the Milk River: Spatial and temporal processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, Stephen O. 1979. The Palm and the Pleiades: Initiation and cosmology in Northwest Amazon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1993. Situación actual, tareas y problemas de la clasificación de las lenguas indígenas en Suramérica. In Estado Actual de la Clasificación de las Lenguas Indígenas de Colombia, ed. by de Montes, María Luisa Rodríguez, 25–48. Santafé de Bogotá: Insttuto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Koch-Grünberg, Theodor. 1906b. Die Indianer-Stämme am oberen Rio Negro und Yapurá und ihre sprachliche Zugehörigkeit. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 38.167–205.Google Scholar
Loukotka, Chestmír. 1968. Classification of South American Indian languages. Los Angeles, CA: Latin American Centre, University of California.Google Scholar
Martins, Silvana A. 1994. Análise da morfosintaxe da língua Dâw (Makú-Kamã) e sua classificação tipológica. MA thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Martins, Silvana A. & Martins, Valteir. 1999. Makú. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999b, 251–68.Google Scholar
Martius, Karl F.P. von. 1867. Beiträge zur Ethnographie und Sprachenkunde Amerikas, zumal Brasiliens, 2 vols. Leipzig: Friedrich Fleischer.Google Scholar
Miller, Marion. 1999. Desano grammar. Arlington, VA: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehinaku, Mutua & Franchetto, Bruna. 2015. Tetsualü: The pluralism of languages and people in the Upper Xingu. In Comrie & Golluscio (eds), 146–92.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter, Hammarström, Harald, Birchall, Joshua, van Gijn, Rik, Krasnoukhova, Olga, & Müller, Neele. 2015. Linguistic areas, bottom-up or top-down? The case of the Guaporé-Mamoré. In Comrie & Golluscio (eds), 233–65.Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. E. de. 1975. A terminologia de parentesco Baniwa. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Nova Série, Antropologia, 56.1–34.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon E. 2017. A typology of frustrative marking in Amazonian languages. In The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W., 477–512. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon E. 2019. Parrots, peccaries, and people: Imagery and metaphor in Aguaruna (Chicham) magic songs. International Journal of Language and Culture 6.148–74.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon E. & Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. (eds.). 2018. Nominalization: A view from northwest Amazonia. Special edition of STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 71.1.Google Scholar
Payne, David Lawrence. 1990. Morphological characteristics of lowland South American languages. In Amazonian linguistics. Studies in lowland South American languages, ed. by Payne, D.L., 213–41. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Payne, David Lawrence. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 3, ed. by Derbyshire, D.C. & Pullum, G.K., 355–499. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Henri. 1997. A fala Tukano dos Yepâ-masa. Tomo 1. Gramática. Tomo 2. Dicionário. Tomo 3. Método de aprendizagem. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia CEDEM.Google Scholar
Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo. 1996. Yuruparí. Studies of an Amazonian foundation myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions.Google Scholar
Reinoso Galindo, Andrés Eduardo. 2012. La lengua kawiyarí. Una Aproximación a su fonología y gramática. Saarbrücken: Editoria Académica Española.Google Scholar
Roe, Peter. 1982. The cosmic zygote. Cosmology in the Amazon Basin. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2007. The prehistory of nominal classification in Witotoan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 73.411–45.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2011. Bora loans in Resígario: Massive morphological and little lexical borrowing in a moribund Arawak language. Special edition of Cadernos de Etnolingüística: Série Monografias 2.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank & Payne, Doris L.. 2007. Nominal classification in North West Amazon: Issues in areal diffusion and typological classification. International Journal of American Linguistics 73.381–8.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 1999. The Upper Xingu as an incipient linguistic area. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999b, 417–30.Google Scholar
Silva, Cácio & Silva, Elisângela. 2012. A língua dos Yuhupdeh: introdução etnolíngüística, dicionário Yuhup-Português e glossário semântico-gramatical. São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Pró-Amazônia.Google Scholar
Silverwood-Cope, P.L. 1990. Os Makú. Povo caçador do Noroeste da Amazônia. Brasília: Editora da UNB.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Arthur P. Jr. 1967. Multilingualism in the Northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist 69.670–84. (Reprinted as Sociolinguistics, ed. by J.B. Pride & J. Holmes, 78–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin Modern Linguistics Readings, 1972).Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine. 2008. Kotiria “differential object marking” in cross-linguistic perspective. Amerindia 32.1–29.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine. 2013. Contact and innovation in Vaupés possession-marking categories. In Epps & Stenzel 2013b, 353–402.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine. 2014. A grammar of Kotiria (Wanano). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine & Gomez-Imbert, Elsa. 2018. Evidentiality in Tukanoan languages. In The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 357–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine & Khoo, Velda. 2016. Linguistic hybridity in the Kotiria community. Critical Multilingualism Studies 4.2.75–110.Google Scholar
Stradelli, Ermanno. 1890. Il Vaupes e gli Vaupes. Bolletino della Società Geográfica Italiana, 3rd Ser., 3.425–53.Google Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2000. Is there an “Ethiopian linguistic area”? Anthropological Linguistics 42.329–65.Google Scholar
Urban, Matthias. 2018. The lexical legacy of substrate languages: A test case from the Southern Ecuadorian Highlands. Transactions of the Philological Society 116.435–59.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary. 1985. Introduction. In Animal myths and metaphors in South America, ed. by Urton, Gary, 3–12. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2015. ¿Que tan “amazónicas” son las lenguas kawapana? Contacto con las lenguas centro-andinas y elementos para una área lingüística internedia. Lexus 39.5–26.Google Scholar
Waltz, Nathan & Waltz, C.. 1997. El Agua, La Roca y El Humo. Estudios sobre la cultura wanana del Vaupés. Santafé de Bogotá: Instituto Lingüístico del Verano.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Alva. 1987. Gantëya Bain. El Pueblo Siona del río Putumayo, Colombia. Tomo 1: Etnología, Gramática, Textos. Bogotá: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1976. Apuntes sobre la influencia inca entre los amuesha, factor que oscurece la clasificación de su idioma. Revista del Museo Nacional 42.55–66.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1999. Small language families and isolates in Peru. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999b, 307–40.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 2011. Rastros desconcertantes de contactos entre idiomas y culturas a lo largo de los contrafuertes orientales de los Andes del Perú. In Estudios sobre lenguas Andinas y Amazónicas: homenaje a Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino, ed. by Adelaar, Willem F., Bismarck, Pilar Valenzuela, & Biondi, Roberto Zaqiquiey, 305–16. Lima: Fondo Editorial Ponfiticia. Universidad Católica del Peru.Google Scholar
Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2017. A reference grammar of Murui (Bue), a Witotoan language from northwest Amazonia. PhD thesis, James Cook University.Google Scholar
Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2019. Traversing language barriers. Murui signal drums from Northwest Amazonia. International Journal of Language and Culture 6.195–216.Google Scholar
Wright, Robin M. 2005. História indígena e do indigenismo no Alto Rio Negro. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2015. How strong is the case for contact-induced grammatical restructuring in Quechuan. Linguistic Discovery 13.2.23–36.Google Scholar
References
Adams, Richard. 2000. Introduction to a survey of the Native prehistoric cultures of Mesoamerica. In The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas, vol. 2: Mesoamerica, part 1, ed. by Adams, Richard E.W. & MacLeod, Murdo J., 1–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, W. 1989. Review of Language in the Americas, by Joseph H. Greenberg. Lingua 78.249–55.Google Scholar
Adelaar, W. & Muysken, Pieter. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. In Dixon & Aikhenvald 1999, 65–106.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Amazonia: linguistic history. In The encyclopedia of global human migration, ed. by Ness, Immanuel, 384–91. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Almeida, Fernando Ozorio de & Neves, Eduardo Góes. 2015. Evidências arqueológicas para a origem dos Tupi-Guarani no leste da Amazônia. Mana 21.3.499–525.Google Scholar
Anawalt, Patricia. 1992. Ancient cultural contacts between Ecuador, West Mexico, and the American Southwest: Clothing similarities. Latin American Antiquity 3.2.114–29.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G. & Gillam, J. Christopher. 2000. Paleoindian colonization of the Americas: Implications from an examination of physiography, demography, and artifact distribution. American Antiquity 65.1.43–66.Google Scholar
Antczak, Andrzej, Urbani, Bernardo, & Antczak, Maria Magdalena. 2017. Re-thinking the migration of Cariban-speakers from the Middle Orinoco River to North-Central Venezuela (AD 800). Journal of World Prehistory 30.2.131–75.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Chiara, Sandoval, José, Valqui, Jairo, Shimelman, Aviva, Ziemendorff, Stefan, Schröder, Roland, & Geppert, Maria. 2017. Enclaves of genetic diversity resisted Inca impacts on population history. Scientific Reports 7.1.1–12.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter & Renfrew, Colin (eds.). 2003. Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Birchall, Joshua. 2014. Argument marking patterns in South American languages. PhD thesis, LOT, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Bortolini, Maria-Catira et al. 2003. Y-chromosome evidence for differing ancient demographic histories in the Americas. The American Journal of Human Genetics 73.3.524–39.Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil. 2011. The role of Nahuatl in the formation of Mesoamerica as a linguistic area. Language Dynamics and Change 1.2.171–204.Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil et al. 2013. The paleobiolinguistics of domesticated manioc (Manihot esculenta). Ethnobiology Letters 4.61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil et al. 2014. The paleobiolinguistics of Maize (Zea mays L.). Ethnobiology Letters 5.52.Google Scholar
Bueno, Lucas. 2011. L’occupation Initiale du Brésil dans une perspective macro-régionale: les cas des régions de l’Amazonie, du Nordest et du Brésil. In Peuplements et Prehistoire de l’Amerique (Editions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, coll. Documents Préhistoriques, 28), ed. by D. Vialou, 209–20. Aubervilliers: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques.Google Scholar
Bueno, Lucas, Dias, Adriana Schmidt, & Steele, James. 2013. The Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene archaeological record in Brazil: A geo-referenced database. Quaternary International 301.74–93.Google Scholar
Cabral, Ana Suelly De Arruda Camara. 1995. Contact-induced language change in the Western Amazon: The non-genetic origin of the Kokama language. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1988. Review of Language in the Americas by Joseph H. Greenberg. Language 64.591–615.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 4). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2003. What drives linguistic diversification and language spread? In Bellwood & Renfrew 2003, 49–64.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2016. Comparative linguistics of Mesoamerican languages today. Veleia 33.113–34.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence, & Smith-Stark, Thomas. 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62.3.530.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Kaufman, Terrence. 1976. A linguistic look at the Olmecs. American Antiquity 41.1.80–9.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Grondona, Verónica María (eds.). 2012. The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide (The World of Linguistics 2). Berlin & Boston, MA: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Poser, William J.. 2008. Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. & Boven, Karin. 2002. The native population: Migrations and identities. In Atlas of the languages of Suriname, ed. by Carlin, Eithne B. & Arends, Jacques, 11–45. Leiden and Kingston: KITLV Press and Ian Randle.Google Scholar
Carvajal, Gaspar de. 1934 [1541]. Carvajal’s account. In The discovery of the Amazon according to the account of Friar Gaspar de Carvajal and other documents, ed. by Medina, J.T., 167–235. New York: American Geographical Society.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Fernando. 2018. Arawakan–Guaicuruan language contact in the South American Chaco. International Journal of American Linguistics 84.2.243–63.Google Scholar
Chacon, Thiago. 2017. Arawakan and Tukanoan contacts in Northwest Amazonia prehistory. PAPIA 27.2.237–65.Google Scholar
Chard, Chester. 1950. Pre-Columbian trade between North and South America. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 1.1–27.Google Scholar
Constenla-Umaña, Adolfo. 1991. Las lenguas del área intermedia: introducción a su estudio areal. San José: Universidad de Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Constenla-Umaña, Adolfo. 2012. Chibchan languages. In Campbell & Grondona 2012. 391–440.Google Scholar
Dakin, Karen. 2003. Uto-Aztecan in the linguistic stratigraphy of Mesoamerican prehistory. In Current issues in linguistic theory, ed. by Andersen, Henning, 259–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Danielsen, Swintha, Dunn, Michael, & Muysken, Pieter. 2011. The spread of the Arawakan languages: A view from structural phylogenetics. In Hornborg & Hill 2011b, 173–95.Google Scholar
Davis, Irvine. 1968. Some Macro-Je relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics 34.1.42–7.Google Scholar
Davletshin, Albert. 2012. Proto-Uto-Aztecans on their way to the Proto-Aztecan homeland: Linguistic evidence. Journal of Language Relationship 8.75–92.Google Scholar
Denevan, W. 1992. The pristine myth: The landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82.3.369–85.Google Scholar
Dias, A.S. & Bueno, Lucas. 2014. The initial colonization of South America Eastern Lowlands: Brazilian archaeology contributions to settlement of America models. In Paleoamerican odyssey, ed. by Graf, Kelly, Ketron, Caroline, & Waters, Michael, 339–57. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University PressGoogle Scholar
Dillehay, T. 2009. Probing deeper into First American studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106.4.971–8.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds.). 1999. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksen, L. 2011. Nature and culture in prehistoric Amazonia: Using G.I.S. to reconstruct ancient ethnogenetic processes from archaeology, linguistics, geography, and ethnohistory. Thesis, Human Ecology Division, Lund University.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Jo-Anne S. & Alleyne, Mervyn C.. 2007. Comparative perspectives on the origins, development and structure of Amazonian (Karipúna) French Creole. In Creole language library, vol. 32 ed. by Huber, Magnus & Velupillai, Viveka, 325–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 2013. North America: Eskimo-Aleut linguistic history. In The encyclopedia of global human migration, ed. by Ness, Immanuel, xx–yy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 1983. Some lexical clues to Uto-Aztecan prehistory. International Journal of American Linguistics 49.3.224–57.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 2011. Numic migration? Ethnographic evidence revisited. In Rethinking anthropological perspectives on migration, ed. by Cabana, Graciela S. & Clark, Jeffery J., 191–206. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Gassón, Rafael. 2002. Orinoquia: The archaeology of the Orinoco River Basin. Journal of World Prehistory 16.3.237–311.Google Scholar
Gassón, Rafael. 2014. Blind men and an elephant: Exchange systems and sociopolitical organizations in the Orinoco Basin and neighboring areas in pre-Hispanic times. In Against typological tyranny in archaeology, ed. by Gnecco, Cristóbal & Langebaek, Carl, 25–42. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 2012. Linguistic studies in the Cariban family. In Campbell & Grondona 2012, 441–94.Google Scholar
González, J.R., Bortolini, M.C., Santos, F.R., & Bonatto, S.L.. 2008. The peopling of America: Craniofacial shape variation on a continental scale and its interpretation from an interdisciplinary view. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 137.175–87.Google Scholar
Granberry, Julian & Vescelius, Gary S.. 2004. Languages of the pre-Columbian Antilles. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert, & Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. Glottolog 3.3. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. (Available online at http://glottolog.org, accessed August 31, 2018.)Google Scholar
Haynes, G.A. 2002. The early settlement of North America: The Clovis era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haynie, Hannah, Bowern, Claire, Epps, Patience, Hill, Jane, & McConvell, Patrick. 2014. Wanderwörter in languages of the Americas and Australia. Ampersand 1.1–18.Google Scholar
Heckenberger, M. 2013. The Arawak diaspora. In The Oxford handbook of Caribbean archaeology, ed. by Keegan, William & Ramos, Reniel Rodríguez, 1–18. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heckenberger, M. & Neves, Eduardo Góes. 2009. Amazonian archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 38.1.251–66.Google Scholar
Heggarty, Paul. 2008. Linguistics for archaeologists: A case-study in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18.1.35–56.Google Scholar
Heggarty, Paul. 2014. Prehistory through language and archaeology. In Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, ed. by Bowern, Claire & Evans, Bethwyn, 598–626. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2001. Proto-Uto-Aztecan: A community of cultivators in Central Mexico? American Anthropologist 103.4.913–34.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2003. Proto-Uto-Aztecan and the northern devolution. In Bellwood & Renfrew 2003, 331–40.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. & Merrill, William L.. 2017. Uto-Aztecan maize agriculture: A linguistic puzzle from southern California. Anthropological Linguistics 59.1.1–23.Google Scholar
Hill, Jonathan & Santos-Granero, Fernando (eds.). 2002. Comparative Arawakan histories: Rethinking language family and culture area in Amazonia. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, B. 1994. Island Carib, an Arawakan language which incorporated a lexical register of Carib origin, used to address men. In Mixed Languages, ed. by Bakker, P. & Mous, M., 161–8. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.Google Scholar
Hoff, B. 1995. Language contact, war, and Amerindian historical tradition. The special case of the Island Carib. In Wolves from the sea. Readings in the anthropology of the Native Caribbean, ed. by Whitehead, Neil. L., 37–59. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy & Coronel-Molina, Serafín. 2004. Quechua language shift, maintenance, and revitalization in the Andes: The case for language planning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 167.9–68.Google Scholar
Hornborg, Alf. 2005. Ethnogenesis, regional integration, and ecology in prehistoric Amazonia: Toward a system perspective. Current Anthropology 46.4.589–620.Google Scholar
Hornborg, Alf & Hill, Jonathan D.. 2011a. Introduction: ethnicity in ancient Amazonia. In Hornborg & Hill 2011b, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hornborg, Alf & Hill, Jonathan D. (eds.). 2011b. Ethnicity in ancient Amazonia. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Hosler, Dorothy. 1988. Ancient west Mexican metallurgy: South and Central American origins and west Mexican transformations. American Anthropologist 90.4.832–55.Google Scholar
Huttar, George L. & Velantie, F.J.. 1997. Ndyuka-Trio Pidgin. In Contact languages: A wider perspective, ed. by Thomason, Sarah, 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
INEGI. 2000. XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000. México, INEGI. (Available at www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/Proyectos/ccpv/cpv2000/default.aspx, accessed on August 28, 2018.)Google Scholar
Johnson, John & Lorenz, Joseph. 2006. Genetics, linguistics, and prehistoric migrations: An analysis of California Indian mitochondrial DNA lineages. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 26.1.33–64.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 2017. Aspects of the lexicon of Proto-Mayan and its earliest descendants. In The Mayan languages, ed. by Aissen, Judith, England, Nora C., & Maldonado, Roberto Zavala, 62–111. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence, & Justeson, John. 2009. Historical linguistics and pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamerica 20.2.221–31.Google Scholar
Kemp, B., Gonzalez-Oliver, A., Malhi, R., Monroe, C., Schroeder, K.B., McDonough, J., & Rhett, G.. 2010. Evaluating the farming/language dispersal hypothesis with genetic variation exhibited by populations in the Southwest and Mesoamerica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107.15.6759–64.Google Scholar
Malhi, Ripan, Mortensen, Holly, Eshleman, Jason, Kemp, Brian, Lorenz, Joseph, Kaestle, Frederika, Johnson, John, Gorodezky, Clara, & Smith, David. 2003. Native American mtDNA prehistory in the American Southwest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 120.2.108–24.Google Scholar
Madsen, David B. 2015. A framework for the initial occupation of the Americas. PaleoAmerica 1.3.217–50.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 2011. The language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Matson, R.G. & Magne, M.P.R.. 2013. North America: Na Dene/Athapaskan archaeology and linguistics. In The encyclopedia of global human migration, ed. by Ness, Immanuel, xx–yy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Meira, Márcio. 2017. A persistência do aviamento: colonialsimo e história indígena no noroeste Amazônico. Rio de Janeiro: Unirio.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio. 2006. Cariban languages. In Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 2nd ed., vol. 2, ed. by Brown, Keith, 199–203. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Drude, Sebastian. 2015. A summary reconstruction of Proto-Maweti-Guarani segmental phonology. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 10.2.275–96.Google Scholar
Meira, Sergio & Franchetto, Bruna. 2005. The southern Cariban languages and the Cariban family. International Journal of American Linguistics 71.127–92.Google Scholar
Meira, Sergio & Muysken, Pieter. 2017. Cariban in contact: New perspectives on Trio-Ndyuka Pidgin. In Boundaries and bridges: Language contact in multilingual ecologies, ed. by Yakpo, Kofi & Muysken, Pieter, 197–228. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Melatti, Julio. 2017. Áreas etnográficas da américa indígena. Available at www.juliomelatti.pro.br/areas/00areas.pdf, accessed January 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Mello, Antônio & Kneip, Andreas. 2017. Novas evidências linguísticas (e algumas arqueológicas) que apontam para a origem dos povos Tupi-Guarani no leste Amazônico. Literatura y Lingüística 36.299–312.Google Scholar
Merrill, W. 2012. The historical linguistics of Uto-Aztecan agriculture. Anthropological Linguistics 54.3.203–60.Google Scholar
Merrill, W. 2013. The genetic unity of Southern Uto-Aztecan. Language Dynamics and Change 3.68–104.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2014. On the pre-Columbian origin of Proto-Omagua-Kokama. Journal of Language Contact 7.2.309–44.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev, Chousou-Polydouri, N., Bartolomei, K., Donnelly, E., Wauters, V., Meira, S., & O’Hagan, Z.. 2015. A Bayesian phylogenetic classification of Tupí-Guaraní. LIAMES 15.2.193–221.Google Scholar
Montes, María Luisa Rodríguez. 2016. Onomástica Muzocolima en Cundinarmarca y Boyacá. Lingüística y Literatura 37.69.xx–yy.Google Scholar
Moreno-Estrada, Andrés, Gravel, Simon, Zakharia, Fouad, McCauley, Jacob, Byrnes, Jake, Gignoux, Christopher, & Ortiz-Tello, Patricia. 2013. Reconstructing the population genetic history of the Caribbean. PLoS Genetics 9.1.e1003925.Google Scholar
Murra, John. 1972 El “control vertical” de un máximo de pisos ecológicos en la economia de las sociedades andinas. In Visita de la Provincia de Leon de Huanuco en 1562, ed. by Murra, John, 427–76. Huanuco: Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizan.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1997a. Callahuaya. In Creole language library, vol. 17, ed. by Thomason, Sarah G., 427–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1997b. Media Lengua. In Contact languages: A wider perspective, ed. by Thomason, Sarah, 365–426. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2009. Kallawaya. In Lenguas de Boliva: Ambito Andino, ed. by Crevels, Mily & Muysken, Pieter, 147–67. La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2012. Contacts between indigenous languages in South America. In Campbell & Grondona 2012, 235–58.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2013. Media Lengua. In Contact languages based on languages from Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Americas, ed. by Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin, & Huber, Magnus, 143–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. 1999. Linguistic diversity of the Americas can be reconciled with a recent colonization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96.6.3325–9.Google Scholar
Neves, W., Araujo, A., Bernardo, D., Kipnis, R., & Feathers, J.. 2012. Rock art at the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary in eastern South America. PLoS ONE 7.2.e32228.Google Scholar
Neves, Eduardo. 2013. Was agriculture a key productive activity in pre-colonial Amazonia? The stable productive basis for social equality in the Central Amazon. In Human–environment interactions: Current and future directions, ed. by Brondízio, Eduardo S. & Moran, Emilio F., 371–88. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1990. Linguistic diversity and the first settlement of the New World. Language 66.3.475.Google Scholar
Nimuendajú, Curt. 1926. Galibi do Uaça. In Die Palikur-Indianer und ihre Nachbarn, ed. by Göteborg, Elanders, 141–3. Gothenburg: Elanders.Google Scholar
Noelli, Francisco Silva. 2008. The Tupi expansion. In Silverman & Isbell 2008, 659–70.Google Scholar
Noguera-Santamaría, Maria Claudia, Anderson, Carl Edlund, Uricoechea, Daniel, Durán, Clemencia, Briceño-Balcázar, Ignacio, & Bernal-Villegas, Jaime. 2015. Mitochondrial DNA analysis suggests a Chibchan migration into Colombia. Universitas Scientiarum 20.2.261.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Loretta. 2014. Structural features and language contact in the Isthmo-Colombian area. In O’Connor & Muysken 2014, 73–101.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Loretta, & Muysken, Pieter (eds.). 2014. The native languages of South America: Origins, development, typology. Cambridge & New York Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oka, Rahul & Kusimba, Chapurukha. 2008. The archaeology of trading systems, part 1: Towards a new trade synthesis. Journal of Archaeological Research 16.4.339–95.Google Scholar
Oliver, José R. 2008. The archaeology of agriculture in ancient Amazonia. In Silverman & Isbell 2008, 185–216.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris. 1990a. Morphological characteristics of Amazonian languages. In Doris Payne (1990b), 213–41.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris (ed.). 1990b. Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 3, ed. by Derbyshire, Desmond & Pullum, Geoffrey, 355–499. Berlin & Boston, MA: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
QGIS Development Team (2018). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available at http://qgis.osgeo.org.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Henri. 2001. Línguas Arawak da Amazônia Setentrional: comparação e descrição. Manaus: EDUA.Google Scholar
Reich, David et al. 2012. Reconstructing Native American population history. Nature 488.7411.370–4.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1992. Archaeology, genetics and linguistic diversity. Man 27.3.445–78.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, E. 2006. Macro-Jê. In Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 2nd ed., vol. 7, ed. by Brown, Keith, 422–6. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, E. & van der Voort, Hein. 2010. Nimuendajú was right: The inclusion of the Jabutí language family in the Macro-Jê stock. International Journal of American Linguistics 76.4.517–70.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1964. Classificação do tronco lingüístico Tupi. Revista de Antropologia 12.99–104.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1985a. Evidence for Tupi–Carib relationships. In South American Indian languages: Retrospect and prospect, ed. by Klein, H. & Stark, L., 371–404. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1985b. Relações internas na família Tupí-Guaraní. Revista de Antropologia 27.33–53.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1996. As Línguas Gerais Sul-Americanas. PAPIA: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos E Similares 4.2.6–18.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 2000. “Ge–Pano–Carib” X “Jê–Tupí–Karib”: sobre relaciones lingüísticas prehistóricas en Sudamérica. In Actas del I Congreso de Lenguas Indígenas de Sudamérica, vol. 1, ed. by Miranda, L., 95–104. Lima: Universidad Ricardo Palma, Facultad de Lenguas Modernas.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. & Dietrich, Wolf. 1997. On the linguistic relationship between Mawé and Tupí-Guaraní. Diachronica International Journal for Historical Linguistics 14.2.265–304.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise. 2012. Borrowing of a Cariban number marker into three Tupi-Guarani languages. In Morphologies in contact, ed. by Vanhove, Martine, Stolz, Thomas, Urdze, Aina, & Otsuka, Hitomi, 37–69. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Rostain, Stéphen. 2008. Agricultural earthworks on the French Guiana coast. In Silverman & Isbell 2008, 217–33.Google Scholar
Rothhammer, Francisco, Fehren-Schmitz, Lars, Puddu, Giannina, & Capriles, José. 2017. Mitochondrial DNA haplogroup variation of contemporary mixed South Americans reveals prehistoric displacements linked to archaeologically-derived culture history. American Journal of Human Biology 29.6.e23029.Google Scholar
Rouse, I. 1992. The Taínos: Rise and decline of the people who greeted Columbus. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Salanova, Andres. to appear. The Macro-Jê languages. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, ed by. Epps, Patience & Michael, Lev. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sandoval, José R. et al. 2016. The genetic history of Peruvian Quechua-Lamistas and Chankas: Uniparental DNA patterns among autochthonous Amazonian and Andean populations. Annals of Human Genetics 80.2.88–101.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Karla et al. 2012. Y-chromosome diversity in Native Mexicans reveals continental transition of genetic structure in the Americas. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 148.3.395–405.Google Scholar
Santos, Eduardo José Melo dos et al. 2015. Origins and demographic dynamics of Tupí expansion: A genetic tale. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 10.2.217–28.Google Scholar
Santos-Granero, F. 2002. The Arawakan matrix: Ethos, language, and history in native South America. In Hill & Santos-Granero 2002, 25–50.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Max. 1917. Die Aruaken: Ein Beitrag zum Problem der Kulturverbreitung (Studien zur Ethnologie und Soziologie, Heft 1). Leipzig: Veit & Comp. (Available in a Portuguese translation at: www.etnolinguistica.org/biblio:schmidt-1917-aruaques, accessed August 27, 2018.)Google Scholar
Schroeder, Hannes et al. 2018. Origins and genetic legacies of the Caribbean Taíno. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115.10.2341–6.Google Scholar
Sharer, Robert J., Sharer, Robert J., Balkansky, Andrew K., Burton, James H., Feinman, Gary M., Flannery, Kent V., Grove, David C., Marcus, Joyce, Moyle, Robert G., Price, T. Douglas, Redmond, Eisa M., Reynolds, Robert G., Rice, Prudence M., Spencer, Charles S., Stoltman, James B., & Yaeger, Jason. 2006. On the logic of archaeological inference: Early formative pottery and the evolution of Mesoamerican societies. Latin American Antiquity 17.1.90–103.Google Scholar
Silverman, Helaine & Isbell, William (eds.). 2008. Handbook of South American archaeology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 84.3–31.Google Scholar
Skoglund, Pontus et al. 2015. Genetic evidence for two founding populations of the Americas. Nature 525.104–8.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 2010. Trading patterns, ancient American. In The Berkshire encyclopedia of world history, ed. by McNeill, William Hardy, Bentley, Jerry H., & Christian, David, 2nd ed. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Pub. Group.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 2011. The Aztecs, 3rd ed. (The Peoples of America). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tarazona-Santos, Eduardo et al. 2001 Genetic fifferentiation in South Amerindians is related to environmental and cultural diversity: Evidence from the Y chromosome. The American Journal of Human Genetics 68.6.1485–96.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1992. A história da cultura brasileira segundo as línguas nativas. In História dos índios no Brasil, ed. by da Cunha, Manuela Carneiro, 87–102. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik. 2014. The Andean foothills and adjacent Amazonian fringe. In O’Connor & Muysken 2014, 102–25.Google Scholar
Viegas Barros, Pedro J. 2001. Evidencias Del Parentesco de Las Lenguas Lule y Vilela. Colección Folklore y Antropología, vol. 4: Colección Folklore y Antropología. Santa Fe: Subsecretaría de Cultura, Dirección Provincial de Gestión Cultural: Santa Fe: Subsecretaría de la Provincia de Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Vieira, Padre Antônio. 1662. Sermão da Epifania. Available at www.literaturabrasileira.ufsc.br/documentos/?action=download&id=49782, accessed August 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Walker, R.S. & Ribeiro, L.A.. 2011. Bayesian phylogeography of the Arawak expansion in lowland South America. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (Biological Sciences) 278.1718.2562–7.Google Scholar
Waters, Michael R. 2019. Late Pleistocene exploration and settlement of the Americas by modern humans. Science 365.6449.1–9.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Ward & Whiteley, Peter. 2015. Historical linguistics as a sequence optimization problem: The evolution and biogeography of Uto-Aztecan languages. Cladistics 31.2.113–25.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Neil. 2002. Arawak linguistics and cultural identity through time: contact, colonialism, and creolization. In Hill & Santos-Granero 2002, 51–73.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren. 2018. Neolithic linguistics. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.800.3739&rep=rep1&type=pdf, accessed August 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Wilson, Samuel Meredith. 2007. The archaeology of the Caribbean (Cambridge World Archaeology). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zamponi, Raoul. 2020. Some precontact widespread lexical forms in the languages of Greater Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 86.4.527–73.Google Scholar
Zizumbo-Villarreal, Daniel & Colunga-GarcíaMarín, Patricia. 2010. Origin of agriculture and plant domestication in West Mesoamerica. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57.6.813–25.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Alberta. 1985. Evidencias arqueológicas sobre posibles grupos de lenguas Caribe. Antropológica 63–4.23–44.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Alberta. 2002. A new model of the northern Arawakan expansion. In Hill & Santos-Granero 2002, 199–222.Google Scholar
References
Abbi, Anvita. 2013. A grammar of the Great Andamanese language: An ethnolinguistic study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Abbi, Anvita. 2016b. The situation in India and adjacent areas. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 632–7.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D.S. (ed.). 2008. The Munda languages. Oxford & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2016. Austroasiatic languages of South Asia. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 107–30.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D.S., Gomango, Opino, & Dangada-Majhi, Sonia. n.d. Remo talking dictionary. Available at http://remo.swarthmore.edu.Google Scholar
Arora, Harbir. 2004. Syntactic convergence: The case of Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu. Delhi: University of Delhi.Google Scholar
Barua, Bimala Kanta & Deodhai Phukan, N.N.. 1964. Ahom lexicons, based on original Tai manuscripts. Guwahati: Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies. (Second edition, 1991.)Google Scholar
Bergunder, Michael. 2002. Umkämpfte Vergangenheit: Anti-brahmanische und hindu-nationalistische Rekonstruktionen der frühen indischen Religionsgeschichte. In “Arier” und “Draviden” (Hallesche Berichte, 2), ed. by Bergunder, Michael & Das, Rahul Peter, 135–80. Halle: Verlag der Franckeschen Stiftungen.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2008. Indian English: Syntax. In Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia, ed. by Mesthrie, Rajend, 547–62. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules. 1924–5. Sanskrit et dravidien. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 25.1.1–21. (English translation in Pre-Aryan and pre-Dravidian in India, ed. and trans. by P.C. Bagchi, 35–62. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 1929.)Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules. 1929. Some problems of Indo-Aryan philology. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies 5.719–56.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules. 1934. L’indo-aryen du véda aux temps modernes. Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve. (English translation by A. Master, with retention of 1934 pagination in the margin. Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve, 1965.)Google Scholar
Bühler, George. 1864. On the origin of the Sanskrit linguals. Madras Journal of Literature and Science, No. I, Third Series, 116–36.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, Dilip K. 1997. Colonial indology: Sociopolitics of the ancient Indian past. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana & Lester, Nicholas. 2016. Contact and convergence in the northeast. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 300–9.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dua, Hans Raj. 2001. Science policy, education, and language planning. Mysore: Yashoda Publications.Google Scholar
Ellis, Francis W. 1816. Note on the introduction. In Grammar of the Teloogoo language, ed. by Campbell, A.D., xx–yy. Madras: College [of Fort St. George] Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32.3–16. (Reprinted in Emeneau 1980a: 105–25.)Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1965. India and historical grammar (Annamalai University Publications in Linguistics 5). Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1980a. Language and linguistic area, essays selected by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1989. The language of the Nilgiris. In Blue mountains: The ethnography and biogeography of a South Indian region, ed. by Hockings, Paul, 133–43. Delhi & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1976a. The devil’s case: PIE as Type II. In Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg, ed. by Juilland, Alphonse, 463–80. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2016. The Tibeto-Burman languages of South Asia. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 130–55.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Wilson, Robert. 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border. In Pidginization and creolization of languages, ed. by Hymes, Dell, 151–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1975. Substratum influence on (Rig Vedic) Sanskrit? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 5.2.76–125.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1984. (Pre-)Rig-Vedic convergence of Indo-Aryan with Dravidian? Another look at the evidence. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 14.1.89–107.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (Second edition, 1991.)Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1996a. Pre-Ṛgvedic convergence between Indo-Aryan (Sanskrit) and Dravidian? A survey of the issues and controversies. In Ideology and status of Sanskrit: Contributions to the history of the Sanskrit language, ed. by Houben, J.E.M., 17–58. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1996b. Subversion or convergence? The issue of pre-Vedic retroflexion reconsidered. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 23.2.73–115.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1999. Out of India? The linguistic evidence. In Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, interpretation, and ideology (Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora, 3), ed. by Bronkhorst, Johannes & Deshpande, Madhav M., 1–18. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2000. South Asia: Historical. In The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, ed. by Singh, Rajendra, 220–37. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2015a. The northwest of South Asia and beyond: The issue of Indo-Aryan retroflexion yet again. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2.1.111–35.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2015b. Proto-Indo-European verb finality: Reconstruction, typology, validation. In Proto-Indo-European syntax and its development, ed. by Kulikov, Leonid & Lavidas, Nikolaos, 51–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2015c. Yamuna Kachru’s contributions to South Asian discourse and convergence studies. World Englishes 34.1.68–77.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016a. Daic or Tai languages of South Asia. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 155–7.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016b. English and South Asian languages. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 325–32.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016e. Other contact, regional and local. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 309–25.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016f. Post-Vedic contact linguistics. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 260–3.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016g. Structural features and geography. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 256–60.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Bashir, Elena (eds.). 2016. The languages and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide. Berlin & Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Joseph, Brian D.. 2009. Language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics, 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hutton, J.H. 1933. Census of India, 1931, vol. 1, part 1. Delhi: Manager of Publications.Google Scholar
Irschick, Eugene. 1969. Political and social conflict in South India: The non-Brahmin movement and Tamil separatism 1916–1929. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jha, N. & Rajaram, Navaratna Srinivasa. 2000. The deciphered Indus script: Methodology, readings, interpretations. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.Google Scholar
Sir Jones, William. 1786. The third anniversary discourse, delivered 2nd February 1786: On the Hindus. Published 1789 in Asiatick Researches 1.415–31.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1969. English in South Asia. In Current trends in linguistics, vol. 5, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas A., Emeneau, Murray B., & Ferguson, Charles A., 627–78. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1983. The Indianization of English: The English language in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1990. The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. (ed.). 1992. The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 2017. World Englishes and culture wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1989. Corpus planning for modernization: Sanskritization and Englishization of Hindi. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19.1.153–64.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1992. The Indian face of Indian English: Speech acts in the other tongue. Seminar 43–6.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 2003. Conventions of politeness in plural societies. In Anglophone cultures in South-East Asia: Appropriations, continuities, contexts, ed. by Ahrens, Rüdiger, Parker, David, Stierstorfer, Klaus, & Tam, Kowk-Kan, 39–53. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 2020. Speaking and writing in World Englishes. In The handbook of World Englishes, ed. by Nelson, Cecil L., Proshina, Zoya G., & Davis, Daniel R., 349–67. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kindersley, A.F. 1938. Notes on the Indian idiom of English: Style, syntax, and vocabulary. Transactions of the Philological Society 37.25–34.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian languages: A comparative, historical and typological study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kulkarni-Joshi, Sonal. 2016. Forty years of language contact and change in Kupwar: A critical assessment of the intertranslatability model. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 3.2.147–74.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. 1835. Minute of 2 February 1835 on Indian Education. Published 1957 in Macaulay, prose and poetry, selected by Young, G.M., 721–4, 729. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Misra, S.S. 1992. The Aryan problem: A linguistic approach. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2002. The study and revival of the Ahom language. Indian Journal of Tai Studies 2.89–103.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2007. [Language documentation recordings of Ahom.] Available at www.language-archives.org/item/oai:paradisec.org.au:SDM04–2007.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2014. Ahom and Tangsa: Case studies of language maintenance and loss in North East India. In Language endangerment and preservation in India, ed. by Hugo C. Cardoso, special edition of Language Documentation & Conservation 7.46–77.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2005. Globalization and the myth of killer languages: What’s really going on? In Perspectives on endangerment, ed. by Huggan, Graham & Klasen, Stephan, 19–48. New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Globalization and the myth of killer languages: What’s really going on? In Language evolution: Contact, competition and change, by Mufwene, Salikoko S., chapter 12. London & New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Müller, Friedrich Max. 1847. On the relation of the Bengali and the Arian and aboriginal languages in India. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 17.319–50.Google Scholar
Murugaiyan, A. & Pilot-Raichoor, Christiane. 2004. Les prédications indifférenciées en dravidien: témoins d’une évolution typologique archaïque. In Les constituants prédicatifs et la diversité des langues, ed. by François, J. & Behr, I., 155–77. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Nadkarni, Mangesh V. 1975. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language 51.672–83.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2003. Recent language contact in the Nepal Himalaya. In Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, ed. by Bradley, David, 65–88. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Jay, Isabel Cajori, Hoshino, Risa, Hasbun, Sara Maria, Sowemimo-Coker, Chantal, & Krauss, Robert M.. 2013. Influence of role switching on phonetic convergence in conversation. Discourse Processes 50.4.276–300.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 2010. Language contact in Jharkhand: Linguistic convergence between Munda and Indo-Aryan in eastern-central India. Himalayan Linguistics 9.2.56–86.Google Scholar
Pilot-Raichoor, Christiane. 2012. Tamil Brahmi inscriptions: A critical landmark in the history of the Dravidian language. In New dimensions in Tamil epigraphy: A multi-disciplinary approach, ed. by Murugaiyan, A., 285–315. Chennai: Cre-A publishers.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich. 1833–6. Etymologische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, 2 vols. Lemgo: Meyer.Google Scholar
Pray, Bruce R. 1980. Evidence of grammatical convergence in Dakhini Urdu and Telugu. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 90–9.Google Scholar
Purandhare, Vaibhav. 2015. Ban English, says Jnanpith winner, hits out at Naipaul and Rushdie. The Times of India (February 6). (Available at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Ban-English-says-Jnanpith-winner-hits-out-at-Naipaul-and-Rushdie/articleshow/46149589.cms).Google Scholar
Puri, Vandana. 2011. The influence of English on the history of Hindi relative clauses. Journal of Language Contact 4.250–68.Google Scholar
Ramesh, B. S. 2008. The language policy issue continues to boil. The Hindu (July 16). (Available at www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/The-language-policy-issue-continues-to-boil/article15261952.ece).Google Scholar
Rask, H.K. (ed.). 1834. Samlede tildels forhen utrykte afhandlinger af R.K. Rask, vol. 1. Copenhagen: Det Poppske Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Harold F. 2016. Language policy and language planning in South Asia. In Hock & Bashir 2016, 645–56.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Jim G. 1984. The Indo-Aryan invasions: Cultural myth and archaeological reality. In The people of South Asia: The biological anthropology of India, Pakistan, and Nepal, ed. by Lukacs, John R., 77–90. New York & London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Jim G. & Lichtenstein, Diane A.. 1999. Migration, philology and South Asian archæology. In Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, interpretation and ideology (Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora, 3), ed. by Bronkhorst, Johannes & Deshpande, Madhav M., 239–60. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 2002. Language policies and education: The role of education in destroying or supporting the world’s linguistic diversity. World Congress on Language Policies. Barcelona. 16–20 April. Available at www.linguapax.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CMPL2002_Plenari_TSkutnabb-Kangas.pdf.Google Scholar
Snell, Rupert. 1993. The hidden hand: English lexis, syntax and idiom as determinants of Modern Hindi usage. In Institutions and ideologies: A SOAS South Asia reader, ed. by Arnold, David & Robb, Peter, 74–90. Richmond: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Swarajya Lakshmi, V. 1984. Urdu influence on Telugu. Hyderabad: Department of Linguistics, Osmania University.Google Scholar
Talageri, S.G. 1993. Aryan invasion theory and Indian nationalism. New Delhi: Voice of India.Google Scholar
Talageri, S.G. 2008. The Rigveda and the Avesta: The final evidence. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1987. The Sanskrit gerund: A synchronic, diachronic, and typological analysis (Studia Orientalia 62). Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1988. On Burushaski and other ancient substrata in northwestern South Asia. Studia Orientalia 64.303–25.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1999. Archaeological–linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia. In Archaeology and language IV: Language change and cultural transformation, ed. by Blench, Roger & Spriggs, Matthew, 138–48. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil. 2008. Some areal phonological isoglosses in the transit zone between South and Central Asia. In Proceedings of the Third International Hindu Kush Cultural Conference (Chitral, 26–30 September, 1995), ed. by Israr-ud-Din, 250–62. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vivekananda, Swami. 1897. The future of India. Published 1908 in Lectures from Colombo to Almora, 101–11. Almora: Prabuddha Bharata Press.Google Scholar
Yule, Henry & Burnell, A.C.. 1886. Hobson-Jobson: A glossary of colloquial Anglo-Indian words and phrases, and of kindred terms, etymological, historical, geographical, and discursive. London: John Murray. (Second edition, ed. by William Crooke. London: John Murray, 1903.)Google Scholar