Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 General Introduction – Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe:
- 2 The Patent System in Pre-1989 Czechoslovakia
- 3 The Development of Hungarian Copyright Law until the Creation of the First Copyright Act (1793–1884)
- 4 Moral Rights and the Cultural Aspects of Hungarian Copyright Law:
- 5 The Polish Struggle with the Concept of Copyrightable Work:
- 6 Comparing Concepts of Originality in EU, Lithuanian, and US Law:
- 7 The Comparative Lessons of Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier
- 8 Communication to the Public under Union Law from the Perspective of Austrian and German Copyright Law: A Notion in Transition
- 9 Collective Management of Copyright in Hungary1
- 10 Exceptions and Limitations:
- 11 The Digitization of Czech Cultural Heritage and New Forms of Information Exclusivity
- 12 The Treatment of Authors’ Moral Rights in Georgia
- 13 Performers’ Rights: A Central European Export
- 14 The White Elephant in the Room:
- 15 A Central and Eastern European Perspective on EU Copyright Reform:
- 16 The Painter, the One Horn Cow, and Ole Hank Wilson’s Back Lot:
- 17 Does Paying Innovative Employees Pay Off?:
- 18 Intellectual Property Rights in Albania:
- 19 The Protection of Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products in the European Union
- 20 Legal Protection of the Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions of the Indigenous Peoples of the Former Soviet Union*
- Index
7 - The Comparative Lessons of Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2019
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 General Introduction – Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe:
- 2 The Patent System in Pre-1989 Czechoslovakia
- 3 The Development of Hungarian Copyright Law until the Creation of the First Copyright Act (1793–1884)
- 4 Moral Rights and the Cultural Aspects of Hungarian Copyright Law:
- 5 The Polish Struggle with the Concept of Copyrightable Work:
- 6 Comparing Concepts of Originality in EU, Lithuanian, and US Law:
- 7 The Comparative Lessons of Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier
- 8 Communication to the Public under Union Law from the Perspective of Austrian and German Copyright Law: A Notion in Transition
- 9 Collective Management of Copyright in Hungary1
- 10 Exceptions and Limitations:
- 11 The Digitization of Czech Cultural Heritage and New Forms of Information Exclusivity
- 12 The Treatment of Authors’ Moral Rights in Georgia
- 13 Performers’ Rights: A Central European Export
- 14 The White Elephant in the Room:
- 15 A Central and Eastern European Perspective on EU Copyright Reform:
- 16 The Painter, the One Horn Cow, and Ole Hank Wilson’s Back Lot:
- 17 Does Paying Innovative Employees Pay Off?:
- 18 Intellectual Property Rights in Albania:
- 19 The Protection of Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products in the European Union
- 20 Legal Protection of the Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions of the Indigenous Peoples of the Former Soviet Union*
- Index
Summary
For a large part of the past century, the cold war between the Soviet Union and the United States and Russia’s continued refusal to join the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention), the predominant international copyright agreement, have raised complicated questions concerning the protection of Russian authors in the United States.1 The case that has received considerable attention in intellectual property literature is Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc (Itar-Tass).2 Filed in the mid-1990s, shortly after Russia’s accession to the Berne Convention but before its admission to the World Trade Organization (WTO), this case covered not only choice-of-law questions in the intellectual property field but also the interrelationship between domestic law and international treaties. Less frequently explored, however, are the rich comparative lessons that the case has provided on the development of intellectual property law and policy in Central and Eastern Europe.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019