Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Maps Volume II
- Figures Volume II
- Tables Volume II
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part One Multilingualism
- Part Two Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification
- Part Three Lingua Francas
- Part Four Language Vitality
- Part Five Contact and Language Structures
- Author Index
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
Part Three - Lingua Francas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 June 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Maps Volume II
- Figures Volume II
- Tables Volume II
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part One Multilingualism
- Part Two Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification
- Part Three Lingua Francas
- Part Four Language Vitality
- Part Five Contact and Language Structures
- Author Index
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language ContactVolume 2: Multilingualism in Population Structure, pp. 401 - 452Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Adelaar, Willem & Muysken, Pieter. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arthus, Gothard. 1974 [1614]. Dialogues in the English and Malaiane languages. Amsterdam: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum & Norwood, NJ: Walter J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Bae, Chui-Hun. 2014. Aramaic as a lingua franca during the Persian Empire (538–333 BCE). Journal of Universal Language 1.1–20.Google Scholar
Beverley, Robert. 2013 [1705]. The history and present state of Virginia, ed. Parrish, Susan Scott. Chapel Hill, NC: Omohundro Institute.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1987. Lingüística quechua. Cuzco: Centro de estudios rurales andinos “Bartolomé de las Casas.”Google Scholar
Ferrand, Gabriel. 1924. L’élément persan dans les textes nautiques arabes de XVe et XVIe siècles. Journal asiatique 204.191–257.Google Scholar
Gershevitch, Ilya. 1979. The alloglottography of Old Persian. Transactions of the Philological Society 114–90.Google Scholar
Hourani, George F. 1995. Arab Seafaring, expanded ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl. 1949. Vom Ursprung und Ziel de Geschichte (The origin and goal of history). Munich: R. Piper.Google Scholar
Kahane, Henry & Kahane, Renée. 1976. Lingua Franca: The story of a term. Romance Philology 30.10.25–41.Google Scholar
King, Linda. 1994. Roots of identity: Language and literacy in Mexico. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Klauser, Theodor. 1946. Der Übergang der römischen Kirche von der griechischen zur lateinischen Liturgiesprache. Miscellanea Mercati 1.467–82.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Li, David C.S. 2006. Chinese as a lingua franca in Greater China. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 26.149–76.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1989. The origins of Fanagolo. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 4.211–38.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 1983. The Malay peoples of Malaysia and their languages. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji (ed.). 2004. Encyclopaedia of Malaysia, vol. 9: Languages and literature. Singapore: Didier Millet.Google Scholar
Ostler, Nicholas. 2010. The last lingua franca. Harmondsworth: Penguin & New York: Walker & co.Google Scholar
Sircar, D.C. 1960. Veraval inscription of Chalukya-Vaghela Arjuna, 1264 A.D. Epigraphia Indica 31.21.141–50.Google Scholar
Triana y Antorveza, Humberto. 1987. Las lenguas indígenas en la historia social del Nuevo reino de Granada. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. Ekkehard. 2000. Language and society. In African languages: An introduction, ed. by Heine, Bernd & Nurse, Derek, 298–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yule, Col. Henry & Burnell, A.C.. 1986 [1886]. Hobson Jobson, new ed., ed. by Crooke, William. New Delhi: Rupa & Co.Google Scholar
References
Bang, Jørgen C. & Døør, Jørgen. 2007. Language, ecology and society: A dialectical approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bautista, Maria L.S. & Gonzalez, Andrew. 1994. Language reform in Tagalog-based Filipino (Pilipino). In Fodor & Hagège 1994, 43–60.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo H. do. 1994. O crioulo português da Guiné-Bissau. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo H. do. 2002. A língua franca mediterrânea: histórico, textos e interpretação. Brasília: Plano Editora/Oficina Editorial IL/UnB.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo H. do. 2007. The ecology of spatial relations: The case of Kriol prepositions. In La Romania en interacción: entre historia, contacto y política, ed. by Schrader-Kniffki, Martina & García, Laura M., 479–514. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo H. do. 2009. On so-called complex prepositions in Kriol. Revue roumaine de linguistique 54.3–4.279–94.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo H. do. 2015. Linguística ecossistêmica. Ecolinguística: Revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem (ECO-REBEL) 1.1.37–62.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo H. do & do Couto, Elza K.K.N.. 2015. O discurso “fragmentado” dos meninos de rua e da linguagem rural. In Linguística ecossistêmica & análise do discurso ecológica, ed. by do Couto, Elza K.K.N. & Albuquerque, Davi B., 152–62. Brasília: Thesaurus.Google Scholar
Finke, Peter. 1996. Sprache als missing link zwischen natürlichen und kulturellen Ökosystemen. In Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik, ed. by Fill, Alwin, 27–48. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Fodor, István & Hagège, Claude (eds.). 1994. Language reform: History and future. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1972. The ecology of language. In The ecology of language, 325–39. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Geoffrey. 1994. A national language for East Timor. In Fodor & Hagège 1994, 347–66.Google Scholar
Makkai, Adam. 1993. Ecolinguistics: ¿Toward a new **paradigm** for the science of language? London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin, & Huber, Magnus (eds.). 2013. The survey of pidgin and creole languages, vol. 1: English-based and Dutch-based languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (The accompanying Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures (APiCS) (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology) is available at http://apics-online.info/contributions/22, accessed October 31, 2018.)Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1997. Kituba. In Language contact: A wider perspective, ed. by Sarah G. Thomason 173–208. Amsterdam: Jon Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2003. Contact languages in the Bantu area. In The Bantu languages, ed. by Nurse, Derek & Philippson, Gérard, 195–208. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2009. Kituba, Kileta, or Kikongo? What’s in a name? In Le nom des langues III. Le nom des langues en Afrique sub-saharienne: pratiques dénominations, catégorisations. Naming Languages in Sub-Saharan Africa: Practices, Names, Categorisations, ed. by de Féral, C., 211–22. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters/BCILL.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. (ed.). 2014. Iberian imperialism and language evolution in Latin America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newby-Rose, Heidi. 2011. Fanakalo as a trade language in Kwazulu-Natal. PhD thesis, University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
Pasch, Helma. 1997. Sango. In Contact languages: A wider perspective, ed. by Thomason, Sarah G., 209–70. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pewa, Charlotte Nonhlanhla. 2001. Fanakalo in South Africa: An overview. PhD Thesis, University of Zululand.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, Barbara. 2014. Maya and Spanishin Yucatán: An example of continuity and change. In Mufwene 2014, 205–24.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar C. 1967. Swahili language handbook. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna. 1986. Línguas brasileiras – para o conhecimento das línguas indígenas. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1962. Lingua francas of the world. In Study of the role of second languages in Asia, Africa and Latin America, ed. by Rice, F.A., 660–672. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics of MLA.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1986. Chinook Jargon and pidgin historiography. Canadian Journal of Anthropology 5.1.23–34.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1989. “Official language”: The case of Lingala. In Status and function of languages and language varieties, ed. by Ammon, Ulrich, 386–98. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar