Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:34:30.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section IV - Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2024

Edited by
Jon A. Krosnick ,
Tobias H. Stark  and
Amanda L. Scott
Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Tobias H. Stark
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Amanda L. Scott
Affiliation:
The Strategy Team, Columbus, Ohio
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 419 - 558
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 75–109). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2019). The IAT is dead, long live the IAT: Context-sensitive measures of implicit attitudes are indispensable to social and political psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418797309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Voss, A. (2012). Multinomial models and diffusion models. In Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., & Stahl, C. (Eds.), Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 331–354). Guilford.Google Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2008). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 19–63). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M., Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., et al. (2015). A model of moderated convergence between direct, indirect, and behavioral measures of personality traits. In Ortner, T. M. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.), Behavior Based Assessment: Going beyond Self Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains (pp. 29–44). Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Steyer, R., Geiser, C., & Fiege, C. (2012). Latent state-trait models. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., et al. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 3: Data Analysis and Research Publication. (pp. 291–308). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

References

Achen, C. (1987). Interpreting and Using Regression. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Baker, F., & Kim, S. (2004). Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. New York, NY: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P., & Satorra, A. (2000). Hierarchical regression without phantom factors. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2006a). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2006b). Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 113, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2008). Unconscious racism: A concept in pursuit of a measure. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2017). You can’t assess the forest if you can’t assess the trees: Psychometric challenges to measuring implicit bias in crowds. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2021). Listening to measurement error: Lessons from the IAT. In Krosnick, J. A., Stark, T. H., & Scott, A. L. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P. M., et al. (2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal–formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 3, 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, C. F., Wiitala, W. L., & Richard, F. D. (2003). Meta-analysis of raw mean differences. Psychological Methods, 8, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71, 425–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buttrick, N., Axt, J., Ebersole, C., et al. (2020). Re-assessing the incremental predictive validity of Implicit Association Tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88. On-line preview.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, M., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1989). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., et al. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., et al. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad-Model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L. (1976). Research on classrooms and schools: Formulation of questions, design and analysis. Occasional paper of the Stanford Evaluation Consortium. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED135801.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change”—or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L., Gleser, C., Nanda, H., et al. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., Hussey, I., & Hughes, S. (2019). The AMPeror’s new clothes: Performance on the Affect Misattribution Procedure is mainly driven by awareness of influence of the primes (online). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d5zn8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, W.A., Preacher, K.J., & Banaji, M.R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodaj, A. (2012). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing a content and response-style model of socially desirable responding. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draheim, C., Hicks, K. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016). Combining reaction time and accuracy: The relationship between working memory capacity and task switching as a case example. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11(1), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draheim, C., Mashburn, C., Martin, J., et al. (2019). Reaction time in differential and developmental research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives.Psychological Bulletin, 145, 508–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, S., & Stark, S. (2010). 75 years after Likert: Thurstone was right. Industrial and Organziational Psychology, 3, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., et al. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firebaugh, G. (1978). A rule for inferring individual-level relationships from aggregate data. American Sociological Review, 43, 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. A., Fisher, J. D., & Shuper, P. (2014). Social psychology and the fight against AIDS: An information-motivation-behavioral skills model for the prediction and promotion of health behavior change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 105–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., et al. (2011). The speed–accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: A structural model-based approach. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17242–17249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlow, C.F., & Beretvas, N. (2005). Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. Psychological Methods, 10, 227–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Park, D., Shor, B., et al. (2008). Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan, A. E., et al. (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist, 72, 861–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D., & Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., et al. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayduk, L. (2014a). Seeing perfectly fitting factor models that are causally misspecified: Understanding that close-fitting models can be worse. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayduk, L. (2014b). Shame for disrespecting evidence: The personal consequences of insufficient respect for structural equation model testing. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(124).Google Scholar
Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed–accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 150–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaccard, J., & Bo, A. (2020). Making outcome measures more useful in clinical trials: Addressing the problem of arbitrary metrics. Under editorial review.Google Scholar
Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2020). Theory Construction and Model Building Skills: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jaccard, J., & Levitz, N. (2015). Parent-based interventions to reduce adolescent problem behaviors: New directions for self-regulation approaches. In Oettingen, G. & Gollwitzer, P. (Eds.), Self-regulation in Adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. & Wan, C. (1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.Google ScholarPubMed
Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (2006). A paradigm for studying the accuracy of self-reports of risk behavior relevant to AIDS: Empirical perspectives on stability, recall bias, and transitory influences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1559–1816.Google Scholar
Jost, J., Rudman, L., Blair, I, et al. (2009). The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., & Ferree, G. (1981). Standardization in causal analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 10, 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A. E., Axt, J. R., et al. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Mental chronometry and individual differences: Modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 819–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulaik, S. A. (2005). Looking back on the indeterminacy controversies in factor analysis. In A. Maydeu-Olivares, & J. McArdle, (Eds.), Contemporary Psychometrics. New York, NY: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 173–206.Google Scholar
Oswald, F.L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown importance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., et al. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, K,. & Lundberg, K. (2014). The affect misattribution procedure: Ten years of evidence on reliability, validity, and mechanisms. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 672–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, K., Niemi, L., & Doris, J. (2018). How to think about explicit bias. Scientific American (online). www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-think-about-implicit-bias/Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1992). The transtheoretical approach. In Norcross, J. C. & Goldfried, M. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2013). Factorial invariance in multiple populations: A multiple testing procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2020). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, L. A. (2008). The validity of the Implicit Association Test is a scientific certainty. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P., & Yang, H. (2000). Correction for range restriction: An expanded typology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvin, H. (1958). Durkheim’s suicide and problems of empirical research. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 607–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teige-Mocigemba, S., Becker, M., Sherman, J. et al. (2017). The affect misattribution procedure, Experimental Psychology, 64, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, R., & Tian, T. (2011). Measuring effect size: A robust heteroscedastic approach for two or more groups. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38, 1350–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolsiefer, K., Westfall, J., & Judd, C. M. (2017). Modeling stimulus variation in three common implicit attitude tasks. Behavior Research, 49, 1193–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Anderson, C. (2016). White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Arendt, F., & Northrup, T. (2015). Effects of long-term exposure to news stereotypes on implicit and explicit attitudes. International Journal of Communication, 9, 2370–2390.Google Scholar
Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In Roediger, H. L. III, Nairne, J. S., Neath, I. E., & Surprenant, A. M. (Eds.), The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 117–150.Google Scholar
Baron, A. S. (2015). Constraints on the development of implicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berard, T. J. (2008). The neglected social psychology of institutional racism. Sociology Compass, 2, 734–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00089.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V., & Brondolo, E. (2017). Moving beyond the individual: Community-level prejudice and health. Social Science & Medicine, 183, 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobo, L. D., & Charles, C. Z. (2009). Race in the American mind: From the Moynihan report to the Obama candidacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208324759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, R., & Agerström, J. (2016). A closer look at the discrimination outcomes in the IAT literature. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemen, R. T. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(89)90012-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2008). When social context matters: The influence of long-term contact and short-term exposure to admired outgroup members on implicit attitudes and behavioral intentions. Social Cognition, 26, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunham, Y., Baron, A., & Banaji, M. (2006). From American city to Japanese village: A cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child Development, 77, 1268–1281. Retrieved from: www.jstor.org/stable/3878431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2008). The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunham, Y., Chen, E. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2013). Two signatures of implicit intergroup attitudes: Developmental invariance and early enculturation. Psychological Science, 24, 860–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612463081CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., et al. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., et al. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feagin, J. R. (2006). Systemic Racism: A Theory of Oppression. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Feagin, J. R., & Feagin, C. B. (1986). Discrimination American style: Institutional Racism and Sexism. Malabar, FL: R.E. Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of change in implicit bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 522–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, G. M. (2015). Racism: A Short History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature, 75(1949), 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/075450a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., Morrison, M., Phills, C. E., et al. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216684131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Giulietti, C., Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2019). Racial discrimination in local public services: A field experiment in the United States. Journal of European Economic Association, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. R., Carney, D. R., Pallin, D. J., et al. (2007). Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decision for black and white patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., et al. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Smith, C. T., Sriram, N., et al. (2009). Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01195.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W. J., Chapman, M. V., Lee, K. M., et al. (2015). Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e60–e76. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hehman, E., Flake, J. K., & Calanchini, J. (2018). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617711229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiphetz, L., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2013). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes in children and adults: Tests in the domain of religion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 864–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hensch, M. (2016, September 26). Clinton: We must fight ‘implicit bias.’ The Hill. Retrieved from: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/297939-clinton-i-think-implicit-bias-is-a-problem-for-everyoneGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., et al. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kugelmass, H. (2016). “Sorry, I’m not accepting new patients”: An audit study of access to mental health care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 57, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146516647098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E., et al. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Expeirmental Psychology: General, 145, 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000179Google ScholarPubMed
Legewie, J., & Schaeffer, M. (2016). Contested boundaries: Explaining where ethnoracial diversity provokes neighborhood conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1086/686942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, J. B., Hehman, E., Ayduk, O., et al. (2016). Racial bias is associated with ingroup death rate for Blacks and Whites: Insights from Project Implicit. Social Science & Medicine, 170, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, J. B., Hehman, E., & Snowden, L. R. (2018). States higher in racial bias spend less on disabled Medicaid enrollees. Social Science & Medicine, 208, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., et al. (1958). A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920–1957. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 337–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, H. (2017, October 9). The false ‘science’ of implicit bias. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from: www.wsj.com/articles/the-false-science-of-implicit-bias-1507590908Google Scholar
Marini, M., Sriram, N., Schnabel, K., et al. (2013). Overweight people have low levels of implicit weight bias, but overweight nations have high levels of implicit weight bias. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083543CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278102500401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejia, J., & Parker, C. (2018). When transparency fails: Bias and financial incentives in ridesharing platforms. Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 18–59. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellers, B., Ungar, L., Baron, J., et al. (2014). Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psychological Science, 25, 1106–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1678–1712. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, C. T., Varni, S. E., Solomon, S. E., et al. (2016). Macro-level implicit HIV prejudice and the health of community residents with HIV. Health Psychology, 35, 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., et al. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordell, J. (2017, May 7). Is this how discrimination ends? The Atlantic. Retrieved from: www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/05/unconscious-bias-training/525405/Google Scholar
Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M. (2004). Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okonofua, J. A., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26, 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615570365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orchard, J., & Price, J. (2017). County-level racial prejudice and the black-white gap in infant health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 181, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032734CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, S. (2007). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Park, M. (2018, April 17). What the Starbucks incident tells us about implicit bias. CNN. Retrieved from: www.cnn.com/2018/04/17/health/implicit-bias-philadelphia-starbucks/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Felix, K., & Lee, G. (2007). Implicit attitudes toward Arab-Muslims and the moderating effects of social information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701330942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., et al. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Krosnick, J. A., Pasek, J., et al. (2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., & Lundberg, K. B. (2014). The affect misattribution procedure: Ten years of evidence on reliability, validity, and mechanisms. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, K., Niemi, L., & Doris, J. M. (2018, March 27). How to think about “implicit bias.” Scientific American. Retrieved from: www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-think-about-implicit-bias/Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L. (2018). Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 11693–11698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818816116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017a). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017b). Flipping the script on implicit bias research with the Bias of Crowds. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1380460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 609–642. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., Wesselmann, E. D., et al. (2013). The influence of social norms upon behavioral expressions of implicit and explicit weight-related stigma in an interactive game. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86, 189–201.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2007) ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century: The Johan Skytte Prize Lecture’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 134–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, J. R., Newheiser, A., & Olson, K. R. (2015). Exposure to racial out-groups and implicit race bias in the United States. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rholes, W. S., & Pryor, J. B. (1982). Cognitive accessibility and causal attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282084019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richeson, J. A., & Sommers, S. R. (2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803Google Scholar
Rooth, D. O. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics, 17, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. (2018, May 29). ‘I’m not aware of that’: Starbucks employees receive racial bias training. National Public Radio. Retrieved from: www.npr.org/2018/05/29/615263473/thousands-of-starbucks-stores-close-for-racial-bias-trainingGoogle Scholar
Rudman, L.A., Phelan, J. E., & Heppen, J. B. (2007). Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1700–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207307487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salter, P., & Adams, G. (2013). Toward a critical race psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, J., & Gampa, A. (2018). Implicit and explicit racial attitudes changed during Black Lives Matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1039–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218757454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, K., Ramiah, A. A., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., et al. (1997). Racial Attitudes in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. (2018, May 29). Starbucks’s bias training finally happened. Here’s what it looked like. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/05/29/starbucks-training-finally-happened-heres-what-it-looked-likeGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, S., Dunn, E., & Lowery, B. (2005). The relationship between parental racial attitudes and children’s implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, S., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., et al. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singal, J. (2017, January 11). Psychology’s favorite tool for measuring racism isn’t up to the job. New York Magazine. Retrieved from: www.thecut.com/2017/01/psychologys-racism-measuring-tool-isnt-up-to-the-job.htmlGoogle Scholar
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolle, D., Soroka, S., & Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 56, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. New York, NY: Doubleday Books.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York, NY: Crown.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013). Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: www.huduser.gov/portal/Publications/pdf/HUD-514_HDS2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vuletich, H. A., & Payne, B. K. (2019). Stability and change in implicit bias. Psychological Science, 30, 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619844270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, T. L., Sheeran, P., & Pepper, J. (2012). Gaining control over responses to implicit attitude tests: Implementation intentions engender fast responses on attitude-incongruent trials. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X532192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, E., Riskind, R. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Implicit preferences for straight people over lesbian women and gay men weakened from 2006 to 2013. Collabra, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D. (2016, October 5). Read a transcript of the vice-presidential debate. Time. Retrieved from: http://time.com/4517096/vice-presidential-debate-kaine-pence-transcript/Google Scholar
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationships with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yogeeswaran, K., & Dasgupta, N. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit stereotypes about nationality on discriminatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1332–1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210380928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerhouni, O., Rougier, M., & Muller, D. (2016). “Who (really) is Charlie?”: French cities with lower implicit prejudice toward Arabs demonstrated larger participation rates in Charlie Hebdo rallies. International Review of Social Psychology, 29, 69–76, https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). Amos (Version 25.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: IBM SPSS.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B. (2020). Personality as a situation: A target-centered perspective on social situations. In J. F. Rauthmann, R. A. Sherman, & Funder, D. C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychological Situations (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M., et al. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, Articles, 76, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01Google Scholar
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., et al. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad-model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dentale, F., Vecchione, M., Ghezzi, V., et al. (2016). Applying the Latent State-Trait analysis to decompose state, trait, and error components of the self-esteem Implicit Association Test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000378Google Scholar
Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., & Fleeson, W. (2009). Introduction to personality and assessment at age 40: Reflections on the legacy of the person-situation debate and the future of person-situation integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S. D., et al. (2019). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., et al. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2017). Beyond persons and situations: An interactionist approach to understanding implicit bias. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., Morrison, M., Phills, C. E., et al. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., Morrison, M., Phills, C. E., et al. (2019). Corrigendum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1528–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219832334Google Scholar
Geiser, C., Litson, K., Bishop, J., et al. (2015). Analyzing person, situation and person × situation interaction effects: Latent state-trait models for the combination of random and fixed situations. Psychological Methods, 20, 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Geschwendner, T., et al. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, T. A., Friedman, N. P., Bartholow, B. D., et al. (2015). Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Klauer, K. C. (2015). Model testing and selection, theory of. In Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 15, pp. 653–658). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., et al. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903076826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Voss, A. (2012). Multinomial models and diffusion models. In Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., & Stahl, C. (Eds.), Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology. Abridged edition (pp. 331–354). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., et al. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., et al. (2007). Understanding and using the implicit association test: What we know (so far) about the method. In Wittenbrink, B. & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Implicit Measures of Attitudes. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 59–102.Google Scholar
Lemmer, G., Gollwitzer, M., Schiller, E.-M., et al. (2015). On the psychometric properties of the aggressiveness-IAT for children and adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, F., Novick, M., & Birnbaum, A. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Oxford: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Machery, E. (2017). Do indirect measures of biases measure traits or situations? Psychological Inquiry, 28, 288–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180(pp. 59–102)1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., et al. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, J. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2017). Persons or situations? Individual differences explain variance in aggregated implicit race attitudes. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samayoa, J. A. G., & Fazio, R. H. (2017). Who starts the wave? Let’s not forget the role of the individual. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-online, 8, 23–74.Google Scholar
Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2005). A Latent State-Trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyer, R., Geiser, C., & Fiege, C. (2012). Latent state-trait models. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D., & Sher, K. J. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 3: Data Analysis and Research Publication. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-014Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkes, H. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?” Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2005). Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 52(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bading, K., Stahl, C., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., et al. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, K. C. (1996). Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 20, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-BCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00233-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2015). Not so fast: Ten challenges to importing implicit attitude measures to media psychology. Media Psychology, 18(3), 338–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1008102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P. M., et al. (2006). Decoding the Implicit Association Test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2006). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, R., & Agerström, J. (2016). A closer look at the discrimination outcomes in the IAT literature. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2010). Automatic stereotype activation is context dependent. Social Psychology, 41(3), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2011). The activation of specific facets of age stereotypes depends on individuating information. Social Cognition, 29(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, B. P. I., & Mitchell, C. J. (2009). Processing fluency as a predictor of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 2030–2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802651737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., et al. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corneille, O., & Hütter, M. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320911325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, X. C., Brendl, C. M., & Ariely, D. (2010). Wanting, liking, and preference construction. Emotion, 10(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dai, X. C., Dong, P., & Jia, J. S. (2014). When does playing hard to get increase romantic attraction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, J. (2003a). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J. (2003b). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social Psychology and Personality Compass, 8(7), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, J., & De Bruycker, E. (2007). The Identification-EAST as a valid measure of implicit attitudes toward alcohol-related stimuli. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 59(4), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, J., Heider, N., Spruyt, A., et al. (2015). The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure of beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(319), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Paula Couto, M. C. P., Huang, T., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Age specificity in explicit and implicit endorsement of prescriptive age stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 820739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.820739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Paula Couto, M. C. P., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Prescriptive views of aging: Disengagement, activation, wisdom, and dignity as normative expectations for older people. In Palgi, Y., Shrira, A., & Diehl, M. (Eds.), Subjective Views of Aging. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, pp. 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentale, F., Vecchione, M., Ghezzi, V., et al. (2020). Beyond an associative conception of automatic self-evaluations: Applying the Relational Responding Task to measure self-esteem. The Psychological Record, 70(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00392-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L. H., Truesdale, R., Wojcik, A., et al. (2003). Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food. Physiology and Behavior, 78(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00978-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdfelder, E., Auer, T. S., Hilbig, B. E., et al. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(3), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., et al. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 97–116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I,” the “A,” and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.513497CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Förderer, S., & Unkelbach, C. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS-US relations. Cognition & Emotion, 26(3), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.588687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (2010). When old and frail is not the same. Dissociating category-based and stimulus-based influences on compatibility effects in four implicit measurement methods. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903049963CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Cesario, J. (2013). Of mice and men: What animal research can tell us about context effects on automatic responses in humans. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Hahn, A. (2019). Implicit measures: Procedures, use, and interpretation. In Blanton, H., LaCroix, J. M., & Webster, G. D. (Eds.), Measurement in Social Psychology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 29–55.Google Scholar
Govan, C. L., & Williams, K. D. (2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., et al. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigutsch, L. A., Lewe, G., Rothermund, K., et al. (2019). Implicit ‘wanting’ without implicit ‘liking’: A test of incentive-sensitization theory in the context of smoking addiction using the Wanting-Implicit-Association-Test (W-IAT). Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 64, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.01.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heck, D. W., & Erdfelder, E. (2016). Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1440–1465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1025-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, M., Remington, B., & Glautier, S. (2005). Dissociation of wanting and liking for alcohol in humans: A test of the incentive-sensitisation theory. Psychopharmacology, 178(4), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2026-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houben, K., Rothermund, K., & Wiers, R. W. (2009). Predicting alcohol use with a recoding-free variant of the Implicit Association Test. Addictive Behaviors, 34(5), 487–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.12.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Automatic activation of age stereotypes: Is attention to category information sufficient for stereotype priming? Social Psychology, 53(5), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T., & Rothermund, K. (2023a). Endorsement and embodiment of cautiousness-related age stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1091763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1091763CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, T., & Rothermund, K. (2023b). Implicit and explicit age stereotypes assessed in the same contexts are still independent. Experimental Aging Research, 49(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2022.2039507CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & De Houwer, J. (2011). The dominance of associative theorizing in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 465–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, S., Hussey, I., Corrigan, B., et al. (2016). Faking revisited: Exerting strategic control over performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(5), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T. A., Friedman, N. P., Bartholow, B. D., et al. (2015). Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Z. (2016). Disentangling recoding processes and evaluative associations in a gender attitude implicit association test among adult males. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2276–2284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1126290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusepeitis, A., & Rothermund, K. (2022). No elephant in the room: The incremental validity of implicit self-esteem measures. Journal of Personality, 90(6), 916–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusepeitis, A., & Rothermund, K. (2023). Is there something you don’t tell me? Evidence for the incremental predictive validity of indirectly assessed self-esteem using the Propositional Evaluation Paradigm. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/266945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, S., & Peek-O’Leary, M. (2005). Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test (IAT) reflect familiarity or affect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinoshita, S., & Peek-O’Leary, M. (2006). Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(12), 2102–2120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500451141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. C. (2010). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-trait approach. Psychometrika, 75(1), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauer, K. C., & Kellen, D. (2018). RT-MPTs: Process models for response-time distributions based on multinomial processing trees with applications to recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 82, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauer, K. C., & Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the Implicit Association Test effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., et al. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903076826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Voss, A. (2012). Multinomial models and diffusion models. In Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., & Stahl, C. (Eds.), Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology. Abridged edition (pp. 331–354). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., et al. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koranyi, N., Brückner, E., Jäckel, A., et al. (2020). Dissociation between wanting and liking for coffee in heavy drinkers. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 34(12), 1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881120922960CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koranyi, N., Grigutsch, L. A., Algermissen, J., et al. (2017). Dissociating implicit wanting from implicit liking: Development and validation of the Wanting-Implicit-Association-Test (W-IAT). Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koranyi, N., & Meissner, F. (2015). Handing over the reins: Neutralizing negative attitudes toward dependence in response to reciprocal romantic liking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615580169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornadt, A. E., Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2016). Implicit and explicit age stereotypes for specific life domains across the life span: Distinct patterns and age group differences. Experimental Aging Research, 42(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2016.1132899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornadt, A. E., & Rothermund, K. (2011). Contexts of aging: Assessing evaluative age stereotypes in different life domains. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 66(5), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornadt, A. E., & Rothermund, K. (2015). Views on aging: Domain-specific approaches and implications for developmental regulation. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 35(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1891/0198-8794.35.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, A. A., & Scholderer, J. (2015). Indirect measurement of motivation: Developing and testing a motivational recoding-free Implicit Association Test (m-IAT-RF). Social Psychology, 46(3), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A. E., Axt, J. R., et al. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74(5), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litt, A., Khan, U., & Shiv, B. (2010). Lusting while loathing: Parallel counterdriving of wanting and liking. Psychological Science, 21(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609355633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V, Batchelder, W. H., et al. (2015). Bayesian estimation of multinomial processing tree models with heterogeneity in participants and items. Psychometrika, 80(1), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9374-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarland, S. G., & Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20(6), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.6.483.22977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, F., Grigutsch, L. A., Koranyi, N., et al. (2019). Predicting behavior with implicit measures: Disillusioning findings, reasonable explanations, and sophisticated solutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030734CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2015a). The insect-nonword IAT revisited: Dissociating between evaluative associations and recoding. Social Psychology, 46(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2015b). A needle in a haystack: Isolating implicit self-esteem in the self-esteem IAT. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2015c). A thousand words are worth more than a picture? The effects of stimulus modality on the Implicit Association Test. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(7), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615580381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, C. J. (2004). Mere acceptance produces apparent attitude in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. P., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, T., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2013). The effect of object-valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27(4), 743–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, F., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Talking loudly but lazing at work – Behavioral effects of stereotypes are context dependent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F., & Rothermund, K. (2019). The Propositional Evaluation Paradigm: Indirect assessment of personal beliefs and attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In Bargh, J. A. (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Psychology: Social Psychology and the Unconscious. The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes (pp. 265–292). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032734CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. D. (2003). Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: Assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(10), 1149–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00018-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasek, J., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010). Optimizing survey questionnaire design in political science: Insights from psychology. In Leighley, J. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235476.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., et al. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2010). Prediction of behavior. In Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications (pp. 255–277). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Peters, K. R., & Gawronski, B. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remue, J., De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., et al. (2013). Self-esteem revisited: Performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self-versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition & Emotion, 27(8), 1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.786681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remue, J., Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., et al. (2014). To be or want to be: Disentangling the role of actual versus ideal self in implicit self-esteem. PloS One, 9(9), e108837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108837CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving – An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18(3), 247–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-PCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothermund, K., Grigutsch, L. A., Jusepeitis, A., et al. (2020). Research with implicit measures: Suggestions for a new agenda of sub-personal psychology. Social Cognition, 38, S243–S263. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothermund, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Gast, A., et al. (2009). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The recoding-free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701822975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the Implicit Association Test: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffens, M. C., & Plewe, I. (2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teige-Mocigemba, S. & Klauer, K. C. (2015). Implicit Association Test. In Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., vol. 11, pp. 703–708). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., & Rothermund, K. (2008). Minimizing method-specific variance in the IAT: A single block IAT. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., & Sherman, J. W. (2010). Practical guide to Implicit Association Tests and related tasks. In Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications (pp. 117–139). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Dirix, N., et al. (2017). Beyond associations: Do implicit beliefs play a role in smoking addiction? Journal of Psychopharmacology, 31(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116665327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Spruyt, A., et al. (2011). Testing the validity of implicit measures of wanting and liking. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Spruyt, A., et al. (2015a). Heavy social drinkers score higher on implicit wanting and liking for alcohol than alcohol-dependent patients and light social drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., & Van Bockstaele, B. (2015b). Implicit measures of “wanting” and “liking” in humans. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., & Smith, C. T. (2018). Relational information moderates approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 184, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Stülpnagel, R., & Steffens, M. C. (2010). Prejudiced or just smart? Intelligence as a confounding factor in the IAT effect. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 218(1), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentura, D., & Degner, J. (2010). A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks. In Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications (pp. 95–116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (2007). Paradigms we live by: A plea for more basic research on the Implicit Association Test. In Wittenbrink, B., & Schwarz, N. S. (Eds.), Implicit Measures of Attitudes: Procedures and Controversies (pp. 195–215). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 41–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00619.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiers, R. W., Van Woerden, N., Smulders, F. T. Y., et al. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.111.4.648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigboldus, D. H. J., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype-inconsistent trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiswede, D., Koranyi, N., Müller, F., et al. (2013). Validating the truth of propositions: Behavioral and ERP indicators of truth evaluation processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(6), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., et al. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.907324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Ajzen, I. T. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 20, pp. 1–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. T., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcuri, L., & Boca, S. (1996). Pregiudizio eaffi liazione politica: Destra e sinistra di fronte all’immigrazione dal terzo mondo [Prejudice and political affiliation: Right- and left-wing attitudes toward immigration from the third world]. In Legrenzi, P., & Girotto, V. (Eds.), Psicologia e politica [Psychology and politics]. Milano: Cortina, pp. 214–274.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 380–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banse, R. & Gawronski, B. (2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validität. Diagnostica, 49(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 668–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56, 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, A., Buchholz, N., Zinkernagel, A., et al. (2019). Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience (online). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. VI, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross‑situational consistency in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsch, C. (2004). Präferenz für Intuition und Deliberation (PID): Inventar zur Erfassung von affekt- und kognitionsbasiertem Entscheiden [Preference for intuition and deliberation (PID): An inventory for assessing affect- and cognition-based decision-making]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2001). A domain-specific risk taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, M., Fujiwara, E., Borsutzky, S., et al. (2005). Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castelli, L., De Dea, C., & Nesdale, D. (2008). Learning social attitudes: Children’s sensitivity to the nonverbal behavior of adult models during interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1504–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and Motivation Structure and Measurement. New York, NY: World Book.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Warburton, F. W. (1967). Objective Personality and Motivation Tests: A Theoretical Introduction and Practical Compendium. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., et al. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cuyper, K., De Houwer, J., Vansteelandt, K., et al. (2017). Using indirect measurement tasks to assess the self-concept of personality: A systematic review and meta-analyses. European Journal of Personality, 31, 8–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13, Article e28046. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046.Google Scholar
Dislich, F. X. R., Imhoff, R., Banse, R., et al. (2012). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-concepts of intelligence predict performance on tests of intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 26, 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dislich, F. X. R., Zinkernagel, A., Ortner, T.M., et al. (2010). Convergence of direct, indirect, and objective risk-taking measures in gambling: The moderating role of impulsiveness and self-control. Journal of Psychology, 218, 20–27.Google Scholar
Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441–1455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology. New York, NY: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99, 550–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., et al. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenigstein, A. (2009). Private and public self-consciousness. In Leary, M. R., & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipp, S. H., & Freudenberg, E. (1989). Der Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositioneller Selbstaufmerksamkeit (SAM-Fragebogen) [A Scale for assessing dispositional self-consciousness (SAM-Scale)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology, 23, 567–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2009). When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, W., & Ekman, P. (1983). EMFACS-7: Emotional Facial Action Coding System. University of California (unpublished manual).Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual-process theories. In D. E. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 282–312.Google Scholar
Gerstenberg, F. X. R., Imhoff, R., Banse, R., et al. (2013). How implicit-explicit consistency of the intelligence self-concept moderates reactions to performance feedback. European Journal of Personality, 27, 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstenberg, F. X. R., Imhoff, R., & Schmitt, M. (2012). “Women are bad at math, but I’m not, am I?” Fragile mathematical self-concept predicts vulnerability to a stereotype threat effect on mathematical performance. European Journal of Personality, 26, 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist, 72, 861–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., et al. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2006a). Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. [Moderators of the consistency of implicitly and explicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits]. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2006b). Ein Modell des Zusammenhangs impliziter Reaktionszeitverfahren mit Fragebogenmaßen [A model of convergence between implict reaction time procedures and questionnaires]. In Proyer, R. T., Ortner, T. M., & Kubinger, K. D. (Eds.), Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests [Theory and application of objective personality tests]. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2006c). Synergistic moderator effects of situation and person factors of awareness and adjustment on the consistency of implicit and explicit attitudes. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008a). Differential stability: The effects of acute and chronic construct accessibility on the temporal stability of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008b). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 24, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Facing one’s implicit biases: From awareness to acknowledgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 769–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., et al. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hänze, M. (2002). Bedürfnis nach Struktur und Furcht vor Festlegung: Psychometrische Analysen einer deutschsprachigen Skala zur Erfassung der Konstrukte “Personal Need for Structure,” “Personal Fear of Invalidity,” und “Need for Closure.” Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (Eds.). (1928). Studies in the Nature of Character (Vol. I: Studies in Deceit). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hefter, R., Manoach, D., & Barton, J. (2005). Perception of facial expression and facial identity in subjects with social developmental disorders. Neurology, 65, 1620–1625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, et al. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Castelli, L., et al. (2008a). Implicit and explicit attitudes and interracial interaction: The moderating role of situationally available control resources. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B. A., et al. (2005). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., & Schmitt, M. (2005). On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 19, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., & Schmitt, M. (2009). The road to the unconscious self not taken: Discrepancies between self- and observer-inferences about implicit dispositions from nonverbal behavioral cues. European Journal of Personality, 23, 243–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Wiers, R., et al. (2008b). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J. G., Wilke, A., & Weber, E. U. (2004). A domain specific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitude in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 153–163.Google Scholar
Kammer, D., & Nowack, W. (1983). Self-Monitoring: Construction and Validation of a German Two Factor Scale (Bielefelder Arbeiten zur Sozialpsychologie, Nr. 104). Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld, Germany.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., et al. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology (online), 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826Google ScholarPubMed
Korb, S., & Sander, D. (2009). Facial expression (neural architecture of). In Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–175.Google Scholar
Krizan, Z., & Suls, J. (2008). Are implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem related? A meta-analysis for the name-letter test. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A. E., Axt, J. R., et al. (2019). Relationship between the implicit association test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., et al. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 75–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Hirayama, S., et al. (2005). Development and validation of a measure of display rule knowledge: The display rule assessment inventory. Emotion, 5, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merz, J. (1986). SAF: Fragebogen zur Messung von dispositioneller Selbstaufmerksamkeit [SAF: Scale for the assessment of dispositional self-consciousness]. Diagnostica, 32, 142–152.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (Ed.). (1968). Personality and Assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009) The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32,183–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomb, T. M. (1929). Consistency of Certain Extrovert-Introvert Behavior Patterns in 51 Problem Boys. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., & Ric, F. (2017). Psychology of Emotion. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B.A. (2005). Moderators of the relationships between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B.A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, T. M., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Objective personality tests. In Ortner, T. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.). Behavior Based Assessment: Going beyond Self Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains. Oxford: Hogrefe Publishing, pp. 133–149.Google Scholar
Ortner, T. M., & Schmitt, M. (2014). Advances and continuing challenges in objective personality testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude Strength. Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pietschnig, J., Gittler, G., Stieger, S., et al. (2018). Indirect (implicit) and direct (explicit) self-esteem measures are virtually unrelated: A meta-analysis of the initial preference task. PLoS ONE 13 (9), e0202873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, R. R., Below, M. C., & Goldman, M. S. (2010). Explicit and implicit measures of expectancy and related alcohol cognitions: A meta-analytic comparison. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinn, W. E. (1984). The neuropsychology of facial expression: A review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 52–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, E. D., Gupta, S. S., Adnan, A. M., et al. (2016). Neurophysiology of spontaneous facial expressions: I Motor control of the upper and lower face is behaviorally independent in adults. Cortex, 76, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, E. D., Gupta, S. S., Adnan, A. M., et al. (2019). Neurophysiology of spontaneous facial expressions: II Motor control of the right and left face is partially independent in adults. Cortex, 111, 164–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, E. D., & Pulusu, V. K. (2013). Posed versus spontaneous facial expressions are modulated by opposite cerebral hemispheres. Cortex, 49, 1280–1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, A. F. (2009). Fragebogen zu selbststeuernden Kompetenzen (FSSTK) [Questionnaire of self-regulative competencies]. Bonn: University of Bonn (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (1990). Konsistenz als Persönlichkeitseigenschaft? Moderatorvariablen in der Persönlichkeits- und Einstellungsforschung [Consistency as a personality trait? Moderators in personality and attitude research]. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (2006). Conceptual, theoretical, and historical foundations of multimethod assessment. In Eid, M., & Diener, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology. New York, NY: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (2009). Person x situation - interactions as moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M., & Borkenau, P. (1992). The consistency of personality. In Caprara, G.-V., & Van Heck, G.L. (Eds.), Modern Personality Psychology. Critical Reviews and New Directions. New York, NY: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Schröder-Abé, M., Rudolph, A., & Schütz, A. (2007a). High implicit self-esteem is not necessarily advantageous: Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem and their relationship with anger expression and psychological health. European Journal of Personality, 21, 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder-Abé, M., Rudolph, A., Wiesner, A., et al. (2007b). Self-esteem discrepancies and defensive reactions to social feedback. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. W., Klauer, C. K., & Allen, T. J. (2010). Mathematical modeling of implicit social cognition. In Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 156–175.Google Scholar
Smith, E. C., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In Lindzey, G., & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd ed., vol. II, pp. 883–947). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwuünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability scale (SES-17): Scale development and initial findings on reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swann, W. B., & Seyle, C. (2005). Personality Psychology’s comeback and its emerging symbiosis with social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tassinary, L. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Vanman, E. J. (2007). The skeletomotor system: Surface electromyography. In Cacioppo, J., Tassinary, L., & Berntson, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 267–299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship between questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinkernagel, A., Hofmann, W., Dislich, F. X. R., et al. (2011). Indirect assessment of implicit disgust sensitivity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinkernagel, A., Hofmann, W., Gerstenberg, F. X. R., et al. (2013). The road to the unconscious self taken: Understanding when people gain self-knowledge of implicit dispositions from behavioral cues. European Journal of Personality, 27, 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinkernagel, A., Alexandrowicz, R. W., Lischetzke, T., et al. (2019). The BlenderFace Method: Video-based measurement of raw movement data during facial expressions of emotion using open-source software. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 747–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2019). Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 307–331.Google Scholar
Barden, J., Maddux, W. W., Petty, R. E., et al. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biernat, M., & Vescio, T. K. (1993). Categorization and stereotyping: Effects of group context on memory and social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 166–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2004). The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15, 674–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., Sadler, M. S., et al. (2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Stereotype Activation and Inhibition: Advances in Social Cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 243–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Garst, J. (1998). Stereotypes in thought and deed: Social-cognitive origins of intergroup discrimination. In Sedikides, C., Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (Eds.), Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 311–335.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Peery, D. (2009). Social categorization and stereotyping in vivo: The VUCA challenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman, J. S. & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), Unintended Thought. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 212–252.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooley, E., & Payne, B. K. (2017). Using groups to measure intergroup prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 46–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., et al. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., et al. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Kurzban, R. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, W. T. L., & Devine, P. G. (2015). Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: A theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content. PLoS ONE, 10, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, M. A., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2018). Category (non)fit modulates extrapolative stereotyping of multiply categorizable targets. Social Cognition, 36, 559–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. In Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.), Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York, NY: New Press, pp. 357–383.Google Scholar
Deaux, K. (2018). Ethnic/racial identity: Fuzzy categories and shifting positions. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehon, H., & Brédart, S. (2001). An ‘other-race’ effect in age estimation from faces. Perception, 30, 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devaraj, S., Quigley, N. R., & Patel, P. C. (2018). The effects of skin tone, height, and gender on earnings. PLoS ONE, 13, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., et al. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., et al. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., et al. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., et al. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, A. J., Eder, A. B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Approach–avoidance motivation and emotion: Convergence and divergence. Emotion Review, 5, 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Chen, J. M., McDonel, E. C., et al. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude—behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 155–171.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. B., Penner, A. M., Saperstein, A., et al. (2011). Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception. PLoS ONE, 6, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative–propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, DB. A. L., et al. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 526–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goff, P. A., Thomas, M. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59, 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. C. (1991). Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: People = male, male = people. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M. S., & Thomas, K. M. (2009). The hidden prejudice in selection: A research investigation on skin color bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 134–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinzman, L., & Maddox, K. B. (2017). Conceptual and visual representations of racial categories: Distinguishing subtypes from subgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14, 640–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, K. B., & Davies, P. G. (2010). Differentially dangerous? Phenotypic racial stereotpicality increases implicit bias among ingroup and outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, K. B., & Davies, P. G. (2017). What influences shooter bias? The effects of suspect race, neighborhood, and clothing on decisions to shoot. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, S. K., & Chasteen, A. L. (2009). Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 1281–1285.Google Scholar
Kang, S. K., Chasteen, A. L., Cadieux, J., et al. (2014). Comparing young and older adults’ perceptions of conflicting stereotypes and multiply-categorizable targets. Psychology and Aging, 29, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., et al. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A. M. (2018). Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults, and the elderly. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., et al. (2002). The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A., Axt, J., et al. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, G. J. W., Neel, R., Lassetter, B., et al. (2018). Racial bias in implicit danger associations generalizes to older male targets. PLoS ONE, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, D. S., & Correll, J. (2011). Target prototypicality moderates racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2018). The effects of category and physical features on stereotyping and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, K. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddox, K. B., & Perry, J. M. (2018). Racial appearance bias: Improving evidence-based policies to address racial disparities. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. E., North, M. S., & Phillips, K. W. (2019). Intersectional escape: Older women elude agentic prescriptions more than older men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 342–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, M. M., Sidanius, J., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Developing a theory of gendered prejudice: An evolutionary and social dominance perspective. In Kramer, R. M., Leonardelli, G. J., & Livingston, R. W. (Eds.), Social Cognition, Social Identity, and Intergroup Relations. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 189–220.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1981). The spontaneous self-concept as affected by personal distinctiveness. In Lynch, M., Norem-Hebeison, A. A., & Gergen, K. (Eds.), Self-Concept: Advances in Theory and Research. New York, NY: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. J., & Miller, D. T. (1995). The distinctiveness effect in social categorization: You are what makes you unusual. Psychological Science, 6, 246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas, G., de la Fuente, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: A review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 621–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In Bargh, J. A. (Ed.), Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 265–292.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell (Eds.), M. S., Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117–141.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, K. E. (1982). Measures of explained variance: Cautions and limitations. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 766–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 562–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, K., & Lundberg, K. (2014). The affect misattribution procedure: Ten years of evidence on reliability, validity, and mechanisms. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 672–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedulla, D. S. (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, A. M., & Saperstein, A. (2008). How social status shapes race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 19628–19630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perszyk, D. R., Lei, R. F., Bodenhausen, G. V., et al. (2019). Bias at the intersection of race and gender: Evidence from preschool-aged children. Developmental Science, 22, e12788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2010). Prediction of behavior. In Gawronski, B. & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 255–278.Google Scholar
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2019a). Race-crime congruency effects revisited: Do we take defendants’ sexual orientation into account? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2019b). Racial stereotyping of gay men: Can a minority sexual orientation erase race? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 14, e12518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., et al. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high-and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., Goplen, J., & Kunstman, J. W. (2011). Selective responses to threat: The roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1274–1281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, J. R., & Olson, K. R. (2018). Test–retest reliability and predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in children. Developmental Psychology, 54, 308–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rattan, A., Steele, J., & Ambady, N. (2019). Identical applicant but different outcomes: The impact of gender versus race salience in hiring. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remedios, J. D., Chasteen, A. L., Rule, N. O., et al. (2011). Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1312–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Prestwich, A., et al. (2007). The IAT as a predictor of food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, A. M., Sherman, J. W., Rees, H. R., et al. (2020). On the roles of stereotype activation and application in diminishing implicit bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 46, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.) (2014). Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. T., Navarro, M. A., Tan, C. N., et al. (2014). Attitude–behavior consistency, the principle of compatibility, and organ donation: A classic innovation. Health Psychology, 33, 1084–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepanova, E. V., Strube, M. J., Clote, L. E., et al. (2016). Pictorial race activation in priming measures. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. R., & Simpson, A. J. (2017). Perspective taking and member‐to‐group generalization of implicit racial attitudes: The role of target prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. R., Thiem, K. C., & Neel, R. (2016). Does seeing faces of young Black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli? Psychological Science, 27, 384–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenstra, G. (2013). The gendered nature of discriminatory experiences by race, class, and sexuality: A comparison of intersectionality theory and the subordinate male target hypothesis. Sex Roles, 68, 646–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, R. H., & Newman, L. S. (1976). Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, R. H., Vernon, D. T., & Tognacci, L. N. (1974). Specificity of the attitude as a determinant of attitude-behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 724–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. P., Remedios, J. D., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Interactive effects of obvious and ambiguous social categories on perceptions of leadership: When double-minority status may be beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolsiefer, K., Westfall, J., & Judd, C. M. (2017). Modeling stimulus variation in three common implicit attitude tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1193–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×