Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:48:53.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Phonetics and Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

Edited by
Sungdai Cho  and
John Whitman
Sungdai Cho
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, State University of New York
John Whitman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 175 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Archangeli, Diana B., and Pulleyblank, Douglas George. 1994. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana B., and Pulleyblank, Douglas George. 2007. Harmony. In De Lacy, Paul V., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353–78.Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui. 1994. Vowel harmony in Korean: a grounded phonology approach. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui, and Lee, Shinsook. 1997. Korean ideophone harmony in Optimal Domains Theory. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 3: 279–94.Google Scholar
Chung, Chin-Wan. 2000. An optimality-theoretic account of vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 6(2): 431–50.Google Scholar
Činggeltei, . 1959. Mongɣol kelen-ü baɣarin ayalɣun-u abiy-a-yin jüi ba üges-ün jüi [Phonology and morphology of the Baarin dialect of Mongolian]. Öbör Mongɣol-un Yeke Surɣaɣuli-yin Erdem Sinjilegen-ü Sedgül: Gün Uqaɣan Neyigem Sinjilekü Uqaɣan [Journal of Inner Mongolia University: Philosophy and Social Sciences] 1959(2): 1–96.Google Scholar
Činggeltei, . 1963. Mongɣol kelen-ü abiyan-u sistem [The Mongolian sound system]. Öbör Mongɣol-un Yeke Surɣaɣuli-yin Erdem Sinjilegen-ü Sedgül: Gün Uqaɣan Neyigem Sinjilekü Uqaɣan [Journal of Inner Mongolia University: Philosophy and Social Sciences] 1963(2): 1–84.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N., and Sezer, Engin. 1982. Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In van der Hulst, Harry G. and Smith, Norval, eds., The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 213–55.Google Scholar
Doak, Ivy G. 1992. Another look at Coeur d’Alene harmony. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Dresher, Bezalel Elan. 2009. The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dresher, Bezalel Elan, and Zhang, Xi. 2005. Contrast and phonological activity in Manchu vowel systems. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique 50(1/2/3/4): 45–82.Google Scholar
Hall, Beatrice L., and Hall, R. M. R.. 1980. Nez Perce vowel harmony: An Africanist explanation and some theoretical questions. In Vago, Robert Michael, ed., Issues in Vowel Harmony: Proceedings of the CUNY Linguistics Conference on Vowel Harmony, 14th May 1977 (Studies in Language Companion Series (SLCS) 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Han, Eunjoo. 2009. Vowel harmony in hiatus contexts in Korean verbal morphology. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 15(2): 341–60.Google Scholar
Hattori, Shirō. 1975. Boin chōwa to chūki chōsengo no boin taikei [Vowel harmony and the Middle Korean vowel system]. Gengo no Kagaku 6: 1–22.Google Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro. 1975. A note on vowel harmony in Middle Korean. Gengo Kenkyū [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 68: 104–18.Google Scholar
Hong, Sung-Hoon. 2008. Variation and exceptions in the vowel harmony of Korean suffixes. The Journal of Sudies in Language 24(2): 405–28.Google Scholar
Huh, Woong. 1965. Kaykosinphan kwuke umwunhak [(Revised) Korean Phonology]. Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Huh, Woong. 1985. Kwuke umwunhak: wulimal soliuy onul, ecey [Korean Phonology: The Present and Past of the Speech Sounds]. Seoul: Saym Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Hyun, Woo-Jong. 1992. Ceycwu pangen holsoliuy silhem umsenghakcek yenkwu [An experimental phonetic study of the vowels of Cheju dialect]. Seoul: Konkuk University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1981. Korean vowel system in North Asian perspective. Hangeul 172: 129–46.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert. 1975. The role of phonetic detail in Coeur d’Alene phonology. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 2018. Morpho-phonological processes in Korean. In Aronoff, Mark, ed., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, Hijo. 2012. Diachrony in synchrony: Korean vowel harmony in verbal conjugation. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Kang, Sinhang. 1980. Kyeylim yusa Kolye pangen yenkwu [A study of Koryeo dialect in the Jīlín lèishì]. Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, and Ryu, Na-Young. 2015. Variation in Korean vowel harmony and the emergent locality effect. Presented at the joint meeting of the ICKL (International Circle of Korean Linguistics) and the Harvard-ISOKL (International Symposium on Korean Linguistics), University of Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Kaun, Abigail Rhoades. 1995. The typology of rounding harmony: an Optimality Theoretic approach. Los Angeles: UCLA Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Kaun, Abigail Rhoades. 2004. The Typology of Rounding Harmony. Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael J. 1979. Chukchee vowel harmony and epenthesis. In Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol, eds., The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels (Including Papers from the Conference on Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, pp. 402–12.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha-Gyun. 1984. 15 seyki kwukeuy tanmoum cheykyey [Monophthong system of the 15th century Korean]. Saykyel pakthaykwen sensayng hwakapkinyemnonchong. Busan: Ceyil Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha-Gyun. 1985. Hwunmincengum haylyeyuy moumcheykyey [Vowel system of Hunminjeongeum Haerye]. Senotang kimhyengki sensayng phalcilkinyem kwukehak nonchong. Seoul: Changhaksa.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha-Gyun. 1995. Hye okulimkwa wulimal holsoli ewullimuy eceywa onul [Tongue contraction and the past and present of vowel harmony in Korean]. Hangeul 229: 21–79.Google Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu. 1973. Adjustment rules in phonology. In Kenstowicz, Michael J. and Kisseberth, Charles W., eds., Issues in Phonological Theory. The Hague and Paris: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 130–44.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong Shil. 2007. Vowel harmony in Korean verbs. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 13(3): 433–51.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Kyoo. 2000. Quantity-sensitivity and feature-sensitivity of vowels: a constraint-based approach to Korean vowel phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Kim, Juwon. 1988. Moumcohwawa selchwuk: Hwunminjengum haylyeyuy selchwukey tayhaye [Vowel harmony and “selchwuk”: On the tongue retraction in Hunminjeongeum]. Eoneohag [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea] 9/10: 29–48.Google Scholar
Kim, Juwon. 1993. Moumcohwauy yenkwu [A Study on Vowel Harmony in Korean]. Kyeungsan [Gyeongsan]. Seoul: Yeungnam University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Juwon. 1999. Selkunhwuchwukkwa selkuncencin [RTR and ATR]. Eneuy yeksa [History of Languages: In Honor of Professor Baeg-in Seong]. Seoul: Thaehaksa, pp. 311–41.Google Scholar
Kim, Pang-Han. 1964. Kwukemoumcheykyeyuy pyentongey kwanhan kochal [On the reconstruction of the vocalic system of Middle Korean]. Tong-A Mwunhwa 2: 29–80.Google Scholar
Kim, Wan-Jin. 1963. kwuke moumcheykyeyuy sinkochal [An investigation of Korean vowel system]. Cintanhakpo 24: 63–99.Google Scholar
Kim, Wan-Jin. 1971. umwun hyensangkwa hyengthayloncek ceyyak [Phonological phenomena and morphological restrictions]. Journal of the National Academy of Sciences, Republic of Korea (Humanties and Social Sciences) 10: 116–42.Google Scholar
Kim, Wan-Jin. 1978. moumcheykyeywa moumcohwaey tayhan panseng [Reflections on the vowel system and vowel harmony of Korean]. Language Research 14(2): 127–39.Google Scholar
Kim, Wan-Jin. 1996. kotaykwukeuy moumcohwaey tayhan ilkochal [A study on vowel harmony in Old Korean]. umwunkwa mwunca [Phonemes and Graphemes]. Seoul: Shin-gu Publishing, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Kim, Young Song. 1977. Hwunmincengumuy “selchwuk” cacil [The feature “tongue contraction” in Hunminjeongeum]. Eoneohag [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea] 2: 157–66.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Jin. 1990. moeum cheykyey [Vowel system]. In Kwuke Yenkwuhoy of Seoul National University, ed., kwuke yenkwu etikkaci wassna [The current status of the study of the Korean language]. Seoul: Tong-A Chwulphansa, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Seok. 1984. Aspects of Korean morphology. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Seok. 1988. Ideophones in Korean: A nonlinear analysis. In The Linguistic Society of Korea, ed., Linguistics in the Morning Calm 2: Selected Papers from SICOL-1986. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 443–66.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1976. Semantic features in phonology: evidence from vowel harmony in Korean. Chicago Linguistic Society 12: 397–412.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2010. Cwungseykwuke moumcheykyeyui taylip wikyeywa ku pyenhwa [Contrastive hierarchy and its change in the Middle Korean vowel system]. Eoneohag [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea] 56: 87–118.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2013. The end of the Korean vowel shift controversy. Korean Linguistics 15(2): 199–221.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2018. Tongue Root Harmony and Vowel Contrast in Northeast Asian Languages (Turcologica 112). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2020. Hankwuke moumchwuiseley tayhan piphancek conghapcek kochal [A critical and comprehensive review of the Korean Vowel Shift hypothesis]. Hangeul 329: 617–54.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon, Joseph, Andrew, and Whitman, John. 2014. Comparative consequences for a tongue root harmony analysis for proto-Tungusic, proto-Mongolic, and proto-Korean. In Bisang, Walter and Robbeets, Martine Irma, eds., Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian Languages and Beyond (Studies in Language Companion Series (SLCS)). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 141–76.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1964. A Phonetic Study of West African Languages: An Auditory-Instrumental Survey (West African Language Monographs 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Darrell, and Heinz, Jeffrey. 2012. Neutral vowels in sound-symbolic vowel harmony in Korean. Phonology 29: 433–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Byung-Gun. 1985. Moum cohwauy thukseng [Some tangible properties of vowel harmony]. Inmwunnonchong [Seoul National University Journal of Humanities] 15: 3–36.Google Scholar
Lee, Duck-Young. 1994. Korean vowel harmony: ATR-harmony. Hangeul 223: 157–99.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyunbok. 1989. hankwukeuy phyocwunpalum [The standard pronunciation of Korean]. Seoul: Kyoyuk kwahaksa.Google Scholar
Lee, Jin-Seong. 1992. Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon. 1964. Mongolian loan-words in Middle Korean. Ural-altaische Jahrbücher 35: 188–97.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon. 1972a. Kwukesa kaysel [Outline of the History of the Korean Language], 2nd edition. Seoul: Tower Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon. 1972b. Kwuke umwunsa yenkwu [A Study of the Phonological History of Korean]. Seoul: Hankwuk Mwunhwa Yenkwuso.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon. 1978. 16seyki kwukeuy yenkwu [A study of 16th century Korean]. Seoul: Tower Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon, and Ramsey, S. Robert. 2011. A History of the Korean Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Pyong-Geun. 1970. Kyengkiciyekeuy moumcheykyeywa piwenswunmoumhwa [The vowel system of Kyeongki regional dialect and delabialization]. Tong-A Mwunhwa 9: 151–67.Google Scholar
Lee, Sung-Nyong. 1940. ‘·’-umko [On the sound of ‘·’ in the Korean alphabet]. Cintanhakpo 12: 1–106.Google Scholar
Lee, Sung-Nyong. 1949. Study of vowel harmony in the Korean language. Cintanhakpo 16: 7–115.Google Scholar
Lee, Yongsung. 1993. Topics in the vowel phonology of Korean. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Li, Bing. 1996. Tungusic Vowel Harmony: Description and Analysis (HIL Dissertations 18). Dordrecht: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo. 2000. How have Korean vowels changed through time? In Ree, Joe J., ed., Korean Linguistics [Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics] 10: 1–60.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1983. Phonological Features and Morphological Structure. The Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew. 1971. Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages (History and Structure of Languages). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Yang-Soo. 1974. A phonological history of Korean. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Nam, Phunghyun. 1993. cwungseykwukeuy uysenguythaye [Onomatopoeic and mimetic words in Middle Korean]. Saykwukesaynghwal 3(2); 93–115.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in Vowel Harmony (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 55). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Novikova, Klavdija A. 1960. Ocherki dialektov Evenskogo jazyka: ol’skij govor, volume 1. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Oh, Kwang-Keun. 1993. 15seki cengum mwunhene nathananun moum iphoki yenkwu [A study of misspellings in the 15th century “cengum” texts]. Sengkyunemwunyenkwu 29: 185–201.Google Scholar
Oh, Sang-Suk. 1998. The Korean Vowel Shift revisited. Language Research 34(2): 445–63.Google Scholar
Park, Jong-Hee. 1983. Kwuke umwunlon yenkwu [A Study on Korean Phonology]. Iri: Wonkwang University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Jong-Hee. 1994. Cwunglipmoum /i/-uy poncilkwa moumcohwa [The nature of the neutral vowel /i/ and vowel harmony]. In nonchongkanhayngwiwenhoy (ed.), Wulimal yenkwuuy saymthe. Daejeon: Mwunkyeng Press, pp. 134–53.Google Scholar
Park, Jong-Hee. 2002. Cwungsengmoum /i/-uy thwumyengsengkwa pwulthwumyengseng [The transparency and opacity of the neutral vowel /i/ in Middle Korean]. Hangeul 257: 71–101.Google Scholar
Park, Jong-Hee, and Kwon, Pyong-Ro. 2009. Moumcheykyeyuy pyenchenkwa cacilkyelhap coken [The change of vowel system and featural combination conditions in Middle Korean]. Kwukemwunhak 47: 37–61.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas N. 1960. Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen. Teil I. Vergleichende Lautlehre [Comparative Grammar of the Altaic languages, Part 1: Comparative Phonology]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustaf John. 1952. Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft I-III. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine Irma. 2005. Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon, and Walker, Rachel. 2011. Harmony systems. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason, and Yu, Alan C. L., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 240–90.Google Scholar
Sasa, Tomomasa. 2009. Treatment of vowel harmony in optimality theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Hyang-Sook. 1987. Underspecification in Korean phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei Anatolyevich. 1991. Altajskaja problema i proisxoždenie japonskogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stewart, John M. 1967. Tongue root position in Akan vowel harmony. Phonetica 16: 185–204.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1985. Vowel harmony shift in Mongolian. Lingua 67(4): 283–327. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(85)90002-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Tsendina, Anna, Karlsson, Anastasia Mukhanova, and Vivan, Franzén. 2005. The Phonology of Mongolian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry. 2018. Asymmetries in Vowel Harmony: A Representational Account. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, and Jeroen, van de Weijer. 1995. Vowel harmony. In Goldsmith, John A., ed., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 1st edition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 495–534.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 2009. [atr] and [back] harmony in the Altaic languages. In Tatevosov, Sergei, ed., Investigations into Formal Altaic Linguistics: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 3). Moscow: MAKS Press, pp. 50–67.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 2000. On the Great Vowel Shift in Middle Korean and position of stress in Proto-Korean. In Ree, Joe J., ed., Korean Linguistics [Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics] 10: 61–78.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel. 2012. Vowel harmony in Optimality Theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(9): 575–92.Google Scholar
Whitman, John. 2015. Old Korean. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon, eds., The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 419–38.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xi. 1996. Vowel systems of the Manchu-Tungus languages of China. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar

References

Abramson, Arthur S., and Whalen, Douglas H.. 2017. Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics 63: 75–86.Google Scholar
Ahn, Hyunkee. 1999. Post-release phonatory processes in English and Korean: acoustic correlates and implications for Korean phonology. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Ahn, Sang-cheol, and Iverson, Gregory K.. 2004. Dimensions in Korean laryngeal phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 345–79.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter, and Idsardi, William J.. 2001. Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In Hall, T. A., ed., Distinctive Feature Theory. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 41–70.Google Scholar
Bang, Hye-Young, Sonderegger, Morgan, Kang, Yoonjung, Clayards, Meghan, and Yoon, Tae-Jin. 2018. The emergence, progress, and impact of sound change in progress in Seoul Korean: Implications for mechanisms of tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics 66: 120–44.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, and Walker, Steven C.. 2015. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html [last accessed August 20, 2020].Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Li, Fangfang, Kong, Eun Jong, and Edwards, Jan. 2014. Aligning the timelines of phonological acquisition and change. Laboratory Phonology 5: 151–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2014. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ [last accessed August 20, 2020].Google Scholar
Byun, Hi Gyung. 2016. F0 as a primary cue for signaling word-initial stops of Seoul Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 8: 25–36.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, Jun, Sun-Ah, and Ladefoged, Peter. 2002. Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30: 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Taehong, and Keating, Patricia A.. 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29: 155–90.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu. 2011. Laryngeal contrast in Korean. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. V., and Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2662–84.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu, and Inkelas, Sharon. 1994. Post-obstruent tensification in Korean and geminate inalterability. In Kim-Renaud, Y-K., ed.,Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
Choi, Hansook. 2002. Acoustic cues for the Korean stop contrast: dialectal variation. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 28: 1–12.Google Scholar
Chung, Eun-Hye. 2011. An experimental study of vowels and consonants of Standard Yukjin dialect [Hyentay Yukcin Pangen Camoumey Kwanhan Silhemumsenghakcek Yen-gu]. MA Dissertation, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah N. 1987. An aerodynamic study of Korean stop consonants: Measurements and modeling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81: 138–47.Google Scholar
De Rosario-Martinez, Helios. 2015. phia package, version 0.2–1. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/phia/ [last accessed August 20, 2020].Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1971. A note on laryngeal features, QPR Research Laboratory of Electronics. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT 101: 198–213.Google Scholar
Han, Jeong-Im. 1996. The phonetics and phonology of “tense” and “plain” consonants in Korean. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Han, Kyungim. 2011. Acoustic cues for the Korean stop consonants produced by Jeju speakers. The Journal of Linguistic Science 57: 247–60.Google Scholar
Han, Kyungim. 2014. VOT in Korean stops: A comparison between Jeju and Daegu Dialects [Hankwuke Phyeyswayum VOT: Ceycwupangenkwa Taykwupangen Pikyo]. Cogito 75: 157–76.Google Scholar
Han, M-S., and Weitzman, R. S.. 1970. Acoustic features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/, and /pʰ, tʰ, kʰ/. Phonetica 22: 112–28.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. 1973. Some observations on the tense-lax distinction in initial stops in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 1(3): 263–72.Google Scholar
Hirose, H., Lee, C. Y., and Ushijima, T.. 1974. Laryngeal control in Korean stop production. Journal of Phonetics 2; 145–52.Google Scholar
Holliday, Jeffrey J., and Kong, Eun Jong. 2011. Dialectal variation in the acoustic correlates of Korean stops. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 17: 878–81.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J., and Ewan, William G.. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki, and Kenstowicz, Michael. 2009. Mandarin loanwords in Yanbian Korean I: Laryngeal features. Phonological Studies 12: 61–72.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. 1983. On glottal width features. Lingua 60: 331–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, Hye Jin, and Shin, Ji-Young. 2010. Dialectual differences in the perception of phonation types in word-initial stops: Based on comparison between Seoul and Daegu Dialect [Etwu Phyeyswayumuy Palseng Yuhyeng Cikakeyse Nathananun Pangen Kan Chai – Sewul Pangenkwa Tay-gu Pangenuy Pikyolul Pathangu-ro]. Korean Linguistics 49: 369–88.Google Scholar
Jin, Wenhua. 2008. Sounds of Chinese Korean: a Variationist approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Jin, Wenhua, and Silva, David J.. 2017. Parallel Voice Onset Time shift in Chinese Korean. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3: 41–66.Google Scholar
Jo, Min-Ha. 2004. An acoustic-phonetic study of plosives in Seoul and Taegu dialects [Sewulkwa Tay-gu Pangen Phayelumuy Umhyangumsenghakcek Yen-gu]. MA Dissertation, Korea University.Google Scholar
Jo, Min-Ha, and Shin, Ji-Young. 2003. VOT comparison between Seoul and Kyungsang dialects [Kyengsang Pangenkwa Sewul Pangenuy VOT Cisoksikaney Tayhan Pikyo Yen-gu]. Malsori 46: 1–11.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1995. Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean. In Connell, B. and Arvaniti, A., eds., Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1996. Influence of microprosody on macroprosody: a case of phrase initial strengthening. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 92: 359–84.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah, Beckman, Mary, Niimi, Seiji, and Tiede, Mark. 1997. Electromyographic evidence for a gestural-overlap analysis of vowel devoicing in Korean. The Journal of Speech Sciences 1: 153–200.Google Scholar
Kagaya, Ryohei. 1974. A fiberscopic and acoustic study of the Korean stops, affricates and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 2: 161–80.Google Scholar
Kang, Kyoung-Ho, and Guion, Susan G.. 2006. Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119: 1672–83.Google Scholar
Kang, Kyoung-Ho, and Guion, Susan G.. 2008. Clear speech production of Korean stops: Changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124: 3909–17.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. 2014. Voice Onset Time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics 45: 76–90.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, and Han, Sung-Woo. 2012. Dialectal variation in Korean stops. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Meeting of the Society of Korean Linguistics and the Society of Korean Dialectology.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, and Han, Sungwoo. 2013. Tonogenesis in early Contemporary Seoul Korean: A longitudinal case study. Lingua 134: 62–74.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, Han, Sungwoo, Kochetov, Alexei, and Kong, Eun Jong. 2012. Cross-language perception under sound change in progress: loanword connection. Paper presented at The 86th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, and Nagy, Naomi. 2016. VOT merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28: 249–72.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, and Yun, Suyeon. 2018. Acquisition of second dialect features by North Koreans in Seoul. Paper presented at LabPhon16. University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael, and Park, Chiyoun. 2006. Laryngeal features and tone in Kyungsang Korean: A phonetics study. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 12: 247–64.Google Scholar
Keshet, Joseph, Sonderegger, Morgan, and Knowles, Thea. 2014. AutoVOT: A tool for automatic measurement of voice onset time using discriminative structured prediction, version 0.91. Available at: https://github.com/mlml/autovot/ [last accessed August 20, 2020].Google Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu. 1965. On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops). Word 21; 339–59.Google Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu. 1970. A theory of aspiration. Phonetica 21: 107–16.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyunsoon, Honda, Kiyoshi, and Maeda, Shinji. 2005. Stroboscopic-cine MRI study of the phasing between the tongue and the larynx in the Korean three-way phonation contrast. Journal of Phonetics 33: 1–26.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyunsoon, Maeda, Shinji, and Honda, Kiyoshi. 2010. Invariant articulatory bases of the features [tense] and [spread glottis] in Korean plosives: New stroboscopic cine-MRI data. Journal of Phonetics 38: 90–108.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji-Eun. 2015. Reinterpretation of stop production in Korean elderly speakers. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 7: 139–45.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-Ran Cho. 1994. Acoustic characteristics of Korean stops and perception of English stop consonants. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-Ryoung. 2000. Segmental and tonal interactions in English and Korean: A phonetic and phonological study. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-Ryoung, and Duanmu, San. 2004. “Tense” and “lax” stops in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 59–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mi-Ryoung, Beddor, Patrice Speeter, and Horrocks, Julie. 2002. The contribution of consonantal and vocalic information to the perception of Korean initial stops. Journal of Phonetics 30: 77–100.Google Scholar
Kim, Won-Bo, and Byun, Gil-Ja. 2014. Variations in VOT, f0 and burst energy of word-initial voiceless stops produced by Jeju speakers in their 20’s, 50’s and 70’s respectively [Ceycwupangen Hwacauy Seytaypyel(20Tay/50Tay/70Tay) Etwu Phayelumuy VOT, F0 Mit Phayelkang-do? (burst energy) Pyeniyangsang]. Tamla Culture 44: 123–44.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1974. Korean Consonantal Phonology. Seoul: Pagoda Press.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1977. Syllable-boundary phenomena in Korean. Korean Studies 1: 243–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1997. Review of “Laryngeal Features and Laryngeal Neutralization” by Linda Lombardi. Language 73: 411–16.Google Scholar
Kingston, John. 2011. Tonogenesis. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E.V., and Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2305–33.Google Scholar
Kingston, John, and Diehl, Randy L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70: 419–54.Google Scholar
Kirby, James. 2013. The role of probabilistic enhancement in phonologization. In Yu, A. C. L., ed., Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 228–46.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei, and Kang, Yoonjung. 2017. Supralaryngeal implementation of length and laryngeal contrasts in Japanese and Korean. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 62: 18–55.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation Change 2: 205–54.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyunjung, and Jongman, Allard. 2012. Effects of tone on the three-way laryngeal distinction in Korean: An acoustic and aerodynamic comparison of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42: 145–69.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyunjung, and Jongman, Allard. 2013. Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics 41: 117–32.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyunjung, and Jongman, Allard. 2019. Effects of sound change on the weighting of acoustic cues to the three-way laryngeal stop contrast in Korean: Diachronic and dialectal comparisons. Language and Speech 62: 509–30.Google Scholar
Lee, Jeonghyun, and Oh, Mira. 2010. Korean stops production in the Cheonnam and the Seoul Dialects. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 18: 93–104.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, Guion, Susan, Hura, Susan, Moon, Seung-Jae, and Willerman, Raquel. 1995. Is sound change adaptive? Rivista di Linguistica 7: 5–36.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh, and Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384–422.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 1994. Laryngeal Features and Laryngeal Neutralization. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Obata, J., and Toyoshima, T.. 1932. Acoustic features of Korean vowels and consonants. Nippon Sugaku Butsuri Gakkaishi 6: 379–403.Google Scholar
Oh, Eunjin. 2011. Effects of speaker gender on voice onset time in Korean stops. Journal of Phonetics 39: 59–67.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2007. Markedness in phonology. In de Lacy, P., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–97.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2013. Longitudinal studies. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R., and Lucas, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2018. Language change across the lifespan. Annual Review of Linguistics 4: 297–316.Google Scholar
Shin, Jiyoung. 1997. Consonantal production and coarticulation in Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Shin, Jiyoung, Kiaer, Jieun, and Cha, Jaeeun. 2012. The Sounds of Korean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Woobong. 2015. An acoustic study of the vowels and word-initial obstruents in the Jeju dialect of Korean [Ceycwu Pangen Tanmoumkwa Etwu Cangayumuy Umhyang Umsenghakcek Yen-gu]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Korea University.Google Scholar
Silva, David J. 1992. The phonetics and phonology of stop lenition in Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Silva, David J. 2002. Consonant aspiration in Korean: A retrospective. Inn Lee, S.O., Iverson, G., Ahn, S-C., and Cho, Y-M.Y., eds., Pathways into Korean Language and Culture: Essays in Honor of Young-Key Kim-Renaud. Seoul: Pagijong Press, pp. 387–409.Google Scholar
Silva, David J. 2006. Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology 23: 287–308.Google Scholar
Wright, Jonathan D. 2007. Laryngeal contrast in Seoul Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

References

Arvaniti, A., and Garding, G.. 2007. Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. In Hualde, J. and Cole, J., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 547–76.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D. R., and Mennen, I.. 2000. What is a starred tone? Evidence from Greek. In Broe, M. and Pierrehumbert, J., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–31.Google Scholar
Atterer, M., and Ladd, D. R.. 2004. On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of F0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics 32: 177–97.Google Scholar
Bang, H., Sonderegger, M., Kang, Y., Clayards, M., and Yoon, T.. 2018. The emergence, progress, and impact of sound change in progress in Seoul Korean: Implications for mechanisms of tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics 66: 120–44.Google Scholar
Baumann, S., and Winter, B.. 2018. What makes a word prominent? Predicting untrained German listeners’ perceptual judgments. Journal of Phonetics 70: 20–38.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. 1996. The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes 11: 17–67.Google Scholar
Beddor, P. S. 2009. A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language 85(4): 785–821.Google Scholar
Berkovits, R. 1993. Utterance-final lengthening and the duration of final-stop closures. Journal of Phonetics 21: 479–89.Google Scholar
Berkovits, R. 1994. Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress. Language and Speech 37: 237–50.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Gleerup, Lund: Travaux de L’institut de Linguistique de Lund XII.Google Scholar
Byrd, D. 2000. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57: 3–16.Google Scholar
Byrd, D. 2006. Relating prosody and dynamic events: Commentary on the papers by Cho, Navas, and Smiljanić. In Goldstein, L., Whalen, D., and Best, C., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 549–61.Google Scholar
Byrd, D., and Saltzman, E.. 1998. Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 26: 173–99.Google Scholar
Byrd, D., and Saltzman, E.. 2003. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 31: 149–80.Google Scholar
Byrd, D., Krivokapić, J., and Lee, S.. 2006. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120: 1589–99.Google Scholar
Byrd, D., Kaun, A., Narayanan, S., and Saltzman, E.. 2000. Phrasal signatures in articulation. In Broe, M. and Pierrehumbert, J., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–88.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., and Gussenhoven, C.. 2008. Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36(4): 724–46.Google Scholar
Cho, T. 2004. Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 32: 141–76.Google Scholar
Cho, T. 2005. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a, i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(6): 3867–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, T. 2006. Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English. In Goldstein, L. M., Whalen, D. H., and Best, C. T., eds., Laboratory Phonology 8: Varieties of Phonological Competence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 519–48.Google Scholar
Cho, T. 2008. Prosodic strengthening in transboundary V-to-V lingual movement in American English. Phonetica 65: 45–61.Google Scholar
Cho, T. 2011. Laboratory phonology. In Kula, N. C., Botma, B., and Nasukawa, K., eds., The Continuum Companion to Phonology. London/New York: Continuum, pp. 343–68.Google Scholar
Cho, T. 2015. Language effects on timing at the segmental and suprasegmental levels. In Redford, M., ed., The Handbook of Speech Production. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 505–29.Google Scholar
Cho, T. 2016. Prosodic boundary strengthening in the phonetics-prosody interface. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(3): 120–41.Google Scholar
Cho, T., and Jun, S.. 2000. Domain-initial strengthening as featural enhancement: Aerodynamic evidence from Korean. Chicago Linguistics Society 36: 31–44.Google Scholar
Cho, T., and Keating, P.. 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies of domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29: 155–90.Google Scholar
Cho, T., and Keating, P.. 2009. Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics 37: 466–85.Google Scholar
Cho, T., and Ladefoged, L.. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27: 207–29.Google Scholar
Cho, T., and McQueen, J.. 2005. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 33: 121–57.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Jun, S-A., and Ladefoged, P.. 2002. Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30: 193–228.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Kim, D., and Kim, S.. 2017. Prosodically conditioned fine-tuning of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in English. Journal of Phonetics 64: 71–89.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Kim, D., and Kim, S.. 2019. Prosodic strengthening in reference to the lexical pitch accent system in South Kyungsang Korean. The Linguistic Review 36(1): 85–116.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Kim, J., and Kim, S.. 2013. Preboundary lengthening and preaccentual shortening across syllables in a trisyllabic word in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(5): EL384–EL390.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Lee, Y., and Kim, S.. 2011. Communicatively driven versus prosodically driven hyper-articulation in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 39(3): 344–61.Google Scholar
Cho, T., McQueen, J., and Cox, E.. 2007. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 35: 210–43.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Son, M., and Kim, S.. 2016. Articulatory reflexes of the three-way contrast in labial stops and kinematic evidence for domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 46; 129–55.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Whalen, D. H., and Docherty, G.. 2019. Voice onset time and beyond: Exploring laryngeal contrast in 19 languages. Journal of Phonetics 72: 52–65.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Kim, S., and Cho, T.. 2020. An apparent-time study of an ongoing sound change in Seoul Korean: A prosodic account. PloS ONE 15(10): e0240682: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240682.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Lee, J., Kim, S., and Cho, T.. 2018. Prosodically-conditioned phonetic cues in production of Korean aspirated vs. lenis stops. In Cho, T., Kim, S., Choi, J., Kim, J., Kim, S., and Kim, K., eds., HisPhonCog: Hanyang International Symposium on Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language 1: 121.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M.. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. (Reprinted, 1991, Boston: The MIT Press.)Google Scholar
Coetzee, A. W., Beddor, P., Shedden, K., Styler, W., and Wissing, D.. 2018. Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics 66: 185–216.Google Scholar
De Jong, J. J. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 491–504.Google Scholar
De Jong, K. J. 2004. Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 32: 493–516.Google Scholar
De Jong, K. J., and Zawaydeh, B. A.. 2002. Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: Patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 30: 53–75.Google Scholar
Flemming, E. 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. 2010. The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J., and Gibbon, F. E., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (2nd edition). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 523–602.Google Scholar
Fougeron, C. 1999. Prosodically conditioned articulatory variations: A review. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 97: 1–74.Google Scholar
Fougeron, C. 2001. Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics 29: 109–35.Google Scholar
Fougeron, C., and Keating, P. A.. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106: 3728–40.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A. 1988. Periodic dwindling of acoustic and articulatory variables in speech production. Paw Review 3: 10–13.Google Scholar
Gaskell, M. G., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D.. 1996. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22: 144–58.Google Scholar
Gaskell, M. G., and Snoeren, N. D.. 2008. The impact of strong assimilation on the perception of connected speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34(6): 1632–47.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. 2008. Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25: 83–137.Google Scholar
Jang, J., and Katsika, A.. 2020. The amount of scope of phrase-final lengthening in Seoul Korean. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 270–4. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Jang, J., Kim, S., and Cho, T.. 2018. Focus and boundary effects on coarticulatory vowel nasalization in Korean with implications for cross-linguistic similarities and differences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144: EL33–9.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 1995a. Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean. In Connell, B. and Arvaniti, A., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 4: Phonology and Phonetic Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 1995b. An acoustic study of Korean stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98: 2893.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 1996. Influence of microprosody on macroprosody: A case of phrase initial strengthening. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 92: 97–116.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 1998. The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 15(2): 189–226.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 2000. K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) Labelling Conventions (Version 3.1). www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/ktobi/K-tobi.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jun, S-A. 2014. Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In Jun, S-A., ed., Prosodic Typology 2: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 520–39.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A., Beckman, M., and Lee, H.. 1998. Fiberscopic evidence for the influence on vowel devoicing of the glottal configurations for Korean obstruents. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 96: 43–68.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A., and Fougeron, C.. 2002. Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus 14: 147–72Google Scholar
Kang, Y. 2014. Voice Onset Time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics 45: 76–90.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A. 1984. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60: 286–319.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A. 1985. Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. In Fromkin, V. A., ed., Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 115–32.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A. 1990. The window model of coarticulation: Articulatory evidence. In Kingston, J. and Beckman, M., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 451–70.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A. 2006. Phonetic encoding of prosodic structure. In Harrington, J. and Tabain, M., eds., Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes, and Techniques. New York and Hove: Psychology Press, pp.167–86.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., and Hsu, C.. 2003. Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. In Local, J., Ogden, R., and Temple, R., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6: Phonetic Interpretations. Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–63.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.. 2002. A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 101: 112–56.Google Scholar
Kim, J., and Jun, S.-A.. 2009. Prosodic structure and focus prosody of South Kyungsang Korean. Language Research 45(1): 43–66.Google Scholar
Kim, S. 2004. The role of prosodic phrasing in Korean word segmentation. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Kim, S-J. 2000. Accentual effects on segmental phonological rules in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Broersma, M., and Cho, T.. 2012. The use of prosodic cues in processing an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(3): 415–44.Google Scholar
Kim, S., and Cho, T.. 2009. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: Evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(5): 3373–86.Google Scholar
Kim, S., and Cho, T.. 2013. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(1): EL19–EL25.Google Scholar
Kim, S., and Cho, T.. 2014. Articulatory modification of /m/ in the coda and the onset as a function of prosodic boundary strength and focus in Korean. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences 6(4): 3–15.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Jang, J., and Cho, T.. 2017. Articulatory characteristics of preboundary lengthening in interaction with prominence on tri-syllabic words in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(4): EL362–8.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Kim, J., and Cho, T.. 2018. Prosodic-structural modulation of stop voicing contrast along the VOT continuum in trochaic and iambic words in American English. Journal of Phonetics 71: 65–80.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Mittererer, H., and Cho, T.. 2018. A time course of prosodic modulation in phonological inferencing: The case of Korean post-obstruent tensing. PLOS ONE 13(8): e0202912, 1–28.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. 2011. An acoustic, aerodynamic and perceptual investigation of word-initial denasalization in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Kingston, J. 2011. Tonogenesis. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E., and Rice, K., eds., Blackwell Companion to Phonology 5. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2304–34.Google Scholar
Kingston, J., and Diehl, R. L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70: 419–54.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. 2018. Onset pitch perturbations and the cross-linguistic implementation of voicing: Evidence from tonal and non-tonal languages. Journal of Phonetics 71: 326–54.Google Scholar
Krakow, R. A., Bell-Berti, F., and Wang, Q. E.. 1995. Supralaryngeal declination: Evidence from the velum. In Bell-Berti, F. and Raphael, J. J., eds., Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues: For Katherine Safford Harris. Melville, Long Island, New York: AIP Publishing, pp. 333–54.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, J. 2012. Prosodic planning in speech production. In Fuchs, Susanne, Weihrich, Melanie, Pape, Daniel, and Perrier, Pascal, eds., Speech Planning and Dynamics. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, pp. 157–90.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. 2018. Pitch accent. In Hasegawa, Y., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154–80.Google Scholar
Kučerová, I., and Neeleman, A.. 2012. Contrasts and Positions in Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kühnert, B., and Nolan, F.. 1999. The origin of coarticulation. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Hewlett, N., eds., Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques in Speech Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. 2004. Segmental anchoring of pitch movements: Autosegmental phonology or speech production? In Quené, H. and van Heuven, V., eds., On Speech and Language: Studies for Sieb G. Nooteboom. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT), pp. 123–32.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. 2006. Segmental anchoring of pitch movements: Autosegmental association or gestural coordination? Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics] 18: 19–38.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. 2008. Intonational Phonology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R., Schepman, A., White, L., Quarmby, L. M., and Stackhouse, R.. 2009. Structural and dialectal effects of pitch peak alignment in two varities of British English. Journal of Phonetics 37: 145–61.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R., and Schmid, S.. 2018. Obstruent voicing effects on F0, but without voicing: Phonetic correlates of Swiss German lenis, fortis, and aspirated stops. Journal of Phonetics 71: 229–48.Google Scholar
Lim, B-J., and de Jong, K.. 1999. Tonal alignment in standard Korean: The case of younger generation. Paper presented at the Western Conference on Linguistics, University of Texas, El Paso, TX.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. 1963. Spectrographic study of the vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35: 1773–81.Google Scholar
Lombardi, L. 1991. Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mitterer, H, Cho, T., and Kim, S.. 2016. How does prosody influence speech categorization? Journal of Phonetics 54: 68–79.Google Scholar
Moon, S. J., and Lindblom, B.. 1994. Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96: 40–55.Google Scholar
Mücke, D., and Grice, M.. 2014. The effect of focus marking on supralaryngeal articulation – Is it mediated by accentuation? Journal of Phonetics 44: 47–61.Google Scholar
Nakai, S., Kunnari, S., Turk, A., Suomi, K., and Ylitalo, R.. 2008. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 37: 39–45.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., and Vogel, I.. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Oh, E. 2011. Effects of speaker gender on voice onset time in Korean stops. Journal of Phonetics 39: 59–67.Google Scholar
Park, K. C. 2004. The phrase-initial high in Korean. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 10: 203–23.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., and Beckman, M.. 1988. Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., and Talkin, D.. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty, G. and Ladd, D. R., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 2: Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–117.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., and Torreira, F.. 2007. The segmental anchoring hypothesis revisited. Syllable structure and speech rate effects on peak timing in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 35: 473–500.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. 2001. The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 493–515.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., and Aslin, R. N.. 1996. Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 606–21.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In Goldsmith, J. A., ed., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 550–69.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., and Turk, A. E.. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25(2): 193–247.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. A. 2008. The scope and effects of preboundary prosodic lengthening in Japanese. USC Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 1–14.Google Scholar
Silva, D. J. 2006. Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology 23(2): 287–308.Google Scholar
Tabain, M. 2003. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: Articulatory results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113: 2834–49.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Cho, T., Kim, S., and Shin, S.. 2018. Gradient effects of tonal scaling in the segmentation of Korean speech: An artificial-language segmentation study. In Proceedings of the 9th Internatinal Conference on Speech Prosody 2018 (pp. 65–9). Poznań, Poland.Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35: 445–72.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. 1991. Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening. In Sundberg, J., Nord, L., and Carlson, R., eds., French in Music, Language, Speech and Brain 59: 108–20.Google Scholar
Vayra, M., and Fowler, C.. 1992. Declination of supralaryngeal gestures in spoken Italian. Phonetica 49: 48–60.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K. 2008. Phonetic implementation of Korean denasalization and its variation related to prosody. IULC Working Papers 8(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

References

Bennett, Ryan, and Elfner, Emily. 2019. The syntax-prosody interface. Annual Reviews of Linguistics 5: 20.1–20.21.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu. 1987. Phrasal phonology of Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 2: 328–40.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, and Keating, Patricia A.. 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29: 155–90.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-Mee Yu. 1990. Syntax and phrasing in Korean. In Inkelas, Sharon and Zed, Draga, eds., The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Illinois: University of Chicago Press, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2012. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. In Borowsky, Toni, Kawahara, Shigeto, Shinya, Takahito, and Sugahara, Mariko, eds., Prosody Matters: Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. London: Equinox, pp. 280–303.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1996. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1998. The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 15(2): 189–226.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Intonational phonology of Seoul Korean revisited. Department of Linguistics, UCLA, 104, 14–25.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1985. Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J., and Yu, A. C. L., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 435–84.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Lee, Seunghun J.. 2015. Constituency in sentence phonology: An introduction. Phonology 32: 1–18.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Shen, Tong. 1990. Prosodic domains in Shanghai Chinese. In Inkelas, Sharon and Zed, Draga, eds., The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Illinois: University of Chicago Press, pp. 313–38.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Takeishi, Koichi. 1988. Constraints on minor phrase formation in Japanese. In MacLeod, Lynn, Laron, Gary, and Brentari, Diane, eds., Papers from the 24th Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 316–36.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. 1988. Determining the domain for intervocalic stop voicing in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 3: 177–88.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. 1990. A prosody-based investigation into the phonetics of Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 4: 181–95.Google Scholar

References

Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S-A., and Oh, J. S.. 2002. Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science 13(3): 238–43.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore: York Press, pp. 171–204.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5(9/10): 341–5.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2019. Language change and linguistic inquiry in a world of multicompetence: Sustained phonetic drift and its implications for behavioral linguistic research. Journal of Phonetics 74: 96–113.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Yao, Y., Haynes, E. F., and Rhodes, R.. 2011. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129(6): 3964–80.Google Scholar
Cheon, S., and Lee, T.. 2013. Perception of Korean stops by heritage and non-heritage learners: Pedagogical implications for beginning learners. The Korean Language in America 18: 23–39.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15: 47–65.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1995. Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–73.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., and Liu, S.. 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41(1): 78–104.Google Scholar
Godson, L. 2004. Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal 2(1): 44–69.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 1994. The status of lenis stop voicing rule in Korean. In Kim-Renaud, Y-K, ed., Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 101–14.Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. 2006. Phonological development of Korean: A case study. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 11: 17–33.Google Scholar
Kim, M-R. 1994. Acoustic characteristics of Korean stops and perception of English stop consonants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Kim, M-R., and Lotto, A. J.. 2002. An investigation of acoustic characteristics of Korean stops produced by non-heritage learners. In Ree, J. J., ed., The Korean Language in America 7: 177–88.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K., and Brown, J. D.. 2008. Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean Heritage Language Students: Curriculum Needs, Materials, and Assessment (ESL and Applied Linguistics Professional series). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Laleko, O., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Marking topic or marking case: A comparative investigation of heritage Japanese and heritage Korean. Heritage Language Journal 10(2): 40–64.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., and Abrahamson, A. S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384–422.Google Scholar
Nozawa, T., and Cheon, S.. 2014. The identification of stops in a coda position by native speakers of American English, Korean and Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 18: 13–27.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S., Jun, S-A, Knightly, L. M., and Au, T. K.. 2003. Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition 86(3): B53–64.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. M. 2007. Cross-language consonant identification: English and Korean. In Bohn, O. S. and Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185–200.Google Scholar
UCLA Steering Committee. 2000. Heritage language research priorities conference report. Bilingual Research Journal 24(4): 465–74.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 1995. The teaching of minority languages as academic aubjects: Pedagogical and theoretical challenges. The Modern Language Journal 79: 299–328.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Phonetics and Phonology
  • Edited by Sungdai Cho, Binghamton University, State University of New York, John Whitman, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
  • Online publication: 30 September 2022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Phonetics and Phonology
  • Edited by Sungdai Cho, Binghamton University, State University of New York, John Whitman, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
  • Online publication: 30 September 2022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Phonetics and Phonology
  • Edited by Sungdai Cho, Binghamton University, State University of New York, John Whitman, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
  • Online publication: 30 September 2022
Available formats
×