Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- Index
- References
Part II - Theoretical Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication , pp. 83 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Altman, K. E. and Nakayama, T. K. (1992). The fallacy of the assumption of a unitary culture. Paper presented at the ‘Speech Communication Association Convention’, Hilton and Towers Hotel, Chicago, IL, 1 November.Google Scholar
Applebaum, A. (2015). Donald Trump: spokesman for birthers, truthers and internet trolls. Washington Post, 21 August 2015. www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-and-the-hate-tweeters/2015/08/21/3c863846–4817-11e5–8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html?utm_term=.9ae6562a2cd0 (last accessed 13 December 2018).Google Scholar
Badash, D. (2015). ‘Hello N*gger’: conservatives welcome President Obama to Twitter. New Civil Rights Movement, 19 May 2015. www.Thenew civilrightsmovement.com/2015/05/1_hello_n_gger_conservatives_welcome_ president_obama_to_twitter (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Bateman, C. (2009). Now you can have your very own Kenyan birth certificate. Vanity Fair, August 2009. www.vanityfair.com/news/2009/08/now-you-can-have-your-very-own-kenyan-birth-certificate (last accessed 13 December 2018).Google Scholar
Bump, P. (2017). A conspiracy site with White House press credentials revives a debunked birther story. Washington Post, 10 March 2017. www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/10/a-conspiracy-site-with-white-house-press-credentials-revives-a-debunked-birther-story/?utm_term=.d1bf7123f b87 (last accessed 13 December 2018).Google Scholar
CINMR (Center for Intercultural New Media Research) (n.d.). www.interculturalnewmedia.com (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Cisneros, J. D. and Nakayama, T. K. (2015). New media, old racisms: Twitter, Miss America, and cultural logics of race. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(2), 108–27.Google Scholar
Collier, M. J. et al. (2001). Dialogue on the edges: ferment in communication and culture. In Collier, M. J., ed., Transforming Communication about Culture: Critical New Directions (International and Intercultural Communication Annual 24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H. (2015). Obama’s Twitter debut, @POTUS attracts hate-filled posts. New York Times, 22 May 2015, A19.Google Scholar
Dean, E., Hartmann, P. and Katzen, M. (1983). History in Black and White: An Analysis of South African School History Textbooks. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
De La Garza, A. T. and Ono, K. A. (2015). Retheorizing adaptation: differential adaptation and critical intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 8(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. (2014). Boston’s shame: racist tweets about P. K. Subban a Disgrace. Boston Globe, 1 May 2014. www.boston.com/sports/bruins-log/ 2014/05/01/bostons_shame_racist_tweets_about_pk_subban_a_disgrace (last accessed 18 November 2018).Google Scholar
Gibbs, S. (2016). Microsoft’s racist chatbot returns with drug-smoking Meltdown. Guardian, 30 March 2016. www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/30/microsoft-racist-sexist-chatbot-twitter-drugs (last accessed 17 November 2018).Google Scholar
Glum, J. (2017). Some republicans still think Obama was born in Kenya as Trump resurrects Birther conspiracy theory. Newsweek, 11 December 2017. www.newsweek.com/trump-birther-obama-poll-republicans-kenya-744195 (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T., Mendoza, S. L. and Drzewiecka, J.A. (2009). Critical junctures in intercultural communication studies: a review. The Review of Communication Journal, 9(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
Herrman, J. and Savage, C. (2018). Trump’s blocking of Twitter users is unconstitutional, judge says. New York Times, 24 May, B1.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. J. and Foucault Welles, B. (2016). #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, 19 (3), 397–418, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106571.Google Scholar
Khondker, H. H. (2011). Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 8(5), 675–9, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2011.621287.Google Scholar
Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I. and Boyd, d. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246/643 (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Lustig, M. W., Koester, J. and Halualani, R. (2017). Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Communication across Cultures. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Martin, J. N. and Nakayama, T. K. (1997). Intercultural Communication in Contexts. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Martin, J. N. and Nakayama, T. K. (1999). Thinking dialectically about culture and communication. Communication Theory, 9(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Moon, D. G. (1996). Concepts of ‘culture’: implications for intercultural communication research. Communication Quarterly, 44, 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, L. and Chow-White, P., eds. (2012). Race after the Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T. K. (1988). ‘Model minority’ and the media: discourse on Asian America. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 12(1), 65–73. DOI: 10.1177/019685998801200106.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Mis/reading Obama: evidence, the Internet and the battle over citizenship. In Brennen, B. S., ed., Assessing Evidence in a Postmodern World. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T. K. (2017). What’s next for whiteness and the Internet. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 68–72.Google Scholar
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, S. U. and Tynes, B. M., eds. (2016). The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ohlheiser, A. (2016). Trolls turned Tay, Microsoft’s fun millennial AI bot, into a genocidal maniac. Washington Post, 25 March 2016. www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/03/24/the-internet-turned-tay-microsofts-fun-millennial-ai-bot-into-a-genocidal-maniac/?utm term=. c70209b990 26 (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Ono, K. A. (2010). Reflections on problematizing ‘nation’ in intercultural communication research. In Nakayama, T. K. and Halualnai, R. T., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 84–97.Google Scholar
Ono, K. A. and Pham, V. N. (2009). Asian Americans and the Media. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, E. (2016). Trump kept ‘Birther’ beliefs going long after Obama’s birth certificate was released. NBC News, 16 September 2016. www.nbc news.com/politics/2016-election/trump-kept-birther-beliefs-going-long-after-obama-s-birth-n649346 (last accessed 13 December 2018).Google Scholar
Rosen, A. (2018). Online hate is spreading, and internet plaforms can’t stop it. Boston Globe, 1 November 2018. www.bostonglobe.com/business/2018/11/01/technology-has-fix-for-hate-spreading-online/Y2lIe5oh3aFa0gRWIwlJSN/story.html?event=event12# comments (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Sorrells, K. (2013). Intercultural Communication: Globalization and Social Justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Starosta, W. J. and Chen, G.-M. (2001). A fifth moment in intercultural communication? A dialogue. Paper presented at the ‘National Communication Association Convention’, Atlanta, GA, 2 November.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. (2012). Fans unleash racial garbage at Joel Ward. Washington Post, 26 April 2012. www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/fans-unleash-racial-garbage-at-joel-ward/2012/04/26/gIQA19lBiT_blog.html?utm_term=.2887d48 b90d3 (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Steyn, M. E. (2001). ‘Whiteness Just Isn’t What It Used To Be’: White Identity in a Changing South Africa. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Steyn, M. E. (2004). Rehabilitating a whiteness disgraced: Afrikaner ‘white talk’ in a post-Apartheid South Africa. Communication Quarterly, 54(2), 143–69.Google Scholar
Stuart-Ulin, C. R. (2018). Microsoft’s politically correct chatbot is even worse than its racist one. Quartz, 31 July 2018. https://qz.com/1340990/microsofts-politically-correct-chat-bot-is-even-worse-than-its-racist-one/ (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
TayTweets (n.d.). https://twitter.com/tayandyou?lang=en (last accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
References
Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R. and Van Hoorn, A. (2015). Are scores on Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture stable over time? A cohort analysis. Global Strategy Journal, 5(3), 223–40.Google Scholar
Beugelsdijk, S. and Welzel, C. (2018). Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), 1469–505.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture: The Chinese Culture Connection. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–64.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (2019). Traveling from the past into the future of cross-cultural psychology: a personal-scientific journey. In Hwang, D. and Hwang, H. C., eds., Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Carraher, S. M. (2003). The father of cross-cultural research: an interview with Geert Hofstede. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 98.Google Scholar
Elkington, R. and Tuleja, E. A. (2017). How the communal philosophies of Ubuntu in Africa and Confucius thought in China might enrich western notions of leadership. In Chin, J. L., Trimble, J. E. and Garcia, J. E., eds., Global and Culturally Diverse Leaders and Leadership: New Dimensions and Challenges for Business, Education and Society. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (2009). Where is culture in cross cultural research? An outline of a multilevel research process for measuring culture as a shared meaning system. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 9(1), 25–49.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. and Schwartz, S. (2011). Whence differences in value priorities?: individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1127–44. DOI: 10.1177/0022022110381429.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2003). An exploration of cultural variation in self-enhancing and self-improving motivations. In Murphy-Berman, V. and Berman, J. J., eds., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives and the self. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 101–28.Google Scholar
Hills, M. D. (2002). Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s values orientation theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(4), 3. DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2006). What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 882–96.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1339–46.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 9. DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. and Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. and Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J. and De Luque, M. S. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 897–914.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: an exploration in definition and classification. In Parsons, T. and Shils, E., eds., Toward a General Theory of Action. Boston: Harvard University Press, pp. 388–433.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, F. R. and Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Oxford: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Leung, K. and Van de Vijver, F. J. (2008). Strategies for strengthening causal inferences in cross cultural research: the consilience approach. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 8(2), 145–69.Google Scholar
McSweeney, B. (2013). Fashion founded on a flaw: the ecological mono-deterministic fallacy of Hofstede, GLOBE, and followers. International Marketing Review, 30(5), 483–504.Google Scholar
McSweeney, B., Brown, D. and Iliopoulou, S. (2016). Claiming too much, delivering too little: testing some of Hofstede’s generalisations. The Irish Journal of Management, 35(1), 34–57.Google Scholar
Minkov, M. (2013). Cross-Cultural Analysis: The Science and Art of Comparing the World’s Modern Societies and Their Cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Minkov, M. (2018). A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: old evidence and new data from 56 countries. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(2), 231–56.Google Scholar
Minkov, M., Bond, M. H., Dutt, P., Schachner, M., Morales, O., Sanchez, C., Jandosova, J., Khassenbekov, Y. and Mudd, B. (2018). A reconsideration of Hofstede’s fifth dimension: new flexibility versus monumentalism data from 54 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 52(3), 309–33.Google Scholar
Minkov, M., Dutt, P., Schachner, M., Morales, O., Sanchez, C., Jandosova, J., Khassenbekov, Y. and Mudd, B. (2017). A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: a new national index from a 56-country study. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 386–404.Google Scholar
Minkov, M. and Hofstede, G. (2012). Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 133–59.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. F. (2004). Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies [book review]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 641–7.Google Scholar
Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., Alas, R., Wangenheim, F., Darder, F. L., Kuo, C. and Potocan, V. (2011). A twenty-first century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kâğitçibaşi, Ç., Choi, S. C. and Yoon, G., eds., Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology 18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 85–119.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137–82.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Cultural Value Orientations: Nature and Implications of National Differences. Moscow: Publishing House of SU HSE.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2006). When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: the GLOBE and Hofstede projects. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 915–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storo, J. and Jansen, A. (2007). The Norwegian man as father. Child Research Net. www.childresearch.net/ papers/parenting/2007_05.htlm (last accessed 2 August 2018).Google Scholar
World Values Survey. Who we are. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp (last accessed 27 July 2018).Google Scholar
References
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1974). Theories in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Berthoin Antal, A. and Friedman, V. (2008). Learning to negotiate reality: a strategy for teaching intercultural competencies. Journal of Management Education, 32(3), 363–86.Google Scholar
Busch, D. (2009). The notion of culture in linguistic research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), art. 50, 1–24.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, D. and Berry, M. (2001). Communication history, Finnish and American discourses: an ethnographic contribution to intercultural communication inquiry. Communication Theory, 11(3), 352–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dervin, F. (2011). A plea for change in research on intercultural discourses: a ‘liquid’ approach to the study of the acculturation of Chinese students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
Dervin, F. and Keihäs, L. (2013). Johdanto uuteen kulttuurienväliseen viestintään ja kasvatukseen [Introduction to new intercultural communication and education]. Helsinki: FERA.Google Scholar
Dervin, F. and Tournebise, C. (2013). Turbulence in intercultural education: does it affect higher education? Intercultural Education, 24(6), 532–43.Google Scholar
Frame, A. (2014). On cultures and interactions: theorizing the complexity of intercultural encounters. In Poutiainen, S., ed., Theoretical Turbulence in Intercultural Communication Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 29–44.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. (2014). Negotiating reality: intercultural communication as constructing social space. In Poutiainen, S., ed., Theoretical Turbulence in Intercultural Communication Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. and Berthoin Antal, A. (2005). Negotiating reality: an action science approach to intercultural competence. Management Learning, 36(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T. ed. (2014). Online discussion forum: international and intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(1). DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2014.869524.Google Scholar
Hart, W. B. (1999). Interdisciplinary influences in the study of intercultural relations: a citation analysis of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 575–89.Google Scholar
Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S. and Pujolar, J. (2018). Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues That Matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Isotalus, E. and Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L. (2017). Ethics and intercultural communication in diversity management. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 37(5), 450–69.Google Scholar
Jensen, I. and Andreasen, L. B. (2014). Methods for researching intercultural communication in globalized complex societies. In Poutiainen, S., ed., Theoretical Turbulence in Intercultural Communication Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 45–61.Google Scholar
Kersten, A. (2000). Diversity management: dialogue, dialectics & diversion. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(3), 235–48. DOI: 10.1108/09534810010330887.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lahti, M. (2015). Communicating Interculturality in the Workplace. Doctoral dissertation (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 262), Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Lane, P. (2014). Nexus analysis: an action oriented approach to discourse. In Östman, J.-O. and Verschueren, J., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics: 2014 Installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1075/hop.18.nex1.Google Scholar
Moulakis, A. (2003). The trouble with intercultural communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(2), 11–40.Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, I. (2005). Tieteellisyyden haaste [The challenge of multidisciplinarity]. Lecture presented to the ‘Proact Annual Seminar’, 1 February, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2014). Circulation of indigenous Sámi resources across media spaces: a rhizomatic discourse approach. In Androutsopoulos, J., ed., Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 515–38.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2015). Multilingual dynamics in Sámiland: rhizomatic discourses on changing language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 206–25. DOI: 10.1177/1367006913489199.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2016). Critical debates: discourse boundaries and social change. In Coupland, N., ed., Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–81.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S., Compton, S. and Dlaske, K. (2015). Putting resources into practice: a nexus analysis of knowledge mobilisation activities in language research and multilingual communities. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(3), 187–200. DOI: 10.1080/14664208.2015.972533.Google Scholar
Piller, I. (2012). Intercultural communication: an overview. In Bratt Paulson, C., Kiesling, S. F. and Rangel, E. S., eds., The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Poutiainen, S., ed. (2014). Theoretical Turbulence in Intercultural Communication Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Salo-Lee, L. (2003). Intercultural communication as intercultural dialogue: revisiting intercultural competence. In Kistler, P. and Konivuori, S., eds., From International Exchanges to Intercultural Communication: Combining Theory and Practice. Jyväskylä: EMICC and University of Jyväskylä, pp. 121–8.Google Scholar
Salo-Lee, L. (2007). Towards cultural literacy. In Kaivola, T. and Melén-Paaso, M., eds., Education for Global Responsibility: Finnish Perspectives. Helsinki: Ministry of Education, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
Salo-Lee, L. (2015). Intercultural communication as intercultural dialogue: challenges and new paths. In Jiang, F., ed., China Intercultural Communication Annual. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, pp. 174–215.Google Scholar
Salo-Lee, L. and Crawford, B. (2017). Intercultural communication study in Finland. In Kim, Y. Y., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. DOI: 10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0081.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1997). Current trends in intercultural communication studies. Lecture presented to the School of English Language Communication, revised 3 April, Beijing Foreign Studies University, China.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (2002). Intercultural communication as nexus analysis. Logos and Language: Journal of General Linguistics Theory, 3(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, W. S. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., Scollon, W. S. and Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural Interaction: Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Törrönen, M. (2001). Tulkintoja dialogisuudesta projektijohtajuudessa [Interpretations about dialogicality in project leadership]. Master’s thesis, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
References
Adichie, C. N. (2009). The danger of a single story. TEDGlobal. Online video. www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story#t-1067848 (last accessed 10 August 2018).Google Scholar
Antor, H. (1995). Alterität als literaturhistorisches Problem. In Ahrens, R., Bald, W. D. and Hüllen, W., eds., Handbuch Englisch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, pp. 323–5.Google Scholar
Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-First-Century Fiction: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bredella, L. (2002). Literarisches und Interkulturelles Verstehen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Byram, M., Gribkova, B. and Starkley, H. (2002). Developing the Intercultural Dimension in Language Teaching: A Practical Introduction for Teachers. Language Policy Division. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1992). ‘This strange institution called literature’: an interview with Jacques Derrida. In Attridge, D., ed., Acts of Literature. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Gymnich, M. (2015). Uniwissen. Interkulturelle Kompetenzen. Erfolgreich Kommunizieren zwischen den Kulturen. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. (1999). ‘When the self is an other’: Vergleichende erzähltheoretische und postkoloniale Überlegungen zur Identitäts(de)konstruktion in der (exil)indischen Gegenwartsliteratur. Anglia, 117(1), 71–96. DOI: 10.1515/angl.1999.117.1.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitag-Hild, B. (2010). Theorie, Aufgabentypologie und Unterrichtspraxis inter- und transkultureller Literaturdidaktik. British Fictions of Migration im Fremdsprachenunterricht (Studies in English Literary and Cultural History 42). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Glissant, É. (1997). Poetics of Relation. Trans. Wing, Betsy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goyal, Y. (2017). The transnational turn and postcolonial studies. In Goyal, Y., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Transnational American Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
Hallemeier, K. (2014). Literary cosmopolitanism in Teju Cole’s Every Day is for the Thief and Open City. ARIEL, 44(2–3), 239–50. DOI: 10.1353/ari.2013.0023.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1981). The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2018). Twenty-first-century fictional experiments with emotion and cognition. In Baumbach, S. and Neumann, B., eds., Novel Approaches to the 21st-Century Anglophone Novel. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krishnan, M. (2015). Postcoloniality, spatiality and cosmopolitanism in the open city. Textual Practice, 29(4), 675–96. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2014.987686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, C. (2015). Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lüsebrink, H. J. (2008). Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Interaktion – Fremdwahrnehmung – Kulturtransfer. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
McDaniel, E., Samovar, L. A. and Porter, R. E. (2009). Understanding intercultural communication: the working principles. In McDaniel, E., Samovar, L. A. and Porter, R. E., eds. Intercultural Communication: A Reader. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
Neumann, B. (2016). Liberationist political poetics: the Caribbean artists movement. In Osborne, D., ed., Cambridge Companion to British Black and Asian Literature (1945–2010). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
Neumann, B. (2018). Fictions of migration: Monica Ali’s Brick Lane (2003), Andrea Levy’s Small Island (2004) and Gautam Malkani’s Londonstani (2006). In Nünning, V., ed., The British Novel in the 21st Century: Cultural Concerns – Literary Developments – Model Interpretations. Trier: WVT, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
Neumann, B. and Kappel, Y. (2019). Music and latency in Teju Cole’s Open City: presences of the past. ARIEL, 50 (1), 31–62.Google Scholar
Neumann, B. and Nünning, A. (2011). An Introduction to the Study of Narrative Fiction. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Nünning, A. (2002). Historicizing British cultural studies: patriotic xenophobia and the rhetoric of national character in eighteenth-century British literature. Journal for the Study of British Culture 9(1), 69–94.Google Scholar
Perfect, M. (2014). Contemporary Fictions of Multiculturalism: Diversity and the Millennial London Novel. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pfister, M. (1974). Studien zum Wandel der Perspektivenstruktur in Elisabethanischen und Jakobäischen Komödien. Munich: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Richter, V. (2007). Andrea Levy, Small Island: imagining multiracial conviviality in British postwar culture. In Döring, T., ed., A History of Postcolonial Literature in 12½ Books. Trier: WVT, pp. 155–68.Google Scholar
Rupp, J. (2010). Genre and Memory in Black British Literature (Studies in English Literary and Cultural History 47). Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Schoene, B. (2017). Contemporary American literature as world literature: cruel cosmopolitanism, cosmopoetics, and the search for a worldlier American novel. Anglia, 135(1), 86–104.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. (1998). The Rise and Fall of English. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1977). Die Semantisierung der Form: Zum Inhaltskonzept Jurij Lotmans. Russian Literature, 5, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, R. (2001). Fictions of Migration: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie und Gattungstypologie des zeitgenössischen interkulturellen Romans in Großbritannien. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. and Surkamp, C. (2002) ‘Mit anderen Augen’ – Multikulturalismus und Fremdverstehen am Beispiel ausgewählter britischer multikultureller Erzähltexte. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, 4, 227–37.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, P. (2015). Contemporary Literature and the End of the Novel: Creature, Affect, Form. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Volkmann, L. (1999). Universal truths or ethnic peculiarities? On tensions inherent in the reception of postcolonial and minority literature. In Antor, H. and Cope, K. L., eds., Intercultural Encounters: Studies in English Literatures. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, pp. 131–52.Google Scholar
References
Alcoff, L. M. (2007). Epistemologies of ignorance: three types. In Sullivan, S. and Tuana, N., eds., Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Biesecker, B. A. (1998). Rhetorical studies and the ‘new’ psychoanalysis: what is the real problem? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84(2), 222–40.Google Scholar
Biesecker, B. A. (2002). Remembering World War II: the rhetoric and politics of national commemoration at the turn of the 21st century. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88(4), 393–409.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2001). States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dervin, F. and Machart, R., eds. (2015). Cultural Essentialism in Intercultural Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
deTar, M. (2016) Absence of the present: the reburial of Adnan Menderes and the condition of possibility of public memory in Turkey. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(1), 93–108.Google Scholar
Domagała, M. (2016). Żydowska spółdzielnia mieszkaniowa. Wymazana część historii miasta. Gazeta Wyborcza, 7 February. http://lublin.wyborcza.pl/lublin/7,164873,23680162,zydowska-spoldzielnia-mieszkaniowa-wymazana-czesc-historii.html (last accessed 22 March 2019).Google Scholar
Drzewiecka, J. A. (2014). Aphasia and a legacy of violence: disabling and enabling knowledge of the past in Poland. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(4), 362–81.Google Scholar
Drzewiecka, J. A., Ehrenhaus, P. and Owen, A. S. (2016). Memory, culture and difference: critical reflections. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(3), 199–203.Google Scholar
Drzewiecka, J. A. and Hasian, A. M. (2018). Discourses of the wound and desire of the other: remembrances of the Katyń Massacre and the Smoleńsk Crash. Communication Review, 18(3), 231–48.Google Scholar
Flieger, E. (2016). ‘Dobra zmiana’ w Muzeum II Wojny Światowej chce poprawić Jedwabne. Gazeta Wyborcza, 2 February. http://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,23030742,dobra-zmiana-w-muzeum-ii-wojny-swiatowej-chce-poprawic-jedwabne.html (last accessed 22 March 2019).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gross, J. T. (2001). Neighbors: The Destruction of Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Gunn, J (2004). Refitting fantasy: psychoanalysis, subjectivity, and talking to the dead. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Han, L. (2013). Our home is here: history, memory, and identity in the Museum of Chinese in America. Communication, Culture and Critique, 6(1), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasian, M. Jr and Carlson, A. C. (2000). Revisionism and collective memory: The struggle for meaning in the Amistad affair. Communications Monographs, 67(1), 42–62.Google Scholar
Hoerl, K. (2008). Mississippi’s social transformation in public memories of the trial against Byron de la Beckwith for the murder of Medgar Evers. Western Journal of Communication, 72(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
Hoops, J. and Drzewiecka, J. A. (2017). Critical approaches to culture and communication. In Nussbaum, J. F., ed., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kuraś, B. (2016a). ‘Skupiska żydowskie przepędzi się…’. Napady w Rabce na dzieci ocalałe z Holokaustu. Gazeta Wyborcza, 9 June. http://krakow.wyborcza.pl/krakow/1,42699,20214234,skupiska-zydowskie-przepedzi-sie-napady-w-rabce-na-dzieci.html (last accessed 19 March 2019).Google Scholar
Kuraś, B. (2016b). Wniosek z dziennikarskiego dochodzenia: ‘Ogniowcy’ mordowali Żydów. Gazeta Wyborcza, 4 May. http://krakow.wyborcza.pl/krakow/1,44425,20015419,wniosek-z-dziennikarskiego-dochodzenia-ogniowcy-mordowali.html (last accessed 22 March 2019).Google Scholar
Lundberg, C. (2004). The royal road not taken. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(4), 495–500.Google Scholar
Lundberg, C. (2012). On being bound to equivalential chains. Cultural Studies, 26(2–3), 299–318.Google Scholar
Ott, B. L., Aoki, E. and Dickinson, G. (2011). Ways of (not) seeing guns: presence and absence at the Cody Firearms Museum. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(3), 215–39.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. A. (2018). Spaces of emergent memory: Detroit’s 8 Mile wall and public memories of civil rights injustice. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(3), 197–212.Google Scholar
Oushakine, S. (2000). In the state of post-Soviet aphasia: symbolic development in contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 52(6), 991–1016.Google Scholar
Owen, S. and Ehrenhaus, P. (2010). Communities of memory, entanglements, and claims of the past on the present: reading race trauma through The Green Mile, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(2), 131–54.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. (2005). Passions of identification: discourse, enjoyment and European identity. In Howarth, D. and Torfing, J., eds., Discourse Theory in European Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 68–92.Google Scholar
Steyn, M (2012). The ignorance contract: recollections of apartheid childhoods and the construction of epistemologies of ignorance. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 19(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. (2011). Colonial aphasia: race and disabled histories in France. Public Culture, 23(1), 121–56.Google Scholar
Stormer, N. (2010). A likely past: abortion, social data, and a collective memory of secrets in 1950s America. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7(4), 337–59,Google Scholar
Sulowski, K. (2016). Senator PiS o Muzeum Polin: ‘Stało się narzędziem politycznym’. Gazeta Wyborcza, 3 February. http://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/7,54420,23149984,senator-pis-o-muzeum-polin-stalo-sie-narzedziem-politycznym.html (last accessed 22 March 2019).Google Scholar
Wiśniewska, K. (2016). Żydzi, profanacja i cud. Ksiądz-historyk odgrzewa antysemickie opowieści. Gazeta Wyborcza, 31 August. http://wroclaw.wyborcza.pl/wroclaw/1,35771,20622214,zydzi-profanacja-i-cud-ksiadz-historyk-odgrzewa-antysemickie.html (last accessed 22 March 2019).Google Scholar
Zelizer, B. (1998). Remembering to Forget: Holocaust Memory through the Camera’s Eye. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
References
Alexander, B. K., Arasaratnam, L. A., Durham, A., Flores, L., Leeds-Hurwitz, Mendoza, Oetzel, S. L., Osland, J. G., Tsuda, J., Y., Yin, J. and Halualani, R. (2014). Identifying key intercultural urgencies, issues, and challenges in today’s world: connecting our scholarship to dynamic contexts and historical moments. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 38–67.Google Scholar
Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–36.Google Scholar
Asante, M. K. (2003). The Afrocentric idea in education. In Conyers, J. L., ed., Afrocentricity and the Academy: Essays on Theory and Practice. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J., eds. (2011). The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. (2015). The Dark Net: Inside the Digital Underworld. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Beyerstein, B. L. (2001). Alternative medicine and common errors of reasoning. Academic Medicine, 76(3), 230–37.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2010). Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism & Racial Inequality in Contemporary America, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Broome, B. J. (2013). Building cultures of peace: the role of intergroup dialogue. In Oezel, J. G. and Ting-Toomey, S., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 737–62.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C., ed. (2002). Sociology. In Calhoun, C., ed., Dictionary of the Social Sciences. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheah, W. H., Karamehic-Muratovic, A., Matsuo, H. and Poljarevic, A. (2011). The role of language competence, interpersonal relationships, and media use in Bosnian refugees’ resettlement process. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 40(3), 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. W., Lawless, B. and González, A. (2015). Relating across difference for social change: calling attention to inter/cultural partnerships in nonprofit contexts. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(3), 187–92.Google Scholar
Chertoff, M. (2017). A public policy perspective of the dark web. Journal of Cyber Policy, 2(1), 26–38. DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2017.1298643.Google Scholar
Collier, M. J., Hegde, R. S., Lee, W. S., Nakayama, T. K. and Yep, G. A. (2001). Dialogue on the edges: ferment in communication and culture. In Collier, M. J., ed., Transforming Communication about Culture: Critical New Directions, International and Intercultural Communication Annual, vol. 24. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 219–80.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (2005). Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooks, L. (2001). From distance and uncertainty to research and pedagogy in the borderlands: implications for the future of intercultural communication. Communication Theory, 11(3), 339–51.Google Scholar
Coopman, T. M. (2011). Networks of dissent: emergent forms in media based collective action. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(2), 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. (2009). Editorial. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 215–16.Google Scholar
Croucher, S. M., Sommier, M. and Rahmani, D. (2015). Intercultural communication: where we’ve been, where we’re going, issues we face. Communication Research and Practice, 1(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S. and Craig, D. (2016). Online entertainment: a new wave of media globalization? International Journal of Communication, 10, 5409–25.Google Scholar
De Vries, R. E. (2002). Ethnic tension in paradise: explaining ethnic supremacy aspirations in Fiji. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(3), 311–27.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. (2018). Negotiating structural absences: voices of indigenous subalterns of eastern India. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47(1), 52–71.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. (2019). Conducting ethnographic research in low literate, economically weak underserved spaces: an introduction to visual aided interaction. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919855279.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. and Das, S. (2015). Digital divide at the margins: co-designing information solutions to address needs of indigenous populations of rural India. Communication Design Quarterly, 4(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. and Martin, J. N. (2017). Theoretical perspectives in intercultural communication. In Chen, L., ed., Handbook of Intercultural Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., ed. (1977). Language, Countermemory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fuhse, A. A. (2012). Embedding the stranger: ethnic categories and cultural differences in social networks. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(6), 639–55.Google Scholar
Gauthier, B. (2009). Creating anxiety: setting the stage for intercultural communication. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 721–23.Google Scholar
González, A., and Peterson, T. R. (1993). Enlarging conceptual boundaries: a critique of research in intercultural communication. In Bowen, S. P., ed., Transforming Visions: Feminist Critiques in Communication Studies. New York: Hampton Press, pp. 249–78.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (1986). Towards a Theory of Intergroup Communication. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication: making the mesh of the net finer. In Gudykunst, W. B., ed., Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 281–332.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. and Kim, Y. Y. (1984). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. and Shapiro, R. B. (1996). Communication in everyday interpersonal and intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(1), 19–45.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T., Mendoza, S. L. and Drzewiecka, J. A. (2009). Critical junctures in intercultural communication studies: a review, The Review of Communication Journal, 9(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T. and Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Critical intercultural communication studies at a crossroads. In Halualani, R. T. and Nakayama, T. K., eds., The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Harman, L. D. (1988). The Modern Stranger: On Language and Membership. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of posttruth, postpolitics, and attention economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(2), 327–33.Google Scholar
Hart, W. B. (1999). Interdisciplinary influences in the study of intercultural relations: a citation analysis of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 575–90.Google Scholar
Hartelius, E. J. (2016). ‘Undocumented and unafraid’? Challenging the bureaucratic paradigm. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(2), 130–49.Google Scholar
Hasian, M. Jr (2012). The Philippine–American war and the American debates about the necessity and legality of the ‘water cure’ 1901–1903. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), 106–23.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Horgan, M. (2012). Strangers & strangership. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(6), 607–22.Google Scholar
Ingraham, C. and Reeves, J. (2016). New media, new panics. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(5), 455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. (2017). Sociolinguistic approach to intercultural communication. In Kim, Y. Y., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0068 (last accessed 1 February 2019).Google Scholar
Jana, S., Basu, I., Rotheram-Borus, M. J. and Newman, P. A. (2004). The Sonagachi Project: a sustainable community intervention program. AIDS education and prevention, 16(5), 405–14.Google Scholar
Kethineni, S., Cao, Y. and Dodge, C. (2018). Use of bitcoin in darknet markets: examining facilitative factors on bitcoin-related crimes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 141–57.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. Y. (2005) Adapting to a new culture: an integrative communication theory. In Gudykunst, W., ed., Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 375–400.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. Y. (2008). Intercultural personhood: globalization and a way of being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 359–68.Google Scholar
Kochhar, R. (2015). A Global Middle Class Is More Promise than Reality: From 2001 to 2011, Nearly 700 Million Step Out of Poverty, But Most Only Barely. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. www.pewglobal. org/2015/07/08/a-global-middle-class-is-more-promise-than-reality (last accessed 1 February 2019).Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. (2001). Intercultural communication. In Carter, R. and Nunan, D., eds., The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–6.Google Scholar
Landis, D. and Wasilewski, J. H. (1999). Reflections on 22 years of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations and 23 years in other areas of intercultural practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 535–74.Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2012). On studying interethnic communication between the Hakka and other ethnic groups in Taiwan. Intercultural Communication Studies, 21(3), 29–40.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S., Chung, J., Wang, J., and Hertel, E. (1995). A sociohistorical approach to intercultural communication. Howard Journal of Communications, 6(4), 262–91.Google Scholar
Makin, D. A. and Morczek, A. L. (2016). X views and counting: interest in rape-oriented pornography as gendered microaggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(12), 2131–55.Google Scholar
Mancinelli, I., Comparelli, A., Girardi, P. and Tatarelli, R. (2002). Mass suicide: historical and psychodynamic considerations. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 32(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marotta, V. (2012). Georg Simmel, the stranger and the sociology of knowledge. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(6), 675–89.Google Scholar
Mendoza, S. L. and Kinefuchi, E. (2016). Two stories, one vision: a plea for an ecological turn in intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 275–94.Google Scholar
Merkin, R., Taras, V. and Steel, P. (2014). State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: a systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 1–23.Google Scholar
Miller, A. N., Kizito, M. N. and Ngula, K. W. (2010). Research and publication by communication faculty in East Africa: a challenge to the global community of communication scholars. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 3(4), 286–303.Google Scholar
Moon, D. G. (2010). Critical reflections on culture and critical intercultural communication. In Nakayama, T. K. and Halualani, R. T., eds., Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 34–52.Google Scholar
Moon, D. G. (2016). ‘Be/coming’ white and the myth of white ignorance: identity projects in white communities. Western Journal of Communication, 80(3), 282–303.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H. and Stolte, J. F. (2017). Power in intergroup communication. In Kim, Y. Y., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0170 (last accessed 1 February 2019).Google Scholar
Nshom, E. (2016). Predictors of Finnish adolescents’ prejudice towards Russian immigrants and the effect of intergroup contact. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Padel, F. and Das, S. (2010). Out of this Earth: East India Adivasis and the Aluminium Cartel. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881–93.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R. Wagner, U. and Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–80.Google Scholar
Polson, E. (2011). Belonging to the network society: social media and the production of a new global middle class. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(2), 144–63.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1999). Georg Simmel’s concept of the stranger and intercultural communication research. Communication Theory, 9(1), 58–74.Google Scholar
Samochowiec, J. and Florack, A. (2010). Intercultural contact under uncertainty: the impact of predictability and anxiety on the willingness to interact with a member from an unknown cultural group. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(4), 507–15.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. (2010). Making space for the ‘nuances of truth’: communication and uncertainty at an environmental journalists’ workshop. Science Communication, 32(2), 171–201.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1944). The stranger: an essay in social psychology. The American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.Google Scholar
Shuter, R. (2012). Intercultural new media studies: the next frontier in intercultural communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 219–37.Google Scholar
Shi, Y. (2011). Creating new subjectivities: the resistant tactics of the dislocated people in China’s real estate development. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(3), 275–95.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1908). The sociological significance of the ‘stranger’. In Park, R. E. and Burgess, E. W., eds., 1921, Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 322–7.Google Scholar
Simons, G. F. and Fennig, C. D., eds. (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 21st ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Stephens, N. P. (2014). Toward a more substantive media ecology: Postman’s metaphor versus posthuman futures. International Journal of Communication, 8, 19.Google Scholar
Striley, K. M. and Lawson, S. (2014). Theorizing communication orientations of privilege: how white discourses (de)construct Australian aboriginals. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(2), 170–91.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. D. and Cimadevilla, G. (2010). Usos y abusos del participare. Buenos Aires: Ediciones INTA.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (2007). Intercultural conflict training: theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 255–71.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Conflict face-negotiation theory: tracking its evolutionary journey. In Dai, X. and Chen, G.-M., eds., Conflict Management and Intercultural Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 123–43.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working paper no. ESA/P/WP/248. https://esa.un.org /unpd/wpp/ publications/ (last accessed 17 July 2018).Google Scholar
Viswanath, K. and Ackerson, L. K. (2011). Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: a nationally-representative cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 6(1), 145–50.Google Scholar
Willink, K. G., Gutierrez-Perez, R., Shukri, S. and Stein, L. (2014). Navigating with the stars: critical qualitative methodological constellations for critical intercultural communication research. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(4), 289–316.Google Scholar
Worldometers (2018). World population. www.worldometers.info/world-population/#region (last accessed 7 August 2018).Google Scholar
References
Apel, K.-O. (1980). Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, trans. Adey, G. and Frisby, D.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Casmir, F. L. (1997). Ethics, culture, and communication: an application of the third-culture building model to international and intercultural communication. In Casmir, F. L., ed., Ethics in Intercultural and International Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 89–118.Google Scholar
Collste, G., ed. (2016). Ethics and Communication: Global Perspectives. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2000). The concept of ‘third cultures’ in intercultural ethics. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 10(4), 126–9.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2004). Universalist, relativist, and constructivist approaches to intercultural ethics. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28(5), 439–58.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2006a). Integration in intercultural ethics. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(4), 421–37.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2006b). Intercultural ethics: a constructivist approach. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 9, 89–102.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2011). Bioregionalism and Global Ethics: A Transactional Approach to Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Social Justice, and Human Well-Being. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2012). Integration. In Kirloskar-Steinbach, M., Dharampal-Frick, G., and Friele, M., eds., Key and Contested Concepts in Intercultural Discourse. Munich: Karl Alber, pp. 139–45.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2015a). A communicative approach to intercultural dialogue on ethics. In Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R. and Roy, C. S., eds., Intercultural Communication: A Reader, 14th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, pp. 417–21.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2015b). Intercultural philosophy and constructivist dialogue on cross-cultural norms. Delti, 5, 77–89.Google Scholar
Evanoff, R. (2016). Towards a philosophy of intercultural norms. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 19, 129–50.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Lenhardt, C. and Weber, S.. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. and Lukes, S., eds. (1982). Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1975 [1739–40]). A Treatise Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-S. (2008). Intercultural norms. In Donsbach, W., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Communication, vol. 6. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 2352–54.Google Scholar
Macer, D. (2006). A Cross-cultural Introduction to Bioethics. Christchurch, NZ: Eubios Ethics Institute.Google Scholar
Marmor, A. (2009). Social Conventions: From Language to Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2005). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently – And Why. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Singer, M. (1987 ). Intercultural Communication: A Perceptual Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (2011). Intercultural communication ethics. In Cheney, G., May, S. and Munshi, D., eds., The Handbook of Communication Ethics. London: Routledge, pp. 335–52.Google Scholar
Wallner, F.G. (1994). Constructive Realism: Aspects of a New Epistemological Movement (Philosophica 11). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. (1996). Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by