Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T07:13:35.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Emotional Responses to Sarcasm

from Part V - Irony, Affect, and Related Figures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2023

By
Ruth Filik
Edited by
Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr  and
Herbert L. Colston
Herbert L. Colston
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access

Summary

Ironic language often conveys and elicits intense emotions. This chapter describes much of the relevant experimental research on the ways people emotionally react to sarcastic messages (e.g., “You’re so strong” when the person is actually rather weak). She considers some of the communicative reasons why people employ sarcasm in their speech, including possible affective messages they may wish to express. Experimental studies have employed eye tracking and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) measures to assess examine people’s anticipated emotional responses to story characters who were presented with either ironic (e.g., “You’re so strong”) or literal (e.g., “You’re so weak”) criticisms. The results suggest that readers initially anticipated a hurt response to ironic criticism, but eventually found it easier to integrate a hurt response following literal criticism (i.e., a “two-stage model” of emotional responses). But there are important individual differences in the ways people respond to sarcasm, not surprisingly. For example, autistic individuals do not easily distinguish between ironic and literal criticisms. Older adults also exhibit reduced abilities to understand and emotionally respond to sarcastic utterances. There are also significant variations in the ways people from different cultures use, interpret, and emotionally respond to sarcasm.

Keywords

affectcultural differencesemotional reactionsimplied criticismindividual differencesliteral languagesarcastic messagestwo-stage modelverbal irony
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought , pp. 255 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Au-Yeung, S. K., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in autism spectrum disorder: An eye-movement study. Autism Research, 8, 749–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnden, J. A. (2020). Uniting irony, metaphor and hyperbole in a pretence-based, affect-centred framework. In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. L. (Eds.), The diversity of irony (pp. 15–65). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzy, M., Filik, R., Williams, D., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Emotional processing of ironic versus literal criticism in autistic and nonautistic adults: Evidence from eye-tracking. Autism Research, 13, 563–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasko, D. G., & Kazmerski, V. A. (2006). ERP Correlates of individual differences in the comprehension of nonliteral language. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasko, D. G., Kazmerski, V. A., & Dawood, S. S. (2021). Saying that you don’t mean: A cross-cultural study of perceptions of sarcasm. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 114–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2011). When sarcasm stings. Discourse Processes, 48, 215–236.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffarra, S., Haeri, A. M., Michel, E., & Martin, C. D. (2019). When is irony influenced by communicative constraints? ERP evidence supporting interactive models. European Journal of Neuroscience, 50, 3566–3577.Google Scholar
Caillies, S., Gobin, P., Obert, A., Terrion, S., Coutté, A., Iakimova, G., & Besche-Richard, C. (2019). Asymmetry of affect in verbal irony understanding: What about the N400 and P600 components? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 268–277.Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colston, H. L. (2007). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 319–338). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). “You’ll never believe this”: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H., & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1557–1583.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multi-dimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
Del Goleto, S., Kostova, M., & Blanchet, A. (2016). Impaired context processing during irony comprehension in schizotypy: An ERPs study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 105, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–367.Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dress, M. L., Kreuz, R. J., Link, K. E., & Caucci, G. M. (2008). Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Brightman, E., Gathercole, C., & Leuthold, H. (2017). The emotional impact of verbal irony: Eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman, C., & Giora, R. (2018). The role of defaultness and personality factors in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor and Symbol, 33, 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Hunter, C. M., & Leuthold, H. (2015). When language gets emotional: Irony and the embodiment of affect in discourse. Acta Psychologica, 156, 114–125.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 811–828.Google Scholar
Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116, 421–436.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Țurcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A. (2016). Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2130–2146.Google Scholar
Garcia, C., Țurcan, A., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2022). Emoji as a tool to aid the comprehension of written sarcasm: Evidence from younger and older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106971.Google Scholar
Glenwright, M., & Agbayewa, A. S. (2012). Older children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders can comprehend verbal irony in computer-mediated communication. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 628–638.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447–463.Google Scholar
Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 36, 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Ruffman, T., & Bailey, P. E. (2013). A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychology and Aging, 28, 826–839.Google Scholar
Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2020). The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1729–1744.Google Scholar
Ivanko, S. L., Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 244–271.Google Scholar
Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humour perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 123–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, J. (1996). The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 613–634.Google Scholar
Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51, 287–311.Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2018). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research: LTR, 22, 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowatch, K., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 50, 301–315.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., & Church, M. B. (1991). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (2006). Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 51–72.Google Scholar
Lee, C., & Katz, A. (1998). The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar
Leggitt, J. S., & Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 29, 1–24.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. K., Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2006). The role of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 41, 3–24.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 433–450.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Strömberg, V., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2019). The ability to recognise emotions predicts the time-course of sarcasm processing: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1212–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pexman, P. M., Rostad, K. R., McMorris, C. A., Climie, E. A., Stowkowy, J., & Glenwright, M. R. (2011). Processing of ironic language in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 41, 1097–1112.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., & Zvaigzne, M. T. (2004). Does irony go better with friends? Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, L. H., Allen, R., Bull, R., Hering, A., Kliegel, M., & Channon, S. (2015). Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1840–1852.Google Scholar
Pickering, B., Thompson, D., & Filik, R. (2018). Examining the emotional impact of sarcasm using a virtual environment. Metaphor and Symbol, 33, 185–197.Google Scholar
Pomareda, C., Simkute, A., & Phillips, L. H. (2019). Age-related differences in the ability to decode intentions from nonliteral language. Acta Psychologica, 198, 102865.Google Scholar
Regel, S., Coulson, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2010). The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Brain Research, 1311, 121–135.Google Scholar
Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Isn’t It Ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 277–293.Google Scholar
Regel, S., Meyer, L., & Gunter, T. C. (2014). Distinguishing neurocognitive processes reflected by P600 effects: Evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations. PLoS ONE, 9, e96840.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreutz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5, 159–163.Google Scholar
Ruffman, T., Henry, J. D., Livingstone, V., & Phillips, L. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 863–881.Google Scholar
Slugoski, B., & Turnbull, W. (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter, and social relations. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 7, 101–121.Google Scholar
Spotorno, N., Koun, E., Prado, J., Van Der Henst, J. B., & Noveck, I. A. (2012). Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony. Neuroimage, 63, 25–39.Google Scholar
Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640–656.Google Scholar
Thompson, D., & Filik, R. (2016). Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 21, 105–120.Google Scholar
Thompson, D., Leuthold, H., & Filik, R. (2021). Examining the influence of perspective and prosody on expected emotional responses to irony: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, D., Mackenzie, I. G., Leuthold, H., & Filik, R. (2016). Emotional responses to irony and emoticons in written language: Evidence from EDA and facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 53, 1054–1062.Google Scholar
Toplak, M., & Katz, A. N. (2000). On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1467–1488.Google Scholar
Țurcan, A., & Filik, R. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1867–1893.Google Scholar
T¸urcan, A., & Filik, R. (2017). Investigating sarcasm comprehension using eye- tracking during reading: What are the roles of literality, familiarity, and echoic mention? In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 255–276). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Țurcan, A., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2020). Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 1966–1976.Google ScholarPubMed
Weissman, B., & Tanner, D. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PLoS ONE, 13, e0201727.Google Scholar
Whalen, J. M., Pexman, P. M., & Gill, A. J. (2009). “Should be fun—not!” Incidence and marking of verbal irony in email. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 263–280.Google Scholar
Zalla, T., Amsellem, F., Chaste, P., Ervas, F., Leboyer, M., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2014). Individuals with autism spectrum disorders do not use social stereotypes in irony comprehension. PLoS ONE, 9, e95568.Google Scholar
Zhu, N., & Filik, R. (2023 ). Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(3), 445–463.Google Scholar
Zhu, N., & Wang, Z. (2020). The paradox of sarcasm: Theory of mind and sarcasm use in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×