Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:33:36.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Intelligence in Adulthood

from Part II - Development of Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

By
Christopher Hertzog
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Adult intellectual development is known to produce a pattern of average age-related changes differing by whether the ability in question is dominated by acquired knowledge (crystallized intelligence) or by processes involved in reasoning and memory, especially working memory (fluid intelligence). Other differentiable abilities, like spatial visualization, also show average age-related decline. Both classes of abilities have shown substantial generational differences, with more recently born individuals showing better performance on tests of intellectual abilities. Genetic influences play a role in determining age-related change, but other factors are also at play. There is substantial stability of individual differences in intellectual abilities, showing that aging does not radically alter profiles of abilities seen in early adulthood. There are individual differences in magnitudes of age-related changes that are exacerbated by nonnormative age-related diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes), life events, health-degrading behaviors (e.g., tobacco use), and late-life terminal decline. Individual differences in rates of age-related change are partly general (manifested for all abilities) but also ability specific (different persons showing decline on some abilities but not others), perhaps indicating multiple influences on age-related changes. At present it is unknown how much of the observed age-related decline could be mitigated by lifestyle and behavioral interventions prior to the period of late-life disablement. Age-related changes in fluid intelligence do not necessarily translate into functional impairment in demanding everyday activities, given the critical role that knowledge and experience play in self-regulation.

Keywords

agingcohort effectsstabilitylifestyle factorsterminal decline
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 181 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. (2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc personality and interest correlates. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55, P69–P84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.Google Scholar
Alwin, D. F. (2009). History, cohorts, and patterns of cognitive aging. In Bosworth, H. B. & Hertzog, C. (Eds.), Aging and cognition: Research methodologies and empirical advances (pp. 9–38). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Anstey, K. J., Hofer, S. M., & Luszcz, M. A. (2003). Cross-sectional and longitudinal patterns of dedifferentiation in late-life cognitive and sensory function: The effects of age, ability, attrition, and occasion of measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 470–487.Google Scholar
Bäckman, L., & Small, B. J. (2007). Cognitive deficits in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia: Patterns of findings from the Kungsholmen project. Physiology and Behavior, 92, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmer, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 2271–2281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as a foundation for developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., & Labouvie, G. V. (1973). Adult development of intellectual performance: Description, explanation, and modification. In Eisdorfer, C. & Lawton, M. P. (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 157–219). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1970). Multivariate longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences for analyzing ontogenetic and generational change: A methodological note. Developmental Psychology, 2, 163–168.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basak, C., Boot, W. R., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Can training in a real-time strategy videogame attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 23, 765–777.Google Scholar
Beier, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: Promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychology and Aging, 20, 341–355.Google Scholar
Berg, S. (1996). Aging, behavior, and terminal decline. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 323–337). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Birren, J. E. (1964). The psychology of aging. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bosworth, H. B., Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1999). Cognitive and sociodemographic risk factors for mortality in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54, P273–P282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botwinick, J. (1977). Intellectual abilities. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 580–605). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Brickley, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Wolfle, L. M. (1995). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities: Test of the structure of intellect across the adult life span. Intelligence, 20, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchman, A. S., Tanne, D., Boyle, P. A., Shah, R. C., Leurgans, S. E., & Bennett, D. A. (2009). Kidney function is associated with the rate of cognitive decline in the elderly. Neurology, 73, 920–927.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. C., Saczynski, J. S., Rebok, G. W., McGill, S., Tielsch, J., Glass, T. A., et al. (2008). Exploring the effects of an everyday activity program on executive function and memory in older adults: Experience Corps. The Gerontologist, 48, 793–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Charness, N. (1981). Aging and skilled problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 21–38.Google Scholar
Cianciolo, A. T., Matthew, C., Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 613–632). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colcombe, S., & Kramer, A. F. (2003). Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Science, 14, 125–130.Google Scholar
Colonia-Willner, R. (1998). Practical intelligence at work: Relationships between aging and cognitive efficiency among managers in a bank environment. Psychology and Aging, 13, 45–57.Google Scholar
Czaja, S., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogers, W. A., et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 333–352.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Starr, J. M., Whalley, L. J., & Fox, H. C. (2004). The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: Following up the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 130–147.Google Scholar
deFrias, C. M., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., & Nilsson, L-G. (2007). Revisiting the de-differentiation hypothesis with longitudinal multi-cohort data. Intelligence, 35, 381–392.Google Scholar
Eggermont, L. H. P., Milberg, W. P., Lipsitz, L. A., Scherder, E. J. A., & Leveille, S. G. (2009). Physical activity and executive function in aging: The MOBILIZE Boston study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 57, 1750–1756.Google Scholar
Ferrer, E., Salthouse, T. A., McArdle, J. J., Stewart, W. F., & Schwartz, B. S. (2005). Multivariate modeling of age and retest in longitudinal studies of cognitive abilities. Psychology and Aging, 20, 412–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, E., Salthouse, T. A., Stewart, W. F., & Schwartz, B. S. (2004). Modeling age and retest processes in longitudinal studies of cognitive abilities. Psychology and Aging, 19, 243–249.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, M. C., Berry, J. M., & Freeman, S. P. (2014). Are vocabulary tests measurement invariant between age groups? An item response analysis of three popular tests. Psychology and Aging, 29, 925–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, M. C., & Mitchum, A. L. (2013). A knowledge-based theory of rising scores on “culture free“ tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 979–1000.Google Scholar
Ghisletta, P., McArdle, J. J., & Lindenberger, U. (2006). Longitudinal cognition-survival relations in old and very old age: 13-year data from the Berlin Aging Study. European Psychologist, 11, 204–223.Google Scholar
Hall, C. B., Lipton, R. B., Sliwinski, M., & Stewart, W. F. (2000). A change point model for estimating the onset of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1555–1566.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrick, D. Z., Meinz, E. J., & Salthouse, T. A. (1999). Predictors of crossword puzzle proficiency and moderators of age-cognition relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 131–164.Google Scholar
Harris, S. E., Fox, H., Wright, A. F., Hayward, C., Starr, J. M., Whalley, L. J., Deary, I. J. (2006). The brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism is associated with age-related change in reasoning skills. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 505–513.Google Scholar
Hershey, D. A., Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Walsh, D. A. (2003). Influences of age and training on script development. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 10, 1–19.Google Scholar
Hertzog, C. (1989). The influence of cognitive slowing on age differences in intelligence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 636–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzog, C. (2008). Theoretical approaches to the study of cognitive aging: An individual-differences perspective. In Hofer, S. M. & Alwin, D. F. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive aging: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 34–49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hertzog, C. (2009). Use it or lose it: An old hypothesis, new evidence, and an ongoing controversy. In Bosworth, H. & Hertzog, C. (Eds.), Cognition and aging: Research methodologies and empirical advances (pp. 161–179). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hertzog, C., & Bleckley, M. K. (2001). Age differences in the structure of intelligence: Influences of information processing speed. Intelligence, 29, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., Hultsch, D. F., & MacDonald, S. W. S. (2003). Latent change models of adult cognition: Are changes in processing speed and working memory associated with changes in episodic memory? Psychology and Aging, 18, 755–769.Google Scholar
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65.Google Scholar
Hertzog, C., & Schaie, K. W. (1986). Stability and change in adult intelligence: 1. Analysis of longitudinal covariance structures. Psychology and Aging, 1, 159–171.Google Scholar
Hofer, S. M., Flaherty, B. P., & Hoffman, L. (2006). Cross-sectional analysis of time-dependent data: Mean-induced association in age-heterogeneous samples and an alternative method based on sequential narrow age-cohort samples. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 165–187.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1985). Remodeling old models of intelligence: Gf–Gc theory. In Wolman, B. B. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267–300). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107–129.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., Donaldson, G., & Engstrom, R. (1981). Apprehension, memory, and fluid intelligence decline in adulthood. Research on Aging, 3, 33–84.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Hofer, S. M. (1992). Major abilities and development in the adult period. In Sternberg, R. J. & Berg, C. A. (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 44–99). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hultsch, D. F., Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Small, B. J. (1998). Memory change in the aged. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hultsch, D. F., Small, B. J., Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R. A. (1999). Use it or lose it: Engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging. Psychology and Aging, 14, 245–263.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 637–671.Google Scholar
Kramer, A. F., & Colcombe, S. (2018). Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic study – revisited. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 213–217.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., & Chrystal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar
Lane, C. J., & Zelinski, E. M. (2003). Longitudinal hierarchical linear models of the Memory Functioning Questionnaire. Psychology and Aging, 18, 38–53.Google Scholar
Laukka, E. J., MacDonald, S. M. S., & and Bäckman, L. (2008). Terminal-decline effects for select cognitive tasks after controlling for preclinical dementia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindenberger, U., Nagel, I. E., Chicherio, C., Li, S-C., Heekeren, H. R., & Bäckman, L. (2008). Age-related decline in brain resources modulates genetic effects on cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 234–244.Google Scholar
Lindenberger, U., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., & Hertzog, C. (2011). Cross-sectional age variance extraction: What’s change got to do with it? Psychology and Aging, 26, 34–47.Google Scholar
Lövdén, M., Rönnlund, M., Wahlin, A., Bäckman, L., Nyberg, L., & Goran-Nilsson, L. (2004). The extent of stability and change in episodic and semantic memory in old age: Demographic predictors of stability and change. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59B, P130–P134.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, A., Christensen, H., Hofer, S. M., Korten, A. E., & Jorm, A. F. (2003). Use it and still lose it? The association between activity and cognitive performance established using latent growth techniques in a community sample. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masunaga, H., & Horn, J. L. (2001). Expertise and age-related changes in components of intelligence. Psychology and Aging, 16, 293–311.Google Scholar
McArdle, J. J., & Bell, R. Q. (2001). An introduction to latent growth models for developmental data analysis. In Little, T. D. & Schabel, K. U. (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multi-level data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 69–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38, 115–142.Google Scholar
Meredith, W., & Horn, J. L. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In Collins, L. M. & Sayer, A. G. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203–240). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392–423.Google Scholar
Nilsson, L-G., Sternäng, O., Rönnlund, M., & Nyberg, L. (2009). Challenging the notion of an early onset of cognitive decline. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 521–524.Google Scholar
Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Leventhal, H., Morrell, R. W., Leventhal, E., Birchmore, D., et al. (1999). Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Older is wiser. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47, 172–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Lautenschlager, G., Earles, J. L., Frieske, D., Zwahr, M., &Gaines, C. L. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 621–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., & Martin, M. (2008). Adult aging and prospective memory: The importance of ecological validity. In Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 161–185). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Pietschnig, J., & Voracek, M. (2015). One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909–2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 282–315.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. (1993). Does it all go together when it goes? The nineteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 385–434.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P., Diggle, P., Holland, F., & McInnes, L. (2004). Practice and drop-out effects during a 17-year longitudinal study of cognitive aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59B, P84–P97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ram, N., Gerstorf, D., Fauth, E., Zarit, S., & Malmberg, B. (2010). Aging, disablement, and dying: Using time-as-process and time-as-resources metrics to chart late-life change. Research on Human Development, 7, 27–44.Google Scholar
Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48.Google Scholar
Raz, N., Lindenberger, U., Ghisletta, P., Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K. M., & Acker, J. M. (2008). Neuroanatomical correlates of fluid intelligence in healthy adults and persons with vascular risk factors. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 718–726.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. A. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on cognitive change. In Hofer, S. M. & Alwin, D. F. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive aging: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 557–574). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rönnlund, M., & Nilsson, L-G. (2008). The magnitude, generality, and determinants of Flynn effects on forms of declarative memory and visuospatial ability: Time-sequential analyses of data from a Swedish cohort study. Intelligence, 36, 192–209.Google Scholar
Rönnlund, M., Nyberg, L., Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L-G. (2005). Stability, growth, and decline in adult life span development of declarative memory: Data from a population-based study. Psychology and Aging, 20, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, T. A. (1982). Adult cognition: An experimental psychology of human aging. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2006). Mental exercise and mental aging: Evaluating the validity of the “use it or lose it” hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 68–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 507–514.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A., Pink, J. E., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2008). Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 36, 464–486.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1977). Quasi-experimental designs in the psychology of aging. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 39–58). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1989). Perceptual speed in adulthood: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Psychology and Aging, 4, 443–453.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (2009). “When does age-related cognitive decline begin?”: Salthouse again reifies the “cross-sectional fallacy.” Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 528–529.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (2012). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W., Maitland, S. B., Willis, S. L, & Intrieri, R. C. (1998). Longitudinal invariance of adult psychometric ability factor structures across 7 years. Psychology and Aging, 13, 8–20.Google Scholar
Schooler, C., Mulatu, M. S., & Oates, G. (1999). The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychology and Aging, 14, 483–506.Google Scholar
Shadish, W., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Singer, T., Verhaeghen, P., Ghisletta, P., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2003). The fate of cognition in very old age: Six-year longitudinal findings in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). Psychology and Aging, 18, 318–331.Google Scholar
Sliwinski, M., & Buschke, H. (2004). Modeling intraindividual cognitive change in aging adults: Results from the Einstein Aging Studies. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 11, 196–211.Google Scholar
Sliwinski, M. J., Hofer, S. M., Hall, C., Bushke, H., & Lipton, R. B. (2003). Modeling memory decline in older adults: The importance of preclinical dementia, attrition and chronological age. Psychology and Aging, 18, 658–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sliwinski, M. J., Hoffman, L., & Hofer, S. M. (2010). Evaluating convergence of within-person change and between-person differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies. Research on Human Development, 7, 45–60.Google Scholar
Spiro, A. III, & Brady, C. B. (2008).Integrating health into cognitive aging research and theory: Quo vadis? In, S. M. Hofer & Alwin, D. F. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive aging: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 260–283). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stine-Morrow, A. L., Parisi, J. M., Morrow, D. G., Greene, J., & Park, D. C. (2007). The senior odyssey project: A model of intellectual and social engagement. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B, P62–P69.Google Scholar
Thorvaldsson, V., Hofer, S. M., Berg, S., Skoog, I., Sacuiu, S., & Johansson, B. (2008). Onset of terminal decline in cognitive abilities in individuals without dementia. Neurology, 71, 882–887.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tranter, L. J., & Koutstaal, W. (2008). Age and flexible thinking: An experimental demonstration of the beneficial effects of increased cognitively stimulating activity on fluid intelligence in healthy older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15, 184–207.Google Scholar
Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2011). Global and domain-specific changes in cognition throughout adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 47, 331–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P., & Salthouse, T. A.(1997). Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and non-linear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1939). Measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S., Beck, T. L., Bienias, J. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2007). Terminal cognitive decline: Accelerated loss of cognition in the last years of life. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 131–137.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., Bienias, J. L., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Morris, M. C., & Evans, D. A. (2003). Cognitive activity and cognitive decline in a biracial community population. Neurology, 61, 812–816.Google Scholar
Zelinski, E. M., & Kennison, R. F. (2007). Not your father’s test scores: Cohort reduces psychometric aging effects. Psychology and Aging, 22, 546–557.Google Scholar
Zelinski, E. M., Kennison, R. F., Watts, A., & Lewis, K. L. (2009). Convergence between cross-sectional and longitudinal studies: Cohort matters. In Bosworth, H. B. & Hertzog, C. (Eds.), Aging and cognition: Research methodologies and empirical advances (pp. 101–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×