Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:31:21.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Infant Word Learning and Emerging Syntax

from Part V - Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2020

By
Dani Levine ,
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek  and
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Edited by
Jeffrey J. Lockman  and
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda
Jeffrey J. Lockman
Affiliation:
Tulane University, Louisiana
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

For centuries philosophers and scientists have puzzled over the meaning of words and the intricacies of grammar. How did the human species develop such a complex system that allowed us to work collaboratively and to share experiences – be it about the past or future? How did the species derive a system that allowed for optimal representation of the world in a way that also optimized quick communication among members of the species? Our language can mend conflicts, share grand ideas, and allow us to express and grow our everyday thoughts.

Keywords

Language developmentword learningsyntactic developmentinfant-directed speechsemantic bootstrappingsyntactic bootstrappingsyntaxphonologysemanticsprosodybrain development and languageSES and language developmentbilingual language development
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development
Brain, Behavior, and Cultural Context
 , pp. 632 - 660
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., & Deckner, D. F. (2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75(4), 1171–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Deckner, D. F., & Nelson, P. B. (2014). From interactions to conversations: The development of joint engagement during early childhood. Child Development, 85(3), 941–955.Google Scholar
Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 339–356.Google Scholar
Akhtar, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). Joint attention and vocabulary development: A critical look. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 195–207.Google Scholar
Aravind, A., de Villiers, J., Pace, A., Valentine, H., Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., … Wilson, M. S. (2018). Fast mapping word meanings across trials: Young children forget all but their first guess. Cognition, 177, 177–188.Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N. (2017). Statistical learning: A powerful mechanism that operates by mere exposure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8, 1–7.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In Moore C, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507–584.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–218). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., … Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1–26.Google Scholar
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253–3258.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (2000). The intentionality model of word learning: How to learn a word, any word. In Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (Eds.), Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition (pp. 19–50). Oxford.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2002). Mindreading, communication and the learning of names for things. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 37–54.Google Scholar
Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S. R. (2008). Taking stock as theories of word learning take shape. Developmental Science, 11(2), 185–194.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Tal, J., Rahn, C., Galperin, C. Z., Pecheux, M. G., Lamour, M., … Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (1992). Functional analysis of the contents of maternal speech to infants of 5 and 13 months in four cultures: Argentina, France, Japan, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 593–603.Google Scholar
Borovsky, A., Ellis, E. M., Evans, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (2016). Lexical leverage: Category knowledge boosts real-time novel word recognition in 2-year-olds. Developmental Science, 19(6), 918–932.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burns, T. C., Yoshida, K. A., Hill, K., & Werker, J. F. (2007). The development of phonetic representation in bilingual and monolingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 455–474.Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: Infants’ language experience influences the development of a word-learning heuristic. Developmental Science, 12(5), 815–823.Google Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction-based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–174.Google Scholar
Cartmill, E. A., Armstrong, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 11278–11283.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Diego-Balaguer, R., Martinez-Alvarez, A., & Pons, F. (2016). Temporal attention as a scaffold for language development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 44.Google Scholar
D’souza, D., D’souza, H., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2017). Precursors to language development in typically and atypically developing infants and toddlers: The importance of embracing complexity. Journal of Child Language, 44(3), 591–627.Google Scholar
Elman, J. (2003). Development: It’s about time. Developmental Science, 6(4), 430–433.Google Scholar
Falk, S., & Kello, C. T. (2017). Hierarchical organization in the temporal structure of infant-direct speech and song. Cognition, 163, 80–86.Google Scholar
Ferguson, B., Graf, E., & Waxman, S. R. (2018). When veps cry: Two-year-olds efficiently learn novel words from linguistic contexts alone. Language Learning and Development, 14(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Ferguson, B., & Lew-Williams, C. (2016). Communicative signals support abstract rule learning by 7-month-old infants. Scientific Reports, 6, 25434.Google Scholar
Ferguson, B., & Waxman, S. R. (2016). What the [beep]? Six-month-olds link novel communicative signals to meaning. Cognition, 146, 185–189.Google Scholar
Ferjan Ramírez, N., Ramírez, R. R., Clarke, M., Taulu, S., & Kuhl, P. K. (2017). Speech discrimination in 11-month-old bilingual and monolingual infants: A magnetoencephalography study. Developmental Science, 20, e12427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16(2), 234–248.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 64(3), 637–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferry, A. L., Hespos, S. J., & Waxman, S. R. (2013). Nonhuman primate vocalizations support categorization in very young human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(38), 15231–15235.Google Scholar
Garcia-Sierra, A., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Percaccio, C. R., Conboy, B. T., Romo, H., Klarman, L., … Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Bilingual language learning: An ERP study relating early brain responses to speech, language input, and later word production. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, 3, 215–256.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. (2006). Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition, 98(3), B67–B74.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. (2010). Infants use rational decision criteria for choosing among models of their input. Cognition, 115(2), 362–366.Google Scholar
Gerken, L., Jusczyk, P. W., & Mandel, D. R. (1994). When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds’ sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases. Cognition, 51(3), 237–265.Google Scholar
Gerken, L., Landau, B., & Remez, R. E. (1990). Function morphemes in young children’s speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 204–216.Google Scholar
Gervain, J., Berent, I., & Werker, J. F. (2012). Binding at birth: The newborn brain detects identity relations and sequential position in speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(3), 564–574.Google Scholar
Gervain, J., Macagno, F., Cogoi, S., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2008). The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(37), 14222–14227.Google Scholar
Gervain, J., & Werker, J. F. (2013). Learning non-adjacent regularities at age 0;7. Journal of Child Language, 40(4), 860–872.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1(1), 23–64.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: The state of the art. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 3–48). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Can, D. D., Soderstrom, M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2015). (Baby) talk to me: The social context of infant-directed speech and its effects on early language acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 339–344.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger, N. R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 99–108.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. Gordon, L. & Cauley, K. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and word order comprehension in a new context. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23–45.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hoff, E., Rowe, M., Tamis-LeMonda, C., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2019). Language matters: Denying the existence of the 30-million-word gap has serious consequences. Child Development, 90(3), 985–992.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Mervis, C. B., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1994). Early object labels: The case for a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 125–155.Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K., & Bowen, S. (2013). Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: Effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 405–417.Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K., & Hurley, K. (2013). Infant-directed prosody helps infants map sounds to meanings. Infancy, 18(5), 797–824.Google Scholar
Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition, 87(1), B23–B34.Google Scholar
Harris, J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Lessons from the crib for the classroom: How children really learn vocabulary. Handbook of Early Literacy Research, 3, 49–65.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hartman, K. M., Ratner, N. B., & Newman, R. S. (2017). Infant-directed speech (IDS) vowel clarity and child language outcomes. Journal of Child Language, 44(5), 1140–1162.Google Scholar
Hassinger-Das, B., Bustamante, A. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2018). Learning landscapes: Playing the way to learning and engagement in public spaces. Education Sciences, 8(2), 74.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, K., & Gerken, L. (2014). From pauses to clauses: Prosody facilitates learning of syntactic constituency. Cognition, 133(2), 420–428.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2000). Beyond Shipley, Smith, and Gleitman: Young children’s comprehension of bound morphemes. In Landau, B., Sabini, J. Jonides, J. & Newport, E. L. (Eds.), Perception, cognition and language: Essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman (pp. 191–201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Owen, M. T., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A., … Suma, K. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children’s language success. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1071–1083.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Cassidy, K. W., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26(3), 269–286.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., & Ribot, K. M. (2017). Language growth in English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children from 2.5 to 5 years. Journal of Pediatrics, 190, 241–245.Google Scholar
Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Brand, R. J., Brown, E., Chung, H. L., … Bloom, L. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–135.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children. Child Development, 79(4), 979–1000.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. E., de Villiers, J. G., & Seymour, H. N. (2005). Agreement without understanding? The case of third person singular/s. First Language, 25(3), 317–330.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159–207.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 630–645.Google Scholar
Kalashnikova, M., Goswami, U., & Burnham, D. (2018). Mothers speak differently to infants at-risk for dyslexia. Developmental Science, 21(1), e12487.Google Scholar
Kemler Nelson, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Jusczyk, P., & Cassidy, K. W. (1989). How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning. Journal of Child Language, 16, 55–68.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10(1), 110–120.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., … Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–686.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M., & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101.Google Scholar
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3(3), 299–321.Google Scholar
Little, E. E., Carver, L. J., & Legare, C. H. (2016). Cultural variation in triadic infant–caregiver object exploration. Child Development, 87(4), 1130–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Sak, K. (2001). One cow does not an animal make: Young children can extend novel words at the superordinate level. Child Development, 72(6), 1674–1694.Google Scholar
Luo, R., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2016). Mothers’ verbal and nonverbal strategies in relation to infants’ object-directed actions in real time and across the first three years in ethnically diverse families. Infancy, 21(1), 65–89.Google Scholar
Lytle, S. R., Garcia-Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2018). Two are better than one: Infant language learning from video improves in the presence of peers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9859–9866.Google Scholar
Ma, W., Golinkoff, R. M., Houston, D. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Word learning in infant-and adult-directed speech. Language Learning and Development, 7(3), 185–201.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, H., Curtin, S., & Graham, S. A. (2012). Class matters: 12-month-olds’ word–object associations privilege content over function words. Developmental Science, 15(6), 753–761.Google Scholar
Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). A unified theory of word learning: Putting verb acquisition in context. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, D. R., Jusczyk, P. W., & Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1994). Does sentential prosody help infants organize and remember speech information? Cognition, 53(2), 155–180.Google Scholar
Mandel, D. R., Kemler Nelson, D. G., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1996). Infants remember the order of words in a spoken sentence. Cognitive Development, 11(2), 181–196.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Fernandes, K. J., & Johnson, S. P. (2007). Infant rule learning facilitated by speech. Psychological Science, 18(5), 387–391.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21(2), 339–366.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A., Igarashi, Y., Jincho, N., & Mazuka, R. (2016). Utterances in infant-directed speech are shorter, not slower. Cognition, 156, 52–59.Google Scholar
Mastin, J. D., & Vogt, P. (2016). Infant engagement and early vocabulary development: a naturalistic observation study of Mozambican infants from 1; 1 to 2; 1. Journal of Child Language, 43(2), 235–264.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121–136.Google Scholar
Mattock, K., Polka, L., Rvachew, S., & Krehm, M. (2010). The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: Comparing monolingual and bilingual infants. Developmental Science, 13(1), 229–243.Google Scholar
McCabe, A., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., Cates, C. B., Golinkoff, R., Guerra, A. W., … Mendelsohn, A. (2013). Multilingual children. Social Policy Report, 27(4), 2014–2451.Google Scholar
McGillion, M., Pine, J. M., Herbert, J. S., & Matthews, D. (2017). A randomised controlled trial to test the effect of promoting caregiver contingent talk on language development in infants from diverse socioeconomic status backgrounds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1122–1131.Google Scholar
Medina, T. N., Snedeker, J., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2011). How words can and cannot be learned by observation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(22), 9014–9019.Google Scholar
Merriman, W. E., Bowman, L. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children’s word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–129.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1990). The place of language in a scientific psychology. Psychological Science, 1(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90(1), 91–117.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H. (2013). The segmentation of sub-lexical morphemes in English-learning 15-month-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 24.Google Scholar
Molfese, D. L., & Molfese, V. J. (1979). Hemisphere and stimulus differences as reflected in the cortical responses of newborn infants to speech stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 15(5), 505–511.Google Scholar
Morales, M., Mundy, P., Delgado, C. E., Yale, M., Messinger, D., Neal, R., & Schwartz, H. K. (2000). Responding to joint attention across the 6- through 24-month age period and early language acquisition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 283–298.Google Scholar
Morales, M., Mundy, P., & Rojas, J. (1998). Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 373–377.Google Scholar
Mundy, P., Block, J., Delgado, C., Pomares, Y., van Hecke, A. V., & Parlade, M. V. (2007). Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child Development, 78(3), 938–954.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 357–374.Google Scholar
Newman, R., Ratner, N. B., Jusczyk, A. M., Jusczyk, P. W., & Dow, K. A. (2006). Infants’ early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: A retrospective analysis. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 643–655.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., Landau, B., Seydell-Greenwald, A., Turkeltaub, P. E., Chambers, C. E., Dromerick, A. W., … Gaillard, W. D. (2017). Revisiting Lenneberg’s hypotheses about early developmental plasticity: Language organization after left-hemisphere perinatal stroke. Biolinguistics, 11, 407–421.Google Scholar
Pace, A., Alper, R., Burchinal, M. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2019). Measuring success: Within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 112–125.Google Scholar
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2017). Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 285–308.Google Scholar
Pae, S., Yoon, H., Seol, A., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Ma, L., & Topping, K. (2016). Effects of feedback on parent–child language with infants and toddlers in Korea. First Language, 36(6), 549–569.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(3), 213–237.Google Scholar
Parise, E., & Csibra, G. (2012). Electrophysiological evidence for the understanding of maternal speech by 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 23(7), 728–733.Google Scholar
Peña, M., Maki, A., Kovac̆ić, D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Koizumi, H., Bouquet, F., & Mehler, J. (2003). Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(20), 11702–11705.Google Scholar
Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Awander, A., Spada, D., Baldoli, C., … Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 16056–16061.Google Scholar
Pereira, A. F., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2014). A bottom-up view of toddler word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 178–185.Google Scholar
Perry, L. K., & Samuelson, L. K. (2011). The shape of the vocabulary predicts the shape of the bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 345.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1987). The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 399–441). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2016). Effects and noneffects of input in bilingual environments on dual language skills in 2 ½-year-olds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 1023–1041.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reed, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2016). Meeting children where they are: Adaptive contingency builds early communication skills. In Witt, P. L. (Ed.) Communication and learning (Handbooks of Communication Science, pp. 601–628). Berlin: deGruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Reed, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. (2017). Learning on hold: Cell phones sidetrack parent–child interactions. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1428–1436.Google Scholar
Richman, A. L., Miller, P. M., & LeVine, R. A. (1992). Cultural and educational variations in maternal responsiveness. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 614–621.Google Scholar
Ridge, K. E., Weisberg, D. S., Ilgaz, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K. A., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2015). Supermarket speak: Increasing talk among low-socioeconomic status families. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(3), 127–135.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, K. J., Wrede, B., Vollmer, A. L., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2016). An alternative to mapping a word onto a concept in language acquisition: Pragmatic frames. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 470.Google Scholar
Romeo, R. R., Leonard, J. A., Robinson, S. T., West, M. R., Mackey, A. P., Rowe, M. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2018). Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Psychological Science, 29(5), 700–710.Google Scholar
Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R.M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85(3), 956–970.Google Scholar
Roseberry, S., Richie, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Shipley, T. F. (2011). Babies catch a break: 7- to 9-month-olds track statistical probabilities in continuous dynamic events. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1422–1424.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2018). Infant statistical learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 181–208.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2007). Domain-general learning capacities. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 68–86). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., & Wilson, D. P. (2003). From syllables to syntax: Multilevel statistical learning by 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 4(2), 273–284.Google Scholar
Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69(2), 105–134.Google Scholar
Scaff, C., Stieglitz, J., Casillas, M., & Cristia, A. (2019, March). Language input in a small-scale society: Estimations from daylong recordings in a Tsimané village. Poster presented at the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution Inaugural Workshop, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. & Ochs, E. (1983). A cultural perspective on the transition from prelinguistic to linguistic communication. In Golinkoff, R. M. (Ed.), The transition from prelinguistic to linguistic communication (pp. 115–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Scott, R. M., & Fisher, C. (2012). 2.5-year-olds use cross-situational consistency to learn verbs under referential uncertainty. Cognition, 122(2), 163–180.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & Elman, J. L. (1999). Do infants learn grammar with algebra or statistics?. Science, 284(5413), 433–433.Google Scholar
Seidl, A. (2007). Infants’ use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 24–48.Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1–38.Google Scholar
Shi, R., & Werker, J. F. (2001). Six-month-old infants’ preference for lexical words. Psychological Science, 12(1), 70–75.Google Scholar
Shipley, E. F., Smith, C. S., & Gleitman, L. R. (1969). A study in the acquisition of language: Free responses to commands. Language, 45, 322–342.Google Scholar
Shneidman, L. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Language input and acquisition in a Mayan village: How important is directed speech?. Developmental Science, 15(5), 659–673.Google Scholar
Singh, L., Fu, C. S., Tay, Z. W., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2018). Novel word learning in bilingual and monolingual infants: Evidence for a bilingual advantage. Child Development, 89(3), e183–e198.Google Scholar
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & Best, C. T. (2002). Infants’ listening preferences: Baby talk or happy talk?. Infancy, 3(3), 365–394.Google Scholar
Smith, N. A., & Trainor, L. J. (2008). Infant-directed speech is modulated by infant feedback. Infancy, 13(4), 410–420.Google Scholar
Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558–1568.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M. (2008). Early perception–late comprehension of grammar? The case of verbal-s: a response to de Villiers & Johnson (2007). Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 671–676.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Kemler Nelson, D. G., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 249–267.Google Scholar
Sperry, D. E., Sperry, L. L., & Miller, P. J. (2018). Reexamining the verbal environments of children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Child Development, 90(4), 1303–1318.Google Scholar
Stahl, A. E., Romberg, A. R., Roseberry, S., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2014). Infants segment continuous events using transitional probabilities. Child Development, 85(5), 1821–1826.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. S., Gleitman, L. R., Trueswell, J. C., & Yang, C. (2017). The pursuit of word meanings. Cognitive Science, 41(4), 638–676.Google Scholar
Suskind, D. L., Leffel, K. R., Graf, E., Hernandez, M. W., Gunderson, E. A., Sapolich, S. G., … & Levine, S. C. (2016). A parent-directed language intervention for children of low socioeconomic status: A randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Child Language, 43(2), 366–406.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Custode, S., Kuchirko, Y., Escobar, K., & Lo, T. (2019). Routine language: Speech directed to infants during home activities. Child Development, 90(6), 2135–2152.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Kuchirko, Y., & Song, L. (2014). Why is infant language learning facilitated by parental responsiveness?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 121–126.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Kuchirko, Y., & Tafuro, L. (2013). From action to interaction: Infant object exploration and mothers’ contingent responsiveness. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 202–209.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Song, L., Leavell, A. S., Kahana-Kalman, R., & Yoshikawa, H. (2012). Ethnic differences in mother–infant language and gestural communications are associated with specific skills in infants. Developmental Science, 15(3), 384–397.Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Shatz, M., & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children’s use of nouns versus verbs: A comparison of English, Italian, and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 24(3), 535–565.Google Scholar
Teinonen, T., Fellman, V., Näätänen, R., Alku, P., & Huotilainen, M. (2009). Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials. BMC Neuroscience, 10(1), 21.Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 53–71.Google Scholar
Tincoff, R., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2012). Six-month-olds comprehend words that refer to parts of the body. Infancy, 17(4), 432–444.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). The social bases of language acquisition. Social Development, 1(1), 67–87.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Lin, Y., Armstrong, B., III, Cartmill, E. A., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Gleitman, L. R. (2016). Perceiving referential intent: Dynamics of reference in natural parent–child interactions. Cognition, 148, 117–135.Google Scholar
Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75(4), 1067–1084.Google Scholar
Tucker, M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1993). Systems and language: Implications for acquisition. In Smith, L. & Thelen, E. (Eds.) Dynamical systems approach to development (pp. 359–384). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2010). Linking infants’ distributional learning abilities to natural language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 197–209.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., & Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Emergence of syntax: Commonalities and differences across children. Developmental Science, 11(1), 84–97.Google Scholar
Vouloumanos, A., Martin, A., & Onishi, K. H. (2014). Do 6-month-olds understand that speech can communicate?. Developmental Science, 17(6), 872–879.Google Scholar
Wake, M., Tobin, S., Girolametto, L., Ukoumunne, O. C., Gold, L., Levickis, P., … Reilly, S. (2011). Outcomes of population based language promotion for slow to talk toddlers at ages 2 and 3 years: Let’s Learn Language cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 343, d4741.Google Scholar
Waxman, S., Fu, X., Arunachalam, S., Leddon, E., Geraghty, K., & Song, H. J. (2013). Are nouns learned before verbs? Infants provide insight into a long-standing debate. Child Development Perspectives, 7(3), 155–159.Google Scholar
Weber, A., Fernald, A., & Diop, Y. (2017). When cultural norms discourage talking to babies: effectiveness of a parenting program in rural Senegal. Child Development, 88(5), 1513–1526.Google Scholar
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1289–1309.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 519–527.Google Scholar
Wu, Z., & Gros-Louis, J. (2014). Infants’ prelinguistic communicative acts and maternal responses: Relations to linguistic development. First Language, 34(1), 72–90.Google Scholar
Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114(2), 245–272.Google Scholar
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2012a). Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 125(2), 244–262.Google Scholar
Yu, C., (2012b). Modeling cross-situational word-referent learning: Prior questions. Psychological Review, 119(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
Yu, C., (2016). The social origins of sustained attention in one-year-old human infants. Current Biology, 26(9), 1235–1240.Google Scholar
Yu, C., Suanda, S. H., & Smith, L. B. (2019) Infant sustained attention but not joint attention to objects at 9 months predicts vocabulary at 12 and 15 months. Developmental Science, 22(1), e12735.Google Scholar
Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development, 83(4), 1382–1399.Google Scholar
Yurovsky, D., & Frank, M. C. (2017). Beyond naïve cue combination: Salience and social cues in early word learning. Developmental Science, 20(2), e12349.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×