Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Introduction
- 6 The Impact of Implicit Racial Bias in Racial Health Disparities: A Practical Problem with Theoretical Implications
- 7 Revisiting the Measurement of Group Schemas in Political Science
- 8 Implicit Bias and Discrimination: Evidence on Causality
- 9 What Is the Unique Contribution of Implicit Measures in Predicting Political Choices?
- 10 Predicting Biased Voting Behavior with Implicit Attitude Measures: Results from a Voting Experiment and the 2008 Presidential Election
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
Introduction
from Section II - Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Introduction
- 6 The Impact of Implicit Racial Bias in Racial Health Disparities: A Practical Problem with Theoretical Implications
- 7 Revisiting the Measurement of Group Schemas in Political Science
- 8 Implicit Bias and Discrimination: Evidence on Causality
- 9 What Is the Unique Contribution of Implicit Measures in Predicting Political Choices?
- 10 Predicting Biased Voting Behavior with Implicit Attitude Measures: Results from a Voting Experiment and the 2008 Presidential Election
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
Summary
Despite twenty years of research, we have not yet reached a point of consensus about what might be considered the most important issue in the study of implicit bias: when and how strongly does it shape cognition and behavior? This section of this handbook reviews some of the relevant literature.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 171 - 172Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Cooper, L. A., Roter, D. L., Carson, K. A., et al. (2012). The associations of clinicians’ implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300558CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2008). When social context matters: The influence of long- term contact and short-term exposure to admired outgroup members on implicit attitudes and behavioral intentions. Social Cognition, 26(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditonto, T. M., Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (2013). AMPing racial attitudes: Comparing the power of explicit and implicit racism measures in 2008. Political Psychology, 34(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 75–109). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mann, N. H., & Kawakami, K. (2012). The long, steep path to equality: Progressing on egalitarian goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2008). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 19–63). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Orchard, J., & Price, J. (2017). County-level racial prejudice and the black-white gap in infant health outcomes. Social Science and Medicine, 181, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., et al. (2014). Attitudes toward Blacks in the Obama era: Changing distributions and impacts on job approval and electoral choice, 2008– 2012. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gonzalez, R., et al. (2016). The effects of oncologist implicit racial bias in racially discordant oncology interactions. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(24), 2874–2880. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed